Twenty-four hour efficacy of two dose levels of a once daily sustained-release diltiazem formulation in stable angina: a placebo-controlled trial. The Dildurang Study Group

Reduction of resting heart rate with antianginal drugs: review and meta-analysis

The benefit of heart rate (HR) reduction in patients with stable coronary artery disease is well demonstrated for symptom prevention and relief, and benefits on outcomes are being actively investigated. We aimed to quantify the reduction in resting HR induced by 5 antianginal drugs frequently used for symptom prevention (diltiazem, verapamil, atenolol, metoprolol, and ivabradine) in stable angina pectoris. We identified studies published between 1966 and 2007 in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database and reviewed the bibliographies to locate additional studies. Eligible studies were double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials in patients with stable angina. Trials were combined using weighted mean difference and fixed-effect model meta-analysis. The main outcome measure was resting HR at the study end. For diltiazem, resting HR reduction versus placebo ranged from -0.08 beats per minute (bpm) [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.5 to +1.4] for 120 mg/d to -8.0 bpm (95% CI, -11.1 to -5.0) with 360 mg/d. For sustained-release diltiazem, there was a reduction in resting HR of -4.5 bpm (95% CI, -6.4 to -2.5), with no dose-response relationship (heterogeneity P = 0.62). Resting HR reductions for the other agents were -3.2 bpm (95% CI, -5.1 to -1.3) for verapamil (with no dose-response relationship, heterogeneity P = 0.87); -19.0 bpm (95% CI, -20.4 to -17.6) for atenolol; -13.2 bpm (95% CI, -14.7 to -11.7) for metoprolol (with greater reductions for 150 mg/d and long-acting 190 mg/d); and between -9.3 bpm (95% CI, -13.8 to -4.8) and -19.6 bpm (95% CI, -23.8 to -15.4) for ivabradine. Ivabradine, atenolol, and metoprolol give similar reductions in resting HR (-10 to -20 bpm), whereas verapamil and diltiazem produce only marginal reductions (<10 bpm).

Heart rate-lowering and -regulating effects of once-daily sustained-release diltiazem

BACKGROUND

Epidemiologic evidence suggests that an elevated heart rate (HR) is an adverse and independent prognostic factor in arterial hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases. Although diltiazem is characterized as an HR-lowering calcium antagonist, no studies have quantified the magnitude of HR changes in patients with angina or hypertension.

HYPOTHESIS

The study was undertaken to explore the magnitude of proportional HR reduction at varying levels of resting HR with the sustained-release formulation of diltiazem (SR diltiazem) at the usual clinical doses of 200 or 300 mg once daily.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was conducted on six comparative double-blind studies including 771 patients with angina or hypertension in which SR diltiazem 200-300 mg once daily was compared either with placebo or with other agents known not to influence HR (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics). Sustained-release diltiazem decreases elevated baseline HR, with an increasing effect at higher initial rates.

RESULTS

Multiple comparisons by baseline HR category showed a significant difference between both groups for baseline HR of 74-84 beats/min and > or = 85 beats/min (p = 0.001). Sustained-release diltiazem had no significant HR-decreasing effect on baseline HR < or =74 beats/min but appears to have a genuine regulating effect on HR: it reduces tachycardia without inducing excessive bradycardia. These findings are in contrast to those with dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, which tend to increase HR and have been associated with an adverse outcome in acute cardiovascular conditions. At the same time, there is evidence to suggest that HR-lowering calcium-channel blockers decrease cardiovascular event rates following myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSION

When calcium antagonists are indicated for use in patients with angina or hypertension, an HR-lowering agent, that is, diltiazem rather than dihydropyridine, should be recommended.