Baboon syndrome resulting from systemic drugs: is there strife between SDRIFE and allergic contact dermatitis syndrome?

A rare long-term side effect of COVID-19 vaccines: Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema-like reaction SDRIFE and potential immunogens for delayed type hypersensitivity reactions

BACKGROUND

Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) is an important clinical entity that is rare and may develop with a Type IV delayed type hypersensitivity immune response to drug antigens. The incidence and characteristics of SDRIFE attributed to COronaVIrus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines remain unclear, this issue requires further elucidation.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to investigate the vaccine-related-SDRIFE and potential immunogens of COVID-19 vaccines through a literature review accompanied by a real case.

METHODS

A new vaccine related-SDRIFE case report and a literature review regarding COVID Vaccine related SDRIFE. In the years following the COVID vaccinations, all SDRIFE cases published between 2000 and 2024 were retrieved.

RESULTS

The new case of vaccine-related SDRIFE developed following the COVID-19 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and was tolerated without any issues with the CoronaVac vaccine (Sinovac Biotech.,China) after negative skin tests. A literature search has revealed fifteen different types of SDRIFE cases related to COVID-19 vaccines since 2020. Diagnostic skin testing with vaccine or any potentially immunogen parts of vaccine were performed in six patients. All tests were negative except for one late intradermal test positivity.

CONCLUSION

This mini review showed that SDRIFE due to COVID vaccines is a rare, but a significant adverse event that has a potential to impair patient compliance with subsequent vaccines. Identification and avoidance of potential allergens through standardized skin tests and diagnostic immunological work-up will contribute to vaccine compliance and better management of hypersensitivity reactions.

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: European expert consensus for diagnosis and management

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare, usually drug-induced, acute pustular rash. Despite the lack of strong data supporting the effectiveness of topical or systemic corticosteroids in this drug reaction, they are widely used. More generally, there is no consensus on the diagnostic modalities and the management of patients with AGEP. We aimed to provide European expert recommendations for the diagnosis and management or patients with AGEP. Members of the ToxiTEN group of the European Reference Network (ERN)-skin, all dermatologists and/or allergologists with expertise in drug reactions, elaborated these recommendations based on their own experience and on a review of the literature. Recommendations were separated into the following categories: professionals involved, assessment of the diagnosis of AGEP, management of the patient and allergological work-up after the acute phase. Consensus was obtained among experts for the list of professionals involved for the diagnosis and management of AGEP, including the minimum diagnostic work-up, the setting of management, the treatments, the modalities and the timing of allergological work-up and follow-up. European experts in drug allergies propose herein consensus on the diagnosis and management of patients with AGEP. A multidisciplinary approach is warranted, including dermatologists, allergologists and pharmacovigilance services.

Differential diagnosis of contact dermatitis: A practical-approach review by the EADV Task Force on contact dermatitis

The diagnosis of eczema ('dermatitis') is mostly clinical and depends on the clinical history and exploratory objective findings (primary lesions, patterns). Contact dermatitis remains as an important condition in the group of eczematous disorders, with important socioeconomic and occupational relevance. Although irritant and allergic contact dermatitis have a different pathogenesis, both are characterized by a rather typical morphology, are triggered by external factors and tend to occur primarily in the area of contact with the exogenous agent. In addition, allergic and irritant dermatitis may also co-exist. The importance of diagnosing contact dermatitis, especially when allergic in nature, is both due to the possibility of avoiding the trigger, and due to its role in aggravating other skin conditions. Nevertheless, the heterogeneity of clinical presentations in daily practice may pose an important challenge for the suspicion and correct diagnosis of contact dermatitis. Furthermore, other conditions, with different pathogenesis and treatment, may clinically simulate contact dermatitis. The Task Force aims to conduct a review of the unifying clinical features of contact dermatitis and characterize its main clinical phenotypes, and its simulators, in order to contribute to an early suspicion or recognition of contact dermatitis and enable a correct differential diagnosis.

Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema with high-risk systemic features: a unique clinical phenotype in hospitalized patients

Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) is classically considered a low-risk, self-limiting eruption lacking systemic manifestations and sparing facial and mucosal areas. We present 7 inpatients meeting diagnostic criteria for SDRIFE with concomitant systemic manifestations ± high-risk facial involvement acutely after antibiotic exposure (mean latency 6.71 days). These cases deviate from classic, self-limited SDRIFE and represent a unique phenotype of SDRIFE, characterized by coexisting extracutaneous manifestations. Onset of systemic stigmata coincided with or preceded cutaneous involvement in 4 and 3 patients, respectively. All patients developed peripheral eosinophilia and 6 patients had ≥ 2 extracutaneous systems involved. Facial involvement, a high-risk feature associated with severe cutaneous adverse reactions but atypical in classic SDRIFE, occurred in 4 cases. Patients had favorable clinical outcomes following drug cessation and treatment with 4-6 week corticosteroid tapers. We suggest that baseline labs be considered in hospitalized patients with antibiotic-induced SDRIFE. These patients may also necessitate systemic therapy given extracutaneous involvement, deviating from standard SDRIFE treatment with drug cessation alone.

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a heterogeneous field including various clinical patterns without specific features suggesting drug causality. Maculopapular exanthema and urticaria are the most common types of cutaneous ADR. Serious cutaneous ADRs, which may cause permanent sequelae or have fatal outcome, may represent 2% of all cutaneous ADR and must be quickly identified to guide their management. These serious reactions include bullous manifestations (epidermal necrolysis i.e. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Some risk factors for developing cutaneous ADRs have been identified, including immunosuppression, autoimmunity or genetic variants. All drugs can cause cutaneous ADRs, the most commonly implicated being antibiotics (especially aminopenicillins and sulfonamides), anticonvulsants, allopurinol, antineoplastic drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and iodinated contrast media. Pathophysiology is related to immediate or delayed "idiosyncratic" immunologic mechanisms, i.e., usually not related to dose, and pharmacologic/toxic mechanisms, commonly dose-dependent and/or time-dependent. If an immuno-allergic mechanism is suspected, allergological explorations (including epicutaneous patch testing and/or intradermal test) are often possible to clarify drug causality, however these have a variable sensitivity according to the drug and to the ADR type. No in vivo or in vitro test can consistently confirm the drug causality. To determine the origin of a rash, a logical approach based on clinical characteristics, chronologic factors and elimination of differential diagnosis (especially infectious etiologies) is required, completed with a literature search. Reporting to pharmacovigilance system is therefore essential both to analyze drug causality at individual level, and to contribute to knowledge of the drug at population level, especially for serious cutaneous ADRs or in cases involving newly marketed drugs.

Characterization of T-Helper Immune Phenotype in Symmetrical Drug-Related Intertriginous and Flexural Exanthema (SDRIFE) Endorses a Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Reaction

ABSTRACT

Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) is a cutaneous drug eruption with a characteristic distribution of erythema on the gluteal/inguinal region and intertriginous areas with unclear pathogenesis. In this study, we aimed to characterize the T-helper immune phenotype in SDRIFE in comparison with psoriasis and eczema to further the understanding of the pathophysiology and immune response of this rare disorder. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on 9 skin biopsies each from SDRIFE, psoriasis, and eczema using immunohistochemistry for CD3 and dual CD4/T-bet, CD4/GATA3, and CD4/RORC to quantify the percentage of Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells, respectively. A significant difference was detected in the average percentage of Th1 between all 3 groups with the highest percentage of Th1 cells seen in psoriasis, followed by SDRIFE and eczema. SDRIFE showed significantly lower Th2 expression as compared to both psoriasis and eczema. There was a trend towards a higher average percentage of Th17 in psoriasis and SDRIFE, and the ratio of Th17:Th2 was significantly higher in samples of SDRIFE compared with both eczema and psoriasis. The findings characterize SDRIFE as a Th1 and possibly Th17-driven process, which could inform future therapeutic options and substantiate the model of SDRIFE as a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction.

Everolimus-induced Symmetrical Drug-related Intertriginous and Flexural Exanthema

Abstract is missing (Short communication)

Attenuation of Human Growth Hormone-Induced Rash With Graded Dose Challenge

Adult growth hormone (GH) deficiency is rare and requires replacement with extrinsic/synthetic injection. GH hypersensitivity has been reported; specifically, atopic patients may develop rashes from somatotropin therapy. Allergic and non-allergic skin reactions to recombinant human GH are uncommon and infrequently reported. We describe a graded-dose challenge with intravenous Norditropin® in a 65-year-old atopic adult woman who developed a severe whole-body rash with Norditropin FlexPro® administration on several occasions but was negative on skin-prick testing to Norditropin® percutaneously and intradermally, but the patch testing was positive for gold and nickel.

The patient was registered as a direct admission to the emergency room at a university hospital for a rapid antigen coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) testing after having received two COVID-19 vaccinations and re-testing four months after vaccination. She was then directly admitted to a non-COVID-19 intensive care unit with direct bedside supervision by a registered nurse and a physician board certified in internal medicine, allergy/immunology, and pulmonary diseases. The patient brought a Norditropin® pen which our pharmacy team attached to a compatible syringe for dilutions. A graded dose challenge at a final dosage of 0.1 mL was performed and the patient was monitored for allergic and other adverse drug reactions, which did not occur. At the time of writing this case report, the patient has been maintained on Norditropin FlexPro® 0.1 mL and has not experienced any adverse reactions, including recurrent skin eruptions.

The case presented is the first to describe a patient who successfully tolerated a graded dose challenge of an adult patient to GH replacement therapy (as Norditropin®) under supervision in an intensive care unit, whereas prior to reporting of this case, a graded dose challenge to GH replacement therapy had only been successfully performed in a child using another formulation of somatotropin (Humatrope®). Hence, this case lends support that graded dose challenge with somatotropin analogs may be considered for patients with isolated GH deficiency such as in the case presented here.

First Report of Symmetrical Drug-related Intertriginous and Flexural Exanthema (SDRIFE or Baboon Syndrome) After Erenumab Application for Migraine Prevention

INTRODUCTION

Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE), formerly also called baboon syndrome, is characterized by symmetrical erythematous rash with typical localization in the gluteal and intertriginous areas. A type IV delayed hypersensitivity immune response is thought to be responsible for its development. CGRP monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) are a new class of drugs for the prevention of migraine. We present the first case of SDRIFE occurring in temporal relation to the use of erenumab for migraine prevention.

CASE

A 48-year-old female patient with migraine received erenumab 140 mg subcutaneously in the thigh area for the prevention of migraine in repetitive cycles, each 1 month apart. Initially, the patient experienced no side effects. After the third cycle, a masseuse incidentally noticed a reddish, circular rash in the buttock area during a back massage. There were no other symptoms. The skin changes resolved spontaneously. Two years later, approximately 40 h after reapplication of erenumab 140 mg, the patient experienced a severe pain in the buttock area centered over the anal crease. The area of pain extended in a circular pattern with approximately 20 cm in diameter. The pain started abruptly and reached a severe intensity within about 30 min. Sitting on the buttocks was no longer possible for the patient. There was marked allodynia and hyperpathia in the entire buttocks region. A flat, broad-based blister-like skin swelling developed in this region. The blisters began opening up on the fourth day after the onset of the skin reaction. In addition, there was a pronounced redness in the entire buttock area. Here, the patient felt a strong burning pain, similar to a scald.

RESULTS

The symptoms lasted for a period of 10 days. From this point on, they fully subsided under concomitant therapy with prednisolone.

CONCLUSION

SDRIFE as a rare dermatological side effect should be considered in the monitoring of skin lesions during migraine prophylaxis. In view of the high migraine prevalence, knowledge of this uncommon syndrome is important. It is crucial to recognize the relationship between the medication and the circumscribed exanthema occurring distant from the injection site.

A flexural exanthem following postexposure prophylaxis

We report a case of symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema following antiretroviral postexposure prophylactic medications, tenofovir and emtricitabine, commencement of which preceded the onset of the rash. Tenofovir and emtricitabine are both nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor medications, commonly used to prevent development of AIDS.

Allergic Contact Dermatitis From Topical Drugs: An Overview

ABSTRACT

Allergic contact dermatitis from topical drugs is frequent and is seen in 10% to 17% of patients patch tested for suspected contact dermatitis. More than 360 drugs have been implicated as contact allergens, of which-generally-antibiotics, corticosteroids, local anesthetics, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the most frequent culprits. This article provides an overview of allergic contact dermatitis to topical drugs, discussing their prevalence of sensitization, predisposing factors, clinical manifestations (both typical and atypical), the drugs described as allergens, cross-reactivity and coreactivity, and diagnostic procedures.

Systemic Contact Dermatitis: The Routes of Allergen Entry

Systemic contact dermatitis (SCD) is a generalized reactivation of type IV hypersensitivity skin diseases in individuals with previous sensitization after a contact allergen is administered systemically. Patients with SCD may consider their dermatitis unpredictable and recalcitrant since the causative allergens are difficult to find. If a patient has a pattern of dermatitis suggestive of SCD but fails to improve with conventional treatment, SCD should be taken into consideration. If doctors are not familiar with the presentations of SCD and the possible routes of allergen sensitization and exposure, the diagnosis of SCD may be delayed. In this work, we summarized all of the routes through which allergens can enter the body and cause SCD, including oral intake, local contact (through skin, inhalation, nasal spray and anal application), implants, and other iatrogenic or invasive routes (intravenous, intramuscular, intraarticular, and intravesicular). This will provide a comprehensive reference for the clinicians to identify the culprit of SCD.

Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema/baboon syndrome induced by traditional Chinese medicine

BACKGROUND

Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) refers to an uncommon cutaneous adverse reaction that symmetrically involves the buttock and intertriginous areas after systemic exposure to the offending drug and is previously known as baboon syndrome. SDRIFE related with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has not been reported.

OBJECTIVE

We presented a case of SDRIFE /baboon syndrome induced by TCM, Xi-Huang capsule.

METHODS

A 57-years-old man presented with macular erythematous rash mainly on his intergluteal, inguinal, axillary, popliteal regions for a duration of 5 days. The lesions appeared a day after an oral Chinese patent medicine Xi-Huang capsule for arthralgia. Drug eruption was diagnosed. The rash disappeared completely within a week with immediate discontinuation of Xi-Huang capsule and a short term of systemic therapy with glucocorticosteroids. Patch testing was performed on the patient 1 month after complete resolution. He was patch tested with Xi-Huang capsule (5% and 10% in petroleum) using Finn Chambers on Scanpor tape and T.R.U.E. test system. Five heathy volunteers were also patch tested with the same Xi-Huang capsule.

RESULTS

Patch testing to 20 common contact allergens including nickel and fragrance were negative. TCM patch test was positive. No positive results were found in five volunteers. Months later, the patient relapsed after an oral herbal Chinese medicine challenge for arthralgia. To avoid the rash recurrence, he stopped taking any Chinese herbal medicine and had complete resolution of disease.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese patent drugs for external and oral have unique advantages and have been widely used in many diseases. It is important that dermatologists monitor for clinically significant manifestations of TCM, such as baboon syndrome. Patch testing could help make a definitive diagnosis.

Symmetric drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema: Clinicopathologic study of 19 cases and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Symmetric drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) is a cutaneous drug reaction characterized by gluteal/anogenital erythema and symmetric involvement of other intertriginous location(s) without systemic signs. Clinicopathologic characterization has been limited to case reports and small series. We describe 19 new cases and review the literature to better define the clinical and histopathologic spectrum of SDRIFE.

METHODS

Pathology archives were searched for "SDRIFE" and "baboon syndrome." Cases meeting clinical criteria were included. Clinical and histopathologic features were recorded. Previous reports of SDRIFE with histopathologic descriptions were reviewed.

RESULTS

Nineteen new cases were included, over half triggered by antibiotics. Six new causative medications were identified. Median onset was 7 days. Typical lesions were erythematous plaques or papules with or without scale. The most common histopathologic finding was superficial perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate followed by dermal eosinophils, spongiosis, and orthokeratosis. Basal vacuolization and apoptotic keratinocytes were less common. Interstitial histiocytes were present in almost half of our cases. Other findings included atypical lymphocytes and "flame figure."

CONCLUSIONS

Appreciation of the range of inciting medications and clinicopathologic features in SDRIFE will improve recognition of this condition. Although many histopathologic features overlap with other common dermatitides, biopsy may assist in excluding key clinical mimics.

Nickel Allergy: Epidemiology, Pathomechanism, Clinical Patterns, Treatment and Prevention Programs

Nickel is the most common cause of contact allergy in the general population and the most frequently detected allergen in patients patch tested for suspected allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). ACD from nickel is a typical type IV hypersensitivity. Nickel allergy is mostly caused by nonoccupational exposure, such as jewelry and clothing decorations, metal tools, medical devices (mainly orthopedic and orthodontic implants, cardiovascular prosthesis), eyeglasses, utensils, keys, pigment for paint, cosmetics, and food (mainly legumes, chocolate, salmon, peanuts). Occupational exposure can involve several workers (mechanics, metalworkers, platers, hairdressers, jewelers, workers in the constructions and electronic industries), classically involving hands and forearms. The classic clinical pattern of ACD caused by nickel is characterized by eczematous dermatitis involving the sites of direct contact with the metal. Non-eczematous-patterns are reported, including lichenoid dermatitis, granuloma annulare, vitiligo-like lesions, dyshidrosiform dermatitis, and vasculitis. In the case of systemic exposure to nickel, sensitized patients could develop systemic contact dermatitis. Patch testing represents the gold standard for the diagnosis of ACD from nickel. Treatment includes avoidance of contact with products containing nickel and the patient's education about the possible use of alternative products. A recent EU nickel directive, regulating the content and release of nickel from products, has caused a decrease of nickel contact allergy in some European countries. Nickel allergy is a relevant issue of public health with significant personal, social, and economic impact. This review summarizes epidemiology, pathomechanism, clinical patterns, treatment, and prevention programs.

Contact dermatitis

Contact dermatitis (CD) is among the most common inflammatory dermatological conditions and includes allergic CD, photoallergic CD, irritant CD, photoirritant CD (also called phototoxic CD) and protein CD. Occupational CD can be of any type and is the most prevalent occupational skin disease. Each CD type is characterized by different immunological mechanisms and/or requisite exposures. Clinical manifestations of CD vary widely and multiple subtypes may occur simultaneously. The diagnosis relies on clinical presentation, thorough exposure assessment and evaluation with techniques such as patch testing and skin-prick testing. Management is based on patient education, avoidance strategies of specific substances, and topical treatments; in severe or recalcitrant cases, which can negatively affect the quality of life of patients, systemic medications may be needed.

Eczematous Drug Eruptions

Eczematous drug eruptions are a heterogenous group of skin reactions that resemble eczema both clinically and histologically. We reviewed the literature and cataloged the systemically administered medications that cause these eruptions, along with their characteristic clinical presentations. We identified three primary pathophysiologic etiologies: (1) cutaneous immunomodulation, (2) skin dehydration, and (3) delayed hypersensitivity. Notably, eczematous eruptions caused by altered immunity in the skin may be increasing in incidence as some responsible drugs, in particular biologic therapies (such as tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-17 inhibitors) and targeted cancer treatments (including immune checkpoint inhibitors and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors), become more commonly employed in clinical practice. Other notable causes of eczematous eruptions include antiviral agents for hepatitis C virus and cardiovascular medications in elderly individuals, and notable subtypes of eczematous reactions include systemic contact dermatitis and photoallergic reactions, which are also discussed. The diagnostic gold standard is drug rechallenge and most reactions may be treated effectively with emollients, topical corticosteroids, and oral antihistamines.

Treating Through Drug-Associated Exanthems in Drug Allergy Management: Current Evidence and Clinical Aspects

In the setting of an acute cutaneous adverse drug reaction there is increasing interest in selected phenotypes and hosts to continue drug therapy, especially in settings in which there are limited therapeutic options. This concept of "treating through," defined as the continued use of a drug in the setting of, in particular maculopapular exanthema, potentially avoids unnecessary drug discontinuation. A review of the recent literature, historical viewpoints, and expert opinion are provided within to form recommendations and algorithms for a "treating-through" approach.

Histopathological Spectrum and Immunophenotypic Characterization of Symmetrical Drug-Related Intertriginous and Flexural Exanthema

INTRODUCTION

Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) is a clinically very well-defined drug eruption, but the histopathological findings are still considered to be nonspecific.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the histopathological and immunophenotypical features of SDRIFE.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study that identified 11 biopsies from 9 patients with SDRIFE. The histopathological features were analyzed in conjunction with the immunohistochemical findings.

RESULTS

The most common histopathological feature was basal cell vacuolization, which was often associated with necrotic keratinocytes and focal spongiosis. TIA1+ T cells and neutrophils were frequently detected in the epidermis and at the dermoepidermal junction. The dermal inflammatory infiltrate was mixed, consisting of CD3+ T cells, macrophages, granulocytes, low numbers of CD20+ B cells, and plasma cells. A combination of histopathological patterns was observed in 5 cases. The most frequent combined histopathological patterns were interface dermatitis, spongiotic dermatitis, and psoriasiform dermatitis. Other histopathological patterns found in different combinations were pustular dermatitis, perivascular and interstitial neutrophilic dermatitis, and interstitial granulomatous dermatitis. In the other 4 cases, a single histopathological pattern predominated, such as psoriasiform dermatitis, vacuolar interface dermatitis of erythema multiforme-like type, or superficial and deep perivascular and interstitial dermatitis with eosinophils and neutrophils.

CONCLUSIONS

SDRIFE is characterized histologically by a vacuolar interface dermatitis induced by cytotoxic T lymphocytes and neutrophilic granulocytes. This pattern may be obscured by accompanying spongiotic, psoriasiform, or pustular features combined with a mixed superficial and sometimes deep dermal infiltrate.

First report of tamoxifen-induced baboon syndrome

Background

Baboon syndrome is a rare, type IV hypersensitivity reaction causing a maculopapular rash. Tamoxifen is an antineoplastic agent, working as an estrogen receptor antagonist, also called a selective estrogen receptor modulator. A variety of rashes were reported with Tamoxifen use to‐date except baboon syndrome. The Tamoxifen‐induced baboon syndrome seems to be reversible, as discontinuation of the drug improves clinical outcomes.

Aim

Herein, we present the first case of Tamoxifen‐induced baboon syndrome which occurred 8 years after initiation of Tamoxifen use.

Patients

A 44‐year‐old woman presented with papulovesicular eruption on her body and erythema on her face for a duration of 6 months. There was no evidence of ocular or mucosal involvement. She was diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with tamoxifen 10 mg twice daily over the past 8 years. She was not taking other medications or over‐the‐counter supplements at the time of presentation. The patient underwent urgent skin biopsies of two lesions on her buttock and thigh. No organisms were seen on Gram stain. The patient's skin biopsy revealed extensive hyperorthokeratosis, minimal parakeratosis, hypergranulosis, and lichenoid interface dermatitis in the irregularly acanthotic epidermis supporting diagnosis of fixed drug eruption. Following a multidisciplinary discussion, the patient was diagnosed with baboon syndrome or symmetrical drug‐related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) associated with Tamoxifen.

Results

Hence, Tamoxifen was immediately discontinued and treated with oral steroid along with topical agents. She showed improvement of clinical abnormalities within days after discontinuation of Tamoxifen.

Conclusions

Given the widespread use of Tamoxifen in the management of patients with breast cancer, it is important that healthcare professionals monitor for rare, however clinically significant, and potentially life‐threatening dermatological manifestations of Tamoxifen use, such as baboon syndrome.

Predominant patterns of β-lactam hypersensitivity in a single German Allergy Center: exanthem induced by aminopenicillins, anaphylaxis by cephalosporins

Background

Penicillins and other β-lactam antibiotics are the most common elicitors of allergic drug reaction. However, data on the pattern of clinical reaction types elicited by specific β-lactams are scarce and inconsistent. We aimed to determine patterns of β-latam allergy, i.e. the association of a clinical reaction type with a specific β-lactam antibiotic.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated data from 800 consecutive patients with suspected β-lactam hypersensitivity over a period of 11 years in a single German Allergy Center.

Results

β-lactam hypersensitivity was definitely excluded in 595 patients, immediate-type (presumably IgE-mediated) hypersensitivity was diagnosed in 70 and delayed-type hypersensitivity in 135 cases. Most (59 out of 70, 84.3%) immediate-type anaphylactic reactions were induced by a limited number of cephalosporins. Delayed reactions were regularly caused by an aminopenicillin (127 out of 135, 94.1%) and usually manifested as a measles-like exanthem (117 out of 135, 86.7%). Intradermal testing proved to be the most useful method for diagnosing β-lactam allergy, but prick testing was already positive in 24 out of 70 patients with immediate-type hypersensitivity (34.3%). Patch testing in addition to intradermal testing did not provide additional information for the diagnosis of delayed-type hypersensitivity. Almost all β-lactam allergic patients tolerated at least one, usually several alternative substances out of the β-lactam group.

Conclusions

We identified two patterns of β-lactam hypersensitivity: aminopenicillin-induced exanthem and anaphylaxis triggered by certain cephalosporins. Intradermal skin testing was the most useful method to detect both IgE-mediated and delayed-type β-lactam hypersensitivity.