High fractional concentration of nitric oxide in exhaled air despite steroid treatment in asthmatic children

Post viral bronchiolitis obliterans in children: A rare and potentially devastating disease

Post infectious bronchiolitis obliterans (PIBO) is a rare but severe disease in children. Several respiratory pathogens are incriminated but adenovirus is still the most represented. Risk factors are well described: the male gender, hypoxemia at diagnosis and required mechanical ventilation. No risk factor is linked to the newborn period. The clinical spectrum of PIBO is broad, ranging from asymptomatic patients with fixed airflow obstruction to severe respiratory insufficiency requiring continuous oxygen supplementation. Diagnosis includes a combination of a clinical history, absence of reversible airflow obstructions and ground glass and gas trapping on high resolution computed tomography. PIBO is primarily a neutrophilic pathology of small bronchioles characterized by high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines leading to tissue remodeling and fibrosis of the small airways. The difficulty is to discriminate between the host's normal response, an exaggerated inflammatory response and the potential iatrogenic consequences of the initial infection treatment, particularly prolonged mechanical ventilation. Damage to the respiratory epithelium with a possible link to viral infections are considered as potential mechanisms of PIBO. No specific management exists. Much remains to be done in this field to clarify the underlying mechanisms, identify biomarkers, and develop clear monitoring pathways and treatment protocols.

Addressing the risk domain in the long-term management of pediatric asthma

There is growing concern regarding the long-term outcomes of early and poorly controlled childhood asthma, either of which can potentially lead to the development of severe asthma in adults and irrecoverable loss of lung function leading to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These outcomes of inadequately controlled asthma should prompt a change in practice to better and/or earlier identify children at risk of adverse respiratory outcomes of asthma, to monitor disease progression, and to design intervention strategies that could either prevent or reverse asthma progression in children. The careful follow-up of spirometry over time-in the form of lung function trajectories, the application of biomarkers to assist in the diagnosis of early asthma and medication selection for these patients, as well as methods to identify patients at risk of asthma attacks-can be used to develop individualized management strategies for children with asthma. It is now time for asthma specialists to communicate this information to patients, parents, and primary care physicians and to incorporate them into routine clinical assessments of children with asthma. In time, these concepts of risk management and prevention can be refined to provide a more comprehensive approach to asthma care so as to prevent adverse respiratory outcomes from poorly controlled childhood asthma.

Eosinophilic airway inflammation is a main feature of unstable asthma in adolescents

BACKGROUND

Stability of asthma is a clinical phenotype of the disease based on long-term evaluation of control of asthma symptoms and its exacerbations. A relationship between airway inflammation and clinical classification of asthma based on stability criterion has not been well studied.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of our study was to analyze the inflammation profile of stable and unstable asthma in adolescents treated with moderate and high doses of inhaled corticosteroids.

METHODS

139 young asthmatics of 16.8 (3.25) years were classified in the stable group (N = 72) and unstable group (N = 67) after a 3-month prospective observation. Inflammatory markers including cytogram of the induced sputum (IS), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) following provocation with hypertonic saline and exercises, as well as clinical and spirometric parameters in both groups were compared.

RESULTS

75% of patients with unstable asthma revealed elevated percentage of eosinophils in the induced sputum (>2.5%), and mean values were significantly higher in comparison with stable asthma: 2.0 (0,5-4,2) vs 5,5 (2,6-11,3), p < 0,001. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness was markedly higher in unstable asthma, especially in asthma with eosinophilic profile; statistically significant differences also related to functional pulmonary tests. In multivariate analysis, asthma instability was significantly associated with sEos (p = 0.005), BHR (p = 0.001) but not FeNO (p = 0.24).

CONCLUSION (AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE)

Eosinophilic inflammation, relatively resistant to high doses of inhaled corticosteroids, is a dominant type of inflammation in unstable asthma in adolescents. Asthma instability is also associated with higher bronchial hyperresponsiveness and lower spirometric parameters. In the light of the new studies and progress in biological methods of therapy of eosinophilic inflammation, unstable asthma, especially in case of severe course, requires extended diagnostics with determination of inflammatory phenotype.

Exhaled Nitric Oxide: An Update

Fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is a biomarker used to identify allergic airway inflammation. Because it is noninvasive and easy to obtain, its utility has been studied in the diagnosis and management of several respiratory diseases. Much of the research has been done in asthma, and many studies support the use of FENO in aiding diagnosing asthma, predicting steroid responsiveness, and preventing exacerbations by guiding medication dosage and assessing adherence.

Ability of Exhaled Nitric Oxide to Discriminate for Airflow Obstruction Among Frequent Exacerbators of Clinically Diagnosed Asthma

OBJECTIVE

Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FE_NO) has been proposed as a non-invasive biomarker for allergic inflammation seen in asthma. Many asthmatics in clinical practice have never had spirometry and recent data report misdiagnoses in patients with physician diagnosed (PD) asthma. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of FE_NO to discriminate between those with and without airflow obstruction (AO) among patients with PD-asthma.

METHODS

Frequent exacerbators of PD-asthma (with 2 or more asthma exacerbations leading to emergency room visit or hospitalization within last 12 months) were enrolled. All patients underwent diagnostic evaluations including spirometry, FE_NO testing and serum immunoglobulin (IgE) and eosinophils. Serial spirometry and methacholine challenge testing (MCT) were performed as indicated. AO was defined by a decreased FEV1/FVC ratio (< 70% and/or < LLN), or a positive MCT.

RESULTS

Of the 222 patients with PD-asthma, AO was found in 136 (vs. 86 without AO). 81.6% of patients with AO and 66.2% without AO completed FE_NO testing. There was no significant difference in the mean FE_NO levels among patients with or without AO (40.8 vs. 30.4 ppb, P = 0.10). Likewise, there was no difference in the serum IgE levels and serum eosinophils.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analyses suggest that FE_NO levels do not help discriminate between those with and without AO in patients with PD-asthma. Patients who experience symptoms of asthma may have elevated FE_NO levels above the suggested cut points of 20-25 ppb. Objective confirmation of AO should be considered in all patients with PD-asthma, irrespective of FE_NO levels.

Omalizumab for severe asthma: toward personalized treatment based on biomarker profile and clinical history

Asthma is a heterogeneous syndrome with numerous underlining molecular and inflammatory mechanisms contributing to the wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes. Multiple therapies targeting severe asthma with type 2 (T2) high inflammation are or soon will be available. T2 high inflammation is defined as inflammation associated with atopy or eosinophilia or an increase in cytokines associated with T-helper 2 lymphocytes. Omalizumab is a humanized anti-IgE monoclonal antibody and the first biologic therapy approved for moderate-severe allergic asthma. Despite the specificity of biologic therapies like omalizumab, clinical response is variable, with approximately 50% of treated patients achieving the primary outcome. A prior identification of the ideal candidate for therapy would improve patient outcomes and optimize the use of health care resources. As the number of biologic therapies for asthma increases, the goal is identification of biomarkers or clinical phenotypes likely to respond to a specific therapy. This review focuses on potential biomarkers and clinical history that may identify responders to omalizumab therapy for asthma.

Biologic and New Therapies in Asthma

Several biologics are currently FDA approved for asthma that target Th2 high patients. Unfortunately, 50% of patients with severe asthma do not fit this phenotype of disease and have fewer effective therapeutic options. In the clinical setting, total IgE, FeNO and peripheral blood eosinophils are important tools in defining Th2 high patients with asthma. However, precise biomarkers to predict better response to one specific Th2 high asthma therapy versus another is lacking. It is important to recognize that none of the current medications targeting the Th2 pathway induces persistent immunomodulation or remission.

Biomarkers in asthmatic patients: Has their time come to direct treatment?

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease with multiple phenotypes that have variable risk factors and responses to therapeutics. Mild-to-moderate asthma often responds to traditional medications, whereas severe disease can be refractory to inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting β-agonists, and leukotriene receptor antagonists. There is robust research into the variable phenotypes of asthma. Biomarkers help define the specific pathophysiology of different asthma phenotypes and identify potential therapeutic targets. The following review will discuss the current use of biomarkers for the diagnosis of asthma, triaging the severity of a patient's disease, and the potential efficacy of treatments. This information can be used to define certain patient populations that are more likely to respond to inhaled corticosteroids or biologics. As knowledge of patient phenotypes and endotypes and biological agents to target specific classes of asthma emerge, the ability to provide personalized care to asthmatic patients will follow.

Exhaled nitric oxide in relation to asthma control: A real-life survey

BACKGROUND

Asthma is characterised by chronic airway inflammation, a complex cascade of events, mostly sustained by eosinophil recruitment and activation. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a surrogate marker of airway inflammation closely associated with bronchial eosinophilia. FeNO is used to define asthma phenotype, to assess eosinophilic inflammatory severity and to predict corticosteroid responsiveness.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether FeNO may be associated with some clinical and functional factors in asthmatics evaluated in a real life setting.

METHODS

Globally 363 patients (150 males, mean age 46.3 years) with asthma were consecutively evaluated. The following parameters were assessed: history, including comorbidities, physical examination, body mass index (BMI), lung function, asthma control grade, asthma control test (ACT), and FeNO.

RESULTS

FeNO values were significantly higher in patients with poorly controlled asthma (p<0.01), asthma symptoms (p=0.015), wheezing (p<0.001), rhinitis diagnosis, (p=0.049) and rhinitis symptoms (p=0.019), but lower in patients with GERD (p=0.024) and pneumonia history (p=0.048). FeNO values increased in patients with the lowest corticosteroid dose (p=0.031). FeNO values>25ppb were associated with poorly controlled asthma (OR 3.71), asthma signs (OR 3.5) and symptoms (OR 1.79). A FeNO value cut-off of 29.9ppb was fairly predictive of (AUC 0.7) poorly controlled asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

FeNO assessment in clinical practice may be a useful tool for monitoring asthmatics as it is associated with several clinical factors, including asthma control.

Exhaled nitric oxide monitoring does not reduce exacerbation frequency or inhaled corticosteroid dose in paediatric asthma: a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Inhaled corticosteroid therapy (ICS) for asthma is currently modified according to symptoms and lung function. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) has been demonstrated to be a non-invasive marker of eosinophilic inflammation. Studies of FENO-driven asthma management show variable success. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether monitoring FENO can improve outpatient management of children with moderate to severe asthma using a pragmatic design.

METHODS

Children aged 6–17 years with moderate to severe asthma were recruited. Their asthma was stabilised before randomisation to FENO-driven therapy or to a standard management group where therapy was driven by conventional markers of asthma control. ICS or long-acting bronchodilator therapies were altered according to FENO levels in combination with reported symptoms in the FENO group. Participants were assessed 2 monthly for 12 months. ICS dose and exacerbation frequency change were compared between groups in an intention to treat analysis.

RESULTS

Ninety children were randomised. No difference was found between the two groups in either change in corticosteroid dose or exacerbation frequency. Results were similar in a planned secondary analysis of atopic asthmatics.

CONCLUSION

FENO-guided ICS titration does not appear to reduce corticosteroid usage or exacerbation frequency in paediatric outpatients with moderate to severe asthma. This may reflect limitations in FENO-driven management algorithms, as there are now concerns that FENO levels relate to atopy as much as they relate to asthma control.

Evaluation of switching low-dose inhaled corticosteroid to pranlukast for step-down therapy in well-controlled patients with mild persistent asthma

OBJECTIVE

Treatment guidelines for asthma recommend step-down therapy for well-controlled asthma patients. However, the precise strategy for step-down therapy has not been well defined. We investigated whether well-controlled patients with mild persistent asthma can tolerate a step-down therapy of either a reduced dose of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) or a switch to a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA), pranlukast hydrate.

METHODS

We recruited 40 adult patients with mild persistent asthma who were well-controlled for at least 3 months with a low-dose ICS therapy. The patients were randomly assigned to either an ICS dose reduction or a switch to pranlukast for 6 months.

RESULTS

FeNO levels in the pranlukast group were significantly increased over that in the ICS group. There were no significant differences between the two groups for lung function, FOT, at the endpoint. The percentage of patients with controlled asthma was 72.2% in the pranlukast group and 90% in the ICS group. No statistically significant difference between the two groups in the percentages of patients with treatment failure was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with mild persistent asthma that is well-controlled by a low dose of ICS can be switched to pranlukast safely for at least 6 months. However, 27.8% of the pranlukast group failed to maintain well-control, and FeNO levels increased with the switch to pranlukast at 6 months. This study was been limited by the small sample size and should therefore be considered preliminary. Further studies are needed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of LTRA monotherapy as a step-down therapy.

Diagnostic accuracy of minimally invasive markers for detection of airway eosinophilia in asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic airway inflammation is associated with increased corticosteroid responsiveness in asthma, but direct airway sampling methods are invasive or laborious. Minimally invasive markers for airway eosinophilia could present an alternative method, but estimates of their accuracy vary.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and searched Medline, Embase, and PubMed for studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of markers against a reference standard of induced sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage, or endobronchial biopsy in patients with asthma or suspected asthma (for inception to Aug 1, 2014). Unpublished results were obtained by contacting authors of studies that did not report on diagnostic accuracy, but had data from which estimates could be calculated. We assessed risk of bias with QUADAS-2. We used meta-analysis to produce summary estimates of accuracy.

FINDINGS

We included 32 studies: 24 in adults and eight in children. Of these, 26 (81%) showed risk of bias in at least one domain. In adults, three markers had extensively been investigated: fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) (17 studies; 3216 patients; summary area under the receiver operator curve [AUC] 0·75 [95% CI 0·72-0·78]); blood eosinophils (14 studies; 2405 patients; 0·78 [0·74-0·82]); total IgE (seven studies; 942 patients; 0·65 [0·61-0·69]). In children, only FeNO (six studies; 349 patients; summary AUC 0·81 [0·72-0·89]) and blood eosinophils (three studies; 192 patients; 0·78 [0·71-0·85]) had been investigated in more than one study. Induced sputum was most frequently used as the reference standard. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity in detecting sputum eosinophils of 3% or more in adults were: 0·66 (0·57-0·75) and 0·76 (0·65-0·85) for FeNO; 0·71 (0·65-0·76) and 0·77 (0·70-0·83) for blood eosinophils; and 0·64 (0·42-0·81) and 0·71 (0·42-0·89) for IgE.

INTERPRETATION

FeNO, blood eosinophils, and IgE have moderate diagnostic accuracy. Their use as a single surrogate marker for airway eosinophilia in patients with asthma will lead to a substantial number of false positives or false negatives.

FUNDING

None.

Exhaled nitric oxide and the management of childhood asthma--yet another promising biomarker "has been" or a misunderstood gem

Childhood asthma is a common chronic condition. Approximately five percent of all children in western countries are prescribed treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to prevent asthma symptoms. Current guidelines advocate titrating ICS dose to symptoms but this approach is not without problem, e.g. how to discern asthmatic from non-asthmatic symptoms? And when to reduce ICS dose? This review describes the strengths and weaknesses of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) as an objective index for individualising asthma control in children. Epidemiological and mechanistic evidence suggest that FENO should be a promising biomarker for eosinophilic airway inflammation (a hall mark for asthma) but somewhat surprisingly, clinical trials in children have not consistently found benefit from adding FENO to a symptom-based approach to ICS treatment in children. There are a number of reasons why FENO has apparently failed to translate from promising biomarker to clinically useful tool, and one reason may be a lack of understanding of what merits a significant intrasubject change in FENO. This review describes the rise and apparent fall of FENO as biomarker for asthma and then focuses on more recent evidence which suggest that FENO may prove to have a role in the management of childhood asthma, and in particular preventing exacerbations.

Revisiting the role of exhaled nitric oxide in asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on the most recent studies investigating fractional nitric oxide concentration in exhaled breath (FeNO) as a useful biomarker for identifying specific phenotypes in asthma and as a tool for asthma diagnosis, monitoring and clinical decision-making.

RECENT FINDINGS

On the basis of the current literature, it has been highlighted that FeNO is a clinically relevant marker in various clinical aspects of asthma: FeNO is a predictor for developing asthma in persistent rhinitis or in infants with respiratory symptoms; FeNO contributes to identification of asthma phenotypes in both children and adults, also in relation to severity; FeNO is useful in monitoring the effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids (including compliance) and biologic treatments like omalizumab; FeNO, in conjunction with symptom registration and lung function measurements, contributes to asthma diagnosis and optimizes asthma management.

SUMMARY

FeNO provides further information in distinguishing different phenotypes in asthma, allowing a much more appropriate control of the disease, especially in patients with difficult/severe asthma. In the future, it would be interesting to shed light on the hidden biological mechanisms responsible for low or normal FeNO values in symptomatic asthmatic patients.

Asthma exacerbations: predisposing factors and prediction rules

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Asthma is a multifaceted disease that is associated with decreased lung function, multiple symptoms, varying levels of asthma control, and risk of acute exacerbations. The ability to predict the risk of developing acute exacerbations may improve the management of asthmatics and facilitate identification of these patients for interventional studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Factors that are associated with different manifestations of asthma differ. Biomarkers that are correlated with airways hyper-responsiveness do not necessarily correlate with risk of future exacerbations. Genetic factors that segregate with exacerbation risk are beginning to emerge. Outcome measures that demonstrate predictive validity have been developed and may facilitate patient management and provide novel clinically meaningful endpoints in clinical trials.

SUMMARY

This review will emphasize underlying factors associated with asthma exacerbations and clinical prediction rules that correlate with the risk of developing severe exacerbations of asthma.

Guideline-recommended fractional exhaled nitric oxide is a poor predictor of health-care use among inner-city children and adolescents receiving usual asthma care

BACKGROUND

American Thoracic Society guidelines support using fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) measurements in patients with asthma and highlight gaps in the evidence base. Little is known about the use of FENO levels to predict asthma exacerbations among high-risk, urban, minority populations receiving usual care.

METHODS

Children with persistent asthma (n = 138) were enrolled in a prospective, observational cohort study and skin tested at baseline (a wheal ≥ 3 mm indicated a positive skin-prick test). FENO levels, lung function, and asthma-related health-care use were assessed at baseline and every 3 months thereafter for 1 year. Relationships between FENO levels and health-care use in the subsequent 3 months were examined. Final models accounted for repeated outcome measures and were adjusted for age, sex, and lung function.

RESULTS

The mean age of the children was 11 years (range, 5-17 years), and most were male (57%), black (91%), and atopic (90%). At baseline, the median FENO level was 31.5 parts per billion (interquartile range, 16-61 ppb) and mean FEV1/FVC was 80.7% (SD, ± 9.6%). There were 237 acute asthma-related health-care visits, 105 unscheduled doctor visits, 125 ED visits, and seven hospitalizations during the follow-up period. FENO level was not a significant predictor of acute visits, ED visits, unscheduled doctor visits, or hospitalization in either unadjusted or adjusted analyses. Use of recommended cut points did not improve the predictive value of the FENO level (positive predictive value, 0.6%-32.8%) nor did application of the guideline-based algorithm to assess change over time.

CONCLUSIONS

FENO level may not be a clinically useful predictor of health-care use for asthma exacerbations in urban minority children with asthma.

Predictors for identifying the efficacy of systemic steroids on sustained exhaled nitric oxide elevation in severe asthma

BACKGROUND

Some patients with asthma have high levels of exhaled nitric oxide fraction (FENO) despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) therapy. Early studies suggested that this might be explained by the presence of heterogeneous airway inflammation. We aimed to assess the predictors for identifying the efficacy of systemic corticosteroids on residual FENO elevations in severe asthma.

METHODS

Twenty severe asthmatics with persistent FENO elevation (≥40ppb) despite maintenance therapy including high-daily-dose ICS were enrolled. Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), lung function, blood eosinophils, and FENO were assessed before and after 14 days treatment with 0.5mg/kg oral prednisolone/day.

RESULTS

ACQ, blood eosinophils, FENO level, FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC ratio and the slope of the single nitrogen washout curve (ΔN2) were significantly improved by treatment with prednisolone. 70% of the subjects showed ≥20% reductions in the FENO levels. The reduction in FENO levels was significantly correlated with the improvements in ACQ (p < 0.0001), FVC (p < 0.01), FEV1 (p < 0.0001), and ΔN2 (p < 0.05). Among the measurements at baseline, the FENO levels and blood eosinophil numbers were identified as significant predictors of ≥20% reductions in the FENO levels by systemic steroid therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic corticosteroids could suppress the residual FENO elevations in more than half of the patients with severe asthma and the reduction in FENO levels was associated with improvements in asthma control and airflow limitation. The FENO levels and blood eosinophil numbers were the predictors of improved residual airway inflammation by systemic steroid therapy in severe asthma.

Clinical application of exhaled nitric oxide measurement in pediatric lung diseases

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a non invasive method for assessing the inflammatory status of children with airway disease. Different ways to measure FeNO levels are currently available. The possibility of measuring FeNO levels in an office setting even in young children, and the commercial availability of portable devices, support the routine use of FeNO determination in the daily pediatric practice. Although many confounding factors may affect its measurement, FeNO is now widely used in the management of children with asthma, and seems to provide significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than lung function or bronchial challenge tests. The role of FeNO in airway infection (e.g. viral bronchiolitis and common acquired pneumonia), in bronchiectasis, or in cases with diffuse lung disease is less clear. This review focuses on the most recent advances and the current clinical applications of FeNO measurement in pediatric lung disease.

Associated demographics of persistent exhaled nitric oxide elevation in treated asthmatics

BACKGROUND

The fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is reduced by anti-inflammatory treatment in asthma. However, the FENO level is also regulated by individual demographics and there is considerable variation among clinically stable patients.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that some demographics may be responsible for persistent FENO elevation despite inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) therapy in asthma.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study. We initially screened 250 stable asthmatics and determined the FENO cut-off point for identifying poorly controlled asthma defined by one of the following criteria: Asthma control test <20, or forced expiratory volume in one-second % of predicted <80%, or peak expiratory flow variability <80% (Study 1). After 12-weeks, 229 patients who maintained high or low FENO were selected and the independent factors which might contribute to a high FENO were examined (Study 2).

RESULTS

A FENO level >39.5 p.p.b. yielded 67% sensitivity and 76% specificity for identifying the patients with poorly controlled asthma. The persistent high FENO group (≥ 40 p.p.b.) was more likely to be ex-smokers, to show evidence of atopy (positive specific IgE, higher serum IgE and blood eosinophils), and to have allergic comorbidities. Especially, past smoking history, blood eosinophils, and chronic rhinosinusitis were identified to be independent predictors of high FENO. Neither the dose of ICS nor other medication use showed any difference between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These results suggested that past smoking history, blood eosinophilia, and chronic rhinosinusitis are involved in the persistent airway inflammation detected by FENO. Although their relative contributions on FENO values should be further quantified, clarification of the features of the subjects with high FENO might provide clues for adjustment of the treatment approach in asthma.

Exhaled nitric oxide

Nitric oxide (NO) is now considered an important biomarker for respiratory disease. Studies have confirmed that the fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is elevated in the airways of patients who have asthma in comparison with controls. The level of FENO correlates well with the presence and level of inflammation, and decreases with glucocorticoid treatment. NO has potential to be used not only as a diagnostic aid but also as a management tool for assessing severity, monitoring response to therapy, and gaining control of asthma symptoms. This article reviews the biology of NO and its role in respiratory disease.

Asthma outcomes: biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Measurement of biomarkers has been incorporated within clinical research studies of asthma to characterize the population and associate the disease with environmental and therapeutic effects.

OBJECTIVE

National Institutes of Health institutes and federal agencies convened an expert group to propose which biomarkers should be assessed as standardized asthma outcomes in future clinical research studies.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of the literature to identify studies that developed and/or tested asthma biomarkers. We identified biomarkers relevant to the underlying disease process progression and response to treatment. We classified the biomarkers as either core (required in future studies), supplemental (used according to study aims and standardized), or emerging (requiring validation and standardization). This work was discussed at an National Institutes of Health-organized workshop convened in March 2010 and finalized in September 2011.

RESULTS

Ten measures were identified; only 1, multiallergen screening to define atopy, is recommended as a core asthma outcome. Complete blood counts to measure total eosinophils, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno), sputum eosinophils, urinary leukotrienes, and total and allergen-specific IgE are recommended as supplemental measures. Measurement of sputum polymorphonuclear leukocytes and other analytes, cortisol measures, airway imaging, breath markers, and system-wide studies (eg, genomics, proteomics) are considered as emerging outcome measures.

CONCLUSION

The working group participants propose the use of multiallergen screening in all asthma clinical trials to characterize study populations with respect to atopic status. Blood, sputum, and urine specimens should be stored in biobanks, and standard procedures should be developed to harmonize sample collection for clinical trial biorepositories.

An official ATS clinical practice guideline: interpretation of exhaled nitric oxide levels (FENO) for clinical applications

BACKGROUND

Measurement of fractional nitric oxide (NO) concentration in exhaled breath (Fe(NO)) is a quantitative, noninvasive, simple, and safe method of measuring airway inflammation that provides a complementary tool to other ways of assessing airways disease, including asthma. While Fe(NO) measurement has been standardized, there is currently no reference guideline for practicing health care providers to guide them in the appropriate use and interpretation of Fe(NO) in clinical practice.

PURPOSE

To develop evidence-based guidelines for the interpretation of Fe(NO) measurements that incorporate evidence that has accumulated over the past decade.

METHODS

We created a multidisciplinary committee with expertise in the clinical care, clinical science, or basic science of airway disease and/or NO. The committee identified important clinical questions, synthesized the evidence, and formulated recommendations. Recommendations were developed using pragmatic systematic reviews of the literature and the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

The evidence related to the use of Fe(NO) measurements is reviewed and clinical practice recommendations are provided.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of chronic inflammatory airway disease including asthma, conventional tests such as FEV(1) reversibility or provocation tests are only indirectly associated with airway inflammation. Fe(NO) offers added advantages for patient care including, but not limited to (1) detecting of eosinophilic airway inflammation, (2) determining the likelihood of corticosteroid responsiveness, (3) monitoring of airway inflammation to determine the potential need for corticosteroid, and (4) unmasking of otherwise unsuspected nonadherence to corticosteroid therapy.

Using biomarkers in the assessment of airways disease

A biomarker provides a window on underlying disease activity. This is helpful when the pathology, treatment response, or both are heterogeneous or when trying to interpret nonspecific respiratory symptoms in patients with comorbidities. The successful application of a biomarker result is critically dependent on the specific question being addressed and the performance characteristics of the biomarker in relation to that question in the context of pretest probabilities. Negative prediction might be the best way to use a biomarker, such as a D-dimer, pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and exhaled nitric oxide. In this review the role of biomarkers in airways disease (notably induced sputum eosinophils and exhaled nitric oxide) is considered in relation to risk stratification, identification of treatment responders, identification of a clinical phenotype, monitoring of disease, and new drug development.

Inflammatory markers in childhood asthma

The major characteristic of asthma is persistent airway inflammation that fails to resolve spontaneously. Dysregulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory mechanisms is responsible for the development of chronic inflammation. The inflammatory reaction is mediated by numerous cells and their mediators. Detection and quantification of airway inflammation in children are subject to many requirements, e.g., use of biologic samples obtained in a non-invasive way; use of standardized analytical methods to determine biomarkers that can identify inflammation processes (inflammation itself, oxidative stress, apoptosis and remodelling); determining the role of systemic inflammation; assessment of correlation of various biomarkers of inflammation with clinical parameters and their diagnostic efficacy; providing a tool(s) to monitor diseases, and to evaluate adequacy of therapy; and predicting the clinical course of inflammation and prognosis of asthma. Using standardized analyses, it is now possible to determine direct markers of local inflammation, i.e., fractional nitric oxide (marker of oxidative stress) in exhaled breath, pH (marker of acid stress) in breath condensate, and indirect markers in blood/serum, i.e., eosinophil granulocytes (indicating migration), eosinophil cationic protein (marker of activated eosinophil granulocytes) and C-reactive protein (marker of systemic inflammation). However, none of these biomarkers are specific for asthma. Further standardization of the known pulmonary biomarkers of local inflammation and identification of new ones will allow for longitudinal follow-up of inflammation in children with asthma.

Exhaled nitric oxide in pulmonary diseases: a comprehensive review

The upregulation of nitric oxide (NO) by inflammatory cytokines and mediators in central and peripheral airway sites can be monitored easily in exhaled air. It is now possible to estimate the predominant site of increased fraction of exhaled NO (FeNO) and its potential pathologic and physiologic role in various pulmonary diseases. In asthma, increased FeNO reflects eosinophilic-mediated inflammatory pathways moderately well in central and/or peripheral airway sites and implies increased inhaled and systemic corticosteroid responsiveness. Recently, five randomized controlled algorithm asthma trials reported only equivocal benefits of adding measurements of FeNO to usual clinical guideline management including spirometry; however, significant design issues may exist. Overall, FeNO measurement at a single expiratory flow rate of 50 mL/s may be an important adjunct for diagnosis and management in selected cases of asthma. This may supplement standard clinical asthma care guidelines, including spirometry, providing a noninvasive window into predominantly large-airway-presumed eosinophilic inflammation. In COPD, large/central airway maximal NO flux and peripheral/small airway/alveolar NO concentration may be normal and the role of FeNO monitoring is less clear and therefore less established than in asthma. Furthermore, concurrent smoking reduces FeNO. Monitoring FeNO in pulmonary hypertension and cystic fibrosis has opened up a window to the role NO may play in their pathogenesis and possible clinical benefits in the management of these diseases.

Long term performance characteristics of an electrochemical nitric oxide analyser

BACKGROUND

The NIOX MINO(®) is a nitric oxide (FE(NO)) analyser based on electrochemical technology. It includes a replaceable sensor. Quality control procedures are recommended, but regular calibration is not possible. We aimed to evaluate the performance characteristics of the NIOX MINO(®) to identify if reproducibility changed over time, or with different sensors. Also, there are reports that reproducibility of FE(NO) may be reduced in patients with high FE(NO): our secondary aim was to address this issue.

METHODS

Reproducibility in 24 separate sensor-analyser units was calculated on three occasions over two months in 17 patients. These included 9 patients whose FE(NO) was high (mean 80 ppb) and 8 in whom FE(NO) was low (mean 16 ppb).

RESULTS

One device failed quality control testing. For the remaining 23 sensor-analyser combinations, the mean coefficient of variation was 4.0% (range 1.2-7.2%) at baseline, 3.6% (range 2.0-7.0) at one month, and 3.6% (range 1.6-7.6%) at two months. The 95% C.I. for the mean limits of agreement for FE(NO) was ± 4.2 ppb (range 0.9-9.6 ppb), ± 3.8 ppb (range 1.6-6.9 ppb) and ± 3.2 ppb (range 1.2-6.8 ppb) respectively (NS). The limits of agreement exceeded the manufacturer's specifications (± 5 ppb) in 0 devices at baseline, 3 (13%) at one month, and 5 (22%) at two months.

CONCLUSIONS

Reproducibility of FE(NO) using the NIOX MINO(®) was within clinically acceptable limits (± 10 ppb) and was generally stable. However, with time, a proportion of individual sensor-analyser combinations yielded variability outside the manufacturer's specifications.

Factors attributable to the level of exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatic children

Background

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease with variable symptoms especially in children. Exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) has proved to be a marker of inflammation in the airways and has become a substantial part of clinical management of asthmatic children due to its potential to predict possible exacerbation and adjust the dose of inhalant corticosteroids.

Objectives

We analyzed potential factors that contribute to the variability of nitric oxide in various clinical and laboratory conditions.

Materials and methods

Study population consisted of 222 asthmatic children and 27 healthy control subjects. All children underwent a panel of tests: fractioned exhaled nitric oxide, exhaled carbon monoxide, asthma control test scoring, blood sampling, skin prick tests, and basic spirometry.

Results

FeNO and other investigated parameters widely changed according to clinical or laboratory characteristics of the tested children. Asthmatics showed increased levels of FeNO, exhaled carbon monoxide, total serum IgE, and higher eosinophilia. Boys had higher FeNO levels than girls. We found a significant positive correlation between FeNO levels and the percentage of blood eosinophils, %predicted of forced vital capacity, total serum IgE levels, and increasing age.

Conclusions

Various phenotypes of children's asthma are characterized by specific pattern of the results of clinical and laboratory tests. FeNO correlates with total serum IgE, blood eosinophilia, age, and some spirometric parameters with different strength. Therefore, the coexistence of atopy, concomitant allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis, and some other parameters should be considered in critical evaluation of FeNO in the management of asthmatic children.

Relationship between exhaled nitric oxide and IgE sensitisation in patients with asthma: influence of steroid treatment

INTRODUCTION

The influence of the degree of immunoglobulin E (IgE) sensitisation on the fraction of expired nitric oxide (FE(NO)) in asthma patients being treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is not well known.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relationship between IgE sensitisation and FE(NO), and the effect of a step-up in ICS treatment on this relationship, in patients with allergic asthma.

METHODS

A primary health care centre recruited 20 non-smoking patients with perennial allergic asthma (18 years-50 years, six male) outside the pollen season. At every visit (0, 2, 4, 8 weeks), FE(NO) was measured and an exposure questionnaire was completed. ICS dose was adjusted according to FE(NO) (>or=22 ppb prescribed increase in ICS). Quantitative analyses of serum IgE (eight common aeroallergens) confirmed allergy.

RESULTS

At baseline, FE(NO) and the sum of IgE antibody titres for perennial allergens correlated significantly (r = 0.47, P = 0.04). After a step-up in ICS treatment, this correlation had disappeared. Nine patients had persistently elevated FE(NO) at last visit (mean 35 ppb vs 16 ppb). This group was more frequently exposed to relevant allergens or colds (89% vs 27% of patients, P < 0.05) and had higher IgE antibody titres (perennial allergens) compared with the normalised group (mean 28.9 kU/L vs 10.7 kU/L, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Serum IgE against perennial allergens and FE(NO) correlate in patients with allergic asthma. However, this relationship disappears after a high-dose ICS regimen, suggesting that FE(NO) relates to bronchial inflammation and not IgE levels per se. High degree of IgE sensitisation together with allergen exposure may lead to ICS-resistant airways inflammation.

Biomarkers in asthma and allergic rhinitis

A biological marker (biomarker) is a physical sign or laboratory measurement that can serve as an indicator of biological or pathophysiological processes or as a response to a therapeutic intervention. An applicable biomarker possesses the characteristics of clinical relevance (sensitivity and specificity for the disease) and is responsive to treatment effects, in combination with simplicity, reliability and repeatability of the sampling technique. Presently, there are several biomarkers for asthma and allergic rhinitis that can be obtained by non-invasive or semi-invasive airway sampling methods meeting at least some of these criteria. In clinical practice, such biomarkers can provide complementary information to conventional disease markers, including clinical signs, spirometry and PC(20)methacholine or histamine. Consequently, biomarkers can aid to establish the diagnosis, in staging and monitoring of the disease activity/progression or in predicting or monitoring of a treatment response. Especially in (young) children, reliable, non-invasive biomarkers would be valuable. Apart from diagnostic purposes, biomarkers can also be used as (surrogate) markers to predict a (novel) drug's efficacy in target populations. Therefore, biomarkers are increasingly applied in early drug development. When implementing biomarkers in clinical practice or trials of asthma and allergic rhinitis, it is important to consider the heterogeneous nature of the inflammatory response which should direct the selection of adequate biomarkers. Some biomarker sampling techniques await further development and/or validation, and should therefore be applied as a "back up" of established biomarkers or methods. In addition, some biomarkers or sampling techniques are less suitable for (very young) children. Hence, on a case by case basis, a decision needs to be made what biomarker is adequate for the target population or purpose pursued. Future development of more sophisticated sampling methods and quantification techniques, such as--omics and biomedical imaging, will enable detection of adequate biomarkers for both clinical and research applications.

Exhaled nitric oxide in the diagnosis and management of childhood asthma

The management of asthma in children and adolescents is currently guided by assessment of clinical symptoms, exacerbation risk and spirometric measure of lung function. The use of biomarkers, an objective measure which indicates normal or pathophysiologic processes and/or the response to a treatment intervention, could greatly enhance the efficacy and safety of current algorithms. Measurement of the fraction of expired nitric oxide in exhaled air (FeNO) has been suggested as a readily determined biomarker that can aid in the diagnosis and management of asthma. FeNO has been used to identify steroid responsive patients, adjust the dose of controller medications, most notably inhaled corticosteroids, and predict relapse during medication taper. In spite of early enthusiasm for the utility of this measure, more recent data suggest a more limited role for FeNO. This review will focus on the use of FeNO in the diagnosis and management of asthma in children and adolescents.

The link between exhaled NO and bronchomotor tone depends on the dose of inhaled steroid in asthma

BACKGROUND

Exhaled NO (FE(NO)) is a steroid dose dependent eosinophilic inflammometer, but also a mediator of bronchomotor tone, but statistically significant relationships have infrequently been obtained with pulmonary function tests (PFT). The aim was to test the hypothesis that the relationships between FE(NO) and PFT could be uncovered by inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment, namely that a link between FE(NO) and bronchodilator response (an index of bronchomotor tone) would appear under ICS.

METHODS

Exhaled NO, forced expiratory flows and lung volumes were measured in atopic asthmatic children without recent (one month) respiratory symptoms.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty children (mean + or - SD, age: 11.2 + or - 2.5 years, 69 girls) were included (% predicted, FEV(1): 100 + or - 14; FEF(50%): 76 + or - 23; RV: 107 + or - 29). The relationship between ICS dose (GINA classification) and FE(NO) plateaued in children with an ICS dose higher than 200 microg beclomethasone equipotent daily dose: FE(NO) (median [25th-75th percentiles]), 43 ppb [15-105] (no treatment, n=65), 33 ppb [15-77] (low dose, n=70), 23 ppb [12-57] (medium dose, n=57) and 26 ppb [9-49] (high dose, n=38). Statistically significant relationships between FE(NO) and PFT were only observed in children receiving more than 200 microg/day ICS: with FEV(1) (medium ICS dose: rho=0.43, p=0.001; high dose: rho=0.32, p=0.052) and bronchodilator (400 microg salbutamol) response (medium dose: rho=0.54, p=0.001; high dose: rho=0.65, p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

A positive correlation between FE(NO) and bronchomotor tone appears with increasing ICS doses in atopic children with clinically controlled asthma, which further suggests that children depicting the highest FE(NO) values may have lesser steroid sensitivity.

Diagnostic value of exhaled nitric oxide in childhood asthma and allergy

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO) ) has been proposed as a diagnostic test of asthma. We aimed to investigate in a population based birth cohort of children the usefulness of FE(NO) as a diagnostic tool. The 10-yr follow up of the Environment and Childhood Asthma Study in Oslo included 616 children representative of the prospective birth cohort. Both FE(NO) (single breath technique) and skin prick test (SPT) were measured in 331, limited at the time by equipment availability. Structural parental interview, spirometry, methacholine challenge and exercise test were performed. FE(NO) was significantly elevated in children with current asthma (geometric mean 9.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) (6.9, 13.4) p.p.b.) compared with healthy children (5.8 (5.4, 6.3) p.p.b.; p < 0.001). FE(NO) was highest among children with current allergic asthma (asthma and positive SPT) (14.0 (8.9, 22.1) p.p.b.), whereas children with non-allergic asthma (6.1 (4.0, 9.2) p.p.b.) had comparable FE(NO) levels to healthy children (p = 0.99). Allergic sensitization was most closely associated with FE(NO) . A FE(NO) cut-off value of 20.4 p.p.b. had a high specificity (0.97), but a low sensitivity (0.41) and a Positive Likelihood Ratio of 16.1 for current allergic asthma. In the present childhood population-based study, high FE(NO) levels were closely associated with current allergic asthma and not with current asthma without allergic sensitization. Estimating the individual predictive probability of having asthma by use of FE(NO,) improves the diagnostic utility of the test.

Exhaled nitric oxide as a predictor of exacerbation in children with moderate-to-severe asthma: a prospective, 5-month study

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are recommended as the first line of treatment in children with moderate-to-severe asthma. Exhaled nitric oxide (ENO) has been proposed as a clinically useful marker of control that might help identify patients in whom ICS dose may be safely reduced.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability of ENO to predict future asthma exacerbations in children with moderate-to-severe asthma undergoing ICS tapering.

METHODS

This is an observational study with no control group. ENO was measured biweekly for 14 weeks in 32 children with moderate-to-severe asthma who were undergoing ICS tapering. Clinical evaluations and spirometry were performed concomitantly, and families kept daily diaries to record symptoms between visits. We used generalized estimating equations to model the In (odds) of an asthma exacerbation in the subsequent 2-week interval as a function of ENO level at the start of the interval while adjusting for age, sex, asthma severity, and current medication use.

RESULTS

We were able to successfully lower ICS doses in 10 (56%) of the 18 children with moderate asthma and in 3 (21%) of the 14 children with severe asthma. In 83 of the 187 follow-up clinical evaluations, children were determined to have had an exacerbation during the preceding 2 weeks. ENO levels, whether expressed as a continuous variable or dichotomized, were not associated with future risk for exacerbations in either unadjusted or adjusted models.

CONCLUSION

ENO was not a useful clinical predictor of future asthma exacerbations for children with moderate-to-severe asthma undergoing ICS tapering.

The strategy for predicting future exacerbation of asthma using a combination of the Asthma Control Test and lung function test

BACKGROUND

Various factors have been reported to be useful for predicting future exacerbations.

OBJECTIVE

This study was intended to determine a usefulness of a combination of a patient-based questionnaire, such as the Asthma Control Test (ACT) score with objective assessments, such as forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and/or exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)), for predicting future exacerbations in adult asthmatics.

METHODS

We therefore enrolled 78 subjects with mild to moderate asthma, who were clinically stable for 3 months who all had been regularly receiving inhaled steroid treatment. All subjects underwent a routine assessment of asthma control including the ACT score, spirometry, and FE(NO), and then were followed up until a severe exacerbation occurred. The predictors of an increased risk of severe exacerbation were identified and validated using decision trees based on a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. The properties of the developed models were the evaluated with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) (95% confidence interval [CI]).

RESULTS

The CART analysis automatically selected the variables and cut-off points, the ACT score <or=23 and FEV(1) <or= 91.8%, with the greatest capacity for discriminating future exacerbations within one year or not. When the probability was calculated by the likelihood ratio of a positive test (LP), the ACT score <or=23 was identified with a 60.3% probability, calculated by 1.82 of LP, whereas the combined ACT score <or=23 and the percentage of predicted FEV(1) <or= 91.8% were identified with an 85.0% probability, calculated by an LP score of 5.43, for predicting future exacerbation.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrated that combining the ACT score and percentage of predicted FEV(1), but not FE(NO,) can sufficiently stratify the risk for future exacerbations within one year.

Exhaled nitric oxide levels in asthma: Personal best versus reference values

BACKGROUND

Factors affecting the fraction of nitric oxide in exhaled air (FE(NO)) are multiple. Interpreting values when assessing airways disease may be problematic. Clinically optimum levels have not been defined.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to establish the relationship between predicted values for FE(NO) obtained from equations by Olin et al, Travers et al, and Dressel et al, and normalized levels after oral prednisone. We also compared postprednisone FE(NO) levels with those obtained during optimized treatment with inhaled fluticasone.

METHODS

Data were obtained before and after a trial of oral prednisone (30mg/d for 14 days), and also from a previously published study in which patients had their dose of inhaled corticosteroid adjusted using either FE(NO) or symptoms/lung function to optimize treatment.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients completed the study. The geometric mean FE(NO) after prednisone (17.7 parts per billion [ppb]; 95% CI, 15.5-20.2) was significantly lower than mean FE(NO) at the optimized fluticasone dose (20.2 ppb; 95% CI, 17.1-23.8; P=.04) and at loss of control (27.6 ppb; 95% CI, 22.8-33.4; P < .001). FE(NO) levels after prednisone did not differ significantly from the predicted values of Olin et al (16.8 ppb, 95% CI, 16.0-17.5; P=.44), but were significantly lower than values of Travers et al (predicted, 21.5 ppb; 95% CI, 20.9-22.2; P=.005) and Dressel et al (predicted, 27.8 ppb; 95% CI, 26.7-28.9; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Optimum FE(NO) levels are best established by using oral rather than inhaled steroid treatment, and these approximate to predicted values from the reference equation by Olin et al. However, at optimized doses of inhaled corticosteroid, although FE(NO) levels were higher than predicted, asthma was well controlled. Targeting FE(NO) on reference values is not justified.

Using fractional exhaled nitric oxide to guide asthma therapy: design and methodological issues for ASthma TReatment ALgorithm studies

BACKGROUND

Current asthma guidelines recommend treatment based on the assessment of asthma control using symptoms and lung function. Noninvasive markers are an attractive way to modify therapy since they offer improved selection of active treatment(s) based on individual response, and improved titration of treatment using markers that are better related to treatment outcomes.

AIMS

To review the methodological and design features of noninvasive marker studies in asthma.

METHODS

Systematic assessment of published randomized trials of asthma therapy guided by fraction of exhaled nitric oxide(FENO).

RESULTS

FENO has appeal as a marker to adjust asthma therapy since it is readily measured, gives reproducible results, and is responsive to changes in inhaled corticosteroid doses. However, the five randomised trials of FENO guided therapy have had mixed results. This may be because there are specific design and methodological issues that need to be addressed in the conduct of ASthma TReatment ALgorithm(ASTRAL) studies. There needs to be a clear dose response relationship for the active drugs used and the outcomes measured. The algorithm decision points should be based on outcomes in the population of interest rather than the range of values in healthy people, and the algorithm used needs to provide a sufficiently different result to clinical decision making in order for there to be any discernible benefit. A new metric is required to assess the algorithm performance, and the discordance:concordance(DC) ratio can assist with this.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating these design features into future FENO studies should improve the study performance and aid in obtaining a better estimate of the value of FENO guided asthma therapy.

Recurrent respiratory infections

The child who has recurrent infections poses one of the most difficult diagnostic challenges in pediatrics. The clinician faces a two-fold challenge in determining first whether the child is normal or has a serious disease, and then, in the latter case, how to confirm or exclude the diagnosis with the minimum number of the least invasive tests. It is hoped that, in the absence of good-quality evidence for most clinical scenarios, the experience-based approach described in this article may prove a useful guide to the clinician.

Daily telemonitoring of exhaled nitric oxide and symptoms in the treatment of childhood asthma

RATIONALE

Asthma treatment might improve when inhaled steroids are titrated on airway inflammation. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO0.05), a marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation, can be measured at home.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed daily FeNO0.05 telemonitoring in the management of childhood asthma.

METHODS

Children with atopic asthma (n = 151) were randomly assigned to two groups: FeNO0.05 plus symptom monitoring, or monitoring of symptoms only. All patients scored asthma symptoms in an electronic diary over 30 weeks; 77 received a portable nitric oxide (NO) analyzer. Data were transmitted daily to the coordinating centers. Patients were phoned every 3 weeks and their steroid dose was adapted according to FeNO0.05 and symptoms, or according to symptoms. Children were seen at 3, 12, 21, and 30 weeks for examination and lung function testing. The primary end point was the proportion of symptom-free days in the last 12 study weeks.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Telemonitoring was feasible with reliable FeNO0.05 data for 86% of days, and valid diary entries for 79% of days. Both groups showed an increase in symptom-free days, improvement of FEV1 and quality of life, and a reduction in steroid dose. None of the changes from baseline differed between groups. The difference in symptom-free days over the last 12 weeks was 0.3% (P = 0.95; 95% confidence interval, -10 to 11%). There was a trend for fewer exacerbations in the FeNO0.05 group.

CONCLUSIONS

Thirty weeks of daily FeNO0.05 and symptom telemonitoring was associated with improved asthma control and a lower steroid dose. We found no added value of daily FeNO0.05 monitoring compared with daily symptom monitoring only.

Variations in exhaled nitric oxide in children with asthma during a 1-week stay in a mountain village sanatorium

Knowing about spontaneous variations in the fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)) could improve monitoring of airway inflammation in asthmatic children. We aimed to assess FE(NO) variations (expiratory flow 50 mL/sec) in subjects maintained in similar environmental conditions. We tested spirometry and FE(NO) in symptom-free asthmatic children (9 corticosteroid-naive, 8 corticosteroid-treated) during a 1-week stay in a countryside sanatorium and in their healthy relatives (n = 12) staying in the immediate neighborhood on summer holiday (total 29 children, M/F:14/15, 5.8-16.8 yrs). Testing sessions were repeated every 12 hours (8:00 am, 8:00 pm) for 2 days and again on day 7. Measurements were defined as reproducible when they agreed with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) above 0.60; deviation from mean differences was assessed by the coefficient of repeatability (CR = 2 SD). Lung function remained constant throughout the week in all groups. Baseline FE(NO) levels in corticosteroid-naive asthmatic children tended to decrease at the end of the week (from 13.9 ppb, 95% CI 12.2-19.1 to 9.2 ppb, 95% CI 5.8-15.9, p = 0.057). No differences were found between nocturnal and diurnal FE(NO). Within-session reproducibility for two FE(NO) measurements was high (ICC 0.99 in all groups and CR, 0.9 to 1.3 ppb). Between-session FE(NO) reproducibility at 12 hours and 24 hours was still high for each group but decreased markedly after 6 days in corticosteroid-naive asthmatic children (ICC 0.79 and CR 9.6 ppb at 24 hours vs. ICC 0.13 and CR 20.8 ppb after 6 days), whereas it decreased slightly in corticosteroid-treated asthmatics (from ICC 0.89 and CR 3.1 ppb to ICC 0.88 and CR 3.0 ppb) and healthy children (from ICC 0.79 and CR 4.8 ppb to ICC 0.65 and CR 5.7 ppb). In conclusion, in healthy subjects and in asthmatic children receiving therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (but not in corticosteroid-naive subjects), FE(NO) measurements are reproducible across a week.

Predictors for failed dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids in childhood asthma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Studies of Western populations have shown that increased exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and/or sputum eosinophils (sp-Eos) are predictive of asthma exacerbations. However, the utility of these measurements in different populations and settings is unknown. This study aimed to determine the predictors for failure of reduction of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) doses in children with stable asthma.

METHODS

Fifty children (median age 11.8 years, interquartile range (IQR) 5.9 years) had their dose of ICS halved every 8 weeks until they reached the study end-point (exacerbation or weaned off ICS). Spirometry, FeNO and induced sputum cells were measured at baseline and at each stage of ICS reduction.

RESULTS

Eleven subjects suffered an asthma exacerbation and the remainder was successfully weaned off ICS. Subjects with an exacerbation were older (15.4 years (IQR 5.4) vs 11.4 years (IQR 3.9), P = 0.019) and more likely to be boys (P = 0.035). FeNO (median 156 p.p.b. (IQR 131) vs 76.1 p.p.b. (IQR 79.5), P = 0.013) and sp-Eos (17.3% (IQR 33.8%) vs 7.1% (IQR 9.9%), P = 0.019) were significantly greater in those who had an exacerbation. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for FeNO (0.78, 95% CI: 0.59-0.97, P = 0.013) and sp-Eos (0.76, 95% CI: 0.56-0.96, P = 0.016) were similar (P = 0.88) and both were significantly greater than that for FEV(1)% predicted (0.12, 95% CI: 0.08-0.56, P = 0.0013).

CONCLUSIONS

Older boys with raised FeNO and sp-Eos are at higher risk of failure of reduction in their ICS dose. Monitoring airway inflammation in children with asthma using FeNO or sp-Eos is clinically useful in guiding ICS dose reduction in a non-Western outpatient setting.

The value of FeNO measurement in asthma management: the motion for Yes, it's NO--or, the wrong end of the Stick!

The utility of measurements of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) will likely depend on context, being most helpful in moderate and severe asthma, rather than mild asthmatics and community based studies. Atopy on its own is a cause of elevation in FeNO. Adult and paediatric studies have clearly established that measurement of some aspect of airway inflammation is part of state of the art management of asthma, but it is as yet unclear which of several techniques is most useful. The relationship between FeNO and sputum eosinophils is relatively loose, but this does not preclude it being a useful test in clinical practice. In fact, there are only poor correlations between sputum, proximal mucosal, and distal eosinophils, and the importance of these different compartments is unclear. A low FeNO in the setting of supposedly poorly controlled asthma should cast doubt on the diagnosis. We certainly cannot treat an isolated elevation in FeNO, which may be due to a simple viral cold, or constitutional. If FeNO is elevated, particularly if asthma is uncontrolled, it suggests an imbalance between anti-inflammatory therapy and pro-inflammatory environmental influences. Inadequate anti-inflammatory therapy may be due to the prescribed dose being too low; the drug delivery device not being used correctly; or the medication not being taken. Adverse pro-inflammatory environmental influences driving up FeNO include IgE and non-IgE mediated allergen sensitivity in the home, and even in the child's school. Novel technology allows home monitoring of FeNO, but the role of these devices is less clear. Although more data is needed properly to define the role of FeNO measurements in clinical practice, there is sufficient data already published to conclude that 'inflammometry' is an important part of asthma management at the more severe end of the spectrum, and that FeNO measurements are probably the most useful at the moment.

Exhaled nitric oxide in the diagnosis and management of asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gaseous nitric oxide is present in our exhaled breath and may be a biomarker for asthma. The purpose of the present paper is to review recent studies that have explored the potential of exhaled nitric oxide as a biomarker for asthma diagnosis and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

The upper limit of exhaled nitric oxide has been described in several populations, using a standard methodology. Measurements of exhaled nitric oxide have good specificity but relatively poor sensitivity for diagnosing asthma. The inter- and intra-subject variability of exhaled nitric oxide values in asthmatics remains uncertain. Clinical trials have used exhaled nitric oxide to guide steroid treatment in asthmatics with varied success. The greatest success is in studies where inhaled corticosteroids are reduced and/or withdrawn in stable asthmatics. These pioneering clinical trials have given insight into how exhaled nitric oxide might be a useful index of control of eosinophilic airway inflammation.

SUMMARY

Measurements of exhaled nitric oxide have the potential to be useful in the management of allergic asthma and the answers to a number of important questions are awaited.

Stress effects on lung function in asthma are mediated by changes in airway inflammation

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association of changes in current negative mood and long-term daily hassles with changes in lung function and airway inflammation in patients suffering from asthma and in healthy controls. Associations between psychological factors and asthma symptoms have been documented, but the relationship between airway inflammation and psychological factors has been largely unexplored.

METHOD

Data were analyzed from 46 asthma patients and 25 controls who completed questionnaires on current mood and daily hassles at two assessments 3 months apart. Lung function was measured by spirometry (forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1))) and airway inflammation by the fraction of nitric oxide in exhaled air (FeNO). Regression analyses controlling for allergen load and air pollution (ozone) were calculated to study the association between changes in psychological factors and changes in lung function and airway inflammation, and to examine the mediational role of airway inflammation in the stress-lung function association.

RESULTS

In patients with asthma, increases in negative affect were associated with decreases in FEV(1) and increases in FeNO. For daily hassles, a reverse pattern of associations was found, with decreases in daily hassles linked to decreases in FEV(1) and increases in FeNO. Mediation analyses showed that FeNO was a significant mediator of the association of both negative affect and daily hassles with lung function changes. No significant associations were found for healthy controls.

CONCLUSION

Psychological variables are consistently associated with spirometric lung function and airway inflammation in asthma patients. For asthma patients, effects of acute negative affect must be distinguished from more chronic distress due to daily hassles.

Exhaled nitric oxide for monitoring childhood asthma inflammation compared to sputum analysis, serum interleukins and pulmonary function

The level of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is significantly elevated in uncontrolled asthma and decreases after anti-inflammatory therapy. The aim of this prospective study was to analyze the behavior of FENO in the follow-up and management of the inflammation in asthmatic pediatric patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), compared to sputum cellularity, serum interleukins (IL), and pulmonary function. Twenty-six clinically stable asthmatic children aged from 6 to 18 years, previously treated or not with ICS were included. Following an international consensus (GINA), the patients were submitted to standard treatment with inhaled fluticasone for 3 months according to the severity of the disease. During this period, each patient underwent three assessments at intervals of approximately 6 weeks. Each evaluation consisted of the measurement of FENO, determination of serum interleukins IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, and interferon gamma (INF-gamma), spirometry and cytological analysis of spontaneous or induced sputum. A significant reduction in mean FENO and IL-5, without concomitant changes in FEV1, was observed along the study. There was no significant correlation between FeNO and FEV1 in the three assessments. A significant correlation between FeNO and IL-5 levels was only observed in the third assessment (r = 0.499, P = 0.025). In most patients, serum IL-10, IL-13, and INF-gamma concentrations were undetectable throughout the study. Sputum samples were obtained spontaneously in 11 occasions and in 56 by induction with 3% hypertonic saline solution (success rate: 50.8%), with 39 (69.9%) of them adequate for analysis. Only two of the 26 patients produced adequate samples in the three consecutive evaluations, which impaired the determination of a potential association between sputum cellularity and FeNO levels throughout the study. In conclusion, among the parameters of this study, it was difficult to perform and to interpret the serial analysis of spontaneous or induced sputum. Serum interleukins, which remained at very low or undetectable levels in most patients, were not found to be useful for therapeutic monitoring, except for IL-5 that seems to present some correlation with levels of FeNO exhaled. Monitoring of the mean FEV1 indicated no significant variations during the treatment, demonstrating that functional stability or the absence of obstruction may not reflect the adequate management of asthma. Serial measurement of FeNO seemed to best reflect the progressive anti-inflammatory action of ICS in asthma.