Late prurigo of pregnancy

Pregnancy dermatoses: diagnosis, management, and controversies

Some aspects regarding the etiology and the nosologic classification of various pregnancy dermatoses are highly controversial. While some authors highlight the existence of premises allowing several skin disorders to be re-grouped within broader disease concepts, others underline the absence of clear, undisputed etiopathogenetic data that could support such classifications. This review exhaustively analyzes the various pregnancy dermatoses (pemphigoid gestationis, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, impetigo herpetiformis, polymorphic eruption of pregnancy, and the papular dermatoses of pregnancy [prurigo of pregnancy, pruritic folliculitis of pregnancy, and the new classification, atopic eruption of pregnancy]) in an attempt to shed light over this confusing and disputed domain, while subsequently offering an algorithmic approach to their diagnosis and management. While for pemphigus gestationis, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, and impetigo herpetiformis, specific diagnostic tests such as histopathology, immunofluorescence, or laboratory investigations will confirm the diagnosis, the identification of the other types of pregnancy dermatoses is based only on clinical criteria. In this context, the review argues for the inclusion of the whole group represented by the papular dermatoses of pregnancy within the broad spectrum of polymorphic eruption of pregnancy, separating each of these entities by focusing on their onset: early-onset polymorphic eruption of pregnancy (comprising prurigo of pregnancy, pruritic folliculitis of pregnancy, and atopic eruption of pregnancy) and late-onset polymorphic eruption of pregnancy. In light of the same practical approach guiding it, the review provides updated treatment strategies for each of these conditions.

Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy: polymorphic eruption of pregnancy (PUPPP)

The most commonly diagnosed pruritic dermatosis of pregnancy has a confusing nomenclature. The most commonly term used in the United States is pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy (PUPPP), and in Great Britain, since 1982, polymorphic eruption of pregnancy. The etiology of PUPPP is still unknown. Placental products, hormonal alterations, and damage to connective tissue with subsequent conversion of nonantigenic molecules to antigenic ones, have been proposed as possible causes. The maternal and fetal prognosis is excellent. Treatment consists of topical or oral corticosteroids. Delivery does not usually provide relief of symptoms.

Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy: current status

Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy is a common benign dermatosis of pregnancy that was described in 1979 as an intensely pruritic urticarial cutaneous eruption. This is a well-defined clinical entity that mainly occurs in primigravidas in the third trimester, which resolves spontaneously or with delivery and is usually responsive to topical treatments. The aetiology of PUPPP is obscure. Histology is non-specific, but consistently shows mild lymphohistiocytic perivascular inflammatory infiltrate with a variable number of eosinophils. Immunofluorescent studies are negative. The maternal and fetal prognosis are generally unaffected, and the condition is usually responsive to topical corticosteroids and oral antihistamines.

A prospective study of 200 women with dermatoses of pregnancy correlating clinical findings with hormonal and immunopathological profiles

In 1994 we set up a specialist clinic for pregnancy dermatoses, both to improve the management of pregnant women with skin problems and to enhance our general understanding of the pregnancy dermatoses. This clinic has provided a large database of 200 women which has formed the basis for a prospective study over a 2-year period. In each case the dermatological diagnosis was clearly defined on clinical criteria, with additional help from histopathology and direct immunofluorescence of the skin where appropriate. We have included a number of patients who presented with relatively trivial diagnoses, as this reflects the referral patterns of our midwives, general practitioners and obstetricians within our hospital and local population. Our results show that all patients with specific dermatoses of pregnancy conformed well to the classification established by Holmes and Black in 1983. The role of the sex hormones [oestradiol, human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) and cortisol] in polymorphic eruption (PEP) and prurigo of pregnancy was studied in 125 cases and compared with 138 normal healthy pregnant controls. For pruritic folliculitis (PF), serum androgens were measured to establish if these were elevated. Nearly all patients were followed up postpartum, with respect to both maternal and fetal prognosis (some were unfortunately lost to follow-up). Many patients were primiparous (47%) and presented in their third trimester (49%). This study shows a surprisingly high prevalence of eczema during pregnancy. It is possible that earlier cases in the literature termed prurigo of pregnancy may in fact have been eczema, thus explaining the low incidence of prurigo in this study. Hormonal analysis showed a significant reduction in serum cortisol levels in patients with PEP compared with normal pregnant controls (P = 0.03), although hCG and oestradiol showed no differences. Serum androgens were not significantly elevated in patients with PF compared with controls. Birthweight (analysed by the individualized birthweight ratio) was significantly reduced in both the PF and pemphigoid gestationis groups. In the PEP and PF groups there was a male/female infant ratio of 2 : 1, not noted in previous studies. In all cases studied there were no adverse effects either on maternal or fetal outcome as a result of the pregnancy dermatosis. This study indicates that all patients fulfilled the criteria of the previous classification of the specific dermatoses of pregnancy, although we also now highlight the frequency of eczema in pregnancy and speculate as to possible causes. There were no cases of papular dermatitis of pregnancy. We feel that the specialist clinic is an important service which has improved the management of these women and identified areas for further research.

Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy: clinical and immunopathologic observations in 57 patients

BACKGROUND

Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy (PUPPP) has been described either as a homogeneous or a polymorphic clinical process. Its cause is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We attempted to characterize the clinical and immunopathologic findings in PUPPP on the basis of long-term clinical and immunopathologic observations.

METHODS

The clinical and immunopathologic features of 57 patients with PUPPP were evaluated.

RESULTS

The clinical features in 57 patients with PUPPP were categorized into three types: mainly urticarial papules and plaques (type I), nonurticarial erythema, papules, or vesicles (type II), and combinations of the two forms (type III). Direct immunofluorescence studies in 48 of the 57 patients showed nonspecific immunoreactants in dermal blood vessels and/or moderate granular deposits at the dermoepidermal junction in 15 patients.

CONCLUSION

Type I PUPPP differed from types II and III in clinical appearance and distribution (absence of face, palm, and sole lesions), but trimester onset, parity, and direct immunofluorescence findings were not significantly different among the three groups.

Familial occurrence of pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy (PUPPP) was noted in four women with unusual family relationships.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to document the occurrence of PUPPP in these families and to make observations on their possible relevance.

METHODS

Case reports of the four patients are detailed. Histologic and HLA studies are recorded.

RESULTS

In both families, sisters were married to brothers. A common paternal influence is suggested.

CONCLUSION

We postulate that PUPPP may be a maternal response to a circulating paternal factor for which tolerance develops in subsequent pregnancies.