Dermatitis due to intravesical mitomycin C: a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction?

Adverse drug reactions of intravesical instillation therapy for bladder cancer: based on FDA adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

Intravesical chemotherapy and immunotherapy are common adjuvant treatments for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer post-surgery. Analyzing adverse events linked to these therapies, can assist in clinical decision-making and risk assessment.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Disproportionality analysis was conducted to analyze data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database from the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2024, exploring potential positive signals between Bacillus Calmette-Guérin, mitomycin-C, epirubicin, gemcitabine, and adverse events.

RESULTS

The database retrieved 2018, 140, 31, and 85 adverse event reports associated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin, mitomycin-C, epirubicin, and gemcitabine, respectively. Adverse reactions not mentioned in the label, such as aortic aneurysm and ocular congestion, were observed in preferred term level related to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin. Mitomycin-C exhibited specificity in skin and subcutaneous tissue diseases not reflected in the package insert. Gemcitabine-induced adverse drug reactions showed signals in vascular and lymphatic diseases meeting the screening criteria of all 4 indicators, with capillary leakage syndrome being the preferred term with the highest signal intensity.

CONCLUSION

This study observed new adverse event signals, providing important assistance for drug selection in adjuvant therapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer postoperatively.

Systemic allergic dermatitis (systemic contact dermatitis) from pharmaceutical drugs: A review

The literature on systemic allergic dermatitis (SAD; also known as systemic contact dermatitis) is reviewed. Both topical drugs (from absorption through mucosae or skin) and systemic drugs (oral, parenteral, rectal) may be responsible for the disorder. The topical route appears to be rare with 41 culprit topical drugs found to cause SAD in 95 patients. Most reactions are caused by budesonide (especially from inhalation), bufexamac, and dibucaine. SAD from systemic drugs is infrequent with 95 culprit drugs found to cause SAD in 240 patients. The drugs most frequently implicated are mitomycin C, methylprednisolone (salt, ester), and hydrocortisone (salt). The largest group of culprit drugs consisted of corticosteroids (19%), being responsible for >30% of the reactions, of which nearly 40% were not caused by therapeutic drugs, but by drug provocation tests. The most frequent manifestations of SAD from drugs are eczematous eruptions (scattered, widespread, generalized, worsening, reactivation), maculopapular eruptions, symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE [baboon syndrome]) and widespread erythema or erythroderma. Therapeutic systemic drugs hardly ever cause reactivation of previously positive patch tests and infrequently of previous allergic contact dermatitis. The pathophysiology of SAD has received very little attention. Explanations for the rarity of SAD are suggested.

Ocular surface complications of local anticancer drugs for treatment of ocular tumors

Local chemotherapy is increasingly used, either in combination with surgery or as monotherapy, for management of ocular tumors. Yet many of the local chemotherapeutic agents used for ocular tumors are cytotoxic drugs that are frequently associated with toxicities in normal ocular tissues. Understanding and managing these side effects are important because they affect treatment tolerability, outcome and quality of vision. Herein, we review local anticancer drugs administered for the treatment of ocular tumors, with an emphasis on their toxicities to the ocular surface, adnexa and lacrimal drainage system. We provide the underlying mechanisms and management strategies for the ocular side effects. Recent innovations in anticancer immunotherapy and ocular drug delivery systems also are discussed as new potential therapeutic modalities for alleviation of side effects.

UGN-101 (mitomycin gel): a novel treatment for low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare malignancy. The standard treatment for localized high-risk disease is radical nephroureterectomy, which confers significant morbidity and is not appropriate for all patients. Patients harboring low-risk, non-invasive disease may be candidates for organ-sparing treatment, which includes endoscopic resection with or without intracavitary drug therapy. Successful administration of intracavitary chemotherapy to the upper tracts is impeded by rapid washout of the agent and short dwell times. This has limited the clinical utility of mitomycin C for treatment of upper tract tumors, despite the successful outcomes observed in low-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Currently, there is an unmet need for development of a technically feasible and oncologically sound intracavitary therapy for management of low-grade UTUC. UGN-101 (Jelmyto™) is a novel formulation of mitomycin C that uses a unique hydrogel designed to increase urinary dwell time, and thereby efficacy of treatment. Preclinical data demonstrated promising results regarding the safety and feasibility of this agent. Preliminary results of a phase III trial (OLYMPUS study) [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02793128] demonstrated the efficacy of UGN-101 as a successful chemo-ablative agent for low-grade upper tract tumors. UGN-101 may represent a pivotal paradigm shift in the treatment of low-grade UTUC. Indeed, the drug has recently been granted approval by the US Food and Drug Administration as the first treatment for low-grade UTUC, which may lead to significant improvements in patient care and a long-awaited decrease in the burden of disease.

Acute Pericarditis Occurring Three Days after Intravesical Instillation of Mitomycin C after Transurethral Bladder Tumor Resection in a 64-Year-Old Woman

We present a 64-year-old woman who developed symptoms of acute pericarditis three days after undergoing intravesical instillation of mitomycin C following transurethral bladder tumor resection. Mitomycin C is a chemotherapeutic agent which acts by alkylation of DNA and is known to be cardiotoxic when systemically administered. Despite classic pericarditis symptoms, the patient underwent an urgent coronary angiogram due to elevated cardiac troponin I level, EKG changes, and wall motion abnormalities on her echocardiogram. During her angiogram, it was found that she had multiple stenotic coronary artery lesions, with no acute total coronary occlusions, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was done with placement of a single drug-eluting stent for a 95% stenotic lesion in the left anterior descending artery. The patient was discharged after an uneventful hospitalization on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and prasugrel, and colchicine for pericarditis. It is likely that the patient's presentation was the result of a perimyocardial inflammatory process secondary to intravesically administered mitomycin C, rather than an acute coronary syndrome. While the pathophysiological basis of cardiotoxicity of systemically administered mitomycin C is well documented, more studies are needed to determine whether intravesical MMC may cause cardiotoxicity.

Side effects of perioperative intravesical treatment and treatment strategies for these side effects

Perioperative intravesical chemotherapy has a well-established role in the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. There are multiple agents that can be used in this fashion with varying properties. Although chemical cystitis is the most common side effect and is usually self-limiting, significant toxicity can occur with intravesical chemotherapy. It is imperative that the urologist is aware of the acute and delayed side effects of intravesical chemotherapy and how to manage potential complications. Both local and systemic toxicities are discussed, as well as strategies to minimize and manage them.

Drug eruption due to intravesical instillations of both epirubicin and mitomycin C

We present the first patient to develop drug eruption due to intravesical instillations of both epirubicin and mitomycin C. A 58-year-old-man underwent transurethral resection (TUR) for superficial bladder carcinoma followed by instillations of intravesical chemotherapy. Immediately after TUR, the first instillation of epirubicin was performed. Two days after the first instillation, the patient developed generalized erythema of the face, trunk, upper and lower limbs. Two days after the second instillation, the patient developed severe generalized erythema and was diagnosed as having drug eruption due to intravesical instillations of epirubicin by the dermatologist. Instead of epirubicin, mitomycin C was instilled 2 weeks postoperatively. Two days after the first instillation of mitomycin C, the patient again developed severe generalized erythema and was diagnosed as having drug eruption due to intravesical instillation of mitomycin C. Drug eruption after the first instillation of epirubicin might have been due to drug toxicity of the agent. However, drug eruptions after the second instillation of epirubicin and the first instillation of mitomycin C might have been due to allergic reactions to the drugs. The patient has not received any further intravesical chemotherapy and has not demonstrated any such a drug eruption again.

[Hematogenous contact dermatitis after intravesicular instillation of mitomycin C]

Mitomycin C is an alkylating chemotherapeutic agent which is instilled intravesically to prevent recurrence of superficial bladder carcinomas. After several cycles of mitomycin C, our patient developed a pruritic genital dermatitis and palmar desquamation. Following exclusion of a fungal infection, we performed patch tests using the standard series, the major basic ointment ingredients, disinfectants, and mitomycin C in concentrations of 0.001 to 0.1%; the resulting diagnosis was allergic contact dermatitis due to delayed-type hypersensitivity to mitomycin C. The skin rash rapidly resolved with application of topical steroids, and the intravesical chemotherapy was changed to doxorubicin. Eczematous skin reactions are quite common side effects after intravesical instillation of mitomycin C. In the majority of cases, they are caused by delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions, presumably elicited by hematogenous spread of the allergen, and not by irritation. The sensitization most likely occurs via the bladder mucosa. In order to differentiate between allergic and toxic contact dermatitis, patch tests with the above-mentioned mitomycin C concentrations are useful. In cases of mild allergic contact dermatitis the intravesical chemotherapy might be continued with concomitant topical steroids.

Complications of mitomycin C therapy in 100 eyes with ocular surface neoplasia

AIM

To determine the complications associated with mitomycin C (MMC) in the treatment of ocular surface neoplasia.

METHODS

A retrospective and consecutive study of 100 eyes in 91 patients with ocular surface neoplasia treated with MMC in a single centre between November 1998 and January 2005. Outcome measures included complications of MMC and the treatment required for these complications.

RESULTS

One to three 7 day cycles of topical MMC 0.04% four times a day were given to 59 eyes with localised corneal-conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), 19 eyes with diffuse CIN, six eyes with recurrent CIN, one eye with ocular surface squamous cell carcinoma, three eyes with primary acquired melanosis (PAM) with atypia, nine eyes with conjunctival malignant melanoma (MM), two eyes with sebaceous carcinoma with pagetoid spread, and one eye with recurrent atypical fibroxanthoma. Nine patients had bilateral CIN. 31 (34%) cases developed an allergic reaction to MMC and 14 (14%) eyes had epiphora secondary to punctal stenosis at a mean follow up period of 26.5 months.

CONCLUSION

In the largest study looking at complications of topical MMC in the treatment of ocular surface neoplasia, allergic reaction and punctal stenosis are relatively common. Serious complications were not observed suggesting the safe use of MMC in mid-term follow up.

Diagnosis and management of superficial bladder cancer

Bladder cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer in American men, accounting for more than 12,000 deaths annually. It was one of the first malignancies in which carcinogens were recognized as an important factor in its cause. Currently, cigarette smoking is by far the most common cause of bladder cancer, although occupational exposure to arylamines has been implicated in the past. Gross or microscopic hematuria is the most common sign at presentation. Initial radiologic evaluation usually includes the excretory urography (intravenous pyelography), although further evaluation of the renal parenchyma with ultrasound or computed tomography scanning has been advocated by some. These radiologic studies are unable to provide adequate bladder imaging, and thus cystoscopy is required for the diagnosis of bladder cancer. Most bladder cancers present as "superficial" disease, confined to the bladder mucosa or submucosal layer, without muscle invasion. Superficial tumors consist of papillary tumors that are mucosally confined (Ta), papillary or sessile tumors extending into the lamina propria (T1), and carcinoma in situ, which occurs as "flat" mucosal dysplasia, which can be focal, diffuse, or associated with a papillary or sessile tumor. The natural history of these pathologic subtypes differ significantly. Most superficial tumors (60% to 70%) have a propensity for recurrence after transurethral resection. Some (15% to 25%) are at high risk for progression to muscle invasion. Most superficial tumors can be stratified into high- or low-risk groups depending on tumor stage, grade, size, number, and recurrence pattern. It is important to identify those tumors at risk for recurrence or progression so that adjuvant intravesical therapies can be instituted. Many intravesical chemotherapeutic agents have been shown to reduce tumor recurrence when used in conjunction with transurethral tumor resection. Unfortunately, however, none of these agents have proved to be of benefit in preventing disease progression. Most are given intravesically on a weekly basis, although many studies suggest that a single instillation immediately after transurethral resection may be as good as a longer course of therapy. Although all of these drugs have toxicity, they usually are well tolerated. Intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is an immunotherapeutic agent that when given intravesically is very effective in the treatment of superficial transitional cell carcinoma. Compared with controls, BCG has a 43% advantage in preventing tumor recurrence, a significantly better rate than the 16% to 21% advantage of intravesical chemotherapy. In addition, BCG is particularly effective in the treatment of carcinoma in situ, eradicating it in more than 80% of cases. In contrast to intravesical chemotherapy, BCG has also been shown to decrease the risk of tumor progression. The optimal course of BCG appears to be a 6-week course of weekly instillations, followed by a 3-week course at 3 months in those tumors that do not respond. In high-risk cancers, maintenance BCG administered for 3 weeks every 6 months may be optimal in limiting recurrence and preventing progression. Unfortunately, adverse effects associated with this prolonged therapy may limit its widespread applicability. In those patients at high risk in whom BCG therapy fails, intravesical interferon-alpha with or without BCG may be beneficial in some. Photodynamic therapy has also been used but is limited by its toxicity. In patients who progress or do not respond to intravesical therapies, cystectomy should be considered. With the development of orthotopic lower urinary tract reconstruction to the native urethra, the quality of life impact of radical cystectomy has been lessened.

Mucocutaneous reactions to chemotherapy

Chemotherapeutic agents are a widely used treatment modality. Side effects range from common to unusual and may be confused with other cutaneous sequelae of oncologic treatment. The goal of this communication is to elaborate on previous descriptions of the cutaneous manifestations of chemotherapeutic treatment and to discuss more recent findings.

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

At the conclusion of this learning activity, participants should be able to generate a differential diagnosis of possible etiologies for varying patterns of cutaneous involvement in patients receiving chemotherapy and identify the various cutaneous side effects of chemotherapeutic treatment. In addition, they should be able to distinguish life-threatening side effects that require immediate management from more benign manifestations of chemotherapeutic treatment.

Adverse cutaneous reactions to chemotherapeutic agents and cytokine therapy

This article reviews the adverse cutaneous reactions to antineoplastic chemotherapeutic agents and cytokine therapy. The article details specific reactions such as acral erythemas and flushing reactions. It also discusses nonspecific reactions with specific histological features such as neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis and syringosquamous metaplasia. The wide variety of cutaneous reactions to cytokine therapy such as from recombinant interleukins and the colony stimulating factors are reviewed.

The cutaneous histopathology of chemotherapeutic reactions

The histological diagnosis of chemotherapy-induced cutaneous reactions is a difficult problem for the dermatopathologist. The initial effort should be directed towards obtaining as much clinical history as possible since the provided information is often incomplete and clinical correlation is usually required. The biopsy should be examined in a systematic fashion to assess the presence of damage to specific cutaneous structures. A recommended approach is to initially examine the epidermis and then proceed to hair follicles, eccrine sweat glands, vessels and dermis. The degree and pattern of damage will usually indicate whether or not a cytotoxic reaction is present. The intensity, pattern, and components of the inflammatory response should be assessed since they provide clues to whether a hypersensitivity reaction or immunomodulating chemotherapeutic reaction is present. In addition to the possibility of a chemotherapeutic reaction, the dermatopathologist must also consider the possibility of an infection since the host is usually immunocompromised and must also exclude the presence of a residual malignancy. After examination of the biopsy specimen and determination of the pathologic process or precesses, the observed findings should be correlated with the clinical history before rendering an interpretation.

Systemic allergic contact dermatitis from intravesical instillation of the antitumor antibiotic mitomycin C

6 cases of contact allergy to the antitumor antibiotic mitomycin C from intravesical instillation are described. Reports suggest that up to 9% of patients treated with mitomycin C for chemoresection/prevention of superficial bladder cancer will develop cutaneous side-effects. Patients may present either with vesicular dermatitis of the hands and feet and/or dermatitis of the genitals, or with more widespread eruptions. Probably most, if not all, skin reactions are caused by contact allergy. The distribution is suggestive of systemic contact dermatitis from mitomycin C absorbed from the vesical mucosa.