Monitoring cardiac output using the femoral and radial arterial pressure waveform

Goal-directed therapy in intraoperative fluid and hemodynamic management

Intraoperative fluid management is pivotal to the outcome and success of surgery, especially in high-risk procedures. Empirical formula and invasive static monitoring have been traditionally used to guide intraoperative fluid management and assess volume status. With the awareness of the potential complications of invasive procedures and the poor reliability of these methods as indicators of volume status, we present a case scenario of a patient who underwent major abdominal surgery as an example to discuss how the use of minimally invasive dynamic monitoring may guide intraoperative fluid therapy.

The PiCCO Monitor: A Review

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring remains a cornerstone in the management of the critically ill. While rates of pulmonary artery catheter use have been declining, there has been an increase in the number of alternatives for monitoring cardiac output as well as greater understanding of the methods and criteria with which to compare devices. The PiCCO (Pulse index Continuous Cardiac Output) device is one such alternative, integrating a wide array of both static and dynamic haemodynamic data through a combination of trans-cardiopulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis. The requirement for intra-arterial and central venous catheterisation limits the use of PiCCO to those with evolving critical illness or at high risk of complex and severe haemodynamic derangement. While the accuracy of trans-cardiopulmonary thermodilution as a measure of cardiac output is well established, several other PiCCO measurements require further validation within the context of their intended clinical use. As with all advanced haemodynamic monitoring systems, efficacy in improving patient-centred outcomes has yet to be conclusively demonstrated. The challenge with PiCCO is in improving the understanding of the many variables that can be measured and integrating those that are clinically relevant and adequately validated with appropriate therapeutic interventions.

Measurement of Cardiac Output during Adult Donor Care

Measurement of cardiac output may improve hemodynamic management in donor care. Selected traditional and more recent methods to quantify cardiac output are reviewed. The accuracy or concordance of these newer methods when compared with thermodilution techniques that use a pulmonary artery catheter—the current reference standard—is discussed. Data directly comparing these systems for measuring cardiac output in the donor population are unavailable. However, data from groups of hemodynamically unstable patients favor selection of a measurement method that permits comparison (calibration) with a reference standard. A prospective comparison of all methods against the pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution technique among donors would provide the best data to resolve this clinical and potentially cost-important question.

Methods in pharmacology: measurement of cardiac output

Many methods of cardiac output measurement have been developed, but the number of methods useful for human pharmacological studies is limited. The 'holy grail' for the measurement of cardiac output would be a method that is accurate, precise, operator independent, fast responding, non-invasive, continuous, easy to use, cheap and safe. This method does not exist today. In this review on cardiac output methods used in pharmacology, the Fick principle, indicator dilution techniques, arterial pulse contour analysis, ultrasound and bio-impedance are reviewed.

Emerging trends in minimally invasive haemodynamic monitoring and optimization of fluid therapy

BACKGROUND

For decades the pulmonary artery catheter has been the mainstay of cardiac output monitoring in critically ill patients, and pressure-based indices of ventricular filling have been used to gauge fluid requirements with acknowledged limitations. In recent years, alternative technologies have become available which are minimally invasive, allow beat-to-beat cardiac output monitoring and permit assessment of fluid requirements by volumetric means and by allowing assessment of heart-lung interaction in mechanically ventilated patients.

METHODS

A qualitative review of the basic science behind the transpulmonary dilution technique used in the measurement of cardiac output, global end-diastolic volume and extravascular lung water; the basic science and validation of pulse contour analysis methods of real-time cardiac output monitoring; the application and limitations of these technologies to guide rational fluid therapy in surgical and critically ill patients.

RESULTS

Transpulmonary dilution techniques correlate well with pulmonary artery catheter-derived measurement of cardiac output. Volumetric measures of preload appear to be superior to central venous and pulmonary artery occlusion pressures. Dynamic indices of preload responsiveness such as stroke volume variation are more useful than static measures in mechanically ventilated patients.

CONCLUSION

In fully mechanically ventilated patients, dynamic measurements of heart-lung interaction such as stroke volume variation are superior to static measures of preload in assessing whether a patient is volume-responsive (i.e. will increase stroke volume in response to a fluid challenge). For patients who are not fully mechanically ventilated, pulse contour analysis allows real-time assessment of increases in cardiac output in response to passive leg-raising.

What's new in critical care of the burn-injured patient?

The number of cases of mortality after burn injury continues to decline, in part because of advances in respiratory, fluid, and sepsis management. However, care needs to be exercised in the application of these new techniques and technologies, many of which have never been assessed or have been incompletely studied in patients who have burn injury. Use of any of these advances in critical care needs to be individualized for any given patient and altered based on the patient's response to therapy. Future advances in the critical care of burns will require multicenter prospective trials at dedicated burn centers to define the optimal therapy for the patient who has burn injury.

Comparison of monitoring performance of Bioreactance vs. pulse contour during lung recruitment maneuvers

INTRODUCTION

This study was designed to test the hypothesis of equivalence in cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) monitoring capabilities of two devices: non invasive transthoracic bioreactance (NICOM), and a pulse contour analysis (PICCO PC) coupled to transpulmonary thermodilution (PICCO TD).

METHODS

We included consecutive patients of a single ICU following cardiac surgery. Continuous minute-by-minute hemodynamic variables obtained from NICOM and PICCO PC were recorded and compared in 20 patients at baseline, during a lung recruitment maneuver (20 cmH2O of PEEP) and following withdrawal of PEEP. PICCO TD measurements were also determined. We evaluated the accuracy of these two technologies at baseline using PICCO TD as reference and we estimated the precision by the fluctuation around the mean value (2SD/mean). Then, we assessed time response, amplitude response and reliability for detecting expected decreases when PEEP was applied. Type I and type II errors were analyzed.

RESULTS

CO values (PICCO TD) ranged from 1.6 to 8.0 L.min-1. At baseline, CO values were comparable for NICOM, PICCO PC and PICCO TD: 5.0 +/- 1.2, 4.7 +/- 1.4 and 4.6 +/- 1.3 L.min.-1, respectively (NS). Limits of agreements with PICCO TD were 1.52 L.min.-1 for NICOM and 1.77 L.min.-1 for PICCO PC, NS. The 95% statistical power gives an equivalence with a threshold of 0.52 L.min.-1 for NICOM vs. PICCO PC. The CO precision was 6 +/- 3% and 6 +/- 5% for NICOM and PICCO PC, respectively, NS. When PEEP was applied, CO was reduced by 33 +/- 12%, 31 +/- 14% and 32 +/- 13%, for NICOM, PICCO PC and PICCO TD, respectively (NS). Time response was 3.2 +/- 0.7 minute for NICOM vs. 2 +/- 0.5 minute for PICCO PC (NS). SV results were comparable to those for CO.

CONCLUSIONS

Although limited to 20 patients, this study has enough power to show comparable CO and SV monitoring capabilities of Bioreactance and pulse contour analysis calibrated by transpulmonary thermodilution.

Uncalibrated Arterial Pulse Contour Analysis Versus Continuous Thermodilution Technique: Effects of Alterations in Arterial Waveform

OBJECTIVE

To compare an arterial pressure-derived cardiac output (APCO) (Vigileo software version 1.07; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) and a thermodilution cardiac output (CCO) as methods for measuring cardiac output under different pathologic and experimental conditions that induce changes in arterial waveform morphology.

DESIGN

A prospective study.

SETTING

A university hospital, single institutional.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-two patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Simultaneous APCO and CCO were compared in low-risk patients undergoing elective coronary artery surgery (without valvular disease) (control, n = 20), patients with aortic stenosis (AS, n = 10), aortic insufficiency (AI, n = 10), and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP, n = 12). In the control group, additional data were registered before and after median sternotomy and phenylephrine administration.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In the control group, Bland-Altman showed a bias of -3% (95% limits of agreement: -59% to +53%) before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and of -1% (95% limits of agreement: -51% to +50%) after CPB. In the AS group, the bias was -5% (95% limits of agreement: -34% to +24%) before CPB and 1% (95% limits of agreement: -28 to +30%) after CPB. In the AI group bias was +32% (95% limits of agreement: -4% to +68%) before CPB and -2% (95% limits of agreement: -35% to +32%) after CPB. Median sternotomy decreased CCO by 10% +/- 10%, whereas it increased APCO by 56% +/- 28%. Phenylephrine administration decreased CCO by 11% +/- 16%, whereas it increased APCO by 55% +/- 34%.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac output measurement based on uncalibrated pulse contour analysis is able to reflect cardiac output measured with the continuous thermodilution method in patients undergoing uncomplicated coronary artery surgery. However, in situations in which the arterial pressure waveform is changed, agreement between techniques may be altered and data obtained with uncalibrated pulse contour analysis may become less reliable.

Continuous cardiac output measurement: arterial pressure analysis versus thermodilution technique during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

This study compared cardiac output measured with an arterial pressure-based cardiac output measurement system and a thermodilution cardiac output measurement system. We studied 36 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Simultaneous arterial pressure-based and thermodilution cardiac output measurements were compared before and after cardiopulmonary bypass, and after phenylephrine administration. Bland-Altman analysis showed good overall agreement between the two methods. Bias (limits of agreement) before and after cardiopulmonary bypass were - 0.21 (- 2.97-2.55) lxmin(-1) and 0.01 (- 3.79-3.81) lxmin(-1), respectively. Phenylephrine administration decreased thermodilution cardiac output by a mean (SD) of 11 (16)% and increased arterial pressure-based cardiac output by 55 (34)%. We conclude that arterial pressure-based cardiac output and thermodilution cardiac output measurement systems yield comparable results during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. However, after phenylephrine administration, the two measurement systems provided opposing results.

An evaluation of cardiac output by five arterial pulse contour techniques during cardiac surgery

The bias, precision and tracking ability of five different pulse contour methods were evaluated by simultaneous comparison of cardiac output values from the conventional thermodilution technique (COtd). The five different pulse contour methods included in this study were: Wesseling's method (cZ); the Modelflow method; the LiDCO system; the PiCCO system and a recently developed Hemac method. We studied 24 cardiac surgery patients undergoing uncomplicated coronary artery bypass grafting. In each patient, the first series of COtd was used to calibrate the five pulse contour methods. In all, 199 series of measurements were accepted by all methods and included in the study. COtd ranged from 2.14 to 7.55 l.min(-1), with a mean of 4.81 l.min(-1). Bland-Altman analysis showed the following bias and limits of agreement: cZ, 0.23 and - 0.80 to 1.26 l.min(-1); Modelflow, 0.00 and - 0.74 to 0.74 l.min(-1); LiDCO, - 0.17 and - 1.55 to 1.20 l.min(-1); PiCCO, 0.14 and - 1.60 to 1.89 l.min(-1); and Hemac, 0.06 and - 0.81 to 0.93 l.min(-1). Changes in cardiac output larger than 0.5 l.min(-1) (10%) were correctly followed by the Modelflow and the Hemac method in 96% of cases. In this group of subjects, without congestive heart failure, with normal heart rhythm and reasonable peripheral circulation, the best results in absolute values as well as in tracking changes in cardiac output were measured using the Modelflow and Hemac pulse contour methods, based on non-linear three-element Windkessel models.