Evaluation of stool antigen test, PCR on ORAL samples and serology for the noninvasive detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in children

A time-resolved fluorescent microsphere-lateral flow immunoassay strip assay with image visual analysis for quantitative detection of Helicobacter pylori in saliva

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a kind of microaerobic and food-borne pathogen. More than 4.4 billion individuals have been infected by H. pylori and H. pylori was listed as Group I carcinogen by WHO in 1994. Considering the high infection rate of H. pylori and the limited medical resources, self-testing is helpful for diagnosis and timely treatment. Although the amount of H. pylori in human saliva is low, the sampling of saliva is simple and convenient compared with stomach, blood and stool samples. Therefore, H. pylori in human saliva can be an indicator for self-testing, and a sensitive and easy-to-use assay is necessary. In this study, we developed a time-resolved fluorescent microsphere-lateral flow immunoassay (TRFM-LFIA) strip assay with image visual analysis for detection of H. pylori in saliva. The detection of the TRFM-LFIA strip was easy to use and had a low dependency on equipment. With optimized preparation and detection parameters, the whole detection process could be finished in 8 min and the LOD by naked eyes was 10² CFU/mL. For quantitative analysis by image visual analysis, the LOD was as low as 1.05 CFU/mL in the linear range of 10¹-10⁵ CFU/mL. Besides, the TRFM-LFIA strip also had good stability, reliability, repeatability and accuracy. All these advantages indicated that the TRFM-LFIA strips developed in this study had a good potential for self-testing for H. pylori infection.

Usefulness of Molecular Methods for Helicobacter pylori Detection in Pediatric Patients and Their Correlation with Histopathological Sydney Classification

Helicobacter pylori infections, as one of the most prevalent among humans, are generally acquired during childhood, and are one of the main causes of chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer disease. A bacterial culture from a gastric biopsy is the gold standard and is the only method that has 100% specificity. However, its sensitivity varies, depending on experience of the laboratory staff, applied culture media, specimen transport conditions, biopsy site, and quality of the sample. The same factors compromise all invasive methods and a culture-based H. pylori infection diagnostic, as well as a recent intake of antibiotics, bismuth-containing compounds, and proton pump inhibitors. Molecular methods have been used for clinical microbiology investigation since the beginning of the 21st century. However, their usefulness for H. pylori infections diagnosis remains unclear, especially in pediatric patients. The aim of the study was to assess the incidence of H. pylori infections in a group of 104 pediatric patients and to compare the results of the PCR test with the corresponding histopathological investigation effects. Among the biopsy samples collected from 104 children, 44 (42.3%) were positive in PCR, while 43 (41.3%) and 39 (37.5%) presented histologically-confirmed signs of inflammation and H. pylori colonization, respectively. Moreover, the mean grades of the parameters of the histopathological examination were higher in the group of PCR-positive samples. The compatibility of both research methods was confirmed, emphasizing the usefulness of molecular methods for detecting H. pylori infections in pediatric patients. Considering that the PCR-based method gives reliable results and is less time-consuming and costly, it is worth discussing this method as a new standard in the diagnosis of H. pylori infections, at least among pediatric patients, for which culture-based diagnostics is not sufficient or histopathological examination is negative, while inflammation signs are observed macroscopically.

Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection has been implicated in a number of malignancies and non-malignant conditions including peptic ulcers, non-ulcer dyspepsia, recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding, unexplained iron deficiency anaemia, idiopathic thrombocytopaenia purpura, and colorectal adenomas. The confirmatory diagnosis of H pylori is by endoscopic biopsy, followed by histopathological examination using haemotoxylin and eosin (H & E) stain or special stains such as Giemsa stain and Warthin-Starry stain. Special stains are more accurate than H & E stain. There is significant uncertainty about the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for diagnosis of H pylori.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of urea breath test, serology, and stool antigen test, used alone or in combination, for diagnosis of H pylori infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic people, so that eradication therapy for H pylori can be started.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Science Citation Index and the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Database on 4 March 2016. We screened references in the included studies to identify additional studies. We also conducted citation searches of relevant studies, most recently on 4 December 2016. We did not restrict studies by language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included diagnostic accuracy studies that evaluated at least one of the index tests (urea breath test using isotopes such as 13C or 14C, serology and stool antigen test) against the reference standard (histopathological examination using H & E stain, special stains or immunohistochemical stain) in people suspected of having H pylori infection.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the references to identify relevant studies and independently extracted data. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the QUADAS-2 tool. We performed meta-analysis by using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model to estimate and compare SROC curves. Where appropriate, we used bivariate or univariate logistic regression models to estimate summary sensitivities and specificities.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 101 studies involving 11,003 participants, of which 5839 participants (53.1%) had H pylori infection. The prevalence of H pylori infection in the studies ranged from 15.2% to 94.7%, with a median prevalence of 53.7% (interquartile range 42.0% to 66.5%). Most of the studies (57%) included participants with dyspepsia and 53 studies excluded participants who recently had proton pump inhibitors or antibiotics.There was at least an unclear risk of bias or unclear applicability concern for each study.Of the 101 studies, 15 compared the accuracy of two index tests and two studies compared the accuracy of three index tests. Thirty-four studies (4242 participants) evaluated serology; 29 studies (2988 participants) evaluated stool antigen test; 34 studies (3139 participants) evaluated urea breath test-13C; 21 studies (1810 participants) evaluated urea breath test-14C; and two studies (127 participants) evaluated urea breath test but did not report the isotope used. The thresholds used to define test positivity and the staining techniques used for histopathological examination (reference standard) varied between studies. Due to sparse data for each threshold reported, it was not possible to identify the best threshold for each test.Using data from 99 studies in an indirect test comparison, there was statistical evidence of a difference in diagnostic accuracy between urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology and stool antigen test (P = 0.024). The diagnostic odds ratios for urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test were 153 (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.7 to 316), 105 (95% CI 74.0 to 150), 47.4 (95% CI 25.5 to 88.1) and 45.1 (95% CI 24.2 to 84.1). The sensitivity (95% CI) estimated at a fixed specificity of 0.90 (median from studies across the four tests), was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.97) for urea breath test-13C, 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.94) for urea breath test-14C, 0.84 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.91) for serology, and 0.83 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.90) for stool antigen test. This implies that on average, given a specificity of 0.90 and prevalence of 53.7% (median specificity and prevalence in the studies), out of 1000 people tested for H pylori infection, there will be 46 false positives (people without H pylori infection who will be diagnosed as having H pylori infection). In this hypothetical cohort, urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test will give 30 (95% CI 15 to 58), 42 (95% CI 30 to 58), 86 (95% CI 50 to 140), and 89 (95% CI 52 to 146) false negatives respectively (people with H pylori infection for whom the diagnosis of H pylori will be missed).Direct comparisons were based on few head-to-head studies. The ratios of diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were 0.68 (95% CI 0.12 to 3.70; P = 0.56) for urea breath test-13C versus serology (seven studies), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.14 to 5.56; P = 0.84) for urea breath test-13C versus stool antigen test (seven studies). The 95% CIs of these estimates overlap with those of the ratios of DORs from the indirect comparison. Data were limited or unavailable for meta-analysis of other direct comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people without a history of gastrectomy and those who have not recently had antibiotics or proton ,pump inhibitors, urea breath tests had high diagnostic accuracy while serology and stool antigen tests were less accurate for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.This is based on an indirect test comparison (with potential for bias due to confounding), as evidence from direct comparisons was limited or unavailable. The thresholds used for these tests were highly variable and we were unable to identify specific thresholds that might be useful in clinical practice.We need further comparative studies of high methodological quality to obtain more reliable evidence of relative accuracy between the tests. Such studies should be conducted prospectively in a representative spectrum of participants and clearly reported to ensure low risk of bias. Most importantly, studies should prespecify and clearly report thresholds used, and should avoid inappropriate exclusions.

Accuracy of stool antigen test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is regarded as a major pathogen in gastrointestinal diseases and the infection rate is still at a high level in children. Therefore, the diagnosis is of great clinical importance. The objective was to perform a meta-analysis on H. pylori stool antigen test (SAT) for the diagnosis of the infection in children.

METHODS

Published information on the sensitivity and specificity of stool antigen test in each study was collected to assess the accuracy of the test for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. Forty-five eligible studies were selected for analysis. Data on the publication year, H. pylori prevalence, eradication rate and gold standard of each study were summarized.

RESULT

Forty-five studies, including 5931 patients, evaluated the accurancy of H. pylori SAT. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+ and LR- were: 92.1%, 94.1%, 17.01, 0.085, respectively. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of H. pylori SAT in different situations and found that sensitivity and specificity were significantly higher when monoclonal H. pylori SAT and two or more reference methods were used.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of H. pylori antigen in stools with ELISA monoclonal antibodies is a non-invasive efficient test for the diagnosis of infection in children. However, the available one-step and polyclonal SAT tests are still unreliable.

Utility of stool sample-based tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children

OBJECTIVE

Helicobacter pylori antigen or DNA in stool are meant to detect the bacteria; however, in children the colonization of the gastric mucosa by H pylori is usually weak and fecal excretion of antigen or DNA varies considerably, challenging the utility of these tests in this age group. The aim of the present study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the performance of stool H pylori DNA and antigen tests for the diagnosis of infection in children.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the accuracy of stool tests for diagnosis of H pylori infection in children. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and LILACS databases. Selection criteria included participation of at least 30 children and the use of a criterion standard for H pylori diagnosis. In a comprehensive search, we identified 48 studies.

RESULTS

Regarding antigen-detection tests, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) monoclonal antibodies showed the best performance, with sensitivity and specificity of 97%, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 29.9, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.03. ELISA polyclonal antibodies had sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 93%, LR+ of 16.2, LR- of 0.09, and high heterogeneity (P < 0.0001). One-step monoclonal antibody tests demonstrated sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 93%, LR+ of 10.6, and LR- of 0.11. For DNA detection, polymerase chain reaction-based test showed sensitivity of 80.8%, specificity of 98%, LR+ of 17.1, and LR- of 0.18.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of H pylori antigen in stools with ELISA monoclonal antibodies is a noninvasive efficient test for diagnosis of infection in children. One-step tests showed low accuracy and more studies are needed to obtain a useful office-based screening test. The available molecular tests are still unreliable.

An alternative, sensitive method to detect Helicobacter pylori DNA in feces

BACKGROUND

 Despite the high sensitivity and specificity of PCR, detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA in feces is still challenging. Fecal samples contain inhibitory molecules that can prevent amplification of the target DNA. Even by using specific DNA extraction kits for stools, monitoring of infection by analyzing stool samples remains problematic and endorses the need for improved diagnostic methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The newly proposed method uses selective hybridization of target DNA with biotin-labeled probes, followed by DNA isolation with streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. After three washing steps, the purified DNA can be amplified immediately using conventional or quantitative PCR. In order to test this technique on biological samples, Mongolian gerbils were infected with H. pylori ATCC 43504 and fecal samples were analyzed on days 1, 4, and 10 post infection.

RESULTS

A detection limit of one bacterial cell per 100 mg stool sample was established, but only after removal of the magnetic beads from the target DNA by heating. This resulted in a 10-fold increase of sensitivity compared to a commercially available stool DNA extraction kit. Analysis of fecal samples from infected gerbils demonstrated the presence of H. pylori DNA on each time point, while the uninfected animal remained negative.

CONCLUSIONS

 The proposed technique allows detection of very low quantities of H. pylori DNA in biological samples. In laboratory animal models, detailed monitoring of infection and complete clearance of infection can be demonstrated thanks to the low detection limit.

Helicobacter pylori diagnostic tests in children: review of the literature from 1999 to 2009

The array of tests that can be used for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection is large, and it can be confusing to define which test to use particularly in children where results may not be comparable to those obtained in adult patients. Using PubMed, we reviewed the English literature from January 1999 to May 2009 to identify articles that determined sensitivity and specificity of H. pylori invasive and non-invasive diagnostic tests in children. We excluded articles that presented a review of the literature, abstracts, case reports, or series where children's results could not be separated from adult populations. Of the tissue based methods, rapid urease tests have better sensitivity than histology to detect presence of H. pylori; however, histology can detect the pathology associated with disease including gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and other conditions that could be the cause of the child's symptoms. Culture of gastric tissues or stool has 100% specificity but sensitivity is low. Of the serologic tests, immunoblot has the best sensitivity. The urea breath tests have >75% sensitivity for detection of H. pylori before and after treatment. Immunoassays in stool using monoclonal antibodies have >95% sensitivity for detection of H. pylori before and after treatment. PCR testing can be performed in tissue and stool samples and can detect genes associated to antibiotic resistance. In summary, the current commercial non-invasive tests have adequate sensitivity and specificity for detecting the presence of H. pylori; however, endoscopy with histopathology is the only method that can detect H. pylori and lesions associated with the infection.

Oral cavity is not a reservoir for Helicobacter pylori in infected patients with functional dyspepsia

INTRODUCTION

Helicobacter pylori infection is very prevalent in Brazil, infecting almost 65% of the population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of this bacterium in the oral cavity of patients with functional dyspepsia (epigastric pain syndrome), establish the main sites of infection in the mouth, and assess the frequency of cagA and vacA genotypes of oral H. pylori.

METHODS

All 43 outpatients with epigastric pain syndrome, who entered the study, were submitted to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy to rule out organic diseases. Helicobacter pylori infection in the stomach was confirmed by a rapid urease test and urea breath tests. Samples of saliva, the tongue dorsum and supragingival dental plaque were collected from the oral cavity of each subject and subgingival dental plaque samples were collected from the patients with periodontitis; H. pylori infection was verified by polymerase chain reaction using primers that amplify the DNA sequence of a species-specific antigen present in all H. pylori strains; primers that amplify a region of urease gene, and primers for cagA and vacA (m1, m2, s1a, s1b, s2) genotyping.

RESULTS

Thirty patients harbored H. pylori in the stomach, but it was not possible to detect H. pylori in any oral samples using P1/P2 and Urease A/B. The genotype cagA was also negative in all samples and vacA genotype could not be characterized (s-m-).

CONCLUSION

The oral cavity may not be a reservoir for H. pylori in patients with epigastric pain syndrome, the bacterium being detected exclusively in the stomach.

Evaluation of Helicobacter pylori Immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgA, and IgM serologic testing compared to stool antigen testing

The utility of Helicobacter pylori serology was evaluated in 4,722 specimens and compared to stool antigen detection. Immunoglobulin M (IgM) sensitivity (6.8%) was unacceptably low. Key performance differences were observed in IgG specificity, IgA sensitivity, and specificity between adults and children that may warrant differentiating optimal serologic cutoff values by age.

Helicobacter pylori: prevalence and relationship with abdominal pain in school children in Makkah City, western Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND/AIM

The published data on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) prevalence and its relationship with abdominal pain in Saudi Arabia is scarce. This study was carried out to determine the prevalence of H. pylori and its relationship with chronic recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) among school students in Makkah City, Saudi Arabia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three hundred and fourteen school students, 103 at the intermediate level (grades 7-9) aged 12-15 years and 211 at the secondary level (grades 10-12) aged 15-18 years were tested for H. pylori. Urea breath test (UBT) was used for this purpose. Children with chronic RAP were identified as per the Apley criteria.

RESULTS

Overall, the UBT was positive in 86/314 (27.4%) students. It was positive in 45/103 (43.7%) intermediate school students and 41/211 (19.4%) secondary students. Out of the 55 students with chronic RAP, 40 (73%) were positive for H. pylori. Further, 62.9% and 82.1% were positive among the intermediate and secondary school students with RAP, respectively. The overall and specific odds ratios of RAP were 12.35 [95% confidence interval (C.I.) 6.30-24.22] and 10.40 (95% C.I. 1.75-11.73) for the intermediate school students and 22.69 (95% C.I. 7.99-64.44) for the secondary school students.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of H. pylori among the school children in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, is relatively low compared with developing countries. The prevalence was found to be higher among the younger age group. Further, there was a significant relation between H. pylori infection and RAP among the school students.

Unreliability of results of PCR detection of Helicobacter pylori in clinical or environmental samples

The aim of this study was to compare published Helicobacter pylori primer pairs for their ability to reliably detect H. pylori in gastric biopsy specimens and salivary samples. Detection limits of the 26 PCR primer pairs previously described for detection of H. pylori DNA in clinical samples were determined. Sensitivity and specificity were determined using primers with detection limits of <100 CFU/ml using 50 H. pylori-positive and -negative (by concordance by culture and histology) coded gastric biopsy specimens. These results were then confirmed with gastric biopsy specimens and saliva from patients with confirmed H. pylori status. Five of the twenty-six previously reported primer pairs (HP64-f/HP64-r, HP1/HP2, EHC-U/EHC-L, VAG-F/VAG-R, and ICT37/ICT38) had detection limits of <100 CFU/ml in the presence of gastric tissue. None had 100% specificity or sensitivity; all produced false-positive results. The HP64-f/HP64-r for ureA and HP1/HP2 for 16S rRNA individually had sensitivities and specificities of >90% with gastric biopsy specimens. No combinations of primer pairs improved the results. Using these five primer pairs, 54% of the positive saliva samples were determined to be false positive; both the HP64-f/HP64-r and the HP1/HP2 sets produced false positives with saliva. We conclude that clinicians should not rely on results using current PCR primers alone to decide the H. pylori status of an individual patient or as a basis for treatment decisions. The results of studies based on PCR identification of H. pylori in environmental samples should be viewed with caution. Possibly, specific primers sets can be identified based on the presence of multiple putative virulence factor genes.

Antibody-based detection tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children: a meta-analysis

Background

Numerous serologic tests are available for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in children. Common designs of antibody-based detection tests are ELISA and Western Blot (WB). For developing countries with limited laboratory resources and access, ELISA would be the preferred method because of its simplicity, lower cost and speed. Although in adults ELISA has proven to be highly accurate in diagnosing H. pylori infection; in children, it has shown variable accuracy.

Methods/Findings

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the accuracy of antibody-based detection tests for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in children. Selection criteria included participation of at least 30 children and the use of a gold standard for H. pylori diagnosis. In a comprehensive search we identified 68 studies. Subgroup analyses were carried out by technique, immunoglobulin class, and source of test (commercial and in-house). The results demonstrated: 1) WB tests showed high overall performance, sensitivity 91.3% (95% CI, 88.9–93.3), specificity 89% (95% CI, 85.7–91.9), LR+ 8.2 (95% CI, 5.1–13.3), LR− 0.06 (95% CI, 0.02–0.16), DOR 158.8 (95% CI, 57.8–435.8); 2) ELISA-IgG assays showed low sensitivity 79.2% (95% CI, 77.3–81.0) and high specificity (92.4%, 95% CI, 91.6–93.3); 3) ELISA commercial tests varied widely in performance (test for heterogeneity p<0.0001); and 4) In-house ELISA with whole-cell antigen tests showed the highest overall performance: sensitivity 94% (95% CI, 90.2–96.7), specificity 96.4% (95% CI, 94.2–97.9), LR+ 19.9 (95% CI, 7.9–49.8), LR− 0.08 (95% CI, 0.04–0.15) DOR 292.8 (95% CI, 101.8–841.7).

Conclusions/Significance

WB test and in-house ELISA with whole-cell antigen tests are the most reliable tests for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in children. Antigens obtained from local strains of the community could partially explain the good overall accuracy of the in-house ELISA. Because of its cost and technical demands, in-house ELISA might be more suitable for use in developing countries.

Lack of diagnostic utility of specific immunoglobulin M in Helicobacter pylori infection in children

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection results in a systemic immune response characterized by the initial rise of immunoglobulin (Ig) M followed by the elevation of IgG- and IgA-specific antibody levels in serum. Age and regional considerations may modify the accuracy of serological tests.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the accuracy of specific IgG, IgA, and IgM in H pylori infection determination in different age groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 179 patients referred for endoscopy. Patients were considered infected if they had positive histological or urease test results for H pylori. Titers of IgG, IgA, and IgM were determined in serum by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Through receiver operator characteristic curves, cutoff, sensitivity, and specificity values were obtained. Agreement and correlation between immunoglobulin titers and inflammation markers were explored.

RESULTS

Infection with H pylori was present in 58% of adults, 62% of adolescents, and 25% of children. Sensitivity and specificity were higher in children younger than 12 years old for IgG and IgA. All diagnostic performance values were lower for IgM. Agreement measures were approximately 0.5 in adults and reached values of approximately 0.7 for adolescents and children. IgM had negative agreement with other methods. There was a correlation between inflammation markers, H pylori load, and immunoglobulin titers for IgG and IgA. These associations decreased with age and were not observed for IgM.

CONCLUSIONS

IgG and IgA serological tests reached high performance values, particularly in children younger than 12 years old, indicating that they are reasonable screening methods once cutoff values are adjusted to local population and age. IgM does not present an additional contribution.

Absence of Helicobacter pylori in the oral cavity of 10 non-dyspeptic subjects demonstrated by real-time polymerase chain reaction

Helicobacter pylori plays a significant role in gastric disease. However, the presence of this bacterium in the oral cavity remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to detect and quantify H. pylori in 29 different sites of the oral cavity in non-dyspeptic subjects by means of real-time polymerase chain reactions (PCR). Ten subjects without gastric symptoms were studied. Samples from unstimulated saliva, three sites of the tongue, oral mucosa, and 12 sites of both supragingival and subgingival plaque were collected from each subject. DNA was extracted from the oral samples and analysed for the presence of H. pylori by real-time PCR (LightCycler) using JW23/22 primers which targeted the 16S rRNA gene. DNA from H. pylori DSM 4867 was used as a positive control. Amplification efficiency for the LightCycler 2.0 runs ranged from 1.8 to 2.4. Melting curve analysis identified all the positive control capillaries, which contained H. pylori reference DNA, as a single and narrow peak at a melting temperature between 84.5 and 84.9 degrees C. All the negative control capillaries with no template control and the 29 oral samples from each subject showed either no melting peaks or broad melting peaks below 80 degrees C, which were considered as primer dimers. Therefore, H. pylori was not detected from any of the 290 oral samples. As a conclusion, H. pylori seems not to be permanently present in the oral cavity of a non-dyspeptic population.

Detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA by a simple stool PCR method in adult dyspeptic patients

INTRODUCTION

Helicobacter pylori is the major agent causing peptic ulcer, gastric cancer and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) gastric lymphoma. A simple stool polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was performed and compared with the gold standards for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 54 adult patients (mean age, 46.41 +/- 13.12 years) with dyspeptic symptoms from Gastroenterology at Dokuz Eylül University Hospital between May and November 2003 were included. Two antrum and corpus biopsies were taken from each patient. Infection by H. pylori was defined as positivity and negativity of the gold standards. DNA extraction of stool specimens was done using QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIAGEN) and PCR conditions included amplification and reamplification steps using the H. pylori ureA gene specific primers (HPU1, HPU2) and were visualized on 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide.

RESULTS

Forty-six of 54 patients (85.2%) were diagnosed positive and eight (14.8%) were negative for H. pylori infection by the gold standard methods. Thirty-two patients were positive (59.3%) and 22 of them (40.7%) were detected negative by stool PCR method. The stool PCR method and gold standard methods showed a statistical difference for the detection of H. pylori infection (p < .0001). Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, and positive and negative predictive values were 65.22%, 75%, 2.61%, 93.75%, and 27.7%, respectively.

DISCUSSION

The PCR on the stool specimens resulted as being a very specific test. We suggest that a simple stool PCR method that we developed can be used to detect H. pylori, virulence genes, and in drug resistance studies either first line diagnostic methods in the laboratory or in the clinical management of dyspeptic patients.

Pediatric gastric and duodenal disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides a summary of new developments regarding common diseases affecting the stomach and duodenum in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Celiac disease seems to be more prevalent than previously thought in different areas of the world, including the United States. The value of different serologic screening tools and other noninvasive tests has been carefully assessed. HLA-DQ typing has been proposed as part of celiac disease screening testing for high-risk groups. The use of the newly defined pediatric Rome criteria is allowing recognition of nonulcer (or functional) dyspepsia as an entity that affects a sizable subset of children. Testing of gastric sensory and motor function is clarifying the pathophysiology of this condition in children and adolescents. Intriguing data are also emerging about the possible role of mucosal eosinophils and disaccharidase deficiencies in causing dyspeptic symptoms. Intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin A represents a novel technique to treat gastroparesis. In refractory cases, the use of a gastric electric stimulator has shown to be beneficial in idiopathic and diabetic gastroparesis. Progress has been made in understanding the epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection in developing countries and its role in causing a wide spectrum of symptoms in children. Several noninvasive methods for its diagnosis have been established.

SUMMARY

Recent developments in the diagnosis and management of gastric and duodenal pathologic conditions are making a significant impact on pediatric clinical care. Future studies will likely continue to explore the use of minimally invasive testing and interventions in such conditions.

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

While there are some attempts to improve culture of Helicobacter pylori, molecular methods have been the main focus of this interest. Their main application concerns the development of rapid tests also allowing the determination of bacterial resistance, i.e. real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), or to genotype the strains. Attempts to improve, simplify or explain the discrepancies of urea breath test results have been made and new generation of stool antigen test with monoclonal antibodies either using the standard ELISA format or rapid immunoenzymatic detection have confirmed their value. With regard to serology, studies have mainly focused on the distinction of infections with more pathogenic strains and the ability to diagnose atrophic gastritis with the Gastropanel.