Plasma binding of disopyramide and mono-N-dealkyldisopyramide

A rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay for simultaneous quantitation of disopyramide and its major metabolite, mono-isopropyl-disopyramide, in rat plasma and its application to a pharmacokinetic study

Disopyramide as an antiarrhythmic agent has been used for treating ventricular tachycardia and metabolized into its major metabolite, mono-isopropyl-disopyramide, by CYP3A4. We developed a novel, selective, highly sensitive, accurate, rapid method using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for the simultaneous determination of disopyramide and mono-isopropyl-disopyramide in rat plasma. This study is the first report for the assay validation using LC-MS/MS in biological fluids after simple protein-precipitation method. The most sensitive signals by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) showed at m/z 340.2 → 239.2 and 298.2 → 239.2 with same fragment ion for disopyramide and mono-isopropyl-disopyramide, respectively. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was determined at 2 ng/mL for both analytes and the linear concentration ranges were found to be 2-2000 ng/mL for disopyramide and 2-1000 ng/mL for mono-isopropyl-disopyramide. Finally, this assay was successfully applied to pharmacokinetic analysis of disopyramide and mono-isopropyl-disopyramide after oral and intravenous administration of disopyramide.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiarrhythmic drugs

Most antiarrhythmic drugs fulfil the formal requirements for rational use of therapeutic drug monitoring, as they show highly variable plasma concentration profiles at a given dose and a direct concentration-effect relationship. Therapeutic ranges for antiarrhythmic drugs are, however, often very poorly defined. Effective drug concentrations are based on small studies or studies not designed to establish a therapeutic range, with varying dosage regimens and unstandardised sampling procedures. There are large numbers of nonresponders and considerable overlap between therapeutic and toxic concentrations. Furthermore, no study has ever shown that therapeutic drug monitoring makes a significant difference in clinical outcome. Therapeutic concentration ranges for antiarrhythmic drugs as they exist today can give an overall impression about the drug concentrations required in the majority of patients. They may also be helpful for dosage adjustment in patients with renal or hepatic failure or in patients with possible toxicological or compliance problems. Their use in optimising individual antiarrhythmic therapy, however, is very limited.

Standards of laboratory practice: cardiac drug monitoring

In this Standard of Laboratory Practice we recommend guidelines for therapeutic monitoring of cardiac drugs. Cardiac drugs are primarily used for treatment of angina, arrhythmias, and congestive heart failure. Digoxin, used in congestive heart failure, is widely prescribed and therapeutically monitored. Monitoring and use of antiarrhythmics such as disopyramide and lidocaine have been steadily declining. Immunoassay techniques are currently the most popular methods for measuring cardiac drugs. Several reasons make measurement of cardiac drugs in serum important: their narrow therapeutic index, similarity in clinical complications and presentation of under- and overmedicated patients, need for dosage adjustments, and confirmation of patient compliance. Monitoring may also be necessary in other circumstances, such as assessment of acetylator phenotypes. We present recommendations for measuring digoxin, quinidine, procainamide (and N-acetylprocainamide), lidocaine, and flecainide. We discuss guidelines for measuring unbound digoxin in the presence of an antidote (Fab fragments), for characterizing the impact of digoxin-like immunoreactive factor (DLIF) and other cross-reactants on immunoassays, and for monitoring the unbound (free fraction) of drugs that bind to α1-acid glycoprotein. We also discuss logistic, clinical, hospital, and laboratory practice guidelines needed for implementation of a successful therapeutic drug monitoring service for cardiac drugs.

Comparison of the effects of cimetidine and ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of disopyramide in man

The widely prescribed antiulcer agents cimetidine and ranitidine have the potential to affect the absorption, metabolism or renal excretion of disopyramide. This study investigated the effect of a single oral dose of cimetidine or ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of disopyramide and mono-N-dealkyldisopyramide in six healthy volunteers. The treatment was conducted in a randomized cross-over design. Serum levels and urinary recoveries of disopyramide and mono-N-dealkyldisopyramide were assayed by HPLC. Cimetidine significantly elevated the maximum plasma concentration of disopyramide, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve and the total amount of disopyramide excreted unchanged in the urine, but the serum profile of mono-N-dealkyldisopyramide was not significantly affected. The effects of ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of disopyramide and mono-N-dealkyldisopyramide were not significant. The interaction between cimetidine and disopyramide occurred mainly at the site of absorption. The results indicate that cimetidine, but not ranitidine, significantly increased the absorption of orally administered disopyramide.

Comparative class 1 electrophysiologic and anticholinergic effects of disopyramide and its main metabolite (mono-N-dealkylated disopyramide) in healthy humans

During steady-state treatment with disopyramide, its main and active metabolite, mono-N-dealkylated disopyramide, was reported to reach concentrations that were equal to or higher than the parent drug in 25% of 70 evaluated patients. This metabolite has been found to have a more pronounced anticholinergic action than the parent drug on in vitro evaluation, but neither its anticholinergic nor its direct electrophysiologic effects on the human heart have been properly assessed. We therefore compared the acute electrophysiologic and anticholinergic effects (the standard being atropine, 0.04 mg/kg) of disopyramide and its main metabolite, given 2 mg/kg body weight intravenously to 10 healthy individuals in a double-blind, randomized, crossover design. The anticholinergic effect of these substances on sinus and atrioventricular node function was unexpectedly found to be of similar magnitude and more pronounced than previously thought (at least one-third the effects of the atropine dose). The class 1 electrophysiologic effects were as follows: intra-atrial and His-Purkinje conduction (the PA and the HV interval, respectively) was prolonged 33% (95% CI: 18-47%) and 27% (21-32%) by disopyramide, and 15% (10-19%) and 13% (10-17%), respectively, by the metabolite. Disopyramide also prolonged the QRS, JT, and QT intervals by 15% (9-21%), 10% (8-13%), and 10% (7-12%), respectively. The metabolite caused a 9% (7-12%) prolongation of the QRS interval (significantly less than disopyramide), but shortened repolarization (as reflected by the JT interval) by -7% (-2 to -11%; p < 0.01), which is similar to the acute effects of lidocaine 2 mg/kg body weight.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Interactions with the cardiac cholinergic system: effects of disopyramide and its mono-N-dealkylated metabolite

The cardiac vagolytic effects of disopyramide and its mono-N-dealkylated metabolite (MND), and their interactions with the cardiac cholinergic system, were assessed using in vivo and in vitro experiments. In chloralose anesthetized dogs, disopyramide phosphate (0.25 mg/kg/min) and MND at equimolar dose (0.173 mg/kg/min) reduced vagal bradycardia. As indicated by the ED80, MND exhibits a vagolytic activity 1.5-2 times less potent than disopyramide. Concomitantly, increases in heart rate and mean blood pressure were observed with disopyramide, whereas with MND only a rise in mean blood pressure occurred. In conscious dogs, where vagal tone is fully expressed, disopyramide and MND increased heart rate and, interestingly, prevented any atropine-induced additional tachycardia, though heart rate was relatively low. Binding studies on rat heart membranes yielded Ki values 2-2.5 times higher for MND than for disopyramide, and demonstrated that neither disopyramide nor MND binding modified the cardiac muscarinic receptor sites. Taken together, these results show that disopyramide exhibits a more potent cardiac vagolytic action than MND, very likely linked to a greater ability to bind to cardiac muscarinic receptors. They also show that disopyramide and MND are very potent in preventing atropine-induced "excess tachycardia", very likely by inhibiting the ionic pacemaker current(s) involved in its genesis.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of levorotatory and racemic disopyramide, at steady state, following oral administration in patients with ventricular arrhythmias

Electrophysiological effects, antiarrhythmic activity and kinetics of levorotatory disopyramide (R(-) DP) and racemic disopyramide (equimolar mixture of R(-) DP and S(+) DP) were compared in patients with ventricular arrhythmias. This double blind cross-over randomized trial was achieved, at steady-state, following oral administration of 200 mg three times a day. In comparison with baseline values, electrophysiological data indicated that R(-) DP and racemic DP prolonged, significantly and similarly, PR interval (+11.7% and +10%, respectively, P less than .01), and QTc interval (+9.2% and +7%, respectively, P less than .001), while QRS interval was not significantly affected. The antiarrhythmic activity, assessed by percent reduction in ventricular extrasystoles frequency, showed a similar efficiency of levorotatory and racemic DP: 80% and 74%, respectively (P = .24). Ventricular tachycardias disappeared with both treatments in the three patients concerned. During the racemic period, the mean total plasma clearance, expressed as CL/F, of S(+) DP (114.6 ml/min), was significantly lower than that of R(-) DP (157 ml/min), (P less than .001). The mean total plasma clearance of R(-) DP, during the levorotatory period (163 ml/min), did not differ from the respective value determined during the racemic period (P = .32). During the racemic period, the stereoselective difference in total plasma clearances, which is not observed when DP enantiomers are administered separately, may result from an increase in unbound fraction of R(-) DP, due to the presence of S(+) DP, which is known to be a potent displacer of R(-) DP.

Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations in the elderly. An update

There are numerous studies of drug handling in the elderly, but it is difficult to assess the significance of changes seen in vitro, or after single-dose administration, because they are often compensated by other mechanisms at steady-state. However, a knowledge of these studies is important as the results alert the investigator to possible treatment problems. The high incidence of adverse drug reaction in the elderly population leaves no doubt that improvements in therapy are needed. Research has been directed at seeking patterns of abnormality in the elderly on which to base recommendations for alterations in dosage regimens. The major shortcoming of this approach has been the failure to distinguish between the effect of chronological age on drug pharmacokinetics, and drug kinetics in elderly people with multiple pathology. The latter concern appreciates the variety of factors involved and the importance of treating each patient as an individual: presentation of mean data is confusing and misleading. The objective of drug treatment in any age group, but particularly in the elderly, is to administer the smallest possible dose which gives adequate therapeutic benefit throughout the entire dosage interval with the minimum of side effects. For most drugs the safe starting dose in the elderly is one-third to half that recommended in the young. Vigilance for potential side effects with plasma concentration monitoring, if available, should help keep toxicity to a minimum. When other medications are added or changed, the possibility of interaction should be anticipated. Methods for individualisation of dosage regimens and the use of sustained-release formulations in the elderly are discussed. Dosage alteration in the elderly in terms of reduced dose frequency, rather than dose size, may help improve compliance. A knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of a drug helps determine which approach will be most beneficial.

Direct enantiomeric resolution of disopyramide and its metabolite using chiral high-performance liquid chromatography. Application to stereoselective metabolism and pharmacokinetics of racemic disopyramide in man

A method for the simultaneous determination of disopyramide and mono-N-desisopropyldisopyramide enantiomers extracted from human plasma and urine is presented. Separation and quantitation were carried out using two columns coupled in series, and UV detection at 254 nm. First, the racemates of the two compounds were separated using a reversed-phase column, and then the enantiomers were separated using a stereoselective column packed with human alpha 1-acid glycoprotein. The mobile phase was 8 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.20-2-propanol (92:8, v/v). The coefficients of variation (%) for the plasma daily determination were 6.7% for R(-)- and S(+)-disopyramide at drug levels of 1.5 micrograms/ml, and 8.5% and 7.7% for R(-)- and S(+)-mono-N-desisopropyldisopyramide, respectively, at drug levels of 0.375 micrograms/ml. The method has allowed the study of stereoselective metabolism and pharmacokinetics of disopyramide after oral administration as a racemate.

The significance of plasma protein binding on the fetal/maternal distribution of drugs at steady-state

Maternal and fetal plasma differ in their concentrations of the important drug binding plasma proteins, albumin and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein, with albumin being slightly more concentrated in fetal plasma, and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein being only 37% of the maternal concentration at term. In general, these differences relate linearly to the bound to free concentration ratio of drugs associated with these proteins. Although only the free concentration is generally considered to be the pharmacologically active form, these differences can dramatically affect the total concentration and relative distribution of drugs between maternal and fetal plasma. In order to test our hypothesis that plasma protein binding is the major determinant of fetal/maternal drug distribution at steady-state, we examined whether fetal binding could be predicted from adult binding information. Data from studies of maternal plasma protein binding were used to predict fetal plasma protein binding based solely on the differences in protein concentrations. These predictions were compared with observed fetal binding data. This analysis showed a slope near unity and a high correlation (r2 = 0.900) which implies that there are no significant differences between the binding affinities of these proteins. A similar analysis performed using data on drug binding in non-pregnant adults gave an r2 or 0.971. Having established that fetal plasma proteins bind drugs similarly to their maternal counterparts, fetal/maternal plasma drug concentration ratios (F/M) were predicted for various drugs using information from literature on the drug's adult plasma protein binding, the protein to which it binds, and the fetal and maternal plasma concentrations of that binding protein.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of disopyramide on repolarisation and intraventricular conduction in man

Right ventricular repolarisation and refractoriness after therapeutic doses of disopyramide have been studied in 10 patients with coronary artery disease by recording monophasic action potentials (MAP) during programmed stimulation. Using 2 catheters, with the tip of one in the apex and the other in the outflow tract of right ventricle, conduction intervals for propagation of stimuli in the ventricle were also measured. Disopyramide increased the duration of MAP signals at 90% repolarisation (MAP90), the QT-interval and the right ventricular effective refractory period (V-ERP). The ratio refractoriness/action potential duration was slightly increased. Early premature action potentials were more markedly prolonged in relation to steady-state action potentials. The differences between the shortest and longest premature action potentials, however, were not changed significantly. The conduction intervals of the normal and premature paced beats were significantly prolonged. The observed effects of disopyramide on conduction and action potential duration may be of major importance for its effect on termination and slowing ventricular tachycardias. Its influence on the duration of premature action potentials in man is consistent with the results of in vitro studies.

Disopyramide. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cardiac arrhythmias

Disopyramide is a widely used class IA antiarrhythmic drug with a pharmacological profile of action similar to that of quinidine and procainamide. Over the past 10 years disopyramide has demonstrated its efficacy in ventricular and atrial arrhythmias. In therapeutic trials, usually involving small numbers of patients, the efficacy of disopyramide was comparable with that of mexiletine, perhexiline, tocainide, propafenone or prajmalium. Recent comparisons with quinidine have confirmed the similar efficacy and better tolerability of disopyramide. The suggestion from initial studies that disopyramide may be less effective than amiodarone or flecainide requires further investigation. In addition, studies have failed to demonstrate that the early administration of disopyramide after acute myocardial infarction decreases important arrhythmias or early mortality. Thus, disopyramide is now well established as an effective antiarrhythmic drug in ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias although its role in therapy relative to that of recently introduced antiarrhythmic agents is not clear.

Plasma protein binding of digitoxin and some other drugs in renal disease

Plasma protein binding of most acidic drugs is decreased in uraemia, whereas the binding of basic drugs is usually unchanged or decreased. Decreased protein binding in patients with renal disease mainly relates to drugs binding to albumin. Digitoxin binds to a specific site on the albumin molecule. Conflicting reports exist on digitoxin-protein binding in patients with renal disease. In ten patients with end-stage renal disease treated with haemodialysis we found only a slightly increased free fraction of digitoxin. A heparin-induced increase of the free fraction of digitoxin during haemodialysis has been reported. However, this increase was caused by the generation of non-esterified fatty acids in vitro. If this in vitro lipolysis was blocked, no increase of free digitoxin could be detected. Alterations of digitoxin-protein binding in uraemic patients during haemodialysis and during the intervals between haemodialysis treatments are small.

Free drug concentration monitoring in clinical practice. Rationale and current status

Recent advances in techniques to determine free drug concentrations have lead to a substantial increase in the monitoring of this parameter in clinical practice. The majority of drug binding to macromolecules in serum can be accounted for by association with albumin and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein. Albumin is the primary binding protein for acidic drugs, while binding to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein is more commonly observed with basic lipophilic agents. Alterations in the concentrations of either of these macromolecules can result in significant changes in free fraction. Diseases such as cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome and malnourishment can result in hypoalbuminaemia. Burn injury, cancer, chronic pain syndrome, myocardial infarction, inflammatory diseases and trauma are all associated with elevations in the concentration of alpha 1-acid glycoprotein. Treatment with a number of drugs has also been shown to increase alpha 1-acid glycoprotein serum concentrations. A wide variety of biological fluids have been examined for their ability to provide an estimation of free drug concentration at receptor sites. The most useful fluid for estimating free drug concentrations appears to be plasma or serum, with subsequent treatment of the sample to separate free and bound drug by an appropriate technique. The two most widely used methods are equilibrium dialysis and ultrafiltration. Of these two, ultrafiltration has the greatest utility clinically because it is rapid and relatively simple. The major difficulty associated with this method involves the binding of drug to the ultrafilters, but significant progress has been made in solving this problem. Several authors have endorsed the routine use of free drug concentration monitoring. Data examining the clinical usefulness of free drug concentration monitoring for phenytoin, carbamazepine, valproic acid, disopyramide and lignocaine (lidocaine) are reviewed. While available evidence suggests that free concentrations may correlate with clinical effects better than total drug concentrations, there are insufficient data to justify the recommendation of the routine use of free drug concentration monitoring for any of these agents at present.

Relationship between alpha 1-acid glycoprotein and distribution of disopyramide and mono-N-dealkyldisopyramide in whole blood

The binding of disopyramide (DP) and mono-N-dealkyldisopyramide (MND) was measured by equilibrium dialysis in spiked whole blood (10 mumol l-1 DP or MND) from 50 patients having a serum concentration of alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) ranging from 0.40 to 3.14 g l-1, as well as in whole blood from five healthy subjects, spiked with different concentrations of AAG ranging from 0.61 to 3.33 g l-1. The binding ratio (moles bound divided by moles unbound) in all samples increased from 1.0 to 8.0 for DP and 0.6 to 3.3 for MND with increasing AAG concentrations. The binding varied according to the AAG concentrations both in patients and healthy subjects. Similarly total and free plasma concentrations of DP and MND were also measured. With increasing AAG concentrations the total concentrations measured increased from 9.0 to 15.9 mumol l-1 for DP and from 6.8 to 11.8 mumol l-1 for MND whereas the free concentrations decreased from 3.8 to 0.5 mumol l-1 for DP and from 5.0 to 2.0 mumol l-1 for MND. With increasing AAG concentrations the whole blood/plasma concentration ratio decreased from 1.11 and 1.47 to 0.63 and 0.85 for DP and MND respectively. The ratio between their concentration in cells and the unbound concentration in plasma, however, was constant over the whole AAG concentration range. The mean ratios for all samples were 3.0 and 3.1 for DP and MND respectively, indicating that both compounds are bound or distributed to the blood cells. The distribution of the drugs in whole blood changed according to increasing AAG concentrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical pharmacokinetics of disopyramide

Disopyramide is an antiarrhythmic agent with proven efficacy in the management of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. The drug is well absorbed and undergoes virtually no first-pass metabolism. Peak concentrations are achieved approximately 0.5 to 3.0 hours after a dose. Absorption is reduced and slightly slowed in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Disopyramide is excreted as unchanged drug (two-thirds) or as the metabolite mono-N-desisopropyldisopyramide, with elimination via both renal and biliary routes. Elimination half-life is approximately 7 hours in normal subjects and patients, but is prolonged in patients with renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance less than 60 ml/min). Disopyramide exhibits complex protein binding. It is bound to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AAG), an acute phase reactant, and binds in a concentration-dependent (saturable) manner. The unbound fraction is reduced in the presence of elevated concentrations of AAG, as are found in acute myocardial infarction and in some chronic haemodialysis patients and renal transplant recipients. Free disopyramide concentrations are low relative to total concentration in these patients. Because the pharmacological effects of disopyramide are determined by unbound drug, changes in the unbound fraction could make total disopyramide concentrations misleading as a guide to therapy. Changes in protein binding do not, however, alter free disopyramide or metabolite concentrations, both of which are dependent only on dosage and intrinsic clearance. Free drug concentration measurement could potentially improve therapeutic monitoring, but is as yet of unproven clinical value. Disopyramide is cleared more rapidly in children than in adults, and therefore children require higher dosages to attain therapeutic concentrations.

Relationship between alpha 1-acid glycoprotein and plasma binding of disopyramide and mono-N-dealkyldisopyramide

Highly purified serum albumin did not bind either disopyramide (DP) or mono-N-dealkyldisopyramide (MND). The unbound fraction of DP and MND in highly purified serum alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) at 0.5 g/l was 57 and 62 and at 2.0 g/l 19 and 30% respectively. Unbound DP and MND were measured in spiked plasma (10 mumol/l of DP or MND), from 60 patients, having AAG concentrations varying from 0.4 to 3.0 g/l. Unbound drug varied from 13 to 58 and from 24 to 62% for DP and MND, respectively, and was inversely related to the plasma concentration of AAG (r = -0.9016, r = -0.9157). A linear relationship was found between the binding ratio (moles bound divided by moles unbound) and the plasma concentration of AAG for both DP (r = 0.9199) and MND (r = 0.9270), whereas no relationship was found between the binding ratios of DP or MND and the plasma concentrations of total protein, albumin, haptoglobin, alpha 1-antitrypsin or the immunoglobulins IgG, IgA or IgM. In patients on DP maintenance therapy, a linear relationship was found between percent unbound DP and the plasma concentration of DP in samples with similar AAG concentrations. Furthermore, a linear relationship was found between the binding ratio of DP and the plasma concentration of AAG in samples with similar DP concentrations. The present findings support the concept that AAG is the major serum protein responsible for the binding of DP and MND.

Physiological factors affecting drug toxicity

Physiological factors that affect the fate of drugs in the body and thereby have effects on their pharmacology and toxicology involve the systems that control absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. The main factors are disease, genetics, and age. Nutritional status, sex, hormonal status (e.g., the effects of pregnancy), and circadian rhythm have important influences. Maternal toxicity will affect the fetus. The absorption and excretion of drugs are frequently reduced by diseases. Excretion is reduced by impaired renal function, often found in the elderly, which may increase the toxic response. Distribution is affected by body weight and build, for example, the proportion of fat. The disposition of many drugs has been shown to be significantly influenced by circadian rhythms such that therapeutic doses may exhibit toxicity if administered at an inappropriate time of day. Metabolism is modified by environmental influences including previous food and drug experience, and various factors such as age, sex, and disease. Intersubject variations in drug disposition can be very great with possibly severe consequences for the individual; in this regard, knowledge of genetic polymorphism in drug metabolizing enzymes is rapidly increasing. The toxicology of a drug may be profoundly affected by a particular disease state, for example, the administration of a drug that might be a tumor promoter when a cancerous or precancerous condition exists. These effects are illustrated with examples from the literature and recent studies undertaken in the Bureau of Drug Research.

Drug binding in sera deficient in lipoproteins, albumin or orosomucoid

The relative role of lipoproteins, albumin and orosomucoid in the serum binding variation of various drugs was examined by separate removal of these proteins. Lipoproteins were removed from serum by ultracentrifugation, albumin by affinity chromatography and orosomucoid by immunoprecipitation. Removal of the lipoproteins did not affect the serum binding of the acidic (phenytoin) and neutral (digitoxin) drugs tested, nor the basic drugs disopyramide, quinidine or propranolol. A reduction in binding of amitryptyline, nortriptyline, doxepin and desmethyldoxepin was observed. Removal of albumin did, with some exception for nortriptyline, not affect the serum binding of the basic drugs tested. A pronounced reduction in the binding of phenytoin and digitoxin was observed. Removal of orosomucoid did not affect the binding of the acidic and neutral drugs tested. A reduction in the binding of all the basic drugs tested was observed, especially for disopyramide whose binding almost disappeared. Quinidine, propranolol, phenytoin and digitoxin all bound to isolated lipoproteins, but the removal of lipoproteins had no effect on the total serum binding for these drugs. Hence, the use of deficient sera provides valuable information as to the quantitative role of the various proteins in drug binding, whereas studies using purified proteins are often necessary to examine the mechanisms of the drug protein interactions.

Determination of disopyramide and mono-N-desisopropyl-disopyramide in serum by gas-liquid chromatography with nitrogen-selective detection

A rapid, reliable assay is described for the quantitation of disopyramide (DP) and its metabolite, mono-N-desisopropyl-disopyramide (MNDP), in serum using p-chloro-disopyramide as the internal standard and aqueous standards for calibration. The procedure involves extraction of the serum sample with diethyl ether, derivatization of MNDP with acetic anhydride, and gas-liquid chromatographic analysis with nitrogen-selective detection. The accuracy of the procedure is 97.8 +/- 10.3 (SD)% for DP over the concentration range, 0.25-10.00 micrograms/ml (n = 37), and 99.6 +/- 10.2 (SD)% for MNDP over the concentration range, 0.50-5.00 micrograms/ml (n = 18). The within-day coefficient of variation is less than 8% for DP and 12% for MNDP. The lower limit of quantitative sensitivity is 0.25 micrograms/ml for DP and 0.50 micrograms/ml for MNDP, and the lower limit of detection is 0.6 ng and 1.6 ng, respectively, for DP and MNDP. This assay has been used to determine the time-course of DP and MNDP and the protein binding of DP (without requiring an in vitro protein binding curve) in the serum obtained from patients and laboratory animals during DP administration.

Effect of ethanol intake on disopyramide elimination by healthy volunteers

The effect of ethanol intake on disopyramide elimination was examined in an open crossover study in six healthy volunteers. No effect of ethanol on the elimination half-life or total body clearance of disopyramide was found, although it did decrease the percentage of mono-N-dealkylated disopyramide excreted in the urine (p less than 0.05) as well as the relative metabolic clearance of disopyramide (p less than 0.05). The renal clearance of disopyramide was increased by 19 +/- 16% (p less than 0.05) in subjects in whom ethanol caused a diuresis.