Management of thrombocytopenia in neonates

Thrombocytopenia in Neonates

Thrombocytopenia defined as platelet count below 150,000/μL is not an uncommon event at the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). In our region we calculated a prevalence of nearly 2 of 1000 live births. Early-onset neonatal thrombocytopenia (NT) occurring within the first 72 hours of life is more common than late-onset NT. Preterm infants are affected more often than term infants and bacterial infection is the most common diagnosis associated with NT. There are a lot of maternal, perinatal, and neonatal causes associated with NT and complications include bleedings with potentially life-threatening intracranial hemorrhage. Alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT) often presents with severe thrombocytopenia (<30,000/μL) in otherwise healthy newborns and needs careful evaluation regarding HPA-1a antigen status and HLA typing. Platelet transfusions are needed in severe NT and threshold platelet counts might be at ≤25,000/μL irrespective of bleeding or not. Immune mediated NT recovers within 2 weeks with a good prognosis when there happened no intracranial hemorrhage. This short review gives an overview on etiology and causes of NT and recommendations regarding platelet transfusions.

Neonatal thrombocytopenia-causes and outcomes following platelet transfusions

We evaluated the causes for neonatal thrombocytopenia (NT), the duration of NT, and the indications of platelet transfusions (PT) by means of a retrospective cohort study over a 23-year period. Neonates with NT were identified via ICD-10 code D69.6. Of 371 neonates (1.8/1000 live births) with NT, the majority (312; 84.1%) had early onset thrombocytopenia, and 282 (76%) were preterm born. The most frequent causes for NT were early and late onset sepsis and asphyxia. The mean duration of thrombocytopenia was 10.2 days and was negatively correlated (KK = - 0.35) with the number of PT. PT were given to 78 (21%) neonates, 38 (49%) of whom had very severe NT. The duration of NT was positively related to the severity of NT and the number of subsequent PT. A mortality rate of 10.8% was significantly associated with bleeding signs (p < 0.05) and correlated with increasing number of PT (p < 0.05) but not with the severity of NT (p = 0.4). In the case of relevant hemorrhage, PT did not influence the mortality rate (p = 0.09). All deaths followed neonatal sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Prematurity and diagnoses including early and late onset sepsis and asphyxia were the most common causes of NT. Mortality was not associated with the severity of NT but increased with the number of PT. What is Known: • The causes for neonatal thrombocytopenia (NT) are well known. • The effects of platelet transfusions (PT) and its indications are still a matter of debate and recommendations differ widely. What is New: • The duration of NT is positively related to the severity of NT and the number of subsequent PT. • The mortality rate is not associated with the severity of NT but increases with increasing numbers of PT and in the case of relevant intraventricular hemorrhage (≥ grade II), PT does not influence the mortality rate.

Thrombocytopenia and platelet transfusion in the neonate

Neonatal thrombocytopenia is widespread in preterm and term neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units, with up to one-third of infants demonstrating platelet counts <150 × 10(9)/L. Thrombocytopenia may arise from maternal, placental or fetal/neonatal origins featuring decreased platelet production, increased consumption, or both mechanisms. Over the past years, innovations in managing neonatal thrombocytopenia were achieved from prospectively obtained clinical data on thrombocytopenia and bleeding events, animal studies on platelet life span and production rate and clinical use of fully automated measurement of reticulated platelets (immature platelet fraction). This review summarizes the pathophysiology of neonatal thrombocytopenia, current management including platelet transfusion thresholds and recent developments in megakaryopoietic agents. Furthermore, we propose a novel index score for bleeding risk in thrombocytopenic neonates to facilitate clinician's decision-making when to transfuse platelets.

Platelet transfusions in neonates: practices in the United States vary significantly from those in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland

BACKGROUND

Thrombocytopenia affects 20% to 35% of patients admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Platelet (PLT) transfusions are usually administered to neonates with thrombocytopenia at higher thresholds than those used for older children or adults, although there is a paucity of evidence to guide these decisions.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this study, we used a Web-based survey to investigate the PLT transfusion thresholds used in Level 1 NICUs (equivalent to Level 3 in the US) in three European countries (Austria, Germany, and Switzerland [AUT/GER/SUI]). This survey was identical to the one that was previously sent to US neonatologists, thus allowing for a direct comparison of their responses to 11 case-based scenarios.

RESULTS

In nine of the scenarios, AUT/GER/SUI neonatologists selected substantially lower PLT transfusion thresholds than US neonatologists (p < 0.0001). Transfusion thresholds were more similar when treating neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia and before invasive procedures. The clinical impact of these differences was estimated by extrapolating the AUT/GER/SUI versus the US answers to a cohort of neonates with a birth weight below 1000 g. This suggested that, in AUT/GER/SUI, these neonates would receive 167 PLT transfusions per 1000 infants, compared to 299 PLT transfusions in the United States.

CONCLUSION

This first international comparative survey on PLT transfusion practice in neonates reveals substantially higher transfusion thresholds in the United States than in AUT/GER/SUI. Well-designed clinical studies are needed to address the risks and/or benefits of these different approaches.

Prospective, observational study of outcomes in neonates with severe thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVE

A cross-sectional, observational study of outcomes for neonates with severe neonatal thrombocytopenia (SNT; platelet count of <60 x 10(9) platelets per L) was performed to examine hemorrhage and use of platelet transfusions.

METHODS

Neonates who were admitted to 7 NICUs and developed SNT were enrolled for daily data collection.

RESULTS

Among 3652 neonatal admissions, 194 neonates (5%) developed SNT. The median gestational age of 169 enrolled neonates was 27 weeks (interquartile range [IQR]: 24-32 weeks), and the median birth weight was 822 g (IQR: 670-1300 g). Platelet count nadirs were <20 x 10(9), 20 to 39 x 10(9), and 40 to 59 x 10(9) platelets per L for 58 (34%), 64 (39%), and 47 (28%) of all enrolled infants, respectively. During the study, 31 infants (18%) had no recorded hemorrhage, 123 (73%) developed minor hemorrhage, and 15 (9%) developed major hemorrhage. Thirteen (87%) of 15 episodes of major hemorrhage occurred in neonates with gestational ages of <28 weeks. Platelet transfusions (n = 415) were administered to 116 infants (69%); for 338 (81%) transfusions, the main recorded reason was low platelet count. Transfusions increased the platelet count from a median of 27 x 10(9) platelets per L (IQR: 19-36 x 10(9) platelets per L) to 79 x 10(9) platelets per L (IQR: 47.5-127 x 10(9) platelets per L).

CONCLUSIONS

Although one third of neonates enrolled in this study developed thrombocytopenia of <20 x 10(9) platelets per L, 91% did not develop major hemorrhage. Most platelet transfusions were given to neonates with thrombocytopenia with no bleeding or minor bleeding only.

Platelets, frozen plasma, and cryoprecipitate: what is the clinical evidence for their use in the neonatal intensive care unit?

Transfusion of blood components such as platelets, frozen plasma, and cryoprecipitate is a common practice in the neonatal intensive care unit. Although it is intuitive that these components would be transfused in the context of bleeding, their use in neonatology has often been on a prophylactic basis. Due to a lack of consensus guidelines regarding indications for transfusion, however, the neonatologist is left to his/her opinion as to when to transfuse. This article seeks to review the available evidence regarding the use of platelets, frozen plasma, and cryoprecipitate in neonates, as well as the risks associated with the administration of these products.

Platelet transfusion practices among neonatologists in the United States and Canada: results of a survey

OBJECTIVE

In the absence of scientific evidence, current neonatal platelet transfusion practices are based on physicians' preferences, expert advice, or consensus-driven recommendations. We hypothesized that there would be significant diversity in platelet transfusion triggers, product selection, and dosing among neonatologists in the United States and Canada.

METHODS

A Web-based survey on neonatal platelet transfusion practices was distributed to all members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Perinatal Section in the United States and to all physicians listed in the 2005 Canadian Neonatology Directory.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 37% (1060 of 2875). In the United States, 37% (1007 of 2700) responded, of which 52% practiced at academic centers. Thirty percent (53 of 175) of Canadians responded, of whom 94% practiced at academic centers. As hypothesized, there was significant practice diversity in both countries. The survey also revealed that platelet transfusions are frequently administered to nonbleeding neonates with platelet counts of >50 x 10(9)/L. This practice is particularly prevalent among neonates with specific clinical conditions, including indomethacin treatment, preceding procedures, in the postoperative period, or with intraventricular hemorrhages.

CONCLUSIONS

There is great variability in platelet transfusion practices among US and Canadian neonatologists, suggesting clinical equipoise in many clinical scenarios. Prospective randomized clinical trials to generate evidence-based neonatal platelet transfusion guidelines are needed.

Advances in the management of alloimmune thrombocytopenia

There have been considerable advances in the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of alloimmune thrombocytopenia (AIT), and its postnatal and antenatal management. The antenatal management of AIT has been particularly problematic, because severe haemorrhage occurs as early as 16 weeks gestation and there is no non-invasive investigation that reliably predicts the severity of AIT in utero. The strategies for antenatal treatment have included the use of serial platelet transfusions that, while effective, are invasive and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Maternal therapy involving the administration of intravenous immunoglobulin and/or steroids is also effective and associated with fewer risks to the fetus. Significant recent progress has involved refinement of maternal treatment, stratifying it according to the likely severity of AIT based on the history in previous pregnancies. However, the ideal antenatal treatment, which is effective without causing significant side-effects to the mother or fetus, has yet to be determined, and further clinical trials are needed.

Evaluation and treatment of severe and prolonged thrombocytopenia in neonates

Thrombocytopenia is one of the most common hematologic problems in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Despite its prevalence,several basic pathophysiologic questions remain unanswered. For instance, there is a lack of evidence-based guidelines for treatment,and the kinetic mechanisms (decreased platelet production,increased platelet consumption, or sequestration) responsible for most varieties of neonatal thrombocytopenia are not well defined.Moreover, a clear correlation between degree of thrombocytopenia and the resulting bleeding risk has not been demonstrated, and no transfusion-trigger studies have been conducted in neonates. As a consequence of these deficiencies in knowledge, there is great variability in platelet transfusion practices among NICUs. This article presents an overview of the evaluation of a neonate with severe thrombocytopenia and a review of current and projected therapeutic options.

Alloimmune thrombocytopenia in the fetus: current management theories

Fetal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (AIT) affects only a small number of fetuses but the consequences may be devastating. Outcomes range from mild thrombocytopenia without signs or symptoms to intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and fetal or neonatal death. Antenatal screening is available but not used routinely in the United States. The most frequent method of AIT identification is its diagnosis in the neonatal period (index neonate). AIT may be diagnosed antenatally if an ICH is noted on routine obstetric ultrasound. There are accurate predictors of AIT, as well as antenatal therapies, to prevent the occurrence of severe disease and ICH.

Inter-NICU variation in rates and management of thrombocytopenia among very low birth-weight infants

OBJECTIVES

To investigate variation among neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in prevalence and management of thrombocytopenia in infants <1500 g.

STUDY DESIGN

In total 1283 infants &<1500 g admitted to six NICUs over 21 months were prospectively analyzed. Illness severity was measured by the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP). Platelet counts in the first 12 hours after birth and on day 3 of life were abstracted from the infants' medical records. Thrombocytopenia was determined from the lowest platelet count in each of these time periods.

RESULTS

There was variability in rates of thrombocytopenia among NICUs, even after controlling for risk factors (e.g., SNAP, small for gestational (SGA) age and maternal hypertension). One site had a high prevalence of thrombocytopenia, but the lowest percentage of infants with thrombocytopenia who received platelet transfusions. After controlling for SNAP, GA, SGA, Apgar score and incidence of thrombocytopenia, the odds of receiving platelets at this site, relative to the site with the highest transfusion rate, was 0.10 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.43).

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter study finds a 10-fold variation among NICU in the administration of platelets to their thrombocytopenic infants that cannot be explained by presence of thrombocytopenia or illness severity.

Evaluation and treatment of thrombocytopenia in the neonatal intensive care unit

Phlebotomy-induced anaemia excepted, thrombocytopenia is the most common haematological abnormality in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients. Roughly one-quarter of all NICU patients and half of all sick preterm neonates develop thrombocytopenia. Whereas a large number of varied precipitating conditions has been identified, early-onset thrombocytopenia (<72 h) is most commonly associated with fetomaternal conditions complicated by placental insufficiency and/or fetal hypoxia, e.g. maternal pre-eclampsia and fetal intrauterine growth restriction. The resulting neonatal thrombocytopenia is usually mild to moderate, resolves spontaneously and requires no specific therapy. Deviation from this pattern of thrombocytopenia suggests the presence of more significant precipitating conditions. The most important of these are the immune thrombocytopenias, and every NICU should develop investigation and treatment protocols to manage these cases promptly and avoid unnecessary risk of haemorrhage. In contrast, late-onset thrombocytopenia (>72 h) is almost always associated with sepsis or necrotizing enterocolitis and the associated thrombocytopenia is severe, prolonged and often requires treatment by platelet transfusion. Unfortunately, evidence-based guidelines for platelet transfusion therapy in NICU patients are currently unavailable, making it difficult to define widely accepted thresholds for transfusion and leading to a significant variation in transfusion practice between centres.

CONCLUSION

While improving this situation remains a pressing need, the growing evidence that impaired megakaryocytopoiesis and platelet production are major contributors to many neonatal thrombocytopenias suggests that recombinant haemopoietic growth factors, including thrombopoietin and interleukin-11, may be useful future therapies to ameliorate neonatal thrombocytopenia.

Thrombocytopenia in the newborn

Thrombocytopenia remains a common problem in sick newborns. A quarter of all neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units develop thrombocytopenia, and in 20% of episodes the thrombocytopenia is severe (platelets <50 x 10(9)/L). Practical and clinically relevant classifications of neonatal thrombocytopenia have now been developed which, by highlighting the principal conditions precipitating severe thrombocytopenia (eg, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, perinatal asphyxia, and the immune thrombocytopenias), aid the practicing neonatologist. Recent reviews demonstrate that many neonates with severe thrombocytopenia receive repeated platelet transfusions, although evidence of their clinical benefit is lacking, and there exists a significant variation in platelet transfusion practice between centers. These facts support the need for the development of evidence-based protocols for platelet transfusion in the newborn and stimulate continued interest in the potential of hemopoietic growth factors (, thrombopoietin and interleukin-11) to prevent or treat neonatal thrombocytopenia.

The investigation and management of neonatal haemostasis and thrombosis

These guidelines address developmental aspects of neonatal haemostasis and thrombosis, the laboratory investigation of the neonate, and the diagnosis and clinical management of haemostatic and thrombotic conditions occurring in this period (defined as the first 4 weeks of life following birth). Relevant scientific papers were identified by a systematic literature review from Medline 1975-2000 using index terms which incorporated the various component subjects of these guidelines. Further publications were obtained from the references cited and from reviews known to the members of the working party and to the Haemostasis and Thrombosis Task Force. Evidence and graded recommendations presented in these guidelines are in accordance with the US Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, as described in the Appendix. It will be noted that there is a lack of a strong evidence base for many of the recommendations suggested, as the appropriate clinical and laboratory trials have not been and perhaps never will be undertaken in neonates. Most of the recommendations are therefore of Grade C evidence levels IV: higher levels are mentioned specifically throughout the document when relevant.

Platelet transfusion in the management of severe thrombocytopenia in neonatal intensive care unit patients

Platelet transfusions are frequently given to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients with severe thrombocytopenia (platelets less than 50 x 10(9) L(-1)) but no study has assessed whether this is clinically appropriate. To address this we conducted a retrospective review of platelet transfusion practice in patients developing severe thrombocytopenia over 3 years in a single NICU. Out of 901 admissions, 53 (6%) developed severe thrombocytopenia. Twenty-seven neonates received a total of 63 platelet transfusions, the main triggers being: platelet count less than 30 x 10(9) L(-1) (all patients), or less than 50 x 10(9) L(-1) in those with previous haemorrhage or clinical instability. No major haemorrhage occurred during severe thrombocytopenia either in neonates in whom platelet transfusions were withheld (26/53) or in neonates given platelets who survived to discharge (22/27). Five preterm neonates given platelets died but all had overwhelming sepsis or necrotizing enterocolitis and none died directly as a result of haemorrhage. Although the widely used liberal triggers for neonatal platelet transfusion highlighted in this review reflect available guidelines, and represent cautious ('safe') haemostatic practice, they are likely to result in unnecessary transfusion for a significant number of NICU patients. Improved practice requires definition of a safe lower limit for platelet count in stable neonates; effective platelet transfusion strategies for sick neonates; and improved therapies for conditions precipitating severe thrombocytopenia.

Epidemiologic and outcome studies of patients who received platelet transfusions in the neonatal intensive care unit

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a historic cohort study of neonates who received platelet transfusions at the National Institute of Perinatology, Mexico City, from January 1997 to May 2000. We obtained descriptive and outcome data, and assessed demographic and laboratory means of predicting "good candidates" for a future recombinant thrombopoietin (rTpo) trial.

RESULTS

A minority of the transfused patients (11.4%) received only one transfusion; the majority (88.6%) received multiple transfusions. Neonates who received one or more platelet transfusions were more likely to die (24.5% mortality) than neonates who received no platelet transfusions (3.7% mortality). Regression analyses indicated that the presence of liver disease was the best predictor of a "good candidate" for rTpo administration.

CONCLUSION

The majority of neonates in our institution who receive platelet transfusions receive multiple, not single, transfusions. Receiving any platelet transfusion is a marker for high risk of death. Neonates with liver disease who receive platelet transfusions might be a reasonable group for a phase I rTpo trial.

Association between serum macrophage colony-stimulating factor levels and monocyte and thrombocyte counts in healthy, hypoxic, and septic term neonates

OBJECTIVE

Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) is a hematopoietic growth factor that mainly stimulates the growth, differentiation, and proliferation of cells of the monocyte-macrophage lineage. There are only limited numbers of studies about M-CSF levels in neonates, but high levels of serum M-CSF have been reported in septic and some thrombocytopenic adult patients. In this study, we investigated the serum M-CSF levels in healthy, septic, and hypoxic term neonates on the first day of life and examined the relationship of serum M-CSF levels and circulating monocyte and thrombocyte counts in these newborn infants.

STUDY DESIGN

Three groups were defined in this prospective study: group 1, healthy neonates with no risk factors (n = 40); group 2, neonates who had severe hypoxia (n = 20); and group 3, neonates who fulfilled the criteria for early-onset sepsis (n = 18). Blood samples were collected for complete blood cell count and serum M-CSF levels by peripheral venipuncture from each infant in the first 24 hours after birth before any medical therapy.

RESULTS

The gestational ages and birth weights did not differ significantly between the groups. Serum M-CSF levels of the septic neonates were significantly higher than of both healthy and hypoxic neonates, but did not differ significantly between the healthy and hypoxic neonates. There was no significant correlation between serum M-CSF levels and circulating monocyte counts, but there was a significant inverse correlation between serum M-CSF levels and thrombocyte counts. When this correlation was analyzed according to groups, we determined that this inverse correlation between M-CSF levels and thrombocyte counts was especially significant in the septic neonate group, but not significant in the healthy and hypoxic neonate groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum M-CSF levels are significantly higher in neonates with sepsis. High serum M-CSF levels may have a possible role in the pathogenesis of thrombocytopenia in neonates with sepsis.

High levels of reticulated platelets and thrombopoietin characterize fetal thrombopoiesis

To characterize fetal thrombopoiesis, we determined plasma thrombopoietin (TPO) and glycocalicin levels, platelet counts and reticulated platelets (RP) of fetuses and compared them with the respective values of their mothers. Percutaneous umbilical vein sampling in abnormal pregnancies revealed twofold higher thrombopoietin levels and 20-fold higher reticulated platelet counts, but lower levels of glycocalicin in fetuses compared with their mothers (P < 0.05). Neither the expression of platelet glycoprotein Ib and IIb on platelets nor the platelet counts were different between mothers and their fetuses. These data indicate enhanced thrombopoiesis and/or increased platelet turnover in fetuses.

Neonatal thrombocytopenia: new insights into pathogenesis and implications for clinical management

The healthy fetus has a platelet count of greater than 150 x 10(9)/L by the second trimester of pregnancy and only 2% of term infants are thrombocytopenic at birth. Severe thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50 x 10(9)/L) occurs in fewer than three per 1000 term infants, the most important cause being alloimmune thrombocytopenia. In contrast, in infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units, thrombocytopenia develops in 25% and in up to half of sick preterm infants. Recent evidence shows that these infants mostly have evidence of underlying impaired fetal megakaryocytopoiesis and platelet production following pregnancy complications characterized by placental insufficiency or fetal hypoxia. The mechanism of this is unknown. However, many neonatal complications exacerbate this thrombocytopenic potential and 20% of thrombocytopenias in neonatal intensive care unit patients are severe. Evidence-based guidelines for platelet transfusion therapy in these patients are yet to be defined, but as platelet underproduction underlies most neonatal thrombocytopenias, recombinant hemopoietic growth factors, including thrombopoietin and interkeukin-11, may be useful future therapies.

[Perinatal thrombocytopenia of maternal origin]

Maternal causes of perinatal thrombocytopenia include neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia, autoimmune disorders, intrauterine infections and hypertensive diseases. The diagnosis of these pathologies is difficult because they can occur in sick neonates, but also in healthy babies without a history suggesting illness. The treatment has to be quickly established in order to decrease eventual hemorrhagic complications. These latter can be amplified by several clinical circumstances and especially by the platelet immaturity of this time of life. The risk of recurrence for the next pregnancies has to be determined and can lead to diagnostic or therapeutic measures during the antenatal period.