Acute generalized exanthematous pustular dermatitis induced by diltiazem

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis caused by diltiazem

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis is clinically characterized by fever, pruritus and an acute pustular eruption. It can be described as having an abrupt onset and then spontaneous resolution occurs shortly after the start of symptoms, and there is usually only a single episode. Most cases have been triggered by the ingestion of drugs. Diltiazem hydrochloride is a calcium channel blocker that is commonly used for treating hypertension and angina. This drug was found to be the responsible agent in our current patient. There have been 9 such case reports in the English medical literature, yet this is the first such report in the Korean medical literature. We present the case of a 51-year-old male who experienced an acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis due to diltiazem hydrochloride and we review the relevant literature.

Risk factors for acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP)-results of a multinational case-control study (EuroSCAR)

BACKGROUND

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a disease characterized by the rapid occurrence of many sterile, nonfollicular pustules usually arising on an oedematous erythema often accompanied by leucocytosis and fever. It is usually attributed to drugs.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the risk for different drugs of causing AGEP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multinational case-control study (EuroSCAR) conducted to evaluate the risk for different drugs of causing severe cutaneous adverse reactions; the study included 97 validated community cases of AGEP and 1009 controls. Results Strongly associated drugs, i.e. drugs with a lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the odds ratio (OR) > 5 were pristinamycin (CI 26-infinity), ampicillin/amoxicillin (CI 10-infinity), quinolones (CI 8.5-infinity), (hydroxy)chloroquine (CI 8-infinity), anti-infective sulphonamides (CI 7.1-infinity), terbinafine (CI 7.1-infinity) and diltiazem (CI 5.0-infinity). No significant risk was found for infections and a personal or family history of psoriasis (CI 0.7-2.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Medications associated with AGEP differ from those associated with Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis. Different timing patterns from drug intake to reaction onset were observed for different drugs. Infections, although possible triggers, played no prominent role in causing AGEP and there was no evidence that AGEP is a variant of pustular psoriasis.

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Case report

Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis (AGEP) is a drug-induced dermatosis characterized by an acute episode of sterile pustules over erythematous-edematous skin. It is accompanied by an episode of fever, which regresses a few days after discontinuation of the drug that caused the condition or as a result of corticosteroid treatment. The main triggering drugs are antibiotics, mainly beta-lactam ones. Other medications, such as antifungal agents, non steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics, antiarrhythmic, anticonvulsant and antidepressant drugs, may also be responsible. Histologically, it is characterized by the existence of vasculitis, associated with non-follicular subcorneal pustules. A case of a Caucasian female outpatient unit of Dermatology with AGEP, who presented with generalized pustulosis lesions after the use of cephalosporin for urinary infection is related. The diagnosis was confirmed by the clinical and pathological correlations, the resolution of the dermatosis after discontinuation of the drug and use of systemic corticosteroid treatment, and the recurrence of the disorder after the introduction of a similar drug. The importance of the recognition of this drug-induced dermatosis is given by its main differential clinical and histological diagnoses: generalized pustular psoriasis and subcorneal pustulosis.

Adverse dermatologic effects of cardiovascular drug therapy: part II

Cardiovascular disease is common, affecting an increasing number of persons as the population ages. To combat this growing health problem, physicians use a multitude of medications in the treatment of their patients. Although pharmacologic therapy greatly enhances quality of life for a majority of patients, there is always the potential for an unfavorable reaction. For example, cardiovascular drugs can induce a vast array of adverse dermatologic responses. This article reviews the various cutaneous reaction patterns that can occur as a result of treatment with class III, IV, and other antiarrhythmic agents, ACE inhibitors, Angiotensin II receptor blockers, and diuretics.

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP)--a clinical reaction pattern

BACKGROUND

A wide range of diseases or reactions can cause pustular eruptions of the skin. In this spectrum there seems to be a subgroup with characteristic clinical features and a typical course which is mostly caused by drugs for which the term acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) has been established.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical features of AGEP.

METHODS

The authors' experience from a multinational epidemiological study on severe cutaneous adverse reactions and a comprehensive review of the literature were used to provide an overview of the disease and it's possible causes. An algorithm for validating cases which was established for this study is also presented.

RESULTS

AGEP typically presents with at least dozens of non follicular sterile pustules occurring on a diffuse, edematous erythema predominantly in the folds and/or on the face. Fever and elevated blood neutrophils are common. Histopathology typically shows spongiform subcorneal and/or intraepidermal pustules, a marked edema of the papillary dermis, and eventually vasculitis, eosinophils and/or focal necrosis of keratinocytes. Onset is acute, most often following drug intake, but viral infections can also trigger the disease. Pustules resolve spontaneously in less than 15 days.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis AGEP should be considered in cases of acute pustular rashes and detection of the causative drug should be strived for. Knowledge of the clinical features and usual course of this disease can often prevent unnecessary therapeutical measures.

The spectrum of cutaneous reactions associated with diltiazem: three cases and a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous reactions ranging from exanthems to severe adverse events have been reported in association with calcium channel blockers.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to document cutaneous eruptions resulting from use of diltiazem.

METHODS

We describe three patients who experienced a cutaneous reaction (i.e., hypersensitivity syndrome reaction, pruritic exanthematous eruption, and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis) possibly induced by diltiazem, summarize adverse reaction reports obtained from the Health Protection Branch, and review the literature on calcium channel blockers inducing cutaneous reactions.

RESULTS

Of the 315 cases of possible diltiazem-induced adverse reactions that were reported to the Health Protection Branch, 151 (48%) were cutaneous. The number of diltiazem-induced cutaneous events was significantly greater than those induced by either nifedipine or verapamil. However, no difference was found in the proportion of serious cutaneous adverse events to either of the three drugs.

CONCLUSION

Diltiazem has been associated with a variety of cutaneous reactions that appear to occur more frequently than with other calcium channel blockers.

Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus arising in the setting of calcium channel blocker therapy

After 6 months to 5 years of calcium channel blocker (CCB) therapy for arterial hypertension, nine patients developed photoinduced annular or papulosquamous eruptions consonant clinically with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE). Four patients were receiving diltiazem, four received verapamil, and one was taking nifedipine. Serology showed antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in seven of nine patients, anti-Ro antibodies in five, and anti-La antibodies in five, with three patients having only anti-La antibodies. Skin biopsy specimens in all nine patients were held to be characteristic of SCLE based on light microscopy, direct, and indirect immunofluorescence. The CCB was discontinued in all; in 8 patients in whom the CCB was stopped, the eruption resolved. A proposed mechanism by which the CCBs may have precipitated the eruptions is offered.

Toxic pustuloderma associated with clemastine therapy

Toxic pustuloderma is an acute pustular eruption of the skin occurring a few days after the initiation of treatment with the responsible drug. A case of toxic pustuloderma following treatment with the antihistamine clemastine is now reported.

Diltiazem-induced acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis

Pustulation is a major feature in several different dermatoses, and it may also occur as a manifestation of drug hypersensitivity. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is an uncommon eruption characterized by acute, extensive formation of sterile pustules, fever and peripheral blood leucocytosis. It shares several clinical and histological features in common with pustular psoriasis. Most reported cases have been triggered by ingestion of broad spectrum antibiotics, particularly betalactams and macrolides. There is usually rapid resolution of the eruption on drug withdrawal. We report the case of a 58 year-old woman who developed AGEP shortly after commencing treatment with the calcium channel blocker diltiazem hydrochloride. The eruption followed a biphasic course, and improved following treatment with systemic corticosteroids and methotrexate. AGEP appears to be a rare adverse cutaneous reaction to diltiazem, whereas a wide range of other skin eruptions have been reported more commonly with this drug.

Pustulosis acuta generalisata is a post-streptococcal disease and is distinct from acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis

Generalized pustular eruptions with fever present a diagnostic and therapeutic problem. Based on a case of pustulosis acuta generalisata and a review of the literature, this entity can be regarded as an exclusively post-streptococcal disorder with an elevated antistreptolysin titre. It has a distinct clinical presentation of isolated pustules on normal skin, predominantly in an acral location. We propose criteria for the clear separation of this disease from acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis and from pustular psoriasis.

Adverse dermatologic reactions from antiarrhythmic drug therapy

Undesirable cutaneous reactions to drugs may occur early or late in the course of treatment. The ingestion of drugs may also aggravate existing dermatologic conditions. The adverse dermatologic reactions from antiarrhythmic drug therapy are reviewed. The exact incidence of dermatologic side effects from cardiovascular drugs has been difficult to estimate because of sporadic reporting. In this review, the cutaneous side effects are discussed according to drug class and the type of dermatologic reaction.

Pustular eruption after drug exposure: is it pustular psoriasis or a pustular drug eruption?

Generalized pustular eruptions with fever present a diagnostic challenge. A history of preceding drug exposure, and rapid disappearance of the eruption after the drug is stopped, suggest a drug-induced aetiology rather than pustular psoriasis. We describe and evaluate the clinical and histological features of four patients who developed a generalized pustular eruption following drug administration. The history of preceding drug exposure and the presence of a variable number of eosinophils in the inflammatory infiltrate in the lesions of these cases suggested that the generalized pustular eruptions were drug-induced.

Cutaneous reactions induced by calcium channel blocker: high frequency of psoriasiform eruptions

Fifteen cases with cutaneous reactions to calcium channel blockers (Ca-antagonist), dihydropiridine (including nicardipine, nifedipine, nisoldipine), verapamil, and diltiazem are reported. The patients from Yokohama City University Hospital and affiliated hospitals included 4 males and 11 females with cardiovascular diseases. Their average age was 64.7 (54 to 82) years. They had been taking Ca-antagonists for an average of 95 days (7 days to 10 years) before they developed dermatitis. The frequency of reactions to Ca-antagonists was high with diltiazem (5/16:31.25%) and dihydropyridine (7/16:43.75%), including nifedipine (4/7), nisoldipine (1/7), and nicardipine (2/7). Stevens-Johnson syndrome (MCOS) was associated only with verapamil. A notable type of eruption was the psoriasiform type, including exacerbation of psoriasis, which was resolved or easily controlled after discontinuation of the drug. Provocation tests verified the Ca-antagonist as the cause in 7 cases of psoriasiform eruption. The frequency of positive patch tests to Ca-antagonists was low except for diltiazem. Patch tests with diltiazem showed positive reactions in 54% (7 of 13 patients), based on our experience and papers published in Japan. Ca-antagonists are occasional causes of a wide spectrum of cutaneous reactions and should also be considered as causative factors in patients who develop psoriasiform eruptions or in patients whose psoriasis is exacerbated while using these drugs.

Skin reactions to diltiazem

A survey of Australian dermatologists was conducted into skin reactions observed to diltiazem. These have included: erythema multiforme, subcorneal pustular dermatosis, photosensitive erythroderma, macular exanthem, allergic vasculitis and urticarial vasculitis. The range of clinical and histopathological features are described. A review of the literature is presented. Photosensitive erythroderma and urticarial vasculitis have not, to our knowledge, been reported in the literature previously.

Reports of erythematous macular skin eruptions associated with diltiazem therapy

Diltiazem is a commonly prescribed calcium-channel antagonist for hypertension and ischemic heart disease. The incidence of rash associated with diltiazem therapy is reported to be 1.3 percent. We describe two patients who developed erythematous, macular skin eruptions, approximately two weeks following institution of diltiazem. The skin eruptions resolved after symptomatic treatment and the patients received further therapy with another calcium-channel antagonist. Diltiazem-associated skin eruptions are a rare adverse effect; however, the incidence of rash may occur more frequently than reported in postmarketing surveillance studies.

Cutaneous reaction to diltiazem resulting in an exacerbation of angina

A 77-year-old woman developed a widespread erythematous rash after treatment with the calcium antagonist, diltiazem, which resulted in an exacerbation of the angina for which the drug was originally described. Drugs which may give widespread cutaneous side-effects should be used with caution in patients with compromised cardiac function.