1
|
Roberts HN, Solomon B, Harden S, Lingaratnam S, Alexander M. Utility of 30-Day Mortality Following Systemic Anti-Cancer Treatment as a Quality Indicator in Advanced Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2024; 25:e211-e220.e1. [PMID: 38772809 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 30-day mortality after systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) has been suggested as a quality indicator primarily for measuring use of chemotherapy towards the end of life. Utility across different cancer types is unclear, especially when using immunotherapy and targeted therapies. METHODS This retrospective study included patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer who received palliative-intent SACT at an Australian metropolitan cancer center between 2015 and 2022. Using a prospectively maintained lung cancer database, patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were evaluated against annual 30-day mortality rates following SACT. RESULTS 1072 patients were identified. Annual 30-day mortality rate after palliative-intent SACT for lung cancer ranged between 9% and 15%, with significant variance between treatment types. Calculated rates of 30-day mortality are higher if longer reporting time periods are used. Patients who died within 30 days of SACT were more likely to have received targeted therapies or immunotherapy as their final line of treatment, have a poorer performance status at diagnosis, and have received multiple lines of treatment. CONCLUSIONS Our data support differential interpretation of 30-day mortality for quality assurance, especially with regard to lung cancer. Consistency in population and reporting time periods, and accounting for treatment type is crucial if 30-day mortality is to be utilized as cancer care performance quality indicator. Relevance to quality care is questionable in the lung cancer setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Benjamin Solomon
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Susan Harden
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Senthil Lingaratnam
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Marliese Alexander
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne VIC 3052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Szilcz M, Wastesson JW, Calderón-Larrañaga A, Morin L, Lindman H, Johnell K. Endocrine treatment near the end of life among older women with metastatic breast cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1223563. [PMID: 37876970 PMCID: PMC10591323 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1223563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The appropriate time to discontinue chemotherapy at the end of life has been widely discussed. In contrast, few studies have investigated the patterns of endocrine treatment near death. In this study, we aimed to investigate the end-of-life endocrine treatment patterns of older women with metastatic breast cancer and explore characteristics associated with treatment. Methods A retrospective cohort study of all older women (age ≥65 years) with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who died in Sweden, 2016 - 2020. We used routinely collected administrative and health data with national coverage. Treatment initiation was defined as dispensing during the last three months of life with a nine-month washout period, while continuation and discontinuation were assessed by previous use during the same period. We used log-binomial models to explore factors associated with the continuation and initiation of endocrine treatments. Results We included 3098 deceased older women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (median age 78). Overall, endocrine treatment was continued by 39% and initiated by 5% and of women during their last three months of life, while 31% discontinued and 24% did not use endocrine treatment during their last year of life. Endocrine treatment continuation was more likely among older and less educated women, and among women who had multi-dose drug dispensing, chemotherapy, and CDK4/6 use. Only treatment-related factors were associated with treatment initiation. Conclusion More than a third of women with metastatic breast cancer continue endocrine treatments potentially past the point of benefit, whereas late initiation is less frequent. Further research is warranted to determine whether our results reflect overtreatment at the end of life once patients' preferences and survival prognosis are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Máté Szilcz
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jonas W. Wastesson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Aging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga
- Aging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholm Gerontology Research Center, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lucas Morin
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Inserm CIC 1431, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France
- Inserm U1018, High-Dimensional Biostatistics for Drug Safety and Genomics, CESP, Villejuif, France
| | - Henrik Lindman
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Experimental and Clinical Oncology; Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Kristina Johnell
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Geyer T, Le NS, Groissenberger I, Jutz F, Tschurlovich L, Kreye G. Systemic Anticancer Treatment Near the End of Life: a Narrative Literature Review. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:1328-1350. [PMID: 37501037 PMCID: PMC10547806 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01115-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) includes different treatment modalities that can be effective in treating cancer. However, in the case of disease progression, cancers might become incurable and SACT might reach its limits. In the case of incurable cancers, SACT is often given in a palliative setting, with the goal of improving the patients' quality of life (QOL) and their survival. In contrast, especially for patients who approach end of life (EOL), such treatments might do more harm than good. Patients receiving EOL anticancer treatments often experience belated palliative care referrals. The use of systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and poor prognosis approaching the EOL has been associated with significant toxicity and worse QOL compared to best supportive care. Therefore, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has discouraged this practice, and it is considered a metric of low-value care by Choosing Wisely (Schnipper et al. in J Clin Oncol 4;30(14):1715-24). Recommendations of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) suggest that especially chemotherapy and immunotherapy should be avoided in the last few weeks of the patients' lives. In this narrative review, we screened the current literature for the impact of SACT and factors predicting the use of SACT near the EOL with discussion on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Geyer
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - Nguyen-Son Le
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine 2, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, University Hospital of Krems, Mitterweg 10, 3500 Krems an Der Donau, Austria
| | - Iris Groissenberger
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - Franziska Jutz
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - Lisa Tschurlovich
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria
| | - Gudrun Kreye
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems an der Donau, Austria
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine 2, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, University Hospital of Krems, Mitterweg 10, 3500 Krems an Der Donau, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zimbwa B, Gilbar PJ, Davis MR, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S. Retrospective analysis of mortality within 30 days of systemic anticancer therapy and comparison with a previous audit at an Australian Regional Cancer Centre. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2021:10781552211016086. [PMID: 33990165 DOI: 10.1177/10781552211016086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To retrospectively determine the rate of death occurring within 14 and 30 days of systemic anticancer therapy (SACT), compare this against a previous audit and benchmark results against other cancer centres. Secondly, to determine if the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), not available at the time of the initial audit, impacted mortality rates. METHOD All adult solid tumour and haematology patients receiving SACT at an Australian Regional Cancer Centre (RCC) between January 2016 and July 2020 were included. RESULTS Over a 55-month period, 1709 patients received SACT. Patients dying within 14 and 30 days of SACT were 3.3% and 7.0% respectively and is slightly higher than our previous study which was 1.89% and 5.6%. Mean time to death was 15.5 days. Males accounted for 63.9% of patients and the mean age was 66.8 years. 46.2% of the 119 patients dying in the 30 days post SACT started a new line of treatment during that time. Of 98 patients receiving ICI, 22.5% died within 30 days of commencement. Disease progression was the most common cause of death (79%). The most common place of death was the RCC (38.7%). CONCLUSION The rate of death observed in our re-audit compares favourably with our previous audit and is still at the lower end of that seen in published studies in Australia and internationally. Cases of patients dying within 30 days of SACT should be regularly reviewed to maintain awareness of this benchmark of quality assurance and provide a feedback process for clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter J Gilbar
- Cancer Care Services, Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba, Australia.,Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland Toowoomba, Toowoomba, Australia
| | - Mark R Davis
- Cancer Care Services, Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nguyen M, Ng Ying Kin S, Shum E, Wann A, Tamjid B, Sahu A, Torres J. Anticancer therapy within the last 30 days of life: results of an audit and re-audit cycle from an Australian regional cancer centre. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19:14. [PMID: 31987038 PMCID: PMC6986019 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-0517-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The therapeutic landscape in medical oncology continues to expand significantly. Newer therapies, especially immunotherapy, offer the hope of profound and durable responses with more tolerable side effect profiles. Integrating this information into the decision making process is challenging for patients and oncologists. Systemic anticancer treatment within the last thirty days of life is a key quality of care indicator and is one parameter used in the assessment of aggressiveness of care. METHODS A retrospective review of medical records of all patients previously treated at Goulburn Valley Health oncology department who died between 1 January 2015 and 30 June 2018 was conducted. Information collected related to patient demographics, diagnosis, treatment, and hospital care within the last 30 days of life. These results were presented to the cancer services meeting and a quality improvement intervention program was instituted. A second retrospective review of medical records of all patients who died between 1 July 2018 and 31 December 2018 was conducted in order to measure the effect of this intervention. RESULTS The initial audit period comprised 440 patients. 120 patients (27%) received treatment within the last 30 days of life. The re-audit period comprised 75 patients. 19 patients (25%) received treatment within the last 30 days of life. Treatment rates of chemotherapy reduced after the intervention in contrast to treatment rates of immunotherapy which increased. A separate analysis calculated the rate of mortality within 30 days of chemotherapy from the total number of patients who received chemotherapy was initially 8% and 2% in the re-audit period. Treatment within the last 30 days of life was associated with higher use of aggressive care such as emergency department presentation, hospitalisation, ICU admission and late hospice referral. Palliative care referral rates improved after the intervention. CONCLUSION This audit demonstrated that a quality improvement intervention can impact quality of care indicators with reductions in the use of chemotherapy within the last 30 days of life. However, immunotherapy use increased which may be explained by increased access and a better risk benefit balance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Evonne Shum
- Goulburn Valley Health, Shepparton, Australia
| | | | | | - Arvind Sahu
- Goulburn Valley Health, Shepparton, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|