Factors affecting the incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers in COVID-19 patients admitted with a Braden scale below 14 in the intensive care unit: Retrospective cohort study

Pressure ulcers during the COVID-19 pandemic in intensive care:A multicenter cohort study

AIM

The objective of the present study is twofold: to describe the prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers (PUs) among ICU patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to identify the risk factors associated with the development of PUs in this cohort of ICU patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of adult critical care patients admitted in two general ICUs of two different countries (Sweden and Portugal) between March 1st, 2020, and April 30th, 2021, through the analysis of the electronic health record database. The prevalence and incidence were calculated, and a multivariate logistic-regression model was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs), of possible risk factors of PU development.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 1717 patients. The overall prevalence of PU was 15.3 %, and the incidence of ICU-acquired PUs was 14.1 %. Most of the pressure ulcers documented in this study were at the anterior part of the body (45.35 %) and regarding classification, Category 2 (38.40 %) and Category 3 (22.71 %) pressure ulcers together accounted for over fifty percent of the cases recorded. In the multivariate logistic regression model for PU, age, having COVID-19 (OR = 1.58, 95 % CI: 1.20-2.09), use of mechanical ventilation (OR = 1.49, 95 % CI: 1.13 = 1.97), use of vasopressors (OR = 1.31, 95 % CI: 1.00-1.70), having a Braden risk score ≤16 at admission (OR = 1.63; 95 % CI: 1.04-2.56), and length of stay (LOS) (OR = 1.43, 95 % CI 1.03-2.00 if LOS 90-260 h, OR = 2.34, 95 % CI: 1.63-3.35 if LOS >260 h) were associated with the likelihood of developing an ICU-acquired PUs.

CONCLUSION

When adjusted for covariates patients with COVID-19 had a higher risk for PU development during the ICU stay compared to patients without COVID-19. Health care personnel in ICU may consider incorporating COVID-19, age, use of mechanical ventilation, vasopressors and estimated LOS in addition to a comprehensive risk assessment including both a risk score and clinical assessment.

Hospital-acquired pressure injury prevention in people with a BMI of 30.0 or higher: A scoping review

AIM(S)

To: (1) explore current best practices for hospital-acquired pressure injury prevention in high BMI patients; (2) summarize nurses' experiences in preventing and managing them; (3) explore the association between a high BMI and occurrence and severity of pressure injury.

DESIGN

Exploratory.

METHODS

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, JBI Evidence Synthesis, Scopus, Embase, clinical registries and grey literature (search dates: January 2009 to May 2021).

RESULTS

Overall, 1479 studies were screened. The included studies were published between 2010 and 2022. Five interventional studies and 32 best practice recommendations (Objective 1) reported low-quality evidence. Findings of thematic analysis reported in nine studies (Objective 2) identified nurses' issues as insufficient bariatric equipment, inadequate staffing, weight bias, fatigue, obese-related terminology issues, ethical dilemmas and insufficient staff education in high BMI patients' pressure injury prevention. No association between hospital-acquired pressure injury occurrence and high BMI were reported by 18 out of 28 included studies (Objective 3).

CONCLUSION

Quality of evidence was low for the interventional studies and best practice recommendations.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

Current (2019) International Pressure Injury Guideline to be used despite the low quality of evidence of most best practice recommendations.

IMPACT STATEMENT

This study addressed hospital-acquired pressure injury prevention in high BMI patients. Greater proportion of studies in this review found no association between high BMI and occurrence of hospital-acquired pressure injury. Nurses need educational interventions on pressure injury prevention in high body mass index people, sufficient staffing for repositioning and improved availability of bariatric equipment.

REPORTING METHOD

We adhered to relevant EQUATOR guidelines, PRISMA extension for scoping reviews.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER CONTRIBUTE TO THE WIDER GLOBAL CLINICAL COMMUNITY?: Larger clinical trials are needed on repositioning frequency, support surfaces, prophylactic dressings and risk assessment tools to inform clinical practice guidelines on pressure injury prevention in high BMI people.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

Wound Practice and Research (https://doi.org/10.33235/wpr.29.3.133-139).

Inpatient Rehabilitation Issues Related to COVID-19

Patients who are hospitalized due to COVID-19 are predisposed to requiring acute inpatient rehabilitation. Multiple factors have posed challenges to inpatient rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic, such as staff shortages, restrictions with therapy, and barriers to discharge. Despite these challenges, data have shown that inpatient rehabilitation plays a key role in functional gains for this patient population. There remains a need for more data on the current challenges that are faced in the inpatient rehabilitation setting, as well as better understanding of long-term functional outcomes following COVID-19.

The PRINCOVID Retrospective Study: A Predictive Model of Pressure Injuries for Critical COVID-19 Patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to characterize pressure injuries, identify risk factors, and develop a predictive model for pressure injuries at intensive care unit admission for critical COVID-19 patients.

DESIGN

This study was a retrospective analysis of a consecutive sample of patients admitted to intensive care unit between May 2020 and September 2021. Inclusion criteria encompassed the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome due to SARS-CoV-2, requiring invasive mechanical ventilation more than 48 hrs. The following predictors were evaluated: sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, as well as clinical and laboratory findings at intensive care unit admission. The primary outcome was the presence of pressure injuries.

RESULTS

Two hundred five patients were included, mostly males (73%) with a mean age of 62 yrs. Pressure injury prevalence was 58%. On multivariable analysis, male sex, hypertension, hemoglobin, and albumin at intensive care unit admission were independently associated with pressure injuries, constituting the PRINCOVID model. The model reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.71, surpassing the Braden scale ( P = 0.0015). The PRINCOVID score ranges from 0 to 15, with two risk groups: "at risk"(≤7 points) and "high risk"(>7 points).

CONCLUSIONS

This study proposes PRINCOVID as a multivariable model for developing pressure injuries in critical COVID-19 patients. Based on four parameters (sex, hypertension, hemoglobin, and albumin at intensive care unit admission), this model fairly predicts the development of pressure injuries. The PRINCOVID score allows patients' classification into two groups, facilitating early identification of high-risk patients.

Outcomes-Based Standardization: A New Approach to An Old Problem

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly strained care delivery, reduced available resources, and further destabilized health care finances. As health care organizations emerge from a pandemic that has worsened uncontrolled health care spending, while greatly reducing patient volumes and revenue, reactive cost cutting with little regard for the people at the end of those decisions quickly emerged as the standard approach. Historically, limiting cost decisions to product selection was a common, yet minimally effective, strategy for controlling health care spending. In the post-COVID health care environment, where clinical and financial challenges are greater than ever, a new approach to reducing health care spending offers promise. Outcomes-based standardization is an approach that begins with the end in mind, incorporating lean concepts to alleviate redundant or ineffective products and practice, while prioritizing value added activities to catalyze the greatest reduction of harm, time, and money spent. Outcomes-based standardization is a framework for change that balances clinical and financial decisions to ensure high value care across the continuum. This new approach has been employed across the country to help health care organizations reduce health care spending. This article explains what it is, why it works, and how the reader can successfully deploy it across the health care spectrum to achieve better clinical outcomes, alleviate waste, and reduce unnecessary health care spending.

The prevalence and risk factors of facial pressure injuries related to adult non-invasive ventilation equipment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

To systematically assess the prevalence of facial pressure injuries related to adult non-invasive ventilation equipment, and risk factors of facial pressure injuries. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Database and Weipu Database were comprehensively searched for observational studies investigating the prevalence and risk factors of facial pressure injuries related to adult non-invasive ventilation equipment from inception to May 16th, 2022. Filter articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of the included studies was evaluated independently by two investigators. Meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 16.0 software package. In total, 2835 articles were screened and data from 12 studies were used in meta-analysis. The prevalence of facial pressure injuries related to adult non-invasive ventilation equipment was 25% (95% confidence interval, CI:15% to 37%, I²  = 97.34%, P < 0.0001). After controlling for confounding variables, the following risk factors of facial pressure injuries: use equipment form, with diabetes, fever, cumulative time of using equipment, facial skin oedema and Glasgow score. Understanding the risk factors of facial pressure injuries can provide the healthcare personnel with the theoretical basis for the management and treatment of the patients.