Plasma, bone, hip capsule and drain fluid concentrations of ampicillin and flucloxacillin during total hip replacement after intravenous bolus injection of magnapen

The mysteries of target site concentrations of antibiotics in bone and joint infections: what is known? A narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Currently, antibiotic treatment is often a standard dosing regimen in bone and joint infections (BJI). However, it remains unknown if exposure at the target-site is adequate. The aim of this review is to gain more insight in the relationship between the target site concentration of antibiotic and the minimal inhibitory concentration to target the bacteria in bone and joint infections (BJI).

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was performed by Erasmus MC Medical library. Bone, bone tissue and synovial concentration of antibiotics were covered in humans. In addition, we reported number of patients, dose, sampling method, analytical method and tissue and plasma concentrations. We used the epidemiological cut-off value (ECOFF) values of the targeted micro-organisms. If more than 3 publications were available on the antibiotic, we graphically presented ECOFFS values against reported antibiotic concentrations.

EXPERT OPINION

For most antibiotics the literature is sparse. In addition, a lot of variable and total antibiotic concentrations are published. Ciprofloxacin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, vancomycin and linezolid seem to have adequate average exposure if correlating total concentration to ECOFF, when standard dosing is used. With regards to other antibiotics, results are inconclusive. More extensive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling in BJI is needed.

In vitro antibiotic activity against intraosteoblastic Staphylococcus aureus: a narrative review of the literature

Staphylococcus aureus – a major aetiological agent of bone and joint infection (BJI) – is associated with a high risk of relapse and chronicity, in part due to its ability to invade and persist in non-professional phagocytic bone cells such as osteoblasts. This intracellular reservoir protects S. aureus from the action of the immune system and most antibiotics. To date, the choice of antimicrobial strategies for BJI treatment mostly relies on standard susceptibility testing, bone penetration of antibiotics and their ‘antibiofilm’ activity. Despite the role of intracellular persistent S. aureus in the development of chronic infection, the ability of antibiotics to target the S. aureus intraosteoblastic reservoir is not considered in therapeutic choices but might represent a key determinant of treatment outcome. This review provides an overview of the intracellular pharmacokinetics of antistaphylococcal drugs used in the treatment of BJI and of their ability to target intraosteoblastic S. aureus. Thirteen studies focusing on the intraosteoblastic activity of antibiotics against S. aureus were reviewed, all relying on in vitro models of osteoblast infection. Despite varying incubation times, multiplicities of infection, bacterial strains, and the types of infected cell lines, rifamycins and fluoroquinolones remain the two most potent antimicrobial classes for intraosteoblastic S. aureus eradication, consistent with clinical data showing a superiority of this combination therapy in S. aureus orthopaedic device-related infections.

Oral Flucloxacillin for Treating Osteomyelitis: A Narrative Review of Clinical Practice

Flucloxacillin (FLU) administered by the oral route is widely used for treating various infections, but there are no published retrospective or prospective trials of its efficacy, or its advantages or disadvantages compared to parenteral treatment or other antibiotics for treating osteomyelitis. Based on published in vitro data and expert opinions, other non-β-lactam oral antibiotics that have better bone penetration are generally preferred over oral FLU. We reviewed the literature for studies of oral FLU as therapy of osteomyelitis (OM), stratified by acute versus chronic and pediatric versus adult cases. In striking contrast to the prevailing opinions and the few descriptive data available, we found that treatment of OM with oral FLU does not appear to be associated with more clinical failures compared to other oral antibiotic agents. Because of its narrow antibiotic spectrum, infrequent severe adverse effects, and low cost, oral FLU is widely used in clinical practice. We therefore call for investigators to conduct prospective trials investigating the effectiveness and potential advantages of oral FLU for treating OM.

Target site antibiotic concentrations in orthopedic/trauma extremity surgery: is prophylactic cefazolin adequately dosed? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and purpose - The incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in trauma/orthopedic surgery varies between different body parts. Antibiotic prophylaxis (e.g., with cefazolin) lowers infection rates in closed fracture surgery and in primary arthroplasty. For prophylactic antibiotics to prevent infections, sufficient concentrations at the target site (location of surgery) are required. However, dosage recommendations and the corresponding efficacy are unclear. This review assesses target site cefazolin concentrations and the effect of variation in dose and location of target site during orthopedic extremity surgery. Methods - For this meta-analysis and systematic review, the literature was searched using the following keywords: "cephalosporins," "orthopedic," "extremity," "surgical procedures," and "pharmacokinetics". Trials measuring target site antibiotic concentrations (bone, soft tissue, synovia) during orthopedic surgery after a single dose of cefazolin were included. Results - The search identified 14 studies reporting on concentrations in the shoulder (n = 1), hip (n = 8), knee (n = 8), or foot (n = 1). A large variation was seen between studies, but the pooled results of 4 studies showed higher concentrations in hip than in knee (mean difference: 4 ug/g, 95% CI 0.8-7). Articles comparing different doses of cefazolin reported higher bone concentrations after 2 g than before, but pooling results did not lead to a statistically significant difference. Interpretation - Although not all results could be pooled, this study shows that cefazolin concentrations are higher in the hip than in the knee. These findings suggest that the dose of prophylactic cefazolin might not be sufficient in distal parts of the extremity. Further research should investigate whether a higher dose of cefazolin can lead to higher concentrations and fewer SSIs.

Antibiotic penetration into bone and joints: An updated review

Treatment of bone and joint infections can be challenging as antibiotics should penetrate through the rigid bone structure and into the synovial space. Several pharmacokinetic studies measured the extent of penetration of different antibiotics into bone and joint tissues. This review discusses the results of these studies and compares them with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of common pathogens implicated in bone and joint infections in order to determine which antibiotics may have a greater potential in the treatment of such infections. Clinical outcomes were also evaluated as data were available. More than 30 antibiotics were evaluated. Overall, most antibiotics, including amoxicillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, cloxacillin, cephalosporins, carbapenems, aztreonam, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, doxycycline, vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin, clindamycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, fosfomycin, rifampin, dalbavancin, and oritavancin, showed good penetration into bone and joint tissues reaching concentrations exceeding the MIC₉₀ and/or MIC breakpoints of common bone and joint infections pathogens. Few exceptions include penicillin and metronidazole which showed a lower than optimum penetration into bones, and the latter as well as flucloxacillin had poor profiles in terms of joint space penetration. Of note, studies on joint space penetration were fewer than studies on bone tissue penetration. Although clinical studies in osteomyelitis and septic arthritis are not available for all of the evaluated antibiotics, these pharmacokinetic results indicate that agents with good penetration profiles would have a potential utilization in such infections.

Relationship between plasma and bone concentrations of cefuroxime and flucloxacillin. Three different parenteral administrations compared in 30 arthroplasties

(i) The objective was to determine the range of bone levels of cefuroxime and flucloxacillin achieved after one intravenous (IV) administration of different dosages of cefuroxime and flucloxacillin. (ii) Six groups of five patients participated in the study. The first three groups (A-C) received respectively 1500 mg, 1000 mg, and 500 mg cefuroxime intravenously and the second three groups (D-F) received 2000 mg, 1500 mg, and 1000 mg flucloxacillin intravenously. (iii) Parenteral administration of cefuroxime and flucloxacillin resulted in measurable bone concentrations in all patients. (iv) Large inter-individual variation in bone concentration was observed. (v) The bone concentrations of IV cefuroxime were higher (1500 mg, p = 0.0057; 1000 mg, p = 0.0260) than those of flucloxacillin. The bone concentrations of cefuroxime and flucloxacillin were dose dependent.

Plasma and bone concentrations of cefuroxime and flucloxacillin. Oral versus parenteral administration in 20 arthroplasties

Our objective was to determine and to compare the range of bone levels of cefuroxime and flucloxacillin achieved after oral and intravenous administration in 20 arthroplasty patients, allocated to 4 groups: 1 x 500 mg or 7 x 500 mg oral cefuroxime was followed by 2000 mg Flucloxacillin i.v.; 1 x 500 mg and 7 x 500 mg oral flucloxacillin was followed by 1500 mg cefuroxime i.v. Bone samples of hip and knee were obtained. Oral administration did not result in a measurable bone concentration of any of the antibiotics. Intravenous administration resulted in measurable bone concentrations of both cefuroxime and flucloxacillin, with large inter-individual variations. The bone concentrations of intravenous cefuroxime were higher than those of flucloxacillin, despite the lower dose. Oral pretreatment had no effect on the bone concentrations after intravenous administration. No accumulation of the drugs in bone was observed.

The treatment of infections in general practice with magnapen: a multicentre trial

This study was carried out in general practice. Six hundred and forty-seven infections of the respiratory tract, urinary tract and the skin and soft tissues in 646 patients were treated with oral Magnapen (250 mg ampicillin + 250 mg flucloxacillin) four times each day. An overall success rate of 94% was achieved. The main side-effect was diarrhoea causing 2.5% of patients to discontinue therapy. These results demonstrate the outstanding value of Magnapen in treating a wide variety of infections in general practice.