Failure of high-dose sustained release luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist (buserelin) plus oral testosterone to suppress male fertility

Update on male hormonal contraception

Despite increases in female contraceptive options, 40-45% of pregnancies across the world are still unplanned. While several effective female contraceptive methods have been developed, contraceptive choices for men are still limited to the male condom with its high failure rates and to vasectomies, which are invasive and not reliably reversible. Several studies have demonstrated a great interest among men and women for effective, reversible, and safe male contraceptive methods. Over the years, numerous studies have been performed to develop male hormonal and nonhormonal safe and effective contraceptives. A variety of new molecules are under development as oral or transdermal hormonal contraceptives for men demonstrating few side effects. In our overpopulated world, the development and commercialization of a male contraceptive method that will allow both men and women to take an active role in family planning is mandatory and further research on this topic is required.

Male hormonal contraception: hope and promise

Family planning is a shared responsibility, but available male-directed contraceptive methods are either not easily reversible (vasectomy) or not sufficiently effective (condom). However, roughly 20% of couples using a contraceptive method worldwide, and up to 80% in some countries, still choose a male-directed method. Male hormonal contraception is highly effective, with perfect use failure rates of 0·6% (95% CI 0·3-1·1) if sperm concentrations of less than 1 million per mL are maintained. After cessation of male hormonal contraception, sperm output fully recovers in a predictable manner, resulting in pregnancies and livebirths. Spontaneous miscarriage and fetal malformation rates after recovery of sperm output overlap those in the general population. Short-term adverse events-acne, night sweats, increased weight, and altered mood and libido-are recognised, but are generally mild. Further optimisation of specific androgen-progestin regimens and phase 3 studies of lead combinations are still needed to successfully develop an approved male hormonal contraceptive and to identify long-term side-effects.

Recent methodological advances in male hormonal contraception

Landmark WHO-sponsored trials showed decades ago that male hormonal contraception (MHC) is an effective male-directed contraceptive approach. Considerable progress has been made particularly in the last 5 years, establishing for the first time the reversibility of MHC and its short-term safety. Methodological advances in recent years include the pooling of information and individual-level integrated analysis; the first-time use of centralized semen analysis and fluorescence to detect low sperm concentrations; the establishment of sperm quality reference ranges in fertile men; the measurement of blood steroid concentrations by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; and the inclusion of placebo groups to delineate clearly possible adverse effects of androgens and progestins in men. We report integrated analyses of factors that are important in predicting suppression and recovery of spermatogenesis after MHC clinical trials for the past 15 years. These are the best data available and will provide guidance and reassurance for the larger-scale Phase III specific regimen efficacy studies that will be required to bring MHC to the population (market).

Determinants of the rate and extent of spermatogenic suppression during hormonal male contraception: an integrated analysis

CONTEXT

Male hormonal contraceptive methods require effective suppression of sperm output.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to define the covariables that influence the rate and extent of suppression of spermatogenesis to a level shown in previous World Health Organization-sponsored studies to be sufficient for contraceptive purposes (< or =1 million/ml).

DESIGN

This was an integrated analysis of all published male hormonal contraceptive studies of at least 3 months' treatment duration.

SETTING

Deidentified individual subject data were provided by investigators of 30 studies published between 1990 and 2006.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1756 healthy men (by physical, blood, and semen exam) aged 18-51 yr of predominantly Caucasian (two thirds) or Asian (one third) descent were studied. This represents about 85% of all the published data.

INTERVENTION(S)

Men were treated with different preparations of testosterone, with or without various progestins.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Semen analysis was the main measure.

RESULTS

Progestin coadministration increased both the rate and extent of suppression. Caucasian men suppressed sperm output faster initially but ultimately to a less complete extent than did non-Caucasians. Younger age and lower initial blood testosterone or sperm concentration were also associated with faster suppression, but the independent effect sizes for age and baseline testicular function were relatively small.

CONCLUSION

Male hormonal contraceptives can be practically applied to a wide range of men but require coadministration of an androgen with a second agent (i.e. progestin) for earlier and more complete suppression of sperm output. Whereas considerable progress has been made toward defining clinically effective combinations, further optimization of androgen-progestin treatment regimens is still required.

Rates of suppression and recovery of human sperm output in testosterone-based hormonal contraceptive regimens*

BACKGROUND

Practical hormonal male contraceptive regimens are likely to have delayed onset and offset of reliable contraception dictated by the length of the spermatogenic cycle and clearance rate of pre-formed sperm from the ductular system. While delayed onset of contraceptive efficacy is an accepted feature of vasectomy, reliable time estimates for a hormonal male contraceptive of time to onset and offset of reliable contraception and of resumption of normal male fertility are required.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We utilized the sperm output data from three male contraceptive efficacy studies to define quantitative estimates of suppression and recovery rates from an androgen alone (testosterone enanthate) and an androgen/progestin (testosterone/depot medroxyprogesterone acetate) study. Using nearly 14,000 semen samples from World Health Organization (WHO) studies #85921 and #89903 with identical protocols, the rate of suppression of sperm output was best modelled as a two-parameter, single exponential decay function with effective half-time to suppression of 5.5 weeks and times of 6.8 weeks to 10 x 10(6)/ml, 8.7 weeks to 5 x 10(6)/ml, 10.0 weeks to 3 x 10(6)/ml and 13.0 weeks to 1 x 10(6)/ml. The rate of recovery using absolute sperm concentration was best modelled as a three-parameter, sigmoidal curve with effective time to reach half of the recovery plateau of 10.5 weeks and times of 9.0 weeks to 3 x 10(6)/ml, 9.9 weeks to 5 x 10(6)/ml, 11.5 weeks to 10 x 10(6)/ml, and 13.6 weeks to 20 x 10(6)/ml. Using relative sperm output, defined as a percentage of the participants' own baseline, recovery approached an asymptotic plateau of approximately 85% of geometric mean pre-treatment sperm concentration. In the combination androgen/progestin study, suppression rate was significantly faster (effective time to reach half maximal suppression of 3.0 weeks) and recovery significantly slower (effective time to reach half of recovery plateau of 14.7 weeks) and less complete (asymptotic recovery plateau of 43% of baseline) than in the androgen-alone WHO studies.

CONCLUSION

These findings therefore provide large sample estimates of the suppression and recovery rates from an androgen-alone hormonal male contraceptive regimen as a basis for comparison with other second-generation combination androgen/progestin regimens that are the most promising approach to developing practical male hormonal regimens.

An oral regimen of cyproterone acetate and testosterone undecanoate for spermatogenic suppression in men

OBJECTIVE

To test the effectiveness, safety, and reversibility of the combined administration of cyproterone acetate and T undecanoate.

DESIGN

Open clinical trial.

SETTING

Healthy volunteers in an academic research environment.

PATIENT(S)

Eight healthy men, aged 25-42 years were selected.

INTERVENTION(S)

Cyproterone acetate, 12.5 mg, and T undecanoate, 80 mg, were administered orally twice daily for 16 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Semen analyses every 2 weeks; physical examination, chemistries, hematology, prostatic-specific antigen, gonadotropins and T levels, and a questionnaire on sexual and behavioral function every 4 weeks.

RESULT(S)

In all subjects a profound suppression of spermatogenesis occurred; one subject became azoospermic, five subjects had sperm counts of < or = 3 x 10(6)/mL, and in two subjects sperm counts were 4 and 6 x 10(6)/mL in week 16. Sperm counts returned to baseline in all men after hormone administration was discontinued. No changes in metabolic parameters and total prostatic-specific antigen were detected. Hemoglobin and hematocrit decreased statistically significantly at week 16 of treatment and returned to baseline by week 12 of recovery. There was no change in sexual function or behavior.

CONCLUSION(S)

The oral administration of T undecanoate plus cyproterone acetate induces a profound suppression of spermatogenesis with no major adverse effects. These data suggest the feasibility of oral contraception in men.

Developments in the control of testicular function

Clinicians and clinical investigators have developed improved means for controlling testicular function in men. New and refined approaches for stimulation and inhibition of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis are now available. This chapter reviewed the most successful ways to inhibit the reproductive axis in men and its current application to the treatment of precocious puberty, metastatic prostate cancer, benign prostate hyperplasia and as prospective male contraceptives. Safe, effective and reversible medical approaches to male contraception are now approaching reality. Azoospermia and severe oligozoo/azoospermia can now be accomplished in the majority of men with combined GnRH antagonists and replacement doses of testosterone. Androgens and androgen-progestogen concentrations will induce azoospermia in over 90% of Asian men and azoospermia or severe oligospermia in Caucasian ethnic groups. Field trials are ongoing to determine whether testosterone administration will be more effective than condoms as contraceptives. True precocious puberty can now be managed more effectively than in the past by suppression of gonadotropin secretion with GnRH analogues. Precocious puberty due to other causes can be treated more effectively with inhibitors of steroidogenesis and blockers of androgen action. Metastatic prostate cancer, previously treatable with either castration or oestrogens, is now amenable to suppression of androgen secretion. GnRH analogues are given either alone or combined with blockers of androgen action. While significant palliative effects are observed with endocrine ablative therapy in most men with Stage C or D prostate cancer, modest increases in duration of survival may be seen. Benign prostate hyperplasia was previously approachable only with surgical intervention. Recent data have suggested that medical treatment with 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors and/or selective alpha-adrenergic blockers may offer non-surgical alternatives in some patients. More data are needed to determine the role of medical management of this common disorder.

Buserelin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and clinical profile

The gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) [luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH); gonadorelin] agonist buserelin is a promising new agent in the treatment of a variety of disorders in gynaecology and andrology, paediatrics and oncology. While a single dose of buserelin stimulates the release of pituitary gonadotrophins, multiple doses produce reversible pituitary desensitisation, and this specific blockade of gonadotrophin support to the gonads provides the basis for the drug's efficacy in conditions dependent on sex hormone secretion. Thus, buserelin provides comparable efficacy to orchidectomy or high dose estrogens in the treatment of hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and exhibits a lower incidence of adverse effects. During the early phase of treatment it may be particularly useful in combination with antiandrogens. Buserelin also appears promising in hormone-sensitive premenopausal breast cancer. Extensive studies have proven the value of buserelin in endometriosis, where it produces a transient remission with gradual recurrence of the disease on cessation of treatment. Surgical intervention is necessary in severe disease after buserelin-induced involution of the lesions. In patients with uterine leiomyoma, preliminary data suggest that buserelin may be beneficial in rendering surgery more conservative by reducing fibroid size, although it appears unlikely to preclude surgical intervention. The use of buserelin to induce a state of reversible hypogonadotrophism before administration of exogenous gonadotrophins is a promising strategy in the treatment of infertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome and other conditions of infertility with underlying ovarian dysfunction; such a strategy also clearly enhances the efficiency of in vitro fertilisation programmes. Initial studies suggest its potential usefulness as a female contraceptive when administered intermittently in conjunction with a progestogen. Buserelin represents a first-line treatment of central precocious puberty. In endometriosis the adverse effect profile of buserelin is generally favourable, with hypoestrogenic effects such as hot flushes and vaginal dryness, and decreased libido, predominating. There is no apparent detrimental effect on lipid metabolism. The potential for adverse hypoestrogenic effects on bone mineral content with long term administration remains to be clarified. Thus, the GnRH agonist buserelin represents an advance in the treatment of a variety of gynaecological and andrological as well as paediatric and oncological conditions, infertility and other sex-hormone dependent conditions, with a low incidence of adverse treatment effects.

Objective measurement of testicular volume by ultrasonography: evaluation of the technique and comparison with orchidometer estimates

Ultrasonography of the scrotum is a valid and safe method for differentiating testicular and extratesticular disease. In the present study the accuracy and reproducibility of ultrasonographic estimation of testicular volume was evaluated. A high correlation (r = 0.992) between actual testicular volume (measured by weighing and water displacement) and the volume determined by ultrasonography was found on examination of 14 tests from patients at autopsy without any systematic under- or over-estimation. The ultrasound method proved to be highly reproducible with a coefficient of variation of 7.0 +/- 0.7%. Using different ultrasound scanners did not significantly influence the results obtained. The comparison of Prader orchidometer measurements, performed by four different clinical investigators, and ultrasonography in 256 patients revealed a significant correlation of 0.91, but the degree of correlation was dependent on the investigator's clinical experience. Volume estimates by comparative palpation appear to be valuable in most clinical settings. Ultrasonography provides an excellent tool for determining testicular volume when objective, accurate and reproducible measurements of testicular volume are required.

Suppression of sperm function by depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and testosterone enanthate in steroid male contraception

Ten normal men were given three monthly intramuscular injections of 200 mg of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and 250 mg of testosterone (T) enanthate. Six men became azoospermic, while four remained oligozoospermic, with a mean sperm density of 1.5 +/- 0.3 standard error of the mean million/ml. Zona-free hamster oocyte penetration was abolished in all oligozoospermic samples at the end of treatment. Twenty of the 21 oligozoospermic samples yielding at least 0.6 to 5.0 million motile spermatozoa showed a complete absence of oocyte penetration. Semen parameters returned to normal, although some took up to 12 months. These findings demonstrated an antifertility action of MPA and T enanthate on the functional capacity of residual spermatozoa and support the view that extreme oligozoospermia may be a tenable target for reversible steroid male contraception.

Effects of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist analog (ICI 118630) on endocrine functions of human testis in vivo and in vitro

Six prostatic cancer patients were treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist analog (ICI 118630, ICI Pharmaceutical Division, Macclesfield, England) for 4 weeks, and serum testosterone (T) had fallen to the castration level in all patients. Subsequently, three of the patients were orchiectomized. There were no significant differences in follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) receptors between the testes treated with ICI 118630 and testes obtained from untreated prostatic cancer patients. In the other three patients, testicular responsiveness evaluated using hCG stimulation was similar before and after 4 weeks of treatment. In vitro studies testes removed from untreated prostatic cancer patients were cultured in a medium with or without ICI 118630 for 5 days. There were no significant differences in FSH and hCG receptors and T production between the two groups. In conclusion, ICI 118630 had no direct inhibitory effect on human testes.

Clinical applications of LHRH analogues

What is the current state of clinical application of inhibition of gonadal activity with LHRH agonists or antagonists? It seems unlikely in the short term that antagonists will be widely applied due to the short-acting nature of the present compounds and their troublesome side-effects. In contrast clinical studies with a number of agonists have demonstrated their efficacy in producing a hypogonadal state safely with rapid recovery following cessation of therapy. Although nasal administration may be suitable for short-term suppression (up to 28 days) it seems likely that long-acting depot preparations will be useful for more prolonged suppression. Perhaps the easiest application to determine will be the profound suppression required to produce medical castration in hormone-dependent tumours. The combination of agonist and receptor blocker is attractive particularly when the receptor blocker like cyproterone acetate also suppresses the release of LH, FSH and adrenocorticotrophic hormone. In cancer of the prostate and breast the side-effects due to inhibition of secretion of testosterone and oestradiol are tolerable although the only benefit over castration is the avoidance of minor surgery. The agonists should improve significantly the existing treatment for precocious puberty, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCO) and induction of ovulation although large scale trials comparing different therapies and doses are required. Finally, the concept of combination therapies to block further the influence of steroid hormones suggests challenging possibilities for even more effective therapy.

Endocrine approaches to male fertility control

As in the female, gametogenesis in the male is under the control of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). Their suppression should inhibit spermatogenesis. If a non-androgenic substance is used to suppress gonadotrophins, androgens must be supplemented to maintain virility, potency and metabolic processes. To avoid administration of several substances, testosterone and its esters were used to develop a male antifertility agent. Although azoospermia can be induced in a high proportion of men with administration of testosterone esters alone, this effect is not uniform. Even frequent injections with testosterone enanthate at weekly intervals fail to inhibit spermatogenesis in all participants. Combinations of gestagenic compounds with testosterone esters show a somewhat better effect, but again azoospermia is only achieved in around 50% of participants. LHRH analogues, although considered by many to offer a realistic potential for male fertility regulation, have not been proven to be successful for this purpose so far. Animal studies in monkeys and preliminary clinical trials demonstrate that agonistic analogues of LHRH have to be given continuously by pump or implant to achieve a pronounced effect on spermatogenesis. But even under these provisions, results in clinical trials have been worse than effects achieved with testosterone/gestagen combinations. Whether new antagonistic compounds offer a better potential awaits clinical trials. Studies in non-human primates demonstrate that testosterone by itself can maintain and initiate spermatogenesis. Based on these findings one could postulate an attenuating effect of high serum androgen levels after supplementation with available testosterone esters. Trials of alternative androgenic substances with slow-release characteristics and without high serum levels after single injections, like 19-nortestosterone hexyloxyphenylpropionate (19NT-HPP), tend to support this theory. With slow-release testosterone preparations under development by the WHO and more advanced delivery systems for LHRH analogues it is not unreasonable to speculate that an effective endocrine antifertility agent for the male will become available.