Challenges in pressure ulcer prevention

Pressure ulcers/injuries prevention in emergency services: A scoping review

AIM OF THE STUDY

To map the available evidence on nursing care provided to prevent the development of pressure ulcers/injuries in emergency services.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Scoping review that follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and the Meta-Analyses extensions for Scoping Reviews and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. The inclusion criteria were based on the PCC mnemonic. The main variables of interest were the nursing care provided to prevent the development of pressure ulcers/injuries (Condition) reported in studies developed in hospital emergency services (Context) with adult participants (Population). The scoping review protocol was registered on the OSF platform.

RESULTS

During the selection process, 175 articles were identified in different databases. Applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 20 studies were included in this scoping review. The preventive measures for the development of pressure ulcers/injuries were grouped into 9 categories: "risk factors and risk assessment", "support surfaces", "dressings for pressure ulcer/injury prevention", "skin and tissue assessment", "repositioning and early mobilization", "preventive skin care", "nutrition in pressure ulcer/injury prevention", "health education" and "vital signs management". The instruments for assessing the risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries mentioned in the studies are the Braden, Waterlow and Norton scales. The most documented tool for assessing the risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries in hospital emergency services was the Braden Scale.

CONCLUSION

International literature identified several preventive interventions that could be implemented in emergency services to avoid pressure ulcers/injuries development. However, is crucial that those preventive interventions were systematic implemented (in combination) since hospital admission.

Comparison of "Semiocclusive Dressing" Treatment Using Plastic Wrap or Low-Adherent Absorbent Wound Dressings Versus Occlusive Dressing Treatment for Stage III/IV Pressure Injuries in the Inflammatory Phase: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of "semiocclusive dressing (SOD)" treatment using plastic wrap or low-adherent absorbent wound dressings with that of occlusive dressing (OD) treatment for National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel stage III/IV pressure injuries in the inflammatory phase. Approach: This 12-week, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted at one hospital and three care facilities. Seventy-seven participants were enrolled; 40 comprised the SOD group and 37 comprised the OD group. The primary outcome was the surface area reduction. Secondary outcomes included the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) score reductions, incidence of adverse events, and material cost. This trial met the recommendations of the CONSORT 2010 statement. Results: The surface area reduction of the SOD group was greater than that of the OD group throughout the study period. The significant interaction was revealed between treatment and time course (p < 0.0001). The 95% confidence interval of the difference at 12 weeks was 3.4 to 21.9. The median BWAT score reduction of the SOD group at 12 weeks was 23, and that of the OD group was 18.5 (p = 0.0077). The incidence of adverse events was comparable between groups. The OD treatment cost was 3.0 times higher than the SOD treatment cost (p = 0.0012). Innovation: Because the SOD does not completely occlude the wound, excess exudate drains from the wound. Therefore, SOD can treat the wound with abundant exudate effectively and safely. Conclusion: SOD treatment is more effective and less expensive than OD treatment for stage III/IV pressure injuries. Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry [UMIN000023412]. Registered on July 31, 2016.

Aetiology, risk factors and treatment of typical and atypical pressure ulcers in patients with traumatic brain injury: A narrative review

Pressure ulcers are one of the leading complications in bedridden patients that result in multiple burdens on healthcare systems and patients (11 billion dollars/year). The prevalence of pressure ulcers in traumatic brain injury patients is 1.5-fold compared with the other bedridden patients. Moreover, critical traumatic brain injury patients who are admitted to the intensive care unit experience severe pressure ulcers and further complications. The motor/sensory disabilities and low supplementation and oxygenation to the pressured side were the main mechanisms of the typical pressure ulcers. Intellectual evaluation is the first essential step to prevent the development of pressure ulcers in high-risk patients. Till now, different scales, including Injury Scale Score and Braden Scale Score, have been provided to assess the pressure ulcer. Since low stages of pressure ulcers heal rapidly, traumatic brain injury patients require a periodical assessment to prevent further developments timely. Alongside different procedures provided to prevent and treat any pressure ulcer, traumatic brain injury patients required additional specific protections. For the first line, fast and efficient rehabilitation repairs motor/sensory disabilities and decreases the chance of pressure ulcer. Our review indicated that pressure ulcer in traumatic brain injury had several complex mechanisms that demand special care. Therefore, further studies are required to address these mechanisms and prevent their progression to typical and atypical pressure ulcers.

Impact of Wound Dressing Changes on Nursing Workload in an Intensive Care Unit

The objective of this study is to understand how the type of wound dressing changes (routine or frequent) in patients admitted to intensive care units influences nurses' workload. This study used a database of retrospective and analytical observational study from one Portuguese intensive care unit. The sample included 728 adult patients admitted between 2015 and 2019. The nursing workload was assessed by the TISS-28 scale, both at admission and at discharge. The linear regression results show that patients with frequent dressing changes are associated with a higher nursing workload, both at admission (Coef. 1.65; 95% CI [0.53; 2.77]) and discharge (Coef. 1.27; 95% CI [0.32; 2.22]). In addition, age influences the nursing workload; older people are associated with a higher nursing workload (at admission Coef. 0.07; 95% CI [0.04; 0.10]; at discharge Coef. 0.08; 95% CI [0.05; 0.10]). Additionally, an increase in nursing workload at admission would significantly increase the nursing workload at discharge (Coef. 0.27; 95% CI [0.21; 0.33]). The relative stability of the nursing workload over the studied years is also another important finding (the influence of studied years is non-significant). In conclusion, patients with frequent dressing changes presented higher TISS-28 scores when compared with patients with an exchange of routine dressings, which leads to a higher nursing workload.

A systematic review of prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers/injuries in hospital emergency services

AIM

To develop a systematic review on the prevalence and the incidence of pressure ulcers/injuries in adult patients in hospital emergency services.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic review of prevalence and incidence studies developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items Form Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. The inclusion criteria were based on the CoCoPop mnemonic. The main variables of interest were the "prevalence" and/or the "incidence" of "pressure ulcers/injuries" (Condition) reported in studies developed in hospital emergency services (Context) with adult participants (Population). The Systematic Review Protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CDR42021252906).

RESULTS

The pressure ulcer/injury (point) prevalence ranged from 5.2% (at admission) to 12.3% (at discharge) and the pressure ulcer/injury incidence ranged from 4.5% to 78.4%. Most of the pressure ulcers/injuries documented were category/stage I. The most problematic anatomical locations were the sacrococcygeal region and the heels. The preventive measures should be implemented as soon as possible and are important in patients older than 75 years, with multiple comorbidities, high C-Reative Protein levels, cervical spine immobilization, presented to hospital emergency service by ambulance or with hypotension at the time of admission.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers/injuries in hospital emergency services remains an understudied topic which could limit the generalization of our data. This systematic review highlighted that the management of pressure ulcers/injuries is a real and current challenge in hospital emergency services. It is important to identify the patients at (higher) risk to establish an (earlier) preventive care plan according to patients and emergency services' characteristics.

Effectiveness of training in increasing awareness about managing pressure injuries in emergency departments

INTRODUCTION

Emergency room conditions and the characteristics of the patients followed up pose a risk for pressure injury.

AIM

This study was conducted as a pilot study to assess the effectiveness of a training program in increasing the awareness of healthcare professionals working in an emergency department about how to manage pressure injuries.

METHODS

The study was a prospective, pre-test post-test intervention study without a control group. The study included 595 patients who were hospitalized in the emergency room for more than two hours and voluntarily agreed to participate, as well as 11 physicians and 17 nurses working in the emergency department between 15 April and 19 June 2019 2019. It was carried out in three stages. In the first stage, the 30-day pressure injury incidence rate in the emergency department was evaluated using the "Emergency Department Patients Information and Pressure Injury Assessment Form" and "The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Injury Risk". In the second stage, the healthcare professionals were given training about pressure injuries. The knowledge levels of healthcare professionals before and after the training were evaluated using "The Descriptive Characteristics Form for Emergency Department Personnel (doctors and nurses)" and "The Questionnaire for Identifying and Preventing Pressure Injury". In the third stage, the 30-day pressure injury incidence rate in the was re-evaluated after the training using the same two scales as before. The SPSS 25 package program was used to evaluate the data in terms of frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation, and the Mann-Whitney U Test for independent groups, the t-test, the correlated sample t-test, the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, Pearson Chi-square test, Yates Chi-square test and Fisher's Exact Chi-square test were also used.

RESULTS

The mean knowledge test score of the healthcare professionals working in the emergency department was determined as X¯±SD = 53.71 ± 14.70 before the training and X¯±SD = 58.57 ± 11.83 after the training. The average score on the prevention dimension of the Questionnaire for Identifying and Preventing Pressure Injury was found to be statistically significantly higher than before the training (p < 0.05). The pressure injury incidence in the emergency department was 12.5% before the training and 8.8% afterwards.

CONCLUSION

It was observed that the knowledge of healthcare professionals about pressure injury was insufficient and that training given on this topic both increased their knowledge and decreased the incidence of pressure injury. However, the difference was not statistically significant. Training about pressure injuries is important for preventing pressure injury, identifying the injury early, treating the injury appropriately and increasing the awareness of healthcare professionals.

Prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers/injuries in emergency services: A systematic review protocol

AIM

To develop a systematic review protocol on the prevalence and/or the incidence of pressure ulcers/injuries in adult patients in emergency services.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items Form Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence studies. The inclusion criteria will be based on the CoCoPop mnemonic. The main variables of interest will be the "prevalence" and/or the "incidence" of "pressure ulcers/injuries" (Condition) reported in studies developed in emergency services (Context), with participants aged 18 or more (Population). This Systematic Review Protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CDR42021252906).

RESULTS

If meta-analysis is not possible, the syntheses of quantitative data will be presented in a narrative form to address the scope and objectives of this systematic review. Tables, graphs and/or figures will be designed to present the results of the prevalence and the incidence of pressure ulcers/injuries, their body locations and the respective categories/stages. The Systematic Review is currently ongoing.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence and incidence systematic reviews are an emerging methodology in the field of evidence synthesis. We believe that the systematic review on prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers/injuries in emergency services can provide useful information for healthcare professionals and policy makers about the dimension of this problem in a specific context. The standardized approach outlined in this systematic review protocol offers a rigorous and transparent method to conduct the review.

Effect of interface pressure and skin surface temperature on pressure injury incidence: a turning schedule pilot study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the interface pressure and skin surface temperature in relation to the incidence of pressure injury (PI) using three different turning schedules.

METHOD

This was a pilot study with a three-armed randomised clinical trial design. Participants at risk of PI and treated in the high dependency care unit in a regional hospital in Makassar, Indonesia participated in this study. Patients were repositioned at three different turning schedules (two-, three- and four-hourly intervals). Interface pressure measurement and skin surface temperature were measured between 14:00 and 18:00 every three days. The incidence of PI was assessed during the two-week observation period.

RESULTS

A total of 44 participants took part in the study. A one-way ANOVA test revealed no difference in interface pressure among the three different turning schedule groups within two weeks of observations: day zero, p=0.56; day four, p=0.95; day seven, p=0.56; day 10, p=0.63; and day 14, p=0.92. Although the average periumbilical temperature and skin surface temperature were not significant (p>0.05), comparison between these observation sites was significant on all observation days (p<0.05). Regarding the incidence of PI, the proportional hazard test for the development of PI in the three groups was considered not different (hazard ratio: 1.46, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-4.87, p=0.54).

CONCLUSION

No difference in interface pressure and incidence of PI on the three turning schedules was observed; however, there was a potential increase in skin surface temperature in comparison with periumbilical temperature for all three turning schedules.

Clinical effectiveness of a silicone foam dressing for the prevention of heel pressure ulcers in critically ill patients: Border II Trial

• OBJECTIVE

Critically ill patients are at high risk of developing pressure ulcers (PU), with the sacrum and heels being highly susceptible to pressure injuries. The objective of our study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a new multi-layer, self-adhesive soft silicone foam heel dressing to prevent PU development in trauma and critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).

• METHOD

A cohort of critically ill patients were enrolled at the Royal Melbourne Hospital. Each patient had the multi-layer soft silicone foam dressing applied to each heel on admission to the emergency department. The dressings were retained with a tubular bandage for the duration of the patients' stay in the ICU. The skin under the dressings was examined daily and the dressings were replaced every three days. The comparator for our cohort study was the control group from the recently completed Border Trial.

• RESULTS

Of the 191 patients in the initial cohort, excluding deaths, loss to follow-up and transfers to another ward, 150 patients were included in the final analysis. There was no difference in key demographic or physiological variables between the cohorts, apart from a longer ICU length of stay for our current cohort. No PUs developed in any of our intervention cohort patients compared with 14 patients in the control cohort (n=152; p<0.001) who developed a total of 19 heel PUs.

• CONCLUSION

We conclude, based on our results, that the multi-layer soft silicone foam dressing under investigation was clinically effective in reducing ICU-acquired heel PUs. The findings also support previous research on the clinical effectiveness of multi-layer soft silicone foam dressings for PU prevention in the ICU.

Dressings for preventing pressure ulcers: how do they work?

Pressure ulcers (PUs) negatively affect quality of life (QoL) and cause problems for patients, such as pain, distress and often specific difficulties with treatments used to manage the wound. Thus, it is important to implement appropriate prevention strategies in order to achieve high-quality care, thereby reducing the burden of PUs on patients, the healthcare system and society as a whole. PU development arises due to the adverse effects of pressure, shear, friction and moisture at the skin/surface interface. Preventive interventions typically include risk assessment, reducing pressure and minimising shear and friction. More recently, certain wound dressings, as a potential additional protective strategy for preventing PUs, have been introduced. This review explores the mechanisms of action of dressings for preventing PUs. Findings from the review indicate that decreasing frictional forces transmitted to the patient's skin is achieved by use of a dressing with an outer surface made from a low friction material. Furthermore, the ability of dressings to absorb and redistribute shear forces through good adhesion to the skin, high loft and lateral movement of the dressing layers is important in reducing shear forces. This is achieved when the dressing reduces pressure transmitted to the patient's tissues by the propriety of high loft/thickness and padding that allows a degree of cushioning of bony prominences. Further, dressings may reduce humidity at the skin/dressing interface, i.e., the dressing is absorbent and/or permits moisture to evaporate quickly. As part of an established PU prevention protocol, dressings may help decrease PU incidence.

Comparing the physical performance of liquid barrier films

Background

Barrier films have been used for many years to protect skin from the damaging effects of excessive moisture and mechanical injury. The performance characteristics important for these protective effects are mainly product durability and its ability to reduce the force of adhesive removal. Additionally, the moisture vapor transmission rate through the film needs to be high enough that maceration is prevented. The current study was undertaken to investigate various physical performance characteristics of six commercially available barrier films.

Materials and methods

Several bench tests were used to simulate performance features of the barriers on skin including barrier durability, breathability (moisture vapor permeability), and the effect on adhesive dressing force of removal.

Results

Results indicated that barrier films did not perform equivalently. However, Cavilon™ No Sting Barrier Film (NSB) was shown to have significantly greater durability in the barrier integrity test than all other barriers tested and was tied for highest breathability and highest reduction in peel force from steel. No other tested barrier film performed as consistently across the different tests.

Conclusion

These results may provide mechanistic understanding of how barriers such as NSB may clinically assist with the prevention of adhesive‐ and moisture‐related skin damage.

Incidence and risk factors associated with pressure injury in patients with traumatic brain injury

AIM

To identify the prevalence of pressure injury in patients diagnosed with traumatic brain injury and analyse the risk factors involved during hospitalization.

METHODS

This was a prospective study evaluating patients who were diagnosed with traumatic brain injury between November 2013 and September 2014. Patient characteristics, clinical and metabolic factors and therapeutic interventions, were evaluated within 30 days of hospital admission.

RESULTS

Most of the 240 patients included in the study were male, young, and non-Caucasian. The incidence of pressure injury was 18.8%. In terms of severity classification, the incidence of pressure injury was 2.7%, 23.2%, and 42.6% in mild, moderate, and severe traumatic brain injury, respectively. Pressure injury development was more likely in the first 10 days of hospitalization. A moderate or severe traumatic brain injury classification, the use of noradrenaline, and older age were pressure injury risk factors. The presence of pressure injury was associated with mortality within 30 days of hospitalization (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of pressure injury was high in patients diagnosed with traumatic brain injury, especially in those whose injury was classified as severe. Older age, noradrenaline use, and a classification of moderate or severe traumatic brain injury were identified as pressure injury risk factors.

Pressure ulcer prevalence and prevention rates in Abu Dhabi: an update

OBJECTIVE

This article compares the results from a recent pressure ulcer (PU) prevalence audit at the Sheikh Khalifa Medical City (SKMC) hospital in Abu Dhabi to identify the impact of new prevention initiatives introduced around 2013 and establish the effectiveness of PU prevention strategies, judged quality of nursing care, and costs associated with patients developing a hospital-acquired pressure ulcer (HAPU).

METHOD

The methods used were based on a previous point prevalence study involving 441 acute care patients, who were assessed using the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence (IPUP) Survey. Following pre-selection of a 24-hour period for data capture, hospital staff collected PU data. Hill-Rom provided SKMC with an electronic report comprising various epidemiological and financial outputs.

RESULTS

PU prevalence was 10.4% in 2018 versus 6.4% in 2013. The 2018 HAPU prevalence was 1.8% versus 2% in 2013. The 2018 findings were in line with IPUP's international benchmarks. In 2018, 99% of patients had their skin assessed and PU risk documented within 24 hours of admission, leading to rapid implementation of a prevention care plan. Most patients who developed a HAPU (n=8) were female (62%) and aged 20-29 years old (25%) or 70-79 years old (25%). All HAPU patients lay on three layers of linen, most on their side (88%) and 75% were hospitalised for >30 days. Costs were estimated for the eight HAPU patients; weighted average cost (per case) was around US$8035.32, giving a total estimated cost of US$64,282.54. Total annual cost (average length of stay basis) for the eight patients was estimated at US$1,830,082.32.

CONCLUSION

The PU prevention plan at SKMC proved to be effective, reflected by a low HAPU prevalence rate, suggesting an excellent quality of patient care.

Linking microvascular collapse to tissue hypoxia in a multiscale model of pressure ulcer initiation

Pressure ulcers are devastating injuries that disproportionately affect the older adult population. The initiating factor of pressure ulcers is local ischemia, or lack of perfusion at the microvascular level, following tissue compression against bony prominences. In turn, lack of blood flow leads to a drop in oxygen concentration, i.e, hypoxia, that ultimately leads to cell death, tissue necrosis, and disruption of tissue continuity. Despite our qualitative understanding of the initiating mechanisms of pressure ulcers, we are lacking quantitative knowledge of the relationship between applied pressure, skin mechanical properties as well as structure, and tissue hypoxia. This gap in our understanding is, at least in part, due to the limitations of current imaging technologies that cannot simultaneously image the microvascular architecture, while quantifying tissue deformation. We overcome this limitation in our work by combining realistic microvascular geometries with appropriate mechanical constitutive models into a microscale finite element model of the skin. By solving boundary value problems on a representative volume element via the finite element method, we can predict blood volume fractions in response to physiological skin loading conditions (i.e., shear and compression). We then use blood volume fraction as a homogenized variable to couple tissue-level skin mechanics to an oxygen diffusion model. With our model, we find that moderate levels of pressure applied to the outer skin surface lead to oxygen concentration contours indicative of tissue hypoxia. For instance, we show that applying a pressure of 60 kPa at the skin surface leads to a decrease in oxygen partial pressure from a physiological value of 65 mmHg to a hypoxic level of 31 mmHg. Additionally, we explore the sensitivity of local oxygen concentration to skin thickness and tissue stiffness, two age-related skin parameters. We find that, for a given pressure, oxygen concentration decreases with decreasing skin thickness and skin stiffness. Future work will include rigorous calibration and validation of this model, which may render our work an important tool toward developing better prevention and treatment tools for pressure ulcers specifically targeted toward the older adult patient population.

Pressure Redistribution Crib Mattress: A Quality Improvement Project

BACKGROUND

Selective use of pressure-redistributing support surfaces is considered an essential component of a pressure injury prevention bundle. Critically ill children who are too big for an isolette but too little for a bed are usually placed in critical care cribs that have unique features such as moveable side rails and a built-in scale for weighing the patient, but they do not have a mattress designed to redistribute pressure. The primary aim of this quality improvement project was to evaluate a pressure redistribution mattress designed for use in critical care cribs.

CASES

We retrospectively reviewed 22 charts of critically ill pediatric patients who participated in a product trial completed over a 12-week period in a stand-alone children's hospital in the Western United States. We reviewed demographic data, skin assessments, Braden Q Scale score, and support surface use. Our review revealed no pressure injury occurrences over the 12-week data collection period.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this quality improvement project suggest that the pressure-redistributing mattress, when used as part of an intervention bundle, prevents pressure injuries in critically ill pediatric patients.

Mitigating the damaging effects of tissue distortions by using a low-friction heel protector

This article reports the finding of a small non-controlled evaluation over a 2-week period in three different care settings: a residential care home, an acute stroke unit and a community intermediate care hospital. At initial recruitment 30 patients were identified by clinical assessment as being at high risk of developing a heel pressure ulcer. Further inclusion criteria were identifying heels that had signs of pressure damage occurring, blanching and non-blanching erythema, blistering and category 2 ulceration. In all, 15 patients fully completed the evaluation over a 14-day period. The mean age was 86 years. The low-friction bootee was worn constantly while in bed and seated in chairs, only being removed for heel checks and hygiene care. No patients were independently mobile during the evaluation; products were not worn to walk in due to a risk of falling-patients in the community hospital who had to mobilise for rehabilitation removed the bootees for this activity. All had pressure mapping and ultrasound of pedal pulses prior and after evaluation by the tissue viability specialist nurse. Results of pressure mapping showed a reduction of peak heel pressures on application of the bootees and a final review of reduction in visual signs of heel damage, reduced pain, increased comfort and ease of use. These results indicate that a standardised care pathway approach to heel protection using low-friction heel bootees is effective in all care settings for the reduction and prevention of heel pressure damage.

Microclimate evaluation of strap-based wheelchair seating systems for persons with spinal cord injury: A pilot study

STUDY PURPOSE

The purpose of this pilot study was to assess microclimate characteristics of two versions of a strap-based wheelchair seating system (perforated and solid straps) and to conduct preliminary microclimate comparisons of subjects' current wheelchair seating systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this pilot study, the microclimate properties of two variations (solid and perforated) of a strap-based seating system were compared with two commonly used seating systems. Six subjects sat on three different seating systems each for 100-min test periods, while temperature and relative humidity were measured with a single sensor adjacent to the skin-seat interface. Additionally, thermal images of the seat interface were collected before and after each test period.

RESULTS

The thermal images revealed that the maximum surface temperature of the solid-strap-based seating system was significantly lower than the other seating systems, -1.21 °C. (95% CI -2.11 to -0.30, p = 0.02), immediately following transfer out of the seat. Five minutes after transferring out of the seat, the perforated-strap seat was significantly cooler than the other seats -0.94 °C. (95% CI -1.59 to -0.30), p = 0.01, as was the solid-strap-based seat, -1.66 °C. (95% CI -2.69 to -0.63), p = 0.01. There were no significant differences in interface temperature or relative humidity measured with the single sensor near the skin-seat interface.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study offers preliminary evidence regarding the microclimate of the strap-based seating systems compared with other common seating systems. Clinically, the strap-based seating system may offer another option for those who struggle with microclimate management.

An Evaluation of the Role of an Intermediate Care Facility in the Continuum of Care in Western Cape, South Africa

Background: A comprehensive primary healthcare (PHC) approach requires clear referral and continuity of care pathways. South Africa is a lower-middle income country (LMIC) that lacks data on the role of intermediate care (IC) services in the health system. This study described the model of service provision at one facility in Cape Town, including reason for admission, the mix of services and skills provided and needed, patient satisfaction, patient outcome and articulation with other services across the spectrum of care.

Methods: A multi-method design was used. Sixty-eight patients were recruited over one month in mid-2011 in a prospective cohort. Patient data were collected from clinical record review and an interviewer-administered questionnaire, administered shortly after admission to assess primary and secondary diagnosis, referring institution, knowledge of and previous use of home based care (HBC) services, reason for admission and demographics. A telephonic questionnaire at 9-weeks post-discharge recorded their vital status, use of HBC post-discharge and their satisfaction with care received. Staff members completed a self-administered questionnaire to describe demographics and skills. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of survival.

Results: Of the 68 participants, 38% and 24% were referred from a secondary and tertiary hospital, respectively. Stroke (35%) was the most common single reason for admission. The three most common reasons reported why care was better at the IC facility were staff attitude, the presence of physiotherapy and the wound care. Even though most patients reported admission to another health facility in the preceding year, only 13 patients (21%) had ever accessed HBC and only 25% (n=15) of discharged patients used HBC post-discharge. Of the 57 patients traced on follow-up, 21(37%) had died. The presence of a Care-plan was significantly associated with a 62% lower risk of death (hazard ratio: 0.38; CI 0.15–0.97). Notably, 46% of staff members reported performing roles that were outside their scope of practice and there was a mismatch between what staff reported doing and their actual tasks.

Conclusion: Clients understood this service as a caring environment primarily responsible for rehabilitation services. A Care-plan beyond admission could significantly reduce mortality. There was poor referral to and poor articulation with HBC services. IC services should be recognised as an integral part of the health system and should be accessible.

Prevention of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries Associated With Respiratory Equipment Use in a Critical Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Project

Medical devices have been identified as an extrinsic risk factor for development of pressure injuries, with as many as 30% to 70% of medical device-related pressure injuries resulting from respiratory equipment. This article describes a quality improvement project undertaken to reduce the occurrence of respiratory device-related pressure injuries in a critically care unit. Multiple actions were implemented to achieve this goal. Respiratory therapists were trained to document occurrences on a daily basis, and apparent cause analyses were conducted on each occurrence. An interdisciplinary team conducted biweekly rounds on patients with respiratory devices and consulted other professionals as indicated. Nurses and respiratory therapists attended an evidence-based, collaborative, educational offering and completed a measure of team functioning before the program and at the end of the study period. The occurrence rates of respiratory device-related pressure injuries were reduced over the project period, and these changes were sustained over the subsequent 12 months.

Supplementing the Braden scale for pressure ulcer risk among medical inpatients: the contribution of self-reported symptoms and standard laboratory tests

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate medical inpatients' symptom experience and selected laboratory blood results as indicators of their pressure ulcer risk as measured by the Braden scale.

BACKGROUND

Pressure ulcers reduce quality of life and increase treatment costs. The prevalence of pressure ulcers is 6-23% in hospital populations, but literature suggests that most pressure ulcers are avoidable.

DESIGN

Prospective, cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

Three hundred and twenty-eight patients admitted to medical wards in an acute hospital in Oslo, Norway consented to participate. Data were collected on 10 days between 2012-2014 by registered nurses and nursing students. Pressure ulcer risk was assessed using the Braden scale, and scores <19 indicated pressure ulcer risk. Skin examinations were categorised as normal or stages I-IV using established definitions. Comorbidities were collected by self-report. Self-reported symptom occurrence and distress were measured with 15 items from the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, and pain was assessed using two numeric rating scales. Admission laboratory data were collected from medical records.

RESULTS

Prevalence of pressure ulcers was 11·9, and 20·4% of patients were identified as being at risk for developing pressure ulcers. Multivariable analysis showed that pressure ulcer risk was positively associated with age ≥80 years, vomiting, severe pain at rest, urination problems, shortness of breath and low albumin and was negatively associated with nervousness.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that using patient-reported symptoms and standard laboratory results as supplemental indicators of pressure ulcer risk may improve identification of vulnerable patients, but replication of these findings in other study samples is needed.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses play a key role in preventing pressure ulcers during hospitalisation. A better understanding of the underlying mechanisms may improve the quality of care. Knowledge about symptoms associated with pressure ulcer risk may contribute to a faster clinical judgment of patients at risk.

Pressure Injury Prevention in a Saudi Arabian Intensive Care Unit: Registered Nurse Attitudes Toward Prevention Strategies and Perceived Facilitators and Barriers to Evidence Implementation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine RNs' attitudes toward pressure injury (PI) prevention strategies. Barriers and facilitators perceived by RNs to potentially impact on the adoption and implementation of PI prevention interventions in the intensive care unit (ICU) were examined.

DESIGN

Descriptive cross-sectional survey.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

The target population was RNs practicing in an intensive care unit (ICU) of a major tertiary hospital, King Abdul-Aziz, Mecca, in Saudi Arabia. Fifty-six of the available 60 ICU RNs participated in this study.

METHODS

Data were collected via survey using the Attitude towards Pressure injury Prevention instrument, which included 13 items rated with 4-point Likert scale, and the modified Barriers and Facilitators tool, which included 27 items. The survey was organized into 3 parts: demographic information, potential barriers to optimal skin care, and potential facilitators to skin care. The survey took 10 to 15 minutes to complete. Data were analyzed with descriptive-correlation statistics and multiple regression analysis. Thematic analysis was undertaken for qualitative data.

RESULTS

Participants demonstrated positive attitudes toward PI prevention (μ = 38.19/52; 73.44%). No significant differences were found between demographic characteristics of the participants with the RNs' Attitude subscale and perceived barriers and facilitators associated with implementing PI prevention in the critical care setting. Several barriers influenced the ability of RNs to implement PI prevention strategies including time demands (β = .388; P = .011), limitation of RNs' knowledge (β = -.632; P = .022), and current documentation format (β = .344; P = .046). Statistically significant facilitating factors that increased respondents ability to undertake PI prevention were ease of obtaining pressure-reduction surfaces (β = -.388; P = .007), collaboration with interdisciplinary teams (β = .37; P = .02), and availability of appropriate skin care products (β = .44; P = .015). Thematic analysis of open-ended questions highlighted workload as a barrier that impedes the implementation of care specific to PI prevention.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this study highlighted that ICU RNs had a positive attitude toward PI prevention. This study also identified perceived factors influencing PI prevention in the ICU, both facilitators and barriers. Perceived facilitators included availability of pressure-relieving support surfaces and appropriate skin care products and collaboration with the healthcare professional team. However, perceived barriers included limited PI prevention knowledge of the nurse and RN workflow (time demands and documentation format). Findings from this study provide important information identifying context-specific factors that may influence the adoption and implementation of PI prevention interventions in the ICU.

Analyses of pressure ulcer point prevalence at the first skin assessment in a Portuguese hospital

AIM

To analyze the first pressure ulcer risk and skin assessment records of hospitalized adult patients in medical and surgical areas of Aveiro Hospital during 2012 in association with their demographic and clinical characteristics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis of electronic health record database from 7132 adult patients admitted to medical and surgical areas in a Portuguese hospital during 2012. The presence of (at least) one pressure ulcer at the first skin assessment in inpatient setting was associated with age, gender, type of admission, specialty units, length of stay, patient discharge and ICD-9 diagnosis.

RESULTS

Point prevalence of participants with pressure ulcer category/stage I-IV of 7.9% at the first skin assessment in inpatient setting. A total of 1455 pressure ulcers were documented, most of them category/stage I. The heels and the sacrum/coccyx were the most problematic areas. Participants with pressure ulcer commonly had two or more pressure ulcers.

CONCLUSIONS

The point prevalence of participants with pressure ulcer of our study was similar international literature. The presence of a pressure ulcer at the first skin assessment could be an important measure of frailty and the participants with pressure ulcer commonly had more than one documented pressure ulcer. Advanced age or lower Braden Scale scores or Emergency Service admission were relevant variables for the presence of (at least) one pressure ulcer at the first skin assessment in inpatient setting as well as respiratory, infectious or genitourinary system diseases.

Clinical effectiveness of a silicone foam dressing for the prevention of heel pressure ulcers in critically ill patients: Border II Trial

OBJECTIVE

Critically ill patients are at high risk of developing pressure ulcers (PU), with the sacrum and heels being highly susceptible to pressure injuries. The objective of our study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a new multi-layer, self-adhesive soft silicone foam heel dressing to prevent PU development in trauma and critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHOD

A cohort of critically ill patients were enrolled at the Royal Melbourne Hospital. Each patient had the multi-layer soft silicone foam dressing applied to each heel on admission to the emergency department. The dressings were retained with a tubular bandage for the duration of the patients' stay in the ICU. The skin under the dressings was examined daily and the dressings were replaced every three days. The comparator for our cohort study was the control group from the recently completed Border Trial.

RESULTS

Of the 191 patients in the initial cohort, excluding deaths, loss to follow-up and transfers to another ward, 150 patients were included in the final analysis. There was no difference in key demographic or physiological variables between the cohorts, apart from a longer ICU length of stay for our current cohort. No PUs developed in any of our intervention cohort patients compared with 14 patients in the control cohort (n=152; p<0.001) who developed a total of 19 heel PUs.

CONCLUSION

We conclude, based on our results, that the multi-layer soft silicone foam dressing under investigation was clinically effective in reducing ICU-acquired heel PUs. The findings also support previous research on the clinical effectiveness of multi-layer soft silicone foam dressings for PU prevention in the ICU.

Patient and organisational variables associated with pressure ulcer prevalence in hospital settings: a multilevel analysis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association of ward-level differences in the odds of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) with selected ward organisational variables and patient risk factors.

DESIGN

Multilevel approach to data from 2 cross-sectional studies.

SETTINGS

4 hospitals in Norway were studied.

PARTICIPANTS

1056 patients at 84 somatic wards.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

HAPU.

RESULTS

Significant variance in the odds of HAPUs was found across wards. A regression model using only organisational variables left a significant variance in the odds of HAPUs across wards but patient variables eliminated the across-ward variance. In the model including organisational and patient variables, significant ward-level HAPU variables were ward type (rehabilitation vs surgery/internal medicine: OR 0.17 (95% CI 0.04 to 0.66)), use of preventive measures (yes vs no: OR 2.02 (95% CI 1.12 to 3.64)) and ward patient safety culture (OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.99)). Significant patient-level predictors were age >70 vs <70 (OR 2.70 (95% CI 1.54 to 4.74)), Braden scale total score (OR 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.80)) and overweight (body mass index 25-29.99 kg/m(2)) (OR 0.32 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.62)).

CONCLUSIONS

The fact that the odds of HAPU varied across wards, and that across-ward variance was reduced when the selected ward-level variables entered the explanatory model, indicates that the HAPU problem may be reduced by ward-level organisation of care improvements, that is, by improving the patient safety culture and implementation of preventive measures. Some wards may prevent pressure ulcers better than other wards. The fact that ward-level variation was eliminated when patient-level HAPU variables were included in the model indicates that even wards with the best HAPU prevention will be challenged by an influx of high-risk patients.

The biomechanical efficacy of dressings in preventing heel ulcers

The heels are the most common site for facility-acquired pressure ulcers (PUs), and are also the most susceptible location for deep tissue injuries. The use of multilayer prophylactic dressings to prevent heel PUs is a relatively new prevention concept, generally aimed at minimizing the risk for heel ulcers (HUs) through mechanical cushioning and reduction of friction at the dressing-support interface. We used 9 finite element model variants of the posterior heel in order to evaluate the biomechanical performance of a multilayer dressing in prevention of HUs during supine lying. We compared volumetric exposures of the loaded soft tissues to effective and maximal shear strains, as well as peak stresses in the Achilles tendon, without any dressing and with a single-layer or a multilayer dressing (Mepilex(®) Border Heel-type), on supports with different stiffnesses. The use of the multilayer dressing consistently and considerably reduced soft tissue exposures to elevated strains at the posterior heel, on all of the tested support surfaces and when loaded with either pure compression or combined compression and shear. The aforementioned multilayer design showed (i) clear benefit over a single-layer dressing in terms of dissipating tissue strains, by promoting internal shear in the dressing which diverts loads from tissues; (ii) a protective effect that was consistent on supports with different stiffnesses. Recent randomized controlled trials confirmed the efficacy of the simulated multilayer dressing, and so, taken together with this modeling work, the use of a prophylactic multilayer dressing indicates a great promise in taking this route for prevention.

The prevalence, prevention and multilevel variance of pressure ulcers in Norwegian hospitals: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Pressure ulcers are preventable adverse events. Organizational differences may influence the quality of prevention across wards and hospitals.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence of pressure ulcers, patient-related risk factors, the use of preventive measures and how much of the pressure ulcer variance is at patient, ward and hospital level.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Six of the 11 invited hospitals in South-Eastern Norway agreed to participate.

PARTICIPANTS

Inpatients ≥18 years at 88 somatic hospital wards (N=1209). Patients in paediatric and maternity wards and day surgery patients were excluded.

METHODS

The methodology for pressure ulcer prevalence studies developed by the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel was used, including demographic data, the Braden scale, skin assessment, the location and severity of pressure ulcers and preventive measures. Multilevel analysis was used to investigate variance across hierarchical levels.

RESULTS

The prevalence was 18.2% for pressure ulcer category I-IV, 7.2% when category I was excluded. Among patients at risk of pressure ulcers, 44.3% had pressure redistributing support surfaces in bed and only 22.3% received planned repositioning in bed. Multilevel analysis showed that although the dominant part of the variance in the occurrence of pressure ulcers was at patient level there was also a significant amount of variance at ward level. There was, however, no significant variance at hospital level.

CONCLUSIONS

Pressure ulcer prevalence in this Norwegian sample is similar to comparable European studies. At-risk patients were less likely to receive preventive measures than patients in earlier studies. There was significant variance in the occurrence of pressure ulcers at ward level but not at hospital level, indicating that although interventions for improvement are basically patient related, improvement of procedures and organization at ward level may also be important.