Efficacy of lanreotide Autogel administered every 4-8 weeks in patients with acromegaly previously responsive to lanreotide microparticles 30 mg: a phase III trial

A systematic literature review to evaluate extended dosing intervals in the pharmacological management of acromegaly

PURPOSE

This systematic literature review investigated whether extended dosing intervals (EDIs) of pharmacological acromegaly treatments reduce patient burden and costs compared with standard dosing, while maintaining effectiveness.

METHODS

MEDLINE/Embase/the Cochrane Library (2001-June 2021) and key congresses (2018-2021) were searched and identified systematic literature review bibliographies reviewed. Included publications reported on efficacy/effectiveness, safety and tolerability, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient-reported and economic outcomes in longitudinal/cross-sectional studies in adults with acromegaly. Interventions included EDIs of pegvisomant, cabergoline, and somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs): lanreotide autogel/depot (LAN), octreotide long-acting release (OCT), pasireotide long-acting release (PAS), and oral octreotide; no comparator was required.

RESULTS

In total, 35 publications reported on 27 studies: 3 pegvisomant monotherapy, 11 pegvisomant combination therapy with SRLs, 9 LAN, and 4 OCT; no studies reported on cabergoline, PAS, or oral octreotide at EDIs. Maintenance of normal insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) was observed in ≥ 70% of patients with LAN (1 study), OCT (1 study), and pegvisomant monotherapy (1 study). Achievement of normal IGF-I was observed in ≥ 70% of patients with LAN (3 studies) and pegvisomant in combination with SRLs (4 studies). Safety profiles were similar across EDI and standard regimens. Patients preferred and were satisfied with EDIs. HRQoL was maintained and cost savings were provided with EDIs versus standard regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical efficacy/effectiveness, safety, and HRQoL outcomes in adults with acromegaly were similar and costs lower with EDIs versus standard regimens. Physicians may consider acromegaly treatment at EDIs, especially for patients with good disease control.

Effectiveness of lanreotide autogel 120 mg at extended dosing intervals for acromegaly

PURPOSE

Recent data indicate that extended dosing intervals (EDIs) with lanreotide autogel 120 mg are effective and well-received among patients with acromegaly who have achieved biochemical control with monthly injections of long-acting somatostatin analogues (SSAs). We further evaluated the effectiveness of lanreotide autogel 120 mg delivered at EDIs (>4 weeks) in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Cross-sectional, multicentre, observational study conducted to determine the effectiveness-measured by control of serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1)-of lanreotide autogel 120 mg at dosing intervals >4 weeks for ≥6 months in selected patients with acromegaly treated in routine clinical practice (NCT02807233). Secondary assessments included control of growth hormone (GH) levels, treatment adherence, patient satisfaction, and quality of life (QoL) using validated questionnaires (EQ-5D, AcroQoL, and TSQM-9). Patients who received radiotherapy within the last 6 months were excluded.

RESULTS

Among 109 patients evaluated, mean (SD) age was 59.1 (13.2) years. IGF-1 values were normal (mean [SD]: 175.0 [74.5], 95% CI: 160.8 -189.1) in 91.7% of cases and normal in 91.4% of patients without previous radiotherapy treatment (n = 81). GH levels were ≤2.5 and ≤1 ng/mL, respectively, in 80.6% and 58.3%. Most patients were treated either every 5-6 (57.8%) or 7-8 weeks (38.5%), with 2.8% treated greater than every 8 weeks. The mean AcroQoL score was 63.0 (20.1). The mean global treatment satisfaction score (TSQM-9) was 75.1 (16.6). Treatment adherence (defined as no missed injections) was 94.5%.

CONCLUSION

Lanreotide autogel 120 mg at intervals of >4 weeks provided IGF-1 control in more than 90% of patients with acromegaly. Treatment satisfaction and adherence were good. These findings support use of extended dosing intervals in patients who have achieved good biochemical control with long-acting SSAs.

ACROSTART: A retrospective study of the time to achieve hormonal control with lanreotide Autogel treatment in Spanish patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVES

The ACROSTART study was intended to determine the time to achieve normalization of GH and IGF-I levels in responding patients with acromegaly administered different dosage regimens of lanreotide Autogel (Somatuline^® Autogel^®).

METHODS

From March 2013 to October 2013, clinical data from 57 patients from 17 Spanish hospitals with active acromegaly treated with lanreotide for ≥4 months who achieved hormonal control (GH levels <2.5ng/ml and/or normalized IGF-I levels in ≥2 measurements) were analyzed. The primary objective was to determine the time from start of lanreotide treatment to hormonal normalization.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 64 years, 21 patients were male, 39 patients had undergone surgery, and 14 patients had received radiotherapy. Median hormonal values at start of lanreotide treatment were: GH, 2.6ng/ml; IGF-I, 1.6×ULN. The most common starting dose of lanreotide was 120mg (29 patients). The main initial regimens were 60mg/4 weeks (n=13), 90mg/4 weeks (n=6), 120mg/4 weeks (n=13), 120mg/6 weeks (n=6), and 120mg/8 weeks (n=9). An initial treatment regimen with a long interval (≥6 weeks) was administered in 25 patients. Mean duration of lanreotide treatment was 68 months (7-205). Median time to achieve hormonal control was 4.9 months. Injections were managed without healthcare assistance in 13 patients. Median number of visits to endocrinologists until hormonal control was achieved was 3. Fifty-one patients were "satisfied"/"very satisfied" with treatment and 49 patients did not miss any dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-life treatment with lanreotide Autogel resulted in early hormonal control in responding patients, with high treatment adherence and satisfaction despite disparity in starting doses and dosing intervals.

Somatostatin analogs, cabergoline and pegvisomant: comparing the efficacy of medical treatment for acromegaly

Therapies for acromegaly aim at normalizing hormonal excess and controlling tumor growth . Therapeutic approaches are surgery, pharmacotherapy and radiotherapy. Area covered: This review focuses on the role of medical therapy of acromegaly, comparing the efficacy of somatostatin analogues (SSA), dopamine-agonists (DA) and pegvisomant (PEG), the three available drug classes for treating acromegaly. To clarify the difference in response rates reported in the literature for these therapies, we performed a search for original articles published in PubMed. SSA represent the first-line approach to medical treatment. This therapy is effective in controlling acromegaly in about 40% of patients, however there are great differences in the reported hormonal efficacy of SSA in the different series. In patients partially resistant to SSA, cabergoline can be added when hormonal levels are close to normalization, resulting effective in control IGF-I levels in 43% of patients. In patients with higher hormonal levels PEG is indicated, normalizing IGF-I levels in 79.8% and 80.6% of cases when used in monotherapy or in combination with SSA. Pasireotide, the newly developed SSA multi-ligand receptor, represents a new option in SSA resistant patients. Expert commentary: Medical therapy represents an important therapeutic option resulting safe and effective in controlling acromegaly in a high percentage of patients. The best treatment should be individually tailored for each patient, taking into account sex, age, comorbidities, tumor characteristics and hormonal levels.

Octreotide and Lanreotide in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors are heterogeneous, rare malignancies that arise most commonly in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. They often secrete vasoactive substances resulting in carcinoid syndrome and the tumor cells exclusively express somatostatin receptors. Octreotide and lanreotide are the two synthetic somatostatin analogs used for the control of carcinoid symptoms and tumor progression in advanced inoperable disease. Recent pivotal trials (PROMID and CLARINET studies) established their antitumor activity. We discuss the available data to support their use as symptom controlling and antiproliferative agents. This article also reviews the guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network and North American Neuro Endocrine Tumor Society), cost-analysis (suggesting the cost-effectiveness of lanreotide autogel compared to higher doses of octreotide long acting release formulation in refractory patients), and future directions of somatostatin analogs in the management of patients refractory to conventional doses of octreotide and lanreotide.

Interpreting biochemical control response rates with first-generation somatostatin analogues in acromegaly

CONTEXT

The somatostatin analogues octreotide LAR and lanreotide Autogel have been evaluated for the treatment of acromegaly in numerous clinical trials, with considerable heterogeneity in reported biochemical response rates. This review examines and attempts to account for these differences in response rates reported in the literature.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed was searched for English-language studies of a minimum duration of 24 weeks that evaluated ≥10 patients with acromegaly treated with octreotide LAR or lanreotide Autogel from 1990 to March 2015 and reported GH and/or IGF-1 data as the primary objective of the study.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Of the 190 clinical trials found, 18 octreotide LAR and 15 lanreotide Autogel studies fulfilled the criteria for analysis. It is evident from the protocols of these studies that multiple factors are capable of impacting on reported response rates. Prospective studies reporting an intention-to-treat analysis that evaluated medically naïve patients and used the composite endpoint of both GH and IGF-1 control were associated with lower response rates. The use of non-composite biochemical control endpoints, heterogeneous patient populations, analyses that exclude treatment non-responders, assay variability and prior responsiveness to medical therapy are just a few of the factors identified that likely contribute to higher success rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The wide range of reported response rates with somatostatin analogues may be confusing and could lead to misinterpretation by both the patient and the physician in certain situations. Understanding the factors that potentially drive the variation in response rates should allow clinicians to better gauge treatment expectations in specific patients.

Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg at extended dosing intervals in patients with acromegaly biochemically controlled with octreotide LAR: the LEAD study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate extended dosing intervals (EDIs) with lanreotide Autogel 120 mg in patients with acromegaly previously biochemically controlled with octreotide LAR 10 or 20 mg.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients with acromegaly had received octreotide LAR 10 or 20 mg/4 weeks for ≥ 6 months and had normal IGF1 levels. Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg was administered every 6 weeks for 24 weeks (phase 1); depending on week-24 IGF1 levels, treatment was then administered every 4, 6 or 8 weeks for a further 24 weeks (phase 2). Hormone levels, patient-reported outcomes and adverse events were assessed.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

proportion of patients on 6- or 8-week EDIs with normal IGF1 levels at week 48 (study end).

RESULTS

107/124 patients completed the study (15 withdrew from phase 1 and two from phase 2). Of 124 patients enrolled, 77.4% were allocated to 6- or 8-week EDIs in phase 2 and 75.8% (95% CI: 68.3-83.3) had normal IGF1 levels at week 48 with the EDI (primary analysis). A total of 88.7% (83.1-94.3) had normal IGF1 levels after 24 weeks with 6-weekly dosing. GH levels were ≤ 2.5 μg/l in > 90% of patients after 24 and 48 weeks. Patient preferences for lanreotide Autogel 120 mg every 4, 6 or 8 weeks over octreotide LAR every 4 weeks were high.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with acromegaly achieving biochemical control with octreotide LAR 10 or 20 mg/4 weeks are possible candidates for lanreotide Autogel 120 mg EDIs. EDIs are effective and well received among such patients.

Clinical applications of somatostatin analogs for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas

Excessive growth hormone (GH) is usually secreted by GH-secreting pituitary adenomas and causes gigantism in juveniles or acromegaly in adults. The clinical complications involving cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic systems lead to elevated morbidity in acromegaly. Control of serum GH and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) 1 hypersecretion by surgery or pharmacotherapy can decrease morbidity. Current pharmacotherapy includes somatostatin analogs (SAs) and GH receptor antagonist; the former consists of lanreotide Autogel (ATG) and octreotide long-acting release (LAR), and the latter refers to pegvisomant. As primary medical therapy, lanreotide ATG and octreotide LAR can be supplied in a long-lasting formulation to achieve biochemical control of GH and IGF-1 by subcutaneous injection every 4-6 weeks. Lanreotide ATG and octreotide LAR provide an effective medical treatment, whether as a primary or secondary therapy, for the treatment of GH-secreting pituitary adenoma; however, to maximize benefits with the least cost, several points should be emphasized before the application of SAs. A comprehensive assessment, especially of the observation of clinical predictors and preselection of SA treatment, should be completed in advance. A treatment process lasting at least 3 months should be implemented to achieve a long-term stable blood concentration. More satisfactory surgical outcomes for noninvasive macroadenomas treated with presurgical SA may be achieved, although controversy of such adjuvant therapy exists. Combination of SA and pegvisomant or cabergoline shows advantages in some specific cases. Thus, an individual treatment program should be established for each patient under a full evaluation of the risks and benefits.

Pharmacoeconomic aspects of the treatment of pituitary gland tumours

Nowadays physicians are under economic pressure; therefore therapeutic decisions based on safety, efficacy, and the effectiveness of the medication also require economic analysis. The aim of this review is to discuss data concerning the cost-effectiveness of drug therapy in patients with hormonally active pituitary adenomas, namely growth hormone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas, prolactinoma and pituitary incidentaloma. In acromegalic patients using lanreotide is cheaper for health care payers and more convenient for physicians and patients because of the opportunity for self/partner injections, lower clogging risk and possibility of longer intervals between injections, while the efficacy is comparable with octreotide. Patients with prolactinomas should be treated with novel dopamine agonists, such as cabergoline or quinagolide, however, bromocriptine still remains a cheaper and almost as effective alternative. There are no easy methods or algorithms, but in general, extracting the maximum value from the investment in treatment is essential.

The place of medical treatment of acromegaly: current status and perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is characterized by elevated growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels and by progressive somatic disfigurement and systemic manifestations, which lead to a mortality rate higher than the general population. Therefore, diagnosis and properly treatment should be performed as soon as possible.

AREAS COVERED

This article focuses on the state of the art of acromegaly medical treatment. Somatostatin analogs, dopamine agonists and GH receptor antagonist were reviewed. Somatostatin analogs, the first-choice pharmacotherapy, can be used as primary or pre-operative treatment or as secondary therapy after failed surgery. Dopamine agonists have been used in patients with slightly elevated hormone levels and/or mixed GH/prolactin adenomas. Pegvisomant is indicated for resistant to somatostatin analogs/dopamine agonists. Combined treatment is also an option for resistant cases. Other non-conventional therapies and perspectives of treatment were also been discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The control of disease activity in acromegaly is of paramount importance. Medical treatment is an important option for cases in which surgery was unsuccessful or not indicated. Despite the achievements in medical treatment, somatotropic tumor aggressiveness and/or resistance to the drugs currently available remain a concern. Therefore, novel therapy targets based on molecular pathogenesis of GH-secreting tumors are currently in development, aiming at fulfilling this important gap.

Changes in acromegaly treatment over four decades in Spain: analysis of the Spanish Acromegaly Registry (REA)

Since 1997 there is an online National Registry of acromegalic patients in Spain (REA). We aimed to study changes in acromegaly treatment and outcomes over the last four decades in Spain. In REA clinical and biochemical data are collected at diagnosis and updated every one to 2 years. We analyzed the first treatment received and the different treatments administered according to decade of diagnosis of acromegaly: prior to 1980, 1980-1989, 1990-1999 and 2000-2009. Surgical cure rates according to pretreatment with long-acting somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) were also analyzed. 1,658 patients were included of which 698 had accurate follow-up data. Treatment of acromegaly changed over time. Surgery was the main treatment option (83.8 %) and medical treatment was widely used (74.7 %) both maintained over decades, while radiation therapy declined (62.8, 61.6, 42.2 and 11.9 % over decades, p < 0.001). First treatment type also changed: surgery was the first line option up until the last decade in which medical treatment was preferred (p < 0.001). Radiotherapy was barely used as first treatment. Treatment combinations changed over time (p < 0.001). The most common treatment combination (surgery plus medical therapy), was received by 24.4, 16.4, 25.3 and 56.5 % of patients over decades. Medical treatment alone was performed in 7.3, 6, 7.2 and 14.7 % over decades. Type of medical treatment also changed, SRLs becoming the first medical treatment modality in the last decades, whereas dopamine agonist use declined (p < 0.001). Surgical cure rates improved over decades (21, 21, 36 and 38 %, p = 0.002) and were not influenced by SRL pre-surgical use. Acromegaly treatment has changed in Spain in the last four decades. Surgery has been the main treatment option for decades; however, medical therapy has replaced surgery as first line in the last decade and radiotherapy rates have clearly declined. SRLs are the most used medical treatment.

Assessment of real-world usage of lanreotide AUTOGEL 120 in Polish acromegalic patients - results from the prospective 12-month phase of Lanro-Study

Aim of the study

To assess resource utilization and costs of treatment with lanreotide AUTOGEL 120 mg (ATG120) administered as part of routine acromegaly care in Poland.

Material and methods

A multicentre, non-interventional, observational study on resource utilization in Polish acromegalic patients treated with ATG120 at 4 weeks or extended (> 4 weeks) dosing interval. The study recruited adult acromegalic patients treated medically for ≥ 1 year including at least 3 injections of ATG120. Data on dosing interval, aspects of administration, and resource utilization were collected prospectively during 12 months. Costs were calculated in PLN from the public health-care payer perspective for the year 2013.

Results

139 patients were included in the analysis. Changes in dosing regimen were reported in 14 (9.4%) patients. Combined treatment was used in 11 (8%) patients. Seventy patients (50%) received ATG120 at an extended dosing interval; the mean number of days between injections was 35.56 (SD 8.4). ATG120 was predominantly administered in an out-patient setting (77%), by health-care professionals (94%). Mean time needed for preparation and administration was 4.33 and 1.58 min, respectively, mean product wastage – 0.13 mg. Patients were predominantly treated in an out-patient setting with 7.06 physician visits/patient/year. The most common control examinations were magnetic resonance imaging of brain and brain stem (1.36/patient/year), ultrasound of the neck (1.35/patient/year), GH (1.69/patient/year), glycaemia (1.12/patient/year), IGF-1 (0.84/patient/year), pituitary-thyroid axis hormone levels assessment (TSH-0.58/patient/year, T4-0.78/patient/year). There were 0.43 hospitalizations/patient/year. For direct medical costs estimated at PLN 50 692/patient/year the main item was the costs of ATG120 (PLN 4103.87/patient/month; 97%). The mean medical cost, excluding pharmacotherapy, was PLN 1445/patient/year (out-patient care – 49%, hospitalization – 23%, diagnostics/laboratory tests – 28%).

Conclusions

These results represent the current use of ATG120 in the population of Polish acromegalic patients in a realistic clinical setting. Findings that 50% of patients could be treated with dose intervals of longer than 28 days support the potential of ATG120 to reduce the treatment burden.

Management options for persistent postoperative acromegaly

This article presents management options for the patient with acromegaly after noncurative surgery. The current evidence for repeat surgery, adjuvant medical therapy with somatostatin analogues, dopamine agonists, the growth hormone receptor antagonist pegvisomant, combination medical therapy, and radiotherapy in the context of persistent postoperative disease are summarized. The relative advantages and disadvantages of each of these treatment modalities are explored, and a general treatment algorithm that integrates these modalities is proposed.

Clinical experience with lanreotide for the treatment of acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare disease, characterized in adults by its distinctive appearance of facial dysmorphism and swollen fingers. It is caused by an overproduction of growth hormone (GH) in more than 99% of patients and in nearly all cases is due to a pituitary adenoma. If surgical resection of the adenoma is not effective, medical treatment is usually the next treatment option. The most commonly used medications are the somatostatin analogues octreotide and lanreotide. Lanreotide is a synthetic somatostatin analogue and is available as slow-release microparticle (every 7-14 days) and prolonged-release liquid (autogel, every 28-56 days) formulations. Lanreotide autogel is a supersaturated aqueous formulation for deep subcutaneous injection and is sold in a ready-to-use prefilled syringe. This ease of use allows self or partner administration at home. This article reviews the use of lanreotide in the treatment of acromegaly and its advantages and disadvantages compared with other somatostatin analogues.

Lanreotide depot deep subcutaneous injection: a new method of delivery and its associated benefits

Acromegaly is a rare disease characterized by excessive growth hormone secretion, usually from a pituitary tumor. Treatment options include surgery, medical therapy, and in some cases, radiation therapy. Current medical therapy consists of treatment with somatostatin analog medications or a growth hormone receptor antagonist. There are two somatostatin analogs currently in use, octreotide and lanreotide. Both are supplied in long-acting formulations and are of comparable biochemical efficacy. Lanreotide is supplied in a prefilled syringe and is injected into deep subcutaneous tissue. Studies have been conducted to assess the efficacy of self- or partner administration, and have demonstrated that injection of lanreotide can be accomplished reliably and safely outside a physician's office. For patients who have achieved biochemical control with lanreotide, the FDA has recently approved an extended dosing interval. Selected patients may be able to receive the medication less frequently with injections of 120 mg administered every 6 or 8 weeks. This review focuses on the use of lanreotide in the treatment of acromegaly, the safety and efficacy of the drug, and the benefits afforded to patients because of unique aspects of the delivery of lanreotide.

Acromegaly: a review of current medical therapy and new drugs on the horizon

Acromegaly is a disease that results from a growth hormone (GH)–secreting pituitary tumor. Clinically, the disease is characterized by excessive skeletal growth, soft tissue enlargement with disfigurement, and increased risk of cardiovascular death. The goals of treatment are the removal or reduction of the tumor mass via surgery and normalization of GH secretion. Another treatment goal is the preservation of normal pituitary function if possible. Transsphenoidal surgery by an experienced neurosurgeon is usually the first line of therapy, especially for small tumors. Surgeon expertise is crucial for outcome, with dedicated pituitary surgeons having better results. However, overall cure rates remain low because patients with these tumors usually present at an incurable stage. Therefore, medical therapy to control excess GH secretion plays a significant role in a large proportion of patients with acromegaly who are not cured by surgery or other forms of therapy, such as radiotherapy, and/or are awaiting the effects of radiotherapy. If surgery is not curative, lifelong monitoring and the control of excess GH is usually necessary by a care team experienced in handling this chronic disease. In the past decade major progress has occurred in the development of highly specific and selective pharmacological agents that have greatly facilitated more aggressive management of active acromegaly. Treatment approach should be individualized and take into consideration a patient's tumor size and location, symptoms, comorbid conditions, and preferences. Because a surgical cure can be difficult to achieve, all patients, even those with what seems to be a clinically and biochemically inactive disease, should undergo long-term biochemical testing and pituitary MR imaging.

The endocrine tumor summit 2008: appraising therapeutic approaches for acromegaly and carcinoid syndrome

The Endocrine Tumor Summit convened in December 2008 to address 6 statements prepared by panel members that reflect important questions in the treatment of acromegaly and carcinoid syndrome. Data pertinent to each of the statements were identified through review of pertinent literature by one of the 9-member panel, enabling a critical evaluation of the statements and the evidence supporting or refuting them. Three statements addressed the validity of serum growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations as indicators or predictors of disease in acromegaly. Statements regarding the effects of preoperative somatostatin analog use on pituitary surgical outcomes, their effects on hormone and symptom control in carcinoid syndrome, and the efficacy of extended dosing intervals were reviewed. Panel opinions, based on the level of available scientific evidence, were polled. Finally, their views were compared with those of surveyed community-based endocrinologists and neurosurgeons.

Medical therapy of acromegaly in Turkey

Acromegaly is associated with multiple co-morbidities and risk of premature mortality. Mortality rate of acromegalic patients is similar to that of the general population when normal GH levels are achieved. Surgery is the mainstay of acromegaly but when surgery fails to achieve disease control, or when surgery is impossible or contraindicated, patients are offered medical therapy and/or radiotherapy. Current medical therapy modalities were revised in this short review.

Management of acromegaly in Latin America: expert panel recommendations

Although there are international guidelines orienting physicians on how to manage patients with acromegaly, such guidelines should be adapted for use in distinct regions of the world. A panel of neuroendocrinologists convened in Mexico City in August of 2007 to discuss specific considerations in Latin America. Of major discussion was the laboratory evaluation of acromegaly, which requires the use of appropriate tests and the adoption of local institutional standards. As a general rule to ensure diagnosis, the patient's GH level during an oral glucose tolerance test and IGF-1 level should be evaluated. Furthermore, to guide treatment decisions, both GH and IGF-1 assessments are required. The treatment of patients with acromegaly in Latin America is influenced by local issues of cost, availability and expertise of pituitary neurosurgeons, which should dictate therapeutic choices. Such treatment has undergone profound changes because of the introduction of effective medical interventions that may be used after surgical debulking or as first-line medical therapy in selected cases. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of therapy for small pituitary adenomas (microadenomas), potentially resectable macroadenomas and invasive adenomas causing visual defects. Radiotherapy may be indicated in selected cases when no disease control is achieved despite optimal surgical debulking and medical therapy, when there is no access to somatostatin analogues, or when local issues of cost preclude other therapies. Since not all the diagnostic tools and treatment options are available in all Latin American countries, physicians need to adapt their clinical management decisions to the available local resources and therapeutic options.

Rapid and sustained reduction of serum growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 in patients with acromegaly receiving lanreotide Autogel therapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study with a 52 week open extension

The study was designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of the 28-day prolonged-release Autogel formulation of the somatostatin analogue lanreotide (Lan-Autogel) in unselected patients with acromegaly. The study comprised four phases: washout; a double-blind comparison with placebo, at a single randomized dose (60, 90 or 120 mg) of Lan-Autogel; a single-blind, fixed-dose phase for four injections (placebo group was re-allocated to active treatment); and eight injections with doses tailored according to biochemical response. Serum samples were assessed for growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels, at weeks 4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 32 and 52. 108 patients were enrolled and 99 completed 52 weeks' treatment. Four weeks after the first injection, serum GH levels decreased by >50% from baseline in 63% of patients receiving Lan-Autogel compared with 0% receiving placebo (P < 0.001). After four injections, 72% of patients had a >50% reduction in GH levels; 49% patients achieved GH levels < or = 2.5 ng/ml; 54% had normalized IGF-1; and 38% achieved the combined criterion of GH level < or = 2.5 ng/ml and normalized IGF-1. The corresponding proportions by week 52 were 82, 54, 59 and 43%, respectively. In patients not requiring dose escalation to 120 mg, 85% achieved biochemical control (combined criterion). Treatment was well tolerated by all patients. In conclusion, Lan-Autogel was effective in controlling GH and IGF-1 hypersecretion in patients with acromegaly and showed a rapid onset of action.

Effects of lanreotide SR and Autogel on tumor mass in patients with acromegaly: a systematic review

Long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSA) are widely used for the treatment of acromegaly achieving biochemical control of the disease in 50-75% of the patients. One of the goals of the treatment of acromegaly is the control of tumor growth, especially in patients in whom SSAs are used as first-line therapy. Over the recent years, there has been growing evidence that SSAs are able to induce tumor shrinkage in patients with acromegaly. However, most of the data are from patients under treatment with octreotide, either subcutaneously or intramuscularly with long-acting formulation, whereas the data on lanreotide SR or Autogel are very few. Indeed, octreotide and lanreotide, i.e. the two commercially available SSAs, show slight differences in pharmacokinetics and patterns of receptor affinities with potentially different therapeutic effects. We aimed to perform a systematic review of literature data concerning the shrinkage effects of long-acting lanreotide in patients with acromegaly. The analysis was focused on the following issues: differences in shrinkage effects between primary and secondary medical treatment, predictive value of baseline tumor volume and correlation between biochemical control and shrinkage effects. The peer-reviewed medical literature was searched to identify clinical trials studying the effects of lanreotide SR or Autogel on adenoma size in acromegaly. To be included in this analysis, studies had one of the following designs: randomized controlled trial; prospective, nonrandomized trial; retrospective study. Twenty-two studies were found to be eligible for the final analysis, in which tumor size was measured as an end-point for lanreotide treatment. Overall a total of 32.8% of patients experienced a variable degree (from 10 to 77%) of tumor shrinkage during lanreotide SR or Autogel treatment. The analysis showed that tumor shrinkage was more frequent in naïve patients as compared with those previously treated by radiotherapy, surgery or drugs other than lanreotide. The data on the correlation between tumor shrinkage and baseline tumor size were discordant, but when baseline tumor size was specified, more than 80% of patients undergoing shrinkage under lanreotide Autogel had macroadenomas. Finally, with lanreotide Autogel there was no evident correlation between biochemical response and tumor shrinkage. Our systematic review of the literature shows that lanreotide particularly when used as first-line therapy is able to quite frequently induce tumor shrinkage in patients with acromegaly. This finding suggests that this drug may have a role in the primary treatment of acromegaly.

Medical therapy of acromegaly: efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogues

Acromegaly is a chronic disease with signs and symptoms due to growth hormone (GH) excess. The most frequent cause of acromegaly is a GH-producing pituitary adenoma. Chronic GH excess is accompanied by long-term complications of the locomotor (arthrosis) and cardiovascular (atherosclerosis, cardiomyopathy) systems and is, when untreated, associated with an increased mortality. The aim of treatment of acromegaly is to improve symptoms, to achieve local tumour mass control, and to decrease morbidity and mortality. Treatment options include surgery, medical therapy and radiotherapy. Transsphenoidal surgery is the first choice of treatment when a definitive cure can be achieved, particularly in the case of microadenomas and when decompression of surrounding structures (optic chiasm, ophthalmic motor nerves) is indicated. Primary medical therapy has been increasingly applied in recent years, especially when a priori chances of surgical cure are low (because of adenoma size and localization) and in patients with advanced age and/or serious co-morbidity. In addition, preoperative primary medical therapy may result in tumour shrinkage, facilitating tumour resection, and may reduce perioperative complications due to GH excess. Within the spectrum of medical therapy, long-acting somatostatin analogues (somatostatins) are considered as first-line treatment. Treatment with somatostatin analogues results in GH control in approximately 60% of patients. In addition, somatostatin analogues induce tumour shrinkage in 30-50% of patients, particularly when applied as primary therapy. Prolonged treatment with somatostatin analogues appears to be safe and is usually well tolerated. The currently available somatostatin analogues, octreotide and lanreotide, seem to be equally effective; however, this should still be evaluated in prospective, randomized trials evaluating efficacy with respect to GH control and tumour shrinkage. In patients with an insufficient clinical and biochemical response to somatostatin analogues, combination therapy with dopamine receptor agonists or the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant usually leads to disease control. New developments in the medical therapy of acromegaly include the universal somatostatin receptor agonist pasireotide, which has a broader affinity for all somatostatin receptor (sst) subtypes compared with the currently available somatostatin analogues with preferential affinity for the sst2 receptor, and chimeric compounds that interact with both somatostatin and dopamine receptors with synergizing effects on GH secretion.

Cost-effectiveness of lanreotide Autogel in treatment algorithms of acromegaly

The introduction of effective pharmacological treatments has changed the management of acromegaly. However, chronic, life-long treatment with somatostatin analogues and/or growth hormone receptor antagonists is very expensive. We estimated the costs of treatment algorithms to control acromegaly from a Dutch perspective. We used the following assumptions: after the diagnosis of acromegaly there is a mean remaining lifespan of approximately 33 years; the success rates of surgery and somatostatin analogues in controlling the disease are approximately 60%; and the lifelong costs of different algorithms to control acromegaly in 100 patients ranged from 43 million euros (primary surgery and secondary somatostatin analogues) to 57 million euros (primary somatostatin analogues and secondary surgery) and even reached 95 million euros (medical treatment only). In algorithms that include trans-sphenoidal surgery, the lifetime treatment costs are almost 46-59% cheaper per 100 patients than in algorithms with medical treatment but without trans-sphenoidal surgery. Algorithms with primary surgery and secondary somatostatin analogs are 30% cheaper per 100 patients than algorithms with primary somatostatin analogues and secondary surgery. Per 100 patients, algorithms including lanreotide Autogel are 14-34% more expensive than algorithms including octreotide long-acting release. These life-long costs should be taken into consideration when making choices between treatment algorithms.

Significant tumour shrinkage after 12 months of lanreotide Autogel-120 mg treatment given first-line in acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate GH and IGF-I control and tumour shrinkage in newly diagnosed patients with acromegaly treated first-line with lanreotide-Autogel (ATG) 120 mg. Design Open, prospective.

PATIENTS

Twenty-six patients (17 women, aged 31-70 years): eight enclosed and 12 extrasellar (eight invasive) macroadenomas and six microadenomas (one invasive). ATG 120 mg initially given every 4 weeks for 12 weeks; then intervals between injections increased to every 6 or 8 weeks if GH levels were <or= 2.5 or < 1 microg/l (equal to 6.5 and 2.6 mU/l), respectively.

RESULTS

Final dosage was ATG 120 mg every 4 weeks in nine patients (34.6%), every 6 weeks in eight patients (30.8%) and every 8 weeks in the remaining nine patients (34.6%). After 12 months, both GH and IGF-I were controlled in 14 patients (53.8%). The mean tumour volume decreased from 1405 +/- 1827 mm(3) at study entry to 960 +/- 1381 mm(3) after 6 months, and 799 +/- 1161 mm(3) after 12 months (P < 0.0001). Overall tumour shrinkage was 35.8 +/- 28.1% after 6 months and 48.4 +/- 27.6% after 12 months. After 12 months, 20 patients (76.9%) achieved > 25% tumour shrinkage: 12 of 14 with controlled disease (85.7%) and 8 of 12 with noncontrolled disease (66.7%; P = 0.49). Hyperhydrosis, paresthesiae and arthralgias significantly reduced after treatment. No patient withdrew from the study because of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

ATG 120 mg in newly diagnosed patients with acromegaly controls GH and IGF-I secretion in 53.8% and induces >or= 25% tumour shrinkage in 76.9% during a 12-month period. The treatment was associated with improvement of clinical symptoms and with a good safety profile.

Lanreotide for the treatment of acromegaly

Lanreotide is an eight-amino acid peptide, which is an analog of the native somatostatin peptide, physiological inhibitor of growth hormone (GH). The drug shows high binding affinity for somatostatin receptors, SSTR2 and SSTR5, which is the primary mechanism considered to be responsible for decreasing GH secretion and GH cell proliferation in acromegaly. Two different formulations of lanreotide are currently available: lanreotide slow release, which requires intramuscular injection every 7-14 days, and lanreotide autogel, which requires deep subcutaneous injection every 4-8 weeks. Several studies have been published to date on the use of lanreotide in acromegaly. Antisecretory efficacy has been reported in 35%-70% of cases; this huge variability is probably explained by different indications (eg, primary or adjunctive postsurgical treatment), or the fact that some studies were based on patients known to be responders to somatostatin analogs. As a primary treatment, antisecretory efficacy was very similar, confirming the possibility of lanreotide as an option in cases of unsuccessful surgery, contraindication, or surgery refusal. Lanreotide also has antitumoral effects as it induces a decrease in tumor volume of [Symbol: see text]25% in 30%-70% of patients. This could be beneficial before transsphenoidal surgery, as a pretreatment, to decrease tumor volume and ease surgery; however, to date, advantages in terms of final remission or uncured status remain a matter of debate. Side effects are rare; the most frequent being gastrointestinal discomfort and increased risk of gallstone formation, and glucose metabolism modifications. Comparison with the other somatostatin analog, octreotide, tends to show identical levels of efficacy between both drugs. Lanreotide thus seems to be an effective treatment in acromegaly. To date, however, lanreotide is still considered as only suspending GH secretion, thus requiring prolonged and costly treatment.

Effects of lanreotide Autogel on growth hormone, insulinlike growth factor 1, and tumor size in acromegaly: a 1-year prospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of lanreotide Autogel on growth hormone and insulinlike growth factor 1 (IGF-1) concentrations and tumor size in patients with acromegaly.

METHODS

Between September 2004 and March 2006, patients with active acromegaly who had not previously been treated with somatostatin analogues or received irradiation were enrolled in a 1-year, prospective, open, multicenter study. Lanreotide Autogel was injected subcutaneously starting with 90 mg every 4 weeks for 2 cycles and then individually titrated, aiming for safe growth hormone concentrations (<2.5 ng/mL) and normal age-matched IGF-1 concentrations. Tumor shrinkage, clinical score, pituitary function, and safety parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (15 women, 12 men) were enrolled. One patient withdrew because of treatment intolerance, and 5 proceeded to neurosurgery 6 months into the study. Lanreotide Autogel was the primary treatment in 19 patients (4 with microadenoma, 15 with macroadenoma) and the adjuvant treatment in 8 patients in whom it followed a previous unsuccessful neurosurgery. In the 26 patients, safe growth hormone values were achieved in 11 (42%), normal IGF-1 values in 14 (54%), and both targets were achieved in 10 (38%). Tumors shrank in 16 of the 22 patients (73%) in whom tumor shrinkage could be evaluated. The maximal vertical diameter of the tumor decreased by a mean of 24% (range, 0% to 50%), from 14.4 +/- 8.4 mm to 10.4 +/- 7 mm, and tumor volume decreased by a mean of 44% (range, 0% to 76%), from 2536 mm3 (range, 115-7737 mm(3)) to 1461 mm(3) (range, 63-6217 mm(3)) (both P<.015). Symptom scores and lipid levels significantly improved. In the 26 patients, glucose metabolism deteriorated in 3 (12%) and improved in 4 (15%). New biliary alterations appeared in 26%. Pituitary function and safety parameters did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

Lanreotide Autogel treatment, titrated for optimal hormonal control, effectively controls IGF-1 and growth hormone levels, shrinks tumors, reduces acromegalic symptoms, and is well tolerated.

Efficacy of the new long-acting formulation of lanreotide (lanreotide Autogel) in somatostatin analogue-naive patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate efficacy and safety of lanreotide autogel (ATG) 120 mg injections every 4-8 weeks in somatostatin analogue-naïve patients with acromegaly.

DESIGN

Open, non-comparative, phase III, multicenter clinical study.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients (28 women, aged 19-78 yr): 39 newly diagnosed (de novo) and 12 who had previously undergone unsuccessful surgery (post-op, 11 macro and 1 micro) were studied. ATG 120 mg was initially given every 8 weeks for 24 weeks and subsequently changed according to GH levels: if <or=2.5 microg/l every 8 weeks (group A, 17 patients); if 2.5-5 microg/l every 6 weeks (group B, 15 patients); and if >5 microg/l every 4 weeks (group C, 19 patients). Treatment duration was 48-52 weeks. The primary objective was to control GH and IGF-I levels (GH<or=2.5 microg/l and IGF-I normalized for age/gender). Secondary objectives were to assess GH, IGF-I, and acid-labile subunit (ALS) decrease, improvement of clinical symptoms and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

GH levels normalized in 32 patients (63%), similarly in de novo and post-op patients (72% vs 50%, p=0.48); in 100% of group A, in 73% of group B and in 21% of group C (p<0.0001). IGF-I levels normalized in 19 patients (37%), similarly in the de novo and post-op patients (33% vs 50%, p=0.48): in 65% of group A, 33% of group B, and in 16% of group C. Circulating GH levels decreased by 80+/-17%, IGF-I levels by 44+/-27%, and ALS by 30+/-17%. Symptoms (hyperhidrosis (68.6%), swelling (68.6%), asthenia (58.8%), spine arthralgia (54.9%), and paresthesias (52.9%) and QoL (from 9.1+/-7.9 to 6.1+/-6.6) significantly improved (p<0.001). No patient withdrew from the study because of adverse events (AE). The most frequent AE was diarrhea (76.2% of patients): at study end 16 mild and 1 moderate diarrhea were recorded. Gallstones developed in 12% of patients.

CONCLUSION

ATG 120 mg in somatostatin-naïve patients with acromegaly controls GH secretion in 63% and IGF-I secretion in 37% during a 48-52 week period without any difference between de novo and post-op patients. The treatment was associated with improvement in clinical symptoms and QoL and with a good, safe profile.

Therapeutic options in the management of acromegaly: focus on lanreotide Autogel

BACKGROUND

In acromegaly, expert surgery is curative in only about 60% of patients. Postoperative radiation therapy is associated with a high incidence of hypopituitarism and its effect on growth hormone (GH) production is slow, so that adjuvant medical treatment becomes of importance in the management of many patients.

OBJECTIVE

To delineate the role of lanreotide in the treatment of acromegaly.

METHODS

Search of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases for clinical studies of lanreotide in acromegaly.

RESULTS

Treatment with lanreotide slow release and lanreotide Autogel((R)) normalized GH and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations in about 50% of patients. The efficacy of 120 mg lanreotide Autogel((R)) on GH and IGF-I levels was comparable with that of 20 mg octreotide LAR. There were no differences in improvement of cardiac function, decrease in pancreatic beta-cell function, or occurrence of side effects, including cholelithiasis, between octreotide LAR and lanreotide Autogel(R). When postoperative treatment with somatostatin analogs does not result in normalization of serum IGF-I and GH levels after noncurative surgery, pegvisomant alone or in combination with somatostatin analogs can control these levels in a substantial number of patients.

A critical analysis of clinically available somatostatin analog formulations for therapy of acromegaly

CONTEXT

Short and long-acting somatostatin (SRIF) analogs are approved for clinical use in acromegaly. Recent analysis of the relative efficacy of octreotide LAR and lanreotide SR on the GH-IGF-I axis in acromegaly favored octreotide LAR in the secondary treatment of patients not preselected by SRIF responsiveness. A novel aqueous formulation of lanreotide, lanreotide Autogel (ATG), has recently been approved and is the predominant (and only in the United States) formulation of lanreotide used clinically.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a critical review of SRIF analog treatment to establish the relative efficacy of three clinically available SRIF analog preparations, octreotide LAR, lanreotide SR, and lanreotide ATG (Somatuline depot in the United States) in control of the GH-IGF-I axis in acromegaly.

DATA SOURCES

Data were drawn from MEDLINE and the bibliography of analyses of long-acting SRIF analogs.

DATA COLLECTION

We reviewed the largest studies of sc octreotide, octreotide LAR, and lanreotide SR, all that included biochemical end-point data for lanreotide ATG, and studies that directly compared the efficacy of octreotide LAR and lanreotide SR.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Caveats considered included differences in baseline GH and IGF-I values, patient selection, and interassay and intraassay variability, confounding the analysis. Studies comparing patients treated contiguously with lanreotide SR and octreotide LAR are fraught with methodological problems, however, are suggestive of marginally greater efficacy in control of the GH-IGF-I axis for octreotide LAR. Lanreotide ATG shows noninferiority to lanreotide SR. Five small studies directly comparing octreotide LAR and lanreotide ATG suggest no significant differences between these preparations in control of biochemical end-points.

CONCLUSION

Lanreotide ATG and octreotide LAR are equivalent in the control of symptoms and biochemical markers in patients with acromegaly.

Control of IGF-I levels with titrated dosing of lanreotide Autogel over 48 weeks in patients with acromegaly

BACKGROUND

An essential criterion for control of acromegaly is normalization of IGF-I levels. Somatostatin analogues act to suppress IGF-I and GH levels.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of 48 weeks titrated dosing of lanreotide Autogel.

DESIGN

Open-label, multicentre, phase III, 48-week trial.

METHODS

Patients with active acromegaly (IGF-I levels > 1.3 times upper limit of age-adjusted normal range) were recruited. Twelve injections of lanreotide Autogel were given at 28-day intervals: during the 16-week fixed-dose phase, patients received 90 mg; in the 32-week dose-titration phase, patients received 60, 90 or 120 mg according to GH and IGF-I levels. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed to determine the proportion of patients with normalized age-adjusted IGF-I levels at study end. Secondary evaluations included GH levels, clinical acromegaly signs and safety.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven of 63 patients completed the study. Lanreotide Autogel resulted in normalized age-adjusted IGF-I levels in 27 patients (43%, 95% CI 31-55). Mean GH levels decreased from 6.2 to 1.5 microg/l at study end, with 53 of 62 patients (85%) having GH levels < or = 2.5 microg/l (95% CI 76.7-94.3) and 28 of 62 patients (45%) with levels < 1 microg/l (95% CI 32.8-57.6). Twenty-four (38%) had both normal IGF-I levels and GH levels < or = 2.5 microg/l. Acromegaly symptoms reduced significantly in most patients throughout the study. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal, as expected for somatostatin analogues.

CONCLUSIONS

Using IGF-I as primary end-point, 48 weeks lanreotide Autogel treatment, titrated for optimal hormonal control, controlled IGF-I and GH levels effectively, reduced acromegaly symptoms and was well tolerated.

Somatostatin agonists for treatment of acromegaly

The discovery of somatotropin-release inhibitory factor (SRIF) in hypothalamic extract in 1970 led to the synthesis of the first somatostatin analog octreotide, discovery of five somatostatin receptor subtypes, and development of additional somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL) as pharmacotherapy for acromegaly and other neuroendocrine tumors. Long-acting formulations of SRL (octreotide LAR Depot, lanreotide SR and lanreotide autogel) assure improved patient compliance with weekly up to monthly injections, and are commonly used as primary or adjuvant treatment of acromegaly. We review SRL currently available, emphasizing long-acting compounds and their efficacy in controlling acromegaly. Disease control is evaluated by biochemical markers, tumor shrinkage, and disease-symptom improvement balanced against drug-related side effects.

Acromegaly

Acromegaly is caused by growth hormone hypersecretion, mostly from a pituitary adenoma, driving insulin-like growth factor 1 overproduction. Manifestations include skeletal and soft tissue growth and deformities; and cardiac, respiratory, neuromuscular, endocrine, and metabolic complications. Increased morbidity and mortality require early and tight disease control. Surgery is the treatment of choice for microadenomas and well-defined intrasellar macroadenomas. Complete resection of large and invasive macroadenomas rarely is achieved; hence, their low rate of disease remission. Pharmacologic treatments, including long-acting somatostatin analogs, dopamine agonists, and growth hormone receptor antagonists, have assumed more importance in achieving biochemical and symptomatic disease control.

Optimalization and cost management of lanreotide-Autogel therapy in acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Lanreotide-Autogel is a depot formulation of the somatostatin analog lanreotide used in the treatment of acromegaly. We investigated whether prolonging or shortening the interval between injections would offer any benefit.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The interval was prolonged from once every 4 weeks to once every 6 weeks when patients (n=9) had normal IGF-I and GH concentrations. When patients (n=12) had still elevated IGF-I or GH on the maximal dose of 120 mg every 4 weeks, the interval was shortened to once every 3 weeks. Serum IGF-I and GH were measured after 12 and 24 weeks to allow for dose adaptation. Symptoms and tumor volume were evaluated at baseline and after 36 weeks.

RESULTS

In seven of the nine subjects with normal IGF-I and GH, the interval could be extended to 6 weeks without loosing efficacy on IGF-I (195 vs 213 microg/l; not significant, NS) and GH concentrations (1.4 vs 1.3 microg/l; NS). The weekly dose could significantly be reduced (from 23.3 to 17.8 mg; P=0.002). In only 1 of the 12 not-controlled patients, reducing the interval to once every 3 weeks induced normalization of IGF-I and GH.

CONCLUSION

In subjects whose acromegaly is well controlled using lanreotide-Autogel, prolonging the time interval between injections can often be increased 4 to 6 weeks without loss of efficacy, thereby improving the subject's comfort and reducing the cost of treatment. On the other hand, in subjects whose acromegaly is not controlled on a dose of 120 mg every 4 weeks, reducing the interval to every 3 weeks is rarely beneficial.

The role of lanreotide Autogel® in the treatment of acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare disease, but all clinicians have to be aware of the diagnosis in order to minimize the negative consequences of increased levels of growth hormone and IGF-I, and the possible impact of a pituitary macroadenoma. Surgery remains the first-line therapy and may alleviate both hormonal excess and symptoms due to tumor mass effects. Postoperatively, however, many patients may need adjunctive therapy. Somatostatin analogs were marketed for clinical use in the 1980s. The depot formulations of the synthetic somatostatin analogs octreotide and lanreotide, octreotide acetate long-acting repeatable and lanreotide sustained release, were developed by incorporating the analogs into microspheres. The advantage of the new formulation of lanreotide, lanreotide Autogel^®, is the prefilled syringe of lanreotide and water. The choice of analog should be individualized for each patient based on level of efficacy, adverse event profile and preferred mode of administration. Approximately a third of acromegalic patients are resistant to the currently available somatostatin analogs. Monotherapy using cabergoline or pegvisomant is clinically available. Adding cabergoline to a somatostatin analog may be advantageous in selected patients and promising data exist regarding combination therapy with pegvisomant. Radiotherapy is still an option; however, although treating comorbidities and avoiding hypopituitarism is very important, radiotherapy should only be used for selected patients where treatment targets cannot be achieved by using the other therapies.

Lanreotide autogel every 6 weeks compared with Lanreotide microparticles every 3 weeks in patients with well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors: a Phase III Study

BACKGROUND

The noninferiority of a 6-week dosing schedule of lanreotide Autogel (Lan ATG) at a dose of 120 mg compared with a 3-week dosing schedule of lanreotide microparticles (Lan MP) at a dose of 60 mg was investigated in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET).

METHODS

Patients who had sporadic, well differentiated NET with a low grade of malignancy were recruited for this open-label, Phase III, multicenter trial. Patients were randomized to receive either 3 deep subcutaneous injections of Lan ATG (120 mg, every 6 weeks) or 6 intramuscular injections of Lan MP (60 mg, every 3 weeks). Tumor markers, tumor size, and symptoms were assessed between baseline and Week 18. Success was classified as a response that ranged from disappearance to an increase <25% in tumor marker, tumor size, or symptom frequency.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were randomized, and 46 patients completed the study. Both for tumor markers and for tumor size, Lan ATG was not inferior to Lan MP (55% and 59% of patients responded on tumor markers, respectively; 68% and 66% of patients responded on tumor size, respectively). There were too few symptomatic patients to compare carcinoid symptoms. Both treatments were tolerated well, and no safety concerns were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Lan ATG at a dose of 120 mg every 6 weeks was as effective for controlling NET as Lan MP at a dose of 60 mg every 3 weeks.