Food increases the bioavailability of propafenone

Analysis of the interplay of physiological response to food intake and drug properties in food-drug interactions

The effect of food on oral drug absorption is determined by the complex interplay among gut physiological factors and drug properties. The currently used dissolution testing and classification systems (biopharmaceutics classification system, BCS or biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system, BDDCS) do not account for dynamic changes in gastrointestinal physiology caused by food intake. This study aimed to identify key drug properties that influence food effect (FE) using supervised machine learning approaches. The analysis showed that drugs with high logP, dose number, and extraction ratio have a higher probability of positive FE, while drugs with low permeability and high efflux saturation index have a greater likelihood of negative FE. Weakly acidic drugs also showed a greater probability of positive FE, particularly at pKa >4.3. The importance of drug properties in predicting FE was ranked as logP, dose number, extraction ratio, pKa, and permeability. The accuracy of FE prediction using the models was compared with BCS and extended clearance classification system (ECCS). Overall, the likelihood or magnitude of FE depends on physiological changes to food intake such as altered bile acid secretion rate, intestinal metabolism, transport kinetics, and gastric emptying time, which should be considered along with drug properties (e.g., solubility, logP, and ionization) in predicting FE of orally administered drugs.

Effect of CYP2D6 genetic polymorphism on peak propafenone concentration: no significant effect of CYP2D6*10

Aim: The study aims to investigate the clinical implication of nonfunctional poor metabolizer (PM) alleles and intermediate metabolizer (IM) alleles of CYP2D6, including the CYP2D6*10 allele which shows substrate-dependent decrease in enzymatic activity, in antiarrhythmic therapy using propafenone. Materials & methods: We examined serum propafenone concentrations and metabolic ratio, which was expressed as serum concentrations of propafenone to 5-hydroxypropafenone, in 66 Japanese patients with tachyarrhythmias. Results: The peak propafenone concentration and metabolic ratio in CYP2D6 PM allele carriers were higher than those in extensive metabolizer (EM)/EM, EM/IM and IM/IM genotype groups. Conclusion: Results suggest that CYP2D6 PM alleles affect peak propafenone concentration, but the CYP2D6 IM allele CYP2D6*10 has no clinical implication in propafenone dosing.

Effect of CYP2D6 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of propafenone and its two main metabolites

AIM OF THE STUDY

Propafenone (PPF) is an antiarrhythmic drug, metabolized mainly by CYP2D6 to 5-hydroxypropafenone (5OH-PPF) and by CYP3A4 to norpropafenone (NOR-PPF). CYP2D6 shows a high degree of genetic polymorphism which is associated with diminished antiarrhythmic efficacy or cardiac seizures/cardiotoxicity. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the CYP2D6 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of PPF and its two main metabolites. The usefulness of PPF/5OH-PPF ratio for CYP2D6 phenotyping in healthy adults was also evaluated.

METHODS

Twelve healthy volunteers, 3 poor metabolizers (PM), 2 intermediate metabolizers (IM) and seven extensive metabolizers (EM) received an oral dose of PPF. Concentrations of PPF and its metabolites were analyzed in serum samples over 27h.

RESULTS

The PPF/5OH-PPF ratio distinguished EMs from PMs, but not from IMs. In PMs, the mean transit time (MTT) values were almost the same for PPF and NOR-PPF and much higher than those of EMs and IMs. 5OH-PPF was not detected in EMs. Mean MTT values of 5OH-PPF and NOR-PPF in IMs were 5.27- and 1.52-fold higher than those of EMs.

CONCLUSION

A single time point serum PPF-MR approach is a useful tool to identify PMs. CYP2D6 polymorphism significantly affects the pharmacokinetics of PPF and its two metabolites.

A Rapid HPLC Assay for the Simultaneous Determination of Propafenone and Its Major Metabolites in Human Serum

A rapid and specific HPLC method has been developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of propafenone, an antiarrhythmic agent, and its major metabolites in human serum. The sample preparation was a simple deproteinization with a mixture of ZnSO4 and methanol, yielding almost 100% recoveries of three compounds. Separation was developed on a reverse-phase tracer excel C18 column (25 x 0.46 cm i.d., 5 microm), using an acetonitrile-phosphate buffer gradient at a flow rate of 1.7 ml min(-1), and UV detection of 210 nm. The calibration curves were linear (r2 > 0.999) in the concentration range of 10 - 750 ng ml(-1). The lower limit of quantification was 10 ng ml(-1) for all of the compounds studied. The within and between day precisions in the measurement of QC samples at four tested concentrations were in the range of 1.4 - 8.1% and 4.2 - 11.5% RSD, respectively. The developed procedure was applied to assess the pharmacokinetics of propafenone and its major metabolites following administration of a single 300 mg oral dose of propafenone hydrochloride to three healthy male volunteers.

Human variability in polymorphic CYP2D6 metabolism: is the kinetic default uncertainty factor adequate?

Human variability in the kinetics of CYP2D6 substrates has been quantified using a database of compounds metabolised extensively (>60%) by this polymorphic enzyme. Published pharmacokinetic studies (after oral and intravenous dosing) in non-phenotyped healthy adults, and phenotyped extensive (EMs), intermediate or slow-extensive (SEMs) and poor metabolisers (PMs) have been analysed using data for parameters that relate primarily to chronic exposure (metabolic and total clearances, area under the plasma concentration time-curve) and primarily to acute exposure (peak concentration). Similar analyses were performed with the available data for subgroups of the population (age, ethnicity and disease). Interindividual differences in kinetics for markers of oral exposure were large for non-phenotyped individuals and for EMs (coefficients of variation were 67-71% for clearances and 54-63% for C(max)), whereas the intravenous data indicated a lower variability (34-38%). Comparisons between EMs, SEMs and PMs revealed an increase in oral internal dose for SEMs and PMs (ratio compared to EMs=3 and 9-12, respectively) associated with lower variability than that for non-phenotyped individuals (coefficients of variation were 32-38% and 30% for SEMs and PMs, respectively). In relation to the uncertainty factors used for risk assessment, most subgroups would not be covered by the kinetic default of 3.16. CYP2D6-related factors necessary to cover 95-99% of each subpopulation ranged from 2.7 to 4.1 in non-phenotyped healthy adults and EMs to 15-18 in PMs and 22-45 in children. An exponential relationship (R(2)=0.8) was found between the extent of CYP2D6 metabolism and the uncertainty factors. The extent of CYP2D6 involvement in the metabolism of a substrate is critical in the estimation of the CYP2D6-related factor. The 3.16 kinetic default factor would cover PMs for substrates for which CYP2D6 was responsible for up to 25% of the metabolism in EMs.

Impact of stereoselectivity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antiarrhythmic drugs

Many antiarrhythmic drugs introduced into the market during the past three decades have a chiral centre in their structure and are marketed as racemates. Most of these agents, including disopyramide, encainide, flecainide, mexiletine, propafenone and tocainide, belong to class I antiarrhythmics, whereas verapamil is a class IV antiarrhythmic agent. Except for encainide and flecainide, there is substantial stereoselectivity in one or more of the pharmacological actions of chiral antiarrhythmics, with the activity of enantiomers differing by as much as 100-fold or more for some of these drugs. The absorption of chiral antiarrhythmics appears to be nonstereoselective. However, their distribution, metabolism and renal excretion usually favour one enantiomer versus the other. In terms of distribution, plasma protein binding is stereoselective for most of these drugs, resulting in up to two-fold differences between the enantiomers in their unbound fractions in plasma and volume of distribution. For disopyramide, stereoselective plasma protein binding is further complicated by nonlinearity in the binding at therapeutic concentrations. Hepatic metabolism plays a significant role in the elimination of these antiarrhythmics, accounting for >90% of the elimination of mexiletine, propafenone and verapamil. Additionally, in most cases, significant stereoselectivity is observed in different pathways of metabolism of these drugs. For some drugs, such as propafenone and verapamil, the stereoselectivity in metabolism is further complicated by nonlinearity in one or more of the metabolic pathways. Further, the metabolism of a number of chiral antiarrhythmics, such as mexiletine, propafenone, encainide and flecainide, cosegregates with debrisoquine/sparteine hydroxylation phenotype. Therefore, it is not surprising that a wide interindividual variability exists in the metabolism of these drugs. Excretion of the unchanged enantiomers in urine is an important pathway for the elimination of disopyramide, flecainide and tocainide. The renal clearances of both disopyramide and flecainide exceed the filtration rate for these drugs, suggesting the involvement of active tubular secretion. However, the stereoselectivity in the renal clearance of these drugs, if any, is minimal. Similarly, there is no stereoselectivity in the renal clearance of tocainide, a drug that undergoes tubular reabsorption in addition to glomerular filtration. Overall, substantial stereoselectivity has been observed in both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of chiral antiarrhythmic agents. Because the effects of these drugs are related to their plasma concentrations, this information is of special clinical relevance.

Food increases the bioavailability of tolterodine but not effective exposure

The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of food on the pharmacokinetics of tolterodine, its active 5-hydroxymethyl metabolite (5-HM), and exposure to the active moiety (sum of unbound tolterodine + 5-HM) in healthy volunteers. Serum concentrations of tolterodine and 5-HM were measured for up to 12 hours after a single oral dose (2 mg) of tolterodine L-tartrate, administered either on an empty stomach or with a standardized medium-fat breakfast. All 23 subjects completing the study were classified as extensive metabolizers (phenotyped with debrisoquine). Pharmacokinetic data on tolterodine and the active moiety were evaluable for 22 subjects; all completing subjects were evaluable for 5-HM pharmacokinetics. Based on Cmax and AUC(infinity) ratios, relative bioavailability of tolterodine in the presence of food was 1.49 (90% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.71) and 1.53 (1.35-1.72), respectively. The pharmacokinetics of 5-HM and the active moiety were unaffected by food, as were the rates of drug absorption and terminal half-lives of tolterodine and 5-HM. Given that bioequivalence was observed for the active moiety underfed and fasting conditions, the authors concluded that coadministration of tolterodine with food is not expected to have any clinically relevant effects.

Food intake and the presystemic metabolism of single doses of amitriptyline and nortriptyline

The influence of food on presystemic metabolism of single doses of amitriptyline (AMI) and nortriptyline (NT) was examined. In randomised order 25 mg tablets of each drug was given to 9 healthy, female volunteers both in the fasting state and together with a standardised breakfast. Concentrations of the drugs and of their dealkylated, hydroxylated and conjugated metabolites were measured by gas chromatography--mass spectrometry (AMI experiment) or high-pressure liquid chromatography (NT experiment). Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Food intake did not consistently or significantly influence the bioavailability of either AMI or NT, nor the demethylation of AMI, nor the hydroxylation or the primary or secondary conjugation of NT. There were large interindividual changes in AUC of AMI after food (+94% to -44%). A significant negative correlation between AUC of AMI but not of NT during fasting conditions and per cent change in AUC after food was found (r = -0.72, P = 0.029). The implication of this (negative) correlation for an individual patient might be to keep the intake of the drug in standardised relation to food to avoid undue heavy changes in drug concentration, which might just occur with a change in time relation between intake of drug and food. From a mechanistic view the results argue against a direct and selective influence of food on the presystemic oxidation and conjugation of weakly basic drugs but does not exclude that food may reduce the presystemic metabolism of some such drugs indirectly, by enhancing their rate of hepatic delivery. Presentation of data from food interaction studies should not be restricted to general descriptions. It seems equally important to present the variability of individual data to allow inspection of the extent and direction of effects. This should be of interest for patient, prescriber as well as the regulatory agency.

Identification and determination of phase I metabolites of propafenone in rat liver perfusate

Propafenone (PF) is a class 1C antiarrhythmic agent. To study the mechanisms of PF interactions with dietary nutrients in isolated, perfused rat livers, metabolites of PF in liver perfusate were identified and an analytical method was developed for these metabolites plus parent drug. Identification of phase I metabolites was performed using HPLC/MS equipped with a Lichrospher RP-18 column and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) with electrospray and atmospheric pressure chemical ionizations. Three major metabolite peaks, whose protonated molecular ions were m/z 358, 358 and 300, were identified as a propafenone derivative hydroxylated in the omega-phenyl ring (omega-OH-PF), 5-hydroxypropafenone (5-OH-PF), and N-despropylpropafenone (N-des-PF). The levels of omega-OH-PF, 5-OH-PF, N-des-PF and PF were determined simultaneously by HPLC with UV detection at 210 nm and a mobile phase of 0.03% triethylamine and 0.05% phosphoric acid in water-acetonitrile-methanol (45:20:35, v/v/v) after extraction with 5 ml diethyl ether at pH 10.0 and evaporation of solvent under nitrogen. The results revealed that omega-OH-PF, which was not found in humans, was the major metabolite of PF in rat liver perfusate, not 5-OH-PF which is the major metabolite in human plasma.

Individual variation in first-pass metabolism

Individual variation in pharmacokinetics has long been recognised. This variability is extremely pronounced in drugs that undergo extensive first-pass metabolism. Drug concentrations obtained from individuals given the same dose could range several-fold, even in young healthy volunteers. In addition to the liver, which is the major organ for drug and xenobiotic metabolism, the gut and the lung can contribute significantly to variability in first-pass metabolism. Unfortunately, the contributions of the latter 2 organs are difficult to quantify because conventional in vivo methods for quantifying first-pass metabolism are not sufficiently specific. Drugs that are mainly eliminated by phase II metabolism (e.g. estrogens and progestogens, morphine, etc.) undergo significant first-pass gut metabolism. This is because the gut is rich in conjugating enzymes. The role of the lung in first-pass metabolism is not clear, although it is quite avid in binding basic drugs such as lidocaine (lignocaine), propranolol, etc. Factors such as age, gender, disease states, enzyme induction and inhibition, genetic polymorphism and food effects have been implicated in causing variability in pharmacokinetics of drugs that undergo extensive first-pass metabolism. Of various factors considered, age and gender make the least evident contributions, whereas genetic polymorphism, enzymatic changes due to induction or inhibition, and the effects of food are major contributors to the variability in first-pass metabolism. These factors can easily cause several-fold variations. Polymorphic disposition of imipramine and propafenone, an increase in verapamil first-pass metabolism by rifampicin (rifampin), and the effects of food on propranolol, metoprolol and propafenone, are typical examples. Unfortunately, the contributions of these factors towards variability are unpredictable and tend to be drug-dependent. A change in steady-state clearance of a drug can sometimes be exacerbated when first-pass metabolism and systemic clearance of a drug are simultaneously altered. Therefore, an understanding of the source of variability is the key to the optimisation of therapy.

The hepatic first-pass metabolism of problematic drugs

The first-pass hepatic metabolism of a number of important therapeutic agents is inconsistent with traditional models that assume that the hepatic extraction ratio of a drug is constant in each individual (independent of the concentration of drug in the hepatic sinusoidal blood and also independent of the history of exposure to the drug). In this review, the authors examine the first-pass metabolism of five "problematic drugs" (propranolol, lidocaine, propafenone, verapamil, and nitroglycerin). Each of these compounds has unique facets to its hepatic clearance and pharmacokinetics as well as striking similarities. Selected aspects of first-pass metabolism are reviewed, and a theory that may explain some of the unusual behavior of the four lipophilic bases (propranolol, lidocaine, propafenone, and verapamil) is presented. Finally, the unusual and variable clearance of nitroglycerin is discussed.

Pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers in the context of in vitro/in vivo correlations

A multitude of in vivo variables can influence systemic drug absorption after intake of an oral formulation. For the measurement of consistent in vivo parameters within and between pharmacokinetic studies it is of primary importance that such variables be recognized. Consequently, as many variables as possible should be eliminated or controlled by proper study designs to prevent (or minimize) their disturbance of in vitro/in vivo correlations. The possible influences of some important variables are elaborated and discussed in this paper. The influences of food can be anticipated and controlled against the background of gastrointestinal physiology with and without food and its interplay with the dosage form. Food, and also posture and exercise, may influence splanchnic-hepatic blood flow which may substantially affect the absorption of drugs with a high first-pass metabolism. The influence of the discussed variables may be modified by the dosage form of a particular drug. Single dose studies are appropriate for studying immediate release formulations and in the development of controlled release formulations. Multiple dose studies are preferred for the formal validation of controlled release formulations.

Propafenone. A reappraisal of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic use in cardiac arrhythmias

Propafenone is an orally active sodium channel blocking agent with beta-adrenoceptor antagonist and weak calcium antagonist activity. The pharmacokinetic profile of propafenone is complex, characterised as typically nonlinear, saturable, stereoselective and dependent on both dose and debrisoquin metaboliser phenotype; individualised dosage titration is required. Both placebo- and drug-controlled studies have confirmed the efficacy of propafenone in the treatment of premature ventricular complexes, ventricular couplets and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; in a large meta-analysis, propafenone together with amiodarone, flecainide and encainide were significantly more effective in the control of ventricular ectopy than other antiarrhythmic agents. However, the use of propafenone in these indications, like that of other antiarrhythmic agents, is likely to be limited to patients with a favourable risk-to-benefit ratio. Propafenone has also demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of malignant ventricular arrhythmias (ventricular fibrillation and sustained ventricular tachycardia); preliminary mortality data obtained with propafenone have been encouraging in this patient group. In addition, propafenone has a favourable noncardiac tolerability profile and beta-adrenoceptor antagonist activity, which may offer advantages in some specific patient groups. The area of research concerning propafenone which has shown the greatest expansion over the past 5 years is in the treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias. Propafenone has marked efficacy in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and has been recommended as a first-line prophylactic agent in those with rapid anterograde conduction. Propafenone is also effective in the conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm, although comparative studies are required to determine advantages over more established agents. Propafenone use has been successfully extended to children with limited data demonstrating consistent efficacy in the control of junctional ectopic tachycardia. As with all antiarrhythmic agents, propafenone has the potential to induce arrhythmias. Comparative studies are required to assess in more detail the cardiac tolerability profile of propafenone against other class Ic agents. In conclusion, propafenone offers a broad spectrum of activity in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, although its use in patients with potentially malignant arrhythmias will remain limited for the present. Due to its unique pharmacodynamic profile, propafenone deserves consideration as an individual agent.

Impact of food on the bioavailability of encainide

The bioavailability of drugs that undergo extensive presystemic hepatic metabolism may be increased by concomitant ingestion with food. The effect of food on the bioavailability of encainide, a class IC antiarrhythmic agent, was evaluated in 14 healthy subjects in this randomized crossover study. The subjects received encainide 35 mg every 8 hours for 7 days and were randomized to receive their test dose of encainide with food or after an overnight fast. Encainide area-under-the-concentration versus time curve (AUCs) were detectable in 3 of 14 subjects after fasting and in 7 of 14 after feeding. Although food increased the mean encainide AUC by more than threefold, this increase did not reach statistical significance because of the large number of subjects with indeterminate encainide AUCs. Food did significantly increase the AUC of O-demethyl-encainide (ODE), but not the AUC of methoxy-O-demethyl-encainide (MODE). Despite the increase in ODE AUC, no significant effect on the surface electrocardiogram 2 hours after dose administration could be detected. Food may increase the bioavailability of encainide and one of its active metabolites (ODE). The clinical relevance of this pharmacodynamic effect warrants further evaluation.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of propafenone

Propafenone is a class 1C antiarrhythmic agent which is administered as a racemate of S(+)- and R(-)-enantiomers. It is well absorbed and is predominantly bound to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein in the plasma. The enantiomers display stereoselective disposition characteristics, the R-enantiomer being cleared more quickly. The hepatic metabolism of propafenone is polymorphic and genetically determined: about 10% of Caucasians have a reduced capacity to hydroxylate the drug. This polymorphic metabolism accounts for the marked interindividual variability in the relationships between dose and concentration, and between concentration and pharmacodynamic effects. During long term administration, the metabolism is saturable in patients with the 'extensive metaboliser' phenotype, leading to accumulation of the parent compound. Propafenone blocks fast inward sodium channels in a frequency-dependent manner, and also has moderate beta-blocking effects. Both the enantiomers and the 5-OH metabolite have a potency to block sodium channels comparable with that of the parent compound. The S-enantiomer is a more potent beta-antagonist than the R-enantiomer. Propafenone typically slows conduction markedly but only modestly prolongs refractoriness. These cardiac effects are determined by the extent of its myocardial accumulation. The drug should be used with caution in patients with serious structural heart disease, as it may cause or aggravate life-threatening arrhythmias. Significant interactions occur when propafenone is coadministered with other drugs. It increases the plasma concentrations of digoxin, warfarin, metoprolol and propranolol as well as enhancing their respective pharmacodynamic effects. Doses of these drugs should therefore be decreased if they are coadministered with propafenone.

Mechanisms and variations in the food effect on propranolol bioavailability

Mechanisms and variations in the food-induced increase in the bioavailability of propranolol were assessed by single-dose (80 mg) studies in healthy volunteers who took the drug on an empty stomach, immediately after a protein-rich breakfast, and together with a carbohydrate-rich, protein-poor breakfast. Concomitant intake of the protein-rich, but not the carbohydrate-rich, protein-poor breakfast, increased the bioavailability of propranolol in most, but not all, subjects. The food (protein) effect displayed much inter-individual variation, from a decrease to a 250% increase, which could be explained, at least in part, by a correlation between the oral clearance of propranolol and the food-induced increase in its bioavailability. The food effect was not associated with decreased total availability, but with delayed appearance, of the oxidative metabolites 4-OHP, NLA and PG. Hence the food (protein) effect does not seem to be caused by enzyme inhibition, but rather it is due to reduced hepatic extraction of propranolol, probably consequent to an increase hepatic entry rate. When taken together with the protein-rich breakfast, propranolol usually appeared in systemic blood at least as early as when taken on an empty stomach, implying that gastric absorption of propranolol may be possible in the presence of protein-rich food. Within the individual the food effect was reproducible, but its magnitude showed an intraindividual variation that may reflect its dependence upon the rates of gastrointestinal absorption and splanchnic-hepatic blood flow, and hence upon the rate of hepatic drug entry.

Genetically-determined interaction between propafenone and low dose quinidine: role of active metabolites in modulating net drug effect

1. Quinidine is a potent inhibitor of the genetically-determined debrisoquine 4-hydroxylation. Oxidation reactions of several other drugs, including the 5-hydroxylation of the new antiarrhythmic drug propafenone, depend on the isozyme responsible for debrisoquine 4-hydroxylation. 2. The effect of quinidine on the debrisoquine phenotype-dependent 5-hydroxylation and the pharmacological activity of propafenone was studied in seven 'extensive' metabolizers and two 'poor' metabolizers of the drug receiving propafenone for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias. 3. In patients with the extensive metabolizer phenotype, quinidine increased mean steady-state plasma propafenone concentrations more than two fold, from 408 +/- 351 (mean +/- s.d.) to 1096 +/- 644 ng ml-1 (P less than 0.001), decreased 5-hydroxypropafenone concentrations from 242 +/- 196 to 125 +/- 97 ng ml-1 (P less than 0.02) and reduced propafenone oral clearance by 58 +/- 23%. 4. Despite these changes in plasma concentrations, electrocardiographic intervals and arrhythmia frequency were unaltered by quinidine coadministration, indicating that 5-hydroxypropafenone contributes to the pharmacologic effects of propafenone therapy in extensive metabolizers. 5. In contrasts, plasma concentrations of propafenone and 5-hydroxypropafenone remained unchanged in the two patients with the poor metabolizer phenotype. 6. Biotransformation of substrates for the debrisoquine pathway can be markedly perturbed by even low doses of quinidine; interindividual variability in drug interactions may have a genetic component.

Effects of coadministration of propafenone on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy volunteer subjects

Previous reports have suggested an interaction between propafenone and digoxin. We investigated the pharmacokinetics of IV digoxin when given alone (Phase I), after pretreatment with propafenone 150 mg every 8 hours for seven days (Phase II), and after propafenone 300 mg every 8 hours for 7 days (Phase III). The total body clearance of digoxin during Phase I was 2.45 ml/min/kg and was 2.17 ml/min/kg during Phase II (NS) and decreased to 1.92 ml/min/kg during Phase III (P less than 0.05). The renal clearance and half-life of digoxin were not significantly altered by propafenone. There was a trend towards a decrease in the volume of distribution of digoxin from 9.43 L/kg in Phase I, to 9.33 L/kg in Phase II, and 8.02 L/kg in Phase III. Similarly there was a trend towards a decreased nonrenal clearance of digoxin from 1.21 ml/min/kg during Phase I to 1.01 ml/min/kg during Phase II and to 0.75 ml/min/kg during Phase III. The changes in volume of distribution and nonrenal clearance parallel each other resulting in no change in the elimination half-life of digoxin. It is postulated that the mechanism of this interaction is due to decreases in the volume of distribution and nonrenal elimination of digoxin by propafenone. The degree of this interaction was related to the dose of propafenone. The magnitude of this interaction may be greater in patients and, thus, may require a reduction in the digoxin dose.

Propafenone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in the treatment of arrhythmias

Propafenone is a Class I antiarrhythmic agent with weak beta-adrenoceptor antagonist activity which can be given both intravenously and orally. Dosage must be individualised because of dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, a wide range of clinically effective plasma concentrations (64 to 3271 micrograms/L) after comparable doses, the presence of an active metabolite (5-hydroxy-propafenone) and genetically determined metabolic oxidation. In non-comparative studies propafenone 450 and 900 mg/day orally significantly suppressed premature ventricular complexes and couplets in 96% and 75% of patients, respectively, and abolished ventricular tachycardia in 75% of patients. Efficacy was confirmed in placebo-controlled studies in which propafenone 300 to 900mg daily suppressed premature ventricular complexes (greater than 80%) in 77% of patients; 87% of patients had significant reductions in couplets and abolition of ventricular tachycardia. In patients with ventricular arrhythmias refractory to other antiarrhythmic agents, propafenone 450 to 1200 mg/day suppressed arrhythmias in 63% of patients (in long term therapy 66%). Electrically induced arrhythmias were prevented by intravenously administered propafenone in 12 to 23% of patients. However, long term oral therapy was effective in 77% of patients selected using programmed electrical stimulation. Propafenone was also effective in suppressing atrial and AV nodal/junctional re-entrant tachycardias and Wolff-Parkinson-White tachycardias involving accessory pathways. A limited number of comparisons with other antiarrhythmic drugs indicate that the antiarrhythmic efficacy of propafenone is superior or similar to that of quinidine, disopyramide and tocainide, and comparable to that of lignocaine (lidocaine), flecainide and metoprolol against ventricular arrhythmias and a smaller number of atrial arrhythmias. Cardiovascular side effects indicate a proarrhythmic effect similar to that with other Class I drugs, occasional precipitation of congestive heart failure and conduction abnormalities; the latter two occur more often in patients with underlying ventricular dysfunction. Non-cardiovascular side effects (neurological, gastrointestinal) are well tolerated and generally resolve with continued therapy or dosage reduction. Thus, propafenone is an effective antiarrhythmic agent, and is a useful addition to currently available drugs, although further studies will be required to determine clearly its place in therapy compared with more established antiarrhythmic drugs.

Plasma and saliva propafenone concentrations at steady state

Twenty-four healthy male subjects were administered 300 mg of propafenone every 8 h for 6 d in each of two phases that were separated by 2 d. Plasma samples were collected during the approach to steady state for each phase, and plasma and saliva samples were collected frequently at steady state. Both plasma and saliva propafenone were assayed by a specific HPLC method. Two estimates of elimination half-life (t1/2), mean steady-state concentration (CPss), time to maximal concentration (tmax), and maximal concentration (CPmax) were estimated for each subject. Also mean steady-state saliva concentrations (CSss), time to maximal saliva concentration (tSmax), and maximal saliva concentrations (CSmax) were estimated. A large intersubject variance in both t1/2 and CPss were observed in the 24 subjects, with the t1/2 values ranging from 2.1 to 27.2 h and the CPss values from 0.3 to 3.03 microgram/mL. Each subject was quite consistent for the two phases, suggesting a relatively low intrasubject variance for propafenone kinetics. A histogram shows most subjects to have t1/2 values between 2 and 10 h, with diminishing numbers of subjects at greater t1/2 values rather than a bimodal distribution. Saliva concentrations ranged from 12 to 72% of the corresponding plasma concentrations, being 24.7 +/- 11.1% of the simultaneously collected plasma sample overall (mean +/- SD). a significant (p less than 0.001) positive correlation exists between CPss and CSss.