Hemolysis interference in 10 coagulation assays on an instrument with viscosity‐based, chromogenic, and turbidimetric clot detection

Effect of hemolysis on D-dimer testing measured with the Improgen kit: is all manufacturer information correct?

D-dimer is a fibrin degradation product and its measurement is affected by hemolysis. This study was designed to reveal the value of hemolysis affecting D-dimer in our laboratory. In this study, hemolysate samples obtained by both mechanical and freezing methods were used. D-dimer levels of all plasmas were measured with Improgen Diagnostic kit by immune-turbidimetric method. Numerical change in hemolyzed samples was evaluated by calculating the percentage difference, and clinically significant differences were evaluated by calculating the maximum acceptable bias (MAB). In the hemolysate study prepared by both freeze-thaw and mechanical methods, it was observed that low D-dimer levels did not exceed the total allowable error (TAE) (30%) up to +2 hemolysis (corresponds to hemoglobin = 1.01-2 g/l) and did not exceed the MAB (65%) even at +4 hemolysis (corresponds to hemoglobin = 1.01-2 g/l). High D-dimer levels did not exceed the limit values of both TAE (30%) and MAB (68%) even in +4 hemolysis. The D-dimer test was affected by lower levels of hemolysis compared to both other studies and the values in the kit insert (hemoglobin >5 g/l corresponds to +4 hemolysis index). We verified the hemolysis interference in the D-dimer test, which we thought was not compatible with the kit insert, under our own laboratory conditions. This is the first hemolysis interference study performed with the Improgen brand d-dimer kit. In samples with a hemolysis rate of +2 and above, it would be more accurate to reject the D-dimer result as a 'hemolyzed sample'.

Clinical guidance for unfractionated heparin dosing and monitoring in critically ill patients

INTRODUCTION

Unfractionated heparin is a widely used anticoagulant in critically ill patients. It has a well-established safety profile and remains an attractive option for clinicians due to its short half-life and reversibility. Heparin has a unique pharmacokinetic profile, which contributes to significant inter-patient and intra-patient variability in effect. The variability in anticoagulant effect combined with heparin's short half-life mean close monitoring is required for clinical efficacy and preventing adverse effects. To optimize heparin use in critically ill patients, effective monitoring assays and dose adjustment strategies are needed.

AREAS COVERED

This paper explores the use of heparin as an anticoagulant and optimal approaches to monitoring in critically ill patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Conventional monitoring assays for heparin dosing have significant limitations. Emerging data appear to favor using anti-Xa assay monitoring for heparin anticoagulation, which many centers have successfully adopted as the standard. The anti-Xa assay appears have important benefits relative to the aPTT for heparin monitoring in critically ill patients, and should be considered for broader use.

Does in vitro hemolysis affect measurements of plasma apixaban concentration by UPLC-MS and anti-Xa assay?

INTRODUCTION

Hemolytic interference may impact various laboratory tests, including coagulation analyses. Apixaban is the most commonly used direct oral anticoagulant in Norway, and there is lacking knowledge on how apixaban concentration measurements might be influenced by hemolysis. Moreover, hemolysis-induced alterations in apixaban levels could potentially impact the risk of bleeding in specific clinical scenarios. We wanted to study whether hemolysis would increase apixaban concentration and investigate the impact of hemolytic interference on apixaban concentration measurements.

METHODS

Blood samples from 20 apixaban-treated patients and 8 healthy controls were hemolyzed in vitro by a freeze method. The degree of hemolysis was measured with plasma free hemoglobin (PfHb) at baseline and two levels of hemolysis. Apixaban concentration was measured in plasma using both the chromogenic anti-Xa method and the ultraperformance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS). Thrombin generation assay was performed to assess coagulability.

RESULTS

UPLC-MS measurements showed a mean concentration change of -1.66% (±3.2%, p = 0.005) and anti-Xa assay showed a mean concentration change of 3.37% (±6.5%, p = 0.09) with increasing hemolysis. Thrombin generation lagtime decreased, and endogenous thrombin potential and peak thrombin increased with increasing hemolysis in both the control group and the apixaban group.

CONCLUSION

Apixaban concentration measurements by anti-Xa assay and UPLC-MS were not affected by hemolysis to a clinically relevant extent. Furthermore, hemolysis did not lead to hypocoagulability when assessed by thrombin generation.

Laboratory Monitoring of Heparin Anticoagulation in Hemodialysis: Rationale and Strategies

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are commonly used to prevent clotting of the hemodialysis extracorporeal circuit and optimize hemodialysis adequacy. There is no consensus on the optimal dosing for UFH and LMWHs during hemodialysis. In clinical practice, semiquantitative clotting scoring of the dialyzer and venous chamber may help to guide UFH and LMWH dose adjustment. Laboratory monitoring has not been shown to improve clinical outcomes and is therefore not routinely indicated in most hemodialysis patients. It might, however, be considered in select patients, such as those with extremes of body weight or history of repeated clotting or bleeding. Methods for laboratory monitoring include the activated partial thromboplastin time, activated clotting time, and antifactor Xa assays for UFH and antifactor Xa assay for LMWHs. Target ranges for anticoagulation in hemodialysis have been suggested but not clearly defined. When utilizing these tests, issues such as availability, standardization, interfering factors, and interpretation must be considered. In this narrative review, we discuss the rationale and methods of monitoring anticoagulation in hemodialysis.

Anticoagulation practices associated with bleeding and thrombosis in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; a multi-center secondary analysis

To determine associations between anticoagulation practices and bleeding and thrombosis during pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), we performed a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data which included 481 children (<19 years), between January 2012 and September 2014. The primary outcome was bleeding or thrombotic events. Bleeding events included a blood product transfusion >80 ml/kg on any day, pulmonary hemorrhage, or intracranial bleeding, Thrombotic events included pulmonary emboli, intracranial clot, limb ischemia, cardiac clot, and arterial cannula or entire circuit change. Bleeding occurred in 42% of patients. Five percent of subjects thrombosed, of which 89% also bled. Daily bleeding odds were independently associated with day prior activated clotting time (ACT) (OR 1.03, 95% CI= 1.00, 1.05, p=0.047) and fibrinogen levels (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84, 0.96, p <0.001). Thrombosis odds decreased with increased day prior heparin dose (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81, 0.97, p=0.006). Lower ACT values and increased fibrinogen levels may be considered to decrease the odds of bleeding. Use of this single measure, however, may not be sufficient alone to guide optimal anticoagulation practice during ECMO.

D-dimer Testing in Pulmonary Embolism with a Focus on Potential Pitfalls: A Narrative Review

D-dimer is a multifaceted biomarker of concomitant activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis, which is routinely used for ruling out pulmonary embolism (PE) and/or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) combined with a clinical pretest probability assessment. The intended use of the tests depends largely on the assay used, and local guidance should be applied. D-dimer testing may suffer from diagnostic errors occurring throughout the pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical phases of the testing process. This review aims to provide an overview of D-dimer testing and its value in diagnosing PE and discusses the variables that may impact the quality of its laboratory assessment.

Analytical performance of a new immunoturbidimetric D‐dimer assay and comparison with available assays

Background

The routine D‐dimer quantification to exclude venous thromboembolism has led to the development of many assays, the usefulness of which depends on their reliability and performance.

Objective

We evaluated the analytical performances of the immunoturbidimetric Yumizen G DDi 2 assay (HORIBA Medical, Montpellier, France) performed on the Yumizen G800 analyzer and compared it with other available D‐dimer assays.

Methods

Within‐run and between‐run imprecision were evaluated using low‐ and high‐level quality‐control plasma samples. Interference due to hemolysis, icterus, lipemia, rheumatoid factor (RF), or heterophilic antibodies (human antimouse antibodies [HAMAs]) was evaluated by spiking plasma samples with hemolysate, bilirubin, Intralipid, RF, or HAMAs. The measurements obtained with the different D‐dimer assays were compared using Passing‐Bablok regression analysis and Bland‐Altman plot method, using fresh citrated plasma samples collected from 66 consecutive routine patients with a wide range of D‐dimer concentrations.

Results

Within‐ and between‐run variation coefficients for the Yumizen G DDi 2 assay ranged from 1.7% to 5.8% and from 2.8% to 5.5%, respectively. Hemolysis and icterus did not have any effect up to 10 g/L hemoglobin and 300 mg/L bilirubin. Lipemia seemed to generate an underestimation of D‐dimer concentration when the Intralipid concentration was >5 g/L. RF and HAMAs did not have any effect. The Passing‐Bablok and Bland‐Altman analyses showed small differences with other available D‐dimer assays, which were more pronounced with increasing values.

Conclusions

Its analytical performances and main technical features indicate that the new Yumizen G DDi 2 assay is suitable for the rapid quantification of D‐dimer in clinical hemostasis laboratories.

Pre-analytical variables in haemostasis: Findings from the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment scheme for Blood Coagulation (UK NEQAS BC) haemolysis exercise

INTRODUCTION

Haemolysis is considered one of the major contributors of nonconformities and sample rejection in coagulation testing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two lyophilized plasmas were distributed to 800 centres registered for prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and either Clauss fibrinogen or thrombin time (TT) in the UK NEQAS BC programme. The same pool of normal plasma was used to prepare both samples, to one of which red blood cell haemolysate was added to mimic haemolysis at 3 g/L haemoglobin concentration. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire about their laboratory approach to dealing with haemolysed samples, including strategies used to deal with different levels of haemolysis.

RESULTS

Results for tests performed did not show great differences between the two samples. It should be noted that artificially constructed haemolysed samples may not behave in the same way as patient samples (ie, may not be commutable). However, the possibility of carrying out a large multicentre study for detection of haemolysis was demonstrated. Inconsistency in practice was observed with 226/551 (41%) of centres indicated they reject haemolysed samples solely on visual checks, and 163 (30%) using initial visual checks with further sample rejection evaluation by analyser flags. Furthermore, 333 (72%) of centres indicated that the level of haemolysis affects sample rejection decisions, while 132 (28%) stated it did not.

CONCLUSION

Variability of responses for dealing with haemolysed samples reflects a lack of clear consistency in the pre-analytical area of sample processing.

Revisiting the effects of spectral interfering substances in optical end-point coagulation assays

INTRODUCTION

Hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia (HIL) are common pre-analytical variables in the clinical laboratory. Understanding their effects on coagulation laboratory results is essential.

METHODS

HIL effects on the prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), dilute Russell's viper venom time (DRVVT), thrombin time (TT), and protein C chromogenic activity (CFx) were evaluated on the ACL TOP 750 optical analyzer and STA-R Evolution mechanical analyzer (PT and APTT only) by spiking normal donor, patient, and commercial control samples with varying concentrations of hemolysate, bilirubin, or a lipid emulsion. The relative difference or bias compared to the original results was determined.

RESULTS

Hemolysis (H) indices up to 900 mg/dL did not affect the APTT, PT, DRVVT Confirm, TT, and CFx; however, H indices above approximately 200 mg/dL resulted in a false-negative DRVVT screen and screen/confirm ratio in samples with a lupus anticoagulant. There was an artifactual prolongation of the PT and APTT when conjugated bilirubin was dissolved in aqueous solvents and not when it was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. Icterus (I) indices up to 45 mg/dL did not result in significant (>15%) bias for all assays evaluated. The PT and APTT assays failed to produce a robust clot curve when the lipemia (L) index exceeded 6000 milliabsorbance units (mAbs), and the TT and DRVVT assays failed when the L index exceeded 3000 mAbs; the CFx assay was unaffected by lipemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Verification of the manufacturer's recommended interference thresholds is important since it may avoid inappropriate instrument flagging and/ or sample rejection.