Antiarrhythmic efficacy of amiodarone in recurrent ventricular tachycardia evaluated by multiple electrophysiological and ambulatory ECG recordings

Invasive and noninvasive methods to predict the long-term efficacy of amiodarone: a compilation of clinical observations using meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The method of choice to predict the long-term efficacy of amiodarone in the treatment of complex ventricular arrhythmias is unknown. Whether electrophysiological testing or Holter monitoring better predicts long-term outcome is controversial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a meta-analysis of trials using electrophysiological testing or electrocardiographic monitoring to predict the efficacy of amiodarone in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia. Arrhythmia recurrence data were combined after homogeneity testing across trials. Bayesian estimates and 95% credibility intervals were constructed to compare the arrhythmia-free probability among groups. Nine studies using electrophysiological testing (351 patients) and three using Holter monitoring (167 patients) met criteria for inclusion determined a priori. The combined arrhythmia-free probability estimate and credibility intervals were 0.86 (0.78-0.92) for patients rendered noninducible and 0.81 (0.73-0.87) for patients with abolition of ventricular tachycardia during Holter monitoring on amiodarone. With this primary analysis, there was no significant difference between the predictive value of noninducibility during electrophysiological testing and abolition of ventricular tachycardia with Holter. However, if only those electrophysiological studies using at least triple extrastimuli were included, arrhythmia-free probability for patients rendered noninducible increased to 0.96 (0.88-0.99), significantly better than noninvasive testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Noninducible ventricular tachycardia during electrophysiological testing and abolition of ventricular tachycardia during electrocardiographic monitoring on amiodarone appear equally predictive of long-term amiodarone success, but this conclusion seems dependent on the stimulation protocol used. Although the yield is lower (compared to Holter monitoring), ventricular tachycardia rendered noninducible with a stimulation protocol using triple extrastimuli is the most highly predictive test of long-term amiodarone efficacy.

Amiodarone. An overview of its pharmacological properties, and review of its therapeutic use in cardiac arrhythmias

Amiodarone, originally developed over 20 years ago, is a potent antiarrhythmic drug with the actions of all antiarrhythmic drug classes. It has been successfully used in the treatment of symptomatic and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmias. In patients with left ventricular dysfunction amiodarone does not usually produce any clinically significant cardiodepression and the drug has relatively high antiarrhythmic efficacy. Preliminary studies indicate that amiodarone may have a beneficial effect on mortality and survival in certain groups of patients with ventricular arrhythmias, an action probably related to both its antiarrhythmic and antifibrillatory effects. The adverse effect profile of amiodarone is diverse, involving the cardiac, thyroid, pulmonary, hepatic, gastrointestinal, ocular, neurological and dermatological systems. Interstitial pneumonitis and hepatitis are potentially fatal, but the vast majority of adverse events are less serious, and some may be dose dependent. Pretreatment monitoring, regular assessments and the use of minimum effective doses are, therefore, necessary. Thus, with appropriate monitoring to control its well recognised adverse effects amiodarone has an important place as an effective 'broad spectrum' antiarrhythmic drug which has, so far, been used when other treatments have proved ineffective. More recent preliminary data also suggest that it may also have a beneficial effect in the prevention of sudden death in some patients.

New antiarrhythmic agents in pediatrics

This article reviews recent developments in the pharmacologic management of arrhythmias in children and provides specific information about six newer antiarrhythmic agents. With the current increase in recognition, frequency, and complexity of rhythm disturbances in children, pediatricians can expect to encounter children on these antiarrhythmic medications in their practices with increasing frequency.

Long-term clinical outcome of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation treated with amiodarone

The determinants of long-term clinical outcome were studied in 42 patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) who were treated with amiodarone as the sole antiarrhythmic agent. Of the 42 patients, 11 (26%) either died suddenly or had recurrent, symptomatic, sustained VT during a mean follow-up period of 10 months (range 0.3 to 45). Of the 19 patients without inducible VT/VF during electrophysiologic study while receiving amiodarone, 1 patient died suddenly but no patient had recurrent VT/VF. Ten of the 23 patients (43%) with persistently inducible arrhythmia have died suddenly or have had recurrent VT/VF. Using survival and stepwise logistic regression analyses, 2 significant independent predictors of recurrent arrhythmia were identified; persistently inducible VT during electrophysiologic testing in patients receiving amiodarone therapy (p less than 0.002) and the left ventricular ejection fraction at rest (p less than 0.05). The predictive accuracy of the response to serial electrophysiologic testing during amiodarone therapy was 67%, the sensitivity was 58% and the specificity was 91%. Thus, serial electrophysiologic testing is useful for determining the prognosis in patients with inducible VT/VF treated with amiodarone.

Serious adverse effects of amiodarone

Amiodarone is an effective antiarrhythmic drug which has been used successfully to treat a variety of cardiac arrhythmias. Early reports emphasized both the striking efficacy of this agent and the relative paucity of side effects necessitating discontinuing treatment with this drug. As amiodarone has been used more widely and in more diverse patient populations, reports of serious thyroid, pulmonary, cardiovascular, and other adverse reactions have appeared in the literature. In this paper, we review the serious adverse effects that have been reported to date. The incidence of these reactions varies considerably in different series, and cannot be explained solely by different doses employed or by varying methods of drug administration. The final role of amiodarone in the therapy of cardiac arrhythmias cannot be determined until the long-term toxicity has been more thoroughly investigated.

Amiodarone pulmonary toxicity

Of the side effects that complicate amiodarone therapy, pulmonary fibrosis is potentially the most serious. Therefore, the development of techniques to predict the onset of this troublesome reaction would be of great practical value. Reports of 39 patients who developed pulmonary toxicity with amiodarone were evaluated for clues to precipitating factors and information on the response to corticosteroid treatment. The majority of patients were being given maintenance doses greater than 400 mg/day. Patients appeared to improve after withdrawal of amiodarone, both with and without corticosteroid treatment. In addition, a case report is presented of a patient who developed pulmonary changes that disappeared when amiodarone was withdrawn and did not recur when amiodarone was reinstituted. Data from sequential pulmonary function tests and cumulative amiodarone dosage in 35 patients were also examined to determine their value in predicting pulmonary complications. Pulmonary function tests did not appear to be useful in predicting the likelihood of an individual patient's developing pulmonary complications. Although none of the available information identifies the mechanism mediating amiodarone pulmonary toxicity, the frequency of the complication probably can be reduced by timely reductions in maintenance dosage.

Evaluation of amiodarone therapy in the treatment of drug-resistant cardiac arrhythmias: long-term follow-up

The clinical efficacy of amiodarone in the management of complex cardiac arrhythmias refractory to therapy with two or more conventional or other investigational antiarrhythmic agents was determined by long-term follow-up in patients who had received the drug for at least 3 months. A total of 181 patients, classified into four groups (group 1, supraventricular arrhythmias, n = 42; group 2, frequent ventricular premature complexes, n = 46; group 3, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, n = 16; and group 4, sustained ventricular tachycardia, n = 77) received a daily maintenance dose of 200 to 800 mg amiodarone for up to 30 months. There was a total of 26 deaths (14%). Ten of these were probably attributable to arrhythmia, although all patients had either good or excellent response to therapy over a mean follow-up of 14.9 months prior to death. The drug had to be permanently discontinued because of side effects in only three patients, and in the majority of patients with side effects, symptoms could be alleviated with adjustment of dosage, thyroid replacement therapy, or temporary cessation of therapy. We conclude that amiodarone is highly effective in high-risk patients with complex refractory cardiac arrhythmias, and that close monitoring and prompt recognition of side effects and appropriate adjustment of dosage or institution of supplemental or replacement therapy (in less than 5% of patients) will allow continuation of amiodarone. The benefit of suppression of symptomatic arrhythmias and the potential of prevention of sudden death clearly outweigh the modest incidence of severe side effects.