Characterization of infiltrating T cells in human scalp explants from alopecia areata to SCID nude mice: possible role of the disappearance of CD8+ T lymphocytes in the process of hair regrowth

A "hair-raising" history of alopecia areata

A 3500-year-old papyrus from ancient Egypt provides a list of treatments for many diseases including "bite hair loss," most likely alopecia areata (AA). The treatment of AA remained largely unchanged for over 1500 years. In 30 CE, Celsus described AA presenting as scalp alopecia in spots or the "windings of a snake" and suggested treatment with caustic compounds and scarification. The first "modern" description of AA came in 1813, though treatment still largely employed caustic agents. From the mid-19th century onwards, various hypotheses of AA development were put forward including infectious microbes (1843), nerve defects (1858), physical trauma and psychological stress (1881), focal inflammation (1891), diseased teeth (1902), toxins (1912) and endocrine disorders (1913). The 1950s brought new treatment developments with the first use of corticosteroid compounds (1952), and the first suggestion that AA was an autoimmune disease (1958). Research progressively shifted towards identifying hair follicle-specific autoantibodies (1995). The potential role of lymphocytes in AA was made implicit with immunohistological studies (1980s). However, studies confirming their functional role were not published until the development of rodent models (1990s). Genetic studies, particularly genome-wide association studies, have now come to the forefront and open up a new era of AA investigation (2000s). Today, AA research is actively focused on genetics, the microbiome, dietary modulators, the role of atopy, immune cell types in AA pathogenesis, primary antigenic targets, mechanisms by which immune cells influence hair growth, and of course the development of new treatments based on these discoveries.

Induction of alopecia areata in C3H/HeJ mice using polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly[I:C]) and interferon-gamma

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic, relapsing hair-loss disorder that is considered to be a T-cell-mediated autoimmune disease. Several animal models for AA have been created to investigate the pathophysiology and screen for effective therapeutic targets. As C3H/HeJ mice develop AA spontaneously in a low frequency, a novel animal model is needed to establish an AA-like condition faster and more conveniently. In this study, we present a novel non-invasive AA rodent model that avoids skin or lymph-node cell transfer. We simply injected C3H/HeJ mice subcutaneously with interferon-gamma (IFNγ) along with polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (poly[I:C]), a synthetic dsRNA, to initiate innate immunity via inflammasome activation. Approximately 80% of the IFNγ and poly(I:C) co-injected mice showed patchy AA lesions after 8 weeks. None of the mice displayed hair loss in the IFNγ or poly(I:C) solely injection group. Immunohistochemical staining of the AA lesions revealed increased infiltration of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ cells infiltration around the hair follicles. IFNγ and poly(I:C) increased the expression of NLRP3, IL-1β, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 in mouse skin. Taken together, these findings indicate a shorter and more convenient means of AA animal model induction and demonstrate that inflammasome-activated innate immunity is important in AA pathogenesis.

Abnormal interactions between perifollicular mast cells and CD8+ T-cells may contribute to the pathogenesis of alopecia areata

Alopecia areata (AA) is a CD8+ T-cell dependent autoimmune disease of the hair follicle (HF) in which the collapse of HF immune privilege (IP) plays a key role. Mast cells (MCs) are crucial immunomodulatory cells implicated in the regulation of T cell-dependent immunity, IP, and hair growth. Therefore, we explored the role of MCs in AA pathogenesis, focusing on MC interactions with CD8+ T-cells in vivo, in both human and mouse skin with AA lesions. Quantitative (immuno-)histomorphometry revealed that the number, degranulation and proliferation of perifollicular MCs are significantly increased in human AA lesions compared to healthy or non-lesional control skin, most prominently in subacute AA. In AA patients, perifollicular MCs showed decreased TGFβ1 and IL-10 but increased tryptase immunoreactivity, suggesting that MCs switch from an immuno-inhibitory to a pro-inflammatory phenotype. This concept was supported by a decreased number of IL-10+ and PD-L1+ MCs, while OX40L+, CD30L+, 4–1BBL+ or ICAM-1+ MCs were increased in AA. Lesional AA-HFs also displayed significantly more peri- and intrafollicular- CD8+ T-cells as well as more physical MC/CD8+ T-cell contacts than healthy or non-lesional human control skin. During the interaction with CD8+ T-cells, AA MCs prominently expressed MHC class I and OX40L, and sometimes 4–1BBL or ICAM-1, suggesting that MC may present autoantigens to CD8+ T-cells and/or co-stimulatory signals. Abnormal MC numbers, activities, and interactions with CD8+ T-cells were also seen in the grafted C3H/HeJ mouse model of AA and in a new humanized mouse model for AA. These phenomenological in vivo data suggest the novel AA pathobiology concept that perifollicular MCs are skewed towards pro-inflammatory activities that facilitate cross-talk with CD8+ T-cells in this disease, thus contributing to triggering HF-IP collapse in AA. If confirmed, MCs and their CD8+ T-cell interactions could become a promising new therapeutic target in the future management of AA.

What causes alopecia areata?

The pathobiology of alopecia areata (AA), one of the most frequent autoimmune diseases and a major unsolved clinical problem, has intrigued dermatologists, hair biologists and immunologists for decades. Simultaneously, both affected patients and the physicians who take care of them are increasingly frustrated that there is still no fully satisfactory treatment. Much of this frustration results from the fact that the pathobiology of AA remains unclear, and no single AA pathogenesis concept can claim to be universally accepted. In fact, some investigators still harbour doubts whether this even is an autoimmune disease, and the relative importance of CD8(+) T cells, CD4(+) T cells and NKGD2(+) NK or NKT cells and the exact role of genetic factors in AA pathogenesis remain bones of contention. Also, is AA one disease, a spectrum of distinct disease entities or only a response pattern of normal hair follicles to immunologically mediated damage? During the past decade, substantial progress has been made in basic AA-related research, in the development of new models for translationally relevant AA research and in the identification of new therapeutic agents and targets for future AA management. This calls for a re-evaluation and public debate of currently prevalent AA pathobiology concepts. The present Controversies feature takes on this challenge, hoping to attract more skin biologists, immunologists and professional autoimmunity experts to this biologically fascinating and clinically important model disease.

Failure of two TNF-alpha blockers to influence the course of alopecia areata

Alopecia areata is a form of hair loss believed to be due to an anti-hair-bulb autoimmune process in which CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes affect the peribulb area. Alopecia universalis is the most severe form of alopecia areata and manifests itself as a complete loss of all body hair. The authors present the case of a 44-year-old psoriasis patient with a 20-year history of alopecia universalis who failed to respond to etanercept in terms of skin psoriasis and alopecia universalis, while reporting improvement in arthropathy. While tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors succeeded in the treatment of some autoimmune disorders, reports of alopecia areata failures and this one of alopecia universalis demonstrate resistance to such treatment. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors seem to not represent an effective treatment modality for alopecia universalis. The understanding gained from this experience should redirect the aims of alopecia areata therapy toward alternate mechanistic interventions.

Restoration of hair growth with topical diphencyprone in mouse and rat models of alopecia areata

BACKGROUND

The contact sensitizer, diphencyprone (DPCP), is one of the most effective therapies for the more severe forms of alopecia areata (AA).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of topical DPCP on the 2 available rodent models for AA, and to determine the underlying therapeutic mechanisms.

METHODS

AA-affected mice and rats were treated unilaterally with topical DPCP on the ventral and dorsal surface, respectively. The opposite sides were treated with vehicle alone. Skin biopsy specimens were collected from both sides for histologic analysis.

RESULTS

Hair regrowth was observed on the treated sides in the majority of the animals of both species. Immunohistochemical analyses revealed reduction of intrafollicular CD8(+) lymphocyte infiltrates after successful treatment in mice.

CONCLUSION

The AA-like hair disorder of these 2 rodent models can be used as a tool for furthering our understanding of human AA and the therapeutic actions of DPCP.

Impaired responses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to T-cell stimulants in alopecia areata patients with a poor response to topical immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Topical immunotherapy with a contact allergen is effective in alopecia areata (AA). However, the mechanism of the effect is still unknown, and pretreatment prediction of the outcome of therapy in each patient remains difficult.

OBJECTIVES

To predict the clinical effect of this therapy in AA patients, we investigated the relationship between clinical responses to topical immunotherapy and in vitro proliferative responses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to T-cell stimulants.

METHODS

PBMC were taken from 67 AA patients before or during diphenylcyclopropenone immunotherapy and from 14 healthy controls, and proliferative responses to phytohaemagglutinin and staphylococcal enterotoxin B were evaluated by measuring [3H]-thymidine incorporation.

RESULTS

PBMC from the AA patients with a good clinical response to immunotherapy showed a normal level of proliferation, whereas PBMC from the poor responders showed a markedly suppressed proliferative response and interleukin (IL)-2 production, but increased IL-4 production compared with the controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The proliferative response of PBMC to T-cell stimulants may be one of the indicators of the clinical effect of topical immunotherapy for AA.