International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) recommendations for processing of blood samples for coagulation testing

Reduce energy consumption in your laboratory - switch ultra-low temperature freezers from - 80 °C to -70 °C. A pilot study on short term storage of plasma samples for coagulation testing

It is common practice in laboratories to store biological samples in ultra-low temperature (ULT) freezers. There is growing interest in raising the temperature of ULT freezers in order to save energy and reduce expenses, as energy conservation becomes increasingly important and sustainable laboratory practices gain popularity. In our laboratory, plasma samples are stored for three months for diagnostic purposes. We therefore took the opportunity to investigate the effect of two different storage temperatures (-70 °C vs -80 °C), on activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), factor VIII (FVIII), international normalized ratio (INR) and factor VII (FVII) measurements on paired plasma samples collected from 26 individuals after three months of storage. Automated coagulation analysers CS-5100 and ACL TOP were used to perform the tests. We found no consistent difference between the two storage temperatures for any of the four coagulation parameters (all p-values > 0.05). We conclude that the temperature of ULT freezers used to store plasma samples for APTT, FVIII, INR, and FVII measurements can be safely increased from -80 to -70 °C without affecting the stability of the samples.

International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) recommendations for the performance and interpretation of activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time mixing tests

This guidance document has been prepared on behalf of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH). The aim of the document is to provide guidance and recommendations for the performance and interpretation of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT) plasma mixing tests in clinical laboratories in all regions of the world. The following areas are included in this document: preanalytical, analytical, postanalytical, and quality assurance considerations as they relate to the proper performance and interpretation of plasma mixing tests. The recommendations are based on good laboratory practice, published data in peer-reviewed literature, and expert opinion.

Intravenous lipid emulsion interference in coagulation testing: an ex vivo analysis

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous lipid emulsion is used in the rescue treatment of certain poisonings. A complication is interference with laboratory analyses. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of intravenous lipid emulsion on routine laboratory analysis of coagulation parameters ex vivo and determine if any of the analytical techniques remain reliable.

METHODS

Samples were obtained from 19 healthy volunteers and divided in triplicate. One sample served as a control, and the other two were diluted to simulate the treatment of an average adult with Intralipid® 20 per cent Fresenius Kabi 100 mL (dilution-1) or 500 mL (dilution-2). Coagulation tests performed were prothrombin time, activated prothrombin time, D-dimer concentration and fibrinogen. Coagulation testing was performed by three techniques. Test-1 was performed on a Sysmex CN6000 analyzer. Test-2 was performed with a manual mechanical endpoint method using the semi-automated Stago KC4 Delta. Test-3 involved high-speed centrifugation before repeat testing on the Sysmex CN6000 analyzer.

RESULTS

For test-1, only nine (47 per cent) samples in dilution-1 could be analyzed for coagulation tests, and no coagulation tests could be analyzed for dilution-2 because of lipaemia. For test-2 and test-3, all samples could be analyzed, and all results of both testing methods fell within the limits of the laboratory reference range.

DISCUSSION

Difficulties in laboratory analysis of patients having received intravenous lipid emulsion are due to multiple factors. Most automated coagulation analyzers use optical measurements, which can be unreliable in the presence of a high intravenous lipid concentration. By altering the lipaemia in the testing solution using high-speed centrifugation or by using manual mechanical endpoint detection, we were able to obtain reliable results. These findings are limited by the use of an ex vivo method and healthy volunteers.

CONCLUSIONS

This ex vivo model confirms that Intralipid® interferes with routine coagulation studies. It is important that clinicians are aware and inform their laboratories of its administration.

Pleiotropic Effects of Heparin and its Monitoring in the Clinical Practice

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) was uncovered in 1916, has been used as an anticoagulant since 1935, and has been listed in the World Health Organization's Model List of Essential Medicines. Despite the availability of many other anticoagulants, the use of heparin (either low molecular weight heparin [LMWH] or UFH) is still substantial. Heparin has pleotropic effects including anticoagulant and several nonanticoagulant properties such as antiproliferative, anti-inflammatory activity, and anticomplement effects. Although UFH has been widely replaced by LMWH, UFH is still the preferred anticoagulant of choice for patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and patients with high-risk mechanical cardiac valves requiring temporary bridging with a parenteral anticoagulant. UFH is a highly negatively charged molecule and binds many positively charged molecules, hence has unpredictable pharmacokinetics, and variable anticoagulant effect on an individual patient basis. Therefore, anticoagulant effects of UFH may not be proportional to the dose of UFH given to any individual patient. In this review, we discuss the anticoagulant and nonanticoagulant activities of UFH, differences between UFH and LMWH, when to use UFH, different methods of monitoring the anticoagulant effects of UFH (including activated partial thromboplastin time, heparin anti-Xa activity level, and activated clotting time), while discussing pros and cons related to each method and comparison of clinical outcomes in patients treated with UFH monitored with different methods based on available evidence.

How to investigate mild to moderate bleeding disorders and bleeding disorder of unknown cause

A bleeding tendency is one of the most common complaints observed by hematologists. It is challenging to differentiate a clinically insignificant bleeding from a bleeding phenotype that requires hemostatic evaluation and medical intervention. A thorough review of personal and familial history, objective assessment of bleeding severity using a bleeding assessment tool, and a focused physical examination are critical to correctly identifying suspected patients with mild to moderate bleeding disorders (MBDs). A basic laboratory work-up should be performed in all patients referred for a bleeding tendency. If a hemostatic abnormality is found such as evidence of von Willebrand disease, a platelet function disorder, or a coagulation factor deficiency, more extensive testing should be performed to further characterize the bleeding disorder. Conversely, if all results are normal the patient is considered to have bleeding disorder of unknown cause (BDUC). For patients with BDUC, further evaluation may include non-routine testing to look for rare bleeding disorders not detected by routine hemostasis tests, such as thrombomodulin-associated coagulopathy, tissue factor pathway inhibitor-related bleeding disorder, hyperfibrinolytic-bleeding disorders or impaired tissue factor production. In this review, we summarize the stepwise diagnostic procedure in MBDs and provide some insights into the biological features of BDUC.

Fibrinogen: Structure, abnormalities and laboratory assays

Fibrinogen is the primary precursor protein for the fibrin clot, which is the final target of blood clotting. It is also an acute phase reactant that can vary under physiologic and inflammatory conditions. Disorders in fibrinogen concentration and/or function have been variably linked to the risk of bleeding and/or thrombosis. Fibrinogen assays are commonly used in the management of bleeding as well as the treatment of thrombosis. This chapter examines the structure of fibrinogen, its role in hemostasis as well as in bleeding abnormalities and measurement thereof with respect to clinical management.

International council for standardisation in haematology recommendations on fibrinogen assays, thrombin clotting time and related tests in the investigation of bleeding disorders

This guidance was prepared on behalf of the International Council for Standardisation in Haematology (ICSH) by an international working group of clinicians and scientists. The document focuses on tests and assays used for the assessment of fibrinogen function, particularly in the scenario of bleeding disorders. Thrombin clotting time (TT) is used as a screening test in some laboratories and also has some utility when direct anticoagulants are in use. The Clauss fibrinogen assay remains the method of choice for the assessment of fibrinogen function, but there are some situations where the results may be misleading. Prothrombin time derived fibrinogen assays are frequently used, but should be interpreted with caution; the results are not interchangeable between different methods and fibrinogen can be overestimated in certain clinical scenarios. Viscoelastic point of care methods may be helpful in emergency situations, while Reptilase time (and similar tests) are useful combined with TT in distinguishing heparin contamination of samples (i.e., if an incorrect blood draw is suspected) and the presence of direct thrombin inhibitors. Fibrinogen antigen assays should be used in the investigation of functional fibrinogen abnormalities; fibrinogen antigen and genetic testing are recommended in the confirmation of congenital fibrinogen disorders. The following recommendations for fibrinogen function assessment are based on published literature and expert opinion and should supplement local regulations and standards.

Optimized protocol for quantification of extracellular nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide: evaluating clinical parameters and pre-analytical factors for translational research

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+), a coenzyme for more than 500 enzymes, plays a central role in energy production, metabolism, cellular signaling, and DNA repair. Until recently, NAD+ was primarily considered to be an intracellular molecule (iNAD+), however, its extracellular species (eNAD+) has recently been discovered and has since been associated with a multitude of pathological conditions. Therefore, accurate quantification of eNAD+ in bodily fluids such as plasma is paramount to answer important research questions. In order to create a clinically meaningful and reliable quantitation method, we analyzed the relationship of cell lysis, routine clinical laboratory parameters, blood collection techniques, and pre-analytical processing steps with measured plasma eNAD+ concentrations. Initially, NAD+ levels were assessed both intracellularly and extracellularly. Intriguingly, the concentration of eNAD+ in plasma was found to be approximately 500 times lower than iNAD+ in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (0.253 ± 0.02 μM vs. 131.8 ± 27.4 μM, p = 0.007, respectively). This stark contrast suggests that cellular damage or cell lysis could potentially affect the levels of eNAD+ in plasma. However, systemic lactate dehydrogenase in patient plasma, a marker of cell damage, did not significantly correlate with eNAD+ (n = 33; r = -0.397; p = 0.102). Furthermore, eNAD+ was negatively correlated with increasing c-reactive protein (CRP, n = 33; r = -0.451; p = 0.020), while eNAD+ was positively correlated with increasing hemoglobin (n = 33; r = 0.482; p = 0.005). Next, variations in blood drawing, sample handling and pre-analytical processes were examined. Sample storage durations at 4°C (0-120 min), temperature (0° to 25°C), cannula sizes for blood collection and tourniquet times (0 - 120 s) had no statistically significant effect on eNAD+ (p > 0.05). On the other hand, prolonged centrifugation (> 5 min) and a faster braking mode of the centrifuge rotor (< 4 min) resulted in a significant decrease in eNAD+ levels (p < 0.05). Taken together, CRP and hemoglobin appeared to be mildly correlated with eNAD+ levels whereas cell damage was not correlated significantly to eNAD+ levels. The blood drawing trial did not show any influence on eNAD+, in contrast, the preanalytical steps need to be standardized for accurate eNAD+ measurement. This work paves the way towards robust eNAD+ measurements, for use in future clinical and translational research, and provides an optimized hands-on protocol for reliable eNAD+ quantification in plasma.

Coagulation Testing in Real-World Setting: Insights From a Comprehensive Survey

The objective of this survey was to gain a real-world perspective on coagulation testing by evaluating the availability of various coagulation laboratory tests, assessing specific analytic and postanalytic steps in clinical laboratories in Korea.Participants were surveyed using a 65-question questionnaire specifically focused on their coagulation testing practices related to prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), plasma-mixing studies, lupus anticoagulant (LA) tests, platelet function tests, coagulation factor assays, and the composition of hemostasis and thrombosis test panels. The survey was performed between July and September 2022.The survey achieved a 77.9% (81 of 104) response rate. PT or aPTT tests were performed directly at all participating institutions, followed by D-dimer and fibrinogen tests, platelet function test, and plasma-mixing studies in order of frequency. Variations existed in the performance of mixing test and LA assessment. Patterns of coagulating testing differed depending on the size of the hospital. The survey revealed that most laboratories conducted coagulation tests following the international guidelines such as Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines and the Korean Laboratory Certification system. However, some coagulation tests, including mixing test and LA tests, are yet to be standardized in Korea.Continuous education on coagulation test methods and internal and external quality control are required to encourage laboratories to enhance the performance of coagulation testing.

Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time and Prothrombin Time Mixing Studies: Current State of the Art

Mixing studies have long been in the clinical laboratory armamentarium for investigating unexpected, prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or prothrombin time (PT). The purpose of the mixing study is to identify whether the aPTT/PT prolongation is secondary to a factor deficiency versus an inhibitor, which would present as a "corrected" and "noncorrected" mixing study, respectively. The differentiation between a factor deficiency and inhibitor may likely further direct clinical decisions, including additional diagnostic testing or factor replacement therapy. While aPTT/PT mixing studies are simple tests to perform, there is a lack of standardization for both the testing protocol and the interpretation of what is considered to be a corrected or noncorrected mixing study result. This review will describe the common indications for the mixing test, preanalytic variables that may affect mixing study performance, and describe several methods for interpreting the results of aPTT and PT mixing tests.

Laboratory Evaluation of Antithrombin, Protein C, and Protein S

Thrombophilia is a complex disease process, clinically manifesting in various forms of venous thromboembolism. Although both genetic and acquired (or environmental) risks factors have been reported, the presence of a genetic defect (antithrombin [AT], protein C [PC], protein S [PS]) is considered three of the major contributing factors of thrombophilia. The presence of each of these risk factors can be established by clinical laboratory analysis; however, the clinical provider and laboratory personnel must understand the testing limitations and shortcomings associated with the assays for these factors to be able to ensure an accurate diagnosis. This article will describe the major pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical issues associated with the various types of assays and discuss evidence-based algorithms for analyzing AT, PC, and PS in plasma.

Direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists in emergencies: comparison of management in an observational study

Background

Restoring hemostasis in patients on oral anticoagulants presenting with major hemorrhage (MH) or before surgical intervention has changed, with the replacement of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

Objectives

To observe the difference in urgent hemostatic management between patients on VKA and those on DOACs.

Methods

A multicenter observational study evaluated the variation in laboratory testing, hemostatic management, mortality, and hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients on VKA or DOACs presenting with MH or urgent hemostatic restoration.

Results

Of the 1194 patients analyzed, 783 had MH (61% VKA) and 411 required urgent hemostatic restoration before surgery (56% VKA). Compared to the international normalized ratio (97.6%), plasma DOAC levels were measured less frequently (<45%), and the time taken from admission for the coagulation sample to reach the laboratory varied widely (median, 52.3 minutes; IQR, 24.8-206.7). No significant plasma DOAC level (<50 ng/mL) was found in up to 19% of patients. There was a poor relationship between plasma DOAC level and the usage of a hemostatic agent. When compared with patients receiving VKA (96.5%) or dabigatran (93.7%), fewer patients prescribed a factor Xa inhibitor (75.5%) received a prohemostatic reversal agent. The overall 30-day mortality for MH (mean: 17.8%) and length of stay (LOS) (median: 8.7 days) was similar between VKA and DOAC patients.

Conclusion

In DOAC patients, when compared to those receiving VKA, plasma DOAC levels were measured less frequently than the international normalized ratio and had a poor relationship with administering a hemostatic reversal agent. In addition, following MH, mortality and LOS were similar between VKA and DOAC patients.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in convalescent plasma of donors recovered from mild COVID-19 infection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Passive immunization by the infusion of convalescent plasma (CP) obtained from patients who have recently recovered from COVID-19, thus having antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, is a potential strategy to reduce the severity of illness. A high prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA) in patients with COVID-19 has been reported during the pandemic, raising a concern whether the use of CP could increase the risk of thrombosis in transfused patients. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of APLA in COVID-19 CP (CCP) in order to assess the potential prothrombotic influence of transfused CCP to COVID-19 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied the prevalence of APLA in 122 CCP samples collected from healthy donors who recovered from mild-COVID-19 at two time periods: September 2020-January 2021 (defined as 'early period' samples) and April-May 2021 (defined as 'late period' samples). Thirty-four healthy subjects unexposed to COVID-19 were used as controls.

RESULTS

APLA were present in 7 of 122 (6%) CCP samples. One donor had anti-β2-glycoprotein 1(anti-β2GP1) IgG, one had anti-β2GP1 IgM and five had lupus anticoagulant (LAC) using silica clotting time (SCT), all in 'late period' donors. In the control group, one subject had anti-β2GP1 IgG, two had LAC using dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) and four had LAC SCT (both LAC SCT and LAC dRVVT in one subject).

CONCLUSION

The low prevalence of APLA in CCP donors reassures the safety of CCP administration to patients with severe COVID-19.

Handling of lipemic samples in the clinical laboratory

Interferences in the clinical laboratory may lead physicians misinterpret results for some biological analytes. The most common analytical interferences in the clinical laboratory include hemolysis, icterus and lipemia. Lipemia is defined as turbidity in a sample caused by the accumulation of lipoproteins, mainly very-low density lipoproteins (VLDL) and chylomicrons. Several methods are available for the detection of lipemic samples, including the lipemic index, or triglyceride quantification in serum or plasma samples, or mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCHC) concentration in blood samples. According to the European Directive 98/79/CE, it is the responsibility of clinical laboratories to monitor the presence of interfering substances that may affect the measurement of an analyte. There is an urgent need to standardize interference studies and the way interferences are reported by manufacturers. Several methods are currently available to remove interference from lipemia and enable accurate measurement of biological quantities. The clinical laboratory should establish a protocol for the handling of lipemic samples according to the biological quantity to be tested.

Preanalytical Variables in Hemostasis Testing

Hemostasis testing performed in clinical laboratories are critical for assessing hemorrhagic and thrombotic disorders. The assays performed can be used to provide the information required for diagnosis, risk assessment, efficacy of therapy, and therapeutic monitoring. As such, hemostasis tests should be performed to the highest level of quality, including the standardization, implementation, and monitoring of all phases of the testing, which include the preanalytical, analytical, and post-analytical phases. It is well established that the preanalytical phase is the most critical component of the testing process, being the hands-on activities, including patient preparation for blood collection, as well as the actual blood collection, including sample identification and the post-collection handling to include sample transportation, processing, and storage of samples when testing is not performed immediately. The purpose of this article is to provide an update to the previous edition of coagulation testing-related preanalytical variables (PAV) and, when properly addressed and performed, can reduce the most common causes of errors in the hemostasis laboratory.

Laboratory Evaluation of Thrombophilia

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs typically in the veins of the lower extremities and/or as pulmonary embolism. There is a myriad of causes of VTE ranging from provoked causes (e.g., surgery, cancer) to unprovoked causes (e.g., inherited abnormalities) or multiple factors that combine to initiate the cause. Thrombophilia is a complex, multi-factorial disease that may result in VTE. The mechanism(s) and causes of thrombophilia are complex and not completely understood. In healthcare today, only some answers about the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and prevention of thrombophilia have been elucidated. The laboratory analysis for thrombophilia is not consistently applied, and has changed over time, but remains varied by providers and laboratories as well. Both groups must establish harmonized guidelines for patient selection and appropriate conditions for analysis of inherited and acquired risk factors. This chapter discusses the pathophysiology of thrombophilia, and evidence-based medicine guidelines discuss the optimum laboratory testing algorithms and protocols for selection and analyzing VTE patients to ensure a cost-effective use of limited resources.

FVIII inhibitor surveillance in children with hemophilia A in Indonesia: a report from the Indonesian Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Working Group

Background

Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor diagnosis and surveillance in Indonesia are challenging owing to geographic conditions and the lack of laboratory facilities nationwide for inhibitor assays. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of FVIII inhibitors in children diagnosed with hemophilia A (HA) in Indonesia.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 12 hospitals in eight provinces of Indonesia between 2020 and 2021. Factor VIII inhibitor screening was performed in a central hemostasis laboratory for all children with HA (≤18 yr) who had received a minimum of 10 exposure days to clotting factor concentrates. The FVIII inhibitor titer was determined using the Bethesda assay.

Results

Children (388) were enrolled in this study, including 219 (56.4%), 131 (33.8%), and 38 (9.4%) with severe, moderate, and mild HA, respectively. The prevalence of children who developed FVIII inhibitors was 37 out of 388 (9.6%). Factor VIII inhibitors were found in 25/219 (11.4%) severe, 11/131 (8.3%) moderate, and 1/38 (2.6%) children with mild HA. Thirteen children had low-titer inhibitors and 24 had high-titer inhibitors, with a median of 9.44 (1.48‒412.0) Bethesda Units. Among 13 children with low-titer inhibitors, eight underwent a confirmation test, of which five tested negative and were classified as transient. A significant difference in annual joint bleeding rate was found between patients with low and high inhibitor titers and those without inhibitors (P＜0.001).

Conclusion

Factor VIII inhibitor prevalence in Indonesia was relatively low. However, the risk factors that may contribute to FVIII inhibitor development among Indonesian patients require further study.

Hematology and coagulation preanalytics for clinical chemists: Factors intrinsic to the sample and extrinsic to the patient

In hematology and coagulation, diligence in the preanalytical phase of testing is of critical importance to obtaining reliable test results. If the sample used for testing is unsuitable, even outstanding analytical procedures and technology cannot produce a clinically-reliable result. Therefore, the intent of this manuscript is to review preanalytical factors intrinsic to the sample that affect the hematology and coagulation testing. Factors intrinsic to the sample (excluding in vivo anomalies) can be controlled, theoretically, by phlebotomists (including nurses) and laboratorians in the preanalytical phase of testing. Furthermore, the management and prevention of such factors is highlighted. Erroneous control of preanalytical factors can produce laboratory errors.

Laboratory evaluation of a new integrative assay to phenotype plasma fibrinolytic system

BACKGROUND

There is currently no universal and standardized test available to phenotype plasma fibrinolytic system.

AIMS

Our main aims were to evaluate the performances of the 'global fibrinolysis capacity' assay (GFC) performed with the Lysis Timer® instrument, and to study the influence of some preanalytical conditions.

METHOD

Euglobulin clot lysis time (ECLT) and GFC were performed under several preanalytical conditions.

RESULTS

GFC showed satisfactory intra- and inter-run precision. Frozen controls and reagents showed stability over the studied period. There was no statistically significant difference between GFC assessed in plasma samples processed at 4 °C or at 20 °C. GFC assessed with frozen-thawed plasma samples was prolonged when compared to fresh samples (p = 0.014). The centrifugation scheme had no influence on PAI-1 activity levels, GFC and ECLT. Reference interval for GFC ranges from 29.3 (C I90% = 26.9-31.9) to 49.5 (90% CI = 45.9-52.2) minutes. In addition, a preliminary study in 40 healthy volunteers and 43 adult patients referred for investigation of a bleeding disorder was conducted to compare GFC and ECLT assays in their ability to classify samples with shortened or prolonged clot lysis times. Disagreements between ECLT and GFC were observed for 23 samples (out of 83), most of them minor.

CONCLUSION

GFC is suitable and convenient for a broad clinical use and can be performed with frozen-thawed plasma samples. Unlike ECLT, GFC is designed to take into account the balance between inhibitors and activators of the fibrinolytic system and could detect both hypo- and hyperfibrinolytic states. Whether it is as suitable as or even better than ECLT to detect a bleeding tendency due to a hyperactive fibrinolytic system deserves to be properly investigated.

The impact of environmental factors on external and internal specimen transport

The environment that a clinical specimen is exposed to is an important preanalytical factor in laboratory testing. There are numerous environmental conditions that a specimen may experience before it arrives at the clinical laboratory for analysis. Specimens collected at offsite locations are typically stored at the site and transported to the clinical laboratory via courier. Depending on the geographic location, season, method of storage and method of transport, the specimen can experience varying climate conditions that can lead to inaccurate test results. Specimens collected within the healthcare institution are not exempt from suboptimal storage and transport environments. For example, specimens transported via pneumatic tube systems can experience extreme agitation and rapid accelerations and decelerations. Suboptimal storage and transport temperatures occur less frequently within health systems due to multiple regulatory requirements for temperature monitoring; however, temperature monitoring may not occur at every stage of the preanalytical phase. This review will highlight both internal and external environmental conditions that can cause preanalytical errors in clinical laboratory testing. Strategies to mitigate environmentally-induced preanalytical errors and regulatory gaps for environmental monitoring in the preanalytical phase will also be discussed.

D-dimer Testing in Pulmonary Embolism with a Focus on Potential Pitfalls: A Narrative Review

D-dimer is a multifaceted biomarker of concomitant activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis, which is routinely used for ruling out pulmonary embolism (PE) and/or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) combined with a clinical pretest probability assessment. The intended use of the tests depends largely on the assay used, and local guidance should be applied. D-dimer testing may suffer from diagnostic errors occurring throughout the pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical phases of the testing process. This review aims to provide an overview of D-dimer testing and its value in diagnosing PE and discusses the variables that may impact the quality of its laboratory assessment.