Captopril augments both basal and frusemide-induced natriuresis in normal man by suppression of circulating angiotensin II

Pathophysiology of Diuretic Resistance and Its Implications for the Management of Chronic Heart Failure

Diuretic resistance implies a failure to increase fluid and sodium (Na+) output sufficiently to relieve volume overload, edema, or congestion, despite escalating doses of a loop diuretic to a ceiling level (80 mg of furosemide once or twice daily or greater in those with reduced glomerular filtration rate or heart failure). It is a major cause of recurrent hospitalizations in patients with chronic heart failure and predicts death but is difficult to diagnose unequivocally. Pharmacokinetic mechanisms include the low and variable bioavailability of furosemide and the short duration of all loop diuretics that provides time for the kidneys to restore diuretic-induced Na+ losses between doses. Pathophysiological mechanisms of diuretic resistance include an inappropriately high daily salt intake that exceeds the acute diuretic-induced salt loss, hyponatremia or hypokalemic, hypochloremic metabolic alkalosis, and reflex activation of the renal nerves. Nephron mechanisms include tubular tolerance that can develop even during the time that the renal tubules are exposed to a single dose of diuretic, or enhanced reabsorption in the proximal tubule that limits delivery to the loop, or an adaptive increase in reabsorption in the downstream distal tubule and collecting ducts that offsets ongoing blockade of Na+ reabsorption in the loop of Henle. These provide rationales for novel strategies including the concurrent use of diuretics that block these nephron segments and even sequential nephron blockade with multiple diuretics and aquaretics combined in severely diuretic-resistant patients with heart failure.

Long-term administration of tolvaptan increases myocardial remodeling and mortality via exacerbation of congestion in mice heart failure model after myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

In contrast to loop diuretics, tolvaptan does not cause neurohormonal activation in several animal heart failure models. However, it remains unknown whether chronic vasopressin type 2 receptor blockade exerts beneficial effects on mortality in murine heart failure after myocardial infarction (MI). In an experimental heart failure model, we tested the hypothesis that tolvaptan reduces myocardial remodeling and mortality.

METHODS AND RESULTS

MI was induced in 9-week-old male C57Bl6/J by the left coronary artery ligation. In study 1, animals were randomly assigned to treatment with placebo or tolvaptan starting 14days post-MI. In study 2, animals were randomized to tolvaptan or furosemide+tolvaptan starting 14days post-MI. Interestingly, results showed lower survival rate in tolvaptan group compared to placebo. Tolvaptan group had higher serum osmolality, heavier body weight, more severe myocardial remodeling, and lung congestion at day 28 of drug administration compared to placebo. In study 2, addition of furosemide significantly reduced mortality rate seen with tolvaptan, and presented with decreased osmolality, myocardial remodeling, and lung congestion compared to tolvaptan-treated mice. Increase in proximal tubular expression of aquaporin 1, Angiotensin II, and vasopressin seen with tolvaptan treatments were normalized to basal levels, similar to levels in placebo-treated mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to our hypothesis, tolvaptan was associated with increased mortality in murine heart failure after MI. This increase in lung congestion, myocardial remodeling, could be prevented by co-administration of furosemide, which resulted in normalized serum osmolality, neurohormonal activation, and renal aquaporin 1 expression, and hence decreased mortality post-MI.

Antihypertensive therapy: special focus on drug interactions

Today, the lifetime risk of patients aged 55-65 years to receive antihypertensive drugs approaches 60%. Yet, recent trials suggest that hypertension is not adequately controlled in the majority of patients. The prevalence of hypertension increases with advancing age, as does the prevalence of comorbid conditions and the total number of medications taken. Multi-drug therapy, advancing age and comorbid conditions are also key risk factors for adverse drug reactions and drug interactions. In this review, the authors evaluate the most frequently used antihypertensive drugs (diuretics, beta-adrenergic blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin II receptor Type 1 blockers and alpha-adrenergic blockers) with special reference to pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic drug interactions. As the spectrum of drugs prescribed is constantly changing, safety yesterday does not imply safety today and safety today does not imply safety tomorrow. Furthermore, therapeutic efficacy should not be neglected over concerns regarding drug interactions. Many patients are at risk of clinically relevant drug interactions involving antihypertensive drugs but, presently, even more patients may be at risk of suffering from the consequences of their inadequately treated hypertension. In this respect, the authors discuss controversial viewpoints on the overall clinical relevance of drug interactions occurring at the level of cytochrome P450 metabolism.

Omapatrilat: neurohormonal and pharmacodynamic profile when administered with furosemide

Pharmacodynamic effects of combination therapy with omapatrilat and furosemide were evaluated. Two groups of 13 healthy subjects each received furosemide 20 mg dailyfor 15 days coadministered with either placebo on days 6 to 15 or omapatrilat 10 mg on days 6 to 10 and 25 mg on days 11 to 15. In the omapatrilat group, urinary excretion of atrial natriuretic peptide increased, and greater blood pressure reductions were seen compared with placebo. Concomitant omapatrilat treatment did not affect the acute diuresis, natriuresis, and kaliuresis observed with chronic administration of furosemide. Neither effective renal plasma flow nor glomerularfiltration rate changed in either treatment group. No clinically significant safety issues were observed. Daily coadministration of omapatrilat 10 or 25 mg with furosemide 20 mg does not affect the pharmacodynamics offurosemide at steady state.