Influence of atenolol and nifedipine on digoxin-induced inotropism in humans

In-depth mechanistic analysis including high-throughput RNA sequencing in the prediction of functional and structural cardiotoxicants using hiPSC cardiomyocytes

BACKGROUND

Cardiotoxicity remains one of the most reported adverse drug reactions that lead to drug attrition during pre-clinical and clinical drug development. Drug-induced cardiotoxicity may develop as a functional change in cardiac electrophysiology (acute alteration of the mechanical function of the myocardium) and/or as a structural change, resulting in loss of viability and morphological damage to cardiac tissue.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Non-clinical models with better predictive value need to be established to improve cardiac safety pharmacology. To this end, high-throughput RNA sequencing (ScreenSeq) was combined with high-content imaging (HCI) and Ca2+ transience (CaT) to analyze compound-treated human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs).

RESULTS

Analysis of hiPSC-CMs treated with 33 cardiotoxicants and 9 non-cardiotoxicants of mixed therapeutic indications facilitated compound clustering by mechanism of action, scoring of pathway activities related to cardiomyocyte contractility, mitochondrial integrity, metabolic state, diverse stress responses and the prediction of cardiotoxicity risk. The combination of ScreenSeq, HCI and CaT provided a high cardiotoxicity prediction performance with 89% specificity, 91% sensitivity and 90% accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this study introduces mechanism-driven risk assessment approach combining structural, functional and molecular high-throughput methods for pre-clinical risk assessment of novel compounds.

Positive inotropic drugs--digitalis

Digitalis glycosides inhibit Na+K+-ATPase in the cells and have been used for scientific studies of cation transport over cell membranes. Furthermore, digitalis has a positive inotropic and antiarrhythmogenic effect. Specific binding sites for digitalis glycosides have been observed in erythrocytes, the myocardium and the central nervous system. Transcellular transport of digoxin has been found in the kidney, since digoxin is excreted by tubular secretion. Recent studies have discovered an endogenous digitalis-like substance both inhibiting Na-K-ATPase and displacing digoxin from specific binding sites at the erythrocytes. The concentration of this component in plasma seems to be higher in hypertension than in normotension. Future studies will have to disclose other effects of this substance in order to evaluate whether it can be used as a drug in heart failure.

beta-blockers. Drug interactions of clinical significance

The clinician prescribing beta-blockers for his or her patients is faced with an often difficult situation. There are many beta-blockers, each with its own pharmacological profile. Patients are often taking multiple medications, thus increasing the risk of both anticipated and unexpected drug interactions. Reports of drug interactions are frequently anecdotal. The prescriber may not be aware of the patient's other medications or lifestyle habits. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions involving beta-blockers are documented in the literature, but these studies often examine small numbers of patients. For these reasons, it is difficult for the practitioner to distill guidelines for the administration of beta-blockers in conjunction with other medication. In general, beta-blockers are well tolerated, and symptomatic drug interactions are relatively infrequent. It is incumbent upon the clinical practitioner to have knowledge of his or her patient's drug profile and to be aware of the various drug interactions as well as each patient's unique pathophysiological profile when prescribing any medication, including beta-blockers. beta-Blockers may interact with a large number of commonly prescribed drugs, including antihypertensive and antianginal drugs, inotropic agents, anti-arrhythmics, NSAIDs, psychotropic drugs, anti-ulcer medications, anaesthetics, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, warfarin, oral hypoglycaemics and rifampicin (rifampin).

Investigation of possible pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between epanolol and digoxin

The possibility of a pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic interaction between epanolol and digoxin has been investigated in 10 healthy male subjects taking digoxin 0.375 mg daily for 14 days. During that period epanolol 200 mg daily or matching placebo was also given, each for 7 days, according to a double-blind, randomized cross-over plan. The plasma digoxin concentration-time profiles after 7 days of concomitant placebo or epanolol were comparable. Trough and peak plasma digoxin levels were similar (placebo: 0.84 and 2.62 ng.ml-1; epanolol: 0.87 and 2.46 ng.ml-1). The renal clearances of digoxin and creatinine were lower during treatment with epanolol, but the differences were not significant (placebo 142.0 and 126.5 ml.min-1; epanolol 105.7 and 109.3 ml.min-1). STI indexes were lower during treatment with digoxin plus epanolol, than after digoxin alone. The difference was significant for QS2I (513 versus 503 ms), PEPI (119 versus 112 ms) and PEP/LVET (0.286 versus 0.304). The observations suggest that in healthy volunteers there is no pharmacokinetic interaction between epanolol and digoxin, and that epanolol does not interfere with the positive inotropic action of digoxin.

Effects of oral prazosin on total plasma digoxin levels

Prazosin and digoxin are frequently coadministered in clinical practice. To determine the effects of oral prazosin treatment on steady-state digoxin levels, 20 patients receiving a constant maintenance dose of digoxin, who had normal renal and liver functions and were not receiving any other treatment, were given 5 mg of prazosin for 3 days. Plasma digoxin levels were measured before, on days 1 and 3 of prazosin treatment, and after prazosin had been discontinued. It was found that prazosin significantly increased plasma digoxin levels. On discontinuation of prazosin digoxin levels returned to their previous values.

Digoxin-felodipine interaction in patients with congestive heart failure

A possible interaction between felodipine and digoxin was studied in 23 patients with congestive heart failure before and after 8 weeks treatment with both drugs. A modest, non-significant increase in serum digoxin level 2 h postdose (+15%) was found in the felodipine group (n = 11) compared to placebo (n = 12), with no change in the trough and 6 h postdose levels. There was a bimodal distribution of the observed changes in serum digoxin level 2 h postdose: a significant increase (p less than 0.001) was observed only in patients with a high plasma felodipine level, which may have been caused by changes in the absorption rate in those patients. Changes in the elimination of digoxin after felodipine therapy appeared unlikely, since the trough and 6 h post-dose levels were unchanged. Analysis of the clinical characteristics, haemodynamics and laboratory values revealed no significant differences between the subgroups. The observed increase in serum digoxin warrants monitoring the trough and peak levels digoxin in patients with congestive heart failure who are also being treated with felodipine.

Esmolol-digoxin drug interaction

An open-label baseline-controlled study was conducted in 11 healthy male subjects to study the possible interaction between the cardioselective, short-acting beta blocker esmolol and digoxin when administered concurrently under steady-state conditions. Steady-state concentration, elimination half-life, and the total body clearance of esmolol were not changed significantly (P greater than .05) by digoxin. Digoxin peak concentration and the time to reach the peak concentration were not affected by esmolol. However, the digoxin AUC during the six-hour esmolol infusion increased from 2.60 +/- 0.59 to 2.88 +/- 0.75 ng.hr/mL (P less than .05). There were no clinically significant changes in the heart rate and blood pressure during this drug interaction study. The PR intervals were similar between digoxin monotherapy and esmolol plus digoxin combined treatment. Although digoxin did not influence the kinetics of esmolol, the small increase seen in digoxin serum concentration during the combination therapy warrants that caution be exercised during concurrent administration of esmolol and digoxin to patients.