Technological advances in diagnostic testing for von Willebrand disease: new approaches and challenges

Comparison of von Willebrand factor platelet-binding activity assays: ELISA overreads type 2B with loss of HMW multimers

BACKGROUND

A number of new assays with different measuring principles are available to measure von Willebrand factor (VWF) glycoprotein Ib (GPIb)-binding activity, but little is known about how these assays might behave differently for subtypes of von Willebrand disease (VWD).

OBJECTIVES

The Comparison of Assays to Measure VWF Activity (COMPASS-VWF) study was designed to compare all available VWF GPIb-binding activity assays for VWF. We specifically searched for particular assay behavior differences.

PATIENTS/METHODS

To sort out random differences from systematic assay behavior deviations, all assays were performed in different laboratories on the same samples in a blinded fashion. Samples from 53 normal controls and 42 well-characterized VWD patients were reanalyzed in this study to dissect assay-specific discrepancies.

RESULTS

No assay behavior differences were found for 53 normal controls. For VWD patients, we found the following systematic assay behavior patterns: (a) All ELISA assays for VWF:GPIbR as well as VWF:GPIbM are insensitive to detect the low VWF activity of VWD type 2B patients with loss of high molecular weight multimers; (b) VWF:Ab assay reports higher activity for the p.V1665E mutation than all other assays; and (c) all ristocetin-based assays (including VWF:RCo using fixed platelets) but the AcuStar assay report discrepantly low VWF activity for the p.P1467S polymorphism. No systematic assay-specific difference was observed for either the particle agglutination VWF:GPIbM assay or the AcuStar assay using magnetic beads.

CONCLUSIONS

Different assay principles may lead to discrepant results for certain VWD types or mutations. Therefore, a more extensive study for a large number of patients is needed to better characterize the incidence and relevance of such assay-specific differences.

von Willebrand disease: Diagnosis and treatment, treatment of women, and genomic approach to diagnosis

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. VWD is caused by deficiencies in von Willebrand factor (VWF), a critical adhesive haemostatic protein. This review provides an overview of VWD diagnosis and treatment, special considerations in treating women with VWD, and current genomic approaches to VWD. For diagnosis and treatment in VWD, an accurate diagnosis is critical to providing effective treatments, determining appropriate laboratory monitoring and for counselling the patient and family. Diagnosis of VWD begins with the clinical assessment for the bleeding phenotype, which is usually characterized by mucocutaneous and provoked bleeding. The diagnosis of VWD is then made by laboratory investigation. Multiple assays are used to assess VWF levels and functions. The mainstays of VWD treatment are tailored by VWD type and symptoms, and can include antifibrinolytic treatment, desmopressin and VWF replacement treatment. Women with VWD are also at risk for excessive uterine bleeding, such as with menses and childbirth. In addition to standard VWD treatments, heavy menstrual bleeding can be treated with hormones. Interdisciplinary management of childbirth and prophylaxis in the postpartum period are needed to reduce the risk of postpartum haemorrhage. Genomic approaches to VWD can inform VWD diagnosis, treatment, test assay selection, reproductive planning and family counselling. Most VWD patients have an identifiable VWF gene DNA variant. Next-generation sequencing is rapidly being adopted to provide more comprehensive VWF sequence information for patients with known or suspected VWD.

How I investigate for bleeding disorders

INTRODUCTION

Laboratory investigations for bleeding disorders are warranted when an individual has a personal and/or family history of bleeding, and/or laboratory findings that suggest the possibility of an inherited or acquired bleeding disorder.

METHODS

This review summarizes author's experience with ordering and reporting on diagnostic investigations for common and rare bleeding disorders, with consideration of recent articles on diagnosing bleeding disorders. An updated strategy is presented for investigating common and rare, congenital and acquired bleeding disorders.

RESULTS

An investigation of a suspected bleeding disorder requires a practical strategy that considers the clinical problem to be investigated, the pretest probability of true-positive and false-positive findings, the investigations can be performed locally or in a reference laboratory and limit the number of blood samples required to establish a diagnosis. It is often advantageous to simultaneously test for von Willebrand disease and platelet function disorders, and for coagulation defects, including fibrinogen disorders. An investigation for rarer bleeding disorders, including those affecting factor XIII, α₂ antiplasmin, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, is appropriate when faced with a severe congenital or acquired bleeding problem that cannot be explained by the initial diagnostic investigations.

CONCLUSION

An organized strategy for investigating bleeding disorders that consider important issues, confirms abnormal findings, encourages proper interpretation of the results, and provides a helpful framework for assessing both common and rare causes of bleeding.

An international collaborative study to compare different von Willebrand factor glycoprotein Ib binding activity assays: the COMPASS-VWF study

Essentials New VWF activity assays are increasingly used but information on their comparability is limited. This is an ISTH SSC-organized study (expert labs, 5 countries) to compare all available assays. VWF activity by six assays correlated well with each other. The new assays show improved characteristics - minor differences are noted. SUMMARY: Background Several new assays have become available to measure von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity. The new assays appear to have improved performance characteristics compared with the old reference standard, ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), but information is limited about how they compare with VWF:RCo and each other. Methods The von Willebrand factor Subcommittee of the International Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Scientific and Standardization Committee (SSC) designed a collaborative study involving expert laboratories from several countries to compare available tests with each other and with VWF:RCo. Eight laboratories from five countries were provided with blinded samples from normal healthy individuals and well-characterized clinical cases. Laboratories measured VWF activity using all tests available to them; data from six laboratories, not affected by thawing during transportation, are included in this study. Results All tests correlated well with VWF:RCo activity (r-values ranged from 0.963 to 0.989). Slightly steeper regression lines for VWF:Ab and VWF:GPIbM were clinically insignificant. The new assays showed improved performance characteristics. Of the commercially available assays, the VWF:GPIbR using the AcuStar system was the most sensitive and could reliably detect VWF activity below 1 IU dL-1 . The lower limit of the measuring interval for the VWF:GPIbM and the VWF:GPIbR assays was in the 3-4 and 3-6 IU dL-1 range, respectively. Inter-laboratory variation was also improved for most new assays. Conclusion All VWF activity assays correlated well with each other and the VWF:RCo assay. The slight differences in characteristics found in the COMPASS-VWF study will assist the VWF community in interpreting and comparing activity results.

Validation of automated latex von Willebrand factor activity assay in a new prospective study including post-treatment patient samples

INTRODUCTION

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most prevalent inherited bleeding disorder. Diagnosis requires measurement of VWF-platelet binding function, for which VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) is the reference method. Recently, an automated latex particle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric von Willebrand factor activity assay (VWF:Ab) has been validated showing superior characteristics. We further validate VWF:Ab in a prospective study including post-treatment patient samples.

METHODS

A total of 1151 samples were collected from patients tested for VWD, including 119 samples from patients treated with desmopressin or VWF replacement product. All samples were tested for VWF:Ab and VWF:RCo, and the methods were compared using linear regression. Imprecision, linearity and lower detection limit were determined for both assays.

RESULTS

VWF:Ab showed improved precision compared to VWF:RCo. Linear regression of VWF:Ab and VWF:RCo across all samples exhibited good agreement (R² = 0.89) with statistical significance (P < 0.001) and bias of -8.7. Concordance was high in classifying samples as normal or abnormal. Analysis of treated samples showed excellent agreement (R² = 0.91) with statistical significance (P < 0.001) and bias of -4.3.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis validates the VWF:Ab assay in a prospective study of a large cohort of patient samples and extends these results to post-treatment patient samples.

Variability in platelet dense granule adenosine triphosphate release findings amongst patients tested multiple times as part of an assessment for a bleeding disorder

INTRODUCTION

Lumi-aggregometry quantification of platelet dense granule adenosine triphosphate (ATP) release is commonly used for diagnosing platelet function disorders. As the test findings show considerable variability for healthy controls, we postulated that patient findings might also be variable and investigated patients who were assessed for dense granule ATP release defects more than once.

METHODS

Analyses were performed on prospectively collected data for first and second tests for subjects tested for dense granule ATP release defects more than once by the Hamilton Regional Laboratory Program (HRLMP) between January 2007 and June 2013 (cohort I). Similar analyses were performed for subjects who were recruited to a platelet disorder study (cohort II) and were assessed for ATP release defects more than once before October 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 150 unique subjects had multiple ATP release tests. Results with individual agonists were variable for many subjects. While normal findings with all tested agonists were often confirmed by the second test (cohort I: 83%; cohort II: 100%), impaired release with multiple agonists was confirmed in only some subjects (cohort I: 34%; cohort II: 54%). Inconsistent findings were common (cohort I: 36%; cohort II: 39%). ISTH bleeding scores showed no relationship to the test findings. The finding of impaired ATP release with 2 or more agonists on both tests was not associated with an increased likelihood of a definite bleeding disorder.

CONCLUSION

The variability in platelet dense granule ATP release findings amongst patients assessed for diagnostic purposes suggests that the test has limited value for diagnosing platelet disorders.

Comparison of von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity levels determined by HemosIL AcuStar assay and HemosIL LIA assay with ristocetin cofactor assay by aggregometry

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) requires quantitative as well as qualitative determination of von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels. For functional assessment of VWF, ristocetin cofactor assay by aggregometry is considered to be the gold standard. However, need for technical expertise, labour intensiveness, difficult standardization and high intra- and inter- assay variabilities are some of the limitations of this methodology. Various assays for determination of VWF adhesive function using different methodologies have been developed in recent years.

AIM

To evaluate the HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescence assay (VWF:RCo[Acu]) and the HemosIL latex immunoassay (VWF:act) as diagnostic tests for VWD and identification of type 2 VWD in comparison with the ristocetin cofactor assay performed by aggregometry (VWF:RCo[Agg]).

METHODS

Results from 96 samples analysed by VWF:RCo[Acu] and 128 samples by VWF:act were compared with VWF:RCo[Agg]. Sixty of these samples (25 normal, 17 type 1 and 18 type 2) were analysed by all three assays.

RESULTS

VWF:RCo[Acu] showed excellent agreement with VWF:RCo[Agg], and readily identified all type 2 VWD samples tested. VWF:act showed reasonable agreement with VWF:RCo[Agg] for most patients, but had a slightly lower sensitivity for detection of type 2 VWD.

CONCLUSION

VWF:RCo[Acu] assay has the potential to replace VWF:RCo[Agg] for the diagnosis of VWD.

Long noncoding RNA SPRY4-IT1 predicts poor patient prognosis and promotes tumorigenesis in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is the second common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are emerging as novel regulators in the cancer paradigm. However, investigation of lncRNAs on GC is still in its infancy. In this study, we focused on lncRNA SPRY4 intronic transcript 1 (SPRY4-IT1) and investigated its expression pattern, clinical significance, biological function, and molecular mechanism in GC. SPRY4-IT1 expression was examined, and its correlation with clinicopathological characteristics and patient prognosis was analyzed. A series of assays were performed to understand the role of SPRY4-IT1 in GC. SPRY4-IT1 expression was elevated in GC tissues and cell lines, and SPRY4-IT1 levels were highly positively correlated with tumor size, invasion depth, distant metastasis, TNM stage, and reduced overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A multivariate analysis showed that SPRY4-IT1 expression is an independent prognostic factor of OS and DFS in patients with GC. Additionally, the results of in vitro assays showed that the suppression of SPRY4-IT1 expression in GC cell line MKN-45 significantly reduced cell proliferation, colony formation, and cell migration/invasion. Moreover, the tumorigenic effects of SPRY4-IT1 were partially mediated by the regulation of certain cyclins and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)-related genes. Our data suggest that SPRY4-IT1 plays a critical role in GC tumorigenesis and may represent a novel prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target in patients with GC.