The impact of pre-treatment smoking status on survival after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Smoking is a risk factor for the development of lung cancer and reduces life expectancy within the general population. Retrospective studies suggest that non-smokers have better outcomes after treatment for lung cancer. We used a prospective database to investigate relationships between pre-treatment smoking status and survival for a cohort of patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with curative-intent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

All patients treated with CRT for stage III NSCLC at a major metropolitan cancer centre were prospectively registered to a database. A detailed smoking history was routinely obtained at baseline. Kaplan-Meier statistics were used to assess overall survival and progression-free survival in never versus former versus current smokers.

RESULTS

Median overall survival for 265 eligible patients was 2.21 years (95 % Confidence Interval 1.78, 2.84). It was 5.5 years (95 % CI 2.1, not reached) for 25 never-smokers versus 1.9 years (95 % CI 1.5, 2.7) for 182 former smokers and 2.2 years (95 % CI 1.3, 2.7) for 58 current smokers. Hazard ratio for death was 2.43 (95 % CI 1.32-4.50) for former smokers and 2.75 (95 % CI 1.40, 5.40) for current smokers, p = 0.006. Actionable tumour mutations (EGFR, ALK, ROS1) were present in more never smokers (14/25) than former (9/182) or current (3/58) smokers. TKI use was also higher in never smokers but this was not significantly associated with superior survival (Hazard ratio 0.71, 95 % CI 0.41, 1.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Never smokers have substantially better overall survival than former or current smokers after undergoing CRT for NSCLC.

GrassGroTM simulation of pasture, animal performance and greenhouse emissions on low and high sheep productivity grazing systems: 1-year validation and 25-year analysis

Globally, there is a focus on reducing the absolute methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide emissions, and the emissions intensity (EI, kg CO2e/kg animal product) of livestock production. Increasing the productivity of mixed pasture systems has the potential to increase food (e.g., lamb) and textile fibre (e.g., wool) production while reducing the EI of those products from grazing livestock. The objective of this study was to quantify the differences in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and EI between sheep on Low (i.e., low sustainable stocking rate) and High (i.e., high sustainable stocking rate) productivity grazing systems (PGSs). Therefore, a replicated breeding-ewe trial on 18 paddocks was established across 2 - years. Three flocks on Low (3 × 16 ewes/flock) and High PGSs (3 × 32 ewes/flock) rotated across three land-classes and three paddocks per PGS. In year 1, the observed on-farm pasture quantity, quality, and botanical composition, together with lamb BW (kg), and daily CH4 production (DMP, g CH4/head per day) using Open Path Fourier Transformed Infrared (OP-FTIR) spectrometers data were measured. Subsequently, two simulations using GrassGroTM were conducted: (1) a 1-year GrassGroTM simulation that used the observed on-farm data to adjust parameters: date of mating, paddock fertility, and weight of mature ewes to validate GrassGroTM predictions to achieve accuracy and precision targets; and (2) a 25-year (1986-2011) simulation to analyse the effects of Low and High PGSs on sheep production and GHG emissions across a variable climate. The 1-year validation predictions fitted well with the observed on-farm data for: pasture biomass (kg/ha), DM digestibility (%), botanical composition (kg/ha), lamb (kg) product, and DMP (g CH4/head per day). The subsequent predicted results from the 25-year GrassGroTM simulation showed minimal effect of PGS on the mean DM intake (kg DM/day) or DMP for Low and High PGSs, but this was thought to be due to the biomass in both PGSs exceeding 1 500 kg DM/ha. The EI, over the 25-year simulation, on the High PGS was 16.5% lower than the Low PGS. Additional calculations of DMP were conducted using a recent global equation, giving estimates of DMP that closely matched the observed on-farm OP-FTIR DMP measurements, but these were lower than the GrassGroTM predictions and improved the accuracy and precision. It is concluded that in some pasture situations, managing pastures and stock numbers to intensify grazing systems can allow increased livestock production, without increasing daily CH4 emissions/head while substantially decreasing the EI of the animal products generated.

First-line chemoimmunotherapy and immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases: a registry study

Introduction

Brain metastases commonly occur in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Standard first-line treatment for NSCLC, without an EGFR, ALK or ROS1 mutation, is either chemoimmunotherapy or anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Traditionally, patients with symptomatic or untreated brain metastases were excluded from the pivotal clinical trials that established first-line treatment recommendations. The intracranial effectiveness of these treatment protocols has only recently been elucidated in small-scale prospective trials.

Methods

Patients with NSCLC and brain metastases, treated with first-line chemoimmunotherapy or anti-PD-1 monotherapy were selected from the Australian Registry and biObank of thoracic cancers (AURORA) clinical database covering seven institutions. The primary outcome was a composite time-to-event (TTE) outcome, including extracranial and intracranial progression, death, or need for local intracranial therapy, which served as a surrogate for disease progression. The secondary outcome included overall survival (OS), intracranial objective response rate (iORR) and objective response rate (ORR).

Results

116 patients were included. 63% received combination chemoimmunotherapy and 37% received anti-PD-1 monotherapy. 69% of patients received upfront local therapy either with surgery, radiotherapy or both. The median TTE was 7.1 months (95% CI 5 - 9) with extracranial progression being the most common progression event. Neither type of systemic therapy or upfront local therapy were predictive of TTE in a multivariate analysis. The median OS was 17 months (95% CI 13-27). Treatment with chemoimmunotherapy was predictive of longer OS in multivariate analysis (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.14 - 0.86; p=0.01). The iORR was 46.6%. The iORR was higher in patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy compared to immunotherapy (58% versus 31%, p=0.01). The use of chemoimmunotherapy being predictive of iORR in a multivariate analysis (OR 2.88; 95% CI 1.68 - 9.98; p=0.04).

Conclusion

The results of this study of real-world data demonstrate the promising intracranial efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy in the first-line setting, potentially surpassing that of immunotherapy alone. No demonstrable difference in survival or TTE was seen between receipt of upfront local therapy. Prospective studies are required to assist clinical decision making regarding optimal sequencing of local and systemic therapies.

Quality of Decision Making in Radiation Oncology

High-quality decision making in radiation oncology requires the careful consideration of multiple factors. In addition to the evidence-based indications for curative or palliative radiotherapy, this article explores how, in routine clinical practice, we also need to account for many other factors when making high-quality decisions. Foremost are patient-related factors, including preference, and the complex interplay between age, frailty and comorbidities, especially with an ageing cancer population. Whilst clinical practice guidelines inform our decisions, we need to account for their applicability in different patient groups and different resource settings. With particular reference to curative-intent radiotherapy, we explore decisions regarding dose fractionation schedules, use of newer radiotherapy technologies and multimodality treatment considerations that contribute to personalised patient-centred care.

Patterns of care for people with small cell lung cancer in Victoria, 2011-19: a retrospective, population-based registry data study

OBJECTIVES

To report stage-specific patterns of treatment and the influence of management and treatment type on survival rates for people newly diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional patterns of care study; analysis of data prospectively collected for the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry (VLCR).

SETTING, PARTICIPANTS

All people diagnosed with SCLC in Victoria during 1 April 2011 - 18 December 2019.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Stage-specific management and treatment of people with SCLC; median survival time.

RESULTS

During 2011-19, 1006 people were diagnosed with SCLC (10.5% of all lung cancer diagnoses in Victoria); their median age was 69 years (interquartile range [IQR], 62-77 years), 429 were women (43%), and 921 were current or former smokers (92%). Clinical stage was defined for 896 people (89%; TNM stages I-III, 268 [30%]; TNM stage IV, 628 [70%]) and ECOG performance status at diagnosis for 663 (66%; 0 or 1, 489 [49%]; 2-4, 174 [17%]). The cases of 552 patients had been discussed at multidisciplinary meetings (55%), 377 people had received supportive care screening (37%), and 388 had been referred for palliative care (39%). Active treatment was received by 891 people (89%): chemotherapy, 843 (84%); radiotherapy, 460 (46%); chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 419 (42%); surgery, 23 (2%). Treatment had commenced within fourteen days of diagnosis for 632 of 875 patients (72%). Overall median survival time from diagnosis was 8.9 months (IQR, 4.2-16 months; stage I-III: 16.3 [IQR, 9.3-30] months; stage IV: 7.2 [IQR, 3.3-12] months). Multidisciplinary meeting presentation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.77), multimodality treatment (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.36-0.49), and chemotherapy within fourteen days of diagnosis (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48-0.94) were each associated with lower mortality during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Rates of supportive care screening, multidisciplinary meeting evaluation, and palliative care referral for people with SCLC could be improved. A national registry of SCLC-specific management and outcomes data could improve the quality and safety of care.

Development of an Australia and New Zealand Lung Cancer Clinical Quality Registry: a protocol paper

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality, comprising the largest national cancer disease burden in Australia and New Zealand. Regional reports identify substantial evidence-practice gaps, unwarranted variation from best practice, and variation in processes and outcomes of care between treating centres. The Australia and New Zealand Lung Cancer Registry (ANZLCR) will be developed as a Clinical Quality Registry to monitor the safety, quality and effectiveness of lung cancer care in Australia and New Zealand.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Patient participants will include all adults >18 years of age with a new diagnosis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), SCLC, thymoma or mesothelioma. The ANZLCR will register confirmed diagnoses using opt-out consent. Data will address key patient, disease, management processes and outcomes reported as clinical quality indicators. Electronic data collection facilitated by local data collectors and local, state and federal data linkage will enhance completeness and accuracy. Data will be stored and maintained in a secure web-based data platform overseen by registry management. Central governance with binational representation from consumers, patients and carers, governance, administration, health department, health policy bodies, university research and healthcare workers will provide project oversight.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The ANZLCR has received national ethics approval under the National Mutual Acceptance scheme. Data will be routinely reported to participating sites describing performance against measures of agreed best practice and nationally to stakeholders including federal, state and territory departments of health. Local, regional and (bi)national benchmarks, augmented with online dashboard indicator reporting will enable local targeting of quality improvement efforts.

O-302 Lower expression of AHCY is associated with increased miscarriage risk

Study question

Are alterations in the transcript levels of genes from the methionine cycle associated with maternal associated miscarriage risk?

Summary answer

Lower expression of AHCY is associated with a greater number of prior pregnancy losses

What is known already

Around 15% of pregnancies end in miscarriage, and the risk of recurrence increases with each pregnancy loss. Aberrant differentiation (decidualization) of endometrial stromal cells into specialised decidual cells to accommodate implantation is a key maternal factor for miscarriage risk.

Our previous work identified secretory changes in cysteine and methionine metabolites upon decidualization. The methionine cycle contributes to vital cellular functions, including producing methionine for proliferation, regulating cell differentiation, and S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) production. SAM is required for protein, RNA and DNA methylation, thereby influencing pathways at the metabolic, epigenetic, and proteomic levels. AHCY clears S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), reducing its inhibition of methylation.

Study design, size, duration

Endometrial biopsies (n = 250) were collected during the luteal phase (LH + 6-11). Patients were grouped based on their miscarriage history. Accordingly, expression of genes from the methionine cycle were quantified using RT-qPCR.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

Endometrial biopsies were obtained, with written informed consent, from women attending the Implantation Clinic at University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, following transvaginal ultrasounds to exclude uterine pathology. Isolated RNA was converted into cDNA. Expression of AHCY, AMD1, BHMT2, CBS, MAT2A, MAT2B, and MTR were normalised to L19. Statistical analysis was performed in Graphpad Prism; with significance accepted at p < 0.05. AHCY was silenced in an endometrial cell line to determine its effect on decidualization.

Main results and the role of chance

This study reports a distinct reduction in expression of methionine cycle genes (MAT2A, AHCY, AMD1, MTR, BHMT2) in the late-luteal phase of the cycle consistent with a reduction in proliferation.

By plotting percentile graphs based on the statistical distribution in gene expression for each day of the luteal phase, comparisons have been made between groups.

AHCY expression is significantly reduced in patients with increasing number of prior miscarriages, particularly between 0-2 and 5+ previous miscarriages (p = 0.0334). Neither patient age nor BMI are a factor in this reduced expression.

In contrast, there is a stromal specific increase in AHCY upon decidualization in vitro, suggesting it is required in the decidua. Silencing AHCY in an endometrial cell line significantly reduces PRL expression upon decidualization. Reduction in AHCY may lead to a decreased “methylation potential” as SAH cannot be cleared. SAH accumulation inhibits methylation, and limits SAM production, thus compounding its effect.

Decreased methylation potential could prevent differentiation of the stromal compartment, resulting in lower levels of PRL, and altering decidual timing. Therefore, an embryo may implant into a tissue primed for disintegration, resulting a miscarriage.

In summary, AHCY may contribute to aberrant decidualization augmenting the risk of miscarriage.

Limitations, reasons for caution

Results are based on endometrial biopsies from an implantation clinic, therefore studies into biopsies from women with normal reproductive histories should also be analysed. Further functional studies are needed to ascertain the mechanism of action of AHCY in miscarriage.

Wider implications of the findings

This study identified that a decrease in AHCY in whole endometrial tissue is associated with increased risk of miscarriage. Further, silencing AHCY perturbed decidual marker expression. Thus, AHCY may act as a biomarker for atypical decidualization, and the clearance of SAH may be a potential treatment.

Trial registration number

N/A

Characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients with reduced ejection fraction referred for adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Adenosine stress perfusion has been shown to be of minimal incremental benefit in distinguishing between ischaemic and non-ischaemic aetiology of severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) over and above that obtained from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) with Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE). Stress CMR has, however, been shown to be effective in risk-stratifying LVSD patients, with ischaemia being an independent predictor of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (MI) and associated with higher rates of further intervention.

Purpose

Evaluate real world data from a single tertiary UK cardiac MRI centre to determine the characteristics and long-term clinical outcomes of patients with LVSD referred for stress CMR. 

Methods

As part of an ongoing registry, all consenting patients with Ejection Fraction (EF) ≤40% and a completed adenosine stress perfusion CMR between January 2015 and December 2019 were included with prospective baseline data collection. All-cause mortality and cardiac hospitalisation, coronary angiography/revascularisation was determined from electronic hospital records. Outcomes were compared between the inducible ischaemia vs. no ischaemia groups, and LGE present vs. no LGE groups using chi square. 

Results

The sample included 86 patients. The mean EF was 32 ± 6%. Median follow up was 3.8 years (range 41-2222 days). The indications for CMR were: 30 (35%) assess ischaemia, 35 (41%) assess LVSD aetiology and 21 (24%) LVSD assess viability. 

Inducible ischemia was present in 30 (35%) patients and absent in 56 (65%).  Patient characteristics and outcomes are shown in Table 1. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups but there was a higher rate of hypertension and ischaemic heart disease in the ischaemia group. There was a non-significant difference in combined mortality and cardiac hospitalisation rates between the groups (40% vs. 27% p = 0.20). 

LGE was present in 69 (80%) patients (28 with ischaemia; 41 without) and absent in 17 (20%, 2 with ischaemia, 15 without). The event rate was 23 (33%) vs. 4 (24%) between LGE vs. No LGE groups (p = 0.44). Of the 15 patients (17%) with no LGE or ischaemia; 2 died and 1 was hospitalised, there were no MI"s and no Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI).

The lack of statistical difference in event rates between ischaemia and no ischaemia groups may be due to our relatively small sample size or could reflect the effectiveness of contemporary disease modifying treatment for Heart Failure with reduced EF.

Conclusion

This real-world data supports published findings that in patients with LVSD and no LGE on CMR, ischaemia is very uncommon and stress CMR is unlikely to increase diagnostic yield. Conversely, if stress CMR is performed and ischaemia is absent, incidence of subsequent angiography and revascularisation is very low, which is reassuring in clinical practice.  In those patients without ischaemia and LGE, likelihood of MI is low.

Residual ctDNA after treatment predicts early relapse in patients with early-stage NSCLC

8517

Background: Liquid biopsies based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis are being investigated for detection of residual disease and recurrence. Conclusive evidence for utility of ctDNA in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is awaited. Due to low ctDNA levels in early-stage disease or post-treatment, effective methods require high analytical sensitivity to detect mutant allele fractions (MAF) below 0.01%. Methods: We analysed 363 plasma samples from 88 patients with NSCLC recruited to the LUng cancer CIrculating tumour DNA (LUCID) study, with disease stage I (49%), II (28%) and III (23%). 62% were adenocarcinomas. Plasma was collected before and after treatment, and at 3, 6 and 9 months after surgery (N = 69) or chemoradiotherapy (N = 19). Additional plasma was collected at disease relapse for 17 patients. Median follow-up was 3 years, and 40 patients progressed or died of any cause. We employed the RaDaR™ assay, a highly sensitive personalized assay using deep sequencing of up to 48 tumor-specific variants. Variants identified by tumor exome analysis were tested by deep sequencing of tumor tissue and buffy coat DNA to verify somatic mutations and exclude clonal hematopoiesis. The RaDaR assay demonstrated 90% sensitivity at 0.001% MAF in analytical validation studies. Results: ctDNA was detected in 26% of samples, at median MAF of 0.047% (range: 0.0007% to > 2%), and prior to treatment in 87%, 77% and 24% for disease stage III, II and I respectively. For 62 patients, plasma was collected at a landmark timepoint, between 2 weeks and 4 months after initial treatment. ctDNA detection at the landmark timepoint was strongly predictive of clinical disease relapse, with Hazard Ratio of 20.7 (CI: 7.7-55.5, p-value < 0.0001). All 11 cases with ctDNA detected at landmark had disease progression, a median of 121 days after detection, and these included all 8 patients that relapsed within 300 days of treatment. Across 27 patients whose disease progressed during the study, ctDNA was detected at any timepoint post-treatment in 17 cases, with a median lead time of 203 days, and up to 741 days prior to clinical progression. ctDNA was detected post-treatment, in 13 of the 15 patients that progressed and had ctDNA detected prior to treatment. Conclusions: Our results support an emerging paradigm shift, by demonstrating that liquid biopsies can reliably detect recurrence of NSCLC at a preclinical stage, many months before clinical progression, thereby offering the opportunity for earlier therapeutic intervention. Clinical trial information: NCT04153526.

Age-related treatment patterns for stage I NSCLC in three European countries

INTRODUCTION

Surgery is the preferred treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) while stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may be applied in patients with major comorbidity or high age. We evaluated the association between age and treatment utilization for early-stage NSCLC in patients diagnosed in 2015-2016 in three European countries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Information was retrieved from population-based registries in England, Norway and the Netherlands. Treatment patterns and two-year overall survival rates for 105,124 patients with clinical stage I were analysed by age-group.

RESULTS

Surgical resection rates were higher in Norway (55%) and England (53%) than in the Netherlands (47%), and decreased with increasing age. SBRT use was highest in the Netherlands (41%), followed by Norway (29%) and England (12%). In the Netherlands, SBRT was the prevailing treatment in patients aged 70 years or older. In octogenarians, the proportion not receiving curative intent treatment was 53% in England, versus 35% in Norway and 22% in the Netherlands. Two-year survival rates were better for surgery than for SBRT and slightly better in Norway.

CONCLUSION

In patients aged 70 years or older, the proportion not receiving any curative treatment remains substantial, and differs significantly between countries. Measures to address these disparities are needed.

Accelerated implementation of remote reporting during the COVID-19 pandemic

AIM

To assess, via a survey of UK radiological departments, if the COVID-19 pandemic led to a change in radiological reporting undertaken in a home environment with appropriate IT support.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All imaging departments in the UK were contacted and asked about the provision of home reporting and IT support before and after the first wave of the pandemic.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-seven of the 217 departments contacted replied, producing a response rate of 61%. There was a 147% increase in the provision of remote access viewing and reporting platforms during the pandemic. Although 578 consultants had access to a viewing platform pre-pandemic, this had increased to 1,431 during the course of the first wave.

CONCLUSION

This survey represents work undertaken by UK NHS Trusts in co-ordinating and providing increased home-reporting facilities to UK radiologists during the first wave of this global pandemic. The impact of these facilities has been shown to allow more than just the provision of reporting of both elective and emergency imaging and provides additional flexibility in how UK radiologists can help support and provide services. This is a good start, but there are potential problems that now need to be overcome.

A national UK audit for diagnostic accuracy of preoperative CT chest in emergency and elective surgery during COVID-19 pandemic

AIM

To report on a snap audit of all departments in the UK as to the value of preoperative thoracic imaging, preferably computed tomography (CT), of patients undergoing any surgery to assess for changes consistent with COVID-19 preoperatively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All Imaging departments in the UK were contacted and asked to record the number of preoperative CT examinations performed in patients being considered for both emergency and elective surgical intervention over a 5-day period in May 2020.

RESULTS

Forty-seven percent of departments replied with data provided on >820 patients. Nineteen percent of additional preoperative CT was in patients undergoing elective intervention and 81% in patients presenting with surgical abdominal pain. There was a high rate of false positives in patients who tested negative for COVID-19, producing a sensitivity for thoracic CT of 68.4%.

CONCLUSION

This UK-wide audit demonstrates that a large number of additional thoracic imaging examinations over a 5-day period were performed with a low sensitivity for the identification of COVID-19 in this preoperative group of patients. Given these findings, it is difficult to justify this additional examination in this group of patients.

Abstract 735: Sensitive detection of ctDNA in early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients with a personalized sequencing assay

Introduction

Identification of minimal residual disease (MRD) following curative intervention of localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) holds promise for identifying patients who are at higher risk of relapse and who would benefit from adjuvant treatment. Current routine clinical practice involves serial radiographic imaging following surgery to detect macroscopic disease. Liquid biopsy can identify patients who have MRD without macroscopic disease. Currently available assays have only identified circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in a limited number of cases with early stage NSCLC. More sensitive methods are needed to accurately identify the majority of patients who will relapse. Here we evaluate the performance of InVision®MRD, a personalized sequencing assay for plasma cell-free DNA, for detection of ctDNA in patients with early-stage NSCLC undergoing treatment with curative intent.

Methods

InVision®MRD is a highly sensitive in vitro diagnostic assay, currently available for research use only (RUO), that can detect the presence of tumor DNA traces in cell-free DNA from plasma samples of cancer patients. InVision®MRD identifies tumor-specific variants from exome sequencing of tumor tissue and tracks them in plasma specimens by multiplex PCR and high-depth next-generation sequencing. We evaluated the detection of ctDNA in plasma samples collected from the LUng cancer - CIrculating tumor DNA (LUCID) study, which collected plasma samples from 100 patients with NSCLC stages I-III who underwent radical treatment with curative intent, either surgery or radiotherapy ± chemotherapy. Of patients in the LUCID study, 60% had stage I NSCLC and 40% patients had stage II/III disease, according to TNM 7th edition.

Results

To evaluate the InVision®MRD assay, a subset of samples from the LUCID study were analyzed. Samples were collected before and after surgery and chemo-radiotherapy from patients with early-stage NSCLC. Using multiplexed analysis of 48 patient-specific variants and high-depth sequencing, ctDNA was detected in 50% of pre-treatment samples analyzed from the first set of 18 patients, at ctDNA fractions ranging from 20 ppm (equivalent to 0.002%) to 19576 ppm (equivalent to 1.958%).

Conclusions

These findings highlight an opportunity to improve ctDNA detection for early stage NSCLC using a patient-specific plasma sequencing assay. Initial detection rates have reached 50% for patients with early-stage disease prior to treatment, including detection of ctDNA to levels as low as a few parts per million. Together with further data to be presented, this suggests a possible route to improving treatment for early stage NSCLC by detection of residual disease post treatment and for monitoring for early detection of relapse.

Citation Format: Katrin Heider, Davina Gale, Andrea Ruiz-Valdepenas, Giovanni Marsico, Garima Sharma, Malcolm Perry, Robert Osborne, Karen Howarth, Tadd Lazarus, Viona Rundell, Jelena Belic, Jerome Wulff, Susan Harden, Doris M. Rassl, Robert C. Rintoul, Nitzan Rosenfeld. Sensitive detection of ctDNA in early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients with a personalized sequencing assay [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 735.

Abstract 736: ctDNA detection in early stage non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction

Overall survival of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains poor as patients are frequently diagnosed at late stage. The evaluation of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been shown to offer a non-invasive method for cancer detection. However, detection rates of ctDNA in patients with early stage cancers have been low. The distribution of ctDNA levels in this population is unknown, and the analytical requirements for a test to detect the majority of cancers cannot be defined.

Methods

The LUCID study (LUng cancer - CIrculating tumour DNA study) recruited 100 patients with stage I-IIIB NSCLC according to the TNM 7th edition and collected plasma samples before and after radical treatment by surgery or radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy with curative intent. To measure levels of ctDNA in patients with early stage disease and very low tumor burden we developed a method for INtegration of VAriant Reads (INVAR), which uses sequencing data across hundreds to thousands of tumor-mutated loci to detect ctDNA in plasma samples at high sensitivity. We applied INVAR to 90 of the patients from the LUCID study, where tumor sequencing data was available. To measure ctDNA in the remaining LUCID patients, we applied the InVision® amplicon-based plasma sequencing assay.

Results

Across the 100 patients, ctDNA signals were observed in 67% of samples obtained prior to treatment. ctDNA was detected in 66% of cases, with ctDNA levels as low as 9.1x10-6 (9 parts per million), at a detection threshold with 95% specificity. ctDNA was detected in 52% of 60 patients with stage I NSCLC and in 88% of 40 patients with stage II/III disease. Analyzing different histological subtypes, ctDNA was detected in 79% of squamous cell carcinomas and 60% of adenocarcinomas. We found a good agreement when comparing the ctDNA results obtained from INVAR and the InVision® assay.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that an assay with sensitivity to below 10 parts per million may be able to detect ctDNA in as many as 2/3 of patients with early stage NSCLC prior to treatment, including the majority of adenocarcinoma cases. Additionally, patient-specific analysis of ctDNA has the potential to aid in longitudinal cancer monitoring and in detection of low tumor burden and minimal residual disease. We aim to apply this approach to serial samples obtained through the LUCID study to investigate its application in treatment management.

Citation Format: Katrin Heider, Jonathan C. Wan, Davina Gale, Andrea Ruiz-Valdepenas, Florent Mouliere, James Morris, Nagmi R. Qureshi, Wendi Qian, Jerome Wulff, Nikolaos Demiris, Karen Howarth, Emma Green, Viona Rundell, Tim Eisen, Wendy Cooper, Christopher G. Smith, Charles Massie, Susan Harden, Doris M. Rassl, Robert C. Rintoul, Nitzan Rosenfeld. ctDNA detection in early stage non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 736.

Detection of residual disease and recurrence in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using sensitive personalized ctDNA sequencing assays

e15560

Background: Detection of residual circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in patient plasma following curative intervention for localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) could identify patients who are at higher risk of relapse. These patients may benefit from adjuvant treatment, even if they have no macroscopic disease identified by radiographic imaging, which is the current standard of care. Here we evaluate the performance of the Inivata personalized sequencing assays to detect ctDNA in a cohort of 90 patients with early-stage NSCLC undergoing treatment with curative intent. Methods: The Inivata assay uses a highly sensitive next-generation sequencing platform, to identify tumor-specific variants from exome sequencing of tumor tissue and to track up to 48 patient-specific mutations in plasma specimens by multiplex PCR and ultra-high-depth next-generation sequencing. Samples from 90 patients with Stage I-III NSCLC who underwent radical treatment with curative intent, either surgery or radiotherapy ± chemotherapy, were collected as part of the LUng cancer - CIrculating tumor DNA (LUCID) study. Results: 350 plasma samples from 90 patients were analyzed using the Inivata assay, including samples collected before and after treatment and at subsequent follow-up visits. ctDNA was detected in pre-treatment samples in 38% of 32 patients (12/32) with Stage I NSCLC and in 90% of 21 patients (19/21) with Stage II/III disease, at allele fractions ranging from 6 parts per million (ppm, equivalent to 0.0006%) to over 20,000 ppm (equivalent to 2%). In plasma samples collected post-treatment, ctDNA was detected in close to 50% of cases. Conclusions: These findings highlight the Inivata assay is a sensitive method for detection of residual ctDNA and recurrence in early stage NSCLC. Initial detection rates ranged from 38% in Stage I disease to 90% for patients with Stage II/III disease prior to treatment, including detection of ctDNA to levels as low as a few parts per million. ctDNA was detected in at least one post-treatment timepoint in close to 50% patients. Together with additional data to be presented from the full 90 patient cohort, this suggests a possible route to improving treatment and designs of adjuvant trials for early stage NSCLC by detection of residual disease post-treatment and monitoring for early detection of relapse.

Post-treatment survival difference between lobectomy and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in stage I non-small cell lung cancer in England

BACKGROUND

Approximately 15%-20% of all non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases present with stage I disease. Surgical resection traditionally offers the best chance of a cure but some patients will not have this treatment due to older age, comorbidities or personal choice. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has become an established curative intent treatment option for patients who are not selected for or do not choose surgery. The aim of this study is to compare survival at 90 days, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years for patients who received either lobectomy or SABR.

METHODS

We used data from the 2015 National Lung Cancer Audit database and linked with Hospital Episode Statistics and the radiotherapy dataset to identify patients with NSCLC stage IA-IB and performance status (PS) 0-2 who underwent surgery or SABR treatment. We assessed the likelihood of death at 90 days, 6 months, 1 year and 2 year after diagnosis and procedure date to observe survival between two patient groups.

RESULTS

We identified 2373 patients in our cohort, 476 of whom had SABR. The median difference between date of diagnosis and date of treatment for surgery patients was 17 days while for SABR patients it was 73 days. Increasing age and worsening PS were associated with having SABR rather than surgery. Survival between the two treatment modalities was similar early on but by 1-year people who had surgery did better than those who had SABR (adjusted ORs 2.12, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.31). This difference persisted at 2 years and when the analysis was restricted to patients aged <80 years and with PS 0 or 1 and stage IA only.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis suggests that patients who have lobectomy have a better survival compared with SABR patients; however, we found considerable delays in patients receiving SABR which may contribute to poorer long-term outcomes with this treatment option. Reducing these delays should be a key focus in development and reorganisation of services.

Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy Versus Radical Radiotherapy: Comparing Real-World Outcomes in Stage I Lung Cancer

AIMS

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is now considered the standard of care for medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The English National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) collects data on all patients diagnosed with lung cancer, including information on treatment. We wanted to compare outcomes for patients with stage I NSCLC treated with radical radiotherapy with either SABR or fractionated radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients diagnosed with stage I NSCLC in 2015 and 2016 were identified from the NCRAS dataset, validated by the National Lung Cancer Audit, and their treatment data were collated. For patients who received radiotherapy, those receiving radical dose fractionations, including SABR, were identified through linkage to the national Radiotherapy Dataset. Clinical outcomes for those receiving SABR or more fractionated radical radiotherapy were compared using univariate and fully adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

In total, 12 384 patients with stage I NSCLC were identified during the study period; 53.5% underwent surgical resection, 24.3% received no documented treatment, 18.6% received radical radiotherapy and 3.5% received other non-curative-intent treatments. For those receiving radical radiotherapy, 69% received SABR and 31% received fractionated treatment. The hazard ratio of death for the 1587 patients who received SABR was 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.61-0.79) compared with 717 patients who received radical fractionated radiotherapy; this benefit was seen for both stage Ia and stage Ib disease. The median overall survival was also longer for SABR versus radical radiotherapy (715 days versus 648 days). Exploratory travel time analysis shows that compared with stage I NSCLC patients receiving SABR, those receiving fractionated radiotherapy and those receiving no active treatment would have to travel longer and further to reach their nearest radiotherapy SABR centre.

CONCLUSION

This study adds to the data that SABR has a survival benefit when compared with fractionated radical radiotherapy. Although the use of SABR increased in England over this study period, it has still not reached levels of use seen in other countries. This study also highlights that one quarter of stage I NSCLC patients overall received no active treatment.

Abstract 1377: Improved ctDNA detection in early stage non-small-cell lung cancer

Overall survival of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains poor as patients are frequently diagnosed at a late stage. The evaluation of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has been shown to offer a non-invasive method for detection of cancer. However, detection rates of ctDNA in patients with early stage cancers, including NSCLC, have been limited due to sampling and sensitivity issues. We developed a novel algorithm for INtegration of VAriant Reads (INVAR), which uses sequencing data across hundreds to thousands of tumour-mutated loci to detect ctDNA in plasma samples at high sensitivity. We applied this to a cohort of stage I-III NSCLC patients recruited in the LUCID study. LUCID is a prospective and observational study of 100 stage I-IIIB NSCLC who are planning to undergo radical treatment (surgery or radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy) with curative intent. Plasma samples were collected before and after treatment with curative intent. We analysed a total of 50 patients using patient specific-sequencing panels and detected ctDNA in 78% of cases before treatment, at ctDNA fractions as low as 1.7x10-5. For 17 of those patients staging information was available. Here, we detected ctDNA in 50% of stage I patients (split evenly between stages IA and B) and 100% of stage II and III patients. We also applied INVAR to whole exome and shallow whole genome sequencing data from plasma samples, and showed that this algorithm can be used to detect low ctDNA fractions in such data. Our findings highlight an opportunity to improve ctDNA detection in early stage NSCLC by using patient specific sequencing information. Additionally, our algorithm has the potential to aid in longitudinal cancer monitoring and is applicable to a variety of sequencing data types. We aim to apply this approach to serial samples obtained through the LUCID study to investigate its application in the treatment management.

Citation Format: Katrin Heider, Jonathan C. Wan, Davina Gale, Florent C. Mouliere, Wendi Qian, Angels Kateb, Gail Doughton, Nicola Ramenatte, Ruth Tysoe, Christopher G. Smith, Doris M. Rassl, Susan Harden, Robert C. Rintoul, Charles Massie, Nitzan Rosenfeld. Improved ctDNA detection in early stage non-small-cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1377.

18F-Fludeoxyglucose PET/CT in SCLC: Analysis of the CONVERT Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

We used phase-3 CONVERT trial data to investigate the impact of fludeoxyglucose F 18 (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in SCLC.

METHODS

CONVERT randomized patients with limited-stage SCLC to twice-daily (45 Gy in 30 fractions) or once-daily (66 Gy in 33 fractions) chemoradiotherapy. Patients were divided into two groups in this unplanned analysis: those staged with conventional imaging (contrast-enhanced thorax and abdomen CT and brain imaging with or without bone scintigraphy) and those staged with 18F-FDG PET/CT in addition.

RESULTS

Data on a total of 540 patients were analyzed. Compared with patients who underwent conventional imaging (n = 231), patients also staged with 18F-FDG PET/CT (n = 309) had a smaller gross tumor volume (p = 0.003), were less likely to have an increased pretreatment serum lactate dehydrogenase level (p = 0.035), and received more chemotherapy (p = 0.026). There were no significant differences in overall (hazard ratio = 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-1.08, p = 0.192) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.71-1.07], p = 0.198) between patients staged with or without 18F-FDG PET/CT. In the conventional imaging group, we found no survival difference between patients staged with or without bone scintigraphy. Although there were no differences in delivered radiotherapy dose, 18F-FDG PET/CT-staged patients received lower normal tissue (lung, heart, and esophagus) radiation doses. Apart from a higher incidence of late esophagitis in patients staged with conventional imaging (for grade ≥1, 19% versus 11%; [p = 0.012]), the incidence of acute and late radiotherapy-related toxicities was not different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In CONVERT, survival outcomes were not significantly different in patients staged with or without 18F-FDG PET/CT. However, this analysis cannot support the use or omission of 18F-FDG PET/CT owing to study limitations.

Aspects of digestive function in sheep related to phenotypic variation in methane emissions

Ruminant livestock contribute to atmospheric methane (CH4) from enteric microbial fermentation of feed in the reticulo-rumen. Our research aimed to increase understanding of how digestive characteristics and rumen anatomy of the host animal contribute to variation in CH4 emissions between individual sheep. In total, 64 ewes were used in an incomplete block experiment with four experimental test periods (blocks). Ewes were chosen to represent the diversity of phenotypic variation in CH4 emissions: there were at least 10 offspring from each of four sires and a range of liveweights. Throughout the experiment, the ewes were fed equal parts of lucerne and oaten chaff, twice daily, at 1.5 times the maintenance requirements. Daily CH4 emission (g/day) increased significantly (P &lt; 0.001) with an increasing dry-matter intake (DMI) and reticulo-rumen volume (P &lt; 0.001). Lower methane yield (g CH4/kg DMI) was associated with shorter mean retention times of liquid (r = 0.59; P &lt; 0.05) and particle (r = 0.63; P &lt; 0.05) phases of the digesta in the rumen. Significant between sire variation was observed in CH4 emissions and in rumen volume (P = 0.02), the masses of liquids (P = 0.009) and particles (P &lt; 0.03) in the rumen and the proportion of gas in the dorsal sac of the rumen (P = 0.008). The best predictors of variation in CH4 emissions due to the host were DMI, CO2 emissions, rumen volume, liveweight, mean retention time of particles in the rumen, dorsal papillae density and the proportion of liquid in the contents of the rumen compartments.

Study protocol for the SARON trial: a multicentre, randomised controlled phase III trial comparing the addition of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and radical radiotherapy with standard chemotherapy alone for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Following growing evidence to support the safety, local control (LC) and potential improvement in overall survival (OS) in patients with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that have been treated with local ablative therapy such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), we initiate the SARON trial to investigate the impact and feasibility of adding SABR/SRS and radical radiotherapy (RRT) following standard chemotherapy on OS.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

SARON is a large, randomised controlled, multicentre, phase III trial for patients with oligometastatic EGFR, ALK and ROS1 mutation negative NSCLC (1-3 sites of synchronous metastatic disease, one of which must be extracranial). 340 patients will be recruited over 3 years from approximately 30 UK sites and randomised to receive either standard platinum-doublet chemotherapy only (control arm) or standard chemotherapy followed by RRT/SABR to their primary tumour and then SABR/SRS to all other metastatic sites (investigational arm). The primary endpoint is OS; the study is powered to detect an improvement in median survival from 9.9 months in the control arm to 14.3 months in the investigational arm with 85% power and two-sided 5% significance level. The secondary endpoints are LC, progression-free survival, new distant metastasis-free survival, toxicity and quality of life. An early feasibility review will take place after 50 randomised patients. Patients requiring both conventional thoracic RT to the primary and SABR to a thoracic metastasis will be included in a thoracic SABR safety substudy to assess toxicity and planning issues in this subgroup of patients more thoroughly.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

All participants are given a SARON patient information sheet and required to give written informed consent. Results will be submitted for presentation at local and international conferences and expected to be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02417662.

SPONSOR REFERENCE

UCL/13/0594.

Concurrent once-daily versus twice-daily chemoradiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (CONVERT): an open-label, phase 3, randomised, superiority trial

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer, but the optimal radiotherapy schedule and dose remains controversial. The aim of this study was to establish a standard chemoradiotherapy treatment regimen in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

The CONVERT trial was an open-label, phase 3, randomised superiority trial. We enrolled adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who had cytologically or histologically confirmed limited-stage small-cell lung cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and adequate pulmonary function. Patients were recruited from 73 centres in eight countries. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 45 Gy radiotherapy in 30 twice-daily fractions of 1·5 Gy over 19 days, or 66 Gy in 33 once-daily fractions of 2 Gy over 45 days, starting on day 22 after commencing cisplatin-etoposide chemotherapy (given as four to six cycles every 3 weeks in both groups). The allocation method used was minimisation with a random element, stratified by institution, planned number of chemotherapy cycles, and performance status. Treatment group assignments were not masked. The primary endpoint was overall survival, defined as time from randomisation until death from any cause, analysed by modified intention-to-treat. A 12% higher overall survival at 2 years in the once-daily group versus the twice-daily group was considered to be clinically significant to show superiority of the once-daily regimen. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00433563) and is currently in follow-up.

FINDINGS

Between April 7, 2008, and Nov 29, 2013, 547 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive twice-daily concurrent chemoradiotherapy (274 patients) or once-daily concurrent chemoradiotherapy (273 patients). Four patients (one in the twice-daily group and three in the once-daily group) did not return their case report forms and were lost to follow-up; these patients were not included in our analyses. At a median follow-up of 45 months (IQR 35-58), median overall survival was 30 months (95% CI 24-34) in the twice-daily group versus 25 months (21-31) in the once-daily group (hazard ratio for death in the once daily group 1·18 [95% CI 0·95-1·45]; p=0·14). 2-year overall survival was 56% (95% CI 50-62) in the twice-daily group and 51% (45-57) in the once-daily group (absolute difference between the treatment groups 5·3% [95% CI -3·2% to 13·7%]). The most common grade 3-4 adverse event in patients evaluated for chemotherapy toxicity was neutropenia (197 [74%] of 266 patients in the twice-daily group vs 170 [65%] of 263 in the once-daily group). Most toxicities were similar between the groups, except there was significantly more grade 4 neutropenia with twice-daily radiotherapy (129 [49%] vs 101 [38%]; p=0·05). In patients assessed for radiotherapy toxicity, was no difference in grade 3-4 oesophagitis between the groups (47 [19%] of 254 patients in the twice-daily group vs 47 [19%] of 246 in the once-daily group; p=0·85) and grade 3-4 radiation pneumonitis (4 [3%] of 254 vs 4 [2%] of 246; p=0·70). 11 patients died from treatment-related causes (three in the twice-daily group and eight in the once-daily group).

INTERPRETATION

Survival outcomes did not differ between twice-daily and once-daily concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer, and toxicity was similar and lower than expected with both regimens. Since the trial was designed to show superiority of once-daily radiotherapy and was not powered to show equivalence, the implication is that twice-daily radiotherapy should continue to be considered the standard of care in this setting.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK (Clinical Trials Awards and Advisory Committee), French Ministry of Health, Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (Cancer Research Fund, Lung Cancer, and Radiation Oncology Groups).

Apples and pears? A comparison of two sources of national lung cancer audit data in England

In 2014, the method of data collection from NHS trusts in England for the National Lung Cancer Audit (NLCA) was changed from a bespoke dataset called LUCADA (Lung Cancer Data). Under the new contract, data are submitted via the Cancer Outcome and Service Dataset (COSD) system and linked additional cancer registry datasets. In 2014, trusts were given opportunity to submit LUCADA data as well as registry data. 132 NHS trusts submitted LUCADA data, and all 151 trusts submitted COSD data. This transitional year therefore provided the opportunity to compare both datasets for data completeness and reliability. We linked the two datasets at the patient level to assess the completeness of key patient and treatment variables. We also assessed the interdata agreement of these variables using Cohen's kappa statistic, κ. We identified 26 001 patients in both datasets. Overall, the recording of sex, age, performance status and stage had more than 90% agreement between datasets, but there were more patients with missing performance status in the registry dataset. Although levels of agreement for surgery, chemotherapy and external-beam radiotherapy were high between datasets, the new COSD system identified more instances of active treatment. There seems to be a high agreement of data between the datasets, and the findings suggest that the registry dataset coupled with COSD provides a richer dataset than LUCADA. However, it lagged behind LUCADA in performance status recording, which needs to improve over time.

Multicenter, Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Pravastatin Added to First-Line Standard Chemotherapy in Small-Cell Lung Cancer (LUNGSTAR)

Purpose Treating small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains a therapeutic challenge. Experimental studies show that statins exert additive effects with agents, such as cisplatin, to impair tumor growth, and observational studies suggest that statins combined with anticancer therapies delay relapse and prolong life in several cancer types. To our knowledge, we report the first large, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of a statin with standard-of-care for patients with cancer, specifically SCLC. Patients and Methods Patients with confirmed SCLC (limited or extensive disease) and performance status 0 to 3 were randomly assigned to receive daily pravastatin 40 mg or placebo, combined with up to six cycles of etoposide plus cisplatin or carboplatin every 3 weeks, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, and toxicity. Results Eight hundred forty-six patients from 91 United Kingdom hospitals were recruited. The median age of recruited patients was 64 years of age, 43% had limited disease, and 57% had extensive disease. There were 758 deaths and 787 PFS events. No benefit was found for pravastatin, either in all patients or in several subgroups. For pravastatin versus placebo, the 2-year OS rate was 13.2% (95% CI, 10.0 to 16.7) versus 14.1% (95% CI, 10.9 to 17.7), respectively, with a hazard ratio of 1.01 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.16; P = .90. The median OS was 10.7 months v 10.6 months, respectively. The median PFS was 7.7 months v 7.3 months, respectively. The median OS (pravastatin v placebo) was 14.6 months in both groups for limited disease and 9.1 months versus 8.8 months, respectively, for extensive disease. Adverse events were similar between groups. Conclusion Pravastatin 40 mg combined with standard SCLC therapy, although safe, does not benefit patients. Our conclusions are the same as those found in all four much smaller, randomized, placebo-controlled trials specifically designed to evaluate statin therapy in patients with cancer.