The incidence of factor VIII inhibitors in the United Kingdom, 1990-93. Inhibitor Working Party. United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Directors Organization

Prevalence of factor VIII inhibitors among Afghan patients with hemophilia A: a first report

: Prevalence of inhibitors in Afghan hemophilia patients has not been reported previously. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of factor VIII inhibitors among hemophilia A patients from the Kabul province of Afghanistan to identify and characterize the pattern of inhibitor formation. Clinical information and blood samples were collected from three hemophilia centers in Kabul, Afghanistan. Plasma samples were obtained from 62 patients with severe (80.5%) and 15 patients with moderate hemophilia A (19.5%) in this cross-sectional study design. All the patients were receiving on-demand treatment. The Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay was used to detect inhibitors. Multiplex PCR, inverse-PCR, Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and direct sequencing were performed for genotyping. Inhibitor activity was detected in one out of 15 (6.7%) patients with moderate hemophilia and in six out of 62 (9.7%) with severe disease. Apart from the intron 22 inversion, five different mutations including one missense, two large and two small deletions were detected. This is the first report showing that the prevalence of inhibitors in Afghan hemophilia A patients is much lower than in other populations.

Large scale studies assessing anti-factor VIII antibody development in previously untreated haemophilia A: what has been learned, what to believe and how to learn more

Minimizing the risk of inhibitor development by acting on modifiable risk factors remains a sensible goal for treatment optimization in haemophilia A. By critically appraising published studies assessing inhibitor development, this review addresses the role of studies in previously untreated patients (PUPs) for establishing the immunogenicity of new concentrates, suggest novel research design to be adopted in future studies and discuss clinical practice implications of the reported differential immunogenicity of Kogenate Bayer and Advate factor VIII concentrates. Three considerations are relevant here: (i) all of the existing concentrates, when tested following the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee recommendation, were shown to be safe; as a consequence, (ii) when considering using any newly introduced product, one should be aware that it could, in future, turn out to be as immunogenic as Kogenate Bayer, and (iii) at the population level, it might be wiser not to use Kogenate Bayer in PUPs, if the choice is against Advate. When presenting the risk of developing inhibitors to the individual patient (or their family), the message remains that the risk can be as high as 40%, without any efficient instrument to predict individual inhibitor risk. Patients should be invited to enrol into a randomized registry trial, including random assignment to trials with new investigational products.

Recommendations for authors of manuscripts reporting inhibitor cases developed in previously treated patients with hemophilia: communication from the SSC of the ISTH

Aim The scope of this recommendation is to provide guidance for reporting of inhibitor cases in previously treated patients (PTPs) with hemophilia A. This guidance is intended to improve transparency and completeness of reporting of observed events; it does not cover planning, executing or analyzing original studies aimed at the assessment of inhibitor rates. Recommendation We recommend that for each case of inhibitor development reported in a published paper, a paragraph or a table is included in the main publication reporting as a minimum the underlined data fields in Table . We recommend transparent reporting when any of the suggested information is not available. We recommend that particular care is used in reporting the timeline of events by clearly identifying a reference time-point. We suggest that journals in the field adopt this guidance as instructions for the authors and as a guide for reviewers. Conclusion Development of inhibitors in PTPs is a very rare event. Standardized reporting of inhibitor characteristics will contribute to generating a body of evidence otherwise not available. Case by case reporting of the recommended data elements may shed light on the natural history and risk factors of inhibitor development in PTPs and be useful for tailoring care in similar future cases.

Joint WFH-ISTH session: issues in clinical trial design

Haemophilia therapy is experiencing an unprecedented expansion in the number and novelty of clotting factor concentrates. Every product must be licensed by regulatory authorities, primarily on the basis of its safety and efficacy profiles. The low prevalence of haemophilia, and other inherited bleeding disorders, presents a significant challenge to patient recruitment for preauthorization clinical trials, especially given the low frequency of inhibitory antibodies, the major adverse event related to clotting factor exposure. Other challenges include a lack of harmonization between the major regulatory authorities in certain key areas, the selection of laboratory monitoring methodologies and the difficulty in obtaining high-quality phase IV safety data following authorization. These aspects will be reviewed in this session, which will also highlight the roles played by the World Federation of Hemophilia and International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis in the promotion of these discussions.

Clotting factor concentrate switching and inhibitor development in hemophilia A

The development of alloantibodies or inhibitors is the most serious complication a patient with severe hemophilia can experience from treatment with clotting factor concentrates. Although common in previously untreated patients, inhibitor development is rare in multiply exposed, well-tolerized patients. There has been a nonevidence-based reluctance to change concentrate because of a perceived greater inhibitor risk after the switch, even though most patients are now likely to be using a concentrate on which they did not begin. Inhibitors in previously treated patients are observed in approximately 2 per 1000 patient/years, which makes it difficult to study and compare rates among different products. Because the baseline inhibitor risk in previously treated patients may vary over time, it is important to compare the risk in patients switching to a new product with that in a parallel control group of nonswitching patients or within a case-controlled study. The study designs imposed by regulators are suboptimal in detecting immunogenicity signals. The issue of immunogenicity of new products is likely to gain more relevance in the near future, with a call for effective postmarketing surveillance studies for all of the new engineered factor VIII concentrates with prolonged half-lives that are likely to enter clinical practice.

Low risk of inhibitor formation in haemophilia A patients following en masse switch in treatment to a third generation full length plasma and albumin-free recombinant factor VIII product (ADVATE®)

Previous studies have suggested that development of inhibitors in previously treated patients (PTPs) may be attributable to a switch in factor VIII (FVIII) therapeutic product. Consequently, it is widely recognized that inhibitor development must be assessed in PTPs following the introduction of any new FVIII product. Following a national tender process in 2006, all patients with haemophilia A in Ireland changed their FVIII treatment product en masse to a plasma and albumin-free recombinant full-length FVIII product (ADVATE(®)). In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the case records of Irish PTPs to evaluate risk of inhibitor formation following this treatment switch. One hundred and thirteen patients participated in the study. Most patients (89%) had severe haemophilia. Only one of 96 patients with no inhibitor history developed an inhibitor. Prior to the switch in his recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) treatment of choice, this child had only experienced three exposure days (EDs). Consequently, in total he had only received 6 EDs when his inhibitor was first diagnosed. In keeping with this lack of de novo inhibitor development, we observed no evidence of any recurrent inhibitor formation in any of 16 patients with previously documented inhibitors. Similarly, following a previous en masse switch, we have previously reported that changing from a Chinese hamster ovary cell-produced to a baby hamster kidney cell-produced rFVIII was also associated with a low risk of inhibitor formation in PTPs. Our cumulative findings from these two studies clearly emphasizes that the risk of inhibitor development for PTPs following changes in commercial rFVIII product is low, at least in the Irish population.

The epidemiology of factor VIII inhibitors

Risk factors for inhibitor development include specific factor VIII (FVIII) genotypes, a family history of inhibitor development amongst first-degree relatives, certain HLA haplotypes and non-caucasian ethnicity. Patients with major FVIII deletions or rearrangements have a higher risk of inhibitor development than those with small deletions or missense mutations. Studies of HLA-DR amongst northern European patients with the intron 22 inversion indicate that certain HLA haplotypes may also confer either increased or decreased inhibitor risk. However, although brothers of patients with inhibitor have a high risk of inhibitor development, concordance is not 100%, and other constitutional factors must also operate. Disputed risk factors for inhibitor development include early age at first FVIII exposure, the use of recombinant rather than plasma-derived FVIII and product switching. Two studies suggest that inhibitor risk is increased by very early FVIII exposure (P = 0.03), but this is disputed by a third study; larger studies addressing the question are ongoing. Studies investigating the relative inhibitor risk of plasma-derived vs. recombinant FVIII have been similarly inconclusive and will be reviewed. Other environmental or treatment variables such as concomitant infection or vaccination are suspected to influence inhibitor risk but have not yet been fully investigated.

Impact of Choice of Treatment for Bleeding Episodes on Inhibitor Outcome in Patients With Mild/Moderate Hemophilia A and Inhibitors

Patients with mild/moderate hemophilia A (MHA) may develop inhibitors to factor VIII (FVIII). In this condition, FVIII clotting activity (FVIII:C) baseline levels may remain stable for some patients, but may be reduced to less than 0.01 U/mL for others. Several risk factors for the development of inhibitors in MHA have been proposed. Genetic factors, such as mutations in the FVIII gene, may play a central role; however, other influences, such as intensive treatment with FVIII products, may also be important. Optimal treatment regimens have yet to be determined, not only for the eradication of inhibitors, but also for the management or surgical prophylaxis of hemorrhages associated with this condition. Several treatment options for the control of bleeding in patients with MHA and inhibitors (MHAI) are currently available, and the choice of therapeutic strategy should be given careful consideration; some treatments may produce an anamnestic response, thus delaying the return to FVIII:C baseline levels and adversely affecting the duration of the severe bleeding phenotype. To increase our knowledge of MHAI, a retrospective collection of data is currently being performed among hemophilia centers in France and Belgium. Based on five examples of patients with MHAI collated from preliminary study data, we illustrate the impact on inhibitor outcome of the therapeutic choices used to treat bleeding episodes in these patients.

Heterogeneity of the immune response to adenovirus-mediated factor VIII gene therapy in different inbred hemophilic mouse strains

BACKGROUND

The development of anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies (inhibitors) is a critical concern when considering gene therapy as a potential treatment modality for hemophilia A. We used a hemophilia A mouse model bred on different genetic backgrounds to explore genetically controlled differences in the immune response to FVIII gene therapy.

METHODS

C57BL/6 FVIII knockout (C57-FVIIIKO) mice were bred with normal BALB/c (BAL) mice, to generate a recombinant congenic BAL-FVIIIKO model of hemophilia A. Early generation adenoviral (Ad) vectors containing the canine FVIII B-domain-deleted transgene under the control of either the CMV promoter or a tissue-restricted (TR) promoter were administered to C57-FVIIIKO, C57xBAL(F1)-FVIIIKO crosses, and BAL-FVIIIKO mice. FVIII expression, inhibitor development, inflammation, and vector-mediated toxicity were assessed.

RESULTS

In response to administration of Ad-CMV-cFVIII, C57-FVIIIKO mice attain 3-fold higher levels of FVIII expression than BAL-FVIIIKO. All strains injected with Ad-CMV-FVIII displayed FVIII expression lasting only 2 weeks, with associated inhibitor development. C57-FVIII-KO mice that received Ad-TR-FVIII expressed FVIII for 12 months post-injection, whereas FVIII expression was limited to 1 week in C57xBAL(F1)-FVIIIKO and BAL-FVIIIKO mice. This loss of expression was associated with anti-FVIII inhibitor development. BAL-FVIIIKO mice showed increased hepatotoxicity with alanine aminotransferase levels reaching 4-fold higher levels than C57-FVIIIKO mice. However, C57-FVIIIKO mice initiate a more rapid and effective cell-mediated clearance of virally transduced cells than BAL-FVIIIKO, as evidenced by real-time PCR analysis of transduced tissues. Overall, strain-dependent differences in the immune response to FVIII gene delivery were only noted in the adaptive response, and not in the innate response.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the genetic background of the murine model of hemophilia A influences FVIII expression levels, the development of anti-FVIII inhibitors, clearance of transduced cells, and the severity of vector-mediated hepatotoxicity.

The incidence of factor VIII and factor IX inhibitors in the hemophilia population of the UK and their effect on subsequent mortality, 1977-99

BACKGROUND

Previous studies of the development of inhibitors and their impact on mortality have been small.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the development of inhibitors in people with hemophilia in the UK and their effect on subsequent mortality.

PATIENTS

6078 males with hemophilia A and 1172 males with hemophilia B registered in the UK Haemophilia Centre Doctors' Organisation database, 1977-98.

RESULTS

In severe hemophilia A inhibitors developed at rates of 34.4, 5.2 and 3.8 per 1000 years at ages <5, 5-14 and 15+years; cumulative risks at ages 5 and 75 were 16% and 36%. In hemophilia A the rate of inhibitor development decreased during 1977-90, but increased during the 1990s. In severe hemophilia B inhibitors developed at rates of 13.3 and 0.2 per 1000 years at ages <5 and 5+ and cumulative risks at ages 5 and 75 were 6% and 8%. With HIV, inhibitor development did not increase mortality. In severe hemophilia without HIV, inhibitor development doubled mortality during 1977-92, but during 1993-99 mortality was identical with and without inhibitors. In severe hemophilia without HIV but with inhibitors, mortality from causes involving bleeding decreased during 1977-99 (P = 0.001) as did mortality involving intracranial hemorrhage (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide estimates of the rate of inhibitor development in hemophilia A and hemophilia B, and they show that the rate of inhibitor development has varied over time, although the reasons for this remain unclear. They also show that in severe hemophilia the substantial increase in mortality previously associated with inhibitors is no longer present.

Clinical Evaluation of a Recombinant Factor VIII Preparation (Kogenate) in Previously Untreated Patients with Hemophilia A

The safety and efficacy of a recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) preparation (Kogenate) for the treatment of bleeding episodes was studied in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe, moderate, and mild hemophilia A. Patient peripheral blood samples taken at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after the first infusion were evaluated for FVIII inhibitor antibodies by the Bethesda assay, for antibodies formed against trace proteins derived from the rFVIII production process, and for general changes in laboratory test results. Samples for general laboratory testing were also drawn every 6 months after the first 24 months. Hemostatic efficacy was assessed by physicians, and adverse events were recorded throughout the study period. Forty-three PUPs (30 with FVIII:C <1%; 10 with FVIII:C 1%-5%; and 3 with FVIII:C >5%) aged 3 months to 32 years were enrolled at 33 centers in Japan. Patients were studied for a mean of 51 months (range, 11-80 months), and the mean exposure time was 83 days (range, 2-571 days). The incidence of occurrence of FVIII inhibitors was 34.9% (high responders [> or = 10 Bethesda U/mL], 11.6%; low responders [0.5-<10 Bethesda U/mL], 23.3%). The median cumulative exposure time of inhibitor detection was 12 days, indicating inhibitor development at an early stage after the start of infusion of this preparation. Hemostasis was achieved with a single dose of Kogenate in 94.8% of the 951 bleeding episodes recorded in the study. Transient increases in antibodies against baby hamster kidney proteins and antimouse immunoglobulin G were observed in 14.0% and 18.6% of patients, respectively. Anti-rFVIII seroconversion was observed in 18.6% of patients and only in patients with inhibitor antibodies. Antibody responses to trace proteins were not correlated with drug-related adverse events with the exception of FVIII activity inhibition in PUPs with anti-rFVIII seroconversion. These data indicate that Kogenate is safe and effective for the treatment of bleeding in PUPs with hemophilia A.

The epidemiology of inhibitors in haemophilia A: a systematic review

This paper emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between the prevalence, incidence and cumulative incidence of inhibitors in haemophilia A. Incidence and cumulative incidence data will include patients with transient inhibitors or whose inhibitors have been eliminated by treatment. As these will not be included in prevalence data, prevalence studies will tend to give rise to lower figures than incidence studies. As a result, the most accurate estimates of the true risk of inhibitor development comes from prospective studies of newly diagnosed haemophiliacs who are tested regularly for the presence of inhibitors. This paper reports a systematic review of the best available evidence relating to the epidemiology of inhibitors in haemophilia A. Cohort studies, registry data reporting incidence or prevalence of inhibitors in patients with haemophilia A, and prospective studies of factor VIII (FVIII) in the treatment of previously untreated patients which reported the development of inhibitors as an outcome, were included in the review. The overall prevalence of inhibitors in unselected haemophiliac populations was found to be 5-7%. The cumulative risk of inhibitor development varied (0-39%). Incidence and prevalence were substantially higher in patients with severe haemophilia. Studies of patients using a single plasma-derived FVIII (pdFVIII) preparation reported lower inhibitor incidence than those using multiple pdFVIII preparations or single recombinant FVIII preparations. Incidence data should be used to estimate the likely demand for treatments aimed at eliminating inhibitors, whereas the best estimates of the overall burden to the National Health Service (NHS) of treating bleeding episodes in patients with continuing inhibitors will come from prevalence studies.

Purity of factor VIII product and incidence of inhibitors in previously untreated patients with haemophilia A

It has been suggested that ultrapure clotting factor products carry a greater risk for inhibitor development in patients with haemophilia. We compared the incidence of inhibitors in 59 previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia (endogenous factor VIII < 0.01 U L-1) A, who were initially treated with cryoprecipitate or intermediate purified products, with that in 22 patients exclusively treated with monoclonally purified and recombinant factor VIII. Persistent inhibitors were those with 1 Bethesda unit per mL or more, on more than one occasion, combined with a decrease in recovery. Incidences of persistent inhibitors were 17% (10/59) for patients who were treated with cryoprecipitate or intermediate-purity products and 9% (2/10) for monoclonally purified and recombinant factor VIII. Transient inhibitors appeared to develop earlier during treatment with ultrapure products as compared to treatment with intermediate/low-purity products. In conclusion, ultrapure products appear not to carry a higher risk for inhibitor development.

The impact of inhibitors on the cost of clotting factor replacement therapy in Haemophilia A in Canada

A retrospective case controlled study was performed to determine the comparative costs of clotting factor concentrate therapy for haemophilia A patients with and without inhibitors. We examined treatment records for a 3.5-year period for nine patients with factor VIII inhibitors and nine noninhibitor control patients matched for age and severity of disease. Inhibitor patients used FEIBA, porcine factor VIII, recombinant factor VIIa, and recombinant factor VIII over the study period. Controls used recombinant factor VIII and small amounts of monoclonal antibody purified plasma-derived factor VIII and DDAVP. The total and mean cost for treating the nine inhibitor patients was 2.25-fold greater than the cost for treating the controls. However, in six of the nine pairs the replacement product costs were actually less for the control patient than for the inhibitor patient, and the median cost of concentrates was comparable in the two groups (CDN$150 686 and $133 342 for inhibitor and control patients, respectively). This discrepancy was largely accounted for by a single inhibitor patient who required frequent hospitalizations for severe bleeding episodes. This individual, who did not receive an immune tolerance protocol, accounted for 62% of the total costs for the entire inhibitor group. In summary, over the study period the cost of haemostatic therapy for most inhibitor patients did not exceed that of control patients. However, due to the high per-unit cost of the products used to treat inhibitor patients, the effect of individual outliers greatly magnifies the overall costs of treating patients with this complication.