1
|
Day EK, Galbraith NJ, Ward HJT, Roxburgh CS. Volume-outcome relationship in intra-abdominal robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review. J Robot Surg 2022; 17:811-826. [PMID: 36315379 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01461-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
As robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) expands to smaller centres, platforms are shared between specialities. Healthcare providers must consider case volume and mix required to maintain quality and cost-effectiveness. This can be informed, in-part, by the volume-outcome relationship. We perform a systematic review to describe the volume-outcome relationship in intra-abdominal robotic-assisted surgery to report on suggested minimum volumes standards. A literature search of Medline, NICE Evidence Search, Health Technology Assessment Database and Cochrane Library using the terms: "robot*", "surgery", "volume" and "outcome" was performed. The included procedures were gynecological: hysterectomy, urological: partial and radical nephrectomy, cystectomy, prostatectomy, and general surgical: colectomy, esophagectomy. Hospital and surgeon volume measures and all reported outcomes were analysed. 41 studies, including 983,149 procedures, met the inclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and the retrieved data was synthesised in a narrative review. Significant volume-outcome relationships were described in relation to key outcome measures, including operative time, complications, positive margins, lymph node yield and cost. Annual surgeon and hospital volume thresholds were described. We concluded that in centres with an annual volume of fewer than 10 cases of a given procedure, having multiple surgeons performing these procedures led to worse outcomes and, therefore, opportunities should be sought to perform other complimentary robotic procedures or undertake joint cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth K Day
- Urology Department, University College London Hospital, Westmoreland Street, London, UK.
| | - Norman J Galbraith
- School of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Hester J T Ward
- Public Health Scotland, Gyle Square, Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Campbell S Roxburgh
- School of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morii Y, Osawa T, Suzuki T, Shinohara N, Harabayashi T, Ishikawa T, Tanikawa T, Yamashina H, Ogasawara K. Cost comparison between open radical cystectomy, laparoscopic radical cystectomy, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review of segmental costs. BMC Urol 2019; 19:110. [PMID: 31703573 PMCID: PMC6842244 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0533-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Robot-assisted radical cystectomy is becoming a common treatment for bladder carcinoma. However, in comparison with open radical cystectomy, its cost-effectiveness has not been confirmed. Although few published reviews have compared total costs between the two surgical procedures, no study has compared segmental costs and explained their impact on total costs. Methods A systematic review was conducted based on studies on the segmental costs of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to provide insight into cost-effective management methods for radical cystectomy. The segmental costs included operating, robot-related, complication, and length of stay costs. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the impact of the annual number of cases on the per-case robot-related costs. Results We identified two studies that compared open and laparoscopic surgeries and nine that compared open and robotic surgeries. Open radical cystectomy costs were higher than those of robotic surgeries in two retrospective single-institution studies, while robot-assisted radical cystectomy costs were higher in 1 retrospective single-institution study, 1 randomized controlled trial, and 4 large database studies. Operating costs were higher for robotic surgery, and accounted for 63.1–70.5% of the total robotic surgery cost. Sensitivity analysis revealed that robot-related costs were not a large proportion of total surgery costs in institutions with a large number of cases but accounted for a large proportion of total costs in centers with a small number of cases. Conclusions The results show that robot-assisted radical cystectomy is more expensive than open radical cystectomy. The most effective methods to decrease costs associated with robotic surgery include a decrease in operating time and an increase in the number of cases. Further research is required on the cost-effectiveness of surgeries, including quality measures such as quality of life and quality-adjusted life years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuhiro Morii
- Graduate school of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kitaku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takahiro Osawa
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, N14, W5, KitaKu, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Teppei Suzuki
- Hokkaido University of Education, Art, and Sports Business, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kitaku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Nobuo Shinohara
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, N14, W5, KitaKu, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Toru Harabayashi
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido Cancer Center, 3-54, Kikusui 4-2, Shiroishiku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Tomoki Ishikawa
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kitaku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.,Institute for Health Economics and Policy, No.11 Toyo-kaiji Bldg, 1-5-11, Nishi-Shimbashi,Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takumi Tanikawa
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University of Science, 7-Jo 15-4-1 Maeda, Teine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hiroko Yamashina
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kitaku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Katsuhiko Ogasawara
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kitaku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Osawa T, Abe T, Takada N, Ito YM, Murai S, Shinohara N. Validation of the nomogram for predicting 90-day mortality after radical cystectomy in a Japanese cohort. Int J Urol 2018; 25:699-700. [PMID: 29682815 DOI: 10.1111/iju.13584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Osawa
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, , Japan
| | - Takashige Abe
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, , Japan
| | - Norikata Takada
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, , Japan
| | - Yoichi M Ito
- Department of Biostatistics, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Sachiyo Murai
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, , Japan
| | - Nobuo Shinohara
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, , Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sugihara T, Yasunaga H, Matsui H, Nagao G, Ishikawa A, Fujimura T, Fukuhara H, Fushimi K, Ohori M, Homma Y. Accessibility to surgical robot technology and prostate-cancer patient behavior for prostatectomy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2017; 47:647-651. [PMID: 28419326 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyx052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2017] [Accepted: 04/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To examine how surgical robot emergence affects prostate-cancer patient behavior in seeking radical prostatectomy focusing on geographical accessibility. Methods In Japan, robotic surgery was approved in April 2012. Based on data in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between April 2012 and March 2014, distance to nearest surgical robot and interval days to radical prostatectomy (divided by mean interval in 2011: % interval days to radical prostatectomy) were calculated for individual radical prostatectomy cases at non-robotic hospitals. Caseload changes regarding distance to nearest surgical robot and robot introduction were investigated. Change in % interval days to radical prostatectomy was evaluated by multivariate analysis including distance to nearest surgical robot, age, comorbidity, hospital volume, operation type, hospital academic status, bed volume and temporal progress. Results % Interval days to radical prostatectomy became wider for distance to nearest surgical robot <30 km. When a surgical robot emerged within 30 and 10 km, the prostatectomy caseload in non-robot hospitals reduced by 13 and 18% within 6 months, respectively, while the robot hospitals gained +101% caseload (P < 0.01 for all) Multivariate analyses including 9759 open and 5052 non-robotic minimally invasive radical prostatectomies in 483 non-robot hospitals revealed a significant inverse association between distance to nearest surgical robot and % interval days to radical prostatectomy (B = -17.3% for distance to nearest surgical robot ≥30 km and -11.7% for 10-30 km versus distance to nearest surgical robot <10 km), while younger age, high-volume hospital, open-prostatectomy provider and temporal progress were other significant factors related to % interval days to radical prostatectomy widening (P < 0.05 for all). Conclusions Robotic surgery accessibility within 30 km would make patients less likely select conventional surgery. The nearer a robot was, the faster the caseload reduction was.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Sugihara
- Department of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo.,Department of Urology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo
| | - Hideo Yasunaga
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo
| | - Hiroki Matsui
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo
| | - Go Nagao
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Ishikawa
- Department of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo
| | | | | | - Kiyohide Fushimi
- Department of Health Care Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Makoto Ohori
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukio Homma
- Department of Urology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ikehata Y, Tanaka T, Ichihara K, Kobayashi K, Kitamura H, Takahashi S, Masumori N. Incidence and risk factors for acute kidney injury after radical cystectomy. Int J Urol 2016; 23:558-63. [DOI: 10.1111/iju.13104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2015] [Accepted: 03/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshinori Ikehata
- Department of Urology; Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine; Sapporo Hokkaido Japan
| | - Toshiaki Tanaka
- Department of Urology; Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine; Sapporo Hokkaido Japan
| | - Koji Ichihara
- Department of Urology; Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine; Sapporo Hokkaido Japan
| | - Ko Kobayashi
- Department of Urology; Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine; Sapporo Hokkaido Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kitamura
- Department of Urology; Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine; Sapporo Hokkaido Japan
| | - Satoshi Takahashi
- Department of Urology; Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine; Sapporo Hokkaido Japan
| | - Naoya Masumori
- Department of Urology; Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine; Sapporo Hokkaido Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Osawa T, Lee CT, Abe T, Takada N, Hafez KS, Montgomery JS, Weizer AZ, Hollenbeck BK, Skolarus TA, Murai S, Shinohara N, Morgan TM. A Multi-Center International Study Assessing the Impact of Differences in Baseline Characteristics and Perioperative Care Following Radical Cystectomy. Bladder Cancer 2016; 2:251-261. [PMID: 27376144 PMCID: PMC4927825 DOI: 10.3233/blc-150043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background: To identify potential avenues for quality improvement, we compared the variations in clinical practice and their association with perioperative morbidity and mortality following radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer in the United States (US) and Japan. Methods: We reviewed our retrospectively collected database of 2240 patients who underwent RC for bladder cancer at the University of Michigan (n = 1427) and in 21 Japanese institutions (n = 813) between 1997 and 2014. We performed a systematic comparison of clinical and perioperative factors and assessed predictors of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Death within 90 days of surgery was the primary outcome. Results: There were apparent differences between the two study populations. Notably, US patients had a significantly greater BMI and higher ASA score. In Japanese institutions, median postoperative hospital stay was significantly higher (40 days vs. 7 days, p < 0.001) and 90-day readmission rates were significantly lower (0.6% vs. 26.8% , p < 0.001). There was a total of 1372/2240 (61.2%) patients with complications within 90 days and 66/2240 (2.9%) patient deaths. Significant predictors of 90-day mortality were older age (OR 1.04, CI 1.01–1.07), higher body mass index (OR 1.07, CI 1.02–1.12), node-positive disease (OR 3.14, CI 1.78–5.47), increased blood loss (OR 1.02, CI 1.01–1.03), and major (Clavien-grade 3 or greater) complication (OR 3.29, CI 1.88–5.71). Conclusion: Despite major differences in baseline characteristics and care of cystectomy patients between the two study populations, peri-operative mortality rates proved to be comparable. This data supports an exploration of non-traditional factors that may influence mortality after cystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Osawa
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Urology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Cheryl T Lee
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Takashige Abe
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University , Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Khaled S Hafez
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Montgomery
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Alon Z Weizer
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Brent K Hollenbeck
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ted A Skolarus
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sachiyo Murai
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University , Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System , Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fujimura T, Menon M, Fukuhara H, Kume H, Suzuki M, Yamada Y, Niimi A, Nakagawa T, Igawa Y, Homma Y. Validation of an educational program balancing surgeon training and surgical quality control during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 2015; 23:160-6. [DOI: 10.1111/iju.12993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2015] [Accepted: 09/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuya Fujimura
- Department of Urology; Graduate School of Medicine; The University of Tokyo; Tokyo Japan
| | - Mani Menon
- Vattikuti Urology Institute; Henry Ford Hospital; Detroit Michigan USA
| | - Hiroshi Fukuhara
- Department of Urology; Graduate School of Medicine; The University of Tokyo; Tokyo Japan
| | - Haruki Kume
- Department of Urology; Graduate School of Medicine; The University of Tokyo; Tokyo Japan
| | - Motofumi Suzuki
- Department of Urology; Graduate School of Medicine; The University of Tokyo; Tokyo Japan
| | - Yuta Yamada
- Department of Urology; Graduate School of Medicine; The University of Tokyo; Tokyo Japan
| | - Aya Niimi
- Department of Urology; Graduate School of Medicine; The University of Tokyo; Tokyo Japan
| | - Tohru Nakagawa
- Department of Urology; Graduate School of Medicine; The University of Tokyo; Tokyo Japan
| | - Yasuhiko Igawa
- Department of Continence Medicine; Graduate School of Medicine; The University of Tokyo; Tokyo Japan
| | - Yukio Homma
- Department of Urology; Graduate School of Medicine; The University of Tokyo; Tokyo Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sugihara T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Matsui H, Fujimura T, Nishimatsu H, Fukuhara H, Kume H, Changhong Y, Kattan MW, Fushimi K, Homma Y. Robot-assisted versus other types of radical prostatectomy: population-based safety and cost comparison in Japan, 2012-2013. Cancer Sci 2014; 105:1421-6. [PMID: 25183452 PMCID: PMC4462377 DOI: 10.1111/cas.12523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2014] [Revised: 08/17/2014] [Accepted: 08/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
In 2012, Japanese national insurance started covering robot-assisted surgery. We carried out a population-based comparison between robot-assisted and three other types of radical prostatectomy to evaluate the safety of robot-assisted prostatectomy during its initial year. We abstracted data for 7202 open, 2483 laparoscopic, 1181 minimal incision endoscopic, and 2126 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies for oncological stage T3 or less from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database (April 2012-March 2013). Complication rate, transfusion rate, anesthesia time, postoperative length of stay, and cost were evaluated by pairwise one-to-one propensity-score matching and multivariable analyses with covariants of age, comorbidity, oncological stage, hospital volume, and hospital academic status. The proportion of robot-assisted radical prostatectomies dramatically increased from 8.6% to 24.1% during the first year. Compared with open, laparoscopic, and minimal incision endoscopic surgery, robot-assisted surgery was generally associated with a significantly lower complication rate (odds ratios, 0.25, 0.20, 0.33, respectively), autologous transfusion rate (0.04, 0.31, 0.10), homologous transfusion rate (0.16, 0.48, 0.14), lower cost excluding operation (differences, -5.1%, -1.8% [not significant], -10.8%) and shorter postoperative length of stay (-9.1%, +0.9% [not significant], -18.5%, respectively). However, robot-assisted surgery also resulted in a + 42.6% increase in anesthesia time and +52.4% increase in total cost compared with open surgery (all P < 0.05). Introduction of robotic surgery led to a dynamic change in prostate cancer surgery. Even in its initial year, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy was carried out with several favorable safety aspects compared to the conventional surgeries despite its having the longest anesthesia time and the highest cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Sugihara
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Urology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mir MC, Autorino R. Editorial Comment to Performance comparisons in major uro-oncological surgeries between the USA and Japan. Int J Urol 2014; 21:1150. [PMID: 25039618 DOI: 10.1111/iju.12574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C Mir
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|