Acute and long-term response to enalapril in congestive failure

Acute effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition versus angiotensin II receptor blockade on cardiac sympathetic activity in patients with heart failure

The beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II (ANG II) receptor antagonists in patients with heart failure secondary to reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are felt to result from prevention of the adverse effects of ANG II on systemic afterload and renal homeostasis. However, ANG II can activate the sympathetic nervous system, and part of the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors and ANG II antagonists may result from their ability to inhibit such activation. We examined the acute effects of the ACE inhibitor captopril (25 mg, n = 9) and the ANG II receptor antagonist losartan (50 mg, n = 10) on hemodynamics as well as total body and cardiac norepinephrine spillover in patients with chronic HFrEF. Hemodynamic and neurochemical measurements were made at baseline and at 1, 2, and 4 h after oral dosing. Administration of both drugs caused significant reductions in systemic arterial, cardiac filling, and pulmonary artery pressures (P < 0.05 vs. baseline). There was no significant difference in the magnitude of those hemodynamic effects. Plasma concentrations of ANG II were significantly decreased by captopril and increased by losartan (P < 0.05 vs. baseline for both). Total body sympathetic activity increased in response to both captopril and losartan (P < 0.05 vs. baseline for both); however, there was no change in cardiac sympathetic activity in response to either drug. The results of the present study do not support the hypothesis that the acute inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system has sympathoinhibitory effects in patients with chronic HFrEF.

Differential effects of fosinopril and enalapril in patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure. Fosinopril in Heart Failure Study Investigators

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of fosinopril in the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF), patients with mild to moderate CHF and left ventricular ejection fractions <40% were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive fosinopril 5 to 20 mg every day (n = 122) or enalapril 5 to 20 mg every day (n = 132) for 1 year.

RESULTS

The event-free survival time was longer (1.6 vs 1.0 months, P= .032) and the total rate of hospitalizations plus deaths was smaller with fosinopril than with enalapril (19.7% vs 25.0%, P= .028). There was consistently better symptom improvement with fosinopril (P< .05). The incidence of orthostatic hypotension was lower in the fosinopril group (1.6% vs 7.6%, P< .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Fosinopril 5 to 20 mg every day was more effective in improving symptoms and delaying events related to worsening of CHF and produced less orthostatic hypotension than enalapril 5 to 20 mg every day.

Comparison of treatment with lisinopril versus enalapril for congestive heart failure

The effect of lisinopril 5-20 mg once daily or enalapril 5-20 mg once daily on exercise capacity, ventricular ectopic activity, and signs and symptoms of heart failure have been studied in 278 patients with mild-to-moderate (New York Heart Association [NYHA] classes II and III) heart failure in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of 12 weeks' duration. Exercise duration was significantly increased by both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment compared with their respective baseline values. There was a trend toward a greater increase in exercise duration on lisinopril after 12 weeks, although this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0748). There were no significant treatment differences with respect to the effect of the 2 drugs on ventricular ectopic counts, couplets, or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Both drugs were equally effective in improving NYHA grading and symptoms. Neither treatment had any significant effect on mean heart rate or mean blood pressures. Both treatments were equally well tolerated. The most commonly reported adverse events on both drugs were cough, dizziness, fall in blood pressure, vertigo, and myocardial infarction. The results of this study indicate that lisinopril 5-20 mg once daily is at least as effective and well tolerated as enalapril 5-20 mg once daily.

Low-dose enalapril in severe chronic heart failure

In a 3-month prospective, single-blind, controlled trial, 38 patients in New York Heart Association functional class III-IV were assigned to group E (n = 19): enalapril 5 mg/day in addition to the previous therapy with digitalis and diuretics, or group C (n = 19): continuation of the previous therapy. In group E, 79% of the patients improved by at least one NYHA functional class after 3 months. In group C, the functional class did not change and four patients died. The echocardiographically determined end-diastolic diameter of the left ventricle decreased in group E from 72 +/- 8 mm to 63 +/- 6 mm (p less than 0.001), and the scintigraphically determined ejection fraction of the left ventricle increased from 33 +/- 18% to 40 +/- 19% (p less than 0.002). In contrast, no significant change was found in group C. Plasma-renin activity increased in group E from 8.2 +/- 1.8 ng/ml h to 29.7 +/- 14 ng/ml h (p less than 0.001), and plasma aldosterone decreased from 47.7 +/- 7.6 ng/dl to 19.9 +/- 4.8 ng/dl (p less than 0.01). In group C no significant change occurred. Comparing the actual changes (deltas) of the NYHA functional class (p less than 0.02), end-diastolic diameter and ejection fraction of the left ventricle, plasma-renin activity, and plasma aldosterone (p less than 0.0001), a significant difference between the two groups was found. Thus, low-dose enalapril resulted in a significant improvement of the NYHA functional class in patients with severe chronic heart failure, accompanied by an improvement in left ventricular function and a decrease in secondary aldosteronism.

Acute effects of the new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril on hemodynamics and carotid sinus baroreflex activity in congestive heart failure

The hemodynamic effects of a single dose of 5 mg of ramipril, a new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, were investigated in 10 patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Arterial blood pressure and total peripheral resistance were decreased by approximately 12% without causing reflex tachycardia. A highly significant decrease occurred in mean pulmonary artery and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures. These hemodynamic changes were equally pronounced at rest and during exercise on a bicycle ergometer; the effect was of the same magnitude 5 and 24 hours after medication. Angiotensin converting enzyme activity in plasma was nearly completely inhibited after 5 hours and remained at about 12% of control after 24 hours. Cardiac index, which was normal before treatment, remained unaffected. Thus, ramipril induced a balanced reduction of left ventricular pre- and afterload. The activity of the carotid sinus baroreflex was investigated in 8 of the patients using the neck suction technique before and 24 hours after ramipril. The reflex bradycardia during stimulation of the baroreceptors was significantly increased by ramipril, whereas the decrease in blood pressure remained essentially unaffected. Ramipril induced a selective sensitization of the parasympathetic baroreceptor heart rate reflex without influencing the sympathetically mediated peripheral vasodilatation. This effect may be responsible for the lack of reflex tachycardia in spite of the decrease in blood pressure.

Comparison of captopril and enalapril in patients with severe chronic heart failure

To evaluate the concept that long duration of action is an advantageous property of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of severe heart failure, we randomly assigned 42 patients to therapy with either a short-acting inhibitor (captopril, 150 mg daily) or a long-acting inhibitor (enalapril, 40 mg daily) for one to three months while concomitant therapy with digoxin and diuretics was kept constant. The treatment groups had similar hemodynamic and clinical characteristics at base-line evaluation and similar initial responses to converting-enzyme inhibition. During long-term therapy, captopril and enalapril produced similar decreases in systemic blood pressure, but the hypotensive effects of enalapril were more prolonged and persistent than those of captopril. Consequently, although the patients in both groups improved hemodynamically and clinically during the study, serious symptomatic hypotension (syncope and near syncope) was seen primarily among those treated with enalapril. Sustained hypotension also probably accounted for the decline in creatinine clearance (P less than 0.05) and the notable retention of potassium (P less than 0.05) observed in the patients treated with enalapril but not in those treated with captopril. We conclude that when large, fixed doses of converting-enzyme inhibitors are used in the treatment of patients with severe chronic heart failure, long-acting agents may produce prolonged hypotensive effects that may compromise cerebral and renal function, and thus they may have disadvantages in such cases, as compared with short-acting agents.

Age and the pharmacokinetics of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors enalapril and enalaprilat

The pharmacokinetics of angiotension converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors enalapril (10 mg orally) and its active metabolite, enalaprilat (10 mg intravenously) were studied in nine young healthy volunteers aged 22-30 years and nine sex matched elderly subjects aged 65-73 years. After both drugs, a biexponential curve was fitted to the decline in plasma enalaprilat concentration. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was greater in the elderly for both drugs. Clearance (CL) and clearance/bioavailability (CL/F) were less in the elderly for enalaprilat and enalapril, respectively. There was no difference in F between young (0.62 +/- 0.16) and elderly subjects (0.61 +/- 0.15). Enalaprilat CL and enalapril CL/F were significantly and positively correlated to endogenous creatinine clearance. There was a significant difference in the weight corrected volume of distribution at steady state after enalaprilat between the young and elderly (P less than 0.02). The relationship between plasma enalaprilat concentrations and percentage ACE inhibition, using the Hill equation, showed no difference in the sensitivity to ACE inhibition between the young and the elderly group. The pharmacokinetic differences observed are likely to be related to an age dependent decline in renal function as well as changes in body composition. Kinetic differences partly explain the greater pharmacodynamic response in the elderly.

Enalapril. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension and congestive heart failure

Enalapril maleate is an orally active angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. It lowers peripheral vascular resistance without causing an increase in heart rate. Enalapril 10 to 40 mg/day administered either once or twice daily is effective in lowering blood pressure in all grades of essential and renovascular hypertension, and shows similar efficacy to usual therapeutic dosages of hydrochlorothiazide, beta-blockers (propranolol, atenolol and metoprolol) and captopril. Most patients achieve adequate blood pressure control on enalapril alone or with hydrochlorothiazide. In patients with severe congestive heart failure resistant to conventional therapy, enalapril improves cardiac performance by a reduction in both preload and afterload, and improves clinical status long term. Enalapril appears to be well tolerated, with few serious adverse effects being reported. It does not induce the bradycardia associated with beta-blockers or the adverse effects of diuretics on some laboratory values. In fact, the hypokalaemic effect of hydrochlorothiazide is attenuated by the addition of enalapril. The incidence of the main (but rare) side effects of hypotension in hypovolaemic patients and reduced renal function in certain patients with renovascular hypertension, which are also seen with captopril, might be reduced by careful dosage titration, discontinuation of diuretics, and monitoring of at-risk patients. Thus, enalapril is a particularly worthwhile addition to the antihypertensive armamentarium, as an alternative for treatment of all grades of essential and renovascular hypertension. It also shows promise in the treatment of congestive heart failure.