Summary and evidence grading of over‐the‐counter scar treatments

Wound care practices following in-office cutaneous surgery among family physicians in Canada

OBJECTIVE

Family physicians (FPs) in Canada routinely perform in-office cutaneous surgery. There is strong evidence to support a moist wound healing environment, resulting in faster healing times and improved cosmesis. However, the wound care practices of FPs have not been previously studied. We aimed to examine the postoperative wound care practices of FPs after in-office cutaneous surgery.

METHOD

An online survey was distributed to Canadian FPs to determine post-surgical wound care practices. The survey examined moist versus dry wound healing and the reasons for these recommendations were explored. Additional wound care practices were also studied. Appropriate statistical analyses were undertaken.

RESULTS

A total of 573 (91.5%) FPs completed the survey. Just under half (49.2%) of FPs recommended moist wound healing to their patients, while the remaining respondents (50.8%) recommended dry wound healing. The most endorsed reason for both moist and dry wound care recommendations was prior training (63.1% and 65.3%, respectively). Most physicians (57.2%) recommended the use of a cream or ointment postoperatively. While there appeared to be consensus on recommending sun avoidance after cutaneous surgery (77.7%), additional wound care practices varied, including: the use of dressings; cleansing practices; smoking cessation; reduction in physical activity; photoprotection; water exposure; and scar treatment/cosmetic use.

CONCLUSION

Almost half of FPs in Canada responding to the survey did not recommend moist wound healing despite strong evidence to support this practice. We also noted a diverse range of postoperative wound care practices after in-office cutaneous surgery. Therefore, these results highlight a critical need for consistent wound care recommendations following cutaneous surgery for FPs in Canada.

Reducing Risks of Facial Scarring

Risk factors for the formation of facial scars include skin type, ethnicity, scar location, and certain medical conditions that contribute to poor or delayed healing. Risk of scar can be reduced with appropriate surgical planning, including proper placement and design of incisions, meticulous skin closure, aseptic technique, and wound care to improve healing. Common pathologic scars include hypertrophic scars and keloid scars, each of which has unique approaches to surgical revision and medical treatment due to their respective risks of recurrence. Topical scar therapies, medical therapies, and surgical revision techniques for improvement in final scar appearance are discussed.

Analysis of images supplied by Skincam® can record the changes of some scar features that occur over time. Comparisons with the assessments of dermatologist and patients' perception

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to assess in vivo the validity of a new imaging device in quantifying the scarring process over time and to compare its data with the expertise of dermatologist and patients' self-appraisals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 37 Korean women, aged 20-50 year, with closed scars of different types, were enrolled after a dermatological evaluation. All subjects applied daily a hydrating cream on their scars for 2 months. Images of scars at different times (Day 0, Day 28, and Day 56) were taken and further analyzed, yielding various parameters such as color, luminance, size, volume, and depth of each scar. A dermatologist visually graded, at each time point, the clinical aspect of the scar, and patients were asked to answer to some questions dealing with their self-examination of their scar.

RESULTS

The changes in some scar features that occurred during the application period were quantified and statistically differed from the D₀ baseline value. Scars became of reduced size, lighter (Increased luminance), less red, less deep, and less voluminous. Some of these parameters (volume, lightness, smoothness, texture regularity) were statistically different at D₂₈ whereas some others (area, depth, redness) showed significant changes at D₅₆ . Dermatologist expertise and patients' assessments were in high agreement.

CONCLUSION

This methodological approach that uses a dedicated camera associated with image analysis, despite some inherent limits (size of the scar), appears as a valuable aid to surgeons in the management of scars, in the follow-up of a given procedure or treatment. Beyond scar management, this approach may be extended to other skin disorders such as acne.

Unilateral Tessier 7 cleft: Case report of Z-plasty with geometric broken line repair and literature review

Tessier 7 clefts are a rare congenital anomaly, usually surgically repaired with Z-plasty or other reconstructive methods, although undesirable scars may result. We present a review of the literature and a case of unilateral Tessier 7 cleft repaired with a novel reconstruction technique using a combined Z-plasty and geometric broken line closure (GBLC) to camouflage and irregularize the otherwise linear scar. We present this case to expand the armamentarium of surgical options to address Tessier 7 clefts and to review techniques for repair.