A prospective 1-year follow-up study in patients with functional or organic dyspepsia: changes in gastrointestinal symptoms, mental distress and fear of serious illness

Randomized trial in postprandial functional dyspepsia: Reassurance and diagnostic explanation with or without traditional dietary advice

BACKGROUND

Almost 80% of individuals with functional dyspepsia experience meal-related symptoms and are diagnosed with postprandial distress syndrome (PDS). However, studies evaluating dietary modifications in PDS are sparse. We performed a single-center randomized trial comparing reassurance and diagnostic explanation (RADE) with or without traditional dietary advice (TDA) in PDS.

METHODS

Following a normal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, individuals with PDS were randomized to a leaflet providing RADE ± TDA; the latter recommending small, regular meals and reducing the intake of caffeine/alcohol/fizzy drinks and high-fat/processed/spicy foods. Questionnaires were completed over 4 weeks, including self-reported adequate relief of dyspeptic symptoms, and the validated Leuven Postprandial Distress Scale (LPDS), Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, and Nepean Dyspepsia Index for quality of life. The primary endpoint(s) to define clinical response were (i) ≥50% adequate relief of dyspeptic symptoms and (ii) >0.5-point reduction in the PDS subscale of the LPDS (calculated as the mean scores for early satiety, postprandial fullness, and upper abdominal bloating).

KEY RESULTS

Of the 53 patients with PDS, 27 were assigned RADE-alone and 26 to additional TDA. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, with a mean age of 39 years, 70% female, 83% white British, and coexistent irritable bowel syndrome in 66%. The primary endpoints of (i) adequate relief of dyspeptic symptoms were met by 33% (n = 9) assigned RADE-alone versus 39% (n = 10) with TDA; p-value = 0.70, while (ii) a reduction of >0.5 points in the PDS subscale was met by 37% (n = 10) assigned RADE-alone versus 27% (n = 7) with TDA; p-value = 0.43. Response rates did not differ according to irritable bowel syndrome status. There were no significant between-group changes in the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale and dyspepsia quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

This study of predominantly white British patients with PDS found the addition of TDA did not lead to significantly greater symptom reduction compared with RADE alone. Alternate dietary strategies should be explored in this cohort.

History-taking, Clinical Signs, Tests and Scores for Detection of Non-organic Dyspepsia (NOD) Among Patients With Acute Abdominal Pain (AAP)

BACKGROUND/AIM

The diagnostic accuracy of history-taking, clinical signs and tests and diagnostic scores (DSs) for patients with non-organic dyspepsia (NOD) have been rarely evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cohort of 1333 patients presenting with acute abdominal pain (AAP) were studied, including 50 patients with confirmed NOD. The most significant diagnostic variables (in multivariate logistic regression analysis) were used to construct six different DS models and their diagnostic accuracy was compared with clinical symptoms and signs and tests. Meta-analytical techniques were used to detect the summary sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) estimates for each data set (symptoms, signs and tests as well as DS models).

RESULTS

In hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) analysis, the area under curve (AUC) values for i) symptoms ii) signs and tests iii) DS were as follows: i) AUC=0.608 [95% confidence interval (CI)=0.550-0.666]; ii) AUC=0.621 (95% CI=0.570-0.672) and iii) AUC=0.877 (95% CI=0.835-0.919). The differences between these AUC values (roccomp analysis) are as follows: between i) and ii) p=0.715; between i) and iii) p<0.0001; between ii) and iii) p<0.0001.

CONCLUSION

The present study is the first to provide evidence that the DS could be used in diagnosis of NOD. The major advantage of our DS is that this model does not need radiology or endoscopy to reach high diagnostic accuracy.

Anxiety Is Linked to New-Onset Dyspepsia in the Swedish Population: A 10-Year Follow-up Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is associated with anxiety but it is not clear if one causes the other. We investigated whether anxiety and depression precede the onset of FD (based on the modified Rome III criteria) and gastroesophageal reflux symptoms (GERS) in a population-based follow-up study.

METHODS

Participants from the Kalixanda study (n = 3000), randomly selected from the national population register of Sweden, were given the validated Abdominal Symptom Questionnaire 1998-2001; 1000 of these participants then were selected randomly to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy and were given the Abdominal Symptom Questionnaire along with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire. All eligible subjects who underwent endoscopy (n = 887) were invited to participate in a follow-up study in June-August 2010 and were given the same questionnaires. Data were analyzed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 703 subjects who completed the follow-up questionnaires (79.3%); 110 were found to have FD at baseline (15.6%) and 93 at the follow-up examination (13.3%); 48 of these were new cases of FD. GERS without organic disease was reported by 273 individuals (38.8%) at baseline and by 280 at follow-up examination (39.8%); 93 cases were new. Major anxiety was associated with FD at the follow-up evaluation (odds ratio [OR], 6.30; 99% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-24.16). Anxiety was associated with postprandial distress syndrome at baseline (OR, 4.83; 99% CI, 1.24-18.76) and at the follow-up examination (OR, 8.12; 99% CI, 2.13-30.85), but not with epigastric pain syndrome. Anxiety at baseline was associated with new-onset FD at the follow-up examination (OR, 7.61; 99% CI, 1.21-47.73), but not with GERS.

CONCLUSIONS

In a study of the Swedish population, anxiety at baseline, but not depression, increased the risk for development of FD by 7.6-fold in the next 10 years. Anxiety did not affect risk for GERS.

Dyspepsia is strongly associated with major depression and generalised anxiety disorder - a community study

BACKGROUND

The relationship between dyspepsia and psychiatric comorbidity such as anxiety and depression is poorly defined. Previous studies have been limited by lack of standardised diagnostic criteria.

AIM

To examine the prevalence and comorbidity of dyspepsia as defined by Rome III (6-month duration) with DSM-IV-TR generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive episodes (MDE) in the general population.

METHODS

A random population-based telephone survey was done using a questionnaire on symptoms of Rome III Dyspepsia, DSM-IV-TR GAD and MDE and their chronological relationship.

RESULTS

Of the 2011 respondents 8.0% currently had Rome III Dyspepsia, 3.8% reported GAD and 12.4% reported MDE respectively. Dyspeptic subjects had a twofold increased risk of GAD (OR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.06-3.89, P < 0.001) and a threefold increased risk of MDE (OR = 3.56, 95% CI: 2.33-5.43, P < 0.001). MDE and GAD most often coincided with dyspepsia in onset. Dyspepsia (OR = 2.48, 95% CI: 1.65-3.72 P < 0.001), MDE (OR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.64-3.46, P < 0.001) and female sex (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.21-2.23, P < 0.001) independently predicted frequent medical consultations. GAD independently predicted high investigation expenditure (OR = 4.65, 95% CI: 1.15-18.70, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

With stringently adopted Rome III and DSM-IV-TR criteria, dyspepsia was strongly associated and often coincident in onset with generalised anxiety disorder and major depressive episodes in the community. Excessive healthcare utilisation should alert clinicians to risk of psychiatric comorbidity.

Association between mental distress, gastrointestinal symptoms, and health-care utilization in functional dyspepsia: a prospective 7-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

The association between psychosocial factors and gastrointestinal symptoms is unclear. It has been proposed that they simply drive health-care seeking of patients. We therefore aimed to study whether mental distress would increase health-care utilization in functional dyspepsia (FD).

METHODS

171 primary care FD patients completed questionnaires screening gastrointestinal symptoms, mental distress, and health-care utilization between 1993 and 2000. These included the Bowel Disease Questionnaire and 12-item General Health Questionnaire. The patients' medical records were reviewed in primary care centers, Kuopio University Hospital, local hospitals, and private clinics.

RESULTS

The majority of patients revisited their general practitioner (GP), and most of them were prescribed antisecretory medication. Repeated gastroscopy and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy were performed in 26% of the patients. A radiological reinvestigation, usually upper abdominal ultrasound, was performed in one-third. Nine percent were hospitalized due to gastrointestinal reasons. A single additional bowel symptom increased the probability of repeated endoscopy by 19%, a visit to the GP by 19%, and an inpatient period by 51%. Neither an increase in the dyspepsia score nor the presence of mental distress or suspicion of serious illness increased the probability of health-care utilization.

CONCLUSION

There is no association between mental distress and health-care utilization for gastrointestinal symptoms.

Anxiety is associated with uninvestigated and functional dyspepsia (Rome III criteria) in a Swedish population-based study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The Rome III criteria for functional dyspepsia have been changed to include 2 distinct syndromes: postprandial distress syndrome and epigastric pain syndrome. We investigated risk factors for functional dyspepsia among the functional dyspepsia subgroups defined by the Rome III criteria.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional population-based study in a primary care setting (the Kalixanda study). A random sample (n = 2860) of the adult population from 2 northern Swedish municipalities (n = 21,610) was surveyed using a validated postal questionnaire to assess gastrointestinal symptoms (response rate, 74.2%; n = 2122). A randomly selected subgroup (n = 1001) of responders was invited to undergo an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (participation rate, 73.3%) including biopsy specimen collection, Helicobacter pylori culture and serology, and symptom assessments.

RESULTS

Of the 1001 subjects examined by endoscopy, 202 (20.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 17.7-22.7) were classified as having uninvestigated dyspepsia and 157 (15.7%; 95% CI, 13.4-18.0) as having functional dyspepsia. Major anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score > or = 11) was associated with uninvestigated dyspepsia (odds ratio [OR], 3.01; 95% CI, 1.39-6.54), as was obesity (body mass index > or = 30 kg/m(2)) (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.15-3.01). Major anxiety was associated with functional dyspepsia and postprandial distress syndrome (OR of 2.56 [95% CI, 1.06-6.19] and 4.35 [95% CI, 1.81-10.46], respectively), as was use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (OR, 2.49 [95% CI, 1.29-4.78] and 2.75 [95% CI, 1.38-5.50], respectively). Depression was not associated with any dyspepsia group.

CONCLUSIONS

Anxiety but not depression is linked to uninvestigated dyspepsia, functional dyspepsia, and postprandial distress syndrome but not to epigastric pain syndrome.

Gastrointestinal symptoms in primary care: prevalence and association with depression and anxiety

OBJECTIVE

Results from general population studies suggest a relationship between gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, depression, and anxiety. However, no primary care study has investigated this issue. This study investigates the prevalence of GI symptoms in primary care and their association with depression and anxiety.

METHOD

Within a cross-sectional survey, 2091 consecutive patients from 15 primary care clinics in the United States completed self-report questionnaires regarding GI symptoms [15-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15)], anxiety [seven-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)], and depression (PHQ-8). Of those, 965 randomly selected patients additionally underwent a criterion standard diagnostic telephone interview (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV) for the most common anxiety disorders.

RESULTS

A total of 380 [18% (95% CI, 16.3% to 19.3%)] patients reported to be substantially bothered by at least one GI symptom in the previous 4 weeks. The prevalence of severe levels of depression (PHQ-8 score > or =15) was nearly fivefold in patients with GI symptoms compared to patients without GI symptoms (19.1% vs. 3.9%; P<.001), and the prevalence of severe levels of anxiety (GAD-7 score > or =15) was nearly fourfold in patients with GI symptoms compared to patients without GI symptoms (19.4% vs. 5.6%; P<.001). Similarly, with each additional GI symptom, the odds for an interview-based diagnosis of specific anxiety disorders increased significantly: For example, compared to patients with no GI symptom, the odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) for generalized anxiety disorder in patients with one GI symptom was 3.7 (2.0 to 6.9); in patients with two GI symptoms, OR=6.5 (3.1 to 13.6); and in patients with three GI symptoms, OR=7.2 (2.7 to 18.8).

CONCLUSION

GI symptoms are associated significantly with depression and anxiety in primary care. It is suggested to screen as a routine for anxiety and depression in patients with GI symptoms and, if indicated, to initiate specific treatment.