Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic study of propranolol in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension

Exploring mutation specific beta blocker pharmacology of the pathogenic late sodium channel current from patient-specific pluripotent stem cell myocytes derived from long QT syndrome mutation carriers

The congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS), one of the most common cardiac channelopathies, is characterized by delayed ventricular repolarization underlying prolongation of the QT interval of the surface electrocardiogram. LQTS is caused by mutations in genes coding for cardiac ion channels or ion channel-associated proteins. The major therapeutic approach to LQTS management is beta blocker therapy which has been shown to be effective in treatment of LQTS variants caused by mutations in K⁺ channels. However, this approach has been questioned in the treatment of patients identified as LQTS variant 3(LQT3) patients who carry mutations in SCN5A, the gene coding for the principal cardiac Na⁺ channel. LQT3 mutations are gain of function mutations that disrupt spontaneous Na⁺ channel inactivation and promote persistent or late Na⁺ channel current (I_NaL) that delays repolarization and underlies QT prolongation. Clinical investigation of patients with the two most common LQT3 mutations, the ΔKPQ and the E1784K mutations, found beta blocker treatment a useful therapeutic approach for managing arrhythmias in this patient population. However, there is little experimental data that reveals the mechanisms underlying these antiarrhythmic actions. Here, we have investigated the effects of the beta blocker propranolol on I_NaL expressed by ΔKPQ and E1784K channels in induced pluripotent stem cells derived from patients carrying these mutations. Our results indicate that propranolol preferentially inhibits I_NaL expressed by these channels suggesting that the protective effects of propranolol in treating LQT3 patients is due in part to modulation of I_NaL.

Primary prevention of variceal bleeding in people with oesophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Approximately 40% to 95% of people with cirrhosis have oesophageal varices. About 15% to 20% of oesophageal varices bleed in about one to three years. There are several different treatments to prevent bleeding, including: beta-blockers, endoscopic sclerotherapy, and variceal band ligation. However, there is uncertainty surrounding their individual and relative benefits and harms.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the benefits and harms of different treatments for prevention of first variceal bleeding from oesophageal varices in adults with liver cirrhosis through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the different treatments for prevention of first variceal bleeding from oesophageal varices according to their safety and efficacy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trials registers to December 2019 to identify randomised clinical trials in people with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or status) in adults with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding. We excluded randomised clinical trials in which participants had previous bleeding from oesophageal varices and those who had previously undergone liver transplantation or previously received prophylactic treatment for oesophageal varices.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the differences in treatments using hazard ratios (HR), odds ratios (OR), and rate ratios with 95% credible intervals (CrI) based on an available-case analysis, according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance. We performed the direct comparisons from randomised clinical trials using the same codes and the same technical details.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 66 randomised clinical trials (6653 participants) in the review. Sixty trials (6212 participants) provided data for one or more comparisons in the review. The trials that provided the information included people with cirrhosis due to varied aetiologies and those at high risk of bleeding from oesophageal varices. The follow-up in the trials that reported outcomes ranged from 6 months to 60 months. All but one of the trials were at high risk of bias. The interventions compared included beta-blockers, no active intervention, variceal band ligation, sclerotherapy, beta-blockers plus variceal band ligation, beta-blockers plus nitrates, nitrates, beta-blockers plus sclerotherapy, and portocaval shunt. Overall, 21.2% of participants who received non-selective beta-blockers ('beta-blockers') - the reference treatment (chosen because this was the most common treatment compared in the trials) - died during 8-month to 60-month follow-up. Based on low-certainty evidence, beta-blockers, variceal band ligation, sclerotherapy, and beta-blockers plus nitrates all had lower mortality versus no active intervention (beta-blockers: HR 0.49, 95% CrI 0.36 to 0.67; direct comparison HR: 0.59, 95% CrI 0.42 to 0.83; 10 trials, 1200 participants; variceal band ligation: HR 0.51, 95% CrI 0.35 to 0.74; direct comparison HR 0.49, 95% CrI 0.12 to 2.14; 3 trials, 355 participants; sclerotherapy: HR 0.66, 95% CrI 0.51 to 0.85; direct comparison HR 0.61, 95% CrI 0.41 to 0.90; 18 trials, 1666 participants; beta-blockers plus nitrates: HR 0.41, 95% CrI 0.20 to 0.85; no direct comparison). No trials reported health-related quality of life. Based on low-certainty evidence, variceal band ligation had a higher number of serious adverse events (number of events) than beta-blockers (rate ratio 10.49, 95% CrI 2.83 to 60.64; 1 trial, 168 participants). Based on low-certainty evidence, beta-blockers plus nitrates had a higher number of 'any adverse events (number of participants)' than beta-blockers alone (OR 3.41, 95% CrI 1.11 to 11.28; 1 trial, 57 participants). Based on low-certainty evidence, adverse events (number of events) were higher in sclerotherapy than in beta-blockers (rate ratio 2.49, 95% CrI 1.53 to 4.22; direct comparison rate ratio 2.47, 95% CrI 1.27 to 5.06; 2 trials, 90 participants), and in beta-blockers plus variceal band ligation than in beta-blockers (direct comparison rate ratio 1.72, 95% CrI 1.08 to 2.76; 1 trial, 140 participants). Based on low-certainty evidence, any variceal bleed was lower in beta-blockers plus variceal band ligation than in beta-blockers (direct comparison HR 0.21, 95% CrI 0.04 to 0.71; 1 trial, 173 participants). Based on low-certainty evidence, any variceal bleed was higher in nitrates than beta-blockers (direct comparison HR 6.40, 95% CrI 1.58 to 47.42; 1 trial, 52 participants). The evidence indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of the interventions in the remaining comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on low-certainty evidence, beta-blockers, variceal band ligation, sclerotherapy, and beta-blockers plus nitrates may decrease mortality compared to no intervention in people with high-risk oesophageal varices in people with cirrhosis and no previous history of bleeding. Based on low-certainty evidence, variceal band ligation may result in a higher number of serious adverse events than beta-blockers. The evidence indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of beta-blockers versus variceal band ligation on variceal bleeding. The evidence also indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of the interventions in most of the remaining comparisons.

Development and Evaluation of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Drug-Disease Model of Propranolol for Suggesting Model Informed Dosing in Liver Cirrhosis Patients

AIM

The study was aimed to understand the underlying causes for the differences in propranolol pharmacokinetics (PK) between healthy and cirrhosis populations by using a systematic whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model-building approach for suggesting model informed propranolol dosing in liver cirrhosis patients with different stages of disease severity.

METHODS

A whole-body PBPK model was developed by using population simulator PK-Sim® by using reported physicochemical and clinical data for propranolol in healthy and liver cirrhosis populations. The model evaluation was done by visual verification and comparison of PK parameters using their observed/predicted ratios (Robs/pred).

RESULTS

The developed model has effectively described the disposition of propranolol after intravenous and oral application in healthy and liver cirrhosis populations. All the model predictions were comparable to the observed clinical data and the Robs/pred for all the PK parameters were within a 2-fold range. A significant increase in plasma concentration of propranolol and decrease in drug clearance was observed in progressive stages of liver cirrhosis. The developed model after evaluation with the reported clinical PK data was used for suggesting model informed propranolol dosing in different stages of liver cirrhosis based on systemic unbound drug concentration.

CONCLUSION

The developed PBPK model has successfully described propranolol PK in healthy and cirrhosis populations after IV and oral administration. The evaluated PBPK propranolol-cirrhosis model can have many implications in predicting propranolol dosing in liver cirrhosis patients with different stages of disease severity.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Propranolol Hydrochloride: A Review

BACKGROUND

Nobel laureate Sir James Black's molecule, propranolol, still has broad potential in cardiovascular diseases, infantile haemangiomas and anxiety. A comprehensive and systematic review of the literature for the summarization of pharmacokinetic parameters would be effective to explore the new safe uses of propranolol in different scenarios, without exposing humans and using virtual-human modeling approaches.

OBJECTIVE

This review encompasses physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interaction data of propranolol collected from various studies.

METHODS

Clinical pharmacokinetic studies on propranolol were screened using Medline and Google Scholar databases. Eighty-three clinical trials, in which pharmacokinetic profiles and plasma time concentration were available after oral or IV administration, were included in the review.

RESULTS

The study depicts that propranolol is well absorbed after oral administration. It has dose-dependent bioavailability, and a 2-fold increase in dose results in a 2.5-fold increase in the area under the curve, a 1.3-fold increase in the time to reach maximum plasma concentration and finally, 2.2 and 1.8-fold increase in maximum plasma concentration in both immediate and long-acting formulations, respectively. Propranolol is a substrate of CYP2D6, CYP1A2 and CYP2C19, retaining potential pharmacokinetic interactions with co-administered drugs. Age, gender, race and ethnicity do not alter its pharmacokinetics. However, in renal and hepatic impairment, it needs a dose adjustment.

CONCLUSION

Physiochemical and pooled pharmacokinetic parameters of propranolol are beneficial to establish physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling among the diseased population.

Non-selective beta-blockers increase overall and liver mortality in alcoholic cirrhosis with MELD ≥ 12 over 5 years of follow-up

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Non-cardioselective beta-blocker (NSBB) effects on mortality in cirrhosis are controversial. We evaluated the impact of NSBBs on mortality according to liver severity and mortality cause.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-eight patients with alcoholic cirrhosis were included in a retroprospective cohort: 129 NSBB-treated and 129 controls. The NSBB group had the following significant baseline differences: higher MELD, more frequent previous gastrointestinal bleeding, large oesophageal varices (OV) and lower heart rate. Propranolol dose was 160 mg/d in 81% of NSBB patients.

RESULTS

(i) Liver function: during 5.3 ± 2.6 years of follow-up, MELD progression was higher in NSBB patients: 1 (-1-4) than in controls: 0 (-1-1) (P = .017). (ii) Overall survival: no significant differences were observed between NSBBs and controls (Kaplan-Meier curves: P = .291). In multivariate Cox analysis, baseline MELD interacted with NSBB (P = .011). Thus, the NSBB hazard ratio (HR) was 0.99 (0.50-1.98) in MELD < 12 vs 3.17 (1.19-8.42) in MELD ≥ 12. (iii) Liver survival: NSBB decreased liver survival (Kaplan-Meier: P = .031). In multivariate Cox analysis, baseline MELD interacted with NSBB (P < .001). The NSBB HR was 0.81 (0.30-2.19) in MELD < 12 vs 6.23 (1.94-20.0) in MELD ≥ 12. In competing risk multivariate analysis for liver mortality, the MELD-NSBB interaction was significant (P < .001): the NSBB HR was 1.02 (0.36-2.91) in MELD < 12 vs 9.24 (3.18-26.9) in MELD ≥ 12. 4) Non-liver survival: contrastingly, non-liver survival was increased by NSBBs, especially in MELD ≥ 12 (competing Kaplan-Meier: P = .044). These results were confirmed in propensity risk score (PRS)-matched patients.

CONCLUSION

In alcoholic cirrhosis with rather high propranolol doses, overall and liver survival are significantly aggravated when MELD is ≥12.

Impact of cardiac function, refractory ascites and beta blockers on the outcome of patients with cirrhosis listed for liver transplantation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Whether non-selective beta blockers (NSBBs) are deleterious in patients with end-stage cirrhosis and refractory ascites has been widely debated. We hypothesized that only the subset of patients on the liver transplant waiting list who had impaired cardiac performance would be at increased risk of mortality if receiving NSBBs.

METHODS

This study included 584 consecutive patients with cirrhosis evaluated for transplantation between 1999 and 2014. All patients had right heart catheterization with hemodynamic measurements at evaluation. Fifty percent received NSBBs. Refractory ascites was present in 33%. Cardiac performance was assessed by left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI). Waiting list mortality without liver transplantation was explored using competing risk analysis.

RESULTS

LVSWI was significantly lower in patients with refractory ascites. In multivariate analysis using competing risk, refractory ascites, NSBBs and LVSWI were associated with waiting list mortality in the whole population, with a statistically significant interaction between NSBBs and LVSWI. The most discriminant value of LVSWI was 64.1 g-m/m². In the final model, refractory ascites (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.52; 95% CI1.01-2.28; p = 0.0083) and treatment by NSBBs with LVSWI <64.1 g-m/m² (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.96; 95% CI 1.32-2.90; p = 0.0009) were significantly associated with waiting list mortality, taking into account serum sodium and the model for end-stage liver disease score.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that compromised cardiac performance is more common in patients with refractory ascites and that NSBBs are deleterious in cirrhotic patients with compromised cardiac performance. These results highlight the prognostic value of cardiac function in patients with end-stage cirrhosis.

LAY SUMMARY

There are still controversies concerning the impact of non-selective beta blockers on outcomes in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, especially in those with refractory ascites. In this study of 584 cirrhotic patients evaluated for liver transplantation, who underwent right heart catheterization, we have shown that global cardiac performance measured by left ventricular stroke work index is lower in patients with refractory ascites. Administration of non-selective beta blockers in patients with compromised cardiac performance may increase waiting list mortality. These results highlight the prognostic value of global cardiac performance in patients with end-stage cirrhosis.

Lack of clinical or haemodynamic rebound after abrupt interruption of beta-blockers in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers may have to be interrupted in patients with cirrhosis. The concept of a rebound after interruption of beta-blockers is based on an animal study and on isolated case reports of variceal bleeding.

AIM

To determine if a rebound occurs in patients with cirrhosis following abrupt interruption of beta-blockers.

METHODS

We prospectively included all consecutive patients with cirrhosis undergoing right heart and hepatic vein catheterisation. Four groups were defined: 'no beta-blockers' including patients not receiving beta-blockers; '≤1 day', '2-3 days' and '≥4 days' classified according to the time patients had interrupted beta-blockers before catheterisation. Results were expressed as median (interquartile range).

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients were included. Among the 25 patients in the groups '2-3 days' and '≥4 days', median duration of beta-blockers interruption was 4 (3-6) days. No gastrointestinal bleeding occurred during that period, nor during the following month. Hepatic venous pressure gradient was not different among patients in usually treated with beta-blockers. After adjustment, beta-blockers interruption was not associated with hepatic venous pressure gradient. Cardiac index was higher in the '≥4 days' group [4.6 L/min/m(2) (3.5-5.1)] than in the '≤1 day' group [3.4 (2.6-4.0); P = 0.001] or in the '2-3 days' group [3.1 (2.7-3.7); P = 0.007], but not different from the 'no beta-blockers' group.

CONCLUSIONS

Abrupt interruption of beta-blockers is associated neither with an apparent increase in the risk of variceal bleeding nor with a haemodynamic rebound. Thus, interruption of beta-blockers in patients with cirrhosis may not require particular dosing or surveillance.

[Progress in portal hypertension]

In patients with portal hypertension due to cirrhosis, the mechanisms responsible for circulatory modifications are well-known. An elevation in intrahepatic vascular resistance related to a hepatic endothelin hyperproduction and an arterial nitric oxide (NO) hyperproduction. The presence and the degree of portal hypertension might be determined by the measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient but non-invasive technique as FibroTest or FibroScan might be useful to estimate the presence of severe portal hypertension. Numerous substances decrease portal pressure either by reducing hepatic vascular resistance or by reducing portal tributary blood flow. The combination of both types of substances is probably the best pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension but further hemodynamic and clinical studies are needed.

Current management of the complications of portal hypertension: variceal bleeding and ascites

Portal hypertension is one of the main consequences of cirrhosis. It results from a combination of increased intrahepatic vascular resistance and increased blood flow through the portal venous system. The condition leads to the formation of portosystemic collateral veins. Esophagogastric varices have the greatest clinical impact, with a risk of bleeding as high as 30% within 2 years of medium or large varices developing. Ascites, another important complication of advanced cirrhosis and severe portal hypertension, is sometimes refractory to treatment and is complicated by spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatorenal syndrome. We describe the pathophysiology of portal hypertension and the current management of its complications, with emphasis on the prophylaxis and treatment of variceal bleeding and ascites.

[Non-invasive diagnosis of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. Application to the primary prevention of varices]

One of the major complications of cirrhosis is the occurrence of portal hypertension and esophageal varices. At present, universal endoscopic screening of esophageal varices is recommended in association to primary prophylaxis in patients at high risk of variceal bleeding. But this screening is invasive and could be not cost-effective. Besides, pre-primary phrophylaxis is not effective and hampared by side effects. So, non invasive diagnosis of portal hypertension might be useful. This one could depend on non invasive measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient, but its application to screening is not well-documented and its use in treatment monitoring is debated. A second way could be non invasive diagnosis of large esophageal varices because of prognostic and economic issues. Indirect echographic markers of portal hypertension and esophageal varices (ascites, portal vein diameter > or = 13 mm, spleen length, maximal and mean velocimetry of portal vein flow, respectively < 20 cm/s and < 12 cm/s) could be useful. Among this parameters, spleen length is an independent predictive marker of esophageal varices. Besides, several direct or indirect blood markers of fibrosis have been tested. Platelet count is repeatedly a predictive marker of esophageal varices in multivariate analysis. The other predictive factors of esophageal varices could be: prothrombin time, splenomegaly, spider naevi, Child-Pugh class, bilirubinemia, platelet count/spleen diameter ratio and Fibrotest, but these data require validation. In summary, in regard to actual results, non invasive diagnosis of portal hypertension might be useful in esophageal varices screening, but the substitutes to endoscopy have limited place actually in clinical practice, and exclusive non invasive diagnosis of portal hypertension is not applicable; the only test that seems to be useful in clinical practice is conventional endoscopy awaiting the results of videocapsule.

Effect of lipophilicity on in vivo iontophoretic delivery. II. Beta-blockers

The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between drug lipophilicity and the transdermal absorption processes in the iontophoretic delivery in vivo. Anodal iontophoresis of beta-blockers as model drugs having different lipophilicity (atenolol, pindolol, metoprolol, acebutolol, oxprenolol and propranolol) was performed with rats (electrical current, 0.625 mA/cm2; application period, 90 min), and the drug concentrations in skin, cutaneous vein and systemic vein were determined. Increasing the lipophilicity of beta-blockers caused a greater absorption into the skin. Exceptionally, it was found that pindolol had high skin absorption, irrespective of its hydrophilic nature. Further, the drug transfer rate from skin to cutaneous vein (R(SC)) was evaluated from the arterio-venous plasma concentration difference of drug in the skin. Normalized R(SC) by skin concentration showed a negative correlation with the logarithm of n-octanol/buffer partition coefficient (Log P, pH 7.4), suggesting the partitioning between stratum corneum and viable epidermis was a primary process to determine the transfer properties of beta-blockers to local blood circulation. Pindolol exhibited both high skin absorption and high transfer from skin to cutaneous vein. These characteristics of pindolol could be explained by the chemical structure, molecular size and hydrophilicity. These findings for pindolol should be valuable for the optimal design of drug candidates for iontophoretic transdermal delivery.

Daily variation of azygos and portal blood flow and the effect of propranolol administration once an evening in cirrhotics

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Esophageal variceal bleeding occur more often at night, however, the mechanism for this remains unclear. This study investigated the daily variation of azygos blood flow (AzBF) and portal blood flow (PBF) and the effects of propranolol administration given once in evening in cirrhotics.

METHODS

Blood flow were measured using magnetic resonance imaging. Hemodynamic parameters were determined at 08:00, 16:00 24:00 and again 08:00 h, and were measured at baseline and after 14 days oral administration of propranolol (30 mg, n = 7) or placebo (n = 7) at 19:00 h in 14 patients.

RESULTS

A daily fluctuation of AzBF and PBF was observed, peaking at 24:00 h in nine patients. In three other patients, peak AzBF and PBF were observed both at 16:00 and 24:00 h. Two patients were constant throughout the day. When the daily variation was compared, ANOVA showed a significant difference (P < 0.001). Propranolol administration at 19:00 h reduced AzBF (-40.7 +/- 17.9% vs. baseline, P < 0.001) and PBF (-26.5 +/- 10.7% vs. baseline, P < 0.01) at 24:00 h.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that in most cirrhotics, AzBF and PBF peaks at midnight. Dosing of propranolol in the evening may be important for its role in preventing variceal bleeding.

Hemodynamic and pharmacokinetic study of tertatolol in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis and portal hypertension

Tertatolol, a recently developed beta 1-beta 2-blocker has two advantages: it does not induce withdrawal syndrome after abrupt cessation, and it preserves renal function. It has been suggested that the kinetics of tertatolol in patients with hepatic dysfunction are altered. Therefore, the hemodynamic effects and pharmacokinetics following the acute administration of tertatolol were studied in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. Systemic, splanchnic and renal hemodynamics were evaluated before and 30 min after the simultaneous administration of 2.5 mg tertatolol p.o. and 1.25 mg deuterated tertatolol i.v. in 10 cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices. The pharmacokinetics of tertatolol were evaluated over a 4-day period. Tertatolol significantly decreased heart rate (-22 +/- 10%), cardiac output (-26 +/- 8%), and hepatic blood flow (-27 +/- 23%). The hepatic venous pressure gradient decreased from 15.7 +/- 5.0 to 12.9 +/- 4.0 mmHg (-17 +/- 13%, P < 0.01). Three out of 10 patients were non-responders to tertatolol. Renal blood flow (-9 +/- 28%) and intrinsic hepatic clearance of indocyanin green (-9 +/- 25%) were not significantly modified. The duration of effective beta-blockade was far less than 12 h. Tertatolol was rapidly absorbed with a Cmax of 70 +/- 51 micrograms/l at a peak time of 0.75 +/- 0.26 h. In comparison with healthy volunteers referred to in literature sources, plasma clearance was reduced to 49 +/- 28 ml/min, bioavailability was increased to 72 +/- 20%, and the volume of distribution was increased to 50 +/- 34 l, probably due, in part, to a weaker protein binding -85%--effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)