Teicoplanin-dependent antibodies: detection and characterization

Thrombocytopenia Associated With Teicoplanin Use: A Retrospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Contradictory studies reporting vast heterogeneity in the teicoplanin-induced thrombocytopenia (TIT) incidence exist.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the incidence of TIT associated with teicoplanin dosing range (6-12 mg/kg/dose) and the risk factors of TIT.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included adult patients who received teicoplanin for ≥3 consecutive days over a period of 3.5 years. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a platelet count of <100 × 103/µL coupled with at least a 25% drop from the baseline count. The TIT incidence was assessed using the adverse drug reaction probability scale (Naranjo scale).

RESULTS

Data from 482 patients who received teicoplanin and met the predefined inclusion criteria were included in the analyses. The cohort presented a mean age of 53.5 ± 19 years, where 72.4% were male, and 49.2% exhibited normal baseline renal function. Teicoplanin was most commonly used for bacteremia (n = 134), and the most common isolated pathogen being Staphylococcus aureus (n = 221). The TIT incidence was 4.6% (the possible and probable category using the Naranjo scale; 22/482). The median time to first platelet count dropped to <100 × 103/µL after teicoplanin initiation was 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 3-10) days and 8 (IQR, 5-14) days till the maximum platelet count dropped. None of the tested patient variables were found to be independently associated with an increased risk of thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

The overall TIT incidence was low across our study cohort, including critically ill patients. Our study results may aid in the optimal monitoring of such serious teicoplanin-induced adverse effects.

Detection of Drug-Induced Thrombocytopenia Signals in Children Using Routine Electronic Medical Records

Background: Drug-induced thrombocytopenia (DITP) is a severe adverse reaction and a significantly under-recognized clinical problem in children. However, for post-marketing pharmacovigilance purposes, detection of DITP signals is crucial. This study aimed to develop a signal detection model for DITP using the pediatric electronic medical records (EMR) data.

Methods: This study used the electronic medical records collected at Beijing Children’s Hospital between 2009 and 2020. A two-stage modeling method was developed to detect the signal of DITP. In the first stage, we calculated the crude incidence by mining cases of thrombocytopenia to select the potential suspected drugs. In the second stage, we constructed propensity score–matched retrospective cohorts of specific screened drugs from the first stage and estimated the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using conditional logistic regression models. The novelty of the signal was assessed by current evidence.

Results: In the study, from a total of 839 drugs, 21 drugs were initially screened as potentially inducing thrombocytopenia. In total, we identified 18 positive DITP associations. Of these, potential DITP risk of nystatin (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.37–2.22) and latamoxef sodium (OR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.38–1.88) were two new DITP signals in both children and adults. Six associations between thrombocytopenia and drugs including imipenem (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.16–2.45), teicoplanin (OR: 4.75, 95% CI: 3.33–6.78), fusidic acid (OR: 2.81, 95% CI: 2.06–3.86), ceftizoxime sodium (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.36–2.45), ceftazidime (OR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.58–2.95), and cefepime (OR: 5.06, 95% CI: 3.77–6.78) were considered as new signals in children.

Conclusion: This study developed a two-stage algorithm to detect safety signals of DITP and found eighteen positive signals of DITP, including six new signals in a pediatric population. This method is a promising tool for pharmacovigilance based on EMR data.

Pathophysiology and Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia

Drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia (DITP) is a life-threatening clinical syndrome that is under-recognized and difficult to diagnose. Many drugs can cause immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, but the most commonly implicated are abciximab, carbamazepine, ceftriaxone, eptifibatide, heparin, ibuprofen, mirtazapine, oxaliplatin, penicillin, quinine, quinidine, rifampicin, suramin, tirofiban, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. Several different mechanisms have been identified in typical DITP, which is most commonly characterized by severe thrombocytopenia due to clearance and/or destruction of platelets sensitized by a drug-dependent antibody. Patients with typical DITP usually bleed when symptomatic, and biological confirmation of the diagnosis is often difficult because detection of drug-dependent antibodies (DDabs) in the patient’s serum or plasma is frequently not possible. This is in contrast to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which is a particular DITP caused in most cases by heparin-dependent antibodies specific for platelet factor 4, which can strongly activate platelets in vitro and in vivo, explaining why affected patients usually have thrombotic complications but do not bleed. In addition, laboratory tests are readily available to diagnose HIT, unlike the methods used to detect DDabs associated with other DITP that are mostly reserved for laboratories specialized in platelet immunology.

A Case of Teicoplanin-Induced Pancytopenia Caused by Excessive Dosing

Teicoplanin is reported to be as effective as vancomycin but with minimal side effects. We report a case of teicoplanin-induced pancytopenia, which has not been demonstrated previously. A 44-year-old man with tetraplegia was treated with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection and pneumonia, and a high-dose of teicoplanin (400 mg every 12 hours) was administered for 4 days inadvertently. Although the infection rapidly improved, the patient developed pancytopenia by the fourth day of teicoplanin therapy, which was improved after reducing the dose of teicoplanin (200 mg/d). Our patient represents a probable case of teicoplanin-induced pancytopenia with adverse drug reaction probability score of 6.

Flow cytometry in the diagnosis of drug-induced thrombocytopenia: two illustrative cases

Drug-induced thrombocytopenia is a challenging diagnosis in the clinical practice because of the many drugs or alternative causes that may be implicated. Exact identification of such drug(s) is required to guide future management and avoid re-exposure. We describe two cases of isolated thrombocytopenia in which cytometric analysis, a readily available technique, allowed the identification of the causative drug in the context of complex therapies (rifampicin and abciximab causing late onset thrombocytopenia).

[Cutaneous drug reactions induced by glycopeptides]

Glycopeptides are a class of antibiotics used with a rising frequency because of the increasing number of infections due to Methicillin-resistant staphylococci. The dermatological adverse effect of vancomycin are well-known: "red man syndrome", maculopapular exanthema, etc., with some distinctive features such as Ig A linear dermatosis. Drug eruptions are less common but not insignificant when using teicoplanin, a more recent molecule. A given glycopeptide cannot be considered as an alternative for every patient "allergic" to another, because of cases of cross-reaction and the morbi-mortality of some cutaneous drug reactions. This emphasizes the importance to recognize early clinical signs. In this article, we review the various dermatological adverse drug reactions induced by glycopeptides, and suggest a possible management to clinicians who could be confronted with this problem.

Vancomycin-induced immune thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin has only rarely been implicated as a cause of thrombocytopenia, and there is only limited evidence that this complication is caused by immune mechanisms. We conducted a study to determine whether thrombocytopenia is caused by vancomycin-dependent antibodies in patients being treated with vancomycin.

METHODS

We identified and characterized vancomycin-dependent, platelet-reactive antibodies in patients who had been referred for testing during a 5-year period because of a clinical suspicion of vancomycin-induced thrombocytopenia. We obtained clinical information about the patients from their referring physicians.

RESULTS

Drug-dependent, platelet-reactive antibodies of the IgG class, the IgM class, or both were identified in 34 patients, and clinical follow-up information was obtained from 29 of these patients. The mean nadir platelet count in these patients was 13,600 per cubic millimeter, and severe bleeding occurred in 10 patients (34%). Platelet levels returned to baseline in all 26 surviving patients after vancomycin was stopped. In 15 patients, the drug was continued for 1 to 14 days while other possible causes of thrombocytopenia were investigated. Vancomycin-dependent antibodies were not found in 25 patients who had been given vancomycin and in whom thrombocytopenia did not develop.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe bleeding can occur in patients with vancomycin-induced immune thrombocytopenia. The detection of vancomycin-dependent antiplatelet antibodies in patients receiving the antibiotic in whom thrombocytopenia develops, and the absence of antibodies in patients given the drug in whom platelet counts remain stable, indicate that these antibodies are the cause of the thrombocytopenia.