An international registry to compare quotidian dialysis regimens with conventional thrice-weekly hemodialysis: why, how, and potential pitfalls

Intensive hemodialysis associates with improved survival compared with conventional hemodialysis

Patients undergoing conventional maintenance hemodialysis typically receive three sessions per week, each lasting 2.5-5.5 hours. Recently, the use of more intensive hemodialysis (>5.5 hours, three to seven times per week) has increased, but the effects of these regimens on survival are uncertain. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine whether intensive hemodialysis associates with better survival than conventional hemodialysis. We identified 420 patients in the International Quotidian Dialysis Registry who received intensive home hemodialysis in France, the United States, and Canada between January 2000 and August 2010. We matched 338 of these patients to 1388 patients in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study who received in-center conventional hemodialysis during the same time period by country, ESRD duration, and propensity score. The intensive hemodialysis group received a mean (SD) 4.8 (1.1) sessions per week with a mean treatment time of 7.4 (0.87) hours per session; the conventional group received three sessions per week with a mean treatment time of 3.9 (0.32) hours per session. During 3008 patient-years of follow-up, 45 (13%) of 338 patients receiving intensive hemodialysis died compared with 293 (21%) of 1388 patients receiving conventional hemodialysis (6.1 versus 10.5 deaths per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.87]). The strength and direction of the observed association between intensive hemodialysis and improved survival were consistent across all prespecified subgroups and sensitivity analyses. In conclusion, there is a strong association between intensive home hemodialysis and improved survival, but whether this relationship is causal remains unknown.

Nocturnal hemodialysis: effects on solute clearance, quality of life, and patient survival

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Conventional hemodialysis is often an incomplete treatment for uremia. People receiving hemodialysis often report a poor quality of life and suffer from an accelerated mortality rate. Nocturnal hemodialysis provides long treatments at night in the home or dialysis center. This review will examine how long nocturnal treatments have impact on the clearance of small and larger retention products, and how these treatments influence quality of life and survival.

RECENT FINDINGS

Nocturnal hemodialysis is more effective at clearing most small and middle molecule retention products, and has been associated with improvements in quality of life, especially in those domains related to the effects of kidney disease. Survival on nocturnal hemodialysis is higher than expected, and studies suggest that patients receiving nocturnal hemodialysis have a mortality rate that is about one third of what is seen in similar patients receiving conventional hemodialysis.

SUMMARY

Although impressive, it is difficult to be sure how much of the results of these studies is due to the duration and timing of dialysis and how much relates to patient level factors and residual confounding, and further research in this area is required.

Utilization and outcome of 'out-of-center hemodialysis' in the United States: a contemporary analysis

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in the delivery of out-of-center hemodialysis (HD), particularly in the home setting, but little systematic information about its use and outcome in contemporary incident patients is available.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Out-of-center HD was defined as HD delivered in a residential setting, mainly at home or in a long-term care facility (such as a nursing home) irrespective of the length and frequency of therapy. All-cause mortality was determined in an observational cohort study of 458,329 adult patients initiating dialysis in the United States with Medicare as a primary payer.

RESULTS

Between 1995 and 2004, out-of-center HD was the initial modality in 1,641 (0.4%) of eligible participants, although there was significant geographic variation. Patients initiating out-of-center HD were younger, more likely to be nonwhite, had fewer comorbidities, a higher median income, and were more likely to be employed than patients initiating in-center HD or peritoneal dialysis (PD). In multivariate analysis, out-of-center HD patients had a higher overall risk of death compared to in-center HD or PD patients (HR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.04, 1.17), although the relative risk of death was lower in younger and healthier patients (HR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.61, 1.00).

CONCLUSION

Out-of-center HD is not associated with a survival advantage among unselected patients initiating dialysis in the United States. These results call for better characterization of out-of-center HD in national registries, primarily to effectively compare the use, outcomes and potential benefits of home HD to standard therapies.

International Quotidian Dialysis Registry: annual report 2009

The International Quotidian Dialysis Registry (IQDR) is a global initiative designed to study practices and outcomes associated with the use of hemodialysis regimens of increased frequency and/or duration. Several small studies suggest that compared with conventional hemodialysis (HD), short-daily, nocturnal, and long conventional HD regimens may improve surrogate endpoints and quality of life. However, methodologically robust comparisons on hard outcomes are sorely lacking. The IQDR represents the first-ever attempt to aggregate long-term follow-up data from centers utilizing alternative HD regimens worldwide, and will have adequate statistical power to examine the effects of these regimens on multiple clinical endpoints, including mortality. To date, the IQDR has enrolled patients from Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand, with plans in place to begin linking with additional commercial databases and national registries. This fifth annual report of the IQDR describes (1) a proposed governance structure that will facilitate international collaboration, stakeholder input and funding; (2) data sources and participating registries; (3) recruitment to date and patient baseline characteristics; and (4) an agenda for future research.

The International Quotidian Dialysis Registry: annual report 2007

In view of the need to study both intermediate and definitive outcomes associated with daily and extended-hours hemodialysis (HD), our group has undertaken the design and implementation of an international registry to collect data describing the treatments and outcomes of patients treated with these regimens. The International Quotidian Dialysis Registry began recruiting patients in June 2004. There are currently 229 patients enrolled in the registry, up from 199 last year. The projected growth is 2000 patients by 2008. This paper constitutes the third annual report of progress of patient and center recruitment, and includes descriptive data drawn from the 3 primary patient groups currently tracked by the registry: home nocturnal, home short-daily, and in-center short-daily HD. As the cohort grows, patients will be compared with control subjects drawn from their respective national registries, and comparative analyses will follow.

The International Quotidian Dialysis Registry: annual report 2006

Interest in short daily and nocturnal hemodialysis (HD) regimens continues to grow worldwide. Despite growing optimism that these therapies will afford better patient outcomes over conventional HD, the current literature has not been viewed as sufficiently compelling to affect widespread implementation in most jurisdictions. Before these therapies can gain wider acceptance, larger and more rigorous studies will likely be needed. In June 2004, the Quotidian Dialysis Registry, based at the Lawson Health Research Institute at the University of Western Ontario, Canada, began recruiting patients across North America. By using an Internet-based data entry platform, patients from various centers worldwide will eventually be recruited, and studied prospectively. This paper constitutes the second annual update on patient and center recruitment, patient and treatment characteristics, and future directions for the registry.

The International Quotidian Dialysis Registry: Annual report 2005

The International Quotidian Dialysis Registry was designed to collect data describing treatments, characteristics, and outcomes of patients treated with quotidian hemodialysis (HD) worldwide. In July 2004, North American centers were first invited to enroll patients. By March 1, 2005, a total of 70 nocturnal and 8 short-daily HD patients from three Canadian and two US centers were enrolled. As recruitment continues, projected enrollment for 2005 may exceed 200 patients from North America alone. Preliminary analyses indicate that the current registry cohort is younger (mean age, 49.5 +/- 1.6 years) and carries a lower burden of comorbidity than the overall North American HD population. The low event rate expected in this cohort underlines the need for a large sample size if an appropriately powered survival study is to be undertaken. Increasing recruitment in the United States by including HD centers owned or managed by large dialysis organizations, and beginning overseas collaborations to include Australia, New Zealand, Europe, and South America will be the primary areas of focus for 2005.

Quotidian dialysis – update 2005

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The interest in quotidian hemodialysis has increased further after the HEMO study reported that high-dose thrice-weekly hemodialysis failed to improve clinical outcomes. This, in combination with a significant volume of newly published data, made a review of the topic of quotidian hemodialysis timely.

RECENT FINDINGS

The published research has revealed further evidence of cardiovascular and quality-of-life improvements as well as financial benefits with quotidian hemodialysis. Accrued worldwide experience has confirmed the previously published benefits of quotidian hemodialysis. There has been a significant effort by industry to produce patient-friendly machines for home hemodialysis. Reports on the use of daily hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration in children have appeared. An international registry of patients on quotidian hemodialysis has been created. The need for modification of the funding mechanisms and the lack of prospective randomized controlled studies on quotidian hemodialysis led to the funding of such studies by the National Institutes of Health in collaboration with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services to be completed by 2008. The proper funding for daily home hemodialysis was secured in the province of British Columbia, Canada, and is under consideration elsewhere.

SUMMARY

There is increasing evidence confirming that quotidian hemodialysis improves clinical outcomes in a cost-efficient manner. Provided that the reimbursement issues are resolved these modalities may be utilized extensively at home as well as in the in-center facilities. The revitalization of home hemodialysis will compensate for the decline in utilization of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and the nursing shortage encountered in most countries.

Is more frequent hemodialysis beneficial and what is the evidence?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The HEMO study results have shown that increasing dialysis dose in conventional thrice weekly hemodialysis does not improve patient outcomes. Interest has therefore turned to more frequent (daily) hemodialysis treatments. This review covers the rationale for such an approach together with a current review of the published study data.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have suggested improvements in a number of intermediate patient outcomes such as cardiovascular (blood pressure control, left ventricular hypertrophy), anemia, phosphate control, nutritional status and quality of life. Some of these outcomes are associated with increased survival in the dialysis population.

SUMMARY

The inference from these studies is that more frequent hemodialysis will indeed reduce mortality and morbidity. To date, however, the studies have all been small and underpowered to detect such primary outcomes. No randomized controlled trials are yet reported. The US National Institutes of Health have sponsored larger scale North American based studies and an International Registry of Daily Dialysis patients has been created to attain further information of the possible benefits of such therapy. In spite of the paucity of hard evidence the studies to date have been enough to convince some jurisdictions to recognize and fund daily hemodialysis treatments.