Metabolic and blood pressure monitoring in diabetic renal failure

Cost-effective strategies in the prevention of diabetic nephropathy

A significant subgroup of patients with diabetes mellitus are predisposed to developing diabetic nephropathy and it is in this subgroup that other diabetes- related complications, and in particular greatly increased cardiovascular disease risk, are concentrated. The high personal, social and financial costs of managing end-stage renal failure and the other complications associated with diabetic nephropathy make a powerful case for screening and effective intervention programmes to prevent the condition or retard its progression. As major breakthroughs in finding genetic susceptibility factors remain elusive, screening efforts continue to be based on microalbuminuria testing, despite increasing recognition of its limitations as a positive predictor of nephropathy. Interventions have been extensively studied, but results remain conflicting. Economic evaluations of such screening and intervention programmes are essential for health planners, yet models of the cost/benefit ratio of such interventions often rely on a rather slim evidence base. Where economic models are developed, they are frequently based on those papers that propound the greatest clinical benefits of a given intervention, leading to a possible over-estimation of the advantages of the chosen approach. Furthermore, the benefits of even such generally accepted interventions as ACE inhibitor treatment are less firmly established than generally appreciated. Lifestyle interventions are instinctively attractive, but are by no means a low-cost option (as is often assumed by both medical professionals and politicians). This review critically assesses the evidence for clinical efficacy and economic benefit of microalbuminuria screening and interventions such as intensive glycaemic control, antihypertensive treatment, ACE inhibition and angiotensin receptor blockade, dietary protein restriction and lipid-modifying therapy. The various costs associated with diabetic nephropathy are so great that even expensive interventions may have a favourable cost/benefit ratio, provided they are truly effective.

Blood pressure and cardiac autonomic function in relation to risk factors and treatment perspectives in Type 1 diabetes

The cumulative incidence of diabetic nephropathy in Type 1 diabetes mellitus is in the order of 25 30%. The recognition that elevated blood pressure (BP) is a major factor in the progression of these patients to end-stage renal failure has led to the widespread use of antihypertensive therapy in order to preserve glomerular filtration rate and ultimately to reduce mortality. The routine measurement of microalbuminuria allows early identification of the subgroup of patients at increased risk of developing clinical nephropathy. Microalbuminuric Type 1 diabetic patients show a number of characteristic pathological abnormalities. In addition to elevated BP and abnormal circadian rhythm, there are also associated abnormalities of vagal function, lipid profile and endothelial function, as well as an increased prevalence of retinopathy. The first section of this two-part review focusses on the early changes associated with renal involvement in Type 1 diabetes. It addresses the associations between urinary albumin excretion, glycaemic control, smoking, BP, circadian BP variation, QT interval abnormalities and autonomic function in three groups of patients; those with normoalbuminuria, those progressing towards microalbuminuria and those with established low-grade microalbuminuria.

Slowing the progression of chronic renal failure: economic benefits and patients' perspectives

Because of the predicted increase in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) incidence (projected increase from 1998 to 2010; 86,825 to 172,667), prevalence (projected increase from 1998 to 2010; 326,217 to 661,330), and cost (total cost based on 1998 ratio of Medicare versus non-Medicare cost; $16.74 billion in 1998 to $39.35 billion in 2010), a cohesive national effort is needed to develop strategies to slow the progression of chronic renal failure (CRF). The question arises to how much reduction in the progression of CRF would lead to a meaningful decrease in the prevalence and cost of ESRD. There are no objective data that show the economic impact of slowing the progression of CRF. We developed a mathematical model to assess the economic impact of decreasing the progression of CRF by 10%, 20%, and 30%. US Renal Data System (USRDS) projections were used to model the rate of increase in ESRD incidence and prevalence. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at the initiation of ESRD therapy and cost per patient-year were based on USRDS data. The average decline in GFR in subjects with CRF was estimated to be 7.56 mL/min/y. All dollar savings reflect 1998 costs, discounted for the future at 3% per annum. We also determined how much slowing of the progression of CRF is important from patients' perspectives by means of a written questionnaire (which inquired about willingness to go on a restricted diet, take six extra medications per day, and make six extra office visits per year) and calculation of the pre-ESRD time gained for different degrees of reduction in the progression of CRF. If the rate of decline in GFR decreased by 10%, 20%, and 30% after December 31, 1999, in all patients with GFRs of 60 mL/min or less, cumulative direct healthcare savings through 2010 would equal approximately $18.56, $39.02, and $60.61 billion, respectively. For a 10%, 20%, and 30% decrease in the rate of decline in GFR in all patients with a GFR of 30 mL/min or less, estimated cumulative savings through 2010 equal $9.06, $19.98, and $33.37 billion, respectively. Responses to the questionnaire showed that approximately 79% of subjects with CRF (n = 113) perceived a few weeks' dialysis-free period significant (P < or = 0.0001), a period corresponding to a 10% reduction in the rate of decline in GFR. Our data suggest that the cumulative economic impact of slowing the progression of CRF, even by as little as 10%, would be staggering. They provide strong support for the development and implementation of intensive reno-protective efforts beginning at the early stages of chronic renal disease and continued throughout its course.

No deleterious effects of tight blood glucose control on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure in normoalbuminuric insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients

Intensive therapy aiming at near normalization of glucose levels effectively delays the onset and slows the progression of complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and is recommended in most patients. However, in a recent report, intensive insulin treatment was found to be associated with deleterious effects on nocturnal blood pressure (BP), the proposed mechanisms being subclinical nocturnal hypoglycemia or hyperinsulinemia. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between glycemic control, insulin dose, and 24-h ambulatory BP (AMBP) in a group of well-characterized IDDM patients. Twenty-four-h AMBP was measured in 123 normoalbuminuric [urinary albumin excretion (UAE) < 20 microg/min] IDDM patients using an oscillometric technique (SpaceLabs 90207) with readings at 20-min intervals. UAE was measured by RIA and expressed as geometric mean of three overnight collections made within 1 week. Tobacco use and level of physical activity was assessed by questionnaire. HbA1c was determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (nondiabetic range, 4.4-6.4%), and patients were stratified into quartiles according to HbA1c levels. Mean HbA1c values in the four groups were 7.0% (n = 31), 8.0% (n = 31), 8.6% (n = 31), and 9.7% (n = 30). The groups were comparable regarding age, gender, diabetes duration, body mass index, UAE, smoking status, and physical activity. AMBP levels were almost identical in the HbA1c quartiles with night values of (increasing HbA1c order): 110/63, 112/66, 112/66, and 113/65 mm Hg (P = 0.69/P = 0.32). There was no association between tight glucose control and higher nocturnal BP or a more blunted circadian BP variation. On the contrary, a weak positive correlation between night to day ratios of mean arterial BP and HbA1c values was found (r = 0.26, P = 0.005), i.e. blunted circadian BP variation is most frequent in patients with high HbA1c values. Neither did we find doses of insulin to be associated with night BP (r = 0.04, P = 0.68). Tight blood glucose control is not associated with deleterious effects on 24-h AMBP in normoalbuminuric IDDM patients. Intensive therapy can be implemented without concerns of inducing high nocturnal BP and accelerating diabetic complications.

Hypertension in diabetes mellitus

Hypertension should be detected and treated early in diabetic patients. It has a marked contribution to the morbidity and mortality of diabetic individuals due to both atherosclerosis and microvascular disease. Antihypertensive treatment is an effective tool in slowing the progression of early and advanced diabetic nephropathy. Prospective studies addressing the effects of antihypertensive regimens on the incidence of CHF, stroke, and coronary artery disease in the diabetic population are not available. We assume that the beneficial effects of therapy apply to both diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Glycemic control and the lipid profile are major concerns when selecting an antihypertensive drug. Because hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance have been advocated as hypertensive and atherosclerotic risk factors, the effects of antihypertensive drugs on insulin action and plasma insulin levels may also become an important element in the selection of an antihypertensive agent. ACE inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, and alpha-adrenergic blockers probably offer the most favorable metabolic profile when compared with diuretics and beta-blockers and should be used as the initial drugs in most clinical settings.

Effect of intensive treatment on diabetic nephropathy in patients with type I diabetes

We evaluated the long-term effect of an intensive treatment of diabetic nephropathy (anti-hypertensive drugs, low protein diet, multiple insulin injections to achieve a good metabolic control) on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and albumin excretion rate (AER). Fourteen type I diabetic patients (mean age 45 +/- 9.5 years, mean duration of diabetes 23.5 +/- 7.3 years, 8 males/6 females) with glomerular filtration rate < 70 ml/min-1/1.73 m2 and albumin excretion rate > 30 micrograms/min were treated intensively for 36 months. This intensive treatment consisted of multiple insulin injections, antihypertensive therapy with ACE inhibitors and a low-protein diet (0.8 g/kg body wt/day.) Renal function was evaluated as GFR and AER. HbA1c mean value decreased significantly from 8.7 +/- 0.8% to 6.5 +/- 0.5% (P < 0.0002). GFR rose from 58 +/- 12 ml/min-1/1.73 m2 to 84 +/- 11 ml/min-1/1.73 m2 (P < 0.0008). AER decreased from 208 micrograms/min (range: 73 to 500) to 63.8 micrograms/min (range 15 to 180; P < 0.05). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased respectively from 144 +/- 26 mm Hg to 120 +/- 15 mm Hg and from 89 +/- 9 mm Hg to 75 +/- 8 mm Hg (P < 0.01). We obtained a rise of GFR and a reduction of proteinuria after three years of this treatment. We suggest that this intensive treatment in all patients with early stage diabetic nephropathy may be effective in slowing the progression to renal failure.

The quantitative relationship between treated blood pressure and progression of diabetic renal disease

Antihypertensive therapy reduces the rate at which glomerular filtration rate (GFR) declines (delta GFR) in diabetic nephropathy; however, the optimal blood pressure is unknown. The quantitative relationship between treated blood pressure and delta GFR was analyzed retrospectively in 59 patients with established diabetic nephropathy and treated hypertension using weighted univariate and weighted multivariate regression. The GFR was calculated using the Cockcroft and Gault formula. More rapid GFR loss correlated most strongly with higher diastolic blood pressures (r = 0.70; P < 0.0001); for each millimeter of mercury of diastolic blood pressure, the GFR decreased by 0.69 mL/min/yr. This relationship remained present if those individuals with diastolic pressures greater than 90 mm Hg were eliminated from the study (r = 0.50; P < 0.001). The correlation for systolic blood pressure was weaker (r = 0.30; P < 0.05) and explained completely by covariance between systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The correlation for mean blood pressure (r = 0.59; P < 0.0001) fell between the correlations for diastolic and systolic blood pressures. Proteinuria, serum albumin concentration, and serum cholesterol concentration also correlated with delta GFR. In multivariate analysis, neither these indices of disease severity nor the initial GFR explained the correlation between delta GFR and diastolic blood pressure. Age, sex, race, type of diabetes, and percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin did not correlate with delta GFR.

Effective antihypertensive treatment postpones renal insufficiency in diabetic nephropathy

The effect of long-term, aggressive, antihypertensive treatment on kidney function in diabetic nephropathy was studied prospectively in 11 insulin-dependent diabetic patients (mean age, 30 years). Renal function was assessed every 4 months by measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (single-bolus 51Cr-EDTA technique) and by albuminuria (radial immunodiffusion). During the median pretreatment period of 2.4 years (range, 1.9 to 5.5 years), the GFR decreased significantly and albuminuria and the arterial blood pressure increased significantly. During the 9.7-year (range, 2.8 to 10.4 year) period of antihypertensive treatment with metoprolol, hydralazine, and furosemide, the arterial blood pressure decreased from 143/96 mm Hg to 130/84 mm Hg and albuminuria decreased from 1,038 micrograms/min to 547 micrograms/min. The rate of decline in GFR decreased from 10.7 mL/min/yr (range, 5.3 to 17.5 mL/min/yr) before treatment to 2.5 mL/min/yr (range, 0.5 to 4.8 mL/min/yr) during treatment. The rate of decline in GFR is significantly smaller during the last 6 years compared with the first 3 years in patients who received long-term antihypertensive treatment (> or = 9 years). One patient died from acute myocardial infarction (GFR, 46 mL/min/1.73 m2). Effective antihypertensive treatment postpones renal insufficiency in diabetic nephropathy.

The epidemiology of diabetic nephropathy

Many areas of information in the epidemiology of diabetic nephropathy are lacking, but multiple studies designed specifically to answer these questions are currently being conducted. In the next 5-10 years, our current understanding of the epidemiology of diabetic nephropathy may either be confirmed or discredited. In the meantime, clinicians should use the data available to make decisions about treatment and should focus on the modifiable factors of glucose and blood pressure control in both IDDM and NIDDM, especially in patients with low-level albuminuria or clinical proteinuria.

Prognosis in diabetic nephropathy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of long term antihypertensive treatment on prognosis in diabetic nephropathy.

DESIGN

Prospective study of all insulin dependent diabetic patients aged under 50 with onset of diabetes before the age of 31 who developed diabetic nephropathy between 1974 and 1978 at Steno Memorial Hospital.

SETTING

Outpatient diabetic clinic in tertiary referral centre.

PATIENTS

Forty five patients (20 women) with a mean age of 30 (SD 7) years and a mean duration of diabetes of 18 (7) years at onset of persistent proteinuria were followed until death or for at least 10 years.

INTERVENTIONS

Antihypertensive treatment was started a median of three (0-13) years after onset of nephropathy. Four patients (9%) received no treatment, and 9 (20%), 13 (29%), and 19 (42%) were treated with one, two, or three drugs, respectively. The median follow up was 12 (4-15) years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Arterial blood pressure and death.

RESULTS

Mean blood pressure at start of antihypertensive treatment was 148/95 (15/50) mm Hg. Systolic blood pressure remained almost unchanged (slope -0.01 (95% confidence interval -0.39 to 0.37) mm Hg a year) while diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly (0.87 (0.65 to 1.10) mm Hg a year) during antihypertensive treatment. The cumulative death rate was 18% (8 to 32%) 10 years after onset of nephropathy, in contrast to previous reports of 50% to 77% 10 years after onset of nephropathy. As in previous studies, uraemia was the main cause of death (9 patients; 64%).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of diabetic nephropathy has improved during the past decade largely because of effective antihypertensive treatment.

Aldose reductase in the etiology of diabetic complications: 2. Nephropathy

The progression of diabetic nephropathy can be arrested by an improvement in diabetic control. High glucose concentrations increase the flux through the aldose reductase pathway, and it has been proposed that this may contribute to renal damage. Aldose reductase is present in both the glomerulus and the renal tubule. Biochemical changes associated with increased sorbitol production have been demonstrated in animal models, including myo-inositol depletion, reduced Na+-K+ ATPase activity, and activation of the pentose phosphate and glucuronate-xylose pathways. Selective inhibition of aldose reductase reverses these biochemical changes and prevents some of the structural and functional abnormalities in diabetic rats. The potential beneficial effects of aldose reductase inhibitors on diabetic kidney disease in man are at present being investigated.

Diabetic nephropathy in insulin-dependent diabetic patients: renal hemodynamics and derived treatment strategies

Late complications such as retinopathy and neuropathy contribute substantially to the morbidity of patients with diabetes mellitus but have only moderate effect on their life expectancy. However, once diabetic nephropathy occurs, life expectancy of patients with diabetes mellitus is shortened considerably. This review discusses briefly several possible pathogenetic mechanisms involved in the development of diabetic nephropathy. Changes in renal hemodynamics as the initiating and contributing factor to the development of diabetic nephropathy are discussed in more detail. Finally, the article reviews possible therapeutic measures to prevent the development of diabetic nephropathy, or to slow down its progression.

Early renal involvement and nephropathy. Can treatment modalities be predicted from identification of risk factors in diabetics?

There is now circumstantial evidence indicating that initiation and progression of renal disease in diabetes is associated with the degree of metabolic control, although modifying factors, such as elevation of blood pressure and, possibly, dietary protein intake, are important. Further, there is differential susceptibility, and more studies are clearly needed to clarify why some patients develop nephropathy and others do not, despite similar metabolic control. Metabolic control, blood pressure level and protein intake are probably not only risk factors but are also involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. Thus, intervention by optimizing glycaemic control and blood pressure treatment and by low-protein diets appears possible and can be recommended as a prudent treatment programme. Early clinical detection of patients at risk for late nephropathy is already possible, since easy, rapid, inexpensive methods for detecting microalbuminuria are now available.

High blood pressure is a major factor in progression of diabetic nephropathy

Arterial hypertension is a frequent finding, even early in the course of diabetic nephropathy. Systemic and glomerular hypertension enhance the development of diabetic glomerulopathy and accelerate the rate of decline in glomerular filtration rate in diabetic nephropathy. Conversely, effective antihypertensive treatment reduces albuminuria and diminishes the rate of decline in glomerular filtration rate, thereby postponing end-stage renal failure in diabetic nephropathy.

Impact of metabolic control in progression of clinical diabetic nephropathy

Renal clearance of 51Cr-EDTA as a measure of glomerular filtration rate was followed prospectively for 21 months in 18 Type 1 (insulin-dependent) patients with juvenile-onset diabetes and nephropathy. Hypertension was treated aggressively, attaining a mean blood pressure of 154/88 mmHg in the supine and 126/82 mmHg in the standing position. The mean glycosylated haemoglobin value (HbA1c) during the observation period was found to correlate well with the mean of random blood glucose values (r = 0.72). It also correlated to the rate of glomerular filtration rate decline over time, whether the latter was calculated as slope coefficient for all available data (r = -0.52, p less than 0.05) or based on the first and last observations only (r = -0.57, p less than 0.05). In a multiple linear stepwise regression analysis also including mean arterial blood pressure, the correlation between glomerular filtration rate decline and HbA1c was significant at p less than 0.01; this explained one-third of the progression, while mean arterial pressure could not be shown to contribute. It is concluded that hyperglycaemia, contrary to the general belief, is a risk factor for the progression of clinical diabetic nephropathy with reduced glomerular filtration rate.