1
|
Jarade EF, El Rami H, Abdelmassih Y, Amro M. Chronic ocular GVHD: limbal and conjunctival stem cell allografts from the same hematopoietic stem cell donor. Int J Ophthalmol 2018; 11:1569-1572. [PMID: 30225237 DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2018.09.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Elias F Jarade
- Beirut Eye and ENT Specialist Hospital, Beirut 116-5311, Lebanon
| | - Hala El Rami
- Beirut Eye and ENT Specialist Hospital, Beirut 116-5311, Lebanon
| | | | - Mazen Amro
- Beirut Eye and ENT Specialist Hospital, Beirut 116-5311, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Replication of associations between genetic polymorphisms and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood 2016; 128:2450-2456. [PMID: 27758874 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-07-728063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2016] [Accepted: 09/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous studies have identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with the risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The current study determined whether these associations could be replicated in large cohorts of donors and recipients. Each SNP was tested with cohorts of patients having the same donor type (HLA-matched related, unrelated, or both) reported in the original publication, and testing was limited to the same genome (recipient or donor) and genetic model (dominant, recessive, or allelic) reported in the original study. The 21 SNPs reported in this study represent 19 genes, and the analysis encompassed 22 SNP association tests. The hazard ratio (HR) point estimates and risk ratio point estimates corresponding to odds ratios in previous studies consistently fall outside the 95% confidence intervals of HR estimates in the current study. Despite the large size of the cohorts available for the current study, the 95% confidence intervals for most HRs did not exclude 1.0. Three SNPs representing CTLA4, HPSE, and IL1R1 showed evidence of association with the risk of chronic GVHD in unrelated donor-recipient pairs from 1 cohort, but none of these associations was replicated when tested in unrelated donor-recipient pairs from an independent cohort. Two SNPs representing CCR6 and FGFR1OP showed possible associations with the risk of chronic GVHD in related donor-recipient pairs but not in unrelated donor-recipient pairs. These results remain to be tested for replication in other cohorts of related donor-recipient pairs.
Collapse
|
3
|
Paczesny S, Hakim FT, Pidala J, Cooke KR, Lathrop J, Griffith LM, Hansen J, Jagasia M, Miklos D, Pavletic S, Parkman R, Russek-Cohen E, Flowers MED, Lee S, Martin P, Vogelsang G, Walton M, Schultz KR. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: III. The 2014 Biomarker Working Group Report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2015; 21:780-92. [PMID: 25644957 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2015] [Accepted: 01/07/2015] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Biology-based markers to confirm or aid in the diagnosis or prognosis of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation or monitor its progression are critically needed to facilitate evaluation of new therapies. Biomarkers have been defined as any characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of a normal biological or pathogenic process, or of a pharmacologic response to a therapeutic intervention. Applications of biomarkers in chronic GVHD clinical trials or patient management include the following: (1) diagnosis and assessment of chronic GVHD disease activity, including distinguishing irreversible damage from continued disease activity; (2) prognostic risk to develop chronic GVHD; and (3) prediction of response to therapy. Sample collection for chronic GVHD biomarkers studies should be well documented following established quality control guidelines for sample acquisition, processing, preservation, and testing, at intervals that are both calendar and event driven. The consistent therapeutic treatment of subjects and standardized documentation needed to support biomarker studies are most likely to be provided in prospective clinical trials. To date, no chronic GVHD biomarkers have been qualified for use in clinical applications. Since our previous chronic GVHD Biomarkers Working Group report in 2005, an increasing number of chronic GVHD candidate biomarkers are available for further investigation. This paper provides a 4-part framework for biomarker investigations: identification, verification, qualification, and application with terminology based on Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Paczesny
- Department of Pediatrics and Immunology, Indiana University of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
| | - Frances T Hakim
- Experimental Transplantation and Immunology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Joseph Pidala
- Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Kenneth R Cooke
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Julia Lathrop
- Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Linda M Griffith
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - John Hansen
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Madan Jagasia
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - David Miklos
- Stanford Bone Marrow Transplant-Cellular Therapy Facility, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Steven Pavletic
- Experimental Transplantation and Immunology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Robertson Parkman
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Estelle Russek-Cohen
- Division of Biostatistics, Center for Biologics, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Mary E D Flowers
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Stephanie Lee
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Paul Martin
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Georgia Vogelsang
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Marc Walton
- Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Kirk R Schultz
- Michael Cuccione Childhood Cancer Research Program, BC Children's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hart JW, Shiue LH, Shpall EJ, Alousi AM. Extracorporeal photopheresis in the treatment of graft-versus-host disease: evidence and opinion. Ther Adv Hematol 2013; 4:320-34. [PMID: 24082993 DOI: 10.1177/2040620713490316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite significant advances in prevention and treatment strategies, graft-versus-host disease remains the most significant cause of morbidity and nonrelapse mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cellular transplantation. Corticosteroids remain the standard frontline therapy for graft-versus-host disease; however, a considerable number of patients will not respond adequately and others will be significantly affected by adverse effects. Extracorporeal photopheresis is one of several secondary therapies which have shown promise in the clinical setting. While the procedure itself has been around for over 20 years, our understanding of the mechanisms from which therapeutic benefits are seen, and the population they are seen in, remains limited. In this article, we review the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of graft-versus-host disease including details covering the procedure's mechanism of action, safety profile and clinical efficacy data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W Hart
- Department of Pharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Role of non-HLA gene polymorphisms in graft-versus-host disease. Int J Hematol 2013; 98:309-18. [PMID: 23949916 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-013-1416-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2013] [Revised: 08/05/2013] [Accepted: 08/06/2013] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
A large number of reports have associated various non-HLA gene polymorphisms with the risk and severity of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). To date, candidate gene studies and genome-wide association studies have been performed to investigate such non-HLA gene polymorphisms in relation to GVHD. Candidate gene studies are hypothesis-driven and cost-effective, whereas genome-wide association studies have the potential to discover new gene polymorphisms, including possible biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Some gene polymorphisms have the potential to affect protein function or gene expression, or to encode minor histocompatibility antigens. Non-HLA genotyping for genes influencing GVHD prior to transplantation should provide useful information that will facilitate choosing the donor, type of graft, conditioning treatment, and GVHD prophylaxis. However, attention should be paid to the need for validation studies and ethical issues.
Collapse
|
6
|
Biologic markers of chronic GVHD. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 49:324-31. [PMID: 23872737 DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2013.97] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2013] [Revised: 05/30/2013] [Accepted: 06/11/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Biologic markers of chronic GVHD may provide insight into the pathogenesis of the syndrome, identify molecular targets for novel interventions, and facilitate advances in clinical management. Despite extensive work performed to date largely focused on prediction and diagnosis of the syndrome, little synthesis of findings and validation of promising candidate markers in independent populations has been performed. Studies suggest that risk for subsequent chronic GVHD development may be associated with donor-recipient genetic polymorphism, deficiency in regulatory immune cell populations (NK, Treg, DC2), and variation in inflammatory and immunoregulatory mediators post-HCT (increased TNFα, IL-10 and BAFF, and decreased TGFβ and IL-15). Established chronic GVHD is associated with alteration in immune cell populations (increased CD3(+) T cells, Th17, CD4(+) and CD8(+) effector memory cells, monocytes, CD86 expression, BAFF/B cell ratio, and deficiency of Treg, NK cells, and naïve CD8(+) T cells). Inflammatory and immunomodulatory factors (TNFα, IL-6, IL-1β, IL-8, sIL-2R, and IL-1Ra, BAFF, anti-dsDNA, sIL-2Rα, and sCD13) are also perturbed. Little is known about biologic markers of chronic GVHD phenotype and severity, response to therapy, and prognosis.
Collapse
|
7
|
Hymes SR, Alousi AM, Cowen EW. Graft-versus-host disease: part I. Pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 66:515.e1-18; quiz 533-4. [PMID: 22421123 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.11.960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2011] [Revised: 11/09/2011] [Accepted: 11/12/2011] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 25,000 allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants are performed worldwide each year for a variety of malignant and non-malignant conditions. Graft-versus-host disease represents one of the most frequent complications and is a major source of long-term morbidity and mortality. Whereas acute graft-versus-host disease is induced by recognition of host tissues as foreign by immunocompetent donor cells, the pathogenesis of chronic graft-versus-host disease is not as well understood, and continues to be a major treatment challenge. Part I of this two-part series reviews the epidemiologic factors, classification, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Part II discusses the topical, physical, and systemic treatment options available to patients with graft-versus-host disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon R Hymes
- Department of Dermatology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030-4009, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Espinoza JL, Takami A, Onizuka M, Sao H, Akiyama H, Miyamura K, Okamoto S, Inoue M, Kanda Y, Ohtake S, Fukuda T, Morishima Y, Kodera Y, Nakao S. NKG2D gene polymorphism has a significant impact on transplant outcomes after HLA-fully-matched unrelated bone marrow transplantation for standard risk hematologic malignancies. Haematologica 2011; 94:1427-34. [PMID: 19794085 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2009.008318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND NKG2D, an activating and co-stimulatory receptor expressed on natural killer cells and T cells, plays pivotal roles in immunity to microbial infections as well as in cancer immunosurveillance. This study examined the impact of donor and recipient polymorphisms in the NKG2D gene on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing allogeneic T-cell-replete myeloablative bone marrow transplantation using an HLA-matched unrelated donor. DESIGN AND METHODS The NKG2D polymorphism was retrospectively analyzed in a total 145 recipients with hematologic malignancies and their unrelated donors. The patients underwent transplantation following myeloablative conditioning; the recipients and donors were matched through the Japan Marrow Donor Program. RESULTS In patients with standard-risk disease, the donor NKG2D-HNK1 haplotype, a haplotype expected to induce greater natural killer cell activity, was associated with significantly improved overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.85; p=0.01) as well as transplant related mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.21 to 0.86; p=0.02), but had no impact on disease relapse or the development of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease or chronic graft-versus-host disease. The NKG2D polymorphism did not significantly influence the transplant outcomes in patients with high-risk disease. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest an association between the donor HNK1 haplotype and better clinical outcome among recipients, with standard-risk disease, of bone marrow transplants from HLA-matched unrelated donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Luis Espinoza
- Department of Hematology & Oncology, Kanazawa University Hospital, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, 920-8641, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD ) is a leading cause of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation-related mortality and morbidity. It is an immune-mediated disorder that can target almost any organ in the body, often with devastating consequences. The immune-suppressive medications currently used to treat it are equally toxic and are often not very effective. At this time, our understanding of its pathophysiology is limited. The discovery of potential biomarkers offers new possibilities in the clinical management of cGVHD. They could potentially be used for diagnosing cGVHD, for predicting or evaluating response to therapy and for unique insights into the pathophysiology underlying the clinical manifestations of cGVHD. Understanding the biological origins of these biomarkers can help us construct a more comprehensive and clinically relevant model for the pathogenesis of this disease. In this article, we review existing evidence for candidate biomarkers that have been identified in the framework of how they may contribute to the pathophysiology of cGVHD. Issues regarding the discovery and application of biomarkers are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Rozmus
- Division of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, Department of Pediatrics, BC Children’s Hospital/University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kirk R Schultz
- Division of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, Department of Pediatrics, BC Children’s Hospital/University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jenq RR, van den Brink MRM. Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: individualized stem cell and immune therapy of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2010; 10:213-21. [PMID: 20168320 DOI: 10.1038/nrc2804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 201] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The year 2009 marked the fiftieth anniversary of the first successful allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). The field of HSCT has pioneered some of the most exciting areas of research today. HSCT was the original stem cell therapy, the first cancer immune therapy and the earliest example of individualized cancer therapy. In this Timeline article we review the history of the development of HSCT and major advances made in the past 50 years. We highlight accomplishments made by researchers who continue to strive to improve outcomes for patients and increase the availability of this potentially life-saving therapy for patients with otherwise incurable malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert R Jenq
- Department of Immunology and Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|