Interaction between DNMT1 and DNA replication reactions in the SV40 in vitro replication system

Non-nucleoside inhibitors of DNMT1 and DNMT3 for targeted cancer therapy

DNA methylation can deactivate tumor suppressor genes thus causing cancers. Two DNA methylation inhibitors have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and have entered clinical use. However, these inhibitors are nucleoside analogues that can be incorporated into DNA or RNA and induce significant side effects. DNMT1 and DNMT3 are key enzymes involved in DNA methylation. In the acute myeloid leukemia model, a non-nucleoside DNMT1-specific inhibitor has shown lower toxicity and improved pharmacokinetics compared to traditional nucleoside drugs. DNMT3 is also implicated in certain specific cancers. Thus, developing non-nucleoside inhibitors for DNMT1 or DNMT3 can help in understanding their roles in carcinogenesis and provide targeted treatment options in certain cancers. Although no non-nucleoside inhibitors have yet entered clinical trials, in this review, we focus on DNMT1 or DNMT3 selective inhibitors. For DNMT1 selective inhibitors, we have compiled information on the repurposed drugs, derivative compounds and selective inhibitors identified through virtual screening. Additionally, we have outlined potential targets for DNMT1, including protein-protein complex, RNA mimics and aptamers. Compared to DNMT1, research on DNMT3-specific inhibitors has been less extensive. In this context, our exploration has identified a limited number of molecular inhibitors, and we have proposed specific long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) as potential contributors to the selective inhibition of DNMT3. This collective effort aims to offer valuable insights into the development of non-nucleoside inhibitors that selectively target DNMT1 or DNMT3.

High throughput screening identifies SOX2 as a super pioneer factor that inhibits DNA methylation maintenance at its binding sites

Binding of mammalian transcription factors (TFs) to regulatory regions is hindered by chromatin compaction and DNA methylation of their binding sites. Nevertheless, pioneer transcription factors (PFs), a distinct class of TFs, have the ability to access nucleosomal DNA, leading to nucleosome remodelling and enhanced chromatin accessibility. Whether PFs can bind to methylated sites and induce DNA demethylation is largely unknown. Using a highly parallelized approach to investigate PF ability to bind methylated DNA and induce DNA demethylation, we show that the interdependence between DNA methylation and TF binding is more complex than previously thought, even within a select group of TFs displaying pioneering activity; while some PFs do not affect the methylation status of their binding sites, we identified PFs that can protect DNA from methylation and others that can induce DNA demethylation at methylated binding sites. We call the latter super pioneer transcription factors (SPFs), as they are seemingly able to overcome several types of repressive epigenetic marks. Finally, while most SPFs induce TET-dependent active DNA demethylation, SOX2 binding leads to passive demethylation, an activity enhanced by the co-binding of OCT4. This finding suggests that SPFs could interfere with epigenetic memory during DNA replication.

FEN1 mediates miR-200a methylation and promotes breast cancer cell growth via MET and EGFR signaling

Flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) is recognized as a pivotal factor in DNA replication, long-patch excision repair, and telomere maintenance. Excessive FEN1 expression has been reported to be closely associated with cancer progression, but the specific mechanism has not yet been explored. In the present study, we demonstrated that FEN1 promoted breast cancer cell proliferation via an epigenetic mechanism of FEN1-mediated up-regulation of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT)1 and DNMT3a. FEN1 was proved to interact with DNMT3a through proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) to suppress microRNA (miR)-200a-5p expression mediated by methylation. Furthermore, miR-200a-5p was identified to repress breast cancer cell proliferation by inhibiting the expression of its target genes, hepatocyte growth factor (MET), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Overall, our data surprisingly demonstrate that FEN1 promotes breast cancer cell growth via the formation of FEN1/PCNA/DNMT3a complex to inhibit miR-200a expression by DNMT-mediated methylation and to recover the target genes expression of miR-200a, MET, and EGFR. The novel epigenetic mechanism of FEN1 on proliferation promotion provides a significant clue that FEN1 might serve as a predictive biomarker and therapeutic target for breast cancer.-Zeng, X., Qu, X., Zhao, C., Xu, L., Hou, K., Liu, Y., Zhang, N., Feng, J., Shi, S., Zhang, L., Xiao, J., Guo, Z., Teng, Y., Che, X. FEN1 mediates miR-200a methylation and promotes breast cancer cell growth via MET and EGFR signaling.

Specific or not specific recruitment of DNMTs for DNA methylation, an epigenetic dilemma

Our current view of DNA methylation processes is strongly moving: First, even if it was generally admitted that DNMT3A and DNMT3B are associated with de novo methylation and DNMT1 is associated with inheritance DNA methylation, these distinctions are now not so clear. Secondly, since one decade, many partners of DNMTs have been involved in both the regulation of DNA methylation activity and DNMT recruitment on DNA. The high diversity of interactions and the combination of these interactions let us to subclass the different DNMT-including complexes. For example, the DNMT3L/DNMT3A complex is mainly related to de novo DNA methylation in embryonic states, whereas the DNMT1/PCNA/UHRF1 complex is required for maintaining global DNA methylation following DNA replication. On the opposite to these unspecific DNA methylation machineries (no preferential DNA sequence), some recently identified DNMT-including complexes are recruited on specific DNA sequences. The coexistence of both types of DNA methylation (un/specific) suggests a close cooperation and an orchestration between these systems to maintain genome and epigenome integrities. Deregulation of these systems can lead to pathologic disorders.

The applications of single-cell genomics

We all start out as a single totipotent cell that is programmed to produce a multicellular organism. How do individual cells make those complex developmental switches? How do single cells within a tissue or organ differ, how do they coordinate their actions or go astray in a disease process? These are long-standing and fundamental questions in biology that are now becoming tractable because of advances in microfluidics, DNA amplification and DNA sequencing. Methods for studying single-cell transcriptomes (or at least the polyadenylated mRNA fraction of it) are by far the furthest ahead and reveal remarkable heterogeneity between morphologically identical cells. The analysis of genomic DNA variation is not far behind. The other 'omics' of single cells pose greater technological obstacles, but they are progressing and promise to yield highly integrated large data sets in the near future.