Review article: a role for gastrointestinal prokinetic agents in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis?

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Barrett Esophagus in the Elderly

As our population continues to age, the early diagnosis and optimal management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease becomes paramount. Maintaining a low threshold for evaluating atypical symptoms in this population is key to improving outcomes. Should patients develop complications including severe esophagitis, peptic stricture, or Barrett esophagus, then a discussion of medical, endoscopic, and surgical treatments that accounts for patient's comorbidities and survival is important. Advances in screening, surveillance, and endoscopic treatment of Barrett esophagus have allowed us to dispel concerns of futility and treat a larger subset of the at-risk population.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and the elderly

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common disorder in all patients but a particular problem in the elderly, for whom the disease often presents with advanced mucosal damage and other complications. Symptoms are also not as reliable an indication of disease severity in older patients. Likewise, therapy is more difficult because of potential side effects and drug interactions.

Effects of ABT-229, a motilin agonist, on acid reflux, oesophageal motility and gastric emptying in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

AIM

The effect of ABT-229, a new macrolide with no antibacterial activity, on gastro-oesophageal reflux, oesophageal motility and gastric emptying in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease was investigated.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients were treated with a placebo and ABT-229 (2.5, 5 or 10 mg b.d.) in a randomized, incomplete crossover study design. Ambulatory 24-h pH manometry was performed and gastric emptying was assessed by the 13C-octanoic acid breath test on the seventh day of treatment.

RESULTS

A significant decrease was found in the mean (+/- s.e.) percentage of reflux time (intra-oesophageal pH < 4) for ABT-229 5 mg b.d. and 10 mg b.d., but not for 2.5 mg b.d., compared with placebo. For ABT-229 5 mg, it was 8.5 +/- 0.5% vs. 10.7 +/- 0.7% (P < 0.038) and, for ABT-229 10 mg, it was 6.6 +/- 0.5% vs. 8.4 +/- 0.5% (P < 0.019). There were no significant differences in any of the analysed manometric parameters. In addition, the gastric half-emptying time for all doses of ABT-229 did not differ significantly from that after placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

ABT-229 is able to reduce slightly, but significantly, acid reflux in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. This effect does not appear to be due to a measurable improvement in oesophageal motility or gastric emptying.

Review article: treatment of mild and severe cases of GERD

GERD prevalence continues to rise in contrast to peptic ulcer disease. The spectrum contains reflux esophagitis and so-called 'endoscopy-negative GERD' or 'non-erosive GERD' (NERD) or S-GERD and patients with 'normal' overall 24-h esophageal acidification but with a high 'symptom-index'. The majority of reflux patients will not need endoscopy initially. Prompt referral for endoscopy is indicated only if the patient has atypical symptoms or alarm symptoms such as dysphagia, anemia, weight loss, severe abdominal pain, or pain that does not respond to acid neutralization or suppression, or develops symptoms after the age of 50 years. Antireflux therapy consist of raising the head of the bed, maintaining normal weight, and avoidance of foods and drugs that precipitate symptoms, together with antacids or over-the-counter H(2) receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs). If symptoms persist after these simple measures or if antacids or H(2)RAs are needed quite often, then a more formal first-line treatment should be started. Many experts feel that a stepdown approach instead of a stepup approach is clinically and economically a more appropriate way of installing such first-line therapy. Physicians increasingly consider prescribing a (low- or standard dose) once-a-day proton pump inhibitor (PPI) as firstline therapy. If symptoms recur after 4-week trial or are in sufficiently relieved, then the patient should be referred for endoscopy. Endoscopy may reveal no abnormalities (NERD) or evidence of reflux-induced damage. Treatment of endoscopy-negative reflux disease should be directed towards rapid relief of symptoms and then maintenance of relief using minimum effective therapy. Responses to PPIs are somewhat lower in endoscopy-negative patients compared to esophagitis. Some form of long-term therapy is needed in the majority of patients. 'On demand' PPI therapy to control reflux symptoms is a new and attractive option. The goal of treatment of GERD should be to relieve symptoms and to heal lesions. Symptom severity and much less endoscopic abnormalities, drives the therapy. When symptoms are mild or intermittent and when esophagitis is absent or minimal, standard dose PPI is usually reinstituted. If there is moderate or severe esophagitis or if symptoms are particularly troublesome, then the patient should start again with standard-dose PPI therapy once a day, but not uncommonly a b.i.d. dosage maybe necessary. Once a dose of the acid suppressant that relieves symptoms is found, this dose should be maintained for a period of 3 months. After this time, an attempt should be made to reduce the dose. A plan should be formulated for long-term treatment.

Gastro-Oesophageal reflux in the elderly: role of drug therapy in management

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is common in the elderly. The presenting symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation, so common in the young, are less frequent in the elderly. Common symptoms of GORD in the elderly are dysphagia, vomiting and respiratory problems. Because of the higher risk of associated pathological oesophageal lesions in the older person presenting with symptoms suggestive of GORD, oesophagogastroduodenoscopy must be performed earlier in their clinical course. There is only a poor correlation between the severity of the symptoms and the severity of the associated oesophagitis. Whereas lifestyle modifications are important in individuals with GORD, the use of proton pump inhibitors is recommended to heal the underlying pathology, to resolve the patient's symptoms, to prevent complications, and to improve the quality of life.

Efficacy of cisapride and domperidone in functional (nonulcer) dyspepsia: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of prokinetic agents in functional (nonulcer) dyspepsia has been questioned based on recent trial results. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of cisapride and domperidone in functional dyspepsia.

METHODS

Computer and manual searching was used to identify placebo-controlled studies that included >20 patients. The statistical analysis focused on: global assessment by the investigator, epigastric pain, early satiety, abdominal distension and nausea (all rated on four-point scales). Results are reported as odds ratios (OR) in favor of treatment. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate possible effect modifiers. The relationship between improvement in gastric emptying and symptoms was also evaluated.

RESULTS

For cisapride, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria, but varying numbers of studies had to be used for the different outcome measures. For all outcome measures, there was a statiscally significant benefit in favor of cisapride: global assessment of improvement by the investigator or patient (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.5-5.8), epigastric pain (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.7), early satiety (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.9-0.4), abdominal distension (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.1-0.7), and nausea (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.1-0.5). Age of patient, year of publication, and country where study was performed had only small modifying effects. There were insufficient data to determine whether there is a relationship between improvement in gastric emptying and response to treatment. For domperidone, four of eight studies could be used for the analysis of global assessment of improvement by the investigator. This showed an OR of 7.0 (95% CI 3.6-16) in favor of domperidone.

CONCLUSIONS

Both cisapride and domperidone seem to be efficacious in functional dyspepsia, although this conclusion is largely based on global assessment by the investigator, which may not be an optimal outcome measure.

Gastric myoelectric activity in older adults treated with cisapride for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The incidence of both gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and upper gastrointestinal motility disorders appears to increase with age. However, there is a dearth of data concerning the utility of a prokinetic agent such as cisapride in the treatment of older adults with symptomatic GERD.

AIM

To investigate the incidence of electrogastrographic abnormalities in older adults with and without GERD symptoms, as well as the effect of cisapride therapy on symptoms of GERD and electrogastrographic responses.

METHODS

We report on 18 older adults with symptomatic GERD and 10 older adult controls (mean ages 71 and 75 years, respectively). Subjects underwent electrogastrographic evaluation pre- and postprandially under baseline conditions and after 1 month of treatment with 10 mg q.d.s. of cisapride.

RESULTS

Heartburn frequency and postprandial fullness were both significantly (P < 0. 05) reduced after cisapride treatment. Acid contact time was not significantly changed. The percentage of 2-4 cpm activity in the electrogastrographic analysis was significantly (P < 0.05) increased with cisapride treatment, and the instability coefficient was significantly (P < 0.05) diminished with cisapride treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhanced gastric functioning and reduction in heartburn suggest that cisapride is efficacious in the treatment of older adults with symptomatic GERD, and that gastric dysrhythmias and postprandial fullness are resolved with cisapride treatment.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease in the older patient: presentation, treatment, and complications

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common in the elderly. Patients often complain of less severe or frequent heartburn than their younger cohorts, but because of prolonged acid exposure over many years, the elderly have more complicated reflux disease including esophagitis, peptic strictures, and Barrett's esophagus. Potential factors aggravating GERD in the elderly include medications, which reduce lower esophageal sphincter pressure, higher frequency of hiatal hernia, impaired motility, and decreased saliva volume and bicarbonate concentration. Early endoscopy is indicated in all elderly patients with GERD, regardless of symptom severity. The medical and surgical treatment of GERD in the elderly generally follows the same principles as for any adult patient.

Cisapride in neurologically impaired children with chronic constipation

The efficacy of cisapride as a treatment for chronic constipation in children with severe brain damage was studied in 20 children. Each subject was randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with either cisapride (N = 10) or placebo (N = 10) for 12 weeks. Stool habits, total gastrointestinal transit time, colonic segmental transit times, and anorectal motility were evaluated in all children before and at the end of the treatment period. Although cisapride significantly (P < 0.05) increased stool frequency from baseline to week 12 and no significant change was documented in the placebo group, the mean change in stool frequency per week from baseline to 12 week was not significantly different between the two treatment groups. The use of laxatives or suppositories was significantly (P < 0.05) decreased by cisapride, but remained unchanged in the placebo group. Furthermore, cisapride significantly (P < 0.05) reduced rectal compliance but had no effect on total gastrointestinal transit time and colonic segmental transit times. In summary, in neurologically impaired children with chronic constipation, cisapride increased bowel frequency but did not alter the delay in total and segmental gastrointestinal transit times.

Reflux disease: the view of the internist

Pathogenesis of GERD is mainly concerned with a defective antireflux barrier to gastric and duodenal contents. Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation is thought to be the main mechanism by which reflux is permitted, but the mucosal exposure time to the refluxate, the nature of the refluxed material and oesophageal clearance are important mechanisms. The Internist only sees the 'tip of the iceberg' as far as GERD is concerned, and generally these are severe resistant cases of GERD. In this group, endoscopy is mandatory to assessing degree of inflammation and treatment is generally with proton-pump inhibitors, which have made the therapy of GERD relatively easy. Although treatment is effective, problems relating to safety of long-term profound gastric acid suppression, cost and effect on quality of life remain to be resolved.

[Therapeutic principles in gastroesophageal reflux]

Gastroesophageal reflux is a common disease. Its chronic course, even if mild, is sometimes complicated by erosive oesophagitis. Drug therapy acts against gastric acidity and motility disorders. Treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease has three aims: improvement of symptoms and quality of life, healing erosive lesions and prevention of symptomatic and endoscopic relapses. Non-drug measures are always useful, even if their efficacy is not well established. Initial therapy of a symptomatic reflux or mild oesophagitis is most of the time effective (antacids, prokinetics, H2 receptor antagonists). Proton-pump inhibitors are also effective in healing and preventing severe oesophagitis. Questions about long-term treatment adverse events with powerful acid inhibitors, such as hypergastrinemia and the risk of gastric carcinoid tumours seem to be resolved. Studies are requested to define the optimal long-term maintenance treatment with cisapride, H2 receptor antagonists or proton-pump inhibitors at low doses in prevention of symptomatic and mild oesophagitis relapses.

Treatment and prevention of relapse of mild oesophagitis with omeprazole and cisapride: comparison of two strategies

BACKGROUND

Oesophagitis is usually a chronic condition. Healing with omeprazole is often followed by early relapse. Combination treatment and subsequent maintenance treatment with the prokinetic cisapride may be of benefit in relapse prevention.

METHODS

Patients with endoscopically proven oesophagitis, grade I (n = 120) or grade II (n = 105), were randomized in an open fashion to receive 8 weeks of healing treatment with omeprazole 20 mg daily (OM) followed by 12 months of follow-up without maintenance treatment, or 8 weeks of combined treatment of omeprazole 20 mg daily plus cisapride 5 mg t.d.s. (OMCIS) followed by 12 months of maintenance treatment with cisapride 5 mg t.d.s. (CIS). Only the patients healed after acute treatment were included in the 12-month follow-up study for evaluation of endoscopic relapse.

RESULTS

In the group of patients with oesophagitis grade I (n = 58 receiving OM, n = 62 receiving OMCIS), healing rates were comparable for both acute treatment regimens. In the group of patients with grade II (n = 54 receiving OM, n = 51 receiving OMCIS), the healing rates were slightly but not significantly in favour of OMCIS after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. During the 12 months of follow-up, CIS maintenance treatment was associated with a significant reduction of relapse. In the group of patients with initial grade I oesophagitis, the relapse rates after 3 months were 20% in the OMCIS group receiving CIS maintenance treatment, compared to 48% in the group healed on OM without further maintenance treatment (P = 0.04). After 6 months, these relapse rates were 31% and 85% respectively (P < 0.001), and after 12 months 40% and 96% (P < 0.001). In the group of patients with initial grade II oesophagitis, they were, respectively, 20% vs. 39% after 3 months (P = 0.056), 41% vs. 78% after 6 months (P < 0.001) and 52% vs. 95% after 12 months (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this open study indicate that continued treatment with cisapride 5 mg t.d.s. (after initial healing with omeprazole 20 mg daily plus cisapride 5 mg t.d.s.) is beneficial in the long-term management of grade I and II oesophagitis: this treatment approach significantly reduces the high relapse rate observed after stopping healing treatment with omeprazole.

Pharmacological management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) ranges from episodic symptomatic reflux without oesophagitis to severe oesophageal mucosal damage, such as Barrett's metaplasia or peptic stricture. The multifactorial pathogenesis of GORD prevents medical cure of the disease. GORD is a chronic disease with a high tendency to relapse, requiring a long term treatment strategy in practically all patients. Complete healing of all mucosal lesions is not necessarily the aim of treatment in all patients. In milder forms of reflux disease, symptom relief is the most important goal. Many patients with mild GORD do well on symptomatic self-care with antacids and/or alginate. In addition, lifestyle changes should be advised to all patients: these improve symptoms and enhance the efficacy of therapy. In the acute treatment of GORD the prokinetic drug cisapride has been shown to be effective in relieving symptoms and healing grade I to II oesophagitis. Cisapride decreases symptomatic and endoscopic relapse in patients with mild GORD. Histamine H2-receptor antagonists are effective in relieving reflux symptoms in about 50% of patients, but with regard to healing, H2-antagonists appear to be mainly effective in grades I and II and not in higher grades of oesophagitis. Maintenance treatment with H2-antagonists is mainly symptomatically effective in patients with mild GORD. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) provide significantly higher healing rates of reflux oesophagitis than H2-antagonists, even in the more severe cases of oesophagitis and Barrett's ulcers. PPIs are also effective in patients with oesophagitis refractory to treatment with H2-antagonists. PPIs have become the drugs of first choice in healing of all patients with more severe forms of reflux oesophagitis, and increasingly also for patients with milder forms of oesophagitis, certainly those who fail to respond to other drugs. In maintenance treatment of GORD, PPIs are the most effective drugs, offering the possibility of keeping nearly all patients in remission with adjusted doses. Current patient data of up to 5 years indicate the safety of this strategy for this period, but the exact consequences of strong acid inhibition over a longer period still have to be clarified. At present, all but a few patients with GORD can be managed adequately by medical therapy.

Review article: drug therapy for reflux oesophagitis

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is a common disorder and symptoms can be mild to severe. Management of the disease should be individualized. Life-style changes are important for all patients. Drug therapy is often necessary but only very few patients with severe disease need surgical treatment. The purpose of this article is to focus on drug therapy and to review the clinical trials of all the drugs used for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Thereafter, judged solely on the data derived from these trials, a practical approach to the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is suggested.

Cisapride: a gastrointestinal prokinetic drug

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of cisapride, and to evaluate its potential therapeutic role.

DATA SOURCES

A computerized search of the MEDLINE database was used to identify English-language publications of cisapride data in humans. The MEDLINE search was supplemented by review article bibliographies. There was no attempt to limit the search to a specific gastrointestinal motility disorder.

STUDY SELECTION

The MEDLINE search alone identified 165 citations. Because of the volume of available human cisapride data, the focus of the efficacy section is on complete published reports of controlled clinical studies. Abstracts and uncontrolled data are discussed only when other information is unavailable to address important aspects.

DATA EXTRACTION

Information regarding study design, study population, results, and safety was recorded from each publication. The placebo response to gastrointestinal complaints in patients with motility disorders is high. Therefore, objective evidence of improvement was emphasized when documentation was available.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Cisapride stimulates the motility of smooth muscle lining the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, and colon, and increases the tone of gut sphincters in vitro and in vivo. In controlled investigations, cisapride was superior to placebo in relieving symptoms associated with reflux esophagitis, nonulcer dyspepsia, and gastroparesis. Similar symptom and healing effects were observed with cisapride and histamine (H)2-antagonists in reflux esophagitis. Cisapride was either equal to or superior to metoclopramide in relieving reflux symptoms. However, metoclopramide was associated with significantly more central nervous system adverse effects. Cisapride was well tolerated, with adverse effects limited primarily to the gastrointestinal tract.

CONCLUSIONS

Cisapride represents an attractive alternative to metoclopramide for the treatment of a variety of motility disorders. Because it addresses a primary underlying cause of reflux esophagitis, cisapride may also prove to be an effective alternative to acid suppressants in the management of this disorder.

Cisapride and ranitidine in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--a comparative randomized double-blind trial

Forty patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and oesophagitis, documented by endoscopy (grades I to III by the Savary-Miller classification) were randomized to participate in a comparative double-blind trial to receive cisapride (10 mg q.d.s.) or ranitidine (150 mg b.d.) for an 8-week period. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed immediately before the entry to the trial and after the 8-week period at the completion of the trial. The evaluable cohort included 37 patients who completed the trial, 18 in the cisapride group and 19 in the ranitidine group. Three patients were withdrawn from the trial; one on ranitidine developed severe anaphylactic reaction, one on cisapride severe dizziness and one on cisapride did not wish to continue on the trial. The results of the trial, regarding symptomatic and endoscopic improvement were comparable in the two groups. Both drugs were effective in controlling symptoms, such as acid regurgitation, retrosternal pain, retrosternal burning, epigastric fullness and discomfort (pain, burning, sense of pressure) and resulted in endoscopic healing of oesophagitis. With few exceptions, symptoms remained in remission 1 month after treatment in the majority of patients. Globally, both drugs were tolerated comparably, and adverse effects other than those which resulted in the withdrawal from the trial were minimal in both groups. The results of this trial indicate that cisapride and ranitidine, although of different pharmacological action, are comparable in their therapeutic effect in symptomatic improvement and endoscopic healing in patients with mild to moderate gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Two different dose regimens of cisapride in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis: a double-blind comparison with ranitidine

We conducted a double-blind study comparing two dosage regimens of a prokinetic drug, cisapride (10 mg q.d.s. and 20 mg b.d.), with a low dose of a H2-receptor antagonist (150 mg ranitidine b.d.) in the treatment of 155 patients with reflux oesophagitis as determined by endoscopy. The active treatment took 8 to 12 weeks depending on whether complete healing was found at endoscopy. Improvement in oesophagitis grades from baseline to endpoint was observed in 68% of patients in the 10 mg cisapride q.d.s. group, 83% in the cisapride 20 mg b.d. group and 81% in the ranitidine group (N.S.). At endpoint, the percentages of endoscopically cured patients with initial grades I or II were 52% for 10 mg cisapride q.d.s., 71% for 20 mg cisapride b.d. and 80% for ranitidine (N.S.). The proportional improvement of the overall reflux symptom score (60%) also showed no significant difference between the three groups. In the treatment of mild reflux oesophagitis (grades I and II) similar results can be expected from 20 mg cisapride b.d. and 150 mg ranitidine b.d. As the results of the two dosage regimens of cisapride were not different, the 20 mg twice daily regimen is preferred because it will improve patient compliance. It is concluded that in reflux oesophagitis grades I and II, the efficacy of 20 mg cisapride b.d. and 150 mg ranitidine b.d. are broadly similar.

Cisapride in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Prokinetic agents are being used increasingly in medical therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study examined the effect of 10 mg q.d.s., oral cisapride, or placebo, taken for 12 weeks, on 48 patients with symptoms and endoscopic evidence of GERD. Objective evaluation of benefit was obtained by endoscopy and biopsy, oesophageal manometry, acid reflux provocation test and 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring. Cisapride significantly increased lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (P = 0.003) against baseline and also against placebo, in patients (n = 9) with an hypotensive lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (P < 0.01). The frequency of dyspeptic symptoms was significantly improved in the cisapride group (P = 0.03). Antacid intake, global evaluation of symptoms and a VAS score for symptoms were all better than placebo but failed to reach significance (global evaluation by patients, P = 0.07). Overall, there was no significant improvement in oesophagitis at either 6 weeks (P < 0.05 > 0.3) or 12 weeks (P = 0.07). However, if patients with grades I and II oesophagitis at entry were excluded, cisapride had a significantly greater effect than placebo, 6 weeks (P = 0.05), 12 weeks (P = 0.04). In those with oesophageal ulceration, cisapride was significantly more effective than placebo in inducing healing. Gastro-oesophageal reflux was very variable on both 24-h pH monitoring and acid reflux provocation test. In spite of a 50% decrease in acid exposure on 24-h pH monitoring (cisapride group, mean % pH < 4 day: entry 18.9%, 12 weeks 9.6%), there were no significant intra- or intergroup differences for percentage of time < pH 4, or frequency and duration of episodes, neither pre- or post-prandially, day or night, except for the number of post-prandial episodes during acid reflux provocation tests, which decreased significantly more with cisapride than with placebo (P < 0.05). Thus, oral cisapride when taken for 12 weeks promoted healing of oesophagitis and improved symptoms in patients with GERD; although an increase in lower oesophageal sphincter pressure was observed and a reduction in acid reflux was measured, no significant decrease of acid exposure was seen.

Effect of cisapride on relapse of esophagitis. A multinational, placebo-controlled trial in patients healed with an antisecretory drug. The Italian Eurocis Trialists

The effect of a prokinetic agent, cisapride, on the relapse of reflux esophagitis was investigated in a randomized, double-blind trial conducted in 443 patients whose esophagitis had previously been healed with an acid antisecretory drug. Patients received cisapride, 20 mg at night, cisapride 10 mg twice daily, or placebo for 12 months or until endoscopic relapse was confirmed endoscopically. In 88% of all patients (respectively 133, 132, and 124), endoscopic data were available at discontinuation of treatment. In comparison with placebo, the two cisapride regimens prolonged both the time to endoscopically confirmed relapse (Kaplan-Meier analysis; P = 0.001) and the time to symptomatic relapse (P = 0.012). The life-table endoscopic relapse rates at 12 months were 51% for placebo, 32% for cisapride 20 mg at night (P = 0.005), and 34% for cisapride 10 mg twice daily (P = 0.02). Patients with more severe esophagitis before healing relapsed more rapidly during maintenance therapy, regardless of the treatment regimen. Adverse events were infrequent in all three groups. These findings indicate that maintenance treatment with the prokinetic drug cisapride prevents the relapse of esophagitis after it has been healed by acid antisecretory therapy.

Effect of cisapride on relapse of reflux oesophagitis, healed with an antisecretory drug

Maintenance treatment with cisapride was evaluated in 298 patients in whom reflux oesophagitis had been healed with antisecretory drugs. Initially, 34% of the patients had grade-I oesophagitis, 33% had grade II, and 33% had grade III. The patients were treated with 20 mg cisapride twice daily or placebo for 6 months or until endoscopic relapse was shown if this occurred earlier. Survival analysis showed that cisapride significantly prolonged the time to endoscopic relapse in grade-I patients (P = 0.02). The intergroup difference in symptomatic relapse in all patients was also significant (P = 0.010). The effect of cisapride was less clearcut in grade II or III, and/or in patients healed with omeprazole. Factors associated with early relapse were placebo therapy, prior omeprazole therapy, duration of pre-trial symptomatic period, and initial endoscopic severity grade. Adverse experiences were limited; diarrhoea was reported by 9% of the cisapride patients.

Healing and prevention of relapse of reflux oesophagitis by cisapride

Altogether, 138 patients were included in a study aimed at evaluating the effect of cisapride on healing and relapse of oesophagitis shown endoscopically. In the first phase of the study cisapride was given in an open fashion at 10 mg four times a day for 8 to 16 weeks, and healing was obtained in 69% of patients. Healing occurred later in patients with grades II to IV oesophagitis. The total score for reflux symptoms decreased by 67%. Eighty of the healed patients were included in the second phase. They were randomly assigned to double blind treatment with either cisapride 10 mg (n = 37) or placebo (n = 43) twice a day. Control endoscopy was performed when symptoms recurred or at the end of the six month trial. The cumulative percentage of patients in remission was higher (p = 0.06, survival analysis) in the cisapride group than in the placebo group, the relapse rates being 20% and 39%. The duration of remission tended to be longer in patients with a lower initial degree of oesophagitis. Adverse effects were no more frequent with cisapride than with placebo. In conclusion, cisapride is efficacious in healing oesophagitis, and, unlike other gastrointestinal prokinetic drugs or low dose cimetidine (400-800 mg daily) or ranitidine (150 mg daily), it may prevent relapse of oesophagitis.

Recent advances in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

The basis of treatment of reflux oesophagitis is change in behaviour and lifestyle. In the presence of mild symptoms antacids/alginate may be instituted. In case of Savary grade I and II oesophagitis at endoscopy, H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs), alone or in combination with a prokinetic or mucosaprotective agent, are the first choice of treatment. Drug treatment should be continued for at least 8-12 weeks. In case of resistance to treatment or in case of severe and/or complicated reflux oesophagitis, omeprazole should be prescribed. Maintenance treatment is necessary in patients with severe reflux oesophagitis and in patients with quick relapses, once therapy has stopped. Full-dose H2RAs are required to prevent recurrences. In case of resistance to H2RAs, omeprazole should be used. Anti-reflux surgery should be considered in patients, especially at young age, who have an insufficient response to medical management, due either to lack of compliance or to therapeutic failure.

Reflux esophagitis

The various therapeutic approaches for reflux esophagitis are to increase the competence of the antireflux barrier, to enhance esophageal clearance, to improve gastric emptying and pyloric sphincter competence, to coat damaged tissue, and, especially, to reduce the volume and pH of gastric contents. Of the prokinetic agents, cisapride is the only drug with proven benefit. Single-agent therapy with conventional-dose H2-receptor antagonists or sucralfate results in similar degrees of symptom relief and healing. Post-evening meal (PEM) dosing of H2-receptor antagonists appears to be a rational method of suppressing late evening gastric acidity, but on balance the symptomatic response of twice daily dosing is superior to once daily dosing. More rapid symptom relief and healing are achieved with high-dose H2-receptor antagonists and omeprazole. The significance of sustained a(hypo)chlorhydria remains to be established. To prolong the symptomatic and/or endoscopic remission, the therapy has to be continued long-term with high-dose H2-receptor antagonist, cisapride either alone or in combination with H2-receptor antagonist, or sucralfate with or without H2-receptor antagonist. In the elderly or complicated patient long-term omeprazole may be a justified alternative.