Lymphocyte microsomal epoxide hydrolase in patients on carbamazepine therapy

Interaction between paliperidone and carbamazepine

BACKGROUND

This aim of this study was to determine the impact of carbamazepine on the pharmacokinetics of paliperidone.

METHODS

Six schizophrenic patients initially received a 6-12 mg/d dose of paliperidone alone. Subsequently, a 200 mg/d dose of carbamazepine was administered, and the carbamazepine dose was increased to 400 mg/d and then 600 mg/d. Plasma concentrations of paliperidone before and after carbamazepine coadministration were quantified using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

RESULTS

Carbamazepine significantly reduced the plasma concentration of paliperidone. The plasma concentration of paliperidone at baseline and with coadministration of 200, 400, and 600 mg/d were 45.8 ± 11.7, 26.9 ± 13.7, 17.1 ± 8.2, and 15.9 ± 7.6 ng/mL, respectively. The concentration of paliperidone with carbamazepine coadministration at doses of 200, 400, and 600 mg/d were 55.7% ± 20.7%, 36.1% ± 12.2%, and 33.6% ± 10.4%, respectively, of baseline. This effect occurred even at the carbamazepine dose of 200 mg/d and reached a plateau at doses higher than 400 mg/d. However, carbamazepine coadministration exacerbated the psychotic symptoms in some patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study suggest that adjunctive treatment with carbamazepine reduces the concentration of paliperidone in a dose-dependent manner, most likely because of the induction of several drug-metabolizing enzymes and several drug transporters.

Induction of P-glycoprotein in lymphocytes by carbamazepine and rifampicin: the role of nuclear hormone response elements

AIMS

Carbamazepine (CBZ) is an inducer of cytochrome P450 enzymes, which have been implicated in many drug interactions. However, for immunosuppressant and anti-HIV drugs, whose main site of action is the lymphocyte, induction of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) may also be important. In this study, we have investigated whether CBZ acts as an inducer of Pgp in lymphocytes.

METHODS

Pgp expression was assessed by flow cytometry and real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction using lymphocytes from four healthy subjects after incubation with therapeutic concentrations of CBZ, using rifampicin as a positive control. Binding to DR-4 elements in the MDR1 promoter was assessed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and a luciferase-reporter construct.

RESULTS

CBZ increased MDR1 mRNA expression at 6 h by 3.7-fold [95% confidence interval (CI) 0, 7.6) when compared with controls. CBZ increased lymphocyte Pgp expression at 72 h by 7.6-fold (95% CI 2.1, 13.2) over control values. EMSA revealed a 2.1-fold (95% CI 1.5, 2.7) increased binding to the DR-4 element of CBZ when compared with control values. Activation of the DR-4 element was confirmed using reporter constructs. Rifampicin also had similar effects in all experiments.

CONCLUSIONS

Carbamazepine induces Pgp in a manner comparable to rifampicin, by increasing binding to the DR4 element. This has implications for interactions involving drugs whose site of action is the lymphocyte.

Induction of the metabolism of etizolam by carbamazepine in humans

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of carbamazepine on the single oral dose pharmacokinetics of etizolam.

METHODS

Eleven healthy male volunteers received carbamazepine 200 mg/day or placebo for 6 days in a double-blind, randomized, crossover manner, and on the sixth day they received a single oral 1-mg dose of etizolam. Blood samplings and evaluation of psychomotor function by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test and Stanford Sleepiness Scale were conducted up to 24 h after etizolam dosing. Plasma concentration of etizolam was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Carbamazepine treatment significantly decreased the peak plasma concentration (17.5+/-4.1 ng/ml versus 13.9+/-4.1 ng/ml; P<0.05), total area under the plasma concentration-time curve (194.8+/-88.9 ng h/ml versus 105.9+/-33.0 ng h/ml; P<0.001), and elimination half-life (11.1+/-4.6 h versus 6.8+/-2.8 h; P<0.01) of etizolam. No significant change was induced by carbamazepine in the two pharmacodynamic parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that carbamazepine induces the metabolism of etizolam.

Effects of various CYP2D6 genotypes on the steady-state plasma concentrations of risperidone and its active metabolite, 9-hydroxyrisperidone, in Japanese patients with schizophrenia

The effects of various CYP2D6 genotypes on the steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) of risperidone and its active metabolite, 9-hydroxyrisperidone, were studied in 85 Japanese schizophrenic patients (27 men and 58 women) treated with 6 mg/d risperidone for at least 2 weeks. Plasma concentrations of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The patients had the following CYP2D6 genotypes: wild-type (wt)/wt (40 patients), CYP2D6*10 (*10)/wt ( 28), CYP2D6*5 (*5)/wt ( 8), *10/*10 ( 5), *5/*10 ( 3), and CYP2D6*4/CYP2D6*14 ( 1), respectively. The Css values of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone were corrected to the median body weight of 58 kg. The medians (ranges) of the Css of risperidone in the aforementioned genotype groups were 2.2 (0.37-35.7), 6.4 (2.1-26.5), 12.3 (4.7-39.5), 19.4 (13.4-26.4), 64.0 (41.6-68.8), and 91.8 nmol/L. Those values for risperidone-to-9-hydroxyrisperidone ratio were 0.03 (0.01-0.33), 0.06 (0.03-0.19), 0.14 (0.07-0.29), 0.28 (0.25-0.38), 0.48 (0.38-0.58), and 2.35, respectively. The Css of risperidone was significantly (P < 0.05 or P < 0.001) different among the four genotype groups (wt/wt, *10/wt, *5/wt, and *10/*10), except between the *5/wt and *10/*10 groups. Also, the risperidone-to-9-hydroxyrisperidone ratio significantly (P < 0.005 or P < 0.001) differed among these genotype groups. No significant differences were found in the Css of 9-hydroxyrisperidone and the active moiety (the Css of risperidone plus 9-hydroxyrisperidone) among these genotype groups. This study confirms previous findings that the CYP2D6 status affects the Css of risperidone via its strong regulation of 9-hydroxylation of risperidone. However, similar active moiety of risperidone among different genotype groups suggests that the determination of the CYP2D6 genotype has little importance for clinical situations.

Pretreatment of rats with the inducing agents phenobarbitone and 3-methylcholanthrene ameliorates the toxicity of chromium (VI) in hepatocytes

To exert cytotoxicity chromium VI (Cr(VI)) has to be reduced inside cells. This is achieved through both enzymatic and non-enzymatic mechanisms. Enzymatic mechanisms include DT-diaphorase, cytochrome P450, and NADPH cytochrome c reductase, and non-enzymatic mechanisms involve reduced glutathione (GSH) and ascorbic acid. The extent of cytotoxicity of Cr(VI) may thus be influenced by the availability of non-enzymatic reductants, and by the activities of the reductase enzymes. In the present paper we have investigated the effect of pretreatment with the inducing agents, phenobarbitone (PB) and 3-methylcholanthrene (3-MC), on the response of rat hepatocytes to Cr(VI). Pretreatment with PB increased the activity of NADPH cytochrome c reductase, and 3-MC increased DT-diaphorase activity in hepatocytes. Both inducers increased cytochrome P450 content, while neither influenced intracellular GSH content or the activity of glutathione reductase. Pretreatment with either PB or 3-MC resulted in amelioration of Cr(VI) toxicity both in terms of hepatocyte viability, and to a greater extent, in terms of Cr(VI) induced GSH loss. We propose that the inducing agents increase the amount of enzymatic reduction of Cr(VI) relative to non-enzymatic reduction. Thus, less GSH is used in the reduction of Cr(VI), and intracellular GSH does not fall as rapidly as in cells from control animals therefore cell integrity is better maintained. Exposure to environmental inducing agents in vivo may also alter the response of human tissues to Cr(VI).

Variant metabolizing gene alleles determine the genotoxicity of benzo[a]pyrene

Understanding the mechanisms involved with genetic susceptibility to environmental disease is of major interest to the scientific community. We have conducted an in vitro study to elucidate the involvement of polymorphic metabolizing genes on the genotoxicity of benzo[a]pyrene (BP). Blood samples from 38 donors were treated with BP and the induction of sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) and chromosome aberrations (CA) were evaluated. The latter is based on the tandem-probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay. The data indicate that the induction of genotoxicity was clearly determined by the inherited variant genotypes for glutathione-S-transferase (GSTM1) and microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EH). In a comparison of the two biomarkers, the CA biomarker shows a more definite association with the genotypes than does SCE. For example, the presence of the GSTM1 null genotype (GSTM1 0/0) is responsible for the highest level and significant induction of CA, irrespective of the presence of other genotypes in the different donors. This effect is further enhanced significantly by the presence of the excessive activation EH gene allele (EH4*) and decreased by the reduced activation EH gene allele (EH3*). Overall, the modulation of genotoxicity by the susceptibility genotypes provides support of their potential involvement in environmental cancer. Furthermore, the data indicate that the variant enzymes function independently by contributing their metabolic capability toward the expression of biologic activities. Therefore, studies like this one can be used to resolve the complexity of genetic susceptibility to environmental disease in human.

Pharmacokinetics of haloperidol: an update

Haloperidol is commonly used in the therapy of patients with acute and chronic schizophrenia. The enzymes involved in the biotransformation of haloperidol include cytochrome P450 (CYP), carbonyl reductase and uridine diphosphoglucose glucuronosyltransferase. The greatest proportion of the intrinsic hepatic clearance of haloperidol is by glucuronidation, followed by the reduction of haloperidol to reduced haloperidol and by CYP-mediated oxidation. In studies of CYP-mediated disposition in vitro, CYP3A4 appears to be the major isoform responsible for the metabolism of haloperidol in humans. The intrinsic clearances of the back-oxidation of reduced haloperidol to the parent compound, oxidative N-dealkylation and pyridinium formation are of the same order of magnitude, suggesting that the same enzyme system is responsible for the 3 reactions. Large variation in the catalytic activity was observed in the CYP-mediated reactions, whereas there appeared to be only small variations in the glucuronidation and carbonyl reduction pathways. Haloperidol is a substrate of CYP3A4 and an inhibitor, as well as a stimulator, of CYP2D6. Reduced haloperidol is also a substrate of CYP3A4 and inhibitor of CYP2D6. Pharmacokinetic interactions occur between haloperidol and various drugs given concomitantly, for example, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, nefazodone, venlafaxine, buspirone, alprazolam, rifampicin (rifampin), quinidine and carteolol. Overall, drug interaction studies have suggested that CYP3A4 is involved in the biotransformation of haloperidol in humans. Interactions of haloperidol with most drugs lead to only small changes in plasma haloperidol concentrations, suggesting that the interactions have little clinical significance. On the other hand, the coadministration of carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, rifampicin or quinidine affects the pharmacokinetics of haloperidol to an extent that alterations in clinical consequences would be expected. In vivo pharmacogenetic studies have indicated that the metabolism and disposition of haloperidol may be regulated by genetically determined polymorphic CYP2D6 activity. However, these findings appear to contradict those from studies in vitro with human liver microsomes and from studies of drug interactions in vivo. Interethnic and pharmacogenetic differences in haloperidol metabolism may explain these observations.

No pharmacokinetic but pharmacodynamic interactions between cisapride and bromperidol or haloperidol

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between the gastrokinetic drug cisapride and the antipsychotic drugs bromperidol and haloperidol were studied in 29 schizophrenic inpatients. Fourteen patients were taking bromperidol (12-24 mg/d), and 15 were taking haloperidol (12-36 mg/d). Cisapride 10 mg/d was coadministered for 1 week, and blood sampling was performed before cisapride treatment, 1 week after starting cisapride treatment, and I week after stopping cisapride treatment. On the same days as the blood sampling, psychotic symptoms and side effects were evaluated using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser (UKU) side effect rating scale (UKU), respectively. Plasma concentrations of bromperidol, haloperidol, and their reduced metabolites were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The mean BPRS scores after adding cisapride were significantly higher than those before cisapride (p<0.01) and after stopping cisapride (p<0.001) in the haloperidol group in this uncontrolled study. A similar tendency was observed in the bromperidol group, although it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). Cisapride coadministration caused no significant changes in the mean plasma concentrations of bromperidol, haloperidol, and their reduced metabolites or in the mean UKU score. The present study suggests that there is no significant pharmacokinetic interaction between cisapride and bromperidol or haloperidol, but cisapride appears to deteriorate psychotic symptoms by a pharmacodynamic interaction in schizophrenic patients treated with haloperidol.

Cytochrome P450 1A1 in rat peripheral blood lymphocytes: inducibility in vivo and bioactivation of benzo[a]pyrene in the Salmonella typhimurium mutagenicity assay in vitro

The presence and inducibility of CYP1A1 in freshly isolated peripheral blood lymphocytes was examined in untreated rats and in rats pretreated with agents known to induce the enzyme in other tissues, as well as dexamethasone [CAS #50-02-2], which is not commonly associated with CYP1A1 induction. CYP1A1 but not CYP1A2 was detected by Western blot analysis of lymphocytes from untreated rats and was induced in lymphocytes from rats treated with the known CYP1A inducers beta-naphthoflavone [CAS #6051-87-2] or 3-methylcholanthrene [CAS #56-49-5] (7.3-fold), cigarette smoke (2. 8-fold), and pyridine [CAS #108-86-1] (2.6-fold). CYP1A1 was also induced in lymphocytes from rats treated with the nonprototypic inducer dexamethasone (17.7-fold) or bromobenzene [CAS #108-86-1] (3. 9-fold). Lymphocyte homogenate from rats treated with the inducers also catalyzed NADPH-dependent bioactivation of benzo[a]pyrene [CAS #50-32-8] to mutagens. The benzo(a)pyrene mutagenicity was detected using Salmonella typhimurium TA100 in the Ames test, and correlated positively with lymphocyte CYP1A1 content. The data show that CYP1A1 is present in rat peripheral blood lymphocytes in vivo, and is inducible by prototypic, as well as nonprototypic, inducers of the enzyme.

Genetic analysis of microsomal epoxide hydrolase in patients with carbamazepine hypersensitivity

Carbamazepine therapy is occasionally complicated by hypersensitivity reactions, the mechanism of which is poorly understood. It has been suggested that affected individuals may have a genetically-determined defect of microsomal epoxide hydrolase. The aim of this study was to determine whether a single genetic mutation or pattern of mutations could be used to predict individual susceptibility to carbamazepine-hypersensitivity. DNA was isolated from 10 carbamazepine-hypersensitive patients and 10 healthy volunteers. The patients had developed various forms of toxicity with carbamazepine, including toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, hepatitis and pneumonitis. The technique of polymerase chain reaction single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis (PCR-SSCP) was used to screen for mutations in all nine exons of the microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene. Any new mutations detected by this method were characterised by direct sequencing of the DNA. In addition, in the most severely affected patient, we sequenced all nine exons of the gene. There was a higher frequency of mutations in the hypersensitive group when compared with the controls, but there was no consistent mutation (or pattern of mutations) in the microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene which was common to the hypersensitive group. DNA sequencing of all nine exons of the microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene from the most severely affected patient showed the sequence to be "wild-type," when compared to the previously published sequences. The results of this study suggest that a single mutation within the coding region of the microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene cannot be the sole determinant of the predisposition to carbamazepine hypersensitivity.

Kinetic parameters of lymphocyte microsomal epoxide hydrolase in carbamazepine hypersensitive patients. Assessment by radiometric HPLC

Idiosyncratic hypersensitivity reactions with carbamazepine have been postulated to be due to a deficiency of microsomal epoxide hydrolase (HYL1), although this is based on indirect evidence. Using 3H-cis stilbene oxide (0.5 Ci/mmol) as a substrate, we have developed a radiometric HPLC assay sensitive enough to measure the kinetic parameters of HYL1 in lymphocytes. The intra-assay coefficient of variation was 8%. Enzyme activity has been measured in lymphocytes from six carbamazepine hypersensitive patients, six patients on carbamazepine without any adverse effects, and twelve drug-naive healthy volunteers. No significant difference was observed in three kinetic parameters of the enzyme among these three groups. The values for Km, Vmax, and intrinsic clearance ranged from 6.1-89.9 microM, 3.0-23.2 pmoles diol formed/min/mg protein, and 0.147-0.493 microliter/min/mg protein. There was no difference in enzyme activity between patients currently on carbamazepine and healthy volunteers, indicating a lack of induction of lymphocyte HYL1 by carbamazepine. Co-incubation of lymphocytes with 1,1,1-trichloropropene oxide, an inhibitor of hepatic HYL1, resulted in an 82% inhibition of activity, similar to that observed with the hepatic enzyme. The healthy volunteers were genotyped as being either GSTM1 positive (n = 6) or GSTM1 negative (n = 6). This did not affect the kinetic parameters of lymphocyte microsomal epoxide hydrolase. Our results suggest that there is normal HYL1 activity in lymphocytes of hypersensitive patients using cis-stilbene oxide as a substrate.

Pharmacokinetics of the novel antiestrogenic agent toremifene in subjects with altered liver and kidney function

OBJECTIVES

The pharmacokinetics of toremifene was investigated in an open study with four parallel groups of 10 subjects each. Subjects with impaired liver function (biopsy-proven liver disease), activated liver function (drug-induced), and impaired kidney function were compared with normal subjects.

METHODS

A single oral 120 mg dose of toremifene was administered after an overnight fast, and blood samples were collected over 28 days. Serum levels of toremifene and its metabolites were determined; appropriate pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated and statistically evaluated.

RESULTS

In normal subjects, the average peak level of 414 ng/ml toremifene was achieved at 3 hours after dosing, the terminal half-life was 6.2 days, apparent oral clearance was 5.1 L/hr, apparent volume of distribution was 958 L, and the fraction not bound to protein was 0.3%. The peak level (130 ng/ml) of the major metabolite, N-demethyltoremifene, appeared in serum with large variation in the time to peak level (median, 3 days) and a terminal half-life of 21.0 days. Low levels of deaminohydroxytoremifene were also measured, and two other metabolites could be quantified at some time points in some patients. The elimination rate of toremifene and the main metabolite was significantly increased in patients with activated liver function, resulting in decreased terminal half-lives (3.0 days and 4.5 days, respectively), and was decreased in patients with impaired liver function (10.9 days and 29.6 days, respectively). The subjects with impaired kidney function showed normal elimination kinetics.

CONCLUSION

Liver, but not kidney, function should be taken into account when toremifene is administered.

CYP3A4 and CYP2A6 activities marked by the metabolism of lignocaine and coumarin in patients with liver and kidney diseases and epileptic patients

1. The in vitro hepatic metabolism of lignocaine to monoethylglycinexylide (MEGX) is mediated by CYP3A4 and that of coumarin to 7-hydroxycoumarin (7OHC) by CYP2A6. We investigated the usefulness of monitoring serum MEGX concentrations (after 1 mg kg-1 lignocaine i.v.) and urinary 7OHC excretion (after 5 mg coumarin p.o.) to reflect liver function in patients with liver (n = 36), kidney (n = 12) and epileptic (n = 12) disease and in control subjects (n = 20). The extent of liver disease was assessed using measurements of serum aminoterminal propeptide (PIIINP) and Child-Pugh grades. 2. Serum concentrations of MEGX were decreased in severe (4.6 +/- 3.0 s.d. ng ml-1), moderate (19.1 +/- 11.6 s.d. ng ml-1) and mild (32.8 +/- 14.2 s.d ng ml-1) liver disease as compared with controls (53.4 +/- 15.8 s.d ng ml-1). The excretion of 7OHC over 2 h was decreased in severe (18.0 +/- 10.3 s.d % of dose) and moderate (34.2 +/- 15.6 s.d %), but not in mild (49.7 +/- 19.0 s.d %) liver disease as compared with that in controls (56.2 +/- 11.6%). 3. In epileptic patients the urinary recovery of 7OHC was increased (2 h value 69.5 +/- 13.2 s.d %) suggesting enzyme induction. In contrast, serum MEGX concentration were low (40.0 +/- 14.1 s.d ng ml-1), possibly due to competition for CYP3A4 between lignocaine and antiepileptic drugs. 4. In patients with kidney disease serum MEGX concentration (56.5 +/- 26.1 s.d ng ml-1) was similar to that in controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)