Expression of p27 and p53: comparative analysis of uterine carcinosarcoma and endometrial carcinoma

Comparative analysis of EZH2, p16 and p53 expression in uterine carcinosarcomas

Introduction: The role of p16 and p53 immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of rare and aggressive uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) has been well established. However, enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), a histone methyltransferase and a member of the polycomb group family is a relatively new biomarker, with limited published data on its significance in this tumor type. The goal of this study was to examine EZH2 expression in UCS and its components, in correlation with morphological features, and p16 and p53 staining patterns. Methods: Twenty-eight UCSs were included in the study. EZH2, p16 and p53 immunoreactivity were assessed independently by two pathologists in both tumor components (epithelial and mesenchymal). EZH2 and p16 immunostains were scored semiquantitatively: based on the percentage and intensity of tumor cell staining a binary staining index ("high- or low-expressing") was calculated. The p53 staining pattern was evaluated as wild-type or aberrant (diffuse nuclear, null, or cytoplasmic expression). Statistical tests were used to evaluate the correlation between staining patterns for all three markers and the different tumor components and histotypes. Results: High EZH2 and p16 expression and aberrant p53 patterns were present in 89.3% 78.6% and 85.7% of the epithelial component and in 78.6%, 62.5% and 82.1% of the mesenchymal component, respectively. Differences among these expression rates were not found to be significant (p > 0.05). Regarding the epithelial component, aberrant p53 pattern was found to be significantly (p = 0.0474) more frequent in the serous (100%) than in endometrioid (66.6%) histotypes. Within the mesenchymal component, p53 null expression pattern occurred significantly (p = 0.0257) more frequently in heterologous sarcoma components (71.4%) compared to the homologous histotype (18.8%). Conclusion: In conclusion, EZH2, p16 and p53 seem to play a universal role in the pathogenesis of UCS; however, a distinctive pattern of p53 expression appears to exist between the serous and endometrioid carcinoma components and also between the homologous and heterologous sarcoma components.

Study of the Association of Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog and p27 Expressions in Endometrial Hyperplasia and Carcinoma

Introduction:

Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and p27 are commonly mutated gene in endometrial carcinoma (EC) and their association in development of EC has not been fully understood.

The Aim of the Study:

The aim is to clarify the association of PTEN and p27 in EC and their correlation with the histologic grade.

Material and Methods:

Paraffin-embedded 20 and 50 specimens representing EH and EC were collected, cut into 4 mm thick and stained with H&E stain for histopathological examination. All EC cases were graded according to the percentage of nonsquamous solid pattern into 3 grades. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses were done using a rabbit polyclonal anti-PTEN antibody and a rabbit monoclonal anti-p27 antibody. Evaluation of reactivity was categorized: 1+ (weak) = less than 10%, 2+ (moderate) = 11 to 50% and 3+ (strong) = more than 50% tumor. t-test, one way ANOVA and chi-square test were used in the statistical analysis.

Results:

Loss of PTEN was seen in 7/20 (35%) and 29/50 (58%) of EH and EC cases with significance (P =0.01824), opposite to 17/20 (85%) and 25/50 (50%) of p27 (P = 0.00334). Both antibodies showed significance in EH cases only (P = 0.00019). No correlation with the histological grade for both antibodies. Four major categories were formulated; PTEN+/p27+ (n = 2, 14, 10%, 28%), PTEN+/p27- (n = 5, 7; 25% and 14%), PTEN-/p27+ (n = 1, 11; 5%, 22%) PTEN-/p27- (n = 12, 18; 60%, 36%) cases of EH and EC, respectively with no significant difference obtained.

Conclusion:

Not all cases of PTEN negative EC showing p27 loss and vice versa. Despite many studies reacted with PTEN and p27 expression in EC, none of them is confirmatory to adjust the correlation between them in EC. So, more studies must be done to correlate between the degree of PTEN loss and p27 comprising all subtypes and grading of EC.

Review of Recommended Treatment of Uterine Carcinosarcoma

Surgery is the primary treatment for uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). Lymphadenectomy should be performed for staging purposes in tumors apparently confined to the uterus. Most studies found that lymphadenectomy is of therapeutic value. The therapeutic value of cytoreduction to no residual macroscopic disease in advanced UCS is based mostly on small retrospective uncontrolled studies. Postoperative adjuvant therapy should be considered for all stages of UCS. Adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy may reduce locoregional recurrences. However, this does not translate into improved overall survival since most recurrences are distant outside the irradiated field, and the survival rates remain poor, the 5-year overall survival being about 50%. Several adjuvant platin-based combination chemotherapy schedules such as cisplatin/ifosfamide, ifosfamide/paclitaxel, and paclitaxel/carboplatin have been found to be an effective mode of adjuvant treatment. Multimodal therapy (i.e., adjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy) has also been shown to be effective. Most studies dealing with adjuvant treatment are retrospective and prospective randomized controlled trials (i.e., phase III studies) comparing that between the various adjuvant chemotherapy schedules and between them and multimodal treatment are lacking. Quality of life with the various treatment modalities needs also to be assessed. An effective targeted therapy has so far not been found. In spite of the multiple studies with regard to the treatment of UCS published during the last 15 years, the optimal management of UCS is still not established.

C-kit Mutations in Endometrial Cancer: Correlation with Tumor Histologic Type

OBJECTIVE

Endometrial cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women in developed countries. Affected patients may benefit from systemic chemotherapy, alone or in combination with targeted therapies if the disease is clinically diagnosed prior to expansion and metastasis to other organs.The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic role of c-kit mutations and comparision with tumor type and grade in human uterine endometrial carcinomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy five patients with endometrial carcinoma and seventy five normal controls were studied for possible mutations in exon 17 of the c-kit gene using single strand conformational polymorphisms and sequencing.

RESULTS

c-kit mutation in exon 17 appeared to be significantly different between endometrial carcinoma and normal endometrium. The pattern and frequency of the mutations was also shown to be different between tumors from different stages.

Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and outcomes in uterine carcinosarcoma and grade 3 endometrial cancer patients: a comparative study

Objective

Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) shared the same staging system with endometrial carcinoma in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009. The aim of the present study was to compare the clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics between UCS and grade 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (G3EC).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 60 UCS and 115 G3EC patients with initial treatment at the Department of Gynecology in the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between February 2006 and August 2013. Chi-square analysis was used to compare differences between variables. Prognostic factors were determined using univariate/multivariate analysis, and the survival rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox regression model was used to assess the independent prognostic factor.

Results

UCS had significantly worse overall survival (OS) compared with G3EC. Carcinosarcoma subtype was an independent factor (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 5.8; p=0.039), stratified based on stage. Compared with G3EC, UCS patients had a greater incidence of ascites fluid (55.0% vs. 15.7%, p<0.001) and adnexal involvement (20.0% vs. 8.7%, p=0.048) and larger median tumor volume (4.6 cm vs. 4.0 cm, p=0.046). Subgroup analysis of the prognostic factors revealed that UCS patients exhibited worse OS than G3EC patients in such specific subgroups as patients at younger ages, with postmenopausal status, without ascites fluid, with early stage diseases, without vagina invasion, without lymph node metastases and receiving adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy. Adjuvant radiotherapy with chemotherapy was predictive of better survival in UCS patients compared with chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone (5-year OS, 71.0% vs. 35.8%, p=0.028). Multivariate Cox regression revealed that tumor mesenchymal component (HR, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 15.8; p=0.014) was an independent prognostic factor for UCS, whereas advanced stages (HR, 5.9; 95% CI, 1.0 to 33.9; p=0.046) and ascites fluid (HR, 5.1; 95% CI, 1.1 to 22.7; p=0.032) were independently correlated with poor prognosis for G3EC patients.

Conclusion

The distinctions in both clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics between UCS and G3EC suggest that this subtype should be treated separately from high-risk epithelial endometrial carcinoma.

A multi-institutional study of outcomes in stage I-III uterine carcinosarcoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of adjuvant therapy after primary surgery for stage I-III uterine carcinosarcoma (CS).

METHODS

A multi-institutional retrospective study of women with stage I-III CS was conducted. Analyses were stratified by stage (I/II and III). Patients were categorized according to adjuvant therapy: observation (OBS), radiation (RT), chemotherapy (CT) or multimodal therapy (CT+RT). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

303 patients were identified across four institutions: 195 with stage I/II and 108 with stage III disease. In stage I/II disease, 75 (39.9%) received OBS, 33 (17.6%) CT, 37 (19.7%) RT, and 43 (22.9%) CT+RT. OBS was associated with a fourfold increased risk of death compared to CT (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR)=4.48, p=0.003). Patients receiving CT+RT had significantly improved PFS compared to those receiving CT alone (aHR=0.43, p=0.04), but no difference in OS. In the stage III cohort, 16 (15.0%) received OBS, 34 (31.8%) CT, 20 (18.7%) RT, and 37 (34.6%) CT+RT. OBS was associated with worse OS and PFS compared to CT (OS: aHR=2.46, p=0.04; PFS: aHR=2.39, p=0.03, respectively). A potential improvement in PFS was seen for those treated with CT+RT compared to CT alone, however it was not statistically significant (aHR=0.53, p=0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Observation after surgery was associated with poor outcomes in uterine CS compared to CT and RT alone. Multimodality therapy for women with stage I/II disease was associated with improved PFS compared to chemotherapy alone. Novel treatment options are needed to improve outcomes in this aggressive disease.

Staging of uterine sarcomas

Uterine sarcomas comprise leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, adenosarcoma, undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma, and their variants. Carcinosarcoma is historically classified as sarcoma, but it is now regarded as a metaplastic carcinoma. Uterine sarcomas are rare, and are traditionally staged in the same way as endometrial carcinoma. Because of their different clinical and biological behaviours, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics introduced a new staging system in 2009 for leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma and adenosarcoma, and carcinosarcoma, respectively. Following an extensive literature review no good evidence was found to support the modification of the staging system. This is mainly because of the rarity of the sarcomas and the heterogeneity of the reports, the different diagnostic criteria and treatments changing over the decades the retrospective nature and small sample size in most studies, and the lack of uniform pathological review even in large studies. Currently, evidence is still lacking about the use of preoperative imaging for staging purpose, and uterine sarcomas remain to be surgically staged. Total hysterectomy is the cornerstone for both staging and treatment. Newer evidence shows that routine lymphadenectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy may not be necessary, unless in the presence of extra-uterine spread, suspicious ovaries or lymph nodes, and certain poor histological types, such as undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma and adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth. More research and data collection are definitely needed in order to verify and further revise the current staging systems.

Endometrial carcinoma recurring as carcinosarcoma: Report of two cases

Endometrial carcinosarcoma is a rare, aggressive disease, accounting for approximately 3% of all uterine neoplasms. The emergence of sarcomatous elements is considered the evolution of subclones arising from high grade endometrial carcinomas. Here, we report two cases of primary endometrial carcinomas recurring as carcinosarcoma. Case 1. a 58-year-old postmenopausal woman diagnosed to have a poorly differentiated endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma (FIGO stage IB) developed an intra-abdominal recurrence of disease after 17 months from diagnosis. Histopathological analysis documented a biphasic neoplasia consisting of an epithelial (grade 3 endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma) and a sarcomatous component. Salvage chemotherapy with cisplatin, ifosfamide, epirubicin, and then with taxotere was attempted. The patient died after 2 months. Case 2. A 56-year-old woman with a diagnosis of grade 3 endometrial adenosquamous carcinoma of the endometrium (FIGO stage IIIA) experienced pelvic recurrence after five months from completion of chemotherapy. Definitive histology was malignant mixed mesodermal tumor with focal areas of chondrosarcomatous elements. The patient was triaged to exclusive concomitant chemoradiotherapy and salvage chemotherapy. The patient died after 3 months. We describe two cases of high grade endometrial carcinomas recurring as carcinosarcoma, thus providing evidence that the metaplastic sarcomatous evolution is a very rare event which can occur in patients with anaplastic endometrial cancer.

The management of patients with uterine sarcoma: a debated clinical challenge

Uterine sarcomas include a heterogeneous group of rare tumours that usually have an aggressive clinical behaviour and a poor prognosis. Total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy represents the standard surgical treatment. Pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy is indicated for carcinosarcoma, but not for leiomyosarcoma and undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma. Some recent data on low numbers of patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma appear to show an incidence of nodal involvement higher than previously expected, thus suggesting a role for lymphadenectomy in this malignancy. Carcinosarcoma also requires a comprehensive surgical peritoneal staging. Postoperative treatment of uterine sarcomas has been long debated. Adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy appears to improve local control without any significant impact on overall survival. There is little evidence in the literature supporting the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in any gynaecological sarcomas except for carcinosarcomas. However, uterine sarcomas have a high tendency to develop distant recurrences, and recent data on adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas are promising. As for the drugs to be used, it is worth noting that in a Swiss study, the combination of ifosfamide (IFO) and doxorubicin (DOX) obtained similar response rates in advanced gynaecological sarcomas and in advanced soft tissue sarcomas of other sites. In our decision-making scheme for early-stage disease, patients with leiomyosarcoma or undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma should receive adjuvant doxorubicin/epidoxorubicin (EPIDX)+ifosfamide, and those with carcinosarcoma should be treated with adjuvant cisplatin (CDDP)-based chemotherapy. The same drug regimens are used for the treatment of advanced disease. Sequential pelvic radiotherapy following chemotherapy could be delivered to selected cases. Recurrent disease often requires the integration of different therapeutic modalities, but no curative option is currently available with the possible exception of surgery for lung metastases and hormone therapy with or without debulking surgery for recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Patients should be encouraged to enter clinical trials designed to identify new active drugs for these malignancies.

DNA mismatch repair and TP53 defects are early events in uterine carcinosarcoma tumorigenesis

Growing molecular evidence shows that uterine carcinosarcomas are clonal tumors. The carcinoma component has a dominant effect in the aggressive clinical behavior of these tumors. Defective DNA mismatch repair affects up to 30% of endometrial adenocarcinomas. The frequency and importance of defective DNA mismatch repair in the histiogenesis of uterine carcinosarcomas remains controversial. We studied the pattern and frequency of defective DNA mismatch repair and TP53 alterations in the epithelial and mesenchymal components of 28 uterine carcinosarcomas. We found evidence of defective DNA mismatch repair in six cases (21%) with a concordance rate of 83% for carcinoma-sarcoma pairs (kappa=0.887, P<0.001). Lack of immunostaining for the MLH1 protein was demonstrated in both components in two of these tumors. TP53 defects were evaluated by 17p deletion analysis and p53 immunostaining. Nineteen carcinoma (68%) and 18 sarcoma (64%) components had evidence of either TP53 allelic loss or p53 overexpression. These defects proved clonal in 76% of cases (kappa=0.602, P=0.003). Our results indicate that defective DNA mismatch repair and TP53 defects are common early events in carcinosarcoma tumorigenesis. The high rate of concordance for these molecular defects between the carcinoma and sarcoma components adds to existing molecular evidence that carcinosarcomas are clonal malignancies.

A comparison between different postoperative treatment modalities of uterine carcinosarcoma

OBJECTIVE

Uterine carcinosarcomas are highly aggressive neoplasms with no established effective adjuvant therapy. The aim of the present study was to compare between the outcome in three medical institutions in each of which a different postoperative treatment modality was preferred, namely, chemotherapy in one, whole pelvic irradiation (WPI) in another, and sequential treatment (i.e., chemotherapy followed by WPI) in the third.

METHODS

The hospital records of all 49 uterine carcinosarcoma patients diagnosed and operated from 1995 to 2003 in the three institutions were reviewed. Non-parametric test was used to compare the median age between the treatment groups. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to assess the effect of treatment type on survival after adjustment for stage.

RESULTS

Only about half of the patients (51%) had stage I at diagnosis and the majority of the patients (83.7%) had postoperative adjuvant treatment. The overall 5-year survival of the 41 patients that had postoperative treatment was 49.6%. The highest median survival and 5-year survival rate was observed in the sequential treatment group. Controlling for stage, this treatment modality was associated with a significant decrease in mortality of about 80% when compared to postoperative chemotherapy alone, and a non-significant decrease in mortality of about 50% when compared to WPI alone (HR = 0.20; 95% CI 0.04-0.99, P = 0.049 and HR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.1-2.32, P = 0.4, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The improved outcome in patients who received postoperative sequential treatment seems to indicate that further exploration of this treatment modality is justified.

Expression of c-kit in uterine carcinosarcoma

OBJECTIVES

The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has resulted in successful treatment of KIT-positive neoplasms. Carcinosarcoma is a very aggressive neoplasm. Consequently, c-kit expression may have significant clinical implications for this tumor. The purpose of the present study was to assess c-kit expression in the carcinomatous and sarcomatous element of carcinosarcoma to identify if KIT represents a therapeutic target for treatment of this neoplasm.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining for c-KIT was performed on paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of 20 consecutive uterine specimens with carcinosarcoma, 40 with endometrial carcinoma, and 12 with atrophic endometrium. Two pathologists assessed the scoring index of staining.

RESULTS

In the stromal element of carcinosarcoma, no immunohistochemically c-KIT stained cells were observed and in the epithelial element, a low scoring index of staining was present. In endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, the scoring index was high in only 15% of the specimens. In the atrophic endometrium, a low scoring index was seen in all specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results seem to suggest that c-kit probably plays no major role in the pathogenesis of the majority of these tumors while it may be involved in the pathogenesis of some endometrial carcinomas. In view of the multiple molecular targets that are activated by imatinib mesylate, no definitive conclusions can be drawn with regard its effectiveness in carcinosarcomas based on the present study. Further studies of c-kit expression in larger series of carcinosarcomas in order to settle the controversial issues with regard to frequency of expression, prognostic, and clinical value are warranted.