Systematic application of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunophenotype profile for the identification of ZNF384 gene rearrangements in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Emerging molecular subtypes and therapies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Tremendous strides have been made in the molecular and cytogenetic classification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia based on gene expression profiling data, leading to an expansion of entities in the recent International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias and 2022 WHO Classification of Tumours: Haematolymphoid Tumors, 5th edition. This increased diagnostic and therapeutic complexity can be overwhelming, and this review compares nomenclature differences between the ICC and WHO 5th edition publications, compiles key features of each entity, and provides a diagnostic algorithmic approach. In covering B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), we divided the entities into established (those present in the revised 4th edition WHO) and novel (those added to either the ICC or WHO 5th edition) groups. The established B-ALL entities include B-ALL with BCR::ABL1 fusion, BCR::ABL1-like features, KMT2A rearrangement, ETV6::RUNX1 rearrangement, high hyperdiploidy, hypodiploidy (focusing on near haploid and low hypodiploid), IGH::IL3 rearrangement, TCF3::PBX1 rearrangement, and iAMP21. The novel B-ALL entities include B-ALL with MYC rearrangement; DUX4 rearrangement; MEF2D rearrangement; ZNF384 or ZNF362 rearrangement, NUTM1 rearrangement; HLF rearrangement; UBTF::ATXN7L3/PAN3,CDX2; mutated IKZF1 N159Y; mutated PAX5 P80R; ETV6::RUNX1-like features; PAX5 alteration; mutated ZEB2 (p.H1038R)/IGH::CEBPE; ZNF384 rearranged-like; KMT2A-rearranged-like; and CRLF2 rearrangement (non-Ph-like). Classification of T-ALL is complex with some variability in how the subtypes are defined in recent literature. It was classified as early T-precursor lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma and T-ALL, NOS in the WHO revised 4th edition and WHO 5th edition. The ICC added an entity into early T-cell precursor ALL, BCL11B-activated, and also added provisional entities subclassified based on transcription factor families that are aberrantly activated.

International Consensus Classification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma

The updated International Consensus Classification (ICC) of B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) includes both revisions to subtypes previously outlined in the 2016 WHO classification and several newly described entities. The ICC classification incorporates recent clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular data, with a particular emphasis on whole transcriptome analysis and gene expression (GEX) clustering studies. B-ALL classification is modified to further subclassify BCR::ABL1-positive B-ALL and hypodiploid B-ALL. Additionally, nine new categories of B-ALL are defined, including seven that contain distinguishing gene rearrangements, as well as two new categories that are characterized by a specific single gene mutation. Four provisional entities are also included in the updated B-ALL classification, although definitive identification of these subtypes requires GEX studies. T-ALL classification is also updated to incorporate BCL11B-activating rearrangements into early T-precursor (ETP) ALL taxonomy. Additionally, eight new provisional entities are added to the T-ALL subclassification. The clinical implications of the new entities are discussed, as are practical approaches to the use of different technologies in diagnosis. The enhanced specificity of the new classification will allow for improved risk stratification and optimized treatment plans for patients with ALL.

International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data

The classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias was last updated in 2016 within a collaboration between the World Health Organization (WHO), the Society for Hematopathology, and the European Association for Haematopathology. This collaboration was primarily based on input from a clinical advisory committees (CACs) composed of pathologists, hematologists, oncologists, geneticists, and bioinformaticians from around the world. The recent advances in our understanding of the biology of hematologic malignancies, the experience with the use of the 2016 WHO classification in clinical practice, and the results of clinical trials have indicated the need for further revising and updating the classification. As a continuation of this CAC-based process, the authors, a group with expertise in the clinical, pathologic, and genetic aspects of these disorders, developed the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias. Using a multiparameter approach, the main objective of the consensus process was the definition of real disease entities, including the introduction of new entities and refined criteria for existing diagnostic categories, based on accumulated data. The ICC is aimed at facilitating diagnosis and prognostication of these neoplasms, improving treatment of affected patients, and allowing the design of innovative clinical trials.

Immunophenotypic characteristics of ZNF384 rearrangement compared with BCR-ABL1, KMT2A rearrangement, and other adult B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

ZNF384 rearrangement has been recently identified as a new subtype of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). However, comprehensive studies clarifying immunophenotypic features and discriminating them from non-ZNF384 in adult BCP-ALL remain scarce to date.

METHODS

Flow cytometric assessments were retrospectively performed in 43 patients with ZNF384 rearrangement, 45 with BCR-ABL1, 29 with KMT2A rearrangement and 44 with other BCP-ALL in the analysis cohort.

RESULTS

CD33- and CD13-positive frequencies were significantly higher in patients with ZNF384 rearrangement than in those with non-ZNF384; however, no significant difference was observed in CD10- and CD123-positive frequencies. Analysis of antigen-positive cell proportion and median fluorescence intensity (MFI) further indicated that patients with ZNF384 rearrangement had significantly lower CD10 and higher CD33, CD13, and CD123 proportion and MFI. However, compared with KMT2A rearrangement, the CD10 expression in patients with ZNF384 rearrangement was higher, with the median percentage and MFI of 36.16 (3.63-94.79)% versus 4.53 (0.03-21.00)%, and 4.50 (0.86-32.26) versus 2.06 (0.87-4.04), respectively (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, compared with BCR-ABL1 and other BCP-ALL, ZNF384 rearrangement had significantly higher CD33 and CD13 proportion and MFI (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05, respectively). In addition, higher CD123 proportion and MFI in ZNF384 rearrangement than those in the other three groups were reported for the first time (p < 0.01). A flow cytometry scoring system, including CD10%, CD33MFI, CD13%, and CD123MFI, was proposed and verified to predict ZNF384 rearrangement with high sensitivity and specificity, that is, 76.74% and 91.53% in the analysis and 87.50% and 91.30% in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The multiparameter immunophenotypic scoring system could suggest ZNF384 rearrangement.

Biologic and Therapeutic Implications of Genomic Alterations in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most successful paradigm of how risk-adapted therapy and detailed understanding of the genetic alterations driving leukemogenesis and therapeutic response may dramatically improve treatment outcomes, with cure rates now exceeding 90% in children. However, ALL still represents a leading cause of cancer-related death in the young, and the outcome for older adolescents and young adults with ALL remains poor. In the past decade, next generation sequencing has enabled critical advances in our understanding of leukemogenesis. These include the identification of risk-associated ALL subtypes (e.g., those with rearrangements of MEF2D, DUX4, NUTM1, ZNF384 and BCL11B; the PAX5 P80R and IKZF1 N159Y mutations; and genomic phenocopies such as Ph-like ALL) and the genomic basis of disease evolution. These advances have been complemented by the development of novel therapeutic approaches, including those that are of mutation-specific, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and those that are mutation-agnostic, including antibody and cellular immunotherapies, and protein degradation strategies such as proteolysis-targeting chimeras. Herein, we review the genetic taxonomy of ALL with a focus on clinical implications and the implementation of genomic diagnostic approaches.