Phase I study of irinotecan and doxifluridine for metastatic colorectal cancer focusing on the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism

Association between a single nucleotide polymorphism in the R3HCC1 gene and irinotecan toxicity

OBJECTIVE

Irinotecan is a useful anticancer drug for colorectal cancer treatment. UGT1A1*28 and *6 gene polymorphisms are known risk factors for irinotecan-associated toxicity. However, severe adverse effects due to irinotecan have been observed even in patients who do not harbor UGT1A1*28 or *6. We investigated gene polymorphisms in the whole exome to identify useful biomarkers for irinotecan toxicity other than UGT1A.

METHODS

A total of 178 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and 87 patients with pancreatic cancer were treated with FOLFIRI, FOLFOX, FOLFOXIRI, modified FOLFIRINOX, or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. Genome-wide screening was performed using whole-exome sequencing (WES), and validation analysis was performed using qPCR with a hydrolysis probe.

RESULTS

Using WES after a doublet chemotherapy regimen comprising irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil (n = 15), seven single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified as candidate biomarkers for irinotecan-associated toxicity of neutropenia. Among the seven SNPs, an SNP in R3H domain and coiled-coil containing 1 (R3HCC1; c.919G > A, rs2272761) showed a significant association with neutropenia (>grade 3) after doublet chemotherapy. Patients receiving irinotecan including triplet chemotherapy, FOLFOXIRI for mCRC (n = 23) or modified FOLFIRINOX for pancreatic cancer (n = 40), also showed significant linear trends between R3HCC1 polymorphism and neutropenia (p = 0.017 and 0.046, respectively). No significant association was observed in patients treated with irinotecan-free regimens, FOLFOX for mCRC (n = 66), and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for pancreatic cancer (n = 47).

CONCLUSION

Thus, an SNP in the R3HCC1 gene may be a useful biomarker for the toxicity of irinotecan-containing chemotherapy for mCRC and pancreatic cancer.

Development of a clinical microarray system for genetic analysis screening

Objectives

Research on the relationship between diseases and genes and the advancement of genetic analysis technologies have made genetic testing in medical care possible. There are various methods for genetic testing, including PCR-based methods and next-generation sequencing; however, screening tests in clinical laboratories are becoming more diverse; therefore, novel measurement systems and equipment are required to meet the needs of each situation. In this study, we aimed to develop a novel microarray-based genetic analysis system that uses a Peltier element to overcome the issues of conventional microarrays, such as the long measurement time and high cost.

Methods

We constructed a microarray system to detect the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase gene polymorphisms UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28 in patients eligible for irinotecan hydrochloride treatment for use in clinical laboratories. To evaluate the performance of the system, the hybridization temperature and reaction time were determined, and the results were compared with those obtained using a conventional hybridization oven.

Results

The hybridization temperature reached its target in 1/27th of the time required by the conventional system. We assessed 111 human clinical samples and found that our results agreed with those obtained using existing methods. The total time for the newly developed device was reduced by 85 min compared to that for existing methods, as the automated DNA microarray eliminates the time that existing methods spend on manual operation.

Conclusions

The surface treatment technology used in our system enables high-density and strong DNA fixation, allowing the construction of a measurement system suitable for clinical applications.

Pharmacogenomics Testing in Phase I Oncology Clinical Trials: Constructive Criticism Is Warranted

Simple Summary

Phase I clinical trials are a cornerstone of pharmaceutical development in oncology. Many studies have now attempted to incorporate pharmacogenomics into phase I studies; however, many of these studies have fundamental flaws that that preclude interpretation and application of their findings. Study populations are often small and heterogeneous with multiple disease states, multiple dose levels, and prior therapies. Genetic testing typically includes few variants in candidate genes that do no encapsulate the full range of phenotypic variability in protein function. Moreover, a plurality of these studies do not present scientifically robust clinical or preclinical justification for undertaking pharmacogenomics studies. A significant amount of progress in understanding pharmacogenomic variability has occurred since pharmacogenomics approaches first began appearing in the literature. This progress can be immediately leveraged for the vast majority of Phase I studies. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current literature pertaining to Phase I incorporation of pharmacogenomics studies, analyze potential flaws in study design, and suggest approaches that can improve design of future scientific efforts.

Abstract

While over ten-thousand phase I studies are published in oncology, fewer than 1% of these studies stratify patients based on genetic variants that influence pharmacology. Pharmacogenetics-based patient stratification can improve the success of clinical trials by identifying responsive patients who have less potential to develop toxicity; however, the scientific limits imposed by phase I study designs reduce the potential for these studies to make conclusions. We compiled all phase I studies in oncology with pharmacogenetics endpoints (n = 84), evaluating toxicity (n = 42), response or PFS (n = 32), and pharmacokinetics (n = 40). Most of these studies focus on a limited number of agent classes: Topoisomerase inhibitors, antimetabolites, and anti-angiogenesis agents. Eight genotype-directed phase I studies were identified. Phase I studies consist of homogeneous populations with a variety of comorbidities, prior therapies, racial backgrounds, and other factors that confound statistical analysis of pharmacogenetics. Taken together, phase I studies analyzed herein treated small numbers of patients (median, 95% CI = 28, 24–31), evaluated few variants that are known to change phenotype, and provided little justification of pharmacogenetics hypotheses. Future studies should account for these factors during study design to optimize the success of phase I studies and to answer important scientific questions.

Human variability in isoform-specific UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: markers of acute and chronic exposure, polymorphisms and uncertainty factors

UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) are involved in phase II conjugation reactions of xenobiotics and differences in their isoform activities result in interindividual kinetic differences of UGT probe substrates. Here, extensive literature searches were performed to identify probe substrates (14) for various UGT isoforms (UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, UGT2B7 and UGT2B15) and frequencies of human polymorphisms. Chemical-specific pharmacokinetic data were collected in a database to quantify interindividual differences in markers of acute (Cmax) and chronic (area under the curve, clearance) exposure. Using this database, UGT-related uncertainty factors were derived and compared to the default factor (i.e. 3.16) allowing for interindividual differences in kinetics. Overall, results show that pharmacokinetic data are predominantly available for Caucasian populations and scarce for other populations of different geographical ancestry. Furthermore, the relationships between UGT polymorphisms and pharmacokinetic parameters are rarely addressed in the included studies. The data show that UGT-related uncertainty factors were mostly below the default toxicokinetic uncertainty factor of 3.16, with the exception of five probe substrates (1-OH-midazolam, ezetimibe, raltegravir, SN38 and trifluoperazine), with three of these substrates being metabolised by the polymorphic isoform 1A1. Data gaps and future work to integrate UGT-related variability distributions with in vitro data to develop quantitative in vitro–in vivo extrapolations in chemical risk assessment are discussed.

Extensive literature search of human kinetic parameters for UGT probe substrates.

Bayesian meta-analysis quantifying human variability in acute and chronic kinetic parameters.

UGT isoform-related uncertainty factors were below the 3.16 kinetic default uncertainty factor for most probe substrates.

Quantifying human variability in UGT polymorphisms.

Rapid and sensitive detection of UGT1A1 polymorphisms associated with irinotecan toxicity by a novel DNA microarray

Recent developments in the field of human genomics have greatly enhanced the potential for precision and personalized medicine. We have developed a novel DNA microarray, using a 3‐mm square chip coated with diamond‐like carbon to enhance the signal‐to‐background ratio, for use as an in vitro diagnostic tool in precision medicine. To verify the genotyping effectiveness of this newly developed DNA microarray we examined UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) polymorphisms in DNA extracted from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is established that the polymorphisms of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 are significantly associated with severe toxicity induced by the anti‐cancer drug irinotecan. For each sample, the results obtained with the novel microarray platform were compared with those obtained using other, more established, methods, including direct sequencing and the Invader assay. The polymorphisms tested included a single nucleotide substitution (UGT1A1*6) and a TA‐repeat polymorphism (UGT1A1*28), both of which were detected simultaneously and accurately using our method. Moreover, our method required 1.5‐fold less time to assay and 20‐fold less sample than those required by the Invader assay. In summary, our newly developed DNA microarray is more practical than established methods, and is at least as accurate; this will increase the efficiency of polymorphism detection prior to diagnosis and the commencement of treatment, and can feasibly be applied in precision medicine.

UGT1A1 polymorphisms in cancer: impact on irinotecan treatment

Mutations in the UGT1A1 gene have been implicated in Gilbert syndrome, which shows mild hyperbilirubinemia, and a more aggressive childhood subtype, Crigler–Najjar syndrome. To date, more than 100 variants have been found in the UGT1A1 gene. Among them, UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 have been reported to be associated with severe toxicities in patients treated with irinotecan-based chemotherapy by increasing the dose of SN-38 (7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin), an active form of irinotecan. Many association studies and meta-analyses have demonstrated the contribution of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 polymorphisms to the toxicities caused by irinotecan-based therapy. The aim of this review was to evaluate the impact of these variants upon the toxicities and the efficacy of irinotecan-based chemotherapy.

UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1*6 and *28 polymorphisms as indicators of initial dose level of irinotecan to reduce risk of neutropenia in patients receiving FOLFIRI for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan (CPT-11)-induced neutropenia is associated with UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1*6 and *28 polymorphisms. This prospective study investigated whether using these polymorphisms to adjust the initial dose of CPT-11 as part of FOLFIRI treatment in colorectal cancer patients might improve safety.

METHODS

All data were collected by a physician. The relationship between UGT1A1 polymorphisms and first-cycle neutropenia, reasons for treatment discontinuation, and time-to-treatment failure were evaluated. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the risk of neutropenia.

RESULTS

A total of 795 patients were divided into wild-type (*1/*1) (50.1 %), heterozygous (*28/*1, *6/*1) (41.1 %), and homozygous (*28/*28, *6/*6, *28/*6) (8.8 %) groups, in which the median starting dose of CPT-11 was 143.0, 143.0, and 115.0 mg/m(2), respectively. First-cycle grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 17.3, 25.4, and 28.6 % of these patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia was significantly greater in the heterozygous and homozygous groups than in the wild-type group [odds ratio (OR) 1.67; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.16-2.42; p = 0.0060, and OR 2.22; 95 % CI 1.22-4.02; p = 0.0088, respectively]. Age (OR 1.77; 95 % CI 1.24-2.53; p = 0.0017), coelomic fluid (OR 1.84; 95 % CI 1.05-3.25; p = 0.0343), and non-reduction in starting dose (OR 1.53; 95 % CI 1.08-2.18; p = 0.0176) were also identified as significant risk factors.

CONCLUSION

The risk of neutropenia was higher in the heterozygous and homozygous groups at initiation of CPT-11 treatment. This suggests that when a reduction in dose is required in patients harboring two variant alleles, the decrease should be approximately 20 %.

Differences in UGT1A1, UGT1A7, and UGT1A9 polymorphisms between Uzbek and Japanese populations

Background and Objectives

Uridine-diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A (UGT1A) is a key enzyme involved in irinotecan metabolism, and polymorphisms in the UGT1A gene are associated with irinotecan-induced toxicity. The aim of this study was to elucidate the allele frequencies of UGT1A polymorphisms in healthy Uzbek volunteers, and to compare them with those of the Japanese population.

Method

A total of 97 healthy volunteers from Uzbekistan were enrolled and blood samples were collected from each participant. Genotyping analysis was performed by fragment size analysis for UGT1A1*28, direct sequencing for UGT1A7*3 and UGT1A9*22, and TaqMan assays for UGT1A1*93, UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*27, UGT1A1*60, and UGT1A7*12. The frequencies of polymorphisms were compared with the Japanese population by using the data previously reported from our study group.

Results

When the Uzbek and Japanese populations were compared, heterozygotes or homozygotes for UGT1A1*28, UGT1A1*60, and UGT1A1*93 were significantly more frequent in the Uzbek population (P < 0.01). The rate of UGT1A7*12 was not significantly different between the two populations, whereas UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A9*22 were significantly less frequent in the Uzbek population (P < 0.05). UGT1A7*1 were less prevalent in the Uzbek population than in the Japanese population (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

The Uzbek population has different frequencies of polymorphisms in UGT1A genes compared with the Japanese population. A comprehensive study of the influence of UGT1A1 polymorphisms on the risk of irinotecan-induced toxicity is necessary for optimal use of irinotecan treatment.

Pharmacogenetics of cancer drugs

The variability in treatment outcomes among patients receiving the same therapy for seemingly similar tumors can be attributed in part to genetics. The tumor's (somatic) genome largely dictates the effectiveness of the therapy, and the patient's (germline) genome influences drug exposure and the patient's sensitivity to toxicity. Many potentially clinically useful associations have been discovered between common germline genetic polymorphisms and outcomes of cancer treatment. This review highlights the germline pharmacogenetic associations that are currently being used to guide cancer treatment decisions, those that are most likely to someday be clinically useful, and associations that are well known but their roles in clinical management are not yet certain. In the future, germline genetic information will likely be available from tumor genetic analyses, creating an efficient opportunity to integrate the two genomes to optimize treatment outcomes for each individual cancer patient.

A novel system for predicting the toxicity of irinotecan based on statistical pattern recognition with UGT1A genotypes

To predict precisely severe toxicity of irinotecan, we evaluated the association of UGT1A variants, haplotypes and the combination of UGT1A genotypes to severe toxicity of irinotecan. UGT1A1*6 (211G>A), UGT1A1*28 (TA₆>TA₇), UGT1A1*60 (−3279T>G), UGT1A7 (387T>G), UGT1A7 (622T>C), and UGT1A9*1b (−118T₉>T_10, also named *22) were genotyped in 123 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had received irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Among the 123 patients, 73 were enrolled in either of two phase II studies of the FOLFIRI (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan) regimen; these patients constituted the training population, which was used to construct the predicting system. The other 50 patients constituted the validation population; these 50 patients either had participated in a phase II study of irinotecan/5′-deoxy-5-fluorouridine or were among consecutive patients who received FOLFIRI therapy. This prediction system used sequential forward floating selection based on statistical pattern recognition using UGT1A genotypes, gender and age. Several UGT1A genotypes [UGT1A1*6, UGT1A7 (387T>G), UGT1A7 (622T>C) and UGT1A9*1b] were associated with the irinotecan toxicity. Among the haplotypes, haplotype-I (UGT1A1: −3279T, TA₆, 211G; UGT1A7: 387T, 622T; UGT1A9: T₁₀) and haplotype-II (UGT1A1: −3279T, TA₆, 211A; UGT1A7: 387G, 622C; UGT1A9: T₉) were also associated with irinotecan toxicity. Furthermore, our new system for predicting the risk of irinotecan toxicity was 83.9% accurate with the training population and 72.1% accurate with the validation population. Our novel prediction system using statistical pattern recognition depend on genotypes in UGT1A, age and gender; moreover, it showed high predictive performance even though the treatment regimens differed among the training and validation patients.

Evaluation of the effect of UGT1A1 polymorphisms on dolutegravir pharmacokinetics

AIM

To evaluate potential pharmacogenetic effects of UGT1A1 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of dolutegravir (Tivicay®; ViiV Healthcare, NC, USA), an HIV-1 integrase inhibitor.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Analysis of pooled data from nine Phase I and II clinical studies was undertaken for 89 subjects receiving repeat dolutegravir 50 mg once daily (tablet formulation) who were genotyped for known UGT1A1 functional variants.

RESULTS

Geometric mean ratio (92% CI) for subjects carrying low (*28/*28 and *28/*37) and reduced activity (*1/*6, *1/*28, *1/*37, *28/*36 and *36/*37) polymorphisms compared with subjects with normal activity (*1/*1 and *1/*36) showed decreased oral clearance (CL/F; 0.765 [92% CI: 0.659-0.889]), increased area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-τ); 1.307 [1.125-1.518]) and C(max) (1.221 [1.063-1.402]), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Increased dolutegravir exposure in carriers of UGT1A1 reduced function polymorphisms is not clinically significant based on accumulated safety data so dose adjustment in these individuals is not required.

The association of UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28 with irinotecan-induced neutropenia in Asians: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The UGT1A1*28 polymorphism is known as a biomarker of irinotecan-induced neutropenia in Caucasians. However, in Asians, the UGT1A1*28 mutation is much less frequent.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed to assess the association of the UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28 with neutropenia in Asians.

RESULTS

In a combination test of the two variations, patients with severe neutropenia displayed a 155% higher mutational load than those that were not neutropenic (ORG = 2.55; 95% CI: 1.82-3.58).

CONCLUSIONS

In Asians, a combination test of UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28 might be a potential biomarker of irinotecan-induced neutropenia, an observation that will need additional trials for confirmation.

UGT1A1*6, 1A7*3, and 1A9*22 genotypes predict severe neutropenia in FOLFIRI-treated metastatic colorectal cancer in two prospective studies in Japan

Retrospective studies have suggested that UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A1, UGT1A7, and UGT1A9 predict severe toxicity and efficacy of irinotecan-containing regimens. We prospectively evaluated the impact of UGT1A genotypes and haplotypes on severe toxicity and efficacy in patients treated with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan combination chemotherapy (FOLFIRI) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) from the two prospective multicenter phase II studies in Japan. The FLIGHT1 study was a first-line FOLFIRI trial, and FLIGHT2 was a FOLFOX-refractory, second-line FOLFIRI trial. A total of 73 patients agreed to additional analysis, and were genotyped for UGT1A polymorphisms, UGT1A1*28 (TA6>TA7), UGT1A1*6 (211G>A), UGT1A1*27 (686C>A), UGT1A1*60 (-3279T>G), UGT1A1*93 (-3156G>A), UGT1A7 (-57T>G), UGT1A7*3 (387T>G, 622T>C), and UGT1A9*22 (T9>T10). Of 73 patients, 34 developed G3/4 severe hematological toxicities. The toxicities were significantly more frequent in patients with UGT1A1*6 (211A), UGT1A7 (387G), and UGT1A9*22 reference alleles (T9). Haplotype I, which consists of all favorable alleles, was associated with a significant reduction in hematologic toxicity (P = 0.031). In contrast, haplotype II, which contains four high-risk alleles, showed significantly higher hematologic toxicity than the other haplotypes (P = 0.010). Six out of seven patients who were homozygous for UGT1A1*28 or *6 experienced severe hematological toxicity despite the fact that their response rate was not impaired (42.9%). We concluded that UGT1A polymorphisms, especially UGT1A1*6, are important for the prediction of severe toxicity of FOLFIRI in northeast Asian populations. In this regard, haplotype analyses should substantially impact the prediction of severe hematological toxicities of FOLFIRI. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000002388 and UMIN000002476).

Relevance of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase polymorphisms for drug dosing: A quantitative systematic review

UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) catalyze the biotransformation of many endobiotics and xenobiotics, and are coded by polymorphic genes. However, knowledge about the effects of these polymorphisms is rarely used for the individualization of drug therapy. Here, we present a quantitative systematic review of clinical studies on the impact of UGT variants on drug metabolism to clarify the potential for genotype-adjusted therapy recommendations. Data on UGT polymorphisms and dose-related pharmacokinetic parameters in man were retrieved by a systematic search in public databases. Mean estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters were extracted for each group of carriers of UGT variants to assess their effect size. Pooled estimates and relative confidence bounds were computed with a random-effects meta-analytic approach whenever multiple studies on the same variant, ethnic group, and substrate were available. Information was retrieved on 30 polymorphic metabolic pathways involving 10 UGT enzymes. For irinotecan and mycophenolic acid a wealth of data was available for assessing the impact of genetic polymorphisms on pharmacokinetics under different dosages, between ethnicities, under comedication, and under toxicity. Evidence for effects of potential clinical relevance exists for 19 drugs, but the data are not sufficient to assess effect size with the precision required to issue dose recommendations. In conclusion, compared to other drug metabolizing enzymes much less systematic research has been conducted on the polymorphisms of UGT enzymes. However, there is evidence of the existence of large monogenetic functional polymorphisms affecting pharmacokinetics and suggesting a potential use of UGT polymorphisms for the individualization of drug therapy.

Use of pharmacogenetics for predicting cancer prognosis and treatment exposure, response and toxicity

Cancer treatment is complicated because of a multitude of treatment options and little patient-specific information to help clinicians choose appropriate therapy. There are two genomes relevant in cancer treatment: the tumor (somatic) and the patient (germline). Together, these two genomes dictate treatment outcome through four processes: the somatic genome primarily determines tumor prognosis and response while the germline genome modulates treatment exposure and toxicity. In this review, we describe the influence of these genomes on treatment outcomes by highlighting examples of genetic variation that are predictors of each of these four factors, prognosis, response, toxicity and exposure, and discuss the translation and clinical implementation of each. Use of pre-treatment pharmacogenetic testing will someday enable clinicians to make individualized therapy decisions about aggressiveness, drug selection and dose, improving treatment outcomes for cancer patients.

Association of UGT1A1*28 polymorphisms with irinotecan-induced toxicities in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis in Caucasians

A meta-analysis in Caucasians was conducted to investigate the possible association of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 gene polymorphisms with irinotecan (IRI)-induced neutropenia and diarrhoea in colorectal cancer (CRC). We searched PubMed and Embase until May 2012 to identify eligible studies, extracted data, assessed methodological quality, and performed statistical analysis using REVMAN 5.1 and R software. Subgroups meta-analyses were performed in groups representing different IRI combination regimens and IRI doses. Sixteen trials were included. UGT1A1*28/*28 genotype was associated with more than fourfold (odds ratio (OR)=4.79, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 3.28-7.01; P<0.00001) and threefold (OR=3.44, 95% CI: 2.45-4.82; P<0.00001) increases in the risk of neutropenia when compared with wild type and with at least one UGT1A1*1 allele, respectively. UGT1A1*1/*28 genotype had an OR of 1.90 (95% CI: 1.44-2.51; P<0.00001) for an increased risk of neutropenia. A twofold increase in risk of diarrhoea was associated with UGT1A1*28/*28 genotype (OR=1.84, 95% CI: 1.24-2.72; P=0.002). In subgroup meta-analysis, the higher incidence of diarrhoea in UGT1A1*28/*28 patients was limited to studies where when IRI was given at higher doses (OR=2.37, 95% CI: 1.39-4.04; P=0.002) or combined with 5-fluorouracil (FU or analogue) (OR=1.78, 95% CI: 1.16-2.75; P=0.009). Genotyping of UGT1A1*28 polymorphism before treatment for CRC can tailor IRI therapy and reduce the IRI-related toxicities. IRI-combined 5-FU (or analogue) and a high-dose IRI therapy enhance IRI-induced diarrhoea among patients bearing the UGT1A1*28 allele. Although the toxicity relationships were much stronger with the UGT1A1*28 homozygous variant, associations were also found with the UGT1A1*28 heterozygous variant.

Association between UGT1A1*28 polymorphisms and clinical outcomes of irinotecan-based chemotherapies in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis in Caucasians

BACKGROUND

Whether UGT1A1*28 genotype is associated with clinical outcomes of irinotecan (IRI)-based chemotherapy in Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an important gap in existing knowledge to inform clinical utility. Published data on the association between UGT1A1*28 gene polymorphisms and clinical outcomes of IRI-based chemotherapy in CRC were inconsistent.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Literature retrieval, trials selection and assessment, data collection, and statistical analysis were performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Primary outcomes included therapeutic response (TR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We calculated odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Twelve clinical trials were included. No statistical heterogeneity was detected in analyses of all studies and for each subgroup. Differences in TR, PFS and OS for any genotype comparison, UGT1A1*28/*28 versus (vs) UGT1A1*1/*1 (homozygous model), UGT1A1*1/*28 vs UGT1A1*1/*1 (heterozygous model), and UGT1A1*28/*28 vs all others (recessive model, only for TR) were not statistically significant. IRI dose also did not impact upon TR and PFS differences between UGT1A1 genotype groups. A statistically significant increase in the hazard of death was found in Low IRI subgroup of the homozygous model (HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.06-2.07; P = 0.02). The UGT1A1*28 allele was associated with a trend of increase in the hazard of death in two models (homozygous model: HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.99-1.51; heterozygous model: HR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.96-1.32). These latter findings were driven primarily by one single large study (Shulman et al. 2011).

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

UGT1A1*28 polymorphism cannot be considered as a reliable predictor of TR and PFS in CRC patients treated with IRI-based chemotherapy. The OS relationship with UGT1A1*28 in the patients with lower-dose IRI chemotherapy requires further validation.

Is there diversity among UGT1A1 polymorphism in Japan

AIM: To investigate into the diversity of UGT1A1 polymorphism across three different districts in Japan and highlight genetic differences among the population in Japan.

METHODS: We enrolled 50 healthy volunteers from each of the Yamaguchi (western part of Japan), Kochi (southern part of Japan) and Akita (northern part of Japan) prefectures. Blood samples (7 mL) were collected from each participant and stored in EDTA for subsequent genotyping by fragment size analysis, direct sequencing and TaqMan assay of UGT1A1*28, UGT1A7*3/UGT1A9*22 and UGT1A1*93/UGT1A1*6/UGT1A1*27/UGT1A1*60/UGT1A7 (-57), respectively.

RESULTS: The only statistically significant differences in allele polymorphisms among the group examined were for UGT1A1*6. The Akita population showed more UGT1A1*6 heterozygosity (P = 0.0496).

CONCLUSION: Our study revealed no regional diversity among UGT1A1, UGT1A7 or UGT1A9 polymorphisms in Japan.

A genotype-directed phase I-IV dose-finding study of irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil/leucovorin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer

Background:

Infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin (FU/LV) plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) is one of the standard first-line options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Irinotecan is converted into 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) by a carboxylsterase and metabolised through uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase (UGT1A1). The UGT1A1^*28 allele has been associated with the risk of developing severe toxicities. The present trial was designed to define the maximum tolerated dose according to UGT1A1 genotype. This report focuses on the results of tolerance to different escalated doses of FOLFIRI first-line of chemotherapy.

Patients and methods:

Patients undergoing first-line treatment for mCRC and eligible for treatment with FOLFIRI were classified according to UGT1A1 genotype. A total of 94 patients were eligible for dose escalation of irinotecan. The starting dose of biweekly irinotecan was 180 mg m⁻² for the ^*1/^*1, 110 mg m⁻² for the ^*1/^*28 and 90 mg m⁻² for the ^*28/^*28 genotypes.

Results:

The dose of irinotecan was escalated to 450 mg m⁻² in patients with the ^*1/^*1 genotype, to 390 mg m⁻² in those with the ^*1/^*28 genotype and to 150 mg m⁻² in those with the ^*28/^*28 genotype. Neutropenia and diarrhoea were the most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities.

Conclusions:

Our results demonstrated that the recommended dose of 180 mg m⁻² for irinotecan in FOLFIRI is considerably lower than the dose that can be tolerated for patients with the UGT1A1 ^*1/^*1 and ^*1/^*28 genotypes. The maximum tolerable dose (MTD) in patients with a high-risk UGT1A1 ^*28/^*28 genotype is 30% lower than the standard dose of 180 mg m⁻².

Improving oncology outcomes through targeted therapeutics will require electronic delivery systems

Typically, chemotherapy selection takes into account patient demographic data, including disease symptoms, family history, environmental factors and concurrent medications. Although validated and approved genomics tests are available for targeted therapeutics, a major challenge facing healthcare is the ability to process the genomic data in the patient’s context and to return clinically interpretable dosing guidance to the physician in a realistic time frame. Delivery of these targeted therapeutics, made possible by clinical decision support systems connected to an electronic health record may help drive both the acceptance and adaptation of an electronic health record system, as well as provide personalized information at point-of-care, as part of the routine workflow. The realization of targeted therapeutics will depend on the concerted efforts of stakeholder groups as they address political, ethical, socioeconomical and technical challenges to achieve personalized medicine adoption through real-world implementation.

Prospective phase II study of FOLFIRI for mCRC in Japan, including the analysis of UGT1A1 28/6 polymorphisms

OBJECTIVES

This is the first phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the first-line FOLFIRI, as well as the influence of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase 1, family polypeptide A1 gene (UGT1A1) 28/6 polymorphism, in Japanese metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients were enrolled in this study and were administrated FOLFIRI (irinotecan; 150 mg/m(2)) as first-line chemotherapy. Thirty-nine patients accepted the evaluation of UGT1A1 genotypes. In patients with UGT1A1 28 homozygosity, the starting dose was reduced (100 mg/m(2)) according to the Food and Drug Administration recommendation and our previous phase I study.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up period of 22 months, complete response was achieved in 1.9%, partial response in 38.5 %, stable disease in 51.9% and progressive disease in 3.9%. The overall response rate was 40.4%, the disease control rate was 92.3% and the median overall survival time was 22.3 months. The major toxicity was grade 3-4 neutropenia in 44.2%. There was no definite relation between UGT1A1 28, 6 polymorphisms and toxicity. However, homozygosity for UGT1A1 28 or UGT1A1 6 and double heterozygosity for both UGT1A1 28 and UGT1A1 6 were significantly associated with severe neutropenia in metastatic colorectal cancer patients (P< 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

FOLFIRI is effective and tolerable for Japanese metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Homozygosity for UGT1A1 28 or 6 and heterozygosity for both UGT1A1 28 and 6 are associated with severe neutropenia.

Irinotecan pharmacogenomics

Irinotecan is a camptothecin analog used as an anticancer drug. Severe, potentially life-threatening toxicities can occur from irinotecan treatment. Although multiple genes may play a role in irinotecan activity, the majority of evidence to date suggests that variation in expression of UGT1A1 caused by a common promoter polymorphism (UGT1A1*28) is strongly associated with toxicity; however, this link is dose dependent. Variations in other pharmacokinetic genes, particularly the transporter ABCC2, also contribute to irinotecan toxicity. In addition, recent studies have shown that pharmacodynamic genes such as TDP1 and XRCC1 can also play a role in both toxicity and response.

The importance of evaluation of DNA amplificability in KRAS mutation testing with dideoxy sequencing using formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded colorectal cancer tissues

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated DNA amplificability to achieve a 100% success rate in KRAS mutation testing with dideoxy sequencing using formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded colorectal cancer tissue samples obtained from a recent clinical trial.

METHODS

We evaluated the effects of deparaffinization, formalin fixation or storage time, and amplicon size on the amplificability of DNAs extracted from 19 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded colorectal cancer tissue samples. We subjected to KRAS mutation analysis 112 samples from metastatic colorectal cancer patients in 31 hospitals enrolled in a Phase II trial of a second-line FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil+ leucovorin + irinotecan) + cetuximab regimen.

RESULTS

Deparaffinization, formalin fixation and storage times did not appear to affect the recovery and amplificability of DNAs. However, amplicon size had a remarkable effect on the amplificability of DNAs. The smaller fragments with a size of ≤278 bp (96-278 bp) were successfully amplified with polymerase chain reaction in all samples tested, whereas the larger fragments with a size of ≥298 bp (298-565 bp) were not amplified. All samples from our clinical trial were successfully analyzed using three sets of primers with the amplicon sizes of 201, 221 and 240 bp, and KRAS mutations in exons 2 and 3 were detected in 49 of the 112 cases (43.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that the evaluation of DNA amplificability and amplicon size is important for the success of mutation detection tests such as the KRAS test with dideoxy sequencing using formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue samples in the clinical setting.