Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: A facultative paraneoplastic dermatosis

Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) is a photosensitive dermatosis characterized by a nonscarring papulosquamous eruption and specific antibodies in the patient's serum. Genetic and environmental factors represent the leading causes of SCLE; however, several case reports in the literature link SCLE to various types of cancer. This review assesses the association between SCLE and neoplastic disorders. A PubMed search was performed for all relevant publications on cancer-associated SCLE from 1982 to 2022. This review supports the hypothesis that SCLE should be considered a facultative paraneoplastic phenomenon. It also emphasizes the importance of cancer screening in patients presenting SCLE manifestations.

Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus with a possible paraneoplastic association with melanoma

A 52-year-old man was referred to our dermatology clinic for a diagnosis of melanoma. At the time, his melanoma was excised he developed an annular, polycyclic, scaling eruption consistent with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE). Skin biopsy and laboratory evaluation confirmed this diagnosis. The patient had been using pantoprazole for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease for the last 3 years. The patient's melanoma was treated surgically, and his SCLE was treated with topical steroids and hydroxychloroquine. His SCLE cleared rapidly, his steroids and hydroxychloroquine were stopped and he remains free of SCLE off of treatment. The parallel course of the patient's SCLE and melanoma prompted consideration of SCLE as paraneoplastic to melanoma in this case. The clinical picture was complicated by the patient's use of a proton pump inhibitor, which are common causes of drug-induced SCLE. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of possible paraneoplastic SCLE associated with melanoma.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis-like subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus associated with lung carcinoma

Specific vesiculobullous skin lesions in lupus erythematosus (LE) are rare and must be differentiated from toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), TEN-like dermatoses and other vesiculobullous conditions. We report a patient with typical subacute cutaneous lupus erythematous that progressed with large sheet-like areas of epidermal detachment and Nikolsky sign resembling TEN. She had a serological profile suggestive of underlying connective tissue disease, histological findings of interface dermatitis with a lymphocytic infiltrate, positive direct immunofluorescence, resolution with immunomodulation and lack of a culprit drug, features observed in TEN-like cutaneous lupus erythematous. Furthermore, she was diagnosed with lung carcinoma, an association that has been previously reported. Differentiating a bullous eruption in the context of pre-existing LE remains difficult requiring a thorough analysis of clinical and histopathological data.

Trigger factors of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a review of current literature

It is currently believed that autoimmune conditions are triggered and aggravated by a variety of environmental factors such as cigarette smoking, infections, ultraviolet light or chemicals, as well as certain medications and vaccines in genetically susceptible individuals. Recent scientific data have suggested a relevant role of these factors not only in systemic lupus erythematosus, but also in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). A variety of environmental factors have been proposed as initiators and exacerbators of this disease. In this review we focused on those with the most convincing evidence, emphasizing the role of drugs in CLE. Using a combined search strategy of the MEDLINE and CINAHL databases the following trigger factors and/or exacerbators of CLE have been identified and described: drugs, smoking, neoplasms, ultraviolet radiation and radiotherapy. In order to give a practical insight we emphasized the role of drugs from various groups and classes in CLE. We also aimed to present a short clinical profile of patients with lesions induced by various drug classes.

Autoimmune paraneoplastic syndromes associated to lung cancer: A systematic review of the literature: Part 2: Hematologic, cutaneous and vascular syndromes

The development of new immune treatment in oncology and particularly for lung cancer may induce new complications, particularly activation or reactivation of auto-immune diseases. In this context, a systematic review on the auto-immune paraneoplastic syndromes associated with lung cancer appears useful. This article is the second of a series of five and deals with hematologic, cutaneous and vascular syndromes.

Photoaggravated disorders

Photoaggravated skin disorders are diseases that occur without UV radiation but are sometimes or frequently exacerbated by UV radiation. In conditions, such as lupus erythematosus, photoaggravation occurs in a majority of patients, whereas in conditions, such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, only a subset of patients demonstrate photoaggravation. Polymorphous light eruption is a common photodermatosis in all skin types, making it important to differentiate photoaggravation of an underlying disorder, such as lupus erythematosus, from superimposed polymorphous light eruption. Disease-specific treatments should be instituted where possible. A key component of management of photoaggravated conditions is photoprotection with behavioral change, UV-protective clothing, and broad-spectrum sunscreen.

Acute blistering diseases on the burn ward: Beyond Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

OBJECTIVE

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis are on a spectrum of rare reactions primarily attributable to drugs. Timely diagnosis, cessation of the offending drug and burn center care are associated with favorable outcomes. Acute blistering disease has a wide differential diagnosis, including autoimmune bullous disease and other drug reactions. The aim of our study was to identify the final diagnosis in patients transferred for widespread blistering disease and to identify clinical features at admission predicting final diagnosis.

METHODS

We performed a 5-year retrospective chart review (2006-2011) of the clinical features at admission of patients transferred to a burn ward with widespread blistering disease. Clinical features at admission were compared between patients.

RESULTS

12 patients had a final diagnosis of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome or Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and 7 patients had an alternative final diagnosis. Skin detachment surface area at admission was superior in the Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis group. Presence of tense bullae and pustules was associated with an alternative final diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Extensive skin detachment surface and morphological features (tense bullae, pustules) were statistically significant clinical clues to final diagnosis. Patients transferred for widespread blistering disease should be thoroughly evaluated in order to exclude other causes of acute blistering disease.

Drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: evidence for differences from its idiopathic counterpart

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (DI-SCLE) is a lupus variant with predominant skin involvement temporally related to drug exposure and resolving after drug discontinuation. It usually presents with annular polycyclic or papulosquamous eruptions on sun-exposed skin and shows serum anti-Ro/SSA antibodies.

OBJECTIVES

To address the question whether DI-SCLE differs significantly from idiopathic SCLE by virtue of clinical features.

METHODS

Ninety patients with SCLE seen in our departments from 2001 to 2010 were reviewed. Eleven of them diagnosed as having DI-SCLE were evaluated for type of skin lesions, systemic involvement, clinical course, and histopathological, direct immunofluorescence and laboratory findings. The cutaneous features were compared with those of the 79 patients with idiopathic SCLE.

RESULTS

The cutaneous picture was widespread in 82% of patients with DI-SCLE and in 6% of those with idiopathic SCLE [odds ratio (OR) 66·6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 11·2-394·9; P = 0·0001]. Bullous and erythema multiforme (EM)-like lesions were present in 45% of patients with DI-SCLE and in 1% of those with idiopathic SCLE (OR 65·0, 95% CI 6·5-649·6; P = 0·0001). Vasculitic lesions were observed in 45% of patients with DI-SCLE and in 3% of those with idiopathic SCLE (OR 32·1, 95% CI 5·1-201·7; P = 0·0001). Malar rash occurred in 45% of patients with DI-SCLE and in 6% of those with idiopathic SCLE (OR 12·3, 95% CI 2·8-54·9; P = 0·001). Visceral manifestations were excluded in all patients with DI-SCLE. Anti-Ro/SSA antibodies were found in all but one patient with DI-SCLE and disappeared after resolution in 73% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

DI-SCLE differs from idiopathic SCLE by virtue of distinctive cutaneous features, particularly the widespread presentation and the frequent occurrence of malar rash and bullous, EM-like and vasculitic manifestations.