Diabetic foot ulcer, the effect of resource-poor environments on healing time and direct cost: A cohort study during Syrian crisis

Effectiveness of continuous home wound care on patients with diabetic foot ulcers

AIMS

To explore the effectiveness of continuous home wound care on patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).

DESIGN

A non-randomized parallel controlled non-inferiority trial.

METHODS

Patients with Wagner grade I-III DFUs hospitalized in two distant campuses of the same hospital were included. All patients received infection treatment and wound bed preparation during hospitalization; after discharge, patients in one of the campuses received routine outpatient wound care, and those treated in the other received continuous home wound care. The per-protocol analysis was performed to compare ulcer healing indicators, knowledge, health belief, self-management behaviour and medical expenses of the two groups.

RESULTS

Between October 2021 and December 2022, 116 patients were enrolled in the study; 107 completed. The home care was not inferior in terms of ulcer healing rate and demonstrated significant enhancements in the understanding of warning signs, health belief and self-management behaviour. Additionally, the home care saved 220.38 yuan (24.32 UK pounds) in direct medical expenses for each additional one square centimetre of ulcer healing.

CONCLUSION

The continuous home wound care enhanced self-management behaviour of the patients and saved their medical expenses while not compromising ulcer healing.

IMPACT

This is to date the first study to conduct continuous home wound care practice for patients with DFUs and confirmed its safety and non-inferiority in ulcer healing, and supported its superiority in improving self-management behaviour and saving medical expenses.

REPORTING METHOD

We have adhered to the transparent reporting of evaluations with nonrandomized designs statements and the corresponding checklist was followed.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The patients and their primary caregivers were involved in intervention design, we received input from them about the factors that facilitate and hinder patient self-management behaviours to develop intervention strategies.

Level of and factors associated with foot self-care among people with diabetes in Idlib Province of Northwest Syria: A cross-sectional study

Background and aims

Diabetic foot and lower limb problems are among the most neglected complications during the Syrian armed conflict due to the absence of a functioning health infrastructure, including early detection and timely management of limb-threatening wounds. This study aimed to determine self-reported diabetes-related foot disease (DRFD), adherence to recommended foot self-care (FSC) practices, and associated factors among people with diabetes in war-torn Northwest Syria (NWS).

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted at six primary care clinics in Idlib, NWS, between March 27 and April 17, 2022, utilizing the validated interviewer-administered Diabetes Foot Disease and Foot Care Questionnaire. Data on demographic characteristics, DRFD, and FSC practices were collected. FSC score was determined by adding the points from all 12 FSC items, with a maximum score of 48, and were categorized into very poor (≤12), poor (13-24), moderate (25-36), and good (37-48). A convenience sample of 331 consecutive Syrians, aged ≥18 years, with diabetes, were invited. Multiple linear regression was used to identify variables associated with FSC practices.

Results

A total of 328 patients completed the questionnaire (response rate: 99.1%). The overall FSC score was average (mean total score 27.24, SD 7.03). Over one-third (37.8%) had a very poor/poor score, 50.3% had an average score, and 11.9% had a good score. Household income/month of ≥51 USD (β = 2.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]:1.06-4.1, p = 0.001) and diabetes duration of ≥10 years (β = 1.8, 95% Cl: 0.2-3.4, p = 0.027) significantly predicted better FSC practice.

Conclusion

A significant proportion of participants had inadequate adoption FSC behaviors. Higher socioeconomic status was associated with better FSC practices. Future research should evaluate diabetic foot education and professional foot care in this population.

Classification of foot ulcers in people with diabetes: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Classification and scoring systems can help both clinical management and audit the outcomes of routine care.

AIM

This study aimed to assess published systems used to characterise ulcers in people with diabetes to determine which should be recommended to (a) aid communication between health professionals, (b) predict clinical outcome of individual ulcers, (c) characterise people with infection and/or peripheral arterial disease, and (d) audit to compare outcomes in different populations. This systematic review is part of the process of developing the 2023 guidelines to classify foot ulcers from the International Working Group on Diabetic Foot.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for articles published up to December 2021 which evaluated the association, accuracy or reliability of systems used to classify ulcers in people with diabetes. Published classifications had to have been validated in populations of >80% of people with diabetes and a foot ulcer.

RESULTS

We found 28 systems addressed in 149 studies. Overall, the certainty of the evidence for each classification was low or very low, with 19 (68%) of the classifications being assessed by ≤ 3 studies. The most frequently validated system was the one from Meggitt-Wagner, but the articles validating this system focused mainly on the association between the different grades and amputation. Clinical outcomes were not standardized but included ulcer-free survival, ulcer healing, hospitalisation, limb amputation, mortality, and cost.

CONCLUSION

Despite the limitations, this systematic review provided sufficient evidence to support recommendations on the use of six particular systems in specific clinical scenarios.

Use of the SINBAD score as a predicting tool for major adverse foot events in patients with diabetic foot ulcer: A French multicentre study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship between the site, ischaemia, neuropathy, bacterial infection, area, depth (SINBAD) score and major adverse foot events in patients with diabetes and foot ulcers.

METHODS

For this retrospective ancillary study, patients (n = 537) followed for a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) in six French hospitals were included between 1 February 2019 and 17 March 2019, and between 1 February 2020 and 17 March 2020. The SINBAD score was assessed at inclusion. The frequency of a composite outcome consisting of eight major adverse foot events (MAFE) was assessed after 5-6 months of follow-up: hospitalisation for DFU, septic surgery, revascularisation, minor amputation, major amputation, death, secondary infection and ulcer recurrence. A logistical regression explored the link between the SINBAD score and MAFE and each of its component.

RESULTS

A low SINBAD score (from 0 to 3) was observed in 61% of patients and a high (from 4 to 6) in 39%. MAFE occurred in, respectively, 24% and 28% of these patients. Multivariate analyses showed a significant relationship between the SINBAD score and MAFE, with the continuous SINBAD score: odds ratio (OR) 1.72 [95% CI (1.51-1.97)] or dichotomic SINBAD score (values: 0-3 and 4-6): OR 3.71 [95% CI (2.54-5.42)]. The SINBAD score (continuous or dichotomic) at inclusion was also significantly associated with six out of the eight components of the MAFE.

CONCLUSIONS

The SINBAD score is a useful tool for predicting major adverse foot events.

The Validity and Reliability of the SINBAD Classification System for Diabetic Foot Ulcers

ABSTRACT

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a serious and costly complication of diabetes mellitus with a global prevalence of 6.3% and cost of £8,800 per unhealed DFU in the National Health Service. The three main types of DFU are neuropathic, ischemic, and neuroischemic, with an estimated prevalence of 35%, 15%, and 50%, respectively. Because 85% of lower-limb amputations in patients with diabetes are preceded by a DFU, the task of reducing the current and future burden of DFUs on an international level is of crucial importance. Classification of a DFU is an important and complex process with many independent variables that influence the wound severity. Correct classification of a DFU is important to prevent deterioration in the short term and lower-limb amputation in the long term. Both the accuracy of the clinician's interpretation of categorical data from a classification model and grasp of contextual risk factors can refine diagnoses. The term SINBAD is an acronym for six independent variables: site, ischemia, neuropathy, bacterial infection, area, and depth. This system uses comprehensive parameters with strict criteria to facilitate quick and accurate clinical decisions to prevent lower-limb amputation. In addition to providing quantitative measurement, SINBAD also spotlights the multifaceted characteristics of DFUs. By evaluating the validity and reliability of the SINBAD classification system, its applicability for the assessment of DFUs and prevention of lower-limb amputation can be better understood.

Effectiveness of continuous home wound care on wound healing, self-management behavior, and medical expenses of patients with diabetic foot ulcers

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effectiveness of continuous home wound care on wound healing, self-management behavior, and medical expenses of patients with diabetic foot ulcers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were grouped by the campuses they were hospitalized. One group received home wound care, and the other one received outpatient wound care after their discharge. Non-inferiority testing was performed to compare ulcer healing. Their Diabetes-related Foot Ulcer Self-Management Behavior Scale (DFUSMBS) scores and medical expenses were compared.

RESULTS

Between October 2021 and December 2022, fifty-five patients in the home wound care group and fifty-two in the outpatient wound care group completed the study. The home wound care was non-inferior concerning ulcer complete healing rate in total or stratified by Wagner grade or baseline ulcer area. Concerning wound healing time, the home wound care group was inferior for Wagner Grade Ⅲ ulcers (hazard ratio = 0.7772, 95 % CI = 0.2799-2.1581). In contrast, for ulcers with baseline area>5 cm2, the home care group was non-inferior and even can be superior, although the superiority was not statistically significant (Log-rank X2 = 0.257, p = 0.612). Moreover, the home wound care group showed significant improvement concerning timely wound treatment (t = 23.045, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 4.460, Effect Size = 0.912) and wound care behavior (t = 33.410, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 6.454, Effect Size = 0.955), while that of diabetes self-management was not statistically significant (t = -0.673, p = 0.502, Cohen's d = 0.128, Effect Size = 0.064). The medium direct medical expense per capita of the patients in the outpatient care group was statistically significantly heavier than that of the home wound care group (Z = -6.877, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The home wound care practice did not compromise ulcer healing, enhanced timely wound treatment and wound care behavior of the patients, and saved their medical expenses, hopefully providing a feasible wound care alternative with economic benefits for the physically and economically devastated patients.

Effectiveness of Topical Sucralfate in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: An Open-Labeled Randomized Study

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a major cause of lower limb amputations. Many treatment recommendations have been proposed. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of topical sucralfate when combined with mupirocin ointment, in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer in comparison to topical mupirocin alone, in terms of healing rates.

METHODS

This open-labeled randomized study was conducted on 108 patients to evaluate the effectiveness of topical sucralfate and mupirocin combination, compared to topical mupirocin alone. The patients were administered the same parenteral antibiotic, and wounds were subjected to daily dressing. The healing rates (determined by the percentage reduction in wound area) in the two groups were calculated. The mean healing rates in both groups were expressed in percentage and compared using the Student's t-test.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients were included in the study. Male-to-female ratio was 3:1. The incidence of diabetic foot was the highest (50.9%) in the age group of 50-59 years. The mean age of the study population was 51 years. The incidence of diabetic foot ulcers was highest in the months of July-August (42%). A total of 71.2% patients had random blood sugar levels between 150-200 mg/dL, and 72.2% patients had diabetes for five to 10 years. The mean±standard deviation (SD) of the healing rates in the sucralfate and mupirocin combination group and the control group were 16.2±7.3% and 14.5±6.6%, respectively. Comparison of the means by Student's t-test failed to show a statistical difference in healing rates between the two groups (p=0.201).

CONCLUSION

We concluded that the addition of topical sucralfate does not show any obvious benefits in terms of healing rates in diabetic foot ulcers as compared to mupirocin alone.

The war in Ukraine and diabetic foot care: Challenges, recommendations

AIMS

A number of reports have illustrated the barriers that the war in Ukraine puts to diabetes care. While their recommendations are valuable for glycemic control and the prevention or early detection of life - threatening diabetes complications, such as hypoglycemia and ketoacidosis, the discourse on diabetic foot is limited. This letter emphasizes the implications of the war in diabetic foot care and discusses potential solutions.

METHODS

The authors searched peer - reviewed and grey literature to identify records related to the prevalence of diabetic foot in Ukraine and the standards of care before and after the invasion of Ukraine.

RESULTS

Thousands of people in Ukraine sustain diabetic foot ulcers and, thus, are at high risk for lower limb amputations due to the limited access to healthcare services in the country. If not addressed, disability associated with chronic ulcers and amputations can severely affect individual and public health in Ukraine. Strengthening primary and remote care, educating people on self - care and providing adequate supplies for the management of diabetic foot have a major potential to prevent amputations, disability and death.

CONCLUSIONS

Providing adequate diabetic foot care in Ukraine and other regions tormented by armed conflicts is vital for the health of the local population and the potential of the affected countries to recover after the crisis.