Ten-year analyses of the German DRG data about negative pressure wound therapy

Concurrent optical and magnetic stimulation therapy in patients with lower extremity hard-to-heal wounds

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of patients with hard-to-heal wounds represents a major multidisciplinary challenge. Therefore, the development and clinical validation of new technologies remains extremely important. The novel application of concurrent optical and magnetic stimulation (COMS) offers a promising noninvasive approach to support physiological wound healing processes, especially in hard-to-heal wounds.

METHOD

In a multicentre, prospective, comparative, clinical trial, patients with hard-to-heal wounds on lower extremities of different aetiologies were treated with COMS as an adjunct to standard of care (SOC). The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints were wound healing, pain and wound-specific quality of life (Wound-QoL).

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were enrolled in this study (intention to treat population (ITTP), n=40). Of these patients, 37 were included in the analysis of the primary endpoint (primary endpoint population, (PEP), n=37). A further subgroup of 30 patients was included in the analysis of the secondary endpoint (secondary endpoint population (SEP), n=30). Finally, the SEP was stratified regarding patients' responsiveness to SOC in an SOC non-responder subgroup (NRSG), n=21, and in an SOC responder subgroup (RSG), n=9. A total of 102 adverse events (AEs) were recorded, of which 96% were 'mild' or 'moderate', and 91% were either a singular or transient event. Only 11 AEs were serious and associated with inpatient treatments unrelated to the studied intervention. In the NRSG, reductions in wound size were found to be statistically significant within the different study periods. Additionally, an acceleration of the healing rate was detected between the baseline and the first four weeks of COMS treatment (p=0.041). The rate of near-complete and complete wound closure in the SEP after 12 weeks were 60% and 43%, respectively. Pain reduction across the treatment group was statistically significant (p≤0.002 for both the SEP and NRSG). The Wound-QoL score improved by 24% during the study (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this study, COMS treatment for patients with hard-to-heal wounds on lower extremities was a safe and effective novel treatment option, especially for patients who did not respond to SOC.

Retained Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Foams as a Cause of Infection Persistence

Significance: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has become a valuable adjunct in the treatment of acute and chronic wounds in several surgical disciplines. Retained foams are among its side effects, and they pose a rare but devastating complication at the site of this therapy, which might be associated with wound-healing complications, infection persistence, repeated surgical revisions, and prolonged antibiotic courses. Recent Advances: In the past 15 years, an increasing number of studies have identified this potential problem. Although the exact incidence remains unknown, initial studies have indicated rates of up to 10% in large collectives being treated by NPWT. Critical Issues: The lack of radiopaque markers does not allow for the visual control of retained foams using plain radiographs. Further imaging methods (e.g., CT and MRI) also do not help in adequate differential diagnosis. The lack of routine documentation of the number, type, and localization of the inserted foam(s) and unplanned surgery with a different surgical team pose risk factors for foam retainment. Future Directions: Introducing new documentation records for wounds treated with NPWT is recommended. At foam removal, all dressing materials should be examined for integrity. The development of foams with radiopaque markers by the industry, such as those routinely used in surgical gauze swabs, might also be a useful step to minimize the risk of foam retainment within wounds.

Use of maggot debridement therapy in hospitalised patients in Germany

Exact data regarding the clinical role of maggot debridement therapy (MDT) for wound care in a specific country are not available. Thus, we analysed the use of MDT in hospitalised patients in Germany. Detailed lists of all hospitalised cases treated with MDT in Germany for the years 2011 to 2016 were provided by the Federal Statistical Office as well as the lists of the 15 most frequent principal and additional diagnoses, respectively, and the 10 most frequent procedures documented with MDT in 2016. Within the 6-year time period of the study, the number of cases treated with MDT increased by 11% from 4513 in 2011 to 5.017 in 2016. Lower leg and foot were the most frequent anatomic sides of treatment counting up to 83.9% of all cases. In addition, MDT procedures for temporary soft tissue coverage including negative pressure wound therapy were often performed: for treatment of large areas in 36.7% and small areas in 6.2%. 41.3% of all cases treated with MDT had infection with Escherichia coli and 35.9% of all cases with Bacillus fragilis. Our analysis shows a limited use of MDT with a small increase only in the last 6 years in German hospitals. MDT is predominately used to treat foot or leg ulcers.

A cross-sectional survey of patients with open surgical wounds in Slovenia

Most surgical wounds heal by primary intention, that is, the wound is closed with sutures, clips, or glue. However, some surgical wounds are either left open to heal from the bottom up ("healing by secondary intention") or break open partially or fully after primary closure. There is little basic knowledge about the occurrence and natural history of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention (SWHSI); therefore, the aim of this survey was to estimate the number of people with SWHSI in Slovenia, the nature of these wounds, and to investigate how they are managed. A multiservice, cross-sectional survey was carried out over a 2-week period in the city of Ljubljana, Slovenia (population 288,919). Healthcare professionals across health and social care settings completed one anonymised form for each patient with a SWHSI. Forms were completed for 110 patients. The point prevalence of SWHSI was 0.38 per 1,000 of the population (95% CI: 0.33-0.44). Patients' mean age was 50.5 years. The majority of SWHSI were planned to heal by secondary intention before surgery (76/110, 69%). Of SWHSI, 83% (92/110) were treated with wound dressings, and 6% were treated with negative pressure wound therapy. Data were missing for 11 cases. This survey is the first to provide essential information about the extent, nature, and treatment of SWHSI in Slovenia. Furthermore, it is one of the latest of a very small number of studies to have contributed to knowledge about SWHSI globally. The results from the survey can be used for planning future research, health resources management, and policy development.