Pharmacokinetics and absolute rectal bioavailability of hydrocortisone acetate in distal colitis

Development and validation of HPLC-DAD and LC-(ESI)/MS methods for the determination of sulfasalazine, mesalazine and hydrocortisone 21-acetate in tablets and rectal suppositories: In vitro and ex vivo permeability studies

Controlled-release tablets and rectal suppositories of sulfasalazine (SLF) and hydrocortisone 21-acetate (HA) were prepared as recommended dosage forms for the treatment of acute episodes of ulcerative colitis, in patients who do not respond to monotherapy. A High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Diode-array method with a gradient elution mobile phase was developed to evaluate the production quality of both formulations (assay and dissolution profiles in gastric and intestinal fluids). Method's validation was carried out providing good linearity (r ≥ 0.9995), precision (RSD < 1.53%), recovery (96.9% - 103.7%) and limits of detection (LOD_SLF = 12 ng/mL, LOD_HA = 15 ng/mL). Experimental design and Plackett-Burman methodology was constructed to study the robustness of the analysis. In all composite substrates, a freezing lipid precipitation approach was used as purification step. The method was optimized by applying Central Composite design mode. The in-vitro/ex-vivo permeability studies of both formulations were evaluated by a Liquid Chromatography-Electron Spray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (LC-ESI/MS) +/- mode. The analysis of sulfamethazine (internal standard, SLM, m/z 279), HA (m/z 449, [M + HCOO]^-), SLF (m/z 399) and its active metabolite mesalazine (MSL, m/z 154) was performed using a C₁₈ column and gradient elution. The validation of the method met the requirements of the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) (r ≥ 0.9997, RSD ≤ 4.62%, Recovery > 95%, LOD_SLF = 1.28 ng/mL, LOD_HA = 1.07 ng/mL, LOD_MSL = 3.16 ng/mL). Based on the results, important conclusions were drawn concerning the role of excipients and SLF metabolism.

Pharmacokinetics and Rectal Bioavailability of Hydrocortisone Acetate after Single and Multiple Administration in Healthy Subjects and Patients

The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of hydrocortisone after rectal administration of a hydrocortisone acetate foam were determined after single and multiple dosing in healthy subjects as well as in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Endogenous hydrocortisone was suppressed by dexamethasone administration. Plasma levels were compared with those observed after intravenous administration of hydrocortisone. Only a very small part of the rectal dose (100 mg) was absorbed; the mean absolute bioavailability was 3.1% in healthy volunteers and 4.5% in patients. There was substantial intersubject variability. Although maximum hydrocortisone levels after single or multiple doses were significantly higher (about 70%) in the patient group, the systemic bioavailability is very low so that the risk of systemic side effects after rectal administration of hydrocortisone acetate foam has to be considered very low.

A novel mechanism of modulation of 5-HT₃A receptors by hydrocortisone

Modulation of Cys-loop receptors by steroids is of physiological and therapeutical relevance. Nonetheless, its molecular mechanism has not been elucidated for serotonin (5-HT) type 3 receptors. We deciphered the mechanism of action of hydrocortisone (HC) at 5-HT type 3A receptors. Single-channel currents from the high-conductance form (∼4.7 pA, -70 mV) appear as a series of long opening events forming bursts, which group into long clusters. Although they are very infrequent, subconductance events (∼2.4 pA) are detected within clusters. HC produces a significant concentration-dependent reduction in open and burst durations, demonstrating open-channel block. In addition, it increases the appearance of subconductance levels in a concentration- and slightly voltage-dependent manner. The amplitude of the subconductance level does not change with HC concentration and its open duration is briefer than that of full amplitude events, indicating lower open-channel stability. Dual effects are distinguished from macroscopic responses: HC reduces amplitude by acting from either open or closed states, and it increases decay rates from the open state. Thus, HC acts as a negative modulator of 5-HT type 3A receptors by different mechanisms: It acts as an open-channel blocker and it favors opening to a preexisting subconductance level. The latter constitutes a novel, to our knowledge, mechanism of channel modulation, which might be applicable to other steroids and channels.

Review article: appropriate use of corticosteroids in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids are a well-established treatment for active Crohn's disease and have been widely used for decades. It has become apparent, however, that a proportion of patients either fails to respond to corticosteroids or is unable to withdraw from them without relapsing. Furthermore, their use is associated with a range of side effects, such that long-term treatment carries unacceptable risk.

AIM

To review the evidence regarding the appropriate use of corticosteroids in Crohn's disease, along with their side effects, safety and alternatives.

METHODS

To collect relevant articles, a PubMed search was performed from 1966 to November 2006 using the terms 'steroid', 'corticosteroid', 'glucocorticoid', 'prednisolone', 'prednisone', 'methylprednisolone', 'hydrocortisone', 'dexamethasone' and 'budesonide' in combination with 'Crohn(s) disease'. Relevant articles were reviewed, as were their reference lists to identify further articles.

RESULTS

When used correctly, corticosteroids are a highly effective, well tolerated, cheap and generally safe treatment for active Crohn' disease. Nevertheless, approximately 50% of recipients will either fail to respond (steroid-resistant) or will be steroid dependent at 1 year. Newer alternatives to corticosteroids are not, however, without risk themselves and, moreover, are not necessarily available universally.

CONCLUSIONS

Steroids are used widely to treat Crohn's disease, a situation that is unlikely to change in the near future. Accordingly, efforts should be made to ensure that they are used correctly and that their side effects are minimized. Reference is made to recently published guidelines and a simplified 'users guide' is presented.

Review article: systemic and topical steroids in inflammatory bowel disease

Steroids are still widely used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. Pharmacological studies have shown that there is no major abnormality in the pharmacokinetics of steroids in these disorders. Foam preparations with rectal application decrease the bioavailability to low levels, eliminating systemic complications. For oral use, 'nonsystemic' steroids have been developed. In ulcerative colitis, steroids are rarely needed as 5-aminosalicylates are effective in the majority of patients. This is true for rectal application in distal colitis, as well as in more extensive disease. In Crohn's disease, steroids are more often used; however, in population-based studies, less than 50% of patients have been treated with steroids, as there are alternative treatments available for the large group of patients with mild to moderate activity. For those patients needing steroid treatment, budesonide seems to be a good choice in active disease, but has not shown convincing effects in the maintenance of remission over longer periods of time. There is no place for long-term steroid treatment in ulcerative colitis and very little in Crohn's disease--immunosuppression with azathioprine or related drugs is certainly the better alternative.

Comparative tolerability of treatments for inflammatory bowel disease

Despite limited understanding of therapeutic aetiopathogenesis of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, there is a strong evidence base for the efficacy of pharmacological and biological therapies. It is equally important to recognise toxicity of the medical armamentarium for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Sulfasalazine consists of sulfapyridine linked to 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) via an azo bond. Common adverse effects related to sulfapyridine 'intolerance' include headache, nausea, anorexia, and malaise. Other allergic or toxic adverse effects include fever, rash, haemolytic anaemia, hepatitis, pancreatitis, paradoxical worsening of colitis, and reversible sperm abnormalities. The newer 5-ASA agents were developed to deliver the active ingredient of sulfasalazine while minimising adverse effects. Adverse effects are infrequent but may include nausea, dyspepsia and headache. Olsalazine may cause a secretory diarrhoea. Uncommon hypersensitivity reactions, including worsening of colitis, pancreatitis, pericarditis and nephritis, have also been reported. Corticosteroids are commonly prescribed for treatment of moderate to severe IBD. Despite short term efficacy, corticosteroids have numerous adverse effects that preclude their long term use. Adverse effects include acne, fluid retention, fat redistribution, hypertension, hyperglycaemia, psycho-neurological disturbances, cataracts, adrenal suppression, growth failure in children, and osteonecrosis. Newer corticosteroid preparations offer potential for targeted therapy and less corticosteroid-related adverse effects. Azathioprine and mercaptopurine are associated with pancreatitis in 3 to 15% of patients that resolves upon drug cessation. Bone marrow suppression is dose related and may be delayed. The adverse effects of methotrexate include nausea, leucopenia and, rarely, hypersensitivity pneumonia or hepatic fibrosis. Common adverse effects of cyclosporin include nephrotoxicity, hypertension, headache, gingival hyperplasia, hyperkalaemia, paresthesias, and tremors. These adverse effects usually abate with dose reduction or cessation of therapy. Seizures and opportunistic infections have also been reported. Antibacterials are commonly employed as primary therapy for Crohn's disease. Common adverse effects of metronidazole include nausea and a metallic taste. Peripheral neuropathy can occur with prolonged administration. Ciprofloxacin and other antibacterials may be beneficial in those intolerant to metronidazole. Newer immunosuppressive agents previously reserved for transplant recipients are under investigation for IBD. Tacrolimus has an adverse effect profile similar to cyclosporin, and may cause renal insufficiency. Mycophenolate mofetil, a purine synthesis inhibitor, has primarily gastrointestinal adverse effects. Biological agents targeting specific sites in the immunoinflammatory cascade are now available to treat IBD. Infliximab, a chimeric antibody targeting tumour necrosis factor-or has been well tolerated in clinical trials and early postmarketing experience. Additional trials are needed to assess long term adverse effects.

Review article: refractory distal colitis -- explanations and options

Distal colitis refractory to standard therapy is a complex and challenging problem. Physiological differences between the right and left colon may be exploited for maximum therapeutic benefit. Over-reliance on oral therapy should be seen as one of the reasons for treatment failure and delivery systems should target therapy to the distribution of the disease in doses proven to be therapeutically beneficial. The clinician should also be cognizant of potential adverse effects of standard therapies, particularly colitis due to mesalazine, which may mimic worsening disease. Numerous endogenous and exogenous factors that may exacerbate the underlying inflammatory bowel disease are discussed. This review explores the potential mechanisms why distal colitis may be refractory to therapy and addresses newer therapies that, while still in the investigatory stages, offer hope for a widening armamentarium of therapeutic modalities.