Outcomes and prognosis of diabetic foot ulcers treated by an interdisciplinary team in Canada

Effectiveness of Ya-Samarn-Phlae in diabetic wound healing: Evidence from in vitro studies and a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Ya-Samarn-Phlae (YaSP) has traditionally been widely used in southern Thailand for treating chronic and infected wounds, including diabetic foot ulcers. However, there are only a limited number of clinical studies supporting the use of this polyherbal formulation. Therefore, the present work aims to provide clinical evidence to support the application of YaSP, prepared according to a standardized traditional procedure (T-YaSP). Additionally, its potential chemical markers and wound healing-related biological activities were examined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The in vitro wound healing-related biological activities of YaSP ethanol extract and T-YaSP, including antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus epidermidis, inhibition and eradication of staphylococcal biofilm, anti-inflammatory effects, and enhancement of human dermal fibroblast migration in scratch wounds, were examined using well-established protocols. The chemical profiles of the ethanol extract of YaSP and T-YaSP were compared, and with promising chemical markers, arecoline, alpha-mangostin, and curcumin were selected and quantified using the HPLC method. A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, parallel-group study was conducted over 12 weeks to evaluate the efficacy of the YaSP solution as an adjunct therapy, combined with standard wound care, for diabetic ulcers compared to standard treatment.

RESULTS

The YaSP extract reduces NO production and can scavenge NO radicals in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 macrophage cells. Additionally, in a scratch assay, this extract and one of its herbal components, Curcuma longa, enhance the migration of human dermal fibroblasts. T-YaSP, containing 2.412 ± 0.002 mg/g of arecoline, 2.399 ± 0.005 mg/g of curcumin, and 0.017 ± 0.000 mg/g of α-mangostin, has shown the ability to inhibit the development and eradicate the mature biofilm of S. epidermidis. The use of T-YaSP as an adjunct therapy led to a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving healing within six weeks compared to the standard treatment group (36%/9 patients vs. 4%/1 patient; p = 0.013). After 12 weeks, 19 out of 25 patients in the T-YaSP group experienced complete healing, whereas only four patients in the standard treatment group achieved complete wound healing (76% in the T-YaSP group vs. 16% in the control group; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results presented here represent the first randomized controlled trial to demonstrate the effectiveness of the traditional polyherbal solution, T-YaSP, which exhibits a wide range of wound healing-related activities. Utilizing T-YaSP as an adjunctive treatment resulted in a significant improvement in the number of type 2 diabetic patients achieving complete healing. However, to explore and utilize YaSP further, conducting a double-blind, randomized controlled trial with a larger population is necessary.

Towards a Remote Patient Monitoring Platform for Comprehensive Risk Evaluations for People with Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) significantly affect the lives of patients and increase the risk of hospital stays and amputation. We suggest a remote monitoring platform for better DFU care. This system uses digital health metrics (scaled from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate a greater risk of slow healing) to provide a comprehensive overview through a visual interface. The platform features smart offloading devices that capture behavioral metrics such as offloading adherence, daily steps, and cadence. Coupled with remotely measurable frailty and phenotypic metrics, it offers an in-depth patient profile. Additional demographic data, characteristics of the wound, and clinical parameters, such as cognitive function, were integrated, contributing to a comprehensive risk factor profile. We evaluated the feasibility of this platform with 124 DFU patients over 12 weeks; 39% experienced unfavorable outcomes such as dropout, adverse events, or non-healing. Digital biomarkers were benchmarked (0-10); categorized as low, medium, and high risk for unfavorable outcomes; and visually represented using color-coded radar plots. The initial results of the case reports illustrate the value of this holistic visualization to pinpoint the underlying risk factors for unfavorable outcomes, including a high number of steps, poor adherence, and cognitive impairment. Although future studies are needed to validate the effectiveness of this visualization in personalizing care and improving wound outcomes, early results in identifying risk factors for unfavorable outcomes are promising.

Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Based on an Interdisciplinary Team Approach: Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study of Patients' Views on Quality of Care

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients' perception and quality of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) care delivered by an interdisciplinary team approach (ITA).

DESIGN

Exploratory cross-sectional study.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

Twenty patients with a healed plantar DFU were recruited from an interdisciplinary Wound Care clinic of a Canadian University affiliated hospital. Their mean age was 64 years (75% were males [n = 15]), 18 (90%) were living with type 2 diabetes, and 45% (n = 9) had osteomyelitis in the previous year of their enrollment in the study.

METHODS

The validated short form of the Quality From the Patient's Perspective questionnaire was used to evaluate quality of care dimensions (medical-technical competence of the caregivers; physical-technical conditions of the care organization; degree of identity-orientation in the attitudes and actions of the caregivers; and sociocultural atmosphere of the care organization).

RESULTS

Respondents reported experiencing a high level of quality care with an ITA. All indicators of patient-perceived reality of care delivered were superior or equal related to their subjective importance in all dimensions of quality care (with scores ranging from 3.85 to 4.00 on a 4-Point Likert scale). Patients' satisfaction regarding the ITA was high.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings suggest that an ITA model provided high quality of care for treating DFUs for all quality dimensions judged important for patients.

Developing an interprofessional decision support tool for diabetic foot ulcers management in primary care within the family medicine group model: a Delphi study in Canada

BACKGROUND

Primary care professionals encounter difficulties coordinating the continuum of care between primary care providers and second-line specialists and adhere to practice guidelines pertaining to diabetic foot ulcers management. Family medicine groups are providing primary care services aimed to improve access, interdisciplinary care, coordination and quality of health services, and reduce emergency department visits. Most professionals working in family medicine groups are primary care physicians and registered nurses. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an interprofessional decision support tool to guide the management of diabetic foot ulcers for primary care professionals working within the family medicine group model.

METHODS

A one-page decision tool developed by the research team was validated by an expert panel using a three-round Delphi protocol held between December 2019 and August 2021. The tool includes 43 individual actions and a care pathway from initial presentation to secondary prevention. Data collection was realized with both paper and electronic questionnaires, and answers were compiled in an electronic spreadsheet. Data was analyzed with use of descriptive statistics, and consensus for each item was defined as ≥ 80% agreement.

RESULTS

Experts from 12 pre-identified professions of the diabetic foot ulcer interdisciplinary care team were included, 39 participants out of the 59 invited to first round (66.1%), 34 out of 39 for second (87.2%) and 22 out of 34 for third (64.7%) rounds. All items included in the final version of the decision support tool reached consensus and were deemed clear, relevant and feasible. One or more professionals were identified to be responsible for every action to be taken.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided a comprehensive decision support tool to guide primary care professionals in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Implementation and evaluation in the clinical setting will need to be undertaken in the future.

Comparative analysis of surgical and non-surgical wound approaches in diabetic foot ulcer treatment: Meta-analysis and systematic review

The assessment for safety and effectiveness of surgical interventions in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in comparison to non-surgical approaches was performed. A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and EMBASE in order to identify case-control studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, cohort studies and observational studies pertaining to DFU treatments. Studies conducted in English language and focusing on wound healing rates, recurrence rates, time to healing and complication management met the inclusion criteria. There were six studies included in this meta-analysis. Surgical procedures, such as debridement, revascularization and skin transplantation, demonstrated significantly superior efficacy in promoting wound healing (84%) and shorter duration of healing (6 weeks) in comparison to non-surgical approaches, including off-loading, wound dressings and pharmacological therapies. Surgical interventions for DFUs resulted in a wound recovery rate of 84%, a significantly higher mean rate than non-surgical approaches (60%) that was observed. In addition, it was observed that the surgical group experienced considerably reduced average healing period of 9 weeks, in contrast to the non-surgical group's mean healing period of 12 weeks. Nevertheless, it is imperative to acknowledge that surgical procedures were notably correlated with a heightened occurrence of complications, such as amputations, which transpired in 19% of instances. Surgical interventions for DFUs may provide superior short-term results with regard to healing rates and recovery time, as indicated by this meta-analysis. However, they are additionally correlated with the heightened likelihood of complications. Although non-surgical techniques offered comparatively secure option, they were also less reliable. Individualized treatment modalities should be chosen in consideration of patient-specific factors and comparative advantages and disadvantages.

A novel Canadian multidisciplinary acute care pathway for people hospitalised with a diabetic foot ulcer

This manuscript describes the implementation and initial evaluation of a novel Canadian acute care pathway for people with a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). A multidisciplinary team developed and implemented an acute care pathway for patients with a DFU who presented to the emergency department (ED) and required hospitalisation at a tertiary care hospital in Canada. Processes of care, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalisation costs were considered through retrospective cohort study of all DFU hospitalizations from pathway launch in December 2018 to December 2020. There were 82 DFU-related hospital admissions through the ED of which 55 required invasive intervention: 28 (34.1%) minor amputations, 16 (19.5%) abscess drainage and debridement, 6 (7.3%) lower extremity revascularisations, 5 (6.1%) major amputations. Mean hospital LOS was 8.8 ± 4.9 days. Mean hospitalisation cost was $20 569 (±14 143): $25 901 (±15 965) when surgical intervention was required and $9279 (±7106) when it was not. LOS and hospitalisation costs compared favourably to historical data. An acute care DFU pathway can support the efficient evaluation and management of patients hospitalised with a DFU. A dedicated multidisciplinary DFU care team is a valuable resource for hospitals in Canada.

Remission Strategies with Fat Grafting to Prevent Recurrence of Pedal Ulcerations and Pain: A Case Series

Background

Foot deformities and gait abnormalities can result in locally elevated peak pedal pressures or atypical pedal biomechanics. Combined with underlying comorbidities such as neuropathy, stroke, atrophic fat padding and history of ulcerations, this can lead to recurrent ulcerations and pain. Pedal fat grafting (PFG) is a treatment modality that has been shown to reduce peak pressures and accelerate wound healing. This study aimed to investigate the utility of PFG to treat and prevent ulcerations.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed medical history, demographics, wound volume at time of procedure, volume of fat injected, surgical outcomes, and presence of new wounds in 15 patients who underwent PFG at Keck Hospital between 2018 and 2023.

Results

Seventeen feet from 15 patients (63 ± 12 years old, body mass index 30.9 ± 3.1) received PFG with an average volume of fat injected of 10.7 mL and procedure time of 84.6 minutes. At the time of PFG, nine wounds were present on nine feet with an average wound volume of 1.6 ± 2.7 cm3. Average follow-up was 6.9 months (range 1-36 months), with no complications or recurrent ulcerations since the procedure.

Conclusions

PFG is a promising treatment option for reducing peak pedal pressure and preventing ulcer recurrence in patients with various conditions. Further study is warranted for long-term follow-up.

Prognostic factors for delayed healing of complex wounds in adults: A scoping review

Complex or hard-to-heal wounds continue to be a challenge because of the negative impact they have on patients, caregivers, and all the associated costs. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for the delayed healing of complex wounds. Five databases and grey literature were the sources used to research adults with pressure ulcers/injuries, venous leg ulcers, critical limb-threatening ischaemia, or diabetic foot ulcers and report the prognostic factors for delayed healing in all care settings. In the last 5 years, a total of 42 original peer-reviewed articles were deemed eligible for this scoping review that followed the JBI recommendations and checklist PRISMA-ScR. The most frequent prognostic factors found with statistical significance coinciding with various wound aetiologies were: gender (male), renal disease, diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, the decline in activities of daily life, wound duration, wound area, wound location, high-stage WIfI classification, gangrene, infection, previous ulcers, and low ankle brachial index. It will be essential to apply critical appraisal tools and assessment risk of bias to the included studies, making it possible to make recommendations for clinical practice and build prognostic models. Future studies are recommended because the potential for healing through identification of prognostic factors can be determined, thus allowing an appropriate therapeutic plan to be developed.

Wound healing and healing process in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: A survival analysis study

AIMS

This study aimed to identify demographic, clinical, and psychological contributors to DFU healing and favorable healing process.

METHODS

Patients with a chronic DFU were evaluated at baseline (T0; n = 153), two months later (T1; n = 108), and six months later (T2; n = 71). Patients were evaluated on health literacy, perceived stress, anxiety, depression, and illness perceptions. Cox proportional hazard models were built to analyze the predictors of DFU healing and favorable healing process (wound area reduction), including the assessment of time to achieve those outcomes.

RESULTS

More than half of patients had their DFU healed (56.1%) or showed a favorable healing process (83.6%). Median time for healing was 112 days, while for favorable process was 30 days. Illness perceptions were the only predictor of wound healing. Being female , with adequate health literacy, and a first DFU predicted a favorable healing process.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study showing that beliefs about DFU are significant predictors of DFU healing, and that health literacy is a significant predictor of a favorable healing process. Brief, comprehensive interventions should be implemented, at the treatment initial stage, in order to change misperceptions and to promote DFU literacy and better health outcomes.

Prognostic Factors for Delayed Healing of Complex Wounds in Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol

(1) Background: The high prevalence of persons with wounds and its consequences for a person's quality of life makes the issue a relevant focus of attention for healthcare professionals. Through prognostic factors for healing, the individual risk of complications can be predicted, is possible to predict imminent delays and guide decision-making, thus helping healthcare professionals. (2) Methods: A scoping review performed according to JBI methodology and guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist will aim to identify the studies that meet predefined eligibility criteria. Five databases and gray literature will be the sources used to research adults with pressure ulcers, venous leg ulcers, arterial ulcers, or diabetic foot ulcers and report the prognostic factors for delayed healing in any care setting. (3) Results: This review will consider all quantitative and mixed studies in the last five years. The selection of articles will be carried out by two reviewers independently, using EndNoteWeb and Rayyan. Prognostic factors will be presented by design study, sampling, setting, outcome, wound type, and statistical methods. (4) Conclusions: Mapping prognostic factors for delayed healing could also be a starting point for a systematic review and meta-analyses to quantify the value of each factor.

Utilizing a Comprehensive Wound Care Team to Lower Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in an Academic Public Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) have significant impacts on patient morbidity and mortality, with approximately 2.5 million patients treated for pressure-related injuries annually.1 This study aimed to describe the influence of a comprehensive wound care team on HAPIs over an 8-year period.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

All inpatients at an academic public hospital system with HAPIs during the study period from May 2012 to February 2020.

METHODS

Data on wound stage, location, infection, medical device location if applicable, and risk factors were recorded from medical records. A 1-way analysis of variance was performed to assess for significance of mean number of cases, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) stage on initial presentation, and mean number of medical device-related wounds by year.

RESULTS

A total of 957 cases were included. The median stage of pressure injury on assessment was 2, with the mean NPIAP stage declining from 2012 to 2020 (P = .003). Thirty-three percent of pressure injuries were attributed to medical devices, most commonly endotracheal tubing. The most common site of pressure injury was the sacrum (33.6%).

CONCLUSION

Creation of a comprehensive wound care team within our academic public hospital system demonstrated a significant decline in device-related and pressure injury cases over the past 8 years. The wound care team focused on frequent assessment, education, and evidence-based treatment to lower these HAPI events.

Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Risk of Hard-to-Heal Diabetic Foot Ulcers in a Chinese Population

BACKGROUND

Early detection of hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is vital to prevent a poor prognosis. The purpose of this work was to employ clinical characteristics to create an optimal predictive model of hard-to-heal DFUs (failing to decrease by >50% at 4 weeks) based on machine learning algorithms.

METHODS

A total of 362 DFU patients hospitalized in two tertiary hospitals in eastern China were enrolled in this study. The training dataset and validation dataset were split at a ratio of 7:3. Univariate logistic analysis and clinical experience were utilized to screen clinical characteristics as predictive features. The following six machine learning algorithms were used to build prediction models for differentiating hard-to-heal DFUs: support vector machine, the naïve Bayesian (NB) model, k-nearest neighbor, general linear regression, adaptive boosting, and random forest. Five cross-validations were employed to realize the model's parameters. Accuracy, precision, recall, F1-scores, and AUCs were utilized to compare and evaluate the models' efficacy. On the basis of the best model identified, the significance of each characteristic was evaluated, and then an online calculator was developed.

RESULTS

Independent predictors for model establishment included sex, insulin use, random blood glucose, wound area, diabetic retinopathy, peripheral arterial disease, smoking history, serum albumin, serum creatinine, and C-reactive protein. After evaluation, the NB model was identified as the most generalizable model, with an AUC of 0.864, a recall of 0.907, and an F1-score of 0.744. Random blood glucose, C-reactive protein, and wound area were determined to be the three most important influencing factors. A corresponding online calculator was created (https://predicthardtoheal.azurewebsites.net/).

CONCLUSION

Based on clinical characteristics, machine learning algorithms can achieve acceptable predictions of hard-to-heal DFUs, with the NB model performing the best. Our online calculator can assist doctors in identifying the possibility of hard-to-heal DFUs at the time of admission to reduce the likelihood of a dismal prognosis.

Adequacy Between Canadian Clinical Guidelines and Recommendations Compared With International Guidelines for the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

OBJECTIVES

Although quality of care in the prevention and management of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) has improved with the use of comprehensive evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, disparities between national and international guidelines have been demonstrated in one study conducted in Western Pacific regions. Although there are challenges of systematic implementation of evidence-based care in some clinical settings, their applications have demonstrated positive outcomes on DFU-associated burdens in many countries. The aim of this study was to review and evaluate 3 Canadian clinical practice guidelines and recommendations (CPGRs) in comparison with the 2019 International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) guidelines.

METHODS

Extraction of all 85 recommendations from the IWGDF guidelines was performed and 3 independent investigators used a rating recommendations adequacy method with descriptive statistics. The Appraisal of Guidelines REsearch & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument was used for quality appraisal and reliability scores were noted using intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The Wounds Canada CPGR had the higher adequacy with the IWGDF guidelines. However, its development method was poor to fair. The Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario CPGR was superior for its development and implementation strategies, but major gaps were found in all chapters. The Diabetes Canada CPGR obtained a good quality appraisal evaluation, but was not dedicated exclusively to DFU and some important recommendations were absent. Reliability scores of AGREE II were good between investigators (p<0.0001). Some disparities were noted between Canadian and international recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Some disparities were noted, future orientations for development should include various health-care professionals involved in the team approach, patient-oriented research, recommendations published along with their level of evidence and strength of recommendations (such as with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations system) and implementation strategies to enhance evidence-based practice in Canada.

Outcomes and prognosis of diabetic foot ulcers treated by an interdisciplinary team in Canada

The aim of this study was to determine the wound healing outcomes of patients with a plantar diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) treated with an interdisciplinary team approach, and to identify associated variables. A retrospective observational cohort study of 140 adult patients, with a plantar DFU, treated between 2012 and 2018 at a wound care clinic of a University affiliated hospital was conducted. Predictive and explicative analyses were conducted with logistic multivariate methods and with a Receiver Operating Characteristics curve. The best predictor of wound healing at 3 months was a 41.8% wound size reduction at 4 weeks (AUC: 0.86; sensitivity: 83.1%; specificity: 67.2%, positive predictive value: 72.8%; negative predictive value: 78.9%; positive and negative likelihood ratios: 2.53 and 0.25, respectively). Main baseline variables independently associated with this predictor were: a monophasic Doppler waveform (OR 7.52, 95% CI [2.64–21.39]), cigarette smoking (OR 4.7, 95% CI [1.44–15.29]), and male gender (OR 3.58, 95% CI [1.30–9.87]). The health care provider should be cautious and intensify its management of DFUs particularly with patients of male gender; smoking, having a monophasic waveform with a hand‐held Doppler, and not achieving a minimal 41.8% wound area reduction at 4 weeks of treatment.