Effect of naproxen on glucose metabolism and tolbutamide kinetics and dynamics in maturity onset diabetics

Naproxen and cromolyn as new glycogen synthase kinase 3β inhibitors for amelioration of diabetes and obesity: an investigation by docking simulation and subsequent in vitro/in vivo biochemical evaluation

Naproxen and cromolyn were investigated as new inhibitors of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) in an attempt to explain their hypoglycemic properties. Study included simulated docking experiments, in vitro enzyme inhibition assay, and in vivo validations. Both drugs not only were optimally fitted within a GSK-3β binding pocket via several attractive interactions with key amino acids but also exhibited potent in vitro enzymatic inhibitory activities of IC50 1.5 and 2.0 µM for naproxen and cromolyn, respectively. In vivo experiments illustrated that both drugs significantly reduced serum glucose and increased hepatic glycogen- and serum insulin levels in normal and type II diabetic Balb/c mice models. In obese animal model, both drugs exhibited significant reduction in mice weights, serum glucose, and resistin levels along with significant elevation in serum insulin, C-peptide, and adiponectin values. It can be concluded that naproxen and cromolyn are novel GSK-3β inhibitors and can help in management of diabetes and obesity.

Potential role of salicylates in type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence base supporting the use of salicylates for glucose level control in patients with type 2 diabetes and provide a comprehensive review of available information describing the potential role of salicylates and, in particular, salsalate, for glucose control in type 2 diabetes prevention and treatment.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search using MEDLINE (1966-March 2010), PubMed, and Google Scholar was conducted using the search terms salicylates, salicylic acid, aspirin, salsalate, acetylsalicylic acid, insulin, glucose, glycemic control, diabetes, hyperglycemia, and nuclear factor. The bibliographies of identified articles were reviewed for additional citations.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All relevant English-language information on the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of salicylates for glucose control related to insulin resistance or diabetes prevention were reviewed. Preclinical data, clinical trials, and case reports were identified, evaluated, and included in this systematic review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Treatment of inflammation may be a potential novel strategy in prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes, in which the body is resistant to the effects of insulin. Previous and recent studies reveal a possible relationship between inflammation and obesity. The chronic activation of the immune system due to low-grade inflammation was found in several studies to be associated with obesity, and this, in turn, can promote development of insulin resistance and impaired glucose tolerance. Administration of salicylates was shown over a century ago to lower glucose levels in patients with diabetes. Many in vitro and in vivo pharmacologic studies have demonstrated a glucose-lowering effect of salicylates. Salicylates, especially salsalate, were found in several clinical studies and case reports to be potential agents for diabetes treatment with a favorable safety profile. Although these studies had inherent limitations, such as small numbers of patients and short duration, the vast majority showed significant glucose-lowering effects. A large randomized trial, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases-sponsored Targeting Inflammation with Salsalate in Type 2 Diabetes (TINSAL-T2D) trial, recently concluded that salsalate lowers hemoglobin A(1c) levels and improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Salicylates, especially salsalate, appear to be a promising treatment option for prevention or treatment of diabetes by lowering glucose levels. More extensive studies are needed to confirm the mechanisms involved and whether the effects are sustainable with continued administration of these agents. Further studies are warranted.

Human variability for metabolic pathways with limited data (CYP2A6, CYP2C9, CYP2E1, ADH, esterases, glycine and sulphate conjugation)

Human variability in the kinetics of a number of phase I (CYP2A6, CYP2C9, CYP2E1, alcohol dehydrogenase and hydrolysis) and phase II enzymes (glycine and sulphate conjugation) was analysed using probe substrates metabolised extensively (>60%) by these routes. Published pharmacokinetic studies (after oral and intravenous dosing) in healthy adults and available data on subgroups of the population (effects of ethnicity, age and disease) were abstracted using parameters relating primarily to chronic exposure [metabolic and total clearances, area under the plasma concentration time-curve (AUC)] and acute exposure (C(max)). Interindividual differences in kinetics for all these pathways were low in healthy adults ranging from 21 to 34%. Pathway-related uncertainty factors to cover the 95th, 97.5th and 99th centiles of healthy adults were derived for each metabolic route and were all below the 3.16 kinetic default uncertainty factor in healthy adults, with the possible exception of CYP2C9*3/*3 poor metabolisers (based on a very limited number of subjects). Previous analyses of other pathways have shown that neonates represent the most susceptible subgroup and this was true also for glycine conjugation for which an uncertainty factor of 29 would be required to cover 99% of this subgroup. Neonatal data were not available for any other pathway analysed.

Adverse drug interactions with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Recognition, management and avoidance

The prevalence and incidence of adverse drug interactions involving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) remains unknown. To identify those proposed drug interactions of greatest clinical significance, it is appropriate to focus on interactions between commonly used and/or commonly coprescribed drugs, interactions for which there are numerous well documented case reports in reputable journals, interactions validated by well designed in vivo human studies and those affecting high-risk drugs and/or high-risk patients. While most interactions between NSAIDs and other drugs are pharmacokinetic, NSAID-related pharmacodynamic interactions may be considerably more important in the clinical context, and prescriber ignorance is likely to be a major determinant of many adverse drug interactions. Prescribing NSAIDs is relatively contraindicated for patients on oral anticoagulants due to the risk of haemorrhage, and for patients taking high-dose methotrexate due to the dangers of bone marrow toxicity, renal failure and hepatic dysfunction. Combination NSAID therapy cannot be justified as toxicity may be increased without any improvement in efficacy. Where lithium or anti-hypertensives are coprescribed with NSAIDs, close monitoring is mandatory for lithium toxicity and hypertension, respectively, and aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) or sulindac are preferred. Phenytoin or oral hypoglycaemic agents may be administered with NSAIDs other than pyrazoles and salicylates provided that patients are monitored carefully at the initiation and cessation of NSAID treatment. Digoxin, aminoglycosides and probenecid may be coprescribed with NSAIDs, but close monitoring is required, particularly for high-risk patients such as the elderly. Indomethacin and triamterene should be avoided due to the risk of renal failure. High dose aspirin should be replaced by naproxen in patients on valproic acid (sodium valproate) and care is required when corticosteroids are administered to patients taking salicylates long term in high dosage. Interactions between NSAIDs and antacids or cholestyramine are generally avoidable. Adverse drug interactions involving NSAIDs may be limited by rational prescribing and by careful monitoring, particularly for high-risk patients, drugs and therapy periods.

Lack of effect of tenoxicam on dynamic responses to concurrent oral doses of glucose and glibenclamide

1. In a single-blind, placebo controlled study the influence of tenoxicam on responses of glucose, insulin and C-peptide to oral doses of glucose and glibenclamide was examined in 16 healthy male volunteers. 2. The subjects received once daily doses of 2.5 mg glibenclamide for 12 days. From day 5 through 12 eight subjects received concomitantly 20 mg tenoxicam once daily and the remaining eight subjects received placebo. 3. On days 1, 4, 5 and 12 glibenclamide was taken with 75 g glucose and blood glucose, serum insulin and C-peptide were measured over 5 h. Plasma levels of glibenclamide and tenoxicam (where appropriate) were followed over 10 h. 4. Characteristic parameters of blood glucose and insulin and C-peptide responses did not change significantly with time (day) and there was no difference between both treatment groups. 5. Baseline insulin increased from 11.7 mu l-1 on day 1 to 15.6 mu l-1 on day 4 (P = 0.009), likewise baseline C-peptide increased from 478 pmol l-1 to 530 pmol l-1 (P = 0.05), but there was no further change in the subsequent treatment period. 6. The AUC of the glibenclamide plasma concentration-time curve did not show changes with time or differences between treatment groups. The mean (s.d.) oral clearance of tenoxicam was 2.5 (1.5) ml min-1 and appeared slightly higher than in previous studies. 7. It was concluded that tenoxicam did not affect overall glycoregulation in healthy subjects under glibenclamide steady state conditions.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most widely used drugs. Drug interactions with this class of compounds are frequently reported and can be pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic in nature. The pharmacokinetic interactions can be divided into 3 classes: (1) drugs affecting the pharmacokinetics of an NSAID. (2) an NSAID interfering with the pharmacokinetics of another NSAID and (3) NSAIDs altering the pharmacokinetics of another drug. Although the pharmacokinetics of some NSAIDs may be significantly affected by the concurrent administration of certain other drugs (including other NSAIDs), this type of interaction only occasionally leads to serious complications. Concurrent administration of antacids or sucralfate may delay the rate of oral absorption of NSAIDs but generally has little effect on the extent. Use of antacids increases urinary pH, leading to increased renal excretion of unchanged salicylic acid and decreased plasma concentrations of this antirheumatic agent. The H2-receptor blocking agent cimetidine inhibits the oxidative metabolism of many concurrently administered drugs, including certain NSAIDs. Probenecid inhibits the renal secretion of drug glucuronides and this will lead to accumulation in plasma of those NSAIDs eliminated primarily by the formation of labile acyl glucuronides such as naproxen, ketoprofen, indomethacin, carprofen. Cholestyramine decreases the oral absorption of many concurrently administered drugs, including NSAIDs. It may also decrease plasma concentrations of those NSAIDs undergoing enterohepatic circulation (e.g. piroxicam, tenoxicam) by interrupting the enterohepatic cycle. Corticosteroids stimulate the clearance of salicylic acid, leading to low plasma salicylate concentrations. Plasma concentrations of many NSAIDs are significantly reduced when the NSAID is coadministered with aspirin. The clinical relevance of most of these interactions is not well established. However, in those cases where the interaction results in elevated plasma concentrations of the NSAID, special caution should be exercised to avoid excessive accumulation of the NSAID especially in elderly and/or very sick patients who may be more sensitive to the more serious gastroduodenal and renal side-effects of these agents. By virtue of their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, NSAIDs may significantly affect the disposition kinetics of a number of other drugs. They can displace other drugs from their plasma protein binding sites, inhibit their metabolism or interfere with their renal excretion. If the affected drug has a narrow therapeutic index, the interaction may be clinically significant. The pyrazole NSAIDs (phenylbutazone, oxyphenbutazone, azapropazone) inhibit the metabolism of many drugs such as the coumarin anticoagulants, oral antidiabetics and anticonvulsants such as phenytoin. Salicylates displace oral anticoagulants from their plasma protein binding sites.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Control of insulin secretion by sulfonylureas, meglitinide and diazoxide in relation to their binding to the sulfonylurea receptor in pancreatic islets

Sulfonylureas inhibit an ATP-dependent K+ channel in the B-cell plasma membrane and thereby initiate insulin release. Diazoxide opens this channel and inhibits insulin release. In mouse pancreatic islets, we have explored whether other targets for these drugs must be postulated to explain their hypo- or hyperglycaemic properties. At non-saturating drug concentrations the rates of increase in insulin secretion declined in the order tolbutamide = meglitinide greater than glipizide greater than glibenclamide. The same rank order was observed when comparing the rates of disappearance of insulin-releasing and K+ channel-blocking effects. The different kinetics of response depend on the lipid solubility of the drugs, which controls their penetration into the intracellular space. Allowing for the different kinetics, the same maximum secretory rates were caused by saturating concentrations of tolbutamide, meglitinide, glipizide and glibenclamide. A close correlation between insulin-releasing and K+ channel-blocking potencies of these drugs was observed. The relative potencies of tolbutamide, meglitinide, glipizide and glibenclamide corresponded well to their relative affinities for binding to islet-cell membranes, suggesting that the binding site represents the sulfonylurea receptor. The biphasic time-course of dissociation of glibenclamide binding indicates a complex receptor-drug interaction. For diazoxide there was no correlation between affinity of binding to the sulfonylurea receptor and potency of inhibition of insulin secretion. Thus, opening or closing of the ATP-dependent K+ channel by diazoxide or sulfonylureas, respectively, appears to be due to interaction with different binding sites in the B-cell plasma membrane. The free concentrations of tolbutamide, glipizide, glibenclamide and diazoxide which are effective on B-cells are in the range of therapeutic plasma concentrations of the free drugs. It is concluded that the hypo- and hyperglycaemic effects of these drugs result from changing the permeability of the ATP-dependent K+ channel in the B-cell plasma membrane.

Interactions of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

As NSAIDs are commonly used in patients receiving concomitant drug therapy, there is a risk of clinically significant drug interactions. Important interactions with NSAIDs involve one or both of two major mechanisms: pharmacokinetic (e.g. lithium, phenytoin and barbiturates) and pharmacodynamic (e.g. antihypertensive agents, diuretics). Prescription of a NSAID should be preceded by a careful evaluation of any coexisting pathology (such as renal dysfunction or hypertension) or concurrent drug therapy (such as anticonvulsant or anticoagulant agents) which may predispose a patient to the development of an interaction with potentially severe effects.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics other than salicylates

The largest group of non-narcotic analgesics are the arylalkanoic acid derivatives, comprising derivatives of arylacetic acid, propionic acid, heteraryl acetic acid and indole acetic acid. Common to all of these drugs is their inhibition of prostaglandin biosynthesis, which contributes to their analgesic and other pharmacological properties as well as to their principal side effect, gastrointestinal irritation. Although these drugs all cause some gastric microbleeding, they do so to a lesser extent than aspirin. The arylalkanoic acid derivatives, as well as the anthranilic acid and oxicam derivatives, are peripherally acting as evidenced by their lack of activity in classical tests of central analgesic activity. After oral administration of these drugs, their peak plasma concentrations are generally attained in 1 to 3 hours; absorption is not generally influenced by food. Volume of distribution is mostly low (less than 0.2 L/kg) and protein binding is high (usually 95 to 99%). Elimination is by glucuronide formation for several of the propionic acid derivatives and generally by biotransformation for derivatives of arylacetic acid, indole and indene acetic acid, and the oxicams. The elimination half-life of the arylalkanoic acid derivatives is in most instances about 2 to 5 hours, although notable exceptions include carprofen (approximately equal to 20 h), fenbufen (10 h), naproxen (12-15 h) and sulindac (16 h for the active metabolite). The elimination half-life of indomethacin varies considerably between and within individuals. Piroxicam has the longest half-life, averaging 45 hours. The pharmacokinetic properties of the anthranilic acid derivatives (fenamates, glafenine) generally resemble those of the arylacetic acids. Few clinically significant drug interactions are associated with concomitant administration of the arylalkanoic acids or piroxicam and other drugs. Since the arylalkanoic acids are highly bound to plasma proteins (mainly albumin) there is a theoretical potential for displacement reactions with drugs that are used at plasma concentrations high enough to exceed the binding capacity of their own primary binding sites. However, such reactions have rarely been reported. Although the concomitant administration of aspirin and several of the propionic acid derivatives results in a significant decrease in the plasma concentration of the latter, the clinical significance of such interactions is uncertain and probably minimal.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical pharmacokinetics of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

The number of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) available for clinical use has dramatically increased during the last decade. As a general rule, NSAIDs are well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, with the exception of aspirin (and possibly diclofenac, tolfenamic acid and fenbufen) which undergoes presystemic hydrolysis to form salicylic acid. Concomitant administration of NSAIDs with food or antacids may in some cases lead to delayed or even reduced absorption. The NSAIDs are highly bound to plasma proteins (mainly albumin), which limits their body distribution to the extracellular spaces. Apparent volumes of distribution of NSAIDs are, therefore, very low and usually less than 0.2 L/kg. The elimination of these drugs depends largely on hepatic biotransformation; renal excretion of unchanged drugs is usually small (less than 5% of the dose). Total body clearance is low and for most NSAIDs is less than 200 ml/min. The effect of age and disease on the disposition of NSAIDs has not been extensively studied. Due to the central role of the liver in the overall elimination of the majority of these compounds, hepatic disease will most likely lead to a significant alteration in their pharmacokinetic behaviour. NSAIDs have been reported to be involved in numerous pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Aspirin decreases the plasma concentrations of many other NSAIDs, although the clinical significance of this is uncertain. Due to the extremely high plasma protein binding of NSAIDs (around 99% in many cases), competition for the same binding sites on plasma proteins may be at least partly responsible for some interactions of NSAIDs with other highly bound drugs; however, another mechanism such as decreased metabolism or decreased urinary elimination is usually involved as well. The most important interactions with NSAIDs are those involving the oral anticoagulants and oral hypoglycaemic agents, though not all NSAIDs have been found to interact with these drugs. In clinical practice, there appear to be no clear-cut guidelines to assist the clinician in the selection of the most appropriate drug for an individual patient. The selection of an anti-inflammatory drug should be based on clinical experience, patient convenience (e.g. once or twice daily dosage schedule), side effects and cost. Since a marked interindividual variability exists in the clinical response to a given NSAID, clinicians prescribing these agents may try several of them sequentially until an adequate response is obtained.

Effect of pirprofen on glibenclamide kinetics and response

Pirprofen (a new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent), 200 mg 8 hourly, or placebo was administered orally to eight normal volunteers to investigate its effect on the pharmacokinetics and glucose and insulin responses after 1 mg i.v. glibenclamide. No significant changes were produced in these measures and in vitro studies showed no displacement of glibenclamide by pirprofen from plasma protein binding.

Naproxen up to date: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy and use in rheumatic diseases and pain states

Naproxen is a propionic acid derivative with analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity which has been widely used in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Naproxen has been well studied in rheumatoid arthritis and is as effective as aspirin but better tolerated, thus enabling more patients to continue with treatment. For this reason some clinicians now prefer to try propionic acid derivatives, such as naproxen, before aspirin in arthritic patients. In comparative studies with other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as indomethacin, ibuprofen, fenoprofen and others, all drugs were usually of similar overall efficacy although naproxen was sometimes preferred: but as with other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, not all patients will respond to naproxen and in such cases other agents should also be tried until the most satisfactory drug is found for each patient. Naproxen is also effective in degenerative joint diseases of the hip and knee, although further well designed studies are needed to more clearly define its relative place compared with newer drugs such as diclofenac or diflunisal. Results of other comparative studies have shown that naproxen is a suitable alternative to phenylbutazone or indomethacin in ankylosing spondylitis and to aspirin in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Naproxen appears to be effective in reducing pain and swelling in acute gout and is an effective analgesic in patients with pain following surgery or trauma and in pain of dysmenorrhoea. Naproxen has generally been better tolerated than aspirin or indomethacin at the dosages used. Because of its relatively long plasma half-life, naproxen can with convenieice be given twice daily, and there is some evidence that once daily dosage is as effective in rheumatoid arthritis.