The performance of STA-Liatest D-dimer assay in out-patients with suspected pulmonary embolism

Can Rosuvastatin Reduce the Risk of Thrombosis in Patients with Hypercholesterolemia with its Effect on Coagulation Factors and Homocysteine Levels?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hypercholesterolemia is one of the main risk factors for vascular thrombosis in individuals. Therefore, the use of statins is very effective in reducing cholesterol and can reduce the risk of thrombosis in these patients. Rosuvastatin, a member of the statin family which, inhibits cholesterol synthesis. Very few studies have been done in relation to how rosuvastatin can affect thrombosis. So, this research has been tried whether rosuvastatin can have an effect on coagulation factors and homocysteine as risk factors for thrombosis in hypercholesterolemia?

METHODS

In this experimental study, 60 patients (30 men and 30 women with a mean age of 40- 70 years) diagnosed with hypercholesterolemia (cholesterol > 250 mg/dl) participated in this research. 30 patients were prescribed rosuvastatin (20 mg/day), and 30 patients were simultaneously taken placebo for three months. All parameters, including FVIII, FV, Fibrinogen, DDimer, plasma homocysteine level and lipid profile, were measured before and after treatment. All the results were statistically compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In patients who took rosuvastatin, the drug was able to significantly reduce the concentrations of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (P < 0.001). Also, rosuvastatin was able to reduce the concentrations of homocysteine significantly, D-Dimer (P < 0.001), coagulation factor VIII and factor V (P < 0.05). In patients with hypercholesterolemia who took the placebo, did not affect the mentioned variables (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

According to the results, it seems that rosuvastatin may be able to reduce the risk of thrombosis in patients by affecting coagulation factors and homocysteine levels.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism

Prompt evaluation and therapeutic intervention of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) are of paramount importance for improvement in outcomes. We systematically reviewed outcomes in patients with suspected PE, including mortality, incidence of recurrent PE, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and postthrombotic sequelae. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase for eligible studies, reference lists of relevant reviews, registered trials, and relevant conference proceedings. We included 22 studies with 15 865 patients. Among patients who were diagnosed with PE and discharged with anticoagulation, 3-month follow-up revealed that all-cause mortality was 5.69% (91/1599; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.56-6.83), mortality from PE was 1.19% (19/1597; 95% CI, 0.66-1.72), recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurred in 1.38% (22/1597; 95% CI: 0.81-1.95), and major bleeding occurred in 0.90% (2/221%; 95% CI, 0-2.15). In patients with a low pretest probability (PTP) and negative D-dimer, 3-month follow-up revealed mortality from PE was 0% (0/808) and incidence of VTE was 0.37% (4/1094; 95% CI: 0.007-0.72). In patients with intermediate PTP and negative D-dimer, 3-month follow-up revealed that mortality from PE was 0% (0/2747) and incidence of VTE was 0.46% (14/3015; 95% CI: 0.22-0.71). In patients with high PTP and negative computed tomography (CT) scan, 3-month follow-up revealed mortality from PE was 0% (0/651) and incidence of VTE was 0.84% (11/1302; 95% CI: 0.35-1.34). We further summarize outcomes evaluated by various diagnostic tests and diagnostic pathways (ie, D-dimer followed by CT scan).

The Usefulness of the Combination of D-Dimer and Soluble Fibrin Monomer Complex for Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism in Psychiatric Practice: A Prospective Study

Purpose

D-dimer has the advantage of excluding venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to its high sensitivity but is disadvantageous for diagnosing VTE due to its low specificity. A method to increase the usefulness of D-dimer in the diagnosis of VTE is warranted. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the combination of D-dimer and soluble fibrin monomer complex (SFMC), which has been suggested as a new candidate marker for VTE, in VTE diagnosis.

Patients and Methods

This prospective study in 109 subjects was performed at a psychiatric department between August 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019. Subjects’ levels of D-dimer and SFMC were measured simultaneously. Plasma levels of D-dimer and SFMC were measured using NANOPIA^® D-dimer and NANOPIA^® SF. Subjects with positive D-dimer (≥1.0 µg/mL) results underwent contrast computed tomography for confirmation of VTE within 12 hours of D-dimer measurement. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to examine the usefulness of SFMC for the diagnosis of VTE.

Results

Only 109 of the 783 subjects without symptoms suggestive of VTE participated in the study. Out of 41 subjects with positive D-dimer results, 17 subjects were diagnosed with VTE. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine cutoff values. The area under the curves was 0.848 for SFMC (p<0.001, 95% CI 0.722 to 0.974), and the optimal cutoff value was 10.0 µg/mL (sensitivity 58.8%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 77.4%).

Conclusion

SFMC was useful for diagnosing VTE in the psychiatric patients with positive D-dimer results.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common, potentially life-threatening yet treatable condition. Prompt diagnosis and expeditious therapeutic intervention is of paramount importance for optimal patient management. Our objective was to systematically review the accuracy of D-dimer assay, compression ultrasonography (CUS), computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), and ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scanning for the diagnosis of suspected first and recurrent PE. We searched Cochrane Central, MEDLINE, and EMBASE for eligible studies, reference lists of relevant reviews, registered trials, and relevant conference proceedings. 2 investigators screened and abstracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. We pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity. The review included 61 studies. The pooled estimates for D-dimer sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-0.98) and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.36-0.46) respectively, whereas CTPA sensitivity and specificity were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.97) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99), respectively, and CUS sensitivity and specificity were 0.49 (95% CI, 0.31-0.66) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98), respectively. Three variations of pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity of V/Q scan were carried out, based on interpretation of test results. D-dimer had the highest sensitivity when compared with imaging. CTPA and V/Q scans (high probability scan as a positive and low/non-diagnostic/normal scan as negative) both had the highest specificity. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO as CRD42018084669.

American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: diagnosis of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Modern diagnostic strategies for venous thromboembolism (VTE) incorporate pretest probability (PTP; prevalence) assessment. The ability of diagnostic tests to correctly identify or exclude VTE is influenced by VTE prevalence and test accuracy characteristics.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines are intended to support patients, clinicians, and health care professionals in VTE diagnosis. Diagnostic strategies were evaluated for pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower and upper extremity, and recurrent VTE.

METHODS

The American Society of Hematology (ASH) formed a multidisciplinary panel including patient representatives. The McMaster University GRADE Centre completed systematic reviews up to 1 October 2017. The panel prioritized questions and outcomes and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess evidence and make recommendations. Test accuracy estimates and VTE population prevalence were used to model expected outcomes in diagnostic pathways. Where modeling was not feasible, management and accuracy studies were used to formulate recommendations.

RESULTS

Ten recommendations are presented, by PTP for patients with suspected PE and lower extremity DVT, and for recurrent VTE and upper extremity DVT.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients at low (unlikely) VTE risk, using D-dimer as the initial test reduces the need for diagnostic imaging. For patients at high (likely) VTE risk, imaging is warranted. For PE diagnosis, ventilation-perfusion scanning and computed tomography pulmonary angiography are the most validated tests, whereas lower or upper extremity DVT diagnosis uses ultrasonography. Research is needed on new diagnostic modalities and to validate clinical decision rules for patients with suspected recurrent VTE.

D-Dimer Measured at Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism is Associated with Risk of Major Bleeding

Identification of patients at risk of major bleeding is pivotal for optimal management of anticoagulant therapy in venous thromboembolism (VTE). Studies have suggested that D-dimer may predict major bleeding during anticoagulation; however, this is scarcely investigated in VTE patients. We aimed to investigate the role of D-dimer, measured at VTE diagnosis, as a predictive biomarker of major bleeding. The study population comprised 555 patients with a first community-acquired VTE (1994-2016), who were identified among participants from the Tromsø study. Major bleeding events were recorded during the first year after VTE and defined according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Cox-regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for age, sex, and duration of anticoagulant therapy. In total, 29 patients experienced major bleeding (incidence rate: 5.7/100 person-years, 95% CI: 4.0-8.2). The major bleeding risk was highest during the first 3 months, especially in patients with D-dimer ≥8.3 µg/mL (upper 20th percentile), with 28.8 major bleedings/100 person-years (95% CI: 13.7-60.4). Patients with D-dimer ≥8.3 µg/mL had a 2.6-fold (95% CI: 1.1-6.6) higher risk of major bleeding than patients with D-dimer ≤2.3 µg/mL (lower 40th percentile). Major bleeding risk according to D-dimer ≥8.3 versus ≤2.3 µg/mL was particularly pronounced among those with deep vein thrombosis (HR: 4.6, 95% CI: 1.3-16.2) and provoked events (HR: 4.2, 95% CI: 1.0-16.8). In conclusion, our results suggest that D-dimer measured at diagnosis may serve as a predictive biomarker of major bleeding after VTE, especially within the initial 3 months.

Safety of D-dimer testing as a stand-alone test for the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis as compared with other strategies

Essentials The aim of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) diagnostic work-up is to maximize both safety and efficiency. We explored whether D-dimer is safe and efficient as a stand-alone test to exclude DVT. Our findings suggest it is a safe, efficient and simplified diagnostic strategy. The safety of age-adjusted D-dimer as a stand-alone test requires further investigation. SUMMARY: Background Several strategies for safely excluding deep vein thrombosis (DVT) while limiting the number of imaging tests have been explored. Objectives To determine whether D-dimer testing could safely and efficiently exclude DVT as a stand-alone test, and evaluate its performance as compared with strategies that incorporate the Wells score and age-adjusted D-dimer. Patients/Methods We included consecutive outpatients referred with suspected DVT to the Emergency Department at Østfold Hospital, Norway. STA-Liatest D-Di PLUS D-dimer was analyzed for all patients. Patients with a D-dimer level of ≥ 0.5 μg mL-1 were referred for compression ultrasonography (CUS). In patients with a D-dimer level of < 0.5 μg mL-1 , no further testing was performed and anticoagulation was withheld. Patients were followed for 3 months for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Results Of the 913 included patients, 298 (33%) had a negative D-dimer result. One hundred and seventy-three patients (18.9%) were diagnosed with DVT at baseline. One of 298 patients had DVT despite having a negative D-dimer result, resulting in a failure rate of 0.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-1.9%). Adding the modified Wells score would have yielded a failure rate of 0.0% (95% CI 0.0-1.8%) while necessitating 87 more CUS examinations. Age-adjusted D-dimer as a stand-alone test would have necessitated 80 fewer CUS examinations than fixed D-dimer as a stand-alone test, at the cost of a failure rate of 1.6% (95% CI 0.7-3.4%). Conclusions This outcome study shows that a negative high-sensitivity D-dimer result safely excludes DVT in an outpatient population, and necessitates fewer CUS than if used in combination with Wells score. The safety of stand-alone age-adjusted D-dimer needs further assessment in prospective outcome studies.

D-dimer at venous thrombosis diagnosis is associated with risk of recurrence

Essentials Whether D-dimer at incident venous thromboembolism (VTE) can predict recurrence-risk is unknown. We explored this association in 454 cancer-free patients with a first lifetime VTE. A low D-dimer at first VTE diagnosis was associated with a low recurrence risk. The association was predominant in patients with deep vein thrombosis and unprovoked VTE. Click to hear Dr Cannegieter's presentation on venous thrombosis: prediction of recurrence SUMMARY: Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common disease with a high recurrence rate. D-dimer measured after cessation of anticoagulant therapy predicts recurrence, and is used to decide on treatment prolongation. However, whether D-dimer measured at first VTE diagnosis can be used to assess recurrence-risk is unknown. Aims To investigate the association between D-dimer, measured at first VTE diagnosis and risk of recurrent VTE. Methods Information on clinical risk factors and laboratory markers were collected in 454 cancer-free patients with a first VTE. Recurrent VTEs and deaths during follow-up (1994-2012) were recorded. Results During a median follow-up of 3.9 years, 84 patients experienced a recurrent VTE. The crude recurrence rate was 1.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-2.9) per 100 person-years in the lower quartile of D-dimer (≤ 1500 ng mL-1 ), and 4.9 (95% CI, 3.9-6.1) per 100 person-years in the upper three quartiles combined, yielding an absolute risk difference of 3.2 per 100 person-years. Patients with D-dimer ≤ 1500 ng mL-1 had 54% lower recurrence-risk than patients with D-dimer > 1500 ng mL-1 (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25-0.82). The association was particularly pronounced among patients with unprovoked events and deep vein thrombosis, showing a 66% (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.74) and 68% (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.14-0.71) lower recurrence risk among patients with D-dimer ≤ 1500 ng mL-1 , respectively. Conclusions A low D-dimer (≤ 1500 ng mL-1 ) measured at first VTE diagnosis was associated with a low recurrence risk, particularly among patients with DVT and unprovoked events. Our findings suggest that a clinical decision to avoid prolonged anticoagulant treatment could be considered based on low D-dimer at the time of VTE diagnosis.

D-dimer test for excluding the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary embolism (PE) can occur when a thrombus (blood clot) travels through the veins and lodges in the arteries of the lungs, producing an obstruction. People who are thought to be at risk include those with cancer, people who have had a recent surgical procedure or have experienced long periods of immobilisation and women who are pregnant. The clinical presentation can vary, but unexplained respiratory symptoms such as difficulty breathing, chest pain and an increased respiratory rate are common.D-dimers are fragments of protein released into the circulation when a blood clot breaks down as a result of normal body processes or with use of prescribed fibrinolytic medication. The D-dimer test is a laboratory assay currently used to rule out the presence of high D-dimer plasma levels and, by association, venous thromboembolism (VTE). D-dimer tests are rapid, simple and inexpensive and can prevent the high costs associated with expensive diagnostic tests.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the ability of the D-dimer test to rule out a diagnosis of acute PE in patients treated in hospital outpatient and accident and emergency (A&E) settings who have had a pre-test probability (PTP) of PE determined according to a clinical prediction rule (CPR), by estimating the accuracy of the test according to estimates of sensitivity and specificity. The review focuses on those patients who are not already established on anticoagulation at the time of study recruitment.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched 13 databases from conception until December 2013. We cross-checked the reference lists of relevant studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two review authors independently applied exclusion criteria to full papers and resolved disagreements by discussion.We included cross-sectional studies of D-dimer in which ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy, computerised tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), selective pulmonary angiography and magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography (MRPA) were used as the reference standard.•

PARTICIPANTS

Adults who were managed in hospital outpatient and A&E settings and were suspected of acute PE were eligible for inclusion in the review if they had received a pre-test probability score based on a CPR.•

INDEX TESTS

quantitative, semi quantitative and qualitative D-dimer tests.• Target condition: acute symptomatic PE.• Reference standards: We included studies that used pulmonary angiography, V/Q scintigraphy, CTPA and MRPA as reference standard tests.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed quality using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). We resolved disagreements by discussion. Review authors extracted patient-level data when available to populate 2 × 2 contingency tables (true-positives (TPs), true-negatives (TNs), false-positives (FPs) and false-negatives (FNs)).

MAIN RESULTS

We included four studies in the review (n = 1585 patients). None of the studies were at high risk of bias in any of the QUADAS-2 domains, but some uncertainty surrounded the validity of studies in some domains for which the risk of bias was uncertain. D-dimer assays demonstrated high sensitivity in all four studies, but with high levels of false-positive results, especially among those over the age of 65 years. Estimates of sensitivity ranged from 80% to 100%, and estimates of specificity from 23% to 63%.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

A negative D-dimer test is valuable in ruling out PE in patients who present to the A&E setting with a low PTP. Evidence from one study suggests that this test may have less utility in older populations, but no empirical evidence was available to support an increase in the diagnostic threshold of interpretation of D-dimer results for those over the age of 65 years.

Assessing 2 D-dimer age-adjustment strategies to optimize computed tomographic use in ED evaluation of pulmonary embolism

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Validate the sensitivity and specificity of 2 age adjustment strategies for d-dimer values in identifying patients at risk for pulmonary embolism (PE) compared with traditional D-dimer cutoff value (500 ng/mL) to decrease inappropriate computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) use.

METHODS

This institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective study included all adult emergency department patients evaluated for PE over a 32-month period (1/1/11-8/30/13). Only patients undergoing CTPA and D-dimer testing were included. We used a validated natural language processing algorithm to parse CTPA radiology reports and determine the presence of acute PE. Outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity of 2 age-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs compared with the traditional cutoff. We used χ2 tests with proportional analyses to assess differences in traditional and age-adjusted (age×10 ng/mL) D-dimer cutoffs, adjusting both by decade and by year.

RESULTS

A total 3063 patients with suspected PE were evaluated by CTPA during the study period, and 1055 (34%) also received d-dimer testing. The specificity of age-adjusted D-dimer values was similar or higher for each age group studied compared with traditional cutoff, without significantly compromising sensitivity. Overall, had decade age-adjusted cutoffs been used, 37 CTPAs could have been avoided (19.6% of 189 patients aged >60 years with Wells score≤4); had yearly age-adjusted cutoffs been used, 52 CTPAs (18.2% of 286 patients aged >50 years with Wells score≤4) could have been avoided.

CONCLUSION

Each age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff strategy for the evaluation of PE was associated with increased specificity and statistically insignificant decreased sensitivity when compared with the traditional D-dimer cutoff value.

Misinterpreting risk and test results delays diagnosis in a patient with pulmonary embolism

We report the case of a middle-aged man where a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) was delayed due to initial underestimation of risk and over-reliance on D-dimer testing. The patient presented with pleuritic chest pain after a 5 h domestic flight. The treating clinicians presumed that this duration of immobilisation was insufficient to cause a PE, D-dimer was not measured and the patient was discharged home. One week later, the patient re-presented due to persistence of chest pain. On this occasion, D-dimer was measured and it was normal, which was interpreted as excluding a PE. Subsequently, a CT pulmonary angiogram was performed, which demonstrated a subsegmental PE. This case highlights the importance of accurate assessment of PE-risk factors and following clinical guidelines, since a delayed diagnosis of PE is associated with increased mortality.

D-dimer as a predictor of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill, hospitalized patients: a subanalysis of the randomized controlled MAGELLAN trial

BACKGROUND

D-dimer concentrations have not been evaluated extensively as a predictor of increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in acutely ill, hospitalized medical patients.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the relationships between D-dimer concentration, VTE and bleeding in the MAGELLAN trial (NCT00571649).

PATIENTS/METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Patients aged ≥ 40 years, hospitalized for acute medical illnesses with risk factors for VTE received subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once daily for 10 ± 4 days then placebo up to day 35, or oral rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily for 35 ± 4 days. Patients (n = 7581) were grouped by baseline D-dimer ≤ 2 × or > 2 × the upper limit of normal. VTE and major plus non-major clinically relevant bleeding were recorded at day 10, day 35, and between days 11 and 35.

RESULTS

The frequency of VTE was 3.5-fold greater in patients with high D-dimer concentrations. Multivariate analysis showed that D-dimer was an independent predictor of the risk of VTE (odds ratio 2.29 [95% confidence interval 1.75-2.98]), and had a similar association to established risk factors for VTE, for example cancer and advanced age. In the high D-dimer group, rivaroxaban was non-inferior to enoxaparin at day 10 and, unlike the low D-dimer group, superior to placebo at day 35 (P < 0.001) and days 11-35 (P < 0.001). In both groups, bleeding outcomes favored enoxaparin/placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated baseline D-dimer concentrations may identify acutely ill, hospitalized medical patients at high risk of VTE for whom extended anticoagulant prophylaxis may provide greater benefit than for those with low D-dimer concentrations.

Fluorescence immunoassay of human D-dimer in whole blood

BACKGROUND

D-dimer is a widely used biomarker for the initial clinical assessment of suspected deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Here, we presented a new fluorescence (FL) D-dimer assay system, which was developed with a platform of point-of-care test (POCT) for clinical applications.

METHODS

Whole blood was mixed with FL-labeled anti-D-dimer detector antibody, and then loaded onto a disposable cartridge. After 12 min of incubation, the FL intensity was acquired by scanning of test cartridge and converted as level of D-dimer in a laser FL scanner. The analytical performance of FL immunoassay was evaluated by linearity, recovery, and precision tests. The comparability of the developed assay was examined with automated reference methods.

RESULTS

The FL assay system showed a good linearity, and the analytical mean recovery of control was 103% in a dynamic working range. The imprecision of intra- and inter-as-say of coefficient of variations from assay system was less than 8%. The developed FL assay system showed strong correlation with two automated reference assays, Vidas D-dimer (r = 0.973) and Stalia D-dimer (r = 0.971).

CONCLUSION

The new FL immunoassay for D-dimer is a user-friendly, precise, and reproducible platform of POCT in whole blood.

Prospective diagnostic accuracy assessment of the HemosIL HS D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism in emergency department patients

INTRODUCTION

Chest pain and shortness of breath are among the most common symptoms requiring immediate evaluation. Testing for pulmonary embolism (PE) has become easier and widespread due to D-dimer blood tests. Safe use of these tests is only possible if sensitivity is high and they are used in non-high probability patients. We evaluated diagnostic performance of the HemosIL HS D-dimer, which despite FDA approval in 2005, has been minimally reported in prospective standard clinical care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used a prospective observational study design to follow patients in a single center with the HemosIL HS ordered for symptoms of possible PE with positive test result if >243 ng/ml. The outcome was PE or deep venous thrombosis (DVT) at the time of presentation or subsequent 45 days determined by structured evaluation of imaging tests, phone, or medical record follow-up in all patients.

RESULTS

529 patients received a D-dimer and 4.7% were ultimately diagnosed with PE or DVT. The sensitivity of the HemosIL HS was 96.0% (95% CI; 79.6 to 99.9%) specificity was 65.7% (95% CI; 61.4 to 69.8%) and likelihood ratio negative was 0.06 (95% CI; 0.01 to 0.42). The probability of PE in patients with a negative D-dimer was 1/332 or 0.3% (95% CI; 0.01% to 1.67%). The receiver operator curve had an area under the curve of 0.87 and supported the current cut-point as optimal.

CONCLUSIONS

The HemosIL HS D-dimer had high sensitivity, very low negative post-test probability and is useful in excluding PE in the acute care setting.

Assessment of pretest probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department by physicians in training using the Wells model

INTRODUCTION

Assessment of pretest probability should be the initial step in investigation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). In teaching hospitals physicians in training are often the first physicians to evaluate patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of pretest probability assessment of PE by physicians in training using the Wells clinical model and to assess the safety of a diagnostic strategy including pretest probability assessment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

291 consecutive outpatients with clinical suspicion of PE were categorized as having a low, moderate or high pretest probability of PE by physicians in training who could take supervising physicians' advice when they deemed necessary. Then, patients were managed according to a sequential diagnostic algorithm including D-dimer testing, lung scan, leg compression ultrasonography and helical computed tomography. Patients in whom PE was deemed absent were followed up for 3 months.

RESULTS

34 patients (18%) had PE. Prevalence of PE in the low, moderate and high pretest probability groups categorized by physicians in training alone was 3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1% to 9%), 31% (95% CI: 22% to 42%) and 100% (95% CI: 61% to 100%) respectively. One of the 152 untreated patients (0.7%, 95% CI: 0.1% to 3.6%) developed a thromboembolic event during the 3-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Physicians in training can use the Wells clinical model to determine pretest probability of PE. A diagnostic strategy including the use of this model by physicians in training with access to supervising physicians' advice appears to be safe.

D-dimer level is associated with the extent of pulmonary embolism

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to study the association between the level of D-dimer and the severity of pulmonary embolism (PE) as determined by various biochemical and radiological prognostic markers in order to investigate the potential value of D-dimer as a prognostic marker for the severity of PE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PE was diagnosed in 100 consecutive out-patients by multi-detector computerized tomography. One patient was excluded and the final cohort consisted of 99 patients. Pulmonary Artery Obstruction Index (PAOI) and Right Ventricular/Left Ventricular (RV/LV) ratio were assessed.

RESULTS

The median value for D-dimer was 5.0 mg/L (inter-quartile range: 1.8, 12.2). There was a significant association between log D-dimer, and between log RV/LV (r=0.45), log PAOI (r=0.5), and PaO(2) (r=0.40). The multivariate analysis showed an increased association between log D-dimer and between log RV/LV ratio (r=0.54) and log PAOI (r=0.52) after adjusting for age, gender and for the duration of symptoms. Significant association was found between the level of D-dimer and the most proximal level of PE (p<0.0005). There was a significant dose-response relationship between the level D-dimer and between Troponin-T and the frequency of thrombolysis (p<0.0005). In the subgroup of patients with D-Dimer over the upper quartile (>12.2), 12 (67%) patients had elevated Troponin-T and 8 (32%) patients received thrombolysis, compared to 1 (5%) patient with elevated Troponin-T and none treated with thrombolysis in the subgroup of patients with D-dimer<lower quartile.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that the level of D-dimer is related to the severity of PE assessed by various radiological, biochemical and clinical markers and might have a potential value as prognostic marker for the severity of PE.

Validation of a new D-dimer microparticle enzyme immunoassay (AxSYM D-Dimer) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE)

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate a new automated assay for D-dimer testing (AxSYM D-Dimer) based on microparticle enzyme-immunoassay technology by comparing it with three well established D-dimer assays.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The performance of the new assay was evaluated in 280 plasma samples that were collected prospectively from out-patients included in a management study evaluating a decision based algorithm.

RESULTS

58/280 patients (21%) had PE diagnosed by CT. Median values of AxSYM D-dimer in patients with PE were 3689 ng/mL (range 775-9000). Comparison analysis displayed excellent agreement with VIDAS (kappa=0.84) and Asserachrom (kappa=0.81) D-dimer assays. A strong correlation was found between AxSYM and the VIDAS (r=0.96) and Asserachrom (r=0.89) D-dimer assays. The highest cut-off value for AxSYM that yielded a sensitivity of 100% was 765 ng/mL with a specificity of 50%. At the cut-off level <500 ng/mL, the sensitivity and specificity of AxSYM D-dimer were 100% and 34%; VIDAS 100% and 42%; Asserachrom 100% and 40%; and STALiatest 100% and 37%, respectively. AxSYM D-dimer was negative in 75 patients (33.8%). None of these had PE at the initial work-up or VTE during the 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

AxSYM D-dimer seems to be safe and effective in ruling out PE in out-patients. The cut-off level can be set at 500 to 750 ng/mL, at which the assay displays a performance that is comparable to that of the ELISA based assays. However, further studies are needed to confirm the safety of the assay and to determine the most optimal cut-off level in patients with venous thromboembolism.

Diagnostic value of D-dimer in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: results from a multicentre outcome study

BACKGROUND

D-dimer tests are used in various diagnostic strategies to exclude pulmonary embolism (PE). However, their role as an exclusionary first-line test is still uncertain, mainly because accuracy of the test varies according to the assay and the studied population.

METHODS

The aim of this multicentre study was to evaluate the accuracy of D-dimer testing in patients with suspected PE. Diagnosis of PE was based on pre-test clinical probability (PCP) evaluation and both single-detector spiral CT (CT) and lower limbs compression ultrasonography (CUS). Lung scanning and/or pulmonary angiography was mandatory when CT or CUS was inconclusive and when both CT and CUS were normal in a patient with a high PCP. All patients were followed-up for 3 months, looking for VTE recurrence. D-dimers were collected within 24 h of inclusion and stored in each local hematology unit, to be analyzed at the end of all inclusions; physicians in charge of the patient were blinded to D-dimer results.

RESULTS

Three hundred and fifty two patients were included in 4 centres. Prevalence of PE was 38.6%. PCP was low in 82 (23.3%), intermediate in 176 (50%) and high in 94 (26.7%) patients. Sensitivity of D-dimer was 96.3% (95% CI: 93-99) and negative predictive value reached 94.4% (95% CI: 90-99). Five patients with a confirmed PE had a D-dimer level below 500 ng/ml (two patients with a high PCP). Among 258 patients with low or intermediate PCP, 80 (31%) had a negative D-dimer test result; three of them had a false negative result and the number needed to test was 3.3. Among 94 patients with a high PCP, 9 had a negative D-dimer test result; two of them had a false negative result and the number needed to test was 13.5.

CONCLUSION

These results confirm that rapid assays used in this study can safely exclude PE in first-line testing only in non-high CP patients.