Predictors of response to exemestane as primary endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

ERK1/2-RSK2 Signaling in Regulation of ERα-Mediated Responses

Signaling via extracellular regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) and p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK), a downstream effector, mediates numerous processes. For example, ERK1/2-RSK signaling is essential for estrogen homeostasis in the mammary gland and uterus to maintain physiological responsiveness. This review will focus on the coordination of ERK1/2-RSK2 and estrogen signaling through estrogen receptor alpha (ERα). The interrelationship and the feedback mechanisms between these pathways occurs at the level of transcription, translation, and posttranslational modification. Identifying how ERK1/2-RSK2 and estrogen signaling cooperate in homeostasis and disease may lead to novel therapeutic approaches in estrogen-dependent disorders.

PKNOX2 suppresses gastric cancer through the transcriptional activation of IGFBP5 and p53

Promoter methylation plays a vital role in tumorigenesis through transcriptional silencing of tumor suppressive genes. Using genome-wide methylation array, we first identified PBX/Knotted Homeobox 2 (PKNOX2) as a candidate tumor suppressor in gastric cancer. PKNOX2 mRNA expression is largely silenced in gastric cancer cell lines and primary gastric cancer via promoter methylation. Promoter methylation of PKNOX2 was associated with poor survival in gastric cancer patients. A series of in vitro and in vivo functional studies revealed that PKNOX2 functions as a tumor suppressor. Ectopic PKNOX2 expression inhibited cell proliferation in GC cell lines and suppressed growth of tumor xenografts in mice via induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest; and suppressed cell migration and invasion by blocking epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. On the other hand, knockdown PKNOX2 in normal gastric epithelial cells triggered diverse malignant phenotypes. Mechanistically, PKNOX2 exerts its tumor suppressive effect by promoting the up-regulation of Insulin like Growth Factor Binding Protein 5 (IGFBP5) and TP53. PKNOX2 binds to the promoter regions of IGFBP5 and TP53 and transcriptionally activated their expression by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-PCR assay. IGFBP5 knockdown partly abrogated tumor suppressive effect of PKNOX2, indicating that the function(s) of PKNOX2 are dependent on IGFBP5. IGFBP5 promoted PKNOX2-mediated up-regulation of p53. As a consequence, p53 transcription target genes were coordinately up-regulated in PKNOX2-expressing GC cells, leading to tumor suppression. In summary, our results identified PKNOX2 as a tumor suppressor in gastric cancer by activation of IGFBP5 and p53 signaling pathways. PKNOX2 promoter hypermethylation might be a biomarker for the poor survival of gastric cancer patients.

Deregulation of IGF-binding proteins -2 and -5 contributes to the development of endocrine resistant breast cancer in vitro

Tamoxifen (TAM) remains the adjuvant therapy of choice for pre-menopausal women with ERα-positive breast cancer. Resistance and recurrence remain, however, a major challenge with many women relapsing and subsequently dying. The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis is involved in breast cancer pathogenesis and progression to endocrine resistant disease, but there is very little data on the expression and potential role of IGF-binding proteins (IGFBP) during acquisition of the resistant phenotype. The aim of this study was to determine the expression and functional role of IGFBP-2 and -5 in the development of TAM resistance (TamR) in vitro and to test retrospectively whether they were predictive of resistance in a tissue microarray of 77 women with primary breast cancers who relapsed on/after endocrine therapy and 193 who did not with long term follow up. Reciprocal expression of IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-5 was observed at both mRNA and protein level in TamR cells. IGFBP-2 expression was increased by 10-fold while IGFBP-5 was decreased by 100-fold, compared to TAM-sensitive control cells. shRNA-mediated silencing of IGFBP-2 in TamR cells restored TAM sensitivity suggesting a causal role for this gene in TamR. While silencing of IGFBP-5 in control cells had no effect on TAM sensitivity, it significantly increased the migratory capacity of these cells. Quantitative image analysis of immunohistochemical data failed, however, to demonstrate an effect of IGFBP2 expression in endocrine-relapsed patients. Likewise, IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-5 expression failed to show any significant associations with survival either in patients relapsing or those not relapsing on/after endocrine therapy. By contrast, in silico mining of a separate published dataset showed that in patients who received endocrine treatment, loss of expression of IGBP-5 was significantly associated with worse survival. Overall these data suggest that co-ordinated and reciprocal alteration in IGFBP-2 and −5 expression may play a role in the acquisition of endocrine resistance.

Prognostic and predictive importance of the estrogen receptor coactivator AIB1 in a randomized trial comparing adjuvant letrozole and tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer: the Danish cohort of BIG 1-98

PURPOSE

To evaluate the estrogen receptor coactivator amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) as a prognostic marker, as well as a predictive marker for response to adjuvant tamoxifen and/or aromatase inhibitors, in early estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

METHOD

AIB1 was analyzed with immunohistochemistry in tissue microarrays of the Danish subcohort (N = 1396) of the International Breast Cancer Study Group's trial BIG 1-98 (randomization between adjuvant tamoxifen versus letrozole versus the sequence of the two drugs).

RESULTS

Forty-six percent of the tumors had a high AIB1 expression. In line with previous studies, AIB1 correlated to a more aggressive tumor-phenotype (HER2 amplification and a high malignancy grade). High AIB1 also correlated to higher estrogen receptor expression (80-100 vs. 1-79%), and ductal histological type. High AIB1 expression was associated with a poor disease-free survival (univariable: hazard ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.63. Multivariable: hazard ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.58) and overall survival (univariable: hazard ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.68. Multivariable: hazard ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.60). HER2 did not seem to modify the prognostic effect of AIB1. No difference in treatment effect between tamoxifen and letrozole in relation to AIB1 was found.

CONCLUSIONS

In a subset of the large international randomized trial BIG 1-98, we confirm AIB1 to be a strong prognostic factor in early breast cancer. Hence, although tumor AIB1 expression does not seem to be useful for the choice of tamoxifen versus an aromatase inhibitor in postmenopausal endocrine-responsive breast cancer, AIB1 is an interesting target for new anti-cancer therapies and further investigations of this biomarker is warranted.

Tumor biology in estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative breast cancer: Mind the menopausal status

Breast cancer is not one disease, but can be categorized into four major molecular subtypes according to hormone receptor [estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR)] and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) expression status. Ki67 labeling index and/or multigene assays are used to classify ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer into luminal A and luminal B (HER2-negative) subtypes. To date, most studies analyzing predictive or prognostic factors in ER-positive breast cancer have been performed in postmenopausal women, mainly using patients and samples in adjuvant aromatase inhibitor trials. In contrast, even the clinical roles of PgR and Ki67 have been little analyzed so far in premenopausal women. PgR is one of the estrogen-responsive genes, and it has been reported that plasma estradiol levels are related to expression levels of estrogen-responsive genes including PGR in ER-positive breast cancer. In this article, biological differences, especially differences in expression of PgR and Ki67 in ER-positive breast cancer between pre- and postmenopausal women are discussed. Clinical roles of PgR and Ki67 in ER-positive breast cancer differ between pre- and postmenopausal women. We suggest that the mechanisms of development and estrogen-dependent growth of ER-positive breast cancer might differ according to menopausal status.

Detection of PIK3CA gene mutations with HRM analysis and association with IGFBP-5 expression levels in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the second most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer deaths in women. Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway mutations are associated with cancer and phosphatidylinositol-4, 5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) gene mutations have been observed in 25-45% of breast cancer samples. Insulin growth factor binding protein-5 (IGFBP-5) can show different effects on apoptosis, cell motility and survival in breast cancer. We here aimed to determine the association between PIK3CA gene mutations and IGFBP-5 expressions for the first time in breast cancer patients. Frozen tumor samples from 101 Turkish breast cancer patients were analyzed with high resolution melting (HRM) for PIK3CA mutations (exon 9 and exon 20) and 37 HRM positive tumor samples were analyzed by DNA sequencing, mutations being found in 31. PIK3CA exon 9 mutations (Q546R, E542Q, E545K, E542K and E545D) were found in 10 tumor samples, exon 20 mutations (H1047L, H1047R, T1025T and G1049R) in 21, where only 1 tumor sample had two exon 20 mutations (T1025T and H1047R). Moreover, we detected one sample with both exon 9 (E542Q) and exon 20 (H1047R) mutations. 35% of the tumor samples with high IGFBP-5 mRNA expression and 29.4% of the tumor samples with low IGFBP-5 mRNA expression had PIK3CA mutations (p=0.9924). This is the first study of PIK3CA mutation screening results in Turkish breast cancer population using HRM analysis. This approach appears to be a very effective and reliable screening method for the PIK3CA exon 9 and 20 mutation detection. Further analysis with a greater number of samples is needed to clarify association between PIK3CA gene mutations and IGFBP-5 mRNA expression, and also clinical outcome in breast cancer patients.

IGFBP-2 and -5: important regulators of normal and neoplastic mammary gland physiology

The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis plays an important role in mammary gland physiology. In addition, dysregulation of this molecular axis may have a causal role in the aetiology and development of breast cancer (BC). This report discusses the IGF axis in normal and neoplastic mammary gland with special reference to IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs) -2 and -5. We describe how these high affinity binders of IGF-1 and IGF-2 may regulate local actions of growth factors in an autocrine and/or paracrine manner and how they also have IGF-independent effects in mammary gland. We discuss clinical studies which investigate both the prognostic value of IGFBP-2 and -5 expression in BC and possible involvement of these genes in the development of resistance to adjuvant endocrine therapies.

Activation of mTOR/S6K But Not MAPK Pathways Might Be Associated With High Ki-67, ER(+), and HER2(-) Breast Cancer

We determined the activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways in 108 cases of estrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer with high and low Ki-67 expression. The expression levels of Ki-67, p53, phosphorylated MAPK (pMAPK), and protein S6 (pS6; downstream molecule of PI3K/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin/S6 kinase pathway) were determined immunohistochemically. pS6 positivity, but not pMAPK positivity, was significantly associated with the high Ki-67 expression subset.

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of luminal A and luminal B characteristics of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer is considered important. Although the phosphoinositide 3 kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways are thought to be involved in the luminal B subtype, the details of their contribution to breast cancer remain unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We determined the activation of these pathways (phosphorylated MAPK [pMAPK] and protein S6 [pS6; a downstream molecule of PI3K/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)/S6 kinase (S6K)]) in 108 ER(+), HER2(-) breast cancer cases with high and low Ki-67 expression. The ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), Ki-67, p53 expression levels were also determined immunohistochemically. The cutoff value for Ki-67 was set at 15%.

RESULTS

A significantly greater percentage of cancer cases with high Ki-67 expression showed pS6 positivity than did those with low Ki-67 expression (53.2% vs. 19.7%; P = .0003). No significant differences were found between the cases with high and low expression levels were detected for p53 (23.4% vs. 11.5%; P = .12) or pMAPK (36.2% vs. 34.4%; P = .85) positivity. Multivariate analysis showed that pS6 positivity (odds ratio 5.16, 95% confidence interval 1.95-13.63; P = .0009), nuclear grade 2 and 3, and low PgR expression (≤ 20%) were independently associated with the high Ki-67 subset.

CONCLUSION

From our findings, we have concluded that the pS6 expression level is associated with the characteristics of breast cancer with high Ki-67 expression. Because these associations were observed, irrespective of menopausal status, the biologic difference seems to be less affected by estrogen signaling than by activation of S6 protein, especially in terms of proliferation. Our findings have also indicated that targeting the mTOR/S6K pathway might be a useful strategy for the treatment of ER(+)/HER2(-) breast cancer with high Ki-67 expression.

Differential subcellular and extracellular localisations of proteins required for insulin-like growth factor- and extracellular matrix-induced signalling events in breast cancer progression

Background

Cancer metastasis is the main contributor to breast cancer fatalities as women with the metastatic disease have poorer survival outcomes than women with localised breast cancers. There is an urgent need to develop appropriate prognostic methods to stratify patients based on the propensities of their cancers to metastasise. The insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I: IGF binding protein (IGFBP):vitronectin complexes have been shown to stimulate changes in gene expression favouring increased breast cancer cell survival and a migratory phenotype. We therefore investigated the prognostic potential of these IGF- and extracellular matrix (ECM) interaction-induced proteins in the early identification of breast cancers with a propensity to metastasise using patient-derived tissue microarrays.

Methods

Semiquantitative immunohistochemistry analyses were performed to compare the extracellular and subcellular distribution of IGF- and ECM-induced signalling proteins among matched normal, primary cancer and metastatic cancer formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tissue samples.

Results

The IGF- and ECM-induced signalling proteins were differentially expressed between subcellular and extracellular localisations. Vitronectin and IGFBP-5 immunoreactivity was lower while β₁ integrin immunoreactivity was higher in the stroma surrounding metastatic cancer tissues, as compared to normal breast and primary cancer stromal tissues. Similarly, immunoreactive stratifin was found to be increased in the stroma of primary as well as metastatic breast tissues. Immunoreactive fibronectin and β₁ integrin was found to be highly expressed at the leading edge of tumours. Based on the immunoreactivity it was apparent that the cell signalling proteins AKT1 and ERK1/2 shuffled from the nucleus to the cytoplasm with tumour progression.

Conclusion

This is the first in-depth, compartmentalised analysis of the distribution of IGF- and ECM-induced signalling proteins in metastatic breast cancers. This study has provided insights into the changing pattern of cellular localisation and expression of IGF- and ECM-induced signalling proteins in different stages of breast cancer. The differential distribution of these biomarkers could provide important prognostic and predictive indicators that may assist the clinical management of breast disease, namely in the early identification of cancers with a propensity to metastasise, and/or recur following adjuvant therapy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-627) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Differential expression of progesterone receptor, FOXA1, GATA3, and p53 between pre- and postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

Estrogen receptor (ER) is essential for estrogen-dependent growth, and its level of expression is considered a crucial determinant of response to endocrine therapy and prognosis in ER-positive breast cancer. On the other hand, the clinical role of progesterone receptor (PgR) in ER-positive breast cancer remains controversial, although testing of PgR by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has become routine. Recent studies indicated that plasma estradiol levels were related to the expression levels of estrogen-responsive genes in ER-positive breast cancer tissues in both pre- and postmenopausal women. In this study, we analyzed the expression levels of estrogen-responsive genes (PgR and TFF1), a progesterone-responsive gene (RANKL), ER-related genes (FOXA1 and GATA3), HER2, Ki67 and p53 in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer tissues by IHC. Correlations between the expression levels of these molecular markers and clinicopathological factors, including prognosis, were compared between pre- and postmenopausal women. Serum levels of estrone, estradiol, progesterone, and testosterone were also measured. Expression levels of PgR, TFF1, RANKL, and GATA3 were significantly higher in premenopausal women than in postmenopausal women. Serum estradiol levels were positively correlated with Ki67 labeling index (LI) in premenopausal women, but not in postmenopausal women. High expression of FOXA1 and GATA3 was significantly associated with improved disease-free survival in premenopausal women, but not in postmenopausal women, whereas high expression of PgR and low expression of p53 were significantly correlated with the improved disease-free survival in postmenopausal women, but not in premenopausal women. Moreover, the best cutoff points of Ki67 LI for disease-free survival were 30 % for premenopausal women and 14 % for postmenopausal women. Expression levels of ER, TFF1, and RANKL were not associated with the disease-free survival in either pre- or postmenopausal women. Our results suggest that the mechanisms of development and estrogen-dependent growth of ER-positive breast cancer might differ according to menopausal status.

STAT signaling in different breast cancer sub-types

This review summarizes information on expression of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT)s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5a/b and 6 in cancer cells from different human breast cancer sub-types. STAT proteins, especially STATs 1, 3 and 5a/b are expressed in some but not all cancers from all of the different major breast cancer sub-types. However, well-designed studies comparing expression patterns at the protein level in cancer and surrounding stromal cells are still needed to fully examine links with prognosis and therapeutic response. Moreover, it is not yet known if distinct expression patterns of STAT proteins could have dissimilar impacts in different sub-types, especially between the luminal A and B ER+ sub-types and the different TNBC sub-types. Recent data indicating that STAT 5 can be activated secondary to a therapeutic intervention and mediate resistance suggests that expression patterns should not only be examined in pre-treatment but also post-treatment samples from different sub-types.

p53 accumulation is a strong predictor of recurrence in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors

Aromatase inhibitors have played a central role in endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. However, factors predictive of the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors, and prognostic factors, both for early and late recurrence in women treated with adjuvant aromatase inhibitors have not been identified. Whole genome analysis identified that a TP53 gene mutation exists in ER-positive breast cancers, although the frequency of TP53 gene mutation in luminal tumors is lower compared with basal-like or human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancers. We examined expression of p53, as well as ER, progesterone receptor, HER2 and Ki-67 using immunohistochemistry in postmenopausal ER-positive breast cancer patients who were treated with aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant endocrine therapy. There were 53 (21%) tumors that contained 10% or more p53-positive cells. High p53 expression was positively correlated with tumor grade, HER2 score and Ki-67 expression. Significant association was observed between disease-free survival and high p53 expression in multivariate analysis (P < 0.0001). Compared with women without recurrence, women with early recurrence had significantly higher p53 expression (P < 0.0001), as did women with late recurrence (P = 0.037). The present study demonstrates that p53 accumulation is a strong predictor of both early and late recurrence in ER-positive breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant endocrine therapy. TP53 gene alteration might be a key biological characteristic of ER-positive breast cancer.

FOXA1 expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a prognostic marker in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have indicated that the response to chemotherapy and the prognostic impact of a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy differ among breast cancer subtypes. Predictors of response to chemotherapy and prognostic factors for survival might be different in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer.

METHODS

Women with Stage II to III ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer treated with anthracycline and taxane-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2003 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Expression of forkhead box A1 (FOXA1), B cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) and microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) as well as ER, progesterone receptor, HER2 and Ki67 was examined by immunohistochemistry in pre- and post-treatment specimens. Factors predictive of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and distant disease-free survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Tumor grade was positively correlated with Ki67 expression. Expression levels of ER were positively correlated with expression levels of HER2, BCL2, FOXA1 and MAPT in pre-treatment tumors. The Ki67 labeling index was the only factor that was significantly associated with clinical response measured by the reduction of tumor volume and pCR. Lymph node status, expression of ER before neoadjuvant chemotherapy and expression of FOXA1 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with distant disease-free survival, both by univariate and multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer should be selected for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. FOXA1 expression could be a prognostic marker in ER-positive breast cancer.

Prognostic significance of pathologic complete response and Ki67 expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have indicated that response to chemotherapy and the prognostic impact of a pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy differ among breast cancer subtypes.

METHODS

Women with Stage I to III breast cancer treated with anthracycline and taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (four cycles of docetaxel every 3 weeks followed by four cycles of FEC every 3 weeks) between 2006 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Trastuzumab was concurrently added to docetaxel for HER2-positive breast cancer. Expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), HER2, and Ki67 was examined by immunohistochemistry in pre- and post-treatment specimens. Predictive factors for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis were analyzed by breast cancer subtype.

RESULTS

Of 64 patients, 30 (47 %) were ER-positive (ER+) HER2-negative (HER2-), including eight as luminal A (Ki67 labeling index (LI) <14 %) and 22 as luminal B (Ki67 LI ≥ 14 %) subtypes, 11 (17 %) were ER+ HER2-positive (HER2+), 12 (19 %) were ER-negative (ER-) HER2+, and 11 (17 %) were ER- HER2-. The clinical response rates were significantly higher in luminal B, ER+ HER2+, and ER- HER2+ subtypes compared with luminal A subtype. Patients whose tumors contained high Ki67 expression effectively responded to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ki67 LI was a predictive marker for pCR, and all patients whose tumors achieved pCR are currently disease-free. Furthermore, high Ki67 expression in post-treatment tumors was strongly correlated with poor disease-free and overall survival regardless of subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

It is necessary to establish additional strategies to improve survival for patients whose residual tumors show high Ki67 expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Microbial transformation of anti-cancer steroid exemestane and cytotoxicity of its metabolites against cancer cell lines

Background

Microbial transformation of steroids has been extensively used for the synthesis of steroidal drugs, that often yield novel analogues, not easy to obtain by chemical synthesis. We report here fungal transformation of a synthetic steroidal drug, exemestane, used for the treatment of breast cancer and function through inhibition of aromatase enzyme.

Results

Microbial transformation of anti-cancer steroid, exemestane (1), was investigated by using two filamentous fungi. Incubation of 1 with fungi Macrophomina phaseolina, and Fusarium lini afforded three new, 11α-hydroxy-6-methylene-androsta-1, 4-diene-3,17-dione (2), 16β, 17β-dihydroxy-6-methylene-androsta-1, 4-diene-3-one (3), and 17β-hydroxy-6-methylene-androsta-1, 4-diene-3, 16-dione (4), and one known metabolites, 17β-hydroxy-6-methylene-androsta-1, 4-diene-3-one (5). Their structures were deduced spectroscopically. Compared to 1 (steroidal aromatase inactivator), the transformed metabolites were also evaluated for cytotoxic activity by using a cell viability assay against cancer cell lines (HeLa and PC3). Metabolite 2 was found to be moderately active against both the cell lines.

Conclusions

Biotransformation of exemestane (1) provides an efficient method for the synthesis of new analogues of 1. The metabolites were obtained as a result of reduction of double bond and hydroxylation. The transformed product 2 exhibited a moderate activity against cancer cell lines (HeLa and PC3). These transformed products can be studied for their potential as drug candidates.

A mechanistic study of the effect of doxorubicin/adriamycin on the estrogen response in a breast cancer model

OBJECTIVE

Estrogen treatment limits the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer cell lines, suggesting that estrogen pathway signaling may confer chemotherapeutic resistance. This study investigates the molecular responses of ER+ breast cancer cell lines to the chemotherapeutic agent, doxorubicin, in the presence or absence of estrogen.

METHODS

ER+ MCF-7 and T47-D cells were cultured in hormone-starved or estrogen-containing media with or without doxorubicin at concentrations mimicking the low concentrations seen in plasma and tumor microenvironments in humans following typical bolus administration. Protein levels, phosphorylations, and interactions of estrogen-signaling molecules were assessed following these treatments, as well the effects of ER signaling inhibitors on cell proliferation.

RESULTS

Surprisingly, estrogen and doxorubicin co-treatment markedly induced pro-growth alterations compared to doxorubicin alone and modestly enhanced estrogen alone-induced changes. Several inhibitors suppressed cell proliferation in the presence of doxorubicin and estrogen.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that molecular changes caused by doxorubicin in ER+ breast cancer cells can be reversed by estrogen, providing molecular evidence for the poorer responses of ER+ tumors to doxorubicin in the presence of physiologic estrogen levels. Our results also suggest that the addition of drugs targeting the ER, EGFR, the SFKs, MEK, PI3K, and/or the MMP proteins to a conventional chemotherapy regimen may improve chemosensitivity.

Can predictive biomarkers in breast cancer guide adjuvant endocrine therapy?

Personalized medicine for oestrogen receptor-α (ERα)-positive breast cancer requires predictive biomarkers for broad endocrine resistance as well as biomarkers capable of predicting resistance to a specific agent. In addition, biomarkers could be used to select patients that might benefit from the addition of treatments that do not target ERα. However, biomarker identification studies seem to be far from consistent and identified biomarkers seldom face an introduction into clinical practice. Importantly, most of the studies that seek to identify biomarkers have been performed using material from consecutive series of patients treated with tamoxifen (the most commonly prescribed ERα antagonist). Consequently, the predictive value of any biomarker identified is confounded by its prognostic value. Another important issue is the lack of differentiation between premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with breast cancer. The hormonal environment of a tumour in patients who are premenopausal is intrinsically distinct from those arising in postmenopausal women. Biomarkers of different biological mechanisms might enable the prediction of either broad endocrine resistance or resistance to a specific agent in each of these patient subtypes. Ultimately, improvements to study design are needed to establish the clinical validity of the most promising biomarkers to predict benefit from endocrine therapy.

The role of AIB1 in breast cancer

Amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) is a member of the p160 steroid receptor coactivator family that mediates the transcriptional activities of nuclear receptors including estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), as well as certain other transcription factors, including E2F1 and p53. AIB1 is widely implicated in nuclear receptor-mediated diseases, particularly malignant diseases, including breast, prostate, gastric and pancreatic cancers. AIB1 was initially implicated in hormone-dependent breast cancer, where increasing levels of AIB1 mRNA and protein were detected in some of these specimens and the overexpression of AIB1 in mice led to an increased incidence of tumors. More recent studies revealed that AIB1 also affects the growth of hormone-independent breast cancer via signaling pathways such as those of E2F1, IGF-I, EGF and PI3K/Akt/mTOR. The pleiotropic effect of AIB1 and the roles it plays in both normal development and cancer have presented a great challenge to formulating an effective therapeutic strategy for breast cancer. In this review, we highlight the significant progress made with the recent findings and present an overview of the current understanding of the influence of AIB1 on breast cancer via hormone-dependent and -independent signaling pathways.

Specific transcriptional response of four blockers of estrogen receptors on estradiol-modulated genes in the mouse mammary gland

Novel agents for the endocrine therapy of breast cancer are needed, especially in order to take advantage of the multiple consecutive responses observed in metastatic progressing breast cancer following previous hormone therapy, thus delaying the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy with its frequent poor tolerance and serious side effects. Acolbifene (ACOL) is a novel and unique antiestrogen which represents a unique opportunity to achieve the most potent and specific blockade of estrogen action in the mammary gland and uterus while exerting estrogen-like beneficial effects in other tissues, especially the bones. To better understand the specificity of action of ACOL, we have used Affymetrix GeneChips containing 45,000 probe sets to analyze 34,000 genes to determine the specificity of this compound compared to the pure antiestrogen fulvestrant, as well as to the mixed antagonists/agonists tamoxifen and raloxifene to block the effect of estradiol (E(2)) and to induce effects of their own on the genomic profile in the mouse mammary gland. The genes modulated by E(2) were those identified in two separate experiments and validated by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Three hours after the single subcutaneous injection of E(2) (0.05 μg), the simultaneous administration of ACOL, fulvestrant, tamoxifen, and raloxifene blocked by 98, 61, 43, and 92 % the number of E(2)-upregulated genes, respectively. On the other hand, 70, 10, 25, and 55 % of the genes down-regulated by E(2) were blocked by the same compounds. Of the 128 genes modulated by E(2), 49 are associated with tumorigenesis while 22 are known to be associated with breast cancer. When used alone, ACOL modulated the smallest number of genes also influenced by E(2), namely 4 %, thus possibly explaining potential utilities of this compound in breast cancer prevention and therapy.

The Role of Androgen Receptor in Breast Cancer

The androgen receptor (AR) is a proven clinical target in prostate cancer. Recent research indicates that it is an emerging hormonal target in breast cancer as well, with potential clinical benefit in both estrogen receptor(ER) positive and negative tumors. Compared to the ER, AR contains unique functional domains with relevance to its altered role in human breast cancer. The majority of ER-positive tumors express AR, and a significant percentage of ER-negative tumors might benefit from combined targeting of AR and the ErbB2/HER2 oncogene. Signaling downstream of AR might also affect many clinically important pathways which are also emerging clinical targets in breast cancer. AR expression might also play a role during tumor progression to metastatic disease. The role of AR as a new important biomarker in breast cancer will be reviewed herein.

AIB1:ERα transcriptional activity is selectively enhanced in aromatase inhibitor-resistant breast cancer cells

PURPOSE

The use of aromatase inhibitors (AI) in the treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, postmenopausal breast cancer has proven efficacy. However, inappropriate activation of ER target genes has been implicated in the development of resistant tumors. The ER coactivator protein AIB1 has previously been associated with initiation of breast cancer and resistance to endocrine therapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Here, we investigated the role of AIB1 in the deregulation of ER target genes occurring as a consequence of AI resistance using tissue microarrays of patients with breast cancer and cell line models of resistance to the AI letrozole.

RESULTS

Expression of AIB1 associated with disease recurrence (P = 0.025) and reduced disease-free survival time (P = 0.0471) in patients treated with an AI as first-line therapy. In a cell line model of resistance to letrozole (LetR), we found ERα/AIB1 promoter recruitment and subsequent expression of the classic ER target genes pS2 and Myc to be constitutively upregulated in the presence of both androstenedione and letrozole. In contrast, the recruitment of the ERα/AIB1 transcriptional complex to the nonclassic ER target cyclin D1 and its subsequent expression remained sensitive to steroid treatment and could be inhibited by treatment with letrozole. Molecular studies revealed that this may be due in part to direct steroid regulation of c-jun-NH(2)-kinase (JNK), signaling to Jun and Fos at the cyclin D1 promoter.

CONCLUSION

This study establishes a role for AIB1 in AI-resistant breast cancer and describes a new mechanism of ERα/AIB1 gene regulation which could contribute to the development of an aggressive tumor phenotype.

Functional roles and clinical values of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-5 in different types of cancers

Insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (IGFBPs) are critical regulators of the mitogenic activity of insulin-like growth factors (IGFs). IGFBP5, one of these IGFBPs, has special structural features, including a nuclear transport domain, heparin-binding motif, and IGF/extracellular matrix/acid-labile subunit-binding sites. Furthermore, IGFBP5 has several functional effects on carcinogenesis and even normal cell processes, such as cell growth, death, motility, and tissue remodeling. These biological effects are sometimes related with IGF (IGF-dependent effects) and sometimes not (IGF-independent effects). The functional role of IGFBP5 is most likely determined in a cell-type and tissue-type specific manner but also depends on cell context, especially in terms of the diversity of interacting proteins and the potential for nuclear localization. Clinical findings show that IGFBP5 has the potential to be a useful clinical biomarker for predicting response to therapy and clinical outcome of cancer patients. In this review, we summarize the functional diversity and clinical importance of IGFBP5 in different types of cancers.

Early operable breast cancer in elderly women treated with an aromatase inhibitor letrozole as sole therapy

BACKGROUND

Primary endocrine therapy (PET) with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) is an option in elderly patients unfit for or unwilling to undergo surgery. We studied the outcome of patients treated with letrozole as PET.

METHODS

Patients with early oestrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-positive breast cancer treated with letrozole from February 2001 to September 2009 were reviewed. Inoperable and locally advanced tumours were excluded. Reasons for offering PET, response, survival, cause of death, time to initial and best response, fracture incidence, and late failure rates were studied.

RESULTS

In all, 104 patients received PET due to frailty (n=48), comorbidity (n=30), old age (n=9), and patient preference (n=17). Median follow-up was 56 months (4-106). Eighty-five cancers responded to letrozole (stable disease (SD, n=19), reduction in size (PR, n=42), and complete response ((CR), n=24)). Median survival was 51 months (4-103), time to initial response (PR/CR) 4.5 months (2-24), and time to best response 8.5 months (3-50). Letrozole was stopped in 25 patients due to progressive disease (n=19), side effects (n=5), and patient choice (n=1). Only 12 of 49 deaths were from breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

Letrozole is a reasonable alternative in elderly women with early ER/PR-positive invasive breast cancer who are unfit or unwilling to undergo standard therapy.

Androgen receptor genotypes predict response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The androgen receptor (AR) is frequently expressed in breast cancers. The AR genotype may affect disease-free survival and response to endocrine therapy.

METHODS

In all, 634 women undergoing breast cancer surgery between 2002 and 2008 were followed until 30 June 2010. Six haplotype-tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the AR, and the resulting AR diplotypes, were examined in relation to breast cancer patient characteristics, tumour characteristics, disease-free survival, and response to endocrine treatment.

RESULTS

Five common AR diplotypes were found. Seventeen rare variants were combined into a composite group. The resulting six AR diplotype groups were clustered into two subgroups, groups A (n=128) and B (n=499), with three diplotypes in each. Patients in group B had larger total breast volume (P=0.024), higher body mass index (BMI) (P=0.050), more axillary lymph node involvement (P(trend)=0.020), and higher histological grade (P(trend)=0.031). There were 59 breast cancer events in the 569 patients with invasive cancers and no preoperative treatment. Patients in group B also had shorter disease-free survival (P=0.037) than patients in group A. Among patients in group B with oestrogen receptor α positive tumours, tamoxifen (TAM) treatment was associated with longer disease-free survival (P=0.008), while treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) was not (P=0.94). Response to endocrine treatment could not be predicted based on BMI, suggesting that the effect of AR diplotypes went beyond that of a higher BMI.

CONCLUSION

A marker for a group of patients who responded to TAM, but not to AIs, was identified. If this finding is confirmed, AR genotyping may provide useful information for selection of endocrine treatment of breast cancer patients.

Cracking the estrogen receptor's posttranslational code in breast tumors

Estrogen signaling pathways, because of their central role in regulating the growth and survival of breast tumor cells, have been identified as suitable and efficient targets for cancer therapies. Agents blocking estrogen activity are already widely used clinically, and many new molecules have entered clinical trials, but intrinsic or acquired resistance to treatment limits their efficacy. The basic molecular studies underlying estrogen signaling have defined the critical role of estrogen receptors (ER) in many aspects of breast tumorigenesis. However, important knowledge gaps remain about the role of posttranslational modifications (PTM) of ER in initiation and progression of breast carcinogenesis. Whereas major attention has been focused on the phosphorylation of ER, many other PTM (such as acetylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation, methylation, and palmitoylation) have been identified as events modifying ER expression and stability, subcellular localization, and sensitivity to hormonal response. This article will provide an overview of the current and emerging knowledge on ER PTM, with a particular focus on their deregulation in breast cancer. We also discuss their clinical relevance and the functional relationship between PTM. A thorough understanding of the complete picture of these modifications in ER carcinogenesis might not only open new avenues for identifying new markers for prognosis or prediction of response to endocrine therapy but also could promote the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Distinct expressions of microRNAs that directly target estrogen receptor α in human breast cancer

Estrogen receptor (ER) α is essential for estrogen-dependent growth, and its level of expression is a crucial determinant of response to endocrine therapy and prognosis in ERα-positive breast cancer. Breast cancer patients show a wide range of ERα expression levels and the levels of expression in individual patients change during disease progression and in response to systemic therapies. However, little is known about how the expression of ERα in human breast cancer is regulated. Recently, several microRNAs (miRNAs) that directly target ERα have been identified, and we previously demonstrated that miR-206 expression was downregulated in ERα-positive human breast cancer. In this study, expression levels of miRNAs that directly target ERα, including miR-18a, miR-18b, miR-22, miR-193b, miR-221/222 and miR-302c, were analyzed in human breast cancer samples by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis. Correlations between the expression levels of these miRNAs and clinicopathological factors, including prognosis, were analyzed. miR-18a expression was much higher in ERα-negative than in ERα-positive tumors (P < 0.0001), with the expression levels of miR-18a not differing in ERα-positive breast cancer as a function of ERα protein level. Surprisingly, the expression levels of miR-193b and miR-221 were significantly lower in ERα-negative than in ERα-positive tumors (P = 0.0015 and P = 0.0045, respectively), and the levels of these miRNAs gradually increased as ERα protein expression increased. There was no statistically significant association between miR-22 and ERα expression, and miR-302c expression was minimal in human breast cancer samples. Prognostic analysis showed that low miR-18b expression was significantly associated with improved survival in HER2-negative breast cancer, although miR-18b expression was not correlated with ERα protein expression. Our results suggest that miRNAs that directly target ERα have distinct roles in not only regulating ERα but also regulating other target genes in human breast cancer.

PRO_10--a new tissue-based prognostic multigene marker in patients with early estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Clinicopathological and molecular factors determine the prognosis of breast cancer. PRO_10 is a prognostic score based on quantitative RT-PCR of 10 proliferation-associated genes obtained from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissues. We revalidated PRO_10 in patients treated in a non-trial setting.

METHODS

The charts of 315 patients with postmenopausal estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer between 1996 and 2004 were reviewed. Forty-eight cases relapsed within 5 years of diagnosis; they were paired with controls by matching the N and T stage, histological grade, percent ER-positive cells, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, age, adjuvant chemo- and endocrine therapy. The score was tested by conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

Despite strict matching, PRO_10 remained prognostic for recurrence in the whole group (odds ratio, OR = 4.7, p = 0.005) and in subgroups of grade 2 (OR = 5.5, p = 0.009) and N0 cancers (OR = 15, p = 0.002). Five-year recurrence-free survival was 29% in patients with high and 67% in patients with low scores (p = 0.002). PRO_10 was prognostic for overall survival (5-year overall survival 71 vs. 91%).

CONCLUSION

PRO_10 is an independent prognostic marker in postmenopausal ER-positive breast cancer. It is based on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue and could be integrated easily into the routine diagnostic workflow.

Comparative evaluation of ERα and ERβ significance in breast cancer: state of the art

Over 30 years of clinical data have unequivocally established estrogen receptor (ER)-α as a critical clinical biomarker and valid therapeutic target to fight breast cancer. However, ERα remains imperfect with respect to both of these activities, mainly because the mechanisms by which estrogens mediate their activity are far more complex than originally anticipated. The cloning of a second estrogen receptor, ERβ, has led to a full re-evaluation of our original view of the action of estrogen in breast tissues. Important challenges remain with respect to the design, selection and normalization of the most appropriate methods for assaying the expression and functionality of both receptors. Solving these challenges remains a priority in order to decide upon specific endocrine therapies and save patients who are still dying from a potentially curable disease.

Altered AIB1 or AIB1Δ3 expression impacts ERα effects on mammary gland stromal and epithelial content

Amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) (also known as steroid receptor coactivator-3) is a nuclear receptor coactivator enhancing estrogen receptor (ER)α and progesterone receptor (PR)-dependent transcription in breast cancer. The splice variant AIB1Δ3 demonstrates increased ability to promote ERα and PR-dependent transcription. Both are implicated in breast cancer risk and antihormone resistance. Conditional transgenic mice tested the in vivo impact of AIB1Δ3 overexpression compared with AIB1 on histological features of increased breast cancer risk and growth response to estrogen and progesterone in the mammary gland. Combining expression of either AIB1 or AIB1Δ3 with ERα overexpression, we investigated in vivo cooperativity. AIB1 and AIB1Δ3 overexpression equivalently increased the prevalence of hyperplastic alveolar nodules but not ductal hyperplasia or collagen content. When AIB1 or AIB1Δ3 overexpression was combined with ERα, both stromal collagen content and ductal hyperplasia prevalence were significantly increased and adenocarcinomas appeared. Overexpression of AIB1Δ3, especially combined with overexpressed ERα, led to an abnormal response to estrogen and progesterone with significant increases in stromal collagen content and development of a multilayered mammary epithelium. AIB1Δ3 overexpression was associated with a significant increase in PR expression and PR downstream signaling genes. AIB1 overexpression produced less marked growth abnormalities and no significant change in PR expression. In summary, AIB1Δ3 overexpression was more potent than AIB1 overexpression in increasing stromal collagen content, inducing abnormal mammary epithelial growth, altering PR expression levels, and mediating the response to estrogen and progesterone. Combining ERα overexpression with either AIB1 or AIB1Δ3 overexpression augmented abnormal growth responses in both epithelial and stromal compartments.

Estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in Japanese women: trends in incidence, characteristics, and prognosis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of breast cancer in Japanese women has doubled in all age groups over the past two decades.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined the characteristics of the tumors treated in three time periods between 1982 and 2010. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 status were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Correlation of hormone receptor levels with clinicopathological factors and prognosis was analyzed in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer in two age groups (≤50 years versus >50 years).

RESULTS

The frequency of ER-positive breast cancer in women aged 50 years or younger increased greatly over the interval studied (1982-1991: 52.5%, 1992-2001: 72.6%, 2002-2010: 87.1%, P < 0.0001). The frequency of ER-positive tumors also significantly increased in women over 50 years of age (1982-1991: 69.4%, 1992-2001: 73.3%, 2002-2010: 78.6%, P = 0.029). In ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, tumor grade was negatively correlated with expression levels of ER and PgR. Prognosis for patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative disease significantly improved over time, due to advances in adjuvant therapies.

CONCLUSION

It is necessary to establish risk factors, both genetic and environmental, capable of predicting the risk of ER-positive breast cancer and thus enable the efficient selection of candidates for hormone receptor-targeted chemoprevention.

Traditional molecular markers and response to adjuvant endocrine or trastuzumab-based therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The accurate assessment of traditional molecular markers is essential to inform the choice of the adjuvant systemic treatments for patients with breast cancer. Extensive research efforts have been made to explore whether it is also possible to predict the actual response to the different therapeutic options based on the expression of these markers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Endocrine responsiveness of breast cancer has been eventually defined according to the expression of estrogen receptors in at least 1% of invasive tumor cells. The quantitative evaluation of estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors (PgR) and Ki-67 labeling index may help in selecting patients with estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative tumors who can be spared or may benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy. Guideline recommendations for an optimal testing of estrogen receptors and PgR have been issued to assist pathologists in the accurate assessment of these markers. Progress has also been made in the identification of candidate patients to HER2-targeted therapies and in the prediction of response to trastuzumab.

SUMMARY

Traditional molecular markers play a major role in the selection of candidate patients to systemic interventions, but they are of limited value in predicting their actual response to the different treatments, especially when the markers are evaluated individually.

Aromatase inhibitors: prediction of response and nature of resistance

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are recommended for and central to endocrine management of breast cancer patients. Response rates can be high, but resistance is a major obstacle. Optimal management therefore requires accurate prediction of response and an understanding of the nature by which resistance occurs. These are the subjects of this review.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The complications of assessing response in different clinical settings and the types of response in terms of clinical, pathological, proliferative and molecular endpoints are reviewed. The current status of predictors of response such as estrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptors, other markers of estrogen action, ER phosphorylation, ER coregulators and multigene signatures are assessed. Different types of resistance to AIs, their heterogeneity, diversity in mechanisms of resistance and their identification are also considered.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The review provides fundamental information on response and predictors of response to AIs as well as an understanding of the diversity of resistance mechanisms to such endocrine agents.

TAKE HOME MESSAGES

ER status is the only factor used routinely for treatment selection, but additional markers are needed to predict response. Other markers have some predictive powers, but are of limited utility. The hope is, therefore, that discovery strategies based on genome-wide searches will identify new markers. Assessments may be required both before and after a short period of treatment so that early changes can be used to predict subsequent clinical response. Mechanisms of resistance to AIs are diverse. Knowledge of specific resistance mechanisms in individual cases will be necessary if strategies to circumvent resistance are to be developed rationally. A future can be envisaged in which molecular phenotyping of individual tumors is used to decide not only which patients should be treated with AIs but also whether AIs should be used alone or in combination/sequence with other drug regimes.

FOXM1 is a transcriptional target of ERalpha and has a critical role in breast cancer endocrine sensitivity and resistance

In this study we investigated the regulation of FOXM1 expression by estrogen receptor α (ERα) and its role in hormonal therapy and endocrine resistance. FOXM1 protein and mRNA expression was regulated by ER-ligands, including estrogen, tamoxifen (OHT), and fulvestrant (ICI182780; ICI) in breast carcinoma cell lines. Depletion of ERα by RNA interference (RNAi) in MCF-7 cells down-regulated FOXM1 expression. Reporter gene assays demonstrated that ERα activates FOXM1 transcription through an estrogen-response element (ERE) located within the proximal promoter region. The direct binding of ERα to the FOXM1 promoter was confirmed in vitro by mobility shift and DNA pull-down assays and in vivo by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis. Our data also revealed that upon OHT treatment ERα recruits histone deacetylases (HDACs) to the ERE site of the FOXM1 promoter, which is associated with a decrease in histone acetylation and transcription activity. Importantly, silencing of FOXM1 by RNAi abolished estrogen-induced MCF-7 cell proliferation and overcame acquired tamoxifen resistance. Conversely, ectopic expression of FOXM1 abrogated the cell cycle arrest mediated by the anti-estrogen OHT. OHT repressed FOXM1 expression in endocrine sensitive but not resistant breast carcinoma cell lines. Further, qRT-PCR analysis of breast cancer patient samples revealed there was a strong and significant positive correlation between ERα and FOXM1 mRNA expression. Collectively, these results demonstrate FOXM1 to be a key mediator of the mitogenic functions of ERα and estrogen in breast cancer cells, and also suggest that the deregulation of FOXM1 may contribute to anti-estrogen insensitivity.