Evolution of diuretics and ACE inhibitors, their renal and antihypertensive actions--parallels and contrasts

Are diuretics harmful in the management of acute kidney injury?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To assess the role of diuretics in acute kidney injury (AKI) and their effectiveness in preventing AKI, achieving fluid balance, and decreasing progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Diuretics are associated with increased risk for AKI. The theoretical advantage of diuretic-induced preservation of renal medullary oxygenation to prevent AKI has not been proven. A higher cumulative diuretic dose during the dialysis period can cause hypotension and increase mortality in a dose-dependent manner. Data on the use of forced euvolemic diuresis to prevent AKI remains controversial. Positive fluid balance has emerged as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes. Post-AKI furosemide dose had a favorable effect on mortality due in part to the reduction of positive fluid balance. There are exciting experimental data suggesting that spironolactone may prevent AKI once an ischemic insult has occurred and thus prevent the progression to CKD.

SUMMARY

Diuretics are ineffective and even detrimental in the prevention and treatment of AKI, and neither shorten the duration of AKI, nor reduce the need for renal replacement therapy. Diuretics have an important role in volume management in AKI, but they are not recommended for the prevention of AKI. There is increased emphasis on the prevention of progression of AKI to CKD.

Treating stage 2 hypertension

The prevalence of hypertension increases with advancing age, due primarily to increases in systolic blood pressure. Systolic hypertension is the most common form of hypertension in individuals over 50 years of age and reflects pathologic decreases in arterial compliance. Systolic blood pressure elevation is a more important risk factor for cardiovascular disease than is diastolic blood pressure elevation. Stage 2 hypertension, defined as blood pressure > or =160/100 mm Hg, is often found in older persons, who are at highest risk for cardiovascular events. In this clinical review, hypertension experts utilize a case study to provide a paradigm for treating older patients with stage 2 hypertension.

Diuretics and the treatment of systemic hypertension

Diuretics are still among the most frequently used antihypertensive drugs in the treatment of hypertension. Their pharmacologic and hemodynamic properties are based on the water and salt metabolism in the pathophysiology of high blood pressure. Initially, there is a reduction of plasma and extracellular fluid volume; cardiac output also decreases. After this early phase, cardiac output returns to normal with an accompanying decrease in peripheral resistance so as to correct the underlying hemodynamic fault of the hypertensive state. Diuretics have a high therapeutic efficacy either as monotherapy or in combination with beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or calcium antagonists. The main problem with the use of diuretics is related to their metabolic side effects, which are dose-related. Currently, there is a tendency to administer low-dose diuretics, which result in fewer clinical and metabolic side effects, but with a continued antihypertensive efficacy. Therefore, low doses of diuretics can be recommended as initial therapy in the stepped-care approach of hypertension.

Passive and carrier-mediated intestinal absorption components of two angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor prodrugs in rats: enalapril and fosinopril

The intestinal absorption mechanism of two ACE inhibitor prodrugs, enalapril and fosinopril, was investigated in rats using a single-pass perfusion method. A modified boundary layer solution was applied to determine the apparent intestinal wall permeability. The prodrug enalapril is well absorbed from rat jejunum, whereas the parent drug, enalaprilat, is poorly absorbed. The permeability of enalapril is concentration dependent and is decreased by the dipeptide Tyr-Gly and by cephradine but not by the amino acids L-leucine or L-phenylalanine, indicating a nonpassive absorption mechanism via the small peptide carrier-mediated transport system. In contrast, fosinopril is readily absorbed by a concentration-independent mechanism without the involvement of the peptide carrier.

Effect of salt balance on the renal and hemodynamic actions of benazepril in normal men

Renal and hemodynamic effects of diet alone and of single oral doses of the nonsulphydryl angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, benazepril (10 mg), were investigated in eight healthy volunteers under stable conditions of high salt intake (300 mmol NaCl/day) and low salt intake (10 mmol NaCl/day), in a double blind, placebo controlled study. There were no changes in blood pressure between the two dietary extremes either during the run-in period or once sodium balance had been achieved. Mean renal plasma flow was higher, by approximately 10% and renal vascular resistance lower by 15%, on high salt diet compared to low salt diet. Glomerular filtration rates were found to be similar irrespective of the state of salt balance. Both plasma urate concentration and plasma renin activity were significantly elevated in the low salt compared to high salt state. Benazepril caused a greater fall in blood pressure in the sodium depleted state. Significant increases in the mean renal plasma flow, in the order of 15-20%, were seen over 6 h postbenazepril when compared with placebo response, regardless of the level of salt intake. Glomerular filtration rate over the same period remained unaltered. Benazepril doubled the urinary excretion of sodium over the first 4 hours after dosing whilst on the low salt diet; the equivalent increase during salt loading was approximately 20%. These results suggest that benazepril may exert direct effects on renal tubular function additional to those achieved through ACE blockade.

Antihypertensive effects of nitrendipine and cilazapril alone, and in combination in hypertensive patients with chronic renal failure

1. It has been reported that calcium antagonists lower blood pressure more effectively in salt replete hypertensive patients with a low plasma renin activity (PRA), whereas angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are more effective in salt depleted patients with a high level of PRA. An inverse relationship between the antihypertensive effects of these two groups of drugs might therefore be expected. 2. Since salt retention and inappropriately high levels of PRA are said to contribute to hypertension in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), an additive antihypertensive effect with both drugs might also be expected in such patients. 3. To test these hypotheses, we investigated the acute and chronic antihypertensive effects of the calcium antagonist nitrendipine and the new ACE inhibitor cilazapril, given alone, and in combination, in a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study of 11 hypertensive patients with chronic renal failure who had a mean pretreatment blood pressure of 149 +/- 3/96 +/- 2 mm Hg. Patients received nitrendipine 10 mg, cilazapril 1.25 or 2.5 mg depending on creatinine clearance, or placebo once daily orally. Nitrendipine and cilazapril were also combined at the same doses. 4. Nitrendipine and cilazapril were equally effective, with a maximal acute reduction of mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 5.3 +/- 1.8% and 8.0 +/- 1.9%, and after 1 week of treatment 5.0 +/- 2.4% and 8.1 +/- 1.8%, respectively. In individual patients no inverse relationship between the blood pressure responses to the two drugs was found.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive Africans

The antihypertensive efficacy both of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and thiazide diuretics has been claimed to be influenced by plasma renin activity, which declines with age and is low in blacks. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group preliminary study, the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the ACE inhibitor enalapril (20 mg day-1) and hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg day-1) were evaluated and compared for 4 weeks in 20 African patients with essential hypertension. The two groups had similar baseline clinical features and serum Na+ and K+ levels. Hydrochlorothiazide caused a significant and sustained fall in erect blood pressure with a reflex tachycardia. Enalapril exerted only a modest antihypertensive action, but significantly reduced erect heart rate. Direct comparison of hydrochlorothiazide- and enalapril-induced hypotension suggested a greater fall in subjects on the thiazide. The 95% confidence limits for the thiazide-enalapril difference in antihypertensive action at the end of the study was 39.5 to -7.5 mm Hg systolic and 22.0 to -6.6 mm Hg diastolic. The maximal blood pressure fall after hydrochlorothiazide was positively correlated with age (r = 0.50; p less than 0.05), whilst that of enalapril was inversely related age to (r = -0.57, p less than 0.05). The results are compatible with the notion that ACE inhibitor monotherapy may be less effective than thiazide diuretic treatment in African and black patients with essential hypertension. The findings also support the concept that age and racial factors may influence the response to antihypertensive treatment.